On the Refusal of the U.S. Holocaust Museum to Create a Scientific Replica of an Auschwitz "Gas Chamber"

ON THE REFUSAL OF THE U.S. HOLOCAUST MUSEUM TO CREATE A SCIENTIFIC REPLICA OF A HOMICIDAL AUSCHWITZ "GAS CHAMBER"

Let's scrutinize the psychology of Shoah business belief. A classic case is the response of Kari Nenonen in Helsinki, Finland. For Nenonen, proof of the Nazi homicidal gas chambers is one "murdered human being" and "many little villages where Jewish culture prevailed...before the Nazis came."

Here is the mentality created by the "Holocaust" neologism in action. Before Elie Wiesel canonized this Newspeak, specific reference was made to separate allegations: six million dead, massacres by military units, deaths by gassings etc.

After "Holocaust" Newspeak was imposed, the equation became evanescent: a labyrinth prosecution case which shifted from bars of soap to nights of broken glass, deportations, shower heads, shootings and diesel engines. If a skeptic doubts one, he is accused of doubting them all, a convenient device for caricaturing precise questions as the denial of an ontological enormity: denial of history, denial of "The Holocaust."

If we perhaps happen to look too closely at the claim of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz, someone such as Nenonen summons the spectre of emptyJewish villages. If we ask for a representation of the miraculous weapon of mass death, the reply is, "one dead body is enough."

When Dr. Robert Faurisson elicits from the director of the U.S. Holocaust Museum the remarkable fact that the weapon of the genocide is not represented nor will it be represented, the reaction of the true believer is not to demand of Director Berenbaum, to know why the museum is afraid to represent the Auschwitz homicidal gas chambers, which were supposedly "witnessed by several hundreds of thousands of people," but to furnish alibis for its absence.

Those who point up the absurdity of a museum devoted to genocide by means of poison gas chambers that does not make any attempt at reconstructing a technically and historically accurate model or replica, are dismissed as heretics or, in the Newspeak term imposed by thought cop Deborah Lipstadt, "Holocaust deniers."

That phrase of Lipstadt's is redolent of theology and that's the realm to which this subject must be confined, lest the right to question and doubt is claimed by more people.

With the aid of Tinsel Town hate-the-Germans cinema, reason has been put to sleep in this matter. The U.S. Holocaust Museum authorities dare not represent a Nazi homicidal gas chamber because by such representation the miraculous becomes prosaic and the hoax of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz (note bene I did not say "Holocaust hoax"), descends to earth, for all to compare against the scriptures of the "Survivors" (saints) who have described the miraculous weapon (i.e. rumors from alleged percipients).

By this process, religious dogma is undone; hence the refusal—quite correct from the point of view of theology--to replicate a Nazi homicidal gas chamber at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C.