The following remarks by Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr., MD were
delivered September 2, 2000 in Orlando, Florida at the Summit
Conference on Cholesterol and Coronary Risk presented by the
Cleveland Clinic Foundation in cooperation with the Walt Disney
World Company.
These comments are a reflection of epidemiologic survey
information and Dr. Esselstyn's 12-year reversal study of patients
with severe coronary disease. In the longest study of its type, the
author has demonstrated elimination of disease progression in all
compliant patients who maintained a total serum cholesterol less
than 150 mg/dl and an LDL cholesterol less than 80 mg/dl through a
plant-based diet and cholesterol-reducing medications.
PLANT-BASED NUTRITION
Plant-based nutrition provides us with a pathway to escape the
coronary artery disease epidemic. For persons in central Africa, the
Papua Highlanders of New Guinea, the Tarahumara Indians of northern
Mexico, and inhabitants of rural China as described in the Cornell
China Study, coronary disease is essentially non-existent while
hypertension, Western malignancies, obesity, and adult onset
diabetes are rarely encountered.
While I am proud to have been the founder of this conference in
1997, it has become ever more apparent that these conferences are
not the ultimate answer. This stopgap risk factor and drug oriented
device-driven approach is not designed to conquer this epidemic.
This strategy is laden with expense, morbidity, mortality, and
temporary benefits which rapidly erode with time. We must focus on
the toxic food environment for otherwise our children and young
adults will become the next unsuspecting victims.
We have a crises of leadership in our public and private
institutions with an emphasis on prevention. Their advice to the
public of 30% fat in the diet guarantees disease development and
progression. This level advocated by the National Research Council,
the American Heart Association, the National Cholesterol Education
Program, and the National Institutes of Health has been shown
scientifically to worsen the disease. For them to sanctify this diet
as healthy for the American public, is egregiously inaccurate. Like
trying to fit Cinderella's slipper on one of her sister's - it
simply doesn't work. By way of contrast, the American Cancer Society
prefers 20% dietary fat, while the World Health Organization
advocates 15%.
In 1987 Dr. Scott Grundy proclaimed that with a blood pressure of
110/70 and a total cholesterol of under 150 mg/dl, 90% of heart
attacks could be avoided. Sadly, no public or private institution
detailed for the public the plant-based diet that could achieve
those goals.
The United States Department of Agriculture has a sorrowful
record of caving to the special interests of industry as does the
U.S. Congress. The U.S. Dietary Guidelines committee has over half
its members with ties to industry, while the chairman of the health
and human services department wears a milk mustache. For those
institutions to decide America's nutritive needs is surely putting
the fox in the hen house.
A slogan has arisen from these groups stating there are no
strictly good foods or bad foods. This is sheer nonsense. Coronary
disease has no building blocks from the plant-based diet. Meat,
cheese, milk, butter, ice cream, eggs, fried foods, oils, and
margarine are the lethal atherosclerotic lynchpins. Vogel
demonstrated endothelial damage in young persons within hours of
eating such foods. English children under 10 years of age have been
found by ultrasound to be losing arterial elasticity and
distensibility The Bogalusa, PDAY, Korean, and Vietnam data reveal
coronary artery disease is ubiquitous in our young.
We require a new yardstick to measure cardiovascular excellence
in our institutions. No longer will the number or quality of
interventions and their temporary benefits suffice. There is ample
evidence-based research to support efforts geared to prevention. We
must ask how many patients have achieved successful arrest and
reversal and avoided new coronary and cardiovascular events through
preventive lifestyle changes? Some will argue that their patients
might not follow a plant-based diet. This, I increasingly find, is a
totally negative and self-serving speculation. Our experience is
that patients rejoice that they are now empowered to abolish their
disease progression and are often furious that they were not made
aware of this option earlier. They clearly recognize that the locus
of control for this disease is vested with them. While this
conference will continue updating us with mechanisms of disease,
that information alone will never shut down atherosclerotic
development.
The truth be known, we don't need new information to end this
epidemic. The evidence is in! As practicing physicians, dietitians,
nutritionists, nurses, and researchers, you are an essential part of
the vanguard to disseminate the facts to patients, the public, and
the government.
As leaders, we must have the courage and a renewed moral compass
to provide the public with accurate information to abolish and
prevent atherosclerosis. We must seek leaders and institutions that
are not frayed or compromised by ties to industry or politics to
deliver this message. It must be science and not the messenger which
dictates public policy. |