9/11

New Indicting Evidence of The 9/11 Coverup

By Craig T. Furlong
[email protected]
July 26, 2006 The following information was e-mailed tonight, July 25, 2006, to Drs. Fetzer and Jones with Scholars for 9/11 Truth.

Hello, Drs. Fetzer and Jones,
Thank you for all your efforts and hard work in getting at the real truth about 9/11. I discovered information last night I think you should see. It is about the discrepancy in the precise times of the airplane impacts into the Towers:

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University vs the 9/11 Commission Report.
The bottom line is that according to the differences, the seismic readings happened before the planes hit.

I have looked high and low, but cannot find this new information anywhere on the internet.

WTC7 must be the focal point to exposing the government's coverup...HOWEVER, I'd like to take a sharp turn if I may and give you something else to think about: The official 9/11 Commission Report states the following: http://www.9-11commission.gov/ Impact time, AA Flight 11: 8:46:40 a.m. Impact time, UA Flight 175: 9:03:11 a.m. .......HOWEVER, http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html The official data readings from Lamont-Doherty give the following seismic events: Time 8:46:26: 0.9 Richter, signal duration 12 seconds [reported as first impact, WTC1] Time 9:02:54: 0.7 Richter, signal duration 6 seconds [reported as second impact, WTC2]

Conclusion: Two notable seismic events occurred before the planes ever hit the towers and were so close in terms of the time to the actual impacts of the planes that Lamont-Doherty reported them as the impacts. The logical conclusion, which coincides with many eyewitnesses in the basements, including William Rodriquez, is that these were explosives detonated to coincide with the aircraft hitting the towers. They were very close to getting the timing right. This is one time I believe the government; I think their times are correct, down to the second!

And, oh yes, getting back to WTC7, it did have quite a conflagration of fire that day on the south side of the building, and yes, it did have fairly large damage to the south face from debris of WTC1 hitting it...HOWEVER, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that these caused it to collapse IN NEAR-PERFECT SYMMETRY EXACTLY LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION; there is also no evidence to support a claim that support trusses for the floors 5 through 7 were damaged so as to cause the building to collapse.

Putting hypotheticals and conjectures aside, which are not evidence, we do have the fact that WTC7 fell in near-perfect symmetry at free-fall speed, exactly like a classic controlled demolition, and this was for all the world to see.

ONE OTHER THING: if you view the video "Eyewitness 9/11," you will see indisputable evidence by scientific sound analysis of the collapse of WTC1 that shows massive explosions occurred before the tower began to collapse; and, as would be expected, the first notable came from the basement. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=9%2F11+eyewitness

A real investigation is needed NOW, and not like the first disgraceful one that didn't even resemble one.

Editor's note: The 9/11 investigation was intended to cover up 9/11, not learn the truth about it.

Here is what the Commission wrote about its task:
"The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks. The Commission is also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks."
They failed miserably in the "full and complete account" part.
(see David Ray Griffin: "9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions") http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-398081814159578985

I thought it strange that Lamont-Doherty could even pickup seismic data from airplane impacts at the 80th floor. I thought that most of the energy would have been absorbed by the building before it got down to the ground, so how could Lamont-Doherty pick up a seismic reading? That's when I noticed the time of impacts were precise and wondered what the official government times are for the impacts?...and are they precise also?...and, what if they're different?"

The Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University has its data precise to plus or minus one second, and just now I found that the 9/11 Commission based their times on FAA radar data and air traffic control software logic. (see note 130 in this link):<http://www.insightful.com/infact/911/corpus/report_470_460.html> This is a huge discrepancy that leads directly to government coverup.

Craig T. Furlong
Huntington Beach, California