4.6 Our Picks
Although processor makers probably hate us for saying so, the
processor
actually plays a relatively minor role in overall system performance.
The difference in absolute processor performance between a $50
processor and a $500 processor may be a factor of two or less. Nor
does buying a $500 processor make your system run twice as fast,
because processor speed is only one element of system performance.
Before you plunk down $500 for a processor, consider instead spending
that extra money on more memory, a faster video card, a SCSI hard
drive, or all of those.
- Inexpensive systems (sub $1,000)
-
Intel Celeron 4. We recommend the
Intel Celeron 4 processor largely because of the many top-notch
integrated motherboards available for it. Yes, you can find cheap
Pentium 4 and Athlon systems in this price range, but those systems
are built to a price point using components of lower quality than we
feel comfortable using. The AMD Duron is also an attractive
processor. Many inexpensive systems are built around the Duron, which
has higher performance clock-for-clock than the Celeron, but most
inexpensive Duron systems use VIA-based motherboards, which we find
unacceptable. For a stable system with reasonably good performance,
it's hard to beat the Celeron. We'd
choose the fastest retail-boxed Celeron you can find for about $85.
- Mainstream and performance systems ($1,000 to $2,500+)
-
Intel Pentium 4. For mainstream and
performance systems, we recommend the Intel Pentium 4. Pentium 4
processors do not match the AMD Athlon in performance
clock-for-clock, and cost more for equivalent performance, but once
again the superiority of Intel chipsets and motherboards in terms of
stability, reliability, and build quality is more than enough to
offset the price and performance advantages of AMD Athlon processors.
As with the Celerons, the fastest Pentium 4 models sell at a high
premium compared to models that are only slightly slower.
We'd choose the fastest Socket 478 Northwood-core
Pentium 4 processor available for $175 or so.
- Dual-processor system
-
AMD Athlon
MP. If you run Windows NT/2000/XP Pro, Linux, or another
SMP-capable operating system, a dual-processor system is worth
serious consideration. In our experience, responsiveness in a
multitasking environment is better with two midrange processors than
with one fast processor. No one task runs as fast on the dual-CPU
system as it would on the faster single processor, but the dual-CPU
machine simply doesn't bog down. If you choose
components carefully, you can build a dual-processor Athlon system
for only $250 or so more than the cost of a comparable mainstream
system. If you're willing to use Duron
processors—which are not officially supported for SMP
operation—rather than Athlon XP processors, you can cut the
price differential to nearly nothing. Your system
won't run any one single-threaded task as fast as it
would with a faster single processor, but it won't
bog down when you're running many tasks, as the fast
single-processor system would.
If our only choice in dual-processor Athlon systems required using a
third-party chipset, we'd bite the bullet and choose
Intel Xeon processors. Fortunately, that's not the
case. The AMD 760MP and AMD 760MPX chipsets are superb, and
motherboards built around them are fast and stable, assuming you use
top-quality memory and a good power supply. As with Intel processors,
faster versions of the Athlon XP cost much more but provide little
performance benefit. For a dual-processor system, buy two identical
copies of the fastest retail-boxed AMD Athlon XP processors you can
find for less than $200 each.
We constantly test and review processors. For the latest information
about which specific processors we currently recommend by brand and
model, visit:
- http://www.hardwareguys.com/picks/processors.html.
We also maintain a frequently updated set of system guides that
detail our currently recommended system configurations for various
purposes and in various price ranges. You can view the latest system
guides at:
- http://www.hardwareguys.com/guides/guides.html
|