Portal logo
FIRE IN THE EARTH
We already have discussed some of the subterfuges used in stealing diamonds—placing them in the lead of a bullet, in the square recesses of the middle pages of books, even in the human body. We know, too, about the Alsatian dogs who bring down their men. And, of course, the most ef­fective of all, the company compound.
The compound was the idea of Cecil Rhodes and other leaders of the diamond industry. It was conceived with the purpose of preventing natives from getting in contact with "I.D.B's." From the time it was instituted the diamond companies found their yields greatly increased. The natives, it seems, willingly contracted to be confined in these com­pounds like prisoners for a certain stated time. But even though they were hardly more than peons, it is only fair to point out that the diamond-mine owners laid down a law that wages were to be paid in cash in full, and not partly in goods, although from all the reports one gathers the miners were required to buy from company-owned stores. But whereas most of our company-owned stores in the United States have overcharged for their goods, the mine stores charged the natives so little that the near-by townspeople protested, claiming that when the labor contracts of the natives in the compound expired, these natives were in­clined to accuse the traders in town of overcharging, having become accustomed to the lower prices.
Now in a book like this it is hardly up to me to go into the economic aspects of Kaffir labor in diamond mines thousands of miles away—we have enough such problems at home. But to complete the picture, it would seem that the final decision was to charge the Kaffir boys the same as the townspeople charged for goods. As to labor conditions, a De Beers historian puts it this way:
(44)