Portal logo
THE HOUSE IN CHARTERHOUSE STREET
no diamond ever has been found that was flawless or it would have been polished and faceted, not cut.
About 1897, the year of the Diamond Jubilee (sixty years' reign of Queen Victoria, although some ask why it shouldn't be seventy-five, and there is a difference of opinion), the diamond was cut. It was shown at the Paris Exhibition of 1900. Other than that it has no history, not even the strange story of discovery such as marked the Jonker. It simply was discovered in the ordinary course of working-day events. It was in the possession of the London firm, Wernher, Beit & Co. in 1930, but left England in 1939 to be sold to an un­named East Indian Prince (Indian Princes seeming to pop up all the time to claim these things, as though they re­sented the fact that diamonds had been found outside of legendary Golconda).
Finally, we have the Baumgold diamond, so named be­cause the New York cutters of that name couldn't think of any other at the time they had to record its purchase upon their ledger books. By that time it had been cut up into many small stones. We discuss it briefly here because it is a symbol, or example, of the obscurity that lies in wait for great stones whose owners are indifferent to their largeness, their exploitation value. If it hadn't been for Tavernier, half the famous stones of India would have remained in ob­scurity. If it hadn't been for a number of merchants and cutters and dealers in America, a great many more diamonds would not have been proclaimed in the press as "famous."
The Baumgold diamond weighed in the rough 609 carats. It was found in the Premier mine of South Africa under no dramatic circumstances—it simply was mined in the course of a day's work. It was cut up into twenty-five stones, two of which were 50 carats each. The others ranged from half a carat to 15 carats in size.
(75)