|
|
WHEREVER THEY MAY BE © 1972, The
Beate Klarsfeld Foundation
| |
|
|
|
Back |
|
Contents |
Page 162 |
|
Home
Page |
Forward |
|
|
|
were thought to be old because they had held such
high positions; everyone forgot that Nazism banked on the energy of its young
people. Franz Six did not reach forty until 1949. Helmut Knochen, his disciple
and later his protégé in the S.D. and the RSHA, was only thirty
one years old when Heydrich made him head of the S.D.-Security Police in
Occupied France.
Knochen was brought back to Paris in 1947 and tried,
along with General Karl Oberg, the top man in the S.S. and the German police
force in France. In view of the heinous crimes of which they were accused, the
only possible sentence was death. The sooner the trial took place, the more
likely the sentence would be carried out.
But Six had become a powerful
person again, and he remained loyal to Knochen.
At that time the United
States had considerable influence in France, and so Knochen and Oberg were not
tried until 1954. They smiled when they heard the death sentence pronounced,
confident that it was merely a formality. It was, in fact, commuted to life
imprisonment. And in 1962, at the time of the reconciliation between Adenauer
and de Gaulle, the Chancellor, among other things, had a chance to oblige the
powerful Six. The two S.S. chiefs were pardoned and returned to Germany.
Knochen and Oberg were exceptions; the vast majority of German war
criminals were not even arrested. When the Federal Republic became practically
independent in 1954, the problem of punishing these criminals became acute. A
number of them had been convicted in absentia by a French military tribunal.
Preliminary investigations that had been suspended in France were now speeded
up so that once the Paris Agreements were signed, there would be no more cases
to investigate.
From September 1944 to October 1954, a total of 1,026
Germans were convicted in absentia for war crimes. The French authorities then
rightly feared that if the German courts acquired jurisdiction over these war
criminals, the courts would prove very lenient. Due to the influence of the
numerous Nazi judges still on the bench, a criminal who had been sentenced to
death could benefit in Germany from having his case dismissed or from receiving
just a token punishment. That is why, in Article 3 of the October 29, 1954,
Agreement, France denied German courts access to its non-classified files on
German war criminals. Those who had been tried in France, therefore, could not
be tried again in the Federal Republic. Once the Agreement was signed, the
criminals
|
|
|
| |
|
WHEREVER THEY MAY BE © 1972, The
Beate Klarsfeld Foundation |
|
Back |
Page 162 |
Forward |
|
|