©Copyright 1998 by Dr.
med. Maria M. Bleker
Abbreviated form of speech given in Heidelberg on 4/26/96
"But in the sciences as well, that which one has learned and has had passed on at the academies is at the same time regarded as one's personal property. Now, if someone comes along with a new idea which contradicts the creed -worshipped for years and passed on to others in turn to worship - threatening even perhaps to overthrow it, then all rise up passionately to suppress it by any and all possible means. One resists it any way one can: pretending not to have heard it, or deprecating it, as if it weren't even worth the effort of inspecting and investigating it. And thus can a new truth have a long wait until it is finally granted recognition." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"Unlike the manifold occasional ailments of mankind which can be ascribed to specific pathogens - Micrococcus catarrhalis, Bacillus influenzæ, Treponema syphiliticum, Pneumococcus, etc. - man harbors two microparasites which are, in effect, his constant companions. Moreover, these two parasites have a certain relationship to - and mutually complement - each other.
The first is the tubercle bacillus, which exhibits a series of developmental stages, of which some are the source of the disease tuberculosis. In its primitive stages (Protit and Chondrit) it is passed on to the next generation in the embryo there is an even more dangerous human parasite which has an indissoluble biological/functional relationship with Koch's bacillus, which I have called the Endobiont. Millions of years ago, the entire class Mammalia was infected by a fungus - Mucor racemosus Fresen
The Endobiont is thus omnipresent in animal bodies and cannot - and in all likelihood should not - be removed; but the conditions attending its development influence all focal infestations and thereby every form of clinical disease. This fungal parasite traverses, in the body, all stages of its entire developmental cycle, which can (to greater or lesser degree) infest all tissues and organs.
A. Leschke has shown that even sperm and egg cells are infested, unlike tuberculosis, for which an infection must take place."
Thus spake Professor Enderlein! The preceding citations present the essential core of his discoveries and teachings. His findings are based on more than 60 years of rigorous scientific research. A short historical retrospective is necessary in order to understand these statements better.
In science it takes, not 30, but 60 years before a new, revolutionary insight can take hold. Not only the old professors, but their disciples as well, have to die off first. - Professor Max Planck
In our current medicine, three fundamental errors still hold sway. It is finally time to rid ourselves, once and for all, of these. These fundamental errors have blocked the way to and rendered impossible an understanding of nature and thus the biological relationships which are the cause of disease in general and chronic diseases in particular.
The first and most fateful error originates with Prof. Ferdinand Cohn (botanist in Breslau [now Wroclaw, Poland]), who in 1870 decided to assign all microbes and bacteria to a single growth and reproductive form each (monomorphism). In Bakterien-Cyclogenie [Bacteria Cyclogeny], Enderlein demonstrates the reality of Polymorphism (i.e. various microbial growth and reproductive forms) in a strict scientific manner. Monomorphism is a biological impossibility. Nature never creates unchanging organisms!
All microbes, including the ones which reside permanently in our bodies, are subject to the same rhythmic developmental course: colloid microbe (primitive phase) bacteria (medial phase) - fungus (terminal phase = Culminante) - which, of course by no means implies that all microbes have to develop all the way up to the fungal phase. It all depends on the culture medium and the valence (information) of the nucleus.
Concerning nutrient media, the various phases need, for their continued development:
Primitive phase: a strongly alkaline pH value
Bacterial phase: a slightly alkaline pH value
Fungal phase: an acidic pH value
To this end, each microbe produces a species-specific purely organic acid from its very first phase on. Thus, Aspergillus niger van Tieghem produces citric acid, Mucor racemosus Fresen produces lactic acid.
The pathogenicity of a microbial organism inheres only in a single developmental phase, very rarely in two or more (e.g. the diphtheria bacillus). The only exceptions are our "permanent tenants", in which nearly all developmental phases are more or less pathogenic. The only exceptions to this are in the first primitive phases - the Protit and the low-valence Chondrits - which are completely non-virulent and play a regulatory role vis-à-vis the higher pathogenic stages by breaking down their copulatory processes. In this sense, these stages are designated as regulators.
These phases can be shown to exist in human and animal blood, but only by means of a "vital blood examination in the darkfield" (background is dark), since the first delicate developmental forms are totally swamped by the flood in light in a conventional "brightfield" (background is light) microscope, and thus rendered invisible.
The second error comes from Prof. William Harvey (London pathologist and physiologist), who - in 1651!!! - designated the cell as the smallest functional biological unit. With Das Ende der Herrschaft der Zelle als letzte biologische Einheit [The End of the Cell's Reign as the Ultimate Biological Unit], published in the Botanische Zentralblatt [Central Botanical Journal] in 1921, in Bakterien-Cyclogenie [Bacteria Cyclogeny] in 1925 and in Archiv für Entwicklungsgeschichte der Bakterien [Archive for Bacterial Phylogenesis] in 1931, Enderlein substantiated the second error. The cell is not the smallest biological unit: the Protit is.
The name Protit was chosen as an allusion to proton, at that time the smallest discernible subatomic particle.
The cell is the
result of the formation into societies
of lower or more primitive forms of life.
The third error was made by Prof. Louis Pasteur (Paris chemist and biologist), who in 1873 was able to make a convincing case for the sterility of blood. Our blood is not sterile; instead it is the "playground" of all manner of pathogenic and apathogenic microorganisms. In fact it is known to be the best culture medium of all!!
As living beings, microbes are subject to the same "urges" or "drives" as all the others, i.e. (loosely adapting from Freud): a) the drive to self-preservation, b) the sexual or reproductive drive, c) the drive for power.
a) The drive for self-preservation is noteworthy for its "bulimia" [excessive appetite] - whereby it should be stressed here that our "Endobiont" (= Mucor racemosus Fresen) is a pronounced protein-feeder. The logical consequence is: microbes also have their own "mini-metabolism" which produces, for each microbe, a specific organic acid. Our "permanent tenants" produce, as has been mentioned above, the following acids:
The Endobiont (Mucor racemosus Fresen) - lactic acid
The tubercle bacillus (Aspergillus niger) - citric acid
b) The sexual or reproductive drive manifests itself as a strong "urge to get close" (for the purpose of copulation) - which inheres in all developmental forms, from the first stages on, even when they are located inside of blood cells. This thus gives rise to more or less large and solid "heaps" (called Symplasts) which, by their very nature, can clog our blood vessels, with predictable consequences for the oxygen supply.
Accordingly, it emits "Symplasts": colloids or Symprotits, thrombocytes, erythrocytes, Leukocytes - or a mixture of all of these.
c) The drive for power expresses itself as the urge to become "anchored" in order to attain to a higher and more stable form. By "anchoring" (= Systatogenie), all developmental phases - even of different provenance - can be found together, since this is not a case of sexual union. This is strictly species-specific.
I would like to point out here that according to Professor Wislicenus (German chemist and developer of stereochemistry) the possible number of different colloids is on the order of 18 trillion, and that these can combine with each other as well as with all chemical substances, including heavy metals, in our own bodies.
This "anchoring" hinders all "participants" in their further upward development. On the other hand, these structures (wonderfully impressive when stained and often falsely identified as "fungi") present a great obstacle to the circulation of blood.
Of all our bodily tissues in which these formations and reformations of our "constant companion" take place, they are the easiest to observe in the blood. Knowing the current developmental phase, we can - always keeping the disease picture and clinical findings in mind - draw useful conclusions. It would be foolish to continue to ignore these facts any longer. "One cannot fight an unknown enemy." (Enderlein)
"Gentlemen, I would like to ask that you recognize the fact that even the most successful surgical intervention represents nothing less than the proof that we were not able to heal this or that disease." (from his lectures) - Professor Bier, MD & Privy Councilor (18611949)
"A few men think, but all will have opinions." - George Berkely (16841753)
According to Professor Enderlein:
The Paracoli bacterium is not a "degenerate Coli bacterium", but rather the Phytit stage of the Endobiont.
The causal basis of the infectivity of filtrates of tubercular material is the Chondrit stage of the tubercle bacillus; this was established as far back as 1910 by Fontes in Brazil (cf. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, I, 2, 1910, p. 186).
H. Dostal further demonstrated the ease of transportability of the tubercle bacillus in the spherical form (Basit stage) with cultures in liquid media (cf. Viennese Medical Weekly [Wien. Med. Wochenschr.], Vol. 60 1910, pp. 20982100 & Vol. 63 1913)
Fibrin is by no means the precipitate of a "protein coagulation", but rather the Chondrit Dendroid of the Endobiont.
Thrombocytes are not blood organelles (platelets); they are Thecits of the Endobiont.
Megakaryocytes (Metschnikow) are not "normal" cell elements; instead, the affected cells and their nuclei have lost the ability to divide, due to massive infestation by the primitive phases of the Endobiont.
The polynuclear cell is related to the preceding, except that the nucleus still has the ability to divide which the cell itself has lost.
The megaloblasts of pernicious anemia are not "nucleated erythrocytes", but rather erythrocytes which contain in themselves a colony of Endobiont Chondrits, which swell it up to an enormous size (pseudo-nucleus!).
Normoblasts are bone-marrow erythrocytes with no nucleus, but only a pseudo-nucleus consisting of colonies of Endobiont Chondrits.
Macrocytes are abnormally enlarged erythrocytes without a "pseudo-nucleus", whose enlargement likewise is due to massive infestation by the Chondrit Stage of the Endobiont.
Peripheral granules of the erythrocytes are not organelles (Schilling), but Symprotits of the Endobiont.
Peripheral rods of the erythrocytes are not organelles (Schilling), but bacterial rods of the bacterial phase of the Endobiont which have developed further from the above-mentioned peripheral granules.
Also, the round- and spindle-cell sarcomas contain no host round or spindle cells; instead, these represent diagonal sections of (round) cells and slanted longitudinal sections of (spindle) cells of the Endobiont.
Reticulocytes (Heilmeyer) are not "erythrocytes with special organelles", but rather erythrocytes whose innards have been infested with Endobiont Chondrit Trees.
Pseudopod formations of leukocytes and dendrites (after BOND, London 1924: "The Leukocyte in Health and Disease", H. K. Lewis & Co.) are actually Endobiont Chondrit dendroids.
Sterility of the blood (both in centrifugate and in filtrate) - This medical mirage represents, in actuality, a mass infestation of all blood elements of all vertebrates including man - even the healthiest of men - with Endobiont primitive phases.
The Culminante of the fungal form (Mucor racemosus fresen) of the Endobiont is easy to extract by culturing from tumors, as demonstrated by Dr. Otto Schmidt of Munich as early as 1903 and subsequently as well
Cancer Cell // Body Cell
from Prof. Hans Dechow
The cancer cell and the body cell have only one thing in common: they are both nucleated cells. That's it. What follows is intended to delineate the fundamental differences between body cells and cancer cells.
The body cell uses respiration
the cancer cell uses fermentation.
Body cells (except blood cells) can only live and grow in groups
cancer cells grow and multiply singly as well.
Body cells can only grow on their characteristic plasma
cancer cells can grow on any halfway suitable culture medium.
Transplanted body cells, even embryonic cells, quickly perish
transplanted cancer cells continue to grow.
Body cells are very limited in their mobility
cancer cells are very actively mobile.
A body cell will never ingest another cell
the cancer cell, on the other hand, is an out-and-out predatory beast!
Cancer cells decay more easily than body cells.
Body cells exhibit regulated mitosis subject to rules and conditions
tumor cells frequently exhibit very irregular mitosis with severe chromosomal damage.
