Properties of Gemstones: There are two sets of characteristics possessed by every gemstone, and by which they are studied, identified and evaluated:

1) physical properties, and 2) optical properties.

In this lesson we'll be concerned with physical properties: those which do not depend on the gem's interaction with light to be expressed or measured. (In the next lesson we'll look at the optical properties).

All properties of gems (whether physical or optical) derive from the underlying three dimensional structure and chemical composition of the gem. Or to put it another way, the chemical elements that make up the gem, and how the atoms of those elements are put together to create its inner structure, determine all those properties that we can see, feel, and measure.

Amorphous vs Crystalline: The most basic discrimination that can be made, based on internal structure, is that between gems which are amorphous, and those which are crystalline.

Crystalline gems have a specific chemical formula, and a well defined, highly predictable internal structure, known as a crystal lattice. Amorphous gem species also have a specific chemical formula, but their constituent atoms are not arranged in such regular and predictable patterns as those of crystalline materials.

Amorphous Gems

"Amorphous" literally means "without form", but, of course, these materials have a form--> it's just not highly regular and predictable, nor is it expressed outwardly by the formation of crystals. Some examples of amorphous gems are: the natural glasses, amber, jet, opal, and "metamict" minerals.

Natural Glasses: The atoms making up a glass (either natural or man-made) have been cooled from the molten state so quickly that they fail to assume a regular crystalline pattern. A volcanic glass, like obsidian, then, might be formed if a volcano released lava into the air or water such that it was very rapidly cooled--> this very same lava could, upon slower cooling, form a crystalline material (like basalt, for example).

Obsidian ranges in color from light yellow through brown to black and can be transparent, translucent, or opaque. Those of our ancestors, who lived in areas of volcanic activity, made ready use of these natural glasses.

[Obsidian artifacts]

In some cases, due to the presence of other minerals with different crystallization temperatures, when the molten material cools, crystal inclusions may be formed. These can give the obsidian an interesting pattern, or affect the structure in such as way as to cause an optical phenomenon, like iridescence. Although most obsidian is drab, single-color translucent material, two interesting and more showy forms of this volcanic glass can be seen below:

["Snowflake" obsidian, "velvet" obsidian]

Tektites: Another group of natural glasses, known collectively as "tektites", are not found associated with volcanic eruptions, but rather in places which are believed to have been sites of meteoric impact. The heat and compression of the impacts are thought to have melted silica sand, and the molten bits which were flung into the air rapidly cooled into their glassy state.

[Tektite from China]

Although, like most obsidian, the various types of tektites are dull colors of green and brown, they are still much sought after by gem and mineral collectors. They have a following as well among those who ascribe mystical properties to these gems, perhaps because of their association with celestial events.

The most commonly seen tektite is a green, near transparent type found in the Moldau River Valley in Eastern Europe, known as Moldavite. An intriguing light yellow form of natural glass has been found in several areas within the Libyan Desert, and, to date, has not been associated with a meteor impact, so its origin remains uncertain.

Amorphous Organics: A number of organic gem materials have an amorphous structure. Species like amber and jet which are composed of organic molecules, (those of evergreen tree resin, and the wood of certain hardwood trees, respectively) which have been altered into a near "plastic" polymeric state by geologic forces and time, are examples.

[Reverse-carved amber cabochon, jet carving]

Opal: Although opal is one of the most diverse gem species, with a large number of named varieties, all share a common structural feature. An electron-microscopic view of opal shows that it is made of row upon row of stacked silica spheres, the exact arrangement, pattern, and size of which determine the body color, transparency and degree of color play of the opal.

Opal forms as a colloidial solution of tiny silica particles in water, and as the water is lost the material solidifies to a microscopically porous, amorphous state.

[Opals from Australia and Ethiopia]

Metamict Minerals: Most zircon specimens that you will see, are crystalline gems, but a few pieces (generally a dull olive green color) have lost some, or all, of their crystalline structure, and have become disorganized internally to a glassy state. This transformation is due to the effects of radiation, and such a material is said to be "metamict".

The radiation source is usually from impurities within the zircon itself, but can be from surrounding rocks. This phenomenon can occur naturally in several minerals, but zircon, and perhaps ekanite, are the only ones of gem significance. These glass-like zircons (sometimes called "low" zircons) do not have the same super-bright luster and brilliance of the crystalline type, and are mainly sought as curiosities by collectors.

[Metamict zircon]

**Check the Text: If you look in the back of the Cally Hall book, you'll find a "Table of Properties" section that lists the structure of many gem materials. See if you can find a well known gem, not mentioned in this web lecture, that is amorphous.

Crystalline Gems

The highly regular, and sometimes startlingly angular shape of some well formed crystals can seem eerily out of place in the world of Nature, with its more familiar curving and flowing lines. It's no wonder, then, that a rich history of mystical and mythological lore pre-dates, and coexists with, today's chemical and physical understanding of crystal structure.

Imagine the reaction of our ancestors, so used to the shapes and forms of flowing water, curling fire, gnarled tree branches, curving shell, roseate flowers and sinuous leaves, when they saw something that looks like the images below, perhaps in a mass of rock on a hillside, or upon cracking open an ordinary looking boulder:

[Natural pyrite cubic crystal in host rock, amethyst crystals inside a geode: Image courtesy of: Treasure Mountain Mining]

The internal regularity that the outer features of such structures implies, was as evident to our ancestors as it is to us, but it was not until the beginnings of modern physics and chemistry (in the 17th - 18th centuries) that some of the underlying causes came to be understood. Full revelation of the most intimate details of crystal formation and properties awaits future generations, but major gains were made in the early 1950's with the advent of a technique called Xray diffraction.

Although definitely more"hi-tech", the principle behind this technique is essentially the same as used in an ordinary medical Xray machine. To illustrate: a beam of Xrays travels through your arm, let's say, to Xray sensitive film below. The dense tissue (bone) absorbs more of the Xrays than does the soft tissue, so the film is exposed differently, and a high contrast picture is made.

In the case of mineral crystals, the dense areas (where atoms are closer together) absorb more Xrays than the less dense ones (where atoms are further apart), and a high contrast picture is produced. For those who have been trained in reading such photos, inner details of crystal structure can be deduced by interpreting the patterns.

**Check the text: See page 37 of the Lyman text for such a photo.

Single Crystal vs Aggregate Gems: Within the realm of crystalline gem materials, the major distinction to be made is that between those which are composed of macroscopically visible, single crystal units, and those which occur as a mass of interlocking or intermeshed microscopic or submicroscopic crystals.

The pyrite and amethysts, pictured above, are examples of single crystal gems. If, however, you can imagine shrinking the amethyst quartz crystals down to very, very tiny proportions and pushing them together in random orientations such that you'd need ultra-strong magnification to resolve them, you'd have an idea of the internal organization of an aggregate gem, like chalcedony (an aggregate form of quartz).

Both amethyst and chalcedony are the same species: namely quartz, so their crystals (whatever their size) are of the trigonal system, and their chemical formula is SiO₂, but the difference in the crystal sizes and arrangement creates some notably different physical and optical properties in the two varieties. For example, amethyst, and other single crystal quartzes, are commonly transparent and one color, while chalcedonies, agates, and other aggregate quartzes are translucent to opaque and often have complex color patterns. Although single crystal and aggregate types of quartz are equally hard, the aggregates are notably tougher. Recall this pair of photos from Lesson 2 which also serve as good examples here:

[Single crystal (amethyst) and aggregate (agate) forms of quartz]

Single Crystal Gems

Single crystals can be large--> truck size or even bigger. I recall with pleasure an undergraduate college geology field trip made to Crystal Cave in Put-in-Bay, South Bass Island, Ohio. The cave, which was actually an enormous underground geode, had walls and a ceiling composed of huge celestite (or celestine) crystals.

Check the web: This website has pictures from inside Crystal Cave: http://www.putinbayphotos.com/crystalcave/crystalcave.htm

[Celestite crystal cluster from Ohio,near Crystal Cave: Image courtesy of www.irocks.com]

**Check the Hall text, pg. 105, if you'd like to learn more about celestite.

Single crystal gems grow in clusters or individually, and they can be formed within, or attached to, another mineral, or loose, as so-called "floater" crystals. Single crystals can be quite small, but they will still qualify as single crystals (not aggregates), as long as they are large enough to be visible as separate entities without high magnification. "Drusy" gems consist of such small, to tiny, single crystals, which have grown upon a matrix.

[Single Hanksite crystal]

[Quartz "floater"crystal cluster, spinel crystal in calcite marble matrix]

[Tiny single crystals of uvarovite garnet on a matrix (drusy) with inset showing them at 20x magnification]

Aggregate Gems: Micro- vs Crypto-crystalline

Microcrystalline aggregates: Aggregates with crystals that can be resolved with a light microscope are called microcrystalline. The standard way to view the crystals is with a very thin slice of the gem, and about 100 - 200x magnification. The most commonly known gem material that falls in this category is jade.

[Microcrystalline aggregate gems: jadeite jade, nephrite jade]

Cryptocrystalline aggregates: Aggregate quartz gems such as: agate, chalcedony, and jasper are generally referred to as cryptocrystalline (crypto, meaning "hidden"). This is because the minute crystals cannot be resolved with a standard light microscope, but are revealed only with an electron microscope, or by using specialized polarizing lighting, and very high magnifcation.

[Cryptocrystalline quartzes: agate, jasper, chalcedony]

Gem Rocks

For the sake of completeness, it should be mentioned that although the vast majority of amorphous and crystalline gemstones are composed of a single mineral species (other than their minor inclusions), a few gem materials are classed as rocks. A rock is a variable mixture of two or more minerals. Perhaps the most familiar and valuable of the gem rocks is lapis lazuli, a mixture of the minerals lazurite, sodalite, Hauyne, calcite and pyrite. Other gem rocks include unakite (pink feldspar, green epidote, and quartz) and Chinese writing stone (white feldspar crystals in shist).

[Unakite, lapis lazuli, and Chinese writing stone, popular gem rocks]

*********

Crystallograpy: It is beyond the scope of this introductory course (and beyond your instructor's ability) to delve deeply into the complex and rigorous field of scientific crystallography, however; it will be necessary for us to have a passing acquaintance with a few basics. This is because the majority of gems are crystalline, and the specific nature of their crystalline structure has bearing on both their outward form, and their physical and optical properties.

Scientific analysis has determined that there are seven^** basic plans upon which all mineral crystals are built--> they are known as the "crystal systems". Each of the systems has a unique architecture, based on the lengths, and angles of intersection, of planes through the crystal called "axes", about which there are degrees of symmetry. Huh?, I hear you say--> perhaps a diagram would be helpful at this point:

[Crytstal systems figure courtesy of Dr. Brad Amos]

(**You may find in some references, that six, rather than, seven systems, is the number given. The seeming discrepancy occurs because some sources consider hexagonal and trigonal to be different aspects of the same basic plan, and lump them together, but for our purposes in this class, as described in our two texts, we'll use seven. )

Unit Cells

The innermost structure of each crystal is based upon atomic-scale building blocks that exhibit the symmetries shown in the "axes" column in the diagram above. These tiny building blocks are called "unit cells". The shape of a unit cell is different in each of the crystal systems: a cube in the cubic system, a "brick" for the tetragonal system, etc. These tiny structures assemble themselves as the crystal grows, and build the crystal up to its finished size and shape. It might seem, from the diagram above, that there are only a few outward forms (or "habits") possible, given the seven types of unit cells available--> but in the real world, we find that mineral crystals come in nearly an infinite set of shapes and sizes. How can this be?

Because it is easiest to visualize, I'll use the cubic (also known as isometric) system to illustrate. The unit cell in this system is a cube: picture a baby's building block set, or (if you live here in Nevada), dice.

Is it possible to build a big cube out of little cubes?... Sure, just stack them up 5 x 5 x 5 or in any other equal dimenisons, and your many little cubes become one big one. Such is the mechanism by which the impressive pyrite cube seen earlier in the lesson was built from the little, cube shaped, unit cells of the mineral pyrite. It shouldn't surprise you, then, to learn that diamond (which is also a member of the cubic crystal system) is sometimes found in natural cubes.

[Natural diamond crystals, showing the "cube" crystal habit, natural cubic diamond crystals drilled as beads for earrings]

But using those same blocks or dice, can you build a pyramid?... You bet! Start with a square base, and decrease each square layer uniformly until to get to the top single cube. (5 x 5, then 4 x 4, then 3 x 3, etc). Look at the second of the "typical forms" for the cubic system shown in the diagram above. Can you see it as two pyramids attached to each other, base to base? That shape is called an octahedron (meaning eight sides) and it's a common form seen in the crystals of gems of the cubic system. (Why are the faces of the octahedra so smooth?--> because the cubic unit cells are really, really tiny, and there are enormous numbers of them!

[Fluorite and spinel octahedra--To which crystal system do fluorite and spinel belong?]

Crystal "Habits"

Characteristic crystal forms such as those above, that are easily recognized, and are typical of a particular mineral, are known as its crystal "habits", but no gem species is limited to these ideal shapes. You can also see, I'm sure, that it's quite possible to build a random looking structure out of your blocks or dice, one that has no readily categorizable outer shape. This frequently seen habit in crystalline gems is referred to simply as "massive".

Now, recognizing that each of the seven crystal systems has a different unit cell, and that these unit cells can be put together in many, many ways, is there any wonder that the diversity of crystal forms in Nature is staggering, and such a challenge, and delight to mineral specimen collectors?

A few of the crystal habits, due to their similarity to common objects, are especially recognizable and have acquired special names, as demonstrated by the specimens below:

[Acicular (needle-like): golden rutile crystals in quartz, "puffball-like"mesolite specimen of radiating acicular needles (image courtesy of Treasure Mountain Mining)

[ Prismatic (pencil-like) tourmaline crystals, red beryl crystal in matrix: Image courtesy of www.irocks.com]

[Dendritic (like tree branches): quartz with black manganese dioxide crystal inclusions, sandstone matrix with iron oxide dendritic crystals on surface, dendritic native copper crytals]

[Drusy (like sugar or powdery snow on a surface): rainbow pyrite crystals on matrix, botryoidal (seen in aggregate gems only, like a bunch of grapes or bubbles): blue chalcedony]

Check the web: This site has an extensive list of these, and many other habits, and a spectacular picture of an unusual pyrite crystal habit: http://www.answers.com/topic/crystal-habit

Crystal Growth

Factors affecting crystal appearance: Although the crystal system and unit cell which are characterisitic of a particular gem species set certain parameters in regards to their formation, there are also a mulitude of environmental factors that will determine precisely what size, shape, color, and clarity a particular crystal will have. (We'll be taking a look at how different species of gems are formed in Lesson 10, "Gem Formation", but regardless of the specifics, all gem formation processes are affected by the same factors listed below).

• Temperature/Pressure: the effect of rapid versus slow cooling of a melted material has already been alluded to, but there is more to the story. The same molten mass of atoms, or the same solution, or vapor of materials can crystallize differently, depending on the temperature and pressure at the time, and in the place, where crystallization occurs. This is because there can be more than one stable crystal lattice composed of the same atoms. The various stable configurations that a particular gem species can crystallize in, are referred to as its "polymorphs".

Polymorphs

When two materials have the same chemical formula but have crystallized differently (due to each being subjected to different temperature/pressure conditions at formation), they are called polymorphs. The most famous examples are diamond and graphite. Both have the same chemical formula (just C, pure carbon), but the "lead" in your pencil and the diamond on your finger, obviously exhibit quite different properties. Graphite crystals are formed of sheets of tightly bonded carbons atoms in layers which are very loosely bound to each other, allowing lots of slipping and sliding. Diamond crystals have each carbon atom bonded tightly to four others surrounding it in all directions, so the whole structure is very strong and durable.

[Graphite and diamond (uncut dodecahedral (12 sided) crystal), polymorphs of carbon]

Another interesting gem example is the case of Al₂SiO₅ which can crystallize in the orthorhombic system as Andalusite, or in the triclinic system as kyanite.

[Polymorphs of Al₂SiO₅ : Andalusite, kyanite]

Check the web: For those of you with an interest in pharmacology or medicine, a recent article by Alexandra Goho in Science News reviews some of the "polymorphic" difficulties drug companies run into as they attempt to produce crystalline drugs. The environmental conditions that lead to the production of ineffective or even toxic polymorphic forms of drugs are difficult to identify and control. http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040821/bob9.asp

• Space available: crystals often form in cavities, cracks, bubbles, and other cramped places, the size and shape of which will limit growth possibilities. Some directions of potential growth might be unavailable or limited, while others afford plenty of "growing room". It can also occur that two or more crystals which start growing in a space independently, can contact and/or interpenetrate each other resulting in "twinning".
• Chemical elements present: Each species requires a particular set and proportion of chemical elements for its basic makeup, and cannot grow without them. Non-required elements, though, which incorporate into the growing crystal in trace amounts can have dramatic effects on the appearance (usually color) of the gem. For example, a very small amount of the element chromium, when present along with the necessary aluminum and oxygen, turns, what would otherwise have been colorless corundum, into red ruby. In addition, fluctuations in the amount or type of growth materials present can lead to color zoning, as well as to the creation of crystal "phantoms" and "negative" crystals.
• Other minerals present: Minerals do not usually form crystals in complete isolation. As a particular crystal is forming, other minerals, also in the process of crystallization, can be captured by it (to show up as inclusions) or capture it. Exactly how this plays out will depend on the relative crystallization temperatures and pressures required by the materials in the group.

[Quartz from Madagascar with fluorite crystal inclusions, inset picture at 10x]

Special Growth Phenomena:

Twinning

When growing crystals of the same mineral share one or more faces, the result is a crystal "twin". Depending on the nature of the twinning, which can be on either a visible, or a microscopic scale, the shape of the crystal might be dramatically affected, or the material's properties could be noticeably altered. Sometimes, evidence of twinning can be seen in a crystal or cut gem due to unusual color or inclusion patterns.

[Twinned quartz crystals in "rabbit ear" form: (Image courtesy of Treasure Mountain Mining), twinned octahedral diamond crystals which form a characteristic flattened triangular "maacle", rare "hour glass" twinned gypsum cyrstal from Australia: Image courtesy of www.irocks.com]

 

[Evidence of twinning in quartzes: in the pattern of lepidocrosite platelets of the cabochon, and in the alternating color sectors of the crystal slice.]

Phantoms and Negative Crystals:

Due to changes in environmental conditions, starts and stops of crystal growth occur. When other minerals, which are favored in the new conditions, start to grow, they sometimes crystallize on the "old" faces of the temporarily inert material. When conditions change, and the host once again starts its growth, evidence of the pauses may now be visibly captured as outlines of the temporary stopping points, called "phantoms".

Likewise, certain conditions may completely block the growth of an interior portion of a crystal leaving a void which is bounded by the sides of the crystal around it--> at first glance this "negative" crystal looks like a solid crystal inclusion, but it is indeed empty.

[Edenite phantoms in quartz, hematite phantoms in calcite, a negative crystal in quartz]

Pseudomorphs:

The term "pseudomorph" literally means false form. A pseudomorph is, in a way, the opposite of a polymorph. Whereas polymorphs are different crystal forms of the same chemical compound, a pseudomorph shows a crystal form which is not one recognized for its species. To put it another way, it's the case of one mineral taking on the outward form of another while keeping its chemistry unchanged. Let's take the example of Goethite which is an iron oxide mineral that crystallizes in the orthorhombic system. A glance back at the diagram for the crystal systems shows us that orthorhombic gems do not form in perfect cubes. Pyrite, however is an iron sulfide mineral (in the cubic system) that frequently forms crystals shaped like perfect cubes.

[Pseudomorphs: Goethite ps. after pyrite: Image courtesy of www.irocks.com, copper ps. after aragonite]

In the first picture above you see what appears to be a twinned pyrite crystal, but chemically and physically it tests not as pyrite, but as Goethite, the second picture shows what appears to be a hexagonal crystal, but it is made entirely of the cubic system mineral, copper. Pseudomorphs occur when environmental conditions occur that cause the replacement of one chemical compound with another without altering the pre-existing three dimensional structure. Mineralogically, the item is named as an "X" pseudomorph (ps.) after "Y". (Goethite pseudomorph after pyrite, for example. ) Likewise those "petrified" fossils spoken of in Lesson 1 are more technically known as "chalcedony pseudomorphs after bone", or "opal pseudomorphs after wood".

Check the web: this website has examples of the several different processes involved in the formation of pseudomorphs and some neat pseudomorph pictures: http://www.gc.maricopa.edu/earthsci/imagearchive/pseudomorphs.htm

Chemical Groups of Gems: In addition to categorizing gems by their three dimensional structures, we can also view them as belonging to various chemical groups. Due to their related chemistries, some quite different looking gems share some of their basic properties, while other gems which look rather similar, differ markedly, due to their unlike chemistries.

Even if you haven't yet taken a college chemistry course, you are undoubtedly familiar with the basic idea that the material world around us is made of up of units (atoms) of unique substances called elements. Examples of elements would be carbon and aluminum. These elements are held together in crystal lattices, molecules and amorphous materials, by attractive forces called chemical bonds.

In the world of minerals, certain groupings occur quite commonly. For example, oxygen frequently occurs bonded to atoms of a metal (like iron or aluminum). We call such compounds oxides, and oxide gems have some characteristics in common. There are dozens of chemical groups which could be listed if all gem species were taken into account, but in this course, you will be required to recognize, and recall, only five major groups, the: silicates, oxides, carbonates, phosphates and native elements.

Accounting for nearly 60% of gem species, silicates are the most important group, closely followed in prominence by the oxides. These two groups have in common, that their member species tend to be relatively hard and stable, while the carbonates and phosphates are generally softer, and susceptible to attack by acids.

Recognizing which chemical group a species belongs to is simple, as long as you know what to look for.

• Silicates: Regardless of what other atoms are present (usually one or more metals), gems of this category will have in their chemical formulas some number of Si and O (silicon and oxygen) atoms listed together as a group . For example, as in the polymorphic species from above: Al₂SiO₅--> here we see the group of one silicon atom and five oxygen atoms, which identify the polymorphs Andalusite/kyanite as silicate gems. The numbers of Si and O will vary, depending on the species, but will always appear as a unified group.

  In general they tend to be hard, transparent to translucent, and of medium density. In this very large class are all the beryls (aquamarine, emerald, etc.), all the quartzes (amethyst, rose quartz, agate, etc.), all the feldspars (sunstone, moonstone, etc.), all the garnets (pyrope, Spessartite, demantoid, etc.) topaz, tourmaline, zircon, and many other lesser known species.

  **Check the text--turn to the back pages of the Hall text and look up each of these to practice recognizing the characteristic silicate chemical groupings. Do this for all the other gems shown in the four other groups below!

  Here's the first one for you: looking up emerald on page 152 you see : Be₃Al₂(SiO₃)₆ ......

[Emerald, amethyst, tiger'seye quartz]

[Moonstone, rhodolite garnet, blue topaz]

[Bi-colored tourmaline, white zircon]

• Oxides: This group will have one or more oxygen atoms (not grouped with silicon, phosphorus or carbon) in their formulas. Many oxides are important ores of metals or valuable gemstones and tend to be quite hard and rather dense. Amongst the members of this group are corundum Al₂O₃ (ruby and sapphire), spinel, hematite and chrysoberyl.

[Ruby, spinel]

[Hematite, chrysoberyl]

• Carbonates: The grouping CO₃ identifies the carbonate gems such as rhodocrosite, malachite, calcite (CaCO₃), and azurite. They are generally soft and often brightly colored. They dissolve readily in hydrochloric acid.

[Rhodocrosite, malachite]

[Calcite, azurite]

• Phosphates: A PO₄ group is the identifying chemical landmark for gems of this class. Many of these gems have very complex formulas, but do not be intimidated, you can still see the phosphate group in there! A highly variable group, in general they are soft, fragile, and brightly colored. Turquoise, and apatite are notable phosphate gems.

[Turquoise, apatite]

• Native Elements: This is the easiest group of all to recognize, as it consists of one and only one element. All the precious jewelry metals such as gold, silver and platinum belong to this group, as does diamond.

[Native gold from Nevada, gold in quartz necklace, platinum nugget: Image courtesy of www.irocks.com]

[Diamonds: image courtesy of www.thaigem.com]

Two interesting native element examples, not used as gems, but often sought by collectors are sulfur and mercury. Pure sulfur occurs in bright yellow crystals which would tempt the faceter if they were not so heat sensitive that just holding them in the hand causes them to crack, and rare native mercury has the distinction of being the only metal found in a liquid form at normal ambient temperatures.

[Crystals of pure sulfur from Mexico: beautiful to look at but too fragile to touch, droplets of liquid native mercury in matrix rock from California: Images courtesy of www.irocks.com]

Major Physical Properties

Although there are a dozen or more physical properties which can be measured, in this course we will concentrate on just a few. In particular, our focus will be on those which are either visible directly, or measurable with minimal equipment, and those which are most important as indicators of a gem's identity, and/or its suitability for particular uses:

Cleavage: In the three dimensional structure of certain crystals, atoms are bound more tightly to each other in some directions and more loosely in others. As a consequence, when strong forces are applied, relatively clean breaks may occur in these "weakest link" directions. These breaks, which can sometimes be so smooth as to appear to have been polished, are called cleavages. The number of directions in which a particular material cleaves, the ease with which that happens, and the "perfection" of the breaks are used to quantify this characteristic.

Since cleavage, or lack of it, is a species trait, it also serves as a good gem identification criterion. In the examples below, the number and completeness of cleavage of three species are shown.

Species with easy or perfect cleavage, particularly when such is the case in multiple directions, are poor risks for most jewelry applications. Not all gems show cleavage however, for example tourmalines, sapphires, and garnets do not.

[Apatite: two, imperfect (note that cleaved surfaces are somewhat rounded and irregular); spodumene: two, perfect (note extremely flat, smooth breaks), fluorite: four, perfect]

Food for thought: Far from being a matter limited to academic interest, knowledge of gem cleavage has practical value, both as a means of gem identification, and in the appropriate fashioning and selection of gems for a particular use. (Answers to the questions below are found at the end of the lesson).

Question 1: Suppose you're a budding gem cutter or collector, and you happen to be at a swapmeet where a vendor has some transparent pink gem rough to sell. He knows that it is either Kunzite (pink spodumene) or pink tourmaline, but just can't remember which one. You have been wanting some pink tourmaline, so you look at the material closely and can't find any evidence of cleavages, even using your 10 power magnifier. Of the two choices, which is it most likely to be?

Question 2: A big decision is coming up in your life--> you are about to choose an engagement ring. Not being a slave to tradition, you are considering a colored stone for the piece, rather than a diamond. You want a blue stone, and your top contenders are: blue topaz, and blue sapphire. Considering that engagement rings are worn all day, every day, for many years, you do not want a stone that is likely suffer a cleaveage that will crack or break it. Which is your best choice? (Hint: look up topaz in the Lyman text pg. 128).

Question 3: You've found a beautiful piece of apatite rough and want to have a stone cut from it . You approach your friend who is a facetor, and ask him/her to cut you a marquis shaped stone from the piece. The cutter declines and says they will cut an oval or round but not a marquis. Why?

Miners have long used the cleavage properties of gems in trimming the stones they find. "Cobbing" is the act of smacking a piece of rough sharply and precisely with a hammer to break off any unstable (already partially cleaved), or included areas. Knowledge of the cleavage planes in the material being mined is essential to efficient use of this technique.

The use of cleavage is perhaps most well known in diamond cutting. We've all seen photos or videos of that tense moment when the diamond cutter inserts the wedge at a particular spot on the diamond and strikes it with a mallet. If all goes well, the stone splits precisely where the cutter wanted, and expected, it to. It is said that the expert that first cleaved the (up to that time) largest rough diamond ever found (The Cullinan) had studied it for months to determine its cleavage planes, and upon striking the first blow fainted dead away from anxiety. All was well, however.

**Check the text: See page 7 in the Hall text to view the largest of the many cut stones from the Cullinan, in its home in the Royal Scepter of the British Crown Jewels).

Fracture: Whereas cleavages occur only in some gems, and within those, only in certain directions, fractures can, and do, occur in all gems, and in any direction. A fracture is a break which is not along a cleavage plane. With sufficient force, any gem will fracture, although some do so more readily than others. The edges of fractures are not smooth like those of cleavages, but they do tend to have one of several basic appearances.

Playing on the resemblances of certain fracture types to well known surfaces and objects, terms like conchoidal (shell-like), splintery, uneven, step-like, and granular are used. Like cleavage, this is a species specific characteristic which has value in the identification of gems.

[Citrine quartz: conchoidal, Charoite: splintery]

[Turquoise: granular, coral: uneven]

Conchoidal fracture is the most common, and is found in corundum, beryls, all the quartzes, opals, and both natural and man-made glasses. Turquoise and coral are commonly simulated by glass.... So:

Question 4: You are offered a bag of cut turquoise or coral at a gem show. The color is lovely and the price is very tempting. You notice that one of the pieces in the parcel has a broken edge which you examine with your 10x magnifier. With no knowledge other than what you've learned about fracture, what might you see on that broken edge that would tell you that this was not real turquoise or coral after all?

Durability Factors

In Lesson One, the concept of gem durability was introduced and described as being made up of hardness, toughness and stability. Let's now look at each of these factors in more detail.

Hardness: The tendency to resist scratching in a gem is known as its hardness. Of the three factors comprising durability, it is the most familiar. Even those folks with just a passing interest in gems know that they can be ranked on a scale of hardness. Hardness is primarily the result of the strength of the chemical bonds between the gem's constituent atoms (how tightly they are bound to one another).

The hardness of a gem affects its wearability, luster, and resistance to cutting and polishing. All other factors being equal, harder gems are more useable in jewelry, develop a brighter surface luster, and take more time and effort to cut and polish. They will retain their polish longer than softer gems, given equal wear and tear.

The familiar 1-10 Mohs' Scale of hardness, is not an absolute measure, but rather a relative one ---> a kind of "pecking order". Gems ranked at a higher number on the scale can scratch those ranked lower, and will in turn, be scratched by those whose number is higher than theirs.

Frederich Mohs, a 19th century German mineralogist was the originator, and we still use his scale, with the minerals which he designated as reference points today. For example, (softest) talc = 1, quartz = 7 and diamond = 10 (hardest).

[Talc, the softest on the Mohs' scale, diamond, the hardest]

**Check the text: (Pg. 16 in the Hall text shows a picture of all of the "type" minerals for the steps on the scale)

In mineralogy, one of the key tests commonly used for purposes of identification is a "scratch" test, which is done with a set of implements known as hardness points. These, usually steel, "pencils" are tipped with various minerals (or metals) of known hardness. By drawing them across the surface of an unknown mineral sequentially, the tester can determine the sample's approximate hardness. In gemology, such tests are rarely used as they are destructive in nature. Exceptions might be in testing the bottom of a carving, or a piece of gem rough, or a bit of material which has broken off. Another drawback of the standard hardness points is that they are not precise, but limited to giving a "ballpark" estimate.

In a laboratory setting, exquisitely precise measurements can be made with sclerometers. These devices use diamond-tipped, hydraulically operated probes, and can give an absolute reading on the force necessary to penetrate the surface of a material.

Check the text: (Pg. 16 of Hall's book, you can see in the "Knoop"Scale: the results of such sclerometer tests using the Mohs' indicator minerals. A quick study of the diagram makes it clear that the Mohs' scale is not linear. Note that a mineral with a reading of 5 on the Mohs', is not penetrated by half the force needed for a material ranked at 10. Corundum at 9 on the Mohs' is often incorrectly spoken of as "almost" as hard as diamond (10). In reality it takes many times as much force to penetrate a diamond surface as a corundum one!

Not many hikers, nature lovers, or rockhounds carry hardness points with around with them on their treks, but the use of just a few ordinary materials can allow such individuals to do pretty good hardness tests in the field.

The Practical or Field Mohs' Scale

1-2: easily scratched by fingernail

3-4: scratched by copper coin

5-6: easily, and not so easily, scratched with pocket knife

7: scratches window glass/scratched by steel file

8-10: scratches window glass, but not scratched by steel file:

Hardness can be directional. This is actually quite understandable, as it depends on chemical bonds which can differ in strength, and in distance from each other, depending on which axis of the crystal we are observing. Generally such differences are relatively small and of litttle consequence, but there are two notable cases where they are dramatic and important. 1) Kyanite is notoriously difficult to cut because of its extreme directional hardness differences. 2) Diamond cutting would scarcely be possible unless the cutters could use the directional hardness of that gem to their advantage (More about diamond cutting to come in Lesson 7).

Check the text: Page 133 in the Hall book gives more information on kyanite's directional hardness properties.

SOFT GEMS:

[Ivory and jet: 2.5, pearl: 3, sphalerite: 3.5, fluorite: 4]

GEMS OF INTERMEDIATE HARDNESS

[Scapolite: 6, Tanzanite: 6.5; garnet: 7 - 7.5 depending on species, tourmaline: 7.5]

HARD GEMS

[Spinel & topaz: 8; chrysoberyl: 8.5, sapphire: 9]

Toughness: The tendency to resist breaking and chipping is known as a gem's toughness. This property is controlled primarily by two factors: the readiness of a material to cleave in single crystal gems, and the presence or absense of certain structural characteristics in aggregate and/or amorphous gems which promote strength and cohesion.

All other factors being equal, the harder the gem, the tougher it will be, but all other factors are not always equal. Take the case of topaz, for example. At hardness 8 it seems to be a pretty rugged gem, but if we consider its strong tendency to cleave in one direction, in reality, it is rather fragile.

Likewise, diamond, the "star" of the hardness game, is only ranked as "good" when it comes to toughness because of its cleavage and fracture potential. Diamonds are usually cut with a flat culet facet at the tip of their pavilion, rather than coming to a sharp point as do colored stones. This is due to the likelihood of a fracture (or cleavage) in the fragile culet zone. When purchasing a diamond it is a good idea to check the girdle under magnification to make sure that it is not excessively thin, as this is another site of special vulnerability. Likewise, the corners and points of cuts like baguettes, trillions and marquis are vulnerable, and should be protected by the mounting when used in jewelry.

[Fracture on the girdle of a diamond: Image courtesy of Martin Fuller, cleavages on diamond with classic "staircase" pattern]

On the other hand, nephrite jade with its hardness of 6.5 might seem to be delicate, but due to the felted, fibrous nature of its aggregate crystals, it is literally the toughest gem on Earth! So it is with pearls, which with their extremely low hardness, would barely be wearable at all, except for their moderately good toughness. It results from the layered, overlapping nature of the aragonite mineral plates of which the pearls are made, and the proteinaceous "mortar" that holds these brick-like layers together.

Check the Web: In this short article with interesting micro-photos, researchers summarize recent advances in materials science whereby they attempt to make an artificial material with the structure and toughness of Mother of Pearl (nacre) that might be used, among other things, for bone grafts. http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060128/fob2.asp

Toughness affects both wearability and resistance to polishing. Jade gems thousands of years old are as beautiful today as when they were first made. A well polished jade is a sign of a dedicated and skillful lapidary, as its structural characteristics make it susceptible to "undercutting" and an "orange peel" surface effect if not handled expertly and with patience.

There is no numeric scale on which toughness is measured, rather, relative terms such as: exceptional, excellent, good, fair and poor are used.

FRAGILE GEMS

[Topaz, sunstone, sodalite, serpentine: all poor]

 

GEMS OF INTERMEDIATE TOUGHNESS

[Tourmaline, iolite: fair; chrysoprase (quartz), diamond: good]

TOUGH GEMS

[Sapphire, hematite: excellent; jadeite jade, nephrite jade: exceptional]

Stability: Stability in a gem is a measure of its ability to resist changes due to exposure to light, heat and/or chemicals. Not only does stability affect wearability, but it also dictates appropriate ways of fashioning, cleaning and storing the gems. Most gems are stable, but a few (even some quite popular ones) are unstable, and must be handled accordingly.

The Effects of Heat

Dehydration: Heat is a factor that can create problems with certain gems. In some cases, the mineral comprising the gem is "hydrated", that is, it contains water molecules which adhere chemically with varying degrees of tenacity. When the water is rather loosely attached, hot dry air can lead to loss of some of the water, and changes in the color, or transparency of the gem. Even more seriously, its loss can cause a network of cracks to form in the gem, in a process called "crazing". Opal is the most well known gem for which this is an issue.

[Badly crazed opal: Image courtesy of Bill Wise]

It is sometimes suggested that opal gems and jewelry items be stored in water or oil when not being worn --> this is NOT good advice. Water will not hurt the opal, but it will not help it either. The type of "chemically linked" water that is lost when crazing occurs cannot be replaced by soaking, nor can this procedure be used as a preventative.

It is the structural details of the particular type of opal, including the percentage of water in it, that determine the likelihood of crazing. Reputable opal dealers "proof" their material before it is sold, by subjecting it to hot dry conditions for months. Generally, those pieces that survive such treatment will be stable under normal wearing conditions.

(Leaving an opal on a car dashboard for hours in the August sun, or forgetting that your opal ring is in your pants pocket, and then putting the pants in the dryer for an hour on high, would NOT be examples of normal wearing conditions! Soaking in oil is an especially bad idea as opal is a porous gem and the oil seeps inside and then discolors over time, degrading the gem's beauty. )

Thermal Expansion: Another problem that heat creates for some gems is caused by their inherent capacity for "thermal expansion". This is a yet another physical characteristic by which gems differ. Diamond is notably stable to temperature changes (with slow and even rates of thermal expansion), so much so, that jewelers can pour molten metal into molds containing wax models with the diamonds already in place, to cast pre-set jewelry pieces.

Other gems, such as apatite, expand so rapidly with sharp rise in temperature, that their crystal structure is damaged, and they crack or even shatter. Heat sensitivity of that degree makes it very important for lapidaries cutting such gems, and jewelers working on mountings containing them, to keep the gem cool during these processes.

The Effect of Inclusions: Although a gem might be quite temperature stable itself, inclusions of other minerals within it, could have different degrees of thermal expansion from their host. This situation becomes quite important in the heat treatment processes used to enhance gems. Internal inclusions can literally explode or, less dramatically, expand, and in doing so, create internal "stress cracks" in the gem being treated. (For this reason, it is standard practice among Tanzanite heat treaters to heat only cut stones which have had virtually all the inclusions removed, and to avoid heating rough material.)

To an extent, heat treaters can ameliorate such effects by very, very, slowly raising and lowering temperatures. Tanzanite heaters might take 12 to 24 hours to incrementally reach the desired temperature, hold the gems there for several hours, and then take another 12 to 24 hours to gradually cool them down. At the highest temperature levels, though, such as those required to heat treat corundum, or those used for "color diffusion" processes, nothing can prevent heat damage. This is good news in a sense, though, because such internal and external cues to the heating, help the jeweler or gemologist spot the gem as one which has been subjected to extreme temperatures.

[In the center of this picture of the interior of a gem under high magnification, you see an included, heat shattered crystal, broken into four pieces, and a series of stress fractures surrounding it--> positive evidence of high heat treatment in this gem]

There are cases where thermal expansion characteristics of gems are used to deliberately induce cracks or stress fractures. Pieces of amber which have been heated, and then quickly cooled, develop disk-like stress fractures called "sun spangles" which some consider to be attractive.

["Sun Spangles", stress fractures in heated amber]

A very old method of dyeing gems, which is still occasionally used today, is called "quench crackling"--> single crystal gems, like quartz, for example, which would ordinarily not absorb dye are heated and plunged in cold water to fill them with cracks that, then, can take up the dye, giving apparent color to the whole piece.

[Quench-crackled quartz pebble dyed pink, the closeup shows clearly that the pink dye is confined just to the cracks]

Other Environmental Factors:

Light: Some gems can fade or change color when exposed to light. An extreme example of this phenomenon is seen in the rare mineral pyrargyrite which must be kept constantly under opaque covers or else light exposure quickly renders its originally red color completely black. In the case of gem minerals, there are only a few to be concerned about. Kunzite (pink spodumene) can lighten in color with long term exposure to bright light, and is sometimes suggested as an "evening only" gem. Certain brown topazes, notably those from Mexico, can lighten dramatically, even becoming colorless with continuous light exposure.

Chemicals: Exposure to various chemicals can ruin the polish of, and/or discolor certain gems. Two important cases would be carbonate gems, like rhodocrosite, which degrade due to a chemical reaction when exposed to acids, and amber which can be dissolved by acetone. It is doubtful that a drop of lemonade, or vinagrette salad dressing, or a bit of spilled nail polish remover would harm such stones, but acid vapors found in the polluted air of many cities can take their toll over time, as can some intense solvents, such as paint strippers, which might be used in the home or workplace. A dip in certain jewelers' solutions, like the hot "pickle" used to remove oxidation from metals, would be devastating to rhodocrosite, while a few hours spent soaking in "Attack^TM" (a solvent used to remove glues used in jewelry making) would ruin an amber gem.

Most gems in the unstable category, however; are sensitive more in virtue of their porosity, than because of their chemical makeup. Pearls and turquoise are two gems well known for their propensity to absorb cosmetics, perfumes, body oils, sweat, etc., and to dull and discolor as a result. Often fine turquoise gems are given a final polish with a layer of colorless paraffin wax to help seal and protect them from such degradation.

Lightly wiping chemically sensitive gems with a damp cloth after each wearing will help to keep them in good shape. Any gem which is suspected, or known, to be chemical or heat sensitive should be protected from steam or solvent cleaning methods. Such considerations also become a factor in gemological testing in that, turquoise, for example, cannot be placed in the chemicals that would be used to determine specific gravity, or those used in relative refractive index testing.

UNSTABLE GEMS

[Apatite and opal: heat sensitive, Mexican brown topaz: fades in light, turquoise: porous and likely to discolor with exposure to various materials]

Specific Gravity

Specific gravity, also known as relative density, differs widely among gemstones, and is one of their most important physical characteristics from the viewpoint of gem identification. Specific gravity (SG) is the ratio of the weight of one unit volume of the gem to the weight of the same unit of water. For example, to say sapphire (corundum) has SG = 4.0, means precisely that a cubic inch of sapphire weighs four times as much as a cubic inch of water. In natural gems, SG values range from just over 1 (1.08 for amber) to just short of 7 (6.95 for cassiterite).

LIGHT GEMS: SG < 3.O

[Amber: 1.08;, shell: 1.30, meerschaum: 1.50, opal: 2.10]

 

MEDIUM DENSITY GEMS: SG: 3 - 4

[Andalusite: 3.16, jadeite: 3.33, chrysoberyl: 3.71, sapphire: 4.00]

 

HEAVY GEMS: SG > 4

[Zircon: 4.69, scheelite: 6.10, anglesite: 6.35, cassiterite: 6.95]

A curious student might ask at this point: "Why do specific gravities differ so much?" The answer, satisfyingly, goes back to the basic premise of this lesson (that all physical properties of gems are the result of their chemical and structural makeup).

The various elements of which gems are made have atoms of different weights. Atoms of gaseous elements like hydrogen and oxygen are light, while metallic elements like aluminum and iron have heavy atoms. Chemists use "atomic weights" to describe elements --> rounding them off, here are some examples: hydrogen = 1, carbon = 12, oxygen = 16, aluminum = 27, silicon = 28, calcium = 40, iron = 56, zinc = 65, and lead = 207.

It's quite logical, then, that a cubic inch block of lead is going to weigh much more than a cubic inch block of aluminum. Extending that idea to gems, we can see that if a gem is made of relatively heavy elements it will have a greater SG than if it is made of lighter ones.

There is a second factor to consider, however; which is the structure: How are those atoms put together? Are they tightly packed or loosely arrayed? The examples below will help to illustrate the interplay of chemical make-up and crystal structure in determining specific gravity.

1) First, let's look at the case where structure is held constant but atomic makeup is different. Here, we'll compare two minerals that have the same crystal structure, in this case they both are of the orthorhombic system, and, they have identical chemical formulas except for substitution of one element for another.

Calcite: CaCO₃ -vs- Smithsonite: ZnCO₃

Both consist of five atoms per unit: either a Ca or a Zn plus one carbon and three oxygens. Both are put together with the "atomic packing" characteristic of the orthorhombic system of crystals. Their SGs differ though, with calcite = 2.71 and Smithsonite = 4.35.

Looking at the list above and seeing that calcium's atomic weight is 40 and that of zinc is 65 gives us our answer!

Question 5: Suppose we had a 6 mm round calcite, and a 6 mm round Smithsonite, cut to the same proportions--> Which would be heavier? Or to turn it around, if we had a one carat round calcite and a one carat round Smithsonite, which would be bigger?

2) Now to examine the effect of structure, by holding the chemical makeup constant... Remembering the concept of "polymorphs" from the first part of this lesson, we'll compare calcite and aragonite. Both have the same chemical formula, CaCO₃:

Calcite: orthorhombic crystal system -vs- aragonite: trigonal crystal system

Both are made up of the same elements in the same proportions, but those building blocks are put together differently so their SGs differ, with calcite = 2.71 and aragonite = 2.94

Question 6: Suppose we had a 6 mm round calcite, and a 6 mm round aragonite, cut to the same proportions--> Which would be heavier? Or to turn it around, if we had a one carat round calcite and a one round carat aragonite: which would be bigger?

Question 7: Look up the SGs for gold and platinum in the back of the Hall text. (Even if platinum sold for the same price as gold, which it doesn't) why would it cost more to make a particular size and type of ring in platinum than in gold?

Measuring Specific Gravity:

Although SG measurements can be made on either rough or cut gems, the gems must be unmounted, and composed of a single material. You cannot do a SG measurement on a gem that is set in a piece of jewelry, or on an assembled stone, like a doublet. Porous gems cannot be measured with at least two of the techniques, as the liquid they absorb affects the SG measurement, and, in some cases, can harm the stone. Detailed reference books meant for mineralogists or gemologists will list SGs for gems as a range, rather than a single number, due to the fact that individual specimens will differ slightly based on the number and type of their inclusions. (Your texts, meant for non-professional use, however, use a single number average of the SG range for the gem species). There are several ways in which SG is measured, and they differ in precision as well as suitability to different gems and circumstances.

Hefting: The crudest technique, but one that can be rather useful in some situations, is simple hefting. By lifting the gem and gently throwing it up in the air and catching it, a general feel for its density can be gained. This technique is often all that is needed to discriminate plastic and some glass imitations from the much denser gems they mimic. Conversely, jewelers who are intimately familiar with the heft of a 6.5 mm diamond (which will weigh almost exactly one carat) may be able to quickly pick out a 6.5 mm imposter because so many diamond simulants have SGs substantially higher or lower than diamond.

Heavy Liquids: For most of us, though, in most circumstances, hefting would not supply enough information. One popular method is based on the principle of bouyancy: "an object will sink in a fluid of lesser SG, remain suspended in one of equal SG, and float in one of higher SG." This technique uses a set of "heavy" liquids with known SGs. By immersing the unknown gem material in the liquids, and observing its behavior, its approximate SG can be deduced.

[Heavy Liquids Testing Set, SGs of liquids are printed on bottles, dropper bottles are for calibration]

To give a simple example, consider an unknown gem that floats quickly in the 3.05 bottle, sinks rapidly in th 2.57 bottle, and floats and sinks very slowly in the 2.67 and 2.62 bottles, respectively. That would tell you that the SG was between 2.67 and 2.62 and would allow you to rule out a great many minerals and focus any further tests on a smaller group of "possibles". Corundum (SG = 4.0) would behave quite differently from these observations, and could be excluded, while quartz, whose SG is 2.65 would behave precisely as described, and could not, therefore, be excluded.

Hydrostatic Weighing: By far the most precise technique for SG determination involves use of a specially modified weighing balance that allows a gem sample to be weighed in air (W_a), and also weighed in water (W_w). Using Archimedes Principle: "a body immersed in water weighs less by the volume of water displaced", and a simple calculation, SG can be determined with substantial accuracy.

SG calculation: Weight of gem in air divided by the difference between the weight in air and the weight in water, or:

SG = W_a/ W_a-W_w

[Hydrostatic weighing set-up consisting of an electronic balance with a special hanging basket apparatus in which the gem can be suspended in water without putting weight on the scale.]

Again, an example. We have an unknown gem whose weight in air is 5.10 ct and whose weight in water = 3.20 ct. The difference in the air and water weights is 1.90 ct. Using the formula: SG = 5.10 ct/1.90 ct = 2.68. Looking in the tables at the back of the Hall book we quickly find several gem possibilities close to that SG: quartz (2.65), coral (2.68), aquamarine (2.69), and scapolite (2.70). More importantly, than what it might be, a SG of 2.65 rules out a large number of possibilities that it cannot be. The gemologist, like other scientists, progresses most often by weeding out wrong hypotheses (as opposed to proving right ones!).

Final Exam (just kidding!)

Scenario: We have obtained an unknown transparent green gem from a jeweler, the label has fallen off the box, and he/she would like us to tell them what it is. Since the gem was going to be used for jewelry, we can rule out the obscure and very soft collector gems, and limit our scope to relatively common jewelry gems that come in vivid, transparent green. This leaves emerald, chrome diopside, Tsavorite garnet and tourmaline as the prime suspects. We are just getting our gemology laboratory off the ground, so all we have is some reference books, a hydrostatic weighing set up, and a set of heavy liquids. First, we'll do our SG test hydrostatically, then with the heavy liquids.

We look up the SG ranges in our reference guides:

[Is it?: emerald (SG = 2.72 +.18/-.05); tourmaline (SG = 3.06 +.20/-.06); chrome diopside (SG = 3.29 +.11/-.07) or Tsavorite garnet (SG = 3.61 +.12/-.04)]

---

HYDROSTATIC TEST

STEP ONE: WEIGH GEM IN AIR

The weight in air is: 2.420 ct.

---

STEP TWO: ASSEMBLE HYDROSTATIC WEIGHING CHAMBER AND "TARE" BALANCE

The beaker with water is actually suspended by an arm off to the side and does not put weight on the balance pan, the plastic ring which holds a little metal basket for the gem, does put weight on the balance, though. Once everything is set up, we "tare" the balance (resetting it to zero) so that it ignores the weight of the plastic ring and gem basket. Now we are ready to place the gem in the basket where it will be weighed underwater.

---

STEP THREE: WEIGH THE GEM IN WATER

The weight of the gem in water is: 1.615 ct. The difference between the weight in air and weight in water is: 2.420 ct - 1.615 ct = 0.805 ct

---

STEP FOUR: CALCULATE SG

SG = W_a/ W_a-W_w

SG = 2.420 ct /0.805 ct = 3.01

Can we eliminate any possibilites? Check the SG range of each of the four possibilities. (Assume we have made accurate measurements and our arithmetic is correct).

emerald (SG = 2.72 +.18/-.05); tourmaline (SG = 3.06 +.20/-.06); chrome diopside (SG = 3.29 +.11/-.07) or Tsavorite garnet (SG = 3.61 +.12/-.04)

The only gem whose SG range does not exclude 3.01 is: tourmaline! The others are either too high or too low to qualify. **Pretty cool.**

Testing by Heavy Liquids: Below are the results of the same test on the green gem, done with the set of heavy liquids:

3.32: gem floats rapidly

3.05 gem floats very slowly

2.67 gem sinks

2.62 gem sinks rapidly

2.52 gem sinks very rapidly

 

Based on these results, the conclusion we must draw is that the SG is below 3.05, and above 2.67 (but closer to 3.05). If this were the only available testing method, we would be able to eliminate the chrome diopside and the Tsavorite garnet, but we'd have to do some other tests to discriminate between emerald and tourmaline.

Most gemologists prefer to use the hydrostatic method, not only because of its greater precision, but also because the heavy liquids smell very bad, and have hazardous properties such that gloves and masks must be worn when using them.

HOMEMADE HEAVY LIQUID TEST FOR AMBER

[A saturated solution of salt water with amber and plastic immersed]

One fun, and safe, heavy liquid test that can be done at home uses a saturated saltwalter solution. (Make this by dissolving as much salt in room temperature distilled water as it will hold). The SG of this mini "Salt Lake" is about 1.13. Most types of natural amber will float in it (SG = 1.08) while nearly all the plastic materials used to make imitations of amber will sink as their SGs are higher than 1.13. Imitation amber is rampant in the gem marketplace (even in some of the better stores), so this is a handy trick to know.

MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

There is a very long list of esoteric physical properties which gemologists/physicists/crystallographers and others working in research labs can study and measure in gems and minerals. To finish up this section, though, I will mention just a few that have occasional usefulness for the ordinary gemologist or gem/jewelry lover, and that do not require high budget equipment.

1) Magnetism: Very few gems show any magnetic properties. One interesting exception is a certain type of synthetic diamond. In this case, a strong magnet can be a definitive way to separate these stones from natural diamonds.

Natural hematite is mildly to moderately attracted to a magnet, but an imitation version is so strongly magnetic that the difference is obvious.

2) Thermal Reaction: The response to high temperature in terms of appearance, and especially odor, can be a telling one in identifying some gems. Many organic gems such as horn, ivory, tortoise shell, and black coral smell like burning hair when touched with a "hot point" probe. Amber smells like turpentine, and jet like burning coal. Their common imitations may have odors, but not the right ones.

Although, technically destructive, this test can usually be done on a very small, inconspicuous spot. Resin, lacquer and wax coatings on gems can likewise be detected as they melt or char under the hot point. In this case, the reaction is best observed under magnification, with the hot probe not touching the surface, but just barely above it.

3) Thermal Conductivity: Gems differ quite dramatically in this property, which is basically a measure of the rate at which they conduct applied heat. For many years no savvy jeweler or pawn shop owner would be caught without a thermal conductivity tester (otherwise known as a diamond tester). By simply touching a small metal probe to the gem, it was instantly determined to be "diamond" or "not diamond". Pretty useful, huh? Well, it used to be....

A few years ago, two developments occured which have all but made these devices obsolete. 1) A new diamond simulant, called Moissanite whose thermal conductivity is close enough to diamond to pass the test, has come on the market, and 2) synthetic diamonds are now becoming a common enough to be concerned about. Man-made diamonds which have the same physical properties as the natural gems, would, of course, pass the test as diamond.

4) Electrical Conductivity: Very quickly upon the heels of the introduction of Moissanite, came the marketing of a new generation of testers which use a different tactic to separate Moissanite from diamond. Diamonds (with the vanishingly rare exception of natural blue ones) do not conduct electricity, but Moissanite does. So, out with the old and in with the new generation of diamond testers.

These machines have two systems, a thermal conductivity test, to first separate diamond and Moissanite from all other gems, then an electrical conductivity test to do the final separation should the thermal test indicate diamond. (Again, synthetic diamonds cannot be separated from natural ones with any basic physical tests).

[Mizar DiamonNite Dual Tester: Image courtesy of www.Mineralab.com]

Placing the probe on a gem initiates a thermal conductivity test to reveal CZ or other non-diamond simulants, then if the stone passes that, an electrical conductivity test follows to determine if it is diamond or Moissanite.

---

Answers to thought exercises from this lesson: (If you don't understand why these are the correct answers, then it's time to email me for help!)

1) It is probably pink tourmaline, as tourmaline has no cleavage and Kunzite has two perfect cleavages.

2) You should choose the blue sapphire. Sapphire has no cleavage and blue topaz has perfect cleavage in one direction.

3) Very thin or pointed areas on a cut gem, like the tips of a marquis cut, are areas of weakness; since apatite has cleavage, it would be much safer in a shape with smooth curves like a round or oval.

4) Seeing a conchoidal fracture pattern on the edge of the broken piece would indicate that is not turquoise (or coral) whose fractures are granular and uneven, respectively, but it could very well be glass.

5) The 6 mm Smithsonite is quite a bit heavier than the same sized calcite. The one carat calcite is noticeably larger than the same weight Smithsonite.

6) The 6 mm aragonite is a bit heavier than the same sized calcite. The one carat calcite is slightly larger than the same weight aragonite.

7) Even if gold and platinum were equally priced per ounce, the amount of platinum required for a given size and shape ring would weigh more (because it is denser) making the platinum ring more expensive.

---

You have now completed the web lecture for the third lesson! Go back the the course website to: 1) complete and submit the homework assignment on the text readings and assigned web essays 2) take the non-graded practice quiz on this web lecture 3) post a comment to the discussion board for this lesson, and 4) when it is available, complete the graded quiz based on this web lecture.When you're ready, proceed on to Lesson Four: Optical Properties of Gems