RevisionistHistory.org

archives / bookstore / news / home


The most radically enlightening revisionist books, tapes, CDs, DVDs and newsletters in the land are here, at our secure online Bookstore

Your privacy is guaranteed. 100% secure online revisionist bookstore.


Iran, the West and Blowback

Holocaustolatry does not play well in the Third World

by Michael A. Hoffman II

I'm going to spare you any lengthy sampling of western reaction to the Iranian president's prophetic remarks on Dec. 13, about Europe's Holocaustolatry. Moscow, Washington and Berlin are taking the lead in seeing who can outshine the other in denouncing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and threatening sanctions by the European Union and even the UN. This is all pro forma barking which these lap dogs must perform on their hind legs. It is unworthy of verbatim citation, being clownish and servile in the extreme.

The uproar about "Holocaust denial" by President Ahmadinejad is racist to the core. Deborah Lipstadt has subjected the German survivors of the Allied firebombing holocaust in Dresden, Germany to withering scorn, contempt and outright denial, boldly asserting that no holocaust occurred there.

Holocaust denial by Judaics is legitimate, protected speech, because German victims are less than zero in Talmudic eyes. This is true as well of Palestinian victims of the Israeli holocaust against them. One may mock, diminish, suppress and deny Israeli mass murder and the western world will go on its merry way.

What is at stake in this controversy is the exalted status of a master caste of Holy People who alone among the nations of the world, have immunity from empirical and scientific skepticism, such as Lipstadt applies to Dresden and Peres and Sharon apply to the Jenin massacre of 2002, which they call a myth, with no fear of sanctions by the European Union or the UN.

If denial of a holocaust is a crime, and an offense against decency, what then do we do about widespread denial of the Allied and Israeli holocausts against German civilians in WWII and Palestinian civilians in the 21st century?

The Third World is far more sane than the West. Oh, yes, I know, your television is constantly showing you images of car-bombing and suicide-bombing Arabs and from that minuscule slice of the Muslim pie you deduce that Arabs are wild animals etc.

In fact, America and especially Europe are death cultures with self-extinguishing birth rates, i.e. deaths and abortions exceed live births among indigenous whites. People who do not have sufficient spark to reproduce their race are profoundly sick. While Europeans have sleek cars, and trains that run on time, and pride themselves on their hygiene and modernity, they are in fact mentally ill and one manifestation of that pathology, is their support for the infallible religion of Holocaustianity.

Having long ago rejected the infallibility of the Catholic popes, they have now embraced the infallibility of various Judaic popes, from Elie Wiesel to Abe Foxman and the Lubavtich chief rabbi of Russia, to name but a few. None of the wild statements about gas chambers by these religious fanatics may be weighed in the scale of science or historical research. To assess them is mortal sin, abomination and anathema. Abortion, contraception, greed, hatred of the family, these are no longer sins, because the Bible is no longer a document that compels any serious mass allegiance in Europe. The gas chambers alone exert the power of the holy relics of yore, and hence we have the spectacle of half-nude hedonists genuflecting in pious awe before the mystic holy grail that is Auschwitz.

One conceit of modern Europe is its sense of its penchant for irreverent satire. It no longer expresses its superiority over the Third World overtly, as it once did, through philosophy or colonization. In its conceit, it conceives of its superiority nowadays mainly by means of mockery. The Third Worldlings are "so serious and uptight about religion and moral codes," unlike the supposedly free-wheeling, free-thinking Europeans, who delight in satirizing fundamentalism.

This conceit is exploded when we watch the terminal case of rabies which Europe's Zionist lapdogs exhibit in the face of Iran's profanation of "Holocuast" fundamentalism. The shoe is on the other foot and the Europeans cannot take the medicine they dish out when approved heretics like Theo Van Gogh are attacked by Muslims. When marginalized heretics like Ernst Zundel, David Irving and the president of Iran are attacked by Judaics, Europe's radical pioneers of the frontiers of liberal freethought crawl back into their claustrophobic holes.

This is not lost on the Third World! At a fundamental level, the people of the developing countries are still alive, still busy tending to life--and therefore to the future-- having babies, rearing large families and husbanding the culture that attends that most natural of vocations. They cannot be made to swallow the UN's selective "Holocaust" mythos. To them it is a preposterous, racist and self-indicting set of legends.

A former member of the city council of Tehran, quoted in the Los Angeles Times on Dec. 15, gives voice to what tens of millions are feeling throughout the Middle East, Asia and Africa: "One of Ahmadinejad's former colleagues on the Tehran City Council...said the Iranian leader truly believed what he said, as do many in the Muslim world. 'This (the 'Holocaust') is a scenario created by the West to justify their strategic interests to take part of Palestine,' Amir Reza Vaezi-Ashtiani said of Israel's existence. 'If it wasn't true, the West wouldn't hurt so bad and react so strongly."

Please read that last sentence again.

The Zionists and their masonic errand boys and rainbow girls are reputed to be cunning chess players, but one of their fatal traits is over-reaction to criticism. As the Israeli lobbyists and ambassadors ring telephones and fax machines around the world, demanding ever greater escalation of anti-Iranian rhetoric, they are confirming every word uttered by the President of Iran on December 13.

The Third World, though deprived of high definition television and e-mail and cell phones, still knows what Americans and Europeans who are wired to the data hive, do not: that the West sheds not a tear for the survivors of the El Khiam concentration camp operated by Israeli proxies in Lebanon, for the survivors of Ariel Sharon's firebombing holocaust of Beirut in 1982, or for the grieving family of Elie Hobeika, a witness against Sharon in a proposed Belgian war crimes trial who was silenced by Israeli assassins before he could testify.

This double standard, this Talmudic racism, is seared into the guts of the people of the Third World to such an extent that no Spielbergian fantasy, no American bribe, no European threat, can shake it from their bowels.

Like their attachment to their children, their tribe and their soil, for these Arabs, Muslims, Persians, Asians, Africans--and for that matter, many Latin Americans-- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is bound to be esteemed as the articulator of their rage against a western machine that has steam-rolled their economies and self-determination for hundreds of years.

Be careful Europeans, Israelis and Americans about how hard you hit Iran on behalf of your fanatical Holocaustolatry --which you hold above God, the prophets and freedom of speech itself-- beware to what extent you attempt to humiliate the Iranian people and their elected head of state. The blowback may surprise you, and not just in the Middle East.

Links

"Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Prophet and Satirist"

The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians


RevisionistHistory.org

archives / news / home