* The single greatest
indicator of an area's crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and
ethnicity.
The Color of Crime: Study
on Racial Differences Released
By Nicholas Stix (10/06/05)
Imagine if one demographic group
in America were 33 times more prone to commit crimes than another group. How
would you feel about the relatively crime-prone group? The relatively
crime-free group? Wouldn’t you want to know about such differences?
But we don’t have to
imagine anything. The above contrast was not a hypothetical case, but rather
the statistical relationship of black to Asian crime in America, as detailed in
the new report, The Color of Crime, released by the New Century Foundation, the
organization that sponsors American Renaissance magazine.
* Between 2001 and 2003,
blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than
the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
* Between 2001 and 2003,
blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while
whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.
* Of the nearly 770,000
violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites,
blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
But there are
five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be
reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be
equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists
never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.)
* Nationally, youth gangs
are 90 percent non-white. Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be
members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine
times more likely.
* The only crime category
in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling.
* Blacks commit more
violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their
victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When
whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
But how can that be, when
for years commentators of all political persuasions have insisted that the
majority of the victims of black crime are themselves black? But it has been
true for some time, because blacks increasingly target whites based on the
color of the latter’s skin. The commentators have been guilty variously of
lying or laziness.
* Far from being guilty of ‘racially
profiling’ innocent blacks, police have been exercising racial bias on behalf
of blacks, arresting fewer blacks than their proportion of criminals: blacks who committed crimes that were reported
to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other
races who committed the same crimes.
* Police are determined to
arrest non-black rather than black criminals. (I have seen this practice in
operation on the streets and subways of New York.)
* [Blacks] are eight times
more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5
times more likely to steal a car.
Well, as everyone knows,
innocent blacks get rounded up by the police all the time, so we can safely
ignore such statistics. After all, isn’t that what the NAACP, Village Voice,
New York Times, and countless black ‘activists’ and prominent academics have
been saying for years? And although the folks insisting on the reality of
racial profiling have no facts to back up their claims, they enjoy political
prestige and moral authority. The Color of Crime, meanwhile, is based merely on
lowly facts. As we shall see, prominent people are already saying that we
should ignore The Color of Crime, because it wasn’t produced by the right sort
of people. (And of course, the ‘right sort of people’ never tells the truth
about race and crime.)
* Charges of racial
profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for
traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland’s Public Service
Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders
(23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, blacks
were twice as likely to speed as whites in general, and there was an even
higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range.
* The only evidence for
police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics
say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime
rates, not police misconduct.â€
* Blacks not only commit
violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more
violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to
commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault
with knives.
* Blacks not only commit
violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit ‘white collar’
offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at
two to five times the white rate.
* The single greatest
indicator of an areas crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and
ethnicity. Even when one controls for income, the black crime rate is much
higher than the white rate.
Read full article here:
http://www.americandaily.com/article/9584
______________________________
But even more important is
that this "study" LEAVES OUT a very important "ethnic
group" ---- the "jews".
How "privileged"
are they, when they get the SCHOOLS THEY WANT, THE JOBS THEY WANT, THE
PLACEMENT THEY WANT, THE POSITIVE PUBLICITY THEY WANT ----------- WHEN THEY CAN
DO...
... ANYTHING ...
THEY WANT, AND GET AWAY
WITH IT.
THE BIGGEST HEROINE DRUG
LORD IS "Jewish" (Ashkenazi Khazar), but guess what happen when he
was CAUGHT by American police on US land????!!!!
He was 'deported' to CLUB
MED ISRAEL, where he WALKS AS A FREE MAN!!!!!!! No jail sentence, NOTHING !!!!!
What about the 5 DANCING
ISRAELIS ON 911????!!!!!!
Or the ISRAELI
"ART" STUDENTS (aka SUSPECTS)?????!!!!!!
What about LARRY "THE
FRIGGIN' FALSE-FLAG PROFITEER" SILVERSTEIN ??????!!!!!!!!
The Great
Revealer | Thu, 2007-09-20 19:58