Christendom sends its missionaries
to Heathendom at an expense of millions drained from the pockets of would-be
pious folks, who court respectability. Thousands of homeless and penniless
old men, women and children are allowed to starve for lack of funds, for
the sake, perhaps, of one converted "heathen." All the spare money
of the charitable is absorbed by these dead-head travelling agents of the
Christian Church. What is the result? Visit the prison cells of so-called
Christian lands, crammed with delinquents who have been led on to felony
by the weary path of starvation, and you will have the answer.
Read in the daily papers the numerous accounts of executions, and you
will find that modern Christianity offers, perhaps unintentionally but none
the less surely, a premium for murder and other heinous crimes. Is anyone
prepared to deny the assertion? Remember that, while many a respectable
unbeliever dies in his bed with the comfortable assurance from his next
of kin, and good friends in general, that he is going to hell, the red-handed
criminal has but to believe at his eleventh hour that the blood of the Saviour
can and will save him, to receive the guarantee of his spiritual adviser
that he will find himself when launched into eternity in the bosom of Christ,
in heaven, and playing upon the traditional harp. Why, then, should any
Christian deny himself the pleasure and profit of robbing, or even murdering,
his richer neighbour? And such a doctrine is being promulgated among the
heathen at the cost of an annual expenditure of millions.
But, in her eternal wisdom, Nature provides antidotes against moral as
well as against mineral and vegetable poisons. There are people who do not
content themselves with preaching grandiloquent discourses; they act. If
such books as Higgins Anacalypsis, and that extraordinary work
of an anonymous English author a bishop, it is whispered entitled
Supernatural Religion, cannot awaken responsive echoes among the
ignorant masses, other means can be, and are resorted to means more
effectual and which will bring fruit in the future, if hitherto prevented
by the crushing hand of ecclesiastical and monarchical despotism. Those
whom the written proofs of the fictitious character of biblical authority
cannot reach, may be saved by the spoken word. And this work of disseminating
the truth among the more ignorant classes is being ardently prosecuted by
an army of devoted scholars and teachers, simultaneously in India and America.
The Theosophical Society has been of late so much spoken about; such
idle tales have been circulated about it its members being sworn to
secrecy and hitherto unable, even if willing, to proclaim the truth about
it that the public may be gratified to know, at least, about one portion
of its work. It is now in organized affiliation with the Ârya Samâj
of India, its Western representative, and, so to say, under the order of
its chiefs. A younger Society than the Brâhmo Samâj, it was
instituted to save the Hindûs from exoteric idolatries, Brâhmanism
and Christian missionaries.
The purely Theistic movement connected with the Brâhmo Samâj
had its origin in the same idea. It began early in the present century,
but spasmodically and with interruption, and only took concrete shape under
the leadership of Baboo Keshub Chunder Sen in 1858. Rammohun Roy, who may
be termed the combined Fénélon and Thomas Paine of Hindûstan,
was its parent, his first church having been organized shortly before his
death in 1833. One of the greatest and most acute of controversial writers
that our century has produced, his works ought to be translated and circulated
in every civilized land. At his death, the work of the Brâhmo Samâj
was interrupted. As Miss Collett says, in her Brahmo Year Book for
1878, it was only in October, 1839, that Debendra Nath Tagore founded the
Tattvabodhini Sabhâ (or Society for the Knowledge of Truth), which
lasted for twenty years, and did much to arouse the energies and form the
principles of the young church of the Brâhmo Samâj. But exoteric
or open religion as it is now, it must have been conducted at first much
on the principles of the secret societies, as we are informed that Keshub
Chunder Sen, a resident of Calcutta and a pupil of the Presidency College,
who had long before quitted the orthodox Brâhmanical Church and was
searching for a purely Theistic religion, " had never heard of the
Brâhmo Samâj before 1858" (see The Theistic Annual,
1878, p. 45).
Since then the Brâhmo Samâj, which he then joined, has flourished
and become more popular every day. We now find it with Samâjes established
in many provinces and cities. At least, we learn that in May, 1877, fifty
Samâjes have notified their adhesion to the Society and eight of them
have appointed their representatives. Native missionaries of the Theistic
religion oppose the Christian missionaries and the orthodox Brâhmans,
and the work is going on lively. So much for the Brâhmo movement.
And now, with regard to the Ârya Samâj, The Indian Tribune
uses the following language in speaking of its founder:
The first quarter of the sixteenth century was no more an age of reformation
in Europe than the one we now live in is, at this moment, in India. From
amongst its own "Benedictines," Swamî Dyanand Saraswati
has arisen, who, unlike other reformers, does not wish to set up a new
religion of his own, but asks his countrymen to go back to the pristine
purity and Theism of their Vedic religion. After preaching his views in
Bombay, Poona, Calcutta, and the N.-W. Provinces, he came to the Punjab
last year, and here it is that he found the most congenial soil.
It was in the land of the five rivers, on the banks of the Indus, that
the Vedas were first compiled. It was the Punjab that gave birth to a Nanak.
And it is the Punjab that is making such efforts for a revival of Vedic
learning and its doctrines, And wherever Swamî Dyanand goes, his splendid
physique, his manly bearing, eloquence and his incisive logic bear down
all opposition. People rise up and say: We shall remain no longer in this
state for ourselves, we have had enough of a crafty priesthood and a demoralizing
idolatry, and we shall tolerate them no longer. we shall wipe off the ugliness
of ages, and try to shine forth in the original radiance and effulgence
of our Âryan ancestors.
The Svamî is a most highly honoured Fellow of the Theosophical
Society, takes a deep interest in its proceedings, and The Indian Spectator
of Bombay, April 14th, 1878, spoke by the book when it said that the
work of Pundit Dyanand "bears intimate relation to the work of the
Theosophical Society."
While the members of the Brâhmo Samâj may be designated as
the Lutheran Protestants of orthodox Brâhmanism, the disciples of
the Svamî Dyanand should be compared to those learned mystics, the
Gnostics, who had the key to those earlier writings which, later, were worked
over into the Christian gospels and various patristic literature. As the
above-named pre-Christian sects understood the true esoteric meaning of
the Chrestos allegory, which is now materialized into the Jesus of flesh,
so the disciples of the learned and holy Svamî are taught to discriminate
between the written form and the spirit of the word preached in the Vedas.
And this is the principal point of difference between the Ârya
Samâj and the Brâhmos who, as it would seem, believe in a personal
God and repudiate the Vedas, while the Âryas see an everlasting
Principle, an impersonal Cause in the great "Soul of the universe"
rather than a personal being, and accept the Vedas as supreme authority,
though not of divine origin. But we may better quote in elucidation of the
subject what the President of the Bombay Ârya Samâj, also a
Fellow of the Theosophical Society, Mr. Hurrychund Chintamon, says in a
recent letter to our Society:
Pundit Dyanand maintains that as it is now universally acknowledged
that the Vedas are the oldest books of antiquity, if they contain
the truth and nothing but the truth in an unmutilated state, and nothing
new can be found in other works of later date, why should we not accept
the Vedas as a guide for Humanity? . . . A revealed book or revelation
is understood to mean one of two things, viz. (1) a book already written
by some invisible hand and thrown into the world; or (2) a work written
by one or more men while they were in their highest state of mental lucidity,
acquired by profound meditation upon the problems of who man is, whence
he came, whither he must go, and by what means he may emancipate himself
from worldly delusions and sufferings. The latter hypothesis may be regarded
as the more rational and correct.
Our Brother Hurrychund here describes those superior men whom we know
as Adepts. He adds:
The ancient inhabitants of a place near Thibet, and adjoining a lake
called Mansovara, were first called Deveneggury (Devanâgarî)
or godlike people. Their written characters were also called Deveneggury
or Balbadha letters. A portion of them migrated to the North and settled
there, and afterwards spread towards the South, while others went to the
West. All these emigrants styled themselves Âryans, or noble, pure,
and good men, as they considered that a pure gift had been made to humanity
from the "Pure Alone." These lofty souls were the authors of
the Vedas.
What more reasonable than the claim that such Scriptures, emanating from
such authors, should contain, for those who are able to penetrate the meaning
that lies half concealed under the dead letter, all the wisdom which it
is allowed to men to acquire on earth? The Chiefs of the Ârya Samâj
discredit "miracles," discountenance superstition and all violation
of natural law, and teach the purest form of Vaidic Philosophy. Such are
the allies of the Theosophical Society. They have said to us: "Let
us work together for the good of mankind," and we will.
H. P. Blavatsky
|