 |
|
How many employees were there?
I work at a fairly small company; my department is about ten people.
We don't try to do nearly as much as these fantastic Jewish forgers
must have.
|
|
|
I mean, those guys must have been productive! Draftspeople to forge
plans
for the buildings, chemists to decide how the Nazis would have
done the killing, authors to write fake diaries of the Sonderkommando
and bury them at Auschwitz (to remain undiscovered for decades) ...
voice talent and audio engineers to forge Himmler's hours-long
Poznan speeches,
writers to decide who would have written
what memos to whom, and the typists -- good heavens, can you imagine the
number of typists the whole Operation Jewish Forgery would have
required!? They literally had to forge the entire workings of a
small but significant part of the German government for four or five years.
Right down to the endless pages detailing which military groups took
which positions and how many Jews they killed, rows and rows of small
numbers, tabulated, formulated. They must have intercepted the
actual routes that the Einsatzgruppen took, figured out which
prisoners they took, forged documents saying that they'd executed all
the Jews, and then inserted the forgeries into the appropriate
places. Wow. That's a lot of work. Hundreds of
Einsatzgruppen reports
to forge. And that's just the Einsatzgruppen, that's just
a million or so murders to report. Multiply that times ten,
that's the scale we're talking.
Somehow the Jews got their Jew agents to be there when this forged
evidence was presented to Hoess and Broad and Kremer and all the
dozens of Nazis tried in 1945 and 1946. All of them must have had
the same initial reaction: "what!? I never wrote that!?" but the Jew
agents, of course, slapped them around a bit until they admitted it
was true. And the Jew agents were very good, because every single one
of them admitted that it was true. Those agents must have been quite
good at making Nazis admit things, because a lot of those Nazis were
seasoned military men. Where'd they hire those agents from?
They found a few thousand Jews who were willing to lie
through their teeth and say that Auschwitz was an extermination camp, not a
concentration camp. They must have held a big meeting, gathered all
the survivors together, and briefed them. "OK," the Head Jew would
have said, "repeat after me: Auschwitz was not a nice place to live.
You did not go swimming at Auschwitz. Auschwitz used its morgues
to gas people. In the summer of 1944 they burned bodies in ditches.
Everyone on the left, you actually saw people being led to the gas
chambers. You on the right, you did not, but you heard a lot about
it." And so on.
All in all, the survivors did a good job of
remembering their instructions. Sure, some of them went overboard
and started talking about huge clouds of smoke billowing out of the
crematories when it was actually pretty smoke-free. In fact these
minor slip-ups would be the only way that, decades later,
revisionists would deduce that they were lying. So overall,
they all stuck to their story remarkably well.
And then they did the same thing over and over, for the trials in
the 1950s and 1960s. Even for trails that took place in Germany, the
Jewish agents found a way to torture innocent German defendants in
German jail cells into confessing, before a German court, to crimes
they didn't commit.
Most crafty of all, the Jews didn't forge documents that would
provide hard links from Hitler to the gas chambers. They refused
to forge a "Führer Order" that would indict Hitler. They
pretended the gassings were cloaked in secrecy, so they forged
documents that spoke only in code-words, and then other documents to
link the code-words to murder.
Rather than forge an inventory of the gas chamber in which it was
called a "gas chamber," they forged an inventory for a morgue which
listed 17 showerheads -- and then let it remain undiscovered for
years until researchers realized its importance!
The ultimate in sneaky!
|
My department at my company generates a lot of paperwork. We don't
magically all agree how we're going to approach a task, and then
simply do it -- I wish it worked that way, but it doesn't! Working
together requires constant communication. We have meetings all the
time; sometimes it seems like I spend entire days doing nothing but
meeting and talking about when next to meet and sending notes about
future meetings and photocopying proposals. And my department, from
what I hear, is small potatoes for bureaucracy, we're remarkably
informal.
|
|
|
This whole Jewish-forgery operation must have generated a lot of
paperwork as well. How many people must it have taken to do all
this? Fifty people? Hell, they'd need fifty typists. A hundred?
A thousand?
No, a lot more than that. There are literally
truckloads of documentation, and forging the documentation is easy
compared to delivering it to the right places, and figuring out who
did what, what to forge, and who to falsely accuse, and making
all of it fit together.
Making it all fit is the toughest part. The false can't
contradict the true documents in the record, and has to have
corroborating documents as well. For every document showing a
nugget of direct implication, there must be a dozen that relate
indirectly, and a hundred other documents have to be checked and
cross-checked to verify everything fits.
Ten thousand people, maybe?
|
And here I'll drop the fantasy-italics, because here's where the
fantasy meets the reality. I'm told that Microsoft employees send and
receive a million email messages a week. Let's say that Operation
Jewish Forgery was about as big as Microsoft is. They would have
needed approximately as many communications as Microsoft does.
Let's say
that about half of those were oral, and that they succeeded in burning
99.9% of the written ones. That leaves about 500,000 written
communications between the members of this fantasy Operation Jewish
Forgery. And, counting the survivors who'd been briefed on their stories,
the Nazis who were paid off to go along with the whole thing, and the
forgers themselves, I figure there were something like 20,000 people
after the war who knew about Operation Jewish Forgery.
500,000 documents, and 20,000 witnesses. As a very rough guess.
Here's my question to you, "revisionist scholars."
Where are they?
Where are all these documents of the forgery? Where are all the witnesses
to this scam operation? Oh sure, we understand that you think most Jews
are such liars and cheats that, even if they weren't briefed on the
"Holohoax," they'd go along with it anyway just to get money for Israel.
But would all Jews go along with the story? Wouldn't you think that
somewhere, maybe, there would be a few honest Jews who would admit that
they'd been pulling the wool over our eyes?
Where are they?
Or is this some insane conspiracy theory, where the very
lack of evidence only proves how insidious the conspirators
were?
These pieces of paper, the one in a thousand that hypothetically
survived. They must be scattered throughout Eastern Europe, little
scraps of paper that say things like "Dear Isaac -- please don't forget
to leak Document 495B-14 to the London Times on August 13, as we
agreed. Signed, Abraham."
Where are they?
Show me anything. I want one memo between members of Operation Jewish
Forgery, one written piece of evidence that something went on. I want
one inmate of Auschwitz to come forward and said that there was no
gassing going on, that it was a big hoax. (Christophersen and Stäglich
come closest, but they were, as they admit, nowhere near the gas
chambers: they were interned in different subcamps.
Christophersen
was growing dandelions a mile away from Birkenau. Did anyone get in
touch with them after the war and tell them to lie about what they saw?
Of course not; they never say any such thing.)
I don't insist of having a top-of-the-line smoking gun, the one
document that proves not only the conspiracy but exactly what it was
doing. I just want some corroborating evidence, even a little bit.
I'm not talking about a report about Rudolf Höss being beaten
up. Nobody is surprised that accused war criminals were often
mistreated by their captors. But if I'm supposed to believe he was
tortured, and his family threatened, in order to make him tell a
specific story -- how about something from the conspirators who
organized the beating? How about a document sent to, from, or about
his family? How about anything that will verify, or even hint at, the
existence of the conspirators?
I don't think I'm out of line in asking for one little detail about
how this huge forging operation was carried out. Not when Mr. Berg
makes demands on his opponents like:
Surely, the hatemongers can tell us something about those monstrously
amazing Diesels-of-Death. Surely, from their "mountains" of "eyewitness
testimony" they can tell us whether the Diesels were outside in the open,
or inside the vehicles (tank or truck or whatever), or inside a room.
Surely, they can tell us whether they were V-12 or inline-sixes or
whatever -- whether they were connected to something like a huge fan or
bonecrusher or something. These Diesels were, supposedly, the greatest
mass murder devices in the entire history of the world -- and we don't even
have a picture.
If Mr. Berg feels it acceptable to ask me how many cylinders a Nazi
engine had, I don't think it's out of line for me to ask him (and Greg
Raven, and Bradley Smith, and Ernst Zündel, and whoever else wants
to try answering):
Give me one piece of documentation, or one testimony, that serves as
evidence for this alleged massive hoax, this insane conspiracy theory.
Just one.
|
