This apparatus was the subject of numerous examinations
by scientists and practical engineers, who in their reports,
almost without exception, had to admit an energy surplus or
energy multiplication without being able to explain the
process by present knowledge.
The inventor also could not give an explanation due to lack
of sufticient knowledge of the activities in the apparatus.
(See reports by Professors Kloss and Schumann on
record at the OKM).
Due to unplesant differences with the financiers, mostly foreigners, and a nervous breakdown of Coler because of these, the apparatus and original theories were lost.
Upon resumption of the experiments at a later date the effect
was occasionally successfully reproduced, (see report by
Dr. Modersohn cocerning events at New Year 1936-7) which,
however, evidentially due to disturbance of the adjustments,
could not be maintained because sufficient measurements were
not taken.
The outbreak of war then put a temporary end to the exprimental work.
Their aim was to produce a working apparatus, which could be shown to the Fuhrer of Germany, leaving the measurement of all activities of the apparatus to a later date.
The OKM approved the aplication and sent sufficient
materials to build the apparatus and lent the inventor
ordinary ampere-meters, voltmeters, and necessary tools.
It was found, however that due to the overload of work upon
them at this time, their spare time work was not sufficient
to secure quick results.
The OKM therefore procured their release from other work,
to allow a more intensive, and, due to the cooperation of Dr.
Frohlich, who had experience in physical measurements.,
a more scientific approach.
The newly developed apparatus could not be made to work, however, because of the lack of thorough knowledge of the activities in the apparatus which now appeared to be very
complicated. Valuable knowledge and promising signs, however, were obtained.
The principle circuits (called the anchor) in which the energy
gain probably occurs, consists of metal plates between which
transformer coils are connected, the whole being connected to
one large plate coil (Plattenspule).
On each of the single windings on this is coupled a large flat
coil (Flachspule) (called field).
These flat coils are interwound in two groups,
these groups represent the turns of a transformer.
This couples, on one hand on the flat coils of the other
group (as secondary coils), and on the other hand on the
anchor-plate coil, which is placed between them.
The third electrically independent circuit (called the
directing circuit) (Steuerkreis) regulates this transference.
Figure 1 shows diagramatically and in plan these interwound
parts (anchor in red, field in green, directing circuit in blue).
Figure 2 the so called basic diagram, shows the connections
between these different parts. This basic diagram shows the
conditions necesary for self-interuption.
In consequence of this arrangement, different types of current
are created in different conductors (pulsed direct current,
alternating current, etc.)
The transformer coils, connected between the anchor plates, are connected in a peculiar way through thin permanent magnet rods. Their main object seems to be to pre-magnetize the transformer cores, it is, however, very probable that they are also connected with the Barckhausen effect, which will be mentioned later.
As these hypotheses had not been examined by measurements, it seemed suitable, for further development of the apparatus, to clarify these questions by further expriment, so far as was possible with the means at our disposal.
The expriments carried out are described below.
(a) The coils must have different apparent resistances (scheinwiderstand). By measurements of voltage and current the apparent resistance of ten right-handed and ten left-handed coils tested with a Philips-Schwebungs-Summer. The apparent resistances were the same within an experimental error of about � 1%.
(b) Other conditions being the same the coils must
induce different potentials across a secndary coil,
when connected to a battery.
Measurements were made with a cathode ray
oscillograph from Siemens and Halske. The induced
potentials were the same. It can therefore be taken
as proved that no such effect exists.
Unfortunately the testing of these effects could only be made with tuned frequency (Tonfrequent) alternating current, with the use of which no such phenomenon could be seen when using measuring instruments and a cathode ray oscillograph.
The question is open whether, and if so in what way, an influence on the electron movement exists through the oscillation of the magnet molecules by high frequency alternating fields, especially of such an impulse-like character.
similarly in opposition, and would, due to the equal
dimensions of the coils eliminate one another.
The measurements referred to above are said to have
given the result that in such a secondary circuit a
considerable direct current component exists which
can be strengthened by means which we shall not go
into here. And this strengthening to a degree such
that the "secondary direct current" is comparable
to the primary current.
Testing the results of these measurements, however, did not confirm them.
It must first be stated that the frequency of the
"Summer" at our disposal (0-12Kc) was not sufficient
to measure the mutual electromagnetic influence of
the plates, due to the low apparent resistance.
This examination should be carried out with high
frequency alternating current. It was, however,
possible by the use of a highly sensitive
oscillograph as a valve voltmeter to measure the
potential induced by the flat coils on the
individual plates, to discover the induction
currents in the plates, and also to determine
the value of the potential induced by the flat
coi1s on the plates in proportion to the currents
created in the plates from the current induced
in the anchor coils (the directing current was
used as a primary winding in these measurements,
being connected to the Schwebungs-Summer).
It appeared that the "Ankertrakte" AC or BD
(See Fig.1) are not all to be
considered as oscillating circuits, but that the
single group systems, consisting of plate - to
anchor coils - plate, already represent independent
oscillation circuits. According to this the apparatus
contained ten such oscillation circuits.
The individual frequency of these circuits and
possible differences existing between them could
unfortunately not be measured, because, as already
mentioned, up to now only tuned frequency for
excitation was at our disposal.
In order to make the apparatus work the harmony of
all oscillating circuits in their individual
frequencies would evidently be
necessary - at least within certain limits
determined by the suppression in question.
Such an adjustment can of course not be
secured by the means at our disposal at
the present.
The previous occasional success must be
considered as due to chance.
The mutual influence of the flat coils upon one another could on the other hand easily be examined because, despite the great distance between the windings (25 mm), they have remarkably great apparent resistance (about 200 ohms at 10 Kc).
It appeared that the power factor (Ubertragungs-faktor) of both of the flat coils wound 1 : 1, in consequence of their peculiar interwinding (See Fig. 1) have the astonishingly high value of 0.85. The value of the power factor was at a maximum at 10 Kc, at which frequency the most favourable matching of the impedance of the Summer was obtained.
The assumption could easily be made that the power factor of the flat coi1s upon the plates is still more favourable, but this measurement can only be made with high frequency alternating current.
Apart from the great number of alternative arrangements and connections between the different parts, - during the period covered by this report eight different circuit diagrams were tested in addition to the experiments above - the following so far unsolved problems are hindering success in making the apparatus work:
Due to the connecting of the batteries, a current
impulse is induced in the anchor circuit which
charges the plates. The discharge current from the
plates causes electrical interruption of short
duration of the battery current in the field circuit,
which furthermore inductively interrupts, or
changes the direction of, the battery current in
the directing circuit for a short time.
The electromagnetic field induced by this process in
the directing circuit by its dissipation, induces
over the field circuit a current in the anchor
circuit recharging the plates, and so forth.
Due to the influence of the Barckhausen effect each single process has an impulse-like character, and. the necessary change of phase is produced to allow the regularity of the process.
Due to a source, up to the present not investigated, and not explainable by existiting scientific theories, an additional quantity of energy is freed during each cycle which leads to a continual raising of the amplitude of the mutual processes, until the magnetic cores are saturated.
From the fact that, in the resistance of the apparatus pulsed direct current is flowing (see Report by Professors Kloss and Schumann) there is possibily an up to now unknown rectifying effect, or alternatively the gain in energy is produced only during one half of the cycle, either during the charging or discharging of the plates. The activity in the apparatus must take place in the ten oscillation circuits in a phase-like manner. As mentioned above no technical means were available to make the necessary tuning adjustments.
It is clear from the above that the success of the inventor up to now could only be to chance, or happy accident. The necessity, therefore, arises to transfer the apparatus from the state of empirical development, with sufficient technical means and based on results of an exact basic research, to a state of working procedure which can be controlled.
It will then be possible for the first time to go from external excitation to self interruption and a solely electro-magnetic basis, whith the aim of bringing the apparatus in question to work systematically.
Berlin, 27 September 1943
(Coler) (Dr. Frohlich)
Extract from Statement by Coler relating to
Frohlich experiments
On the secondary side the coil S was conected with
resistance R, a reversible rectifier G, and a highly
sensitive hot-wire ameter, to form a circuit.
The resistance R was large ocmpared with the
apparent resistance of the coil S.
Switch Sch allowed the switching of the rectifier G
to be carried out in such a manner, that in one
case the half-wave of the opening impulse, and in
the other that of the closing impulse, was
transmitted.
In order to prevent any possible objection, that
the iron had any influence on the results, the
whole transformer was cut out during the
expriments and an iron-free flat coil arrangement
used as the inductor during these experiments.
This eliminated all interference and had
excellent transmission properties. The required.
sensitivity was attained in these measurements
by using a thermopile with the most sensitive
milliammeter. After many trials, the
motor-driven driven interrupter of a Bosch
ignition magnet was used as make-and-break.
This gave very uniform and smooth interruption
with a frequency of 100 c/s. The result obtained
with this experimental arrangement, which already
eliminated all the possible causes of later
objections, was the clear proof of a
considerably larger energy during opening (intake),
compared with closing impulses.
The energy was determined by i2 from the measured
current intensity, and as the resistance R is
large compared to the apparent resistance of
the coil, the objection, that the opening impulse
had a frequency spectrum of considerably higher
value than the closing impulse, could not hold good.
In order to counter all other plausible and possible objections the processes were recorded by an oscillographic method. Unfortunately the light strength of the available cathode ray oscillograph tubes (Braun's tubes - it was during war time) did not suffice to produce perfect oscillogramms. Consequently,
for the time being at least, this aid, which would have
completely removed all objections, had to be dispensed
with and a Simens' loop oscillograph was therefore used.
By choosing suitable loops, sources of error were eliminated as
far as possible, or at least kept within very sma11 limits.
The most careful planimetric measurements again gave the same
results as those obtained with the experimental installation
described above, at least in principle, even though the
percentage difference of the quantity of energy in the
opening and closing impulses was slightly less in the measure-
ments of the oscillogram than those obtained from the thermophile.
It still amounted to an average of 10% compared with 50% in
the measurements, so that errors in the planimetric measurements
are not to be assumed.
Also, if this had been merely a scattering of the results,
a difference in favour of the closing impulse must have
occurred at least once.
However the difference was always in favour of the opening
impulse. Any possible errors in the planimetric measurements
controlled and avoided, by carefully cutting out the figures
produced and weighing them on a most sensitive and
accurate balance.
Consequently this observation can also be considered
as a proof of the fact that an energy difference exists.
The circumstance that the percentage of this unequality
appears smaller in the oscillographic measurements than
in the thermal, which at a power frequency of 100 c/s
assuredly yield a sufficiently accurate mean value,
allowing also for the resistance ratios of the rectifier,
can readily be explained by the lag of the oscillograph
used, which is not even capable of recording the
considerable, but extremely short, energy peak of the
opening impulse.
Although, therefore, the inertialess cathode ray tube
was not used in these measurements as a final proof, I can
consider my discovery of the energy difference between the
opening and closing impulse as proved on the basis of
Frohlich's experiments.
As this also proves simultaneously, that my intuitively derived view, based on my most primitive experiments, of these processes has proved correct, the reader will forgive me, if I consider my other two results as correct, until new, and above all better explanations are found for the phenomena described. This all the more, as my development of the "Space energy receiver" was based on this and was successful.