Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Different Era,
Same Tactics
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
The Rothschilds buried Russia with war
and debt and then cut off Russia's access to funds in the international money
markets, while plunging Russia into the Russo-Japanese War and then World War
I. The Rothschilds not only cut Russia off from the money markets, they
covertly funded the Japanese and Jewish "revolutionaries" to destroy
Russia. Racist Jews will tell you that these easily proven facts are an
"anti-Semitic canard". The Rothschilds bankrupted Egypt and then used
Egypt's plight as a manufactured opportunity to buy the Suez Canal. The
Rothschilds bankrupted the Turkish Empire in order to steal Palestine.
Today, Jews employ the same tactics.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is using the power of World
Jewry to bankrupt Iran. The Israelis stole the Palestinians' funds to drive
them into desperation and then fomented the Palestinian civil war. Not only was
this predictable behavior, I warned it would happen long ago.
How did I know? I knew because World
Jewry is simply acting today as it always has to destroy its neighbors through
economic means.
Netanyahu
departs for U.S. in bid to increase pressure on Iran
Takahashi Korekiyo, the Rothschilds and the Russo-Japanese War,
1904–1907
The Double
Standards of Zionist Neo-ConArtist Condoleezza Rice
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8585120847774215215
See also, and note the names
involved:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7917314315343162905
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Rabbinical Delight
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
First, have a look at this article:
Arab
media uses cartoons to blame Israel for Gaza infighting
Then listen to this:
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Enlarged Second Edition of "The Jewish Genocide of
Armenian Christians"
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
The enlarged second edition of my
book The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians is available for free
here:
Saturday, June 09, 2007
Television
Interview Covering "The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians"
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Rev. Bedros Hajian interviewed me on
his television program.
Audio
File of the Full Interview (6.5MB)
While the interview is in English,
the first minute is in Armenian. The discussion is about my book "The
Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians" and covers: the Turkish Empire,
Young Turks, Bolsheviks, the Doenmeh, Emmanuel Carasso, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk,
Shabbatai Zevi, Lev Bronstein a. k. a. "Leon Trotsky", Vladimir
Jaboinsky, Alexander Israel Lazarevich Helphand a. k. a. "Parvus",
Freemasons, Crypto-Jews, Zionism, World War I, Amalek, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran,
Syria, and more.
Thursday, June 07, 2007
Maddening Madness in
the Republican Presidential Debates: Zionists Are Conditioning Americans to
Accept and Expect a Nuclear World War III
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Several Zionist puppets are running
for President of the United States of America. In a Zionist puppet show, which
was moderated by the rabid Zionist Wolf Blitzer—former Washington correspondent
for the Jerusalem Post with purported ties to AIPAC, several of these
Zionist Presidential candidates iterated their psychotic delusion that the
United States has a right and a duty to aggressively wage nuclear war against
Iran if Iran fails to toe the Zionist line. These psychopathic lunatics, these
radical Zionists, presume to call the most vile of crimes against humanity,
aggressive nuclear war, an "option". Not merely do they falsely
presume that this planned criminal act is an "option", which it
certainly is not, they demand that the American People consider aggressive
nuclear war to be a reasonable approach to foreign policy, for, so they say,
only a fool would remove this "option" from the table, for, so they
say, only a fool would remove any "option" from the table.
What other "options" are
there? Are racist concentration camps "options" for Zionist
Americans, as they are for Israelis? Is staged genocide an "option"
for Zionist Americans, as it is for Israelis? Must racist mass murder, racist
extermination camps, racist torture chambers, racist rape centers, etc. be
"options" to these Zionists, which "options" must be
"left on the table"?
Before the Zionist media poisoned our
minds, we Americans did not consider crimes against humanity to be
"options", but Zionist Jews have so polluted our World with their
inhuman filth that Americans sit idly by sucking their thumbs while the
traitorous agents of Israel call us to nuclear arms against our fellow human
beings. We have entered an era of Judaization in which America is kicking down
civilians' doors in their own country and terrorizing and murdering defenseless
families in their own homes, just as the Israelis do to the Palestinians.
America is openly torturing prisoners in our custody, just as the Israelis do.
America is openly threatening aggressive nuclear war, just as the Israelis do.
America is openly committing all of these crimes against humanity at the behest
of the Israelis, who control our political elections through Jewish funding and
Jewish media domination.
Though these criminal Zionists
running for President should at the very least have been pilloried in the
international media and have been tarred and feathered by the American People
for proposing crimes against humanity exceeding the scale of Nazi atrocities,
the Jewish controlled media numbs the minds of the American public and
conditions them to accept and expect, as if inevitable, the descent of
humankind into the hell of aggressive nuclear war at the behest of the Israeli
puppet masters.
It is not just the genocide of the
Iranians these Zionist Jews seek. No, they plan to continue their Khazarian war
on the Russ and plan to drag the World into a nuclear attack on Russia. It is
not revenge enough on the Russians, that World Jewry mass murdered tens of
millions of the best of the Gentile Slavs, and enslaved the rest for the better
part of the Twentieth Century. These vampires will not quench their thirst
until the blood is gone.
For the sake of all that is wise,
just, loving, human and sane, consider the fact that on a Zionist dominated
program in which many grown men in positions of authority participated, Ron
Paul alone raised a voice of dissent against these warmongering crazies, and
the media gives their crimes against humanity, and all life, its Talmudic
approval through its silence. Each time these foul calls to nuclear war go
largely unchallenged, the American public grows numbed and dumbed. These
maniacs utter their Zionist cries for nuclear war, and the American public has
been so corrupted by the Judaists, that it passively waits for what it is told
is inevitable, the mushroom clouds sprouting from the dung of Zionist
controlled American traitors.
Americans are so stupid that they
fail to recognize that aggressive nuclear war is a crime against humanity, and
is not an "option". Americans are so insane that they fail to
see that launching aggressive nuclear war is an act of nuclear war, not the
prevention of nuclear war. Americans have been so blinded by Jewish hatred for
Islam, that they fail to recognize the illogic of using nuclear war as a means
to prevent nuclear war.
Doubt it not, that just as the laws
passed which preceded the Zionist traitor George W. Bush's illegal attack on
Iraq, enabled by a traitorous Zionist Congress, this maniacal and inhuman
rhetoric from Zionist Presidential candidates calling for nuclear war, and the
laws which have been passed to enable the President of the United States of
America to wage aggressive nuclear war, are the groundwork for such an attack
and it will come unless we act now to prevent it. Human life itself is at
stake, but these inhuman Zionists seem more concerned that fellow Zionist Libby
be pardoned for his crimes, than that the human race survive the Zionists' lust
for nuclear war.
These Zionist vampires are the
enemies of the human race. They have voiced their intentions. Hear them!
The Zionists begin talk of nuclear
war at about 19 minutes into the first segment, and Ron Paul alone speaks out
against them at about 4 minutes into the fourth segment:
Republican Presidential Debate Home Page at CNN.COM
After the Zionists have conditioned
Americans to accept and expect illegal aggressive nuclear war as if an
"option", they will next begin to condition Americans to demand
that America attack the World with nuclear weapons.
Saturday, June 02, 2007
Barack Obama: By
Definition an Israel-Firster
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Barack Obama has proven that he is a
Zionist puppet. Knowing what he must know, he insists upon misrepresenting the
obvious facts and scapegoating the Palestinians and Moslems for the fact that America
is a dishonest broker in the "peace process" and that Israel has
consistently and deliberately scuttled every attempt at peace.
Though Israel could live in peace
with its neighbors, Israelis prefer to perpetually war against their neighbors
and desire to steal ever more Arab land. Israel has again and again
aggressively and illegally attacked its Arab neighbors. The Israelis created
Hamas and Hezbullah and the Israelis and Americans have "strengthened
Iran", created "a chaotic Iraq", and brought about "the
resurgence of al Qaeda, the reinvigoration of Hamas and Hezbollah".
Israel is the enemy of the United
States, yet Obama bows down and licks their blood stained boots. Obama writes,
"For more than three decades, Israelis, Palestinians, Arab leaders, and the rest of the world have looked to America to lead the effort to build the road to a lasting peace. In recent years, they have all too often looked in vain. Our starting point must always be a clear and strong commitment to the security of Israel, our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy. That commitment is all the more important as we contend with growing threats in the region -- a strengthened Iran, a chaotic Iraq, the resurgence of al Qaeda, the reinvigoration of Hamas and Hezbollah. Now more than ever, we must strive to secure a lasting settlement of the conflict with two states living side by side in peace and security. To do so, we must help the Israelis identify and strengthen those partners who are truly committed to peace, while isolating those who seek conflict and instability. Sustained American leadership for peace and security will require patient effort and the personal commitment of the president of the United States. That is a commitment I will make. Throughout the Middle East, we must harness American power to reinvigorate American diplomacy. Tough-minded diplomacy, backed by the whole range of instruments of American power -- political, economic, and military -- could bring success even when dealing with long-standing adversaries such as Iran and Syria. Our policy of issuing threats and relying on intermediaries to curb Iran's nuclear program, sponsorship of terrorism, and regional aggression is failing. Although we must not rule out using military force, we should not hesitate to talk directly to Iran."—United States Senator and Presidential candidate Barack Obama, "Renewing American Leadership", Obama '08, www.barackobama.com, http://www.barackobama.com/2007/05/31/renewing_american_leadership.php, (31 May 2007).
A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for
the continued subversion of American interests for the benefit of racist,
warmongering Israelis, who refuse to live in peace, and who do everything they
can do to create instability and war. I recommend that people investigate the
tortuous path Barack Obama took to become a United States Senator and note the
attention that was lavished upon him by the Jewish controlled media as they
deliberately made him a star and overrated his rather mediocre mind. They are
now receiving the returns on their investment.
It will be interesting to see if the
media is using Obama and will sink his campaign at a strategic moment, as the Israelis
sink every vessel carrying the seeds of peace.
Friday, June 01, 2007
In Politics, Name
Recognition Is Darn Near Everything
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
The Presidential primaries have
turned into a cattle call of candidates. With such a vast field of contenders, name
recognition will likely be the deciding factor for many voters. The Jewish
controlled media controls name recognition, and thus controls the election.
Much the same thing happened in the
Illinois Senate race, in which Barack Obama, against all odds, was eventually
elected. Jack Ryan won the Republican primary inspite of his scandal, because
in the cluttered field, his name stood out. But the party and the press forced
him out. Then Bill Kristol's old friend Alan Keyes parachuted into Illinois at
the behest of the Republican Party—an obviously bad choice. Keyes repeatedly
made an ass of himself, ensuring Obama the victory.
In the Presidential primaries, many
voters will scan the shelf of candidates and choose the brand they have seen in
the commercials. It is a betrayal of the American voter, but it works, and in
politics, that is all that counts.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
A Weaker Dollar
Will Change the Nature of Immigration to America, and Emigration from America,
Resulting in a Demographic Shift
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
As the American dollar declines, it
becomes less profitable for Europeans to emigrate to the United States to earn money
to send to, or to take back to Europe where the dollar is increasingly losing
value when exchanged. The weakening dollar is also encouraging Europeans to
leave the United States and head for Europe, where their earnings will have
more value.
These jobs are being filled by Latin
Americans and Asians, many of whom enter America illegally. Severe costs and
debts accrue to the American taxpayer as a result of this changing demographic
in immigration and emigration. The Latinization of the United States with
illegal immigration coming from our southern neighbors makes it easier for the
Jewish bankers to destroy the national sovereignty of the USA. These Latins are
being schooled by the bankers' agents in Communism, which they will
deliberately spread to the US.
A weakened America is far more
susceptible to Communist subversion. If we fail to take control of our currency
through our government, and fail to help our southern neighbors to help
themselves, the American experiment will be washed away by the red tidal wave
currently swelling in Latin America, and the Jewish bankers will sucker us into
adopting another form of their currency, be it an international currency which
will make it possible for the Jewish bankers to create an international
depression almost overnight, or a ruinous "gold backed"
"American" currency which will further enrich them while depleting
American wealth and leaving us vulnerable to a sharp contraction of the money
supply and deadly deflation. The solution is for the American Government to issue the
American People our own money based on our productive capability and needs.
The Jewish bankers have taught some
of their agents this path to economic growth. The Jewish bankers taught Adolf Hitler that the "Gold Standard" and
privately held central banks are among the Jewish bankers' methods of robbing
nations of their wealth.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
The Hearts and
Minds of the Turks
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Ataturk is revered by some Turks, so
revered in fact, that to honor him, they have retired his name and forbid its
use by anyone other than the original Mustafa Kemal "Ataturk". Ataturk
is seen as the guardian of the Turkish People from the corruption of internal
politics, especially religious internal politics, and external forces. Ataturk
is seen as the symbol of Turkish modernity, Turkish Europeanism, and Turkish
identity as an example to the rest of Islam of progress, of moving forward
rather than backward. The Turks know that he hailed from Salonika, but do not know that
he was a crypto-Jew. Those Turks who honor Ataturk take great comfort in
their belief that someone strong and powerful stood up for the Turkish People
and defended them from all enemies foreign and domestic.
The role of Ataturk as the paternal
guardian of Turkish honor, of Turkish freedom, of Turkish modernity, has been
taken over by the leader of the Turkish Army. He is believed to be completely
apolitical. He stands guard ready to intervene to stomp out any threat to
liberty, sovereignty, security or independence; whether it comes from (in their
perspective) the Talibani Kurds, the Americans, the backward Arabs, or their
own President, Vice President or Chief Prosecutor. The military watches the
watchers and Turks need have no fear because the military is just, honorable
and serves only the interests of the Turkish People without foreign influence
and without political ambitions. The military have not, do not and would not
intervene unless necessary, and then restrict themselves only to doing what is
necessary and appropriate to restore the Turkish Nation to the mission set for
it by Ataturk—in their view. Some Turks feel secure in the fact that the
military does not play around, but executes its role with brutal efficiency to
execute politicians who stray from the principles of the revolution, and to
crush foreign threats, always placing the honor and interests of Turkey above
any other concerns including the desires of America, Britain and Turkey's
Islamic neighbors. If a political leader abuses power, or threatens Turkey and
its people, the Army will take him out, and Ataturkish Turks see this as the
proper function of their military and the safeguard of their liberty.
Ataturkish Turks are caught in a
series of crises and changes in both domestic and international politics. They
see themselves as not only neutral, but indifferent in a hospitable and
respectful way. Do not mess with me and I will not mess with you. Mess with me
and I will kill you, or die trying. What happens in other countries is their business,
and I will not allow other countries to interfere in my business. It would help
the Turkish economy to join the EU, but we are not eager to oblige an
encroaching EU agenda, and are aware of bigotry against us and the fact that
Europeans are not apt to adopt the poor of Turkey.
Turks know that the Europeans are
toying with them and waiting for World War III to begin, so that they can
leverage Turkey's desire to join the EU as an incentive to cajole Turkey to fight
with NATO against Islam. As when the Americans attacked Iraq, Turkish leaders
must turn to their people with two alternatives which appear to be agreeable to
the people. When the Americans attacked Iraq, Turkish leaders sought to placate
the Turkish populace by either opposing the invasion and standing up for the
rights of a Moslem nation, or accepting funds (up front—they did not want to be
fooled twice) which would improve the Turkish economy. It is important in
Turkish politics, as in all politics—but especially in Turkish politics, to
demonstrate a self interest and a general Turkish interest to the Turkish
People as the basis of political decisions.
The increasing fractionalization of
Turkey between Ataturkish Turks and more orthodox Moslems in Turkey is as
unfortunate and unnecessary, as it is deliberate. Turkey should not restrict
religious freedom, nor should it restrict the rights of Turks to be
non-religious or "progressively" religious. Turkey should not be a
military dictatorship, nor should it become a theocracy.
There is a third way, which is yet
under explored. Dogmatism, both that of orthodox Moslems and orthodox
revolutionist Ataturkish Turks, must make way for genuine self interest and
Turkish cohesiveness in the face of numerous threats, foreign and domestic
foreign. Form an alloy whose properties exceed those of the base metals, an
alloy which is strong and resists corrosion, yet is flexible, machinable, and
malleable. Fighting amongst yourselves will only weaken Turkey and discourage foreign
investment and economic growth. Most importantly, shed your naivete, without
abandoning your pride, and learn the truth of your history and realize that the
Army itself must be watched and is under crypto-Jewish control with foreign
interests, and when it comes to human social behavior, everything is political,
including the Turkish military. The Turkish People must watch the watchers. The
Turkish People must gain oversight and power over both the government and the
military.
Turkey lost its empire in two world
wars. A third may consume Turkey itself.
Instead of subverting Turkish
interests in hopes of winning membership in the EU, Turkey should resume its
historic role as a leader among Moslem countries. Turkey should join with Iran
and Saudi Arabia and use its influence to advance modernity in Islam, but not
abandon its unity with other Moslem nations to promote peace and security in
the region. Turkey should strengthen its already strong ties to the US and
Europe by being a wise friend, as opposed to an unwise and obliging friend, a
wise friend who promotes peace, prosperity and unity among Moslems in the
Middle East. Zionists are working very hard to promote civil wars and
international conflicts in the Middle East, and it is only a matter of time before
the "European" Turks find themselves embroiled in these artificial
conflicts and first used by the European Zionists in a way which weakens Turkey
itself, then attacked by them, as has happened many times in the past.
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Friday, May 25, 2007
"Christian" Zionists Undermining American
Interests for the Benefit of Israel
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
John Hagee is subverting American
interests for the sake of Israel. He is pitting American "Christians"
against Islamic nations in order to forward the Israelis' perceived self-interests.
Jesus said,
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."—Matthew 5:9
and,
"Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."—Matthew 26:52
The first President
of the United States, George Washington, stated,
"Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? Can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?
In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim.
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils? Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.
Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people under an efficient government. the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.
Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.
Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.
Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing (with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them) conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied, as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.
In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the strong and lasting impression I could wish; that they will control the usual current of the passions, or prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto marked the destiny of nations. But, if I may even flatter myself that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your welfare, by which they have been dictated."—George Washington's Farewell Address 1796
Listen to John Hagee and his crowd:
Now watch Jews who
sponsor "Christian" Zionism mock the Christian belief in the second
coming of Jesus Christ:
Binyamin
Netanyahu: 7 minutes 28 seconds from the beginning
Zev Chafets on Steven Colbert: 1 minute 2 seconds from the end
Jim Condit, Jr.'s
Lecture, "The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler"
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
On the premier broadcast of
jewishracism.com radio, I interviewed Jim Condit, Jr. and discussed with him
his lecture "The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler" and my book "The
Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein". Jim's lecture can be viewed
for free on Google Video at the following website:
"The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler"
The interview I conducted with Jim
Condit, Jr. can be heard at the following links:
Many of the books to which we refer in
the interview can be found here:
http://www.jewishracism.com/books.htm
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Will "Cosmic
Log" Publish All of My Submissions?
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
I have submitted the following
statement to "Cosmic Log". Perhaps it will persuade the censors to
publish my previous submissions, perhaps not. If not, I will note the fact here
and elsewhere.
It appears that I have, for the
second time, been censored on this forum. I have submitted two articles to
"Cosmic Log", which have not appeared on "Cosmic Log", but
which I have posted here:
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2007/05/on-allen-estersons-defamations.html
and here,
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2007/04/allen-estersons-fallacies-and-fictions.html
I will continue to discredit Allen
Esterson on my blog, though I will not continue to endure censorship on
"Cosmic Log":
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com
Note the ironic fact that I have been
repeatedly defamed for standing up for free speech, and that my defense to
those personal attacks has been censored. Note further that what you are
observing on "Cosmic Log" is absolutely typical of the way Einstein
and his advocates have stifled debate with smear tactics and censorship for 100
years. I present many examples of it from the past in my book "The
Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein":
http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinstein.htm
You have witnessed it before your
very eyes.
I will gladly debate Allen Esterson,
though I will not submit to a forum in which I am censored while others defame
me without my having the ability to respond directly. Now let us see if Allen
Esterson will condemn the censorship of my words and join me in a fair forum.
On Allen
Esterson's Defamations
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Allen Esterson has
now confirmed that he is the person who was posting under his same name at the following
website,
http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_daily_ablution/2005/08/emigration_deba.html
and has given personal details not
likely to be known by others, which confirm his identity as the author of the
defamations against me posted under his name at the Cosmic Log website. He has
affirmed that it is wrong to call people "nasty names" including
"anti-Semitic" and he has confirmed that he is the author of several
articles in which he so labels me. I submitted the following article to Cosmic
Log last night at about 3:00AM my time. We will see if it eventually appears on
the website.
I thank Esterson for correcting my mistaken
attribution of comments to him which were not his, but then we learn that Allen
Esterson wrote the following:
"Writing as Jew, [***] Posted by: Allen Esterson at Aug 4, 2005 5:02:25 PM"
"On the one hand we have people perceiving anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic sentiments all around, on the other hand we have the claims of endemic 'Islamophobia', and that 'America and Britain are at war with Islam'. Let's get past this 'victim' consciousness stuff, and challenge or grapple with people's arguments instead of finding nasty names to call them: 'Jew-baiter', 'anti-Semitic', 'Islamophobic', 'fascist'. . . Posted by: Allen Esterson at Aug 4, 2005 5:50:11 PM"
Is it correct that you, Allen
Esterson, wrote the above comments? If so, why do you not follow your own
advice and why have you repeatedly libeled me in your widespread smear campaign
against me?
Now I will address some of Esterson's
sophistry. Esterson stated,
"Unfortunately there are two possible readings of the word 'racist' in this context, one that is purely descriptive, an attempt to classify different groups of human beings, the other that describes the advocating of discrimination against a particular 'racial' group. Bjerknes fails to distinguish between. [sic]"
Esterson ridiculously parses words to
avoid the issue and the numerous quotations of Einstein's racist remarks found
in my book, which statements by Einstein are clearly "racist" remarks
in both senses of the term Esterson elects to adopt as definitions of the term
"racist". Does Esterson ask me to define each word in the English
language I use, and is he incapable of understanding terms without express
definitions attached to each term?
My charges against Einstein are
factually based and thoroughly proven, and Esterson only demonstrated his ignorance
when he sought to mock them. As for Stachel's comment, my statement in
reference to it was absolutely correct and Esterson simply sophistically
attempts to change the subject, as he so often does, by inappropriately parsing
words. Einstein was notorious for his inconsistencies, and the fact that his
statements were inconsistent on the subject of his racial views, a fact I note
in my book, does not change the fact that Einstein made virulently racist
remarks, promoted anti-Semitism, and promoted a racist, segregationist Zionism,
for which he was the most famous spokesman of the day. I have also proven that
Einstein was repulsed by assimilatory Jewry. Esterson, instead of ceding the
point, elects to prevaricate with sophistry and unnecessarily extend arguments
which were already settled based on the facts.
Esterson loves to condemn me for
standing up for the fundamental human right of freedom of speech and freedom of
thought. He does not contest my arguments, but instead repeatedly smears me
with innuendo. I am not ashamed of the fact that I am an advocate of the human
right of free speech and I will cry out for freedom from every rooftop.
Esterson has the chutzpah to deny
that he was attempting to shoot the messenger when he defamed me to Geraldine
Hilton, and whoever else read his hateful remarks. Esterson writes, and note
that Esterson misrepresents the context of my remark,
"Bjerknes writes: 'It appears that Allen Esterson opts to shoot the messenger with unproven defamations in order to avoid the truthful message I am telling.' In fact the point I was actually making in the passage in question was that Geraldine Hilton (writer/producer of 'Einstein's Wife') indiscriminately copies whole passages in a most unscholarly fashion from any source that accords with the message she is propagating (e.g., sections from Wikipedia and the writer Andrea Gabor). I pointed out that in the instance in question she was quoting a passage by Bjerknes, and that she would no doubt be horrified to find the source of the quotation was someone who posts on the 'Holocaust Revisionism' website CODOH, founded by the Holocaust denier Bradley R. Smith, who attended the notorious 2006 Tehran Holocaust Conference at which he endorsed the following: 'The alleged slaughter of millions of Jews by the Germans during World War II did not happen. The extermination allegation is properly termed a hoax, that is to say, a deliberately contrived falsehood.'"
In contradiction to Esterson's false
claim that I was referring to his defamations against me on another website, I
was referring to Esterson's vicious smears posted on Cosmic Log. He has so
often defamed me with lies, that it must be difficult for him to keep track of
his defamations. He attempts to weasel his way out of the fact that he sleazily
introduced his smear tactics into what ought to be an academic debate, and
attempts to deny that he was shooting the messenger, when it was obvious that
he was doing just that. In addition, his vicious and hateful remarks stand as
an open threat that any who knowingly quote me will be smeared. He is
attempting to render my work taboo.
In point of fact, this is what the
disingenuous smear monger Allen Esterson said, and note that Esterson again
failed to mention my refutations of John Stachel's "review", though
he hypocritically and incorrectly accuses me of being tendentious,
"The link on the Tesla Society webpage indicates that the passage in turn comes from a webpage on the website of Christopher John Bjerknes. Bjerknes is an eccentric anti-semite who posts on a Holocaust denier website. Bjerknes's antipathy to Einstein is indicated by his describing him as the 'chief racist' among the political Zionists of his time, and his writing that 'Einstein hated non-racist Jews'. His book on Einstein received a scathing review from John Stachel. I'm sure that Hilton would be horrified to know that, in regard to the second paragraph she has copied above (which purports to explain away the fact that Joffe clearly cited Einstein as the sole author of the three most celebrated of his 1905 papers), she is citing the arguments of a rabid anti-semite with an intense antipathy to Einstein. That does not, in itself, mean that Bjerknes's contentions in that paragraph are false. Like any assertions, they must be examined on their merits."
http://www.esterson.org/Defending_Einsteins_Wife_Website.htm
Esterson wastes many words confirming
that what I said in my article "Was Einstein an Incestuous Rapist?"
was perfectly correct, while pretending that he, Esterson, has somehow refuted
what I had said. Esterson pretends that by his repeating the correctness of my
assertions he has somehow discredited me, while avoiding all of the points made
in my book and in my article. Esterson does not mention Einstein's perverse
desire to fornicate with his cousin's daughters, or the fact that Einstein was
conducting an incestuous and adulterous relationship with his same cousin,
while seeking to bed her daughters. Esterson seems to miss the salient and
incontestible points that Einstein was a licentious man, who had employed
violence against his family on repeated occasions. Just as Esterson has failed
to condemn Einstein for Einstein's racism, Esterson fails to condemn Einstein
for Einstein's violence, or Einstein's sexual degeneracy, and completely avoids
the issues raised in my book and in my article.
Jewishracism.com
Radio
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
I have decided to
add a new dimension to jewishracism.com with an online interview program. I
would be interested to receive feedback and suggestions, as well as leads and
contact information for potential guests. I was lucky enough to have Jim
Condit, Jr. for my first guest and I hope you enjoy my first broadcast.
Christopher Jon Bjerknes Interviews
Jim Condit, Jr.
May 23, 2007
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
MSNBC's CosmicLog
and Things Zionist and Einstein
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
I invite my
readers to observe events on the message board dubbed "Cosmic Log" to
witness how many of Einstein's defenders obfuscate issues Einstein and rely
upon personal attack and innuendo, instead of reasoned and responsible
argument.
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/11/27/15908.aspx
I have submitted the following
response, and note that one of my previous submissions has not appeared, though
it is quoted in one of my previous blogs:
Note that Allen Esterson, in his
desperation to shoot the messenger and avoid the message, has not once
attempted to address my factually based arguments regarding Mileva Maric.
Instead, he hopes and prays that the statements I have made on other issues,
and supported with thousands of pages of documentation, will shock the
uninformed reader. Esterson only cursorily addresses that evidence in some
instances, while completely ignoring it in others. He opts to mine for points
he believes he can show to be weak, but even there fails to refute my
arguments, but instead offers up his groundless opinion that the facts just are
not good enough for him, though they represent precisely what I have contended
they represent, and Esterson has nowhere shown otherwise.
Why are the issues of Zionism, Jews,
Judaists and Jewish and Zionist racism so fascinating for our Allen Esterson,
and why does he race (no pun intended) to Einstein's defense instead of
condemning Einstein for Einstein's virulent racism and segregationism? Why does
Esterson ignore the many racist things Albert Einstein stated, for example
Einstein's assertion, which is a commonly expressed racist Zionist myth, that
anti-Semitism is good for the Jews, in that it keeps Jews segregated?
In search of answers to these
questions, I found that Allen Esterson wrote the following Herzlian Zionist
nonsense:
"Posted by: Allen Esterson at Aug 4, 2005 5:02:25 PM [***] Whether you prefer to think of anti-Semitism as a virus or a cancer, the reality is that almost two thousand years of bloody and bitter history has shown that it is utterly incurable, and thus, the only really effective method of combating anti-Semitism is not the JDL or the courts but aliya."
Esterson also stated:
"Posted by: Allen Esterson at Aug 4, 2005 5:50:11 PM [***] And I don't believe it's incorrect to describe Islamist theocratic aspirations as at least akin to fascism."
These quotations are found here:
http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_daily_ablution/2005/08/emigration_deba.html
In reference to his first point, I
note that Esterson posts from London. America has never been a hotbed of
anti-Semitism, in part because Zionist Jews have never made a concerted effort
to sponsor anti-Semitism in America, as they did in Germany when they funded
Adolf Hitler and praised his segregationist policies. One way to combat
anti-Semitism is to abandon such Zionist myths as the lie that anti-Semitism is
inevitable and necessitates Jewish segregation in a "world ghetto"--to
use Herzl's phrase, which lie is a defamation against all of humanity. There is
nothing inherent in the DNA of Jews which would make Jews the natural and
inevitable targets of hatred, nor is segregation any kind of a solution to
anti-Semitism.
Esterson fails to acknowledge the
fact that Judaist theocratic aspirations inspired Islam, and call for the
enslavement of non-Jews, and a world-wide government ruled by a Jewish King
from Jerusalem, as proven below. Is Esterson ignorant of Jewish messianic beliefs?
Esterson quotes a passage from one of
my works, The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, which states at pages
65-66:
"The Jewish genocide of Armenian Christians makes for a good case study of classical and cultural Jewish racism and Jewish deception. It demonstrates the highly developed Jewish arts of genocide, war and control of public opinion to do evil while appearing to be the victim, scapegoating others for Jewish crimes, etc."
http://www.jewishracism.com/JewishGenocide.pdf
Esterson omits to mention that I
prove these facts in my books. I quote directly from Jewish texts which define
the Jewish People as if a "chosen people" above all others
(Deuteronomy 7:6), who must not intermarry or interbreed with allegedly
inferior races (Exodus 34:16. Deuteronomy 7:2-3. Ezra 9. Nehemiah 9:2; 13:3,
23-30), which Jews are destined to rule the world (Exodus 19:5-6. Numbers
24:17-20; 33:50-56. Deuteronomy 7:6; 28:10. Psalm 2:1-12 (see also: Sukkah 52).
Psalm 18:40-50; 72:8-11; 110:1-7. Isaiah 2:1-4; 9:6-7; 11:4, 9-10; 40:23; 42:1;
49:7, 23; 60:12; 61:6, 9; 65; 66. Jeremiah 3:17; 10:10. Ezekiel 39:17-18. Micah
4:2-3;17:16-17. Zechariah 8:20-23;14:9), and which Jews must exterminate the
"Amalekites" (read Armenians) in an absolute murderous genocide
(Exodus 17:14-16. Numbers 24:17-20. Deuteronomy 25:17-19. I Samuel 15:1-35.
Malachi 1:1-14. Sanhedrin 20b), ultimately leaving only the
"righteous" left alive, meaning obedient Jews and Goyim who slavishly
submit to Jewish world rule and the Noahide Laws which forbid Christianity
(Sanhedrin 56-60, 99. Zechariah 8:20-23. Shabbath 32b). I cite many examples of
Jewish deception, including that of the crypto-Jew Esther, who committed
genocide, and other crypto-Jews who committed genocide, most especially the
"Young Turk" old Jews who perpetrated the Jewish genocide of Armenian
Christians. I document Theodor Herzl's accounts that he would employ a corrupt
"Jewish press" to control the fate of the Sultan of Turkey.
Esterson does not dispute the facts I
present, nor does he question the logic of my conclusions. Does not Esterson
find the Armenian Genocide an act of evil? Does he dispute the fact that it was
perpetrated by crypto-Jews deceptively calling themselves "Young
Turks"? Does he dispute the fact that today influential Jews and Jewish
organizations are attempting to quiet talk of the Armenian Genocide, and have
exercised undue influence in governments and media to do so? Why is Allen
Esterson, who avers that Aliya is the only option for Jews to combat
anti-Semitism, attempting to render my work taboo, when it has been so valuable
to so many, including Alberto Martinez, upon whom Esterson relies?
Now onto Einstein's overt racism and his
evil belief that anti-Semitism is good for Jews. I will pull a few of the many
quotations by Einstein, and those who knew Einstein, found in my book The
Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, many of which passages appear in
concentrated form here:
http://www.jewishracism.com/Albert_Einstein.pdf
and note that Esterson nowhere
acknowledges the fact that I fully support my contentions regarding Einstein's
virulent Zionist racism with verifiable facts:
"Anti-Semitism will be a psychological phenomenon as long as Jews come in contact with non-Jews—what harm can there be in that? Perhaps it is due to anti-Semitism that we survive as a race: at least that is what I believe."--A. Einstein, English translation by A. Engel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 7, Document 37, Princeton University Press, (2002), p. 159.
"Antisemitism must be seen as a real thing, based on true hereditary qualities, even if for us Jews it is often unpleasant. I could well imagine that I myself would choose a Jew as my companion, given the choice. On the other hand I would consider it reasonable for the Jews themselves to collect the money to support Jewish research workers outside the universities and to provide them with teaching opportunities."--A. Einstein as quoted in M. Born, The Born-Einstein Letters, Walker and Company, New York, (1971), p. 16.
"[The Allied Powers] whose victory during the war I had felt would be by far the lesser evil are now proving to be only slightly the lesser evil. [***] I get most joy from the emergence of the Jewish state in Palestine. It does seem to me that our kinfolk really are more sympathetic (at least less brutal) than these horrid Europeans. Perhaps things can only improve if only the Chinese are left, who refer to all Europeans with the collective noun 'bandits.'"-- Letter from A. Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest of 22 March 1919, English translation by A. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 9, Document 10, Princeton Univsersity Press, (2004), pp. 9-10, at 10.
"With adults it is quite similar as with children. Due to race and temperament as well as traditions (which are only to a small extent of religious origin) they form a community more or less separate from non-Jews. [***] It is this basic community of race and tradition that I have in mind when I speak of 'Jewish nationality.' In my opinion, aversion to Jews is simply based upon the fact that Jews and non-Jews are different. [***] Where feelings are sufficiently vivid there is no shortage of reasons; and the feeling of aversion toward people of a foreign race with whom one has, more or less, to share daily life will emerge by necessity."--A. Einstein, English translation by A. Engel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 7, Document 34, Princeton University Press, (2002), pp. 153-155, at 153-154.
"I am neither a German citizen, nor is there in me anything that can be described as 'Jewish faith.' But I am happy to belong to the Jewish people, even though I don't regard them as the Chosen People. Why don't we just let the Goy keep his anti-Semitism, while we preserve our love for the likes of us?"--A. Einstein quoted in A. Foelsing, English translation by E. Osers, Albert Einstein, a Biography, Viking, New York, (1997), p. 494.
"JUST WHAT IS A JEW? The formation of groups has an invigorating effect in all spheres of human striving, perhaps mostly due to the struggle between the convictions and aims represented by the different groups. The Jews, too, form such a group with a definite character of its own, and anti-Semitism is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jews by the Jewish group. This is a normal social reaction. But for the political abuse resulting from it, it might never have been designated by a special name. What are the characteristics of the Jewish group? What, in the first place, is a Jew? There are no quick answers to this question. The most obvious answer would be the following: A Jew is a person professing the Jewish faith. The superficial character of this answer is easily recognized by means of a simple parallel. Let us ask the question: What is a snail? An answer similar in kind to the one given above might be: A snail is an animal inhabiting a snail shell. This answer is not altogether incorrect; nor, to be sure, is it exhaustive; for the snail shell happens to be but one of the material products of the snail. Similarly, the Jewish faith is but one of the characteristic products of the Jewish community. It is, furthermore, known that a snail can shed its shell without thereby ceasing to be a snail. The Jew who abandons his faith (in the formal sense of the word) is in a similar position. He remains a Jew. [***] WHERE OPPRESSION IS A STIMULUS [***] Perhaps even more than on its own tradition, the Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world. Here undoubtedly lies one of the main reasons for its continued existence through so many thousands of years."--A. Einstein, "Why do They Hate the Jews?", Collier's, Volume 102, (26 November 1938); reprinted in Ideas and Opinions, Crown, New York, (1954), pp. 191-198, at 194, 196.
"To deny the Jew's nationality in the Diaspora is, indeed, deplorable. If one adopts the point of view of confining Jewish ethnical nationalism to Palestine, then one, to all intents and purposes, denies the existence of a Jewish people. In that case one should have the courage to carry through, in the quickest and most complete manner, entire assimilation. We live in a time of intense and perhaps exaggerated nationalism. But my Zionism does not exclude in me cosmopolitan views. I believe in the actuality of Jewish nationality, and I believe that every Jew has duties towards his coreligionists. [***] [T]he principal point is that Zionism must tend to strengthen the dignity and self-respect of the Jews in the Diaspora. I have always been annoyed by the undignified assimilationist cravings and strivings which I have observed in so many of my friends."--A. Einstein, "Jewish Nationalism and Anti-Semitism", The Jewish Chronicle, (17 June 1921), p. 16.
Oprah Winfrey
Lends Her Support to Apartheid Israel, a Nation Which Is Committing Genocide
Against the Palestinian People
In the News:
Monday, May 21, 2007
The Israeli
Vampires Flap Their Slimy Wings and Bare Their Toxic Fangs
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
In violation of the most fundamental
principles of civilized behavior, the barbaric, racist and genocidal Israelis
promise to murder the leaders of the Palestinians. Instead of lifting their
inhuman embargoes on the Palestinians, instead of ending their seige of the
Palestinians, instead of ceasing to fund and foment civil war, instead of
living in peace and brotherhood with their neighbors; the poisonous Israelis
are openly threatening to murder the political leaders of the Palestinian
People. The Israelis are doing everything in their power to make the life of
the average Palestinian hell, so as to provoke them to violence so that the
racist and homocidal Israelis can blame the Palestinians for the Israeli
genocide of the Palestinians.
The depraved Israelis degrade and murder Palestinian women and
children. The bloodthirsty Israelis only recently carried out a deliberate
premeditated aggressive assault on defenseless Lebanon, whose government they
had first subverted with treacherous puppets, and whose land the Israeli Jews
wish to steal. The kleptomaniacal Israelis have countless Mossad agents
provocatuer operating in Lebanon and Palestine to provoke civil wars and to
carry out and foment insignificant attacks on Israel, which the Israelis then
use as a pretext to commit genocidal attacks on Palestine and Lebanon. It is
difficult to imagine a more reprehensible people than the Jews of Israel.
In the News:
Cabinet gives IDF green light to target Hamas politicians
Israel threatens to kill Hamas leaders
Previous Posts
·
The
Double Standards of Zionist Neo-ConArtist Cond...
·
Enlarged
Second Edition of "The Jewish Genocide of...
·
Television
Interview Covering "The Jewish Genocide...
·
Maddening
Madness in the Republican Presidential D...
·
Barack
Obama: By Definition an Israel-Firster
·
In
Politics, Name Recognition Is Darn Near Everyth...
Archived Posts
·
May 2007
Informative Links
·
Videos
·
News
·
Mosaic TV- News
From the Middle East
·
Wing TV
·
Current Issues with Hesham Tillawi
·
The Last Throes of U.S. Empire
·
B'Tselem
·
Council for the National Interest
·
Palestinian Center for Human Rights
·
Judaism: the ideology Behind
Occupation
·
C-Span
