Which setteth forth many fair Lineaments of
divine Truth, and saith very lofty and
lovely things touching a
perfect life
Edited by Dr. Peiffer
Translated by Susanna Winkworth
Scanned by John H. Richards ([email protected]), March
1995
This work was discovered and published in 1516 by Martin Luther, who said of it that "Next to the Bible and St. Augustine, no book has ever come into my hands from which I have learnt more of God and Christ, and man and all things that are." It has since appealed to Christians of all persuasions.
Which setteth forth many fair Lineaments of
divine Truth, and saith very lofty and
lovely things touching a
perfect life
EDITED BY DR. PEIFFER FROM THE ONLY
COMPLETE MANUSCRIPT YET KNOWN
Translated from the German by
Susanna Winkworth
With a Preface by the Rev. Charles Kingsley
Rector of Eversley, and a Letter
to the Translator by the
Chevalier Bunsen, D.D., D.C.L., etc.
First published as a volume of the Golden Treasury Series in 1874. New
Edition 1893
Reprinted 1901, 1907
Scanned from the 1893 Golden Treasury Series edition
Introductory material scanned from the 1907 reprint
This electronic text is in the public domain
by John H. Richards
([email protected]), March 1995
by Harry Plantinga
([email protected]), 1996
This work was discovered and published in 1516 by Martin Luther, who said of it
that "Next to the Bible and St. Augustine, no book has ever come into my hands
from which I have learnt more of God and Christ, and man and all things that
are." It has since appealed to Christians of all persuasions.
STRONG Son of God,
Immortal Love,
Whom
we, that have not seen Thy face,
By faith, and faith alone embrace,
Believing where we
cannot prove.
*
* * * *
Thou seemest human
and divine,
The
highest, holiest manhood Thou;
Our wills are ours, we know not how,
Our wills are ours
to make them Thine.
*
* * * *
O Living Will that
shalt endure,
When
all that seems shall suffer shock
Rise in the spiritual Rock,
Flow through our
deeds and make them pure.
*
* * * *
That we may lift,
from out the dust,
A
voice as unto Him that hears,
A cry above the conquered years,
To one that with us
works, and trust
*
* * * *
With faith that
comes of self-control
The
truths that never can be proved,
Until we close with all we loved
find all we flow
from, soul in soul.
HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION
LETTER FROM CHEVALIER BUNSEN TO THE TRANSLATOR
THEOLOGIA GERMANICA
CHAPTER II. Of what Sin is, and how we must not take unto ourselves any good Thing, seeing that it belongeth unto the true Good alone.
CHAPTER III. How Man's Fall and going astray must be amended as Adam's Fall was.
CHAPTER IV. How Man, when he claimeth any good Thing for his own, falleth, and toucheth God in His Honour.
CHAPTER V. How we are to take that Saying, that we must come to be without Will, Wisdom, Love, Desire, Knowledge, and the like.
CHAPTER VI. How that which is best and noblest should also be loved above all Things by us, merely because it is the best.
CHAPTER VII. Of the Eyes of the Spirit wherewith Man looketh into Eternity and into Time, and how the one is hindered of the other in its Working.
CHAPTER VIII. How the Soul of Man, while it is yet in the Body, may obtain a Foretaste of eternal Blessedness.
CHAPTER IX. How it is better and more profitable for a Man that he should perceive what God will do with him, or to what end He will make Use of him, than if he knew all that Gad had ever wrought, or would ever work through all the Creatures; and how Blessedness lieth alone in God, and not in the Creatures, or in any Works.
CHAPTER X. How the perfect Men have no other Desire than that they may be to the Eternal Goodness what His Hand is to a Man, and how they have lost the Fear of Hell, and Hope of Heaven.
CHAPTER XI. How a righteous Man in this present Time is brought into hell, and there cannot be comforted, and how he is taken out of Hell and carried into Heaven, and there cannot be troubled.
CHAPTER XII. Touching that true inward Peace, which Christ left to His Disciples at the last.
CHAPTER XIII. How a Man may cast aside Images too soon.
CHAPTER XIV. Of three Stages by which a Man is led upwards till he attaineth true Perfection.
CHAPTER XV. How all Men are dead in Adam and are made alive again in Christ, and of true Obedience and Disobedience.
CHAPTER XVI. Telleth us what is the old Man, and what is the new Man.
CHAPTER XVII. How we are not to take unto ourselves what we have done well: but only what we have done amiss.
CHAPTER XVIII. How that the Life of Christ is the noblest and best Life that ever hath been or can be, and how a careless Life of false Freedom is the worst Life that can be.
CHAPTER XIX. How we cannot come to the true Light and Christ's Life, by much Questioning or Reading, or by high natural Skill and Reason, but by truly renouncing ourselves and all Things.
CHAPTER XX. How, seeing that the Life of Christ is most bitter to Nature and Self, Nature will have none of it, and chooseth a false careless Life, as is most convenient to her.
CHAPTER XXI. How a friend of Christ willingly fulfilleth by his outward Works, such Things as must be and ought to be, and doth not concern himself with the rest.
CHAPTER XXII. How sometimes the Spirit of God, and sometimes also the Evil Spirit may possess a Man and have the mastery over him.
CHAPTER XXIlI. He who will submit himself to God and be obedient to Him, must be ready to bear with all Things; to wit, God, himself, and all Creatures, and must be obedient to them all whether he have to suffer or to do.
CHAPTER XXIV. How that four Things are needful before a Man can receive divine Truth and be possessed with the Spirit of God.
CHAPTER XXV. Of two evil Fruits that do spring up from the Seed of the Evil Spirit, and are two Sisters who love to dwell together. The one is called spiritual Pride and Highmindedness, the other is false, lawless Freedom.
CHAPTER XXVI. Touching Poorness of Spirit and true Humility and whereby we may discern the true and lawful free Men whom the Truth hath made free.
CHAPTER XXVII. How we are to take Christ's Words when He bade forsake all Things; and wherein the Union with the Divine Will standeth.
CHAPTER XXVIII. How, after a Union with the Divine Will, the inward Man standeth immoveable, the while the outward Man is moved hither and thither.
CHAPTER XXIX. How a Man may not attain so high before Death as not to be moved or touched by outward Things.
CHAPTER XXX. On what wise we may came to be beyond and above all Custom, Order, Law, Precepts and the like.
CHAPTER XXXI. How we are not to cast off the Life of Christ, but practise it diligently, and walk in it until Death
CHAPTER XXXII. How God is a true, simple, perfect Good, and how He is a Light and a Reason and all Virtues, and how what is highest and best, that is, God, ought to be most loved by us.
CHAPTER XXXIII. How when a Man is made truly Godlike, his Love is pure and unmixed, and he loveth all Creatures, and doth his best for them.
CHAPTER XXXIV. How that if a Man will attain to that which is best, he must forswear his own Will; and he who helpeth a Man to his own Will helpeth him to the worst Thing he can.
CHAPTER XXXV. How there is deep and true Humility and Poorness of Spirit in a Man who is "made a Partaker of the Divine Nature."
CHAPTER XXXVI. How nothing is contrary to God but Sin only; and what Sin is in Kind and Act.
CHAPTER XXXVII. How in God, as God, there can neither be Grief, Sorrow, Displeasure, nor the like, but how it is otherwise in a Man who is "made a Partaker of the Divine Nature."
CHAPTER XXXVIII. How we are to put on the Life of Christ from Love, and not for the sake of Reward, and how we must never grow careless concerning it, or cast it off.
CHAPTER XXXIX. How God will have Order, Custom, Measure, and the like in the Creature, seeing that He cannot have them without the Creature, and of four sorts of Men who are concerned with this Order, Law, and Custom.
CHAPTER XL. A good Account of the False Light and its Kind.
CHAPTER XLI. Now that he is to be called, and is truly, a Partaker of the Divine Nature, who is illuminated with the Divine Light, and inflamed with Eternal Love, and how Light and Knowledge are worth nothing without Love.
CHAPTER XLII. A Question: whether we can know God and not love Him, and how there are two kinds of Light and Love -- a true and a false.
CHAPTER XLIII. Whereby we may know a Man who is made a partaker of the divine Nature, and what belongeth unto him; and further, what is the token of a False Light, and a False Free-Thinker.
CHAPTER XLIV. How nothing is contrary to God but Self-will and how he who seeketh his own Good for his own sake, findeth it not; and how a Man of himself neither knoweth nor can do any good Thing.
CHAPTER XLV. How that where there is a Christian Life, Christ dwelleth, and how Christ's Life is the best and most admirable Life that ever hath been or can be.
CHAPTER XLVI. How entire Satisfaction and true Rest are to be found in God alone, and not in any Creature; and how he who Will be obedient unto God, must also be obedient to the Creatures, with all Quietness, and he who would love God, must love all Things in One.
CHAPTER XLVII. A Question: Whether, if we ought to love all Things, we ought to love Sin also?
CHAPTER XLVIII. How we must believe certain Things of God's Truth beforehand, ere we can come to a true Knowledge and Experience thereof.
CHAPTER XLIX. Of Self-will, and how Lucifer and Adam fell away from God through Self-will.
CHAPTER L. How this present Time is a Paradise and outer Court of Heaven, and how therein there is only one Tree forbidden, that is, Self-will.
CHAPTER LI. Wherefore God hath created Self-will, seeing that it is so contrary to Him.
CHAPTER LII. How we must take those two Sayings of Christ: "No Man cometh unto the Father, but by Me," and "No Man cometh unto Me, except the Father which hath sent Me draw him."
CHAPTER LIII. Considereth that other saying of Christ, "No Man can come unto Me, except the Father, which hath sent Me, draw him."
CHAPTER LIV. How a Man shall not seek his own, either in Things spiritual or natural but the Honour of God only; and how he must enter in by the right Door, to wit, by Christ, into Eternal Life.
TO those who really hunger and thirst after righteousness; and who therefore
long to know what righteousness is, that they may copy it: To those who long to
be freed, not merely from the punishment of sin after they die, but from sin
itself while they live on earth; and who therefore wish to know what sin is,
that they may avoid it: To those who wish to be really justified by faith, by
being made just persons by faith; and who cannot satisfy either their
consciences or reasons by fancying that God looks on them as right, when they
know themselves to be wrong, or that the God of truth will stoop to fictions
(miscalled forensic) which would be considered false and unjust in any human
court of law: To those who cannot help trusting that union with Christ must be
something real and substantial, and not merely a metaphor, and a flower of
rhetoric: To those, lastly, who cannot help seeing that the doctrine of Christ
in every man, as the Indwelling Word of God, The Light who lights every one who
comes into the world, is no peculiar tenet of the Quakers, but one which runs
through the whole of the Old and New Testaments, and without which they would
both be unintelligible, just as the same doctrine runs through the whole
history of the Early Church for the first two centuries, and is the only
explanation of them;
To all these this noble little book
will recommend itself; and may God bless the reading of it to them, and to all
others no less.
As for its orthodoxy; to "evangelical" Christians
Martin Luther's own words ought to be sufficient warrant. For he has said that
he owed more to this, than to any other book, saving the Bible and Saint
Augustine. Those, on the other hand, to whom Luther's name does not seem a
sufficient guarantee, must recollect, that the Author of this book was a knight
of the Teutonic order; one who considered himself, and was considered, as far
as we know, by his contemporaries, an orthodox member of the Latin Church; that
his friends and disciples were principally monks exercising a great influence
in the Catholic Church of their days; that one of their leaders was appointed
by Pope John XXII. Nuncio and overseer of the Dominican order in Germany; and
that during the hundred and seventy years which elapsed between the writing of
this book and the Reformation, it incurred no ecclesiastical censure
whatsoever, in generations which were but too fond of making men offenders for
a word.
Not that I agree with all which is to be found in
this book. It is for its noble views of righteousness and of sin that I honour
it, and rejoice at seeing it published in English, now for the first time from
an edition based on the perfect manuscript. But even in those points in which I
should like to see it altered, I am well aware that there are strong
authorities against me. The very expression, for instance, which most startles
me, "vergottet," deified or made divine, is used, word for word, both by
Saint Athanase and Saint Augustine, the former of whom has said: "He became
man, that we might be made God;"[1] and the
latter, "He called men Gods, as being deified by His grace, not as born of His
substance."[2] There are many passages,
moreover, in the Epistles of the Apostles, which, if we paraphrase them at all,
we can hardly paraphrase in weaker words. It seems to me safer and wiser to
cling to the letter of Scripture: but God forbid that I should wish to make
such a man as the Author of the Theologia Germanica an offender for a
word!
One point more may be worthy of remark. In many
obscure passages of this book, words are used, both by the Author and by the
Translator, in their strict, original, and scientific meaning, as they are used
in the Creeds, and not in that meaning which has of late crept into our very
pulpits, under the influence of Locke's philosophy. When, for instance, it is
said that God is the Substance of all things; this expression, in the
vulgar Lockite sense of substance, would mean that God is the matter or stuff
of which all things are made; which would be the grossest Pantheism: but
"Substance" in the true and ancient meaning of the word, as it appears in the
Athanasian Creed, signifies the very opposite; namely, that which stands
under the appearance and the matter; that by virtue of which a thing has
its form, its life, its real existence, as far as it may have any; and thus in
asserting that God is the substance of all things, this book means that
everything (except sin, which is no thing, but the disease and fall of a thing)
is a thought of God.
So again with Eternity. It will be found in this
book to mean not merely some future endless duration, but that ever-present
moral world, governed by ever-living and absolutely necessary laws, in which we
and all spirits are now; and in which we should be equally, whether time and
space, extension and duration, and the whole material universe to which they
belong, became nothing this moment, or lasted endlessly.
I think it necessary to give these cautions,
because by the light of Locke's philosophy, little or nothing will be discerned
in this book, and what little is discerned will probably be utterly
misunderstood. If any man wishes to see clearly what is herein written, let him
try to forget all popular modern dogmas and systems, all popular philosophies
(falsely so called), and be true to the letter of his Bible, and to the
instincts which the Indwelling Word of God was wont to awaken in his heart,
while he was yet a little unsophisticated child; and then let him be sure that
he will find in this book germs of wider and deeper wisdom than its good author
ever dreamed of; and that those great spiritual laws, which the Author only
applies, and that often inconsistently, to an ascetic and passively
contemplative life, will hold just as good in the family, in the market, in the
senate, in the study, ay, in the battlefield itself; and teach him the way to
lead, in whatsoever station of life he may be placed, a truly manlike, because
a truly Christlike and Godlike, life.
CHARLES KINGSLEY.
Torquay,
Lent, 1854.
THE Treatise before us was discovered by Luther, who first brought it into
notice by an Edition of it which he published in 1516. A Second Edition, which
came out two years later, he introduced with the following Preface: --
"We read that St. Paul, though he was of a
weak and contemptible presence, yet wrote weighty and powerful letters, and he
boasts of himself that his 'speech is not with enticing words of man's device,'
but 'full of the riches of all knowledge and wisdom.' And if we consider the
wondrous ways of God, it is clear, that He hath never chosen mighty and
eloquent preachers to speak His word, but as it is written: 'Out of the mouths
of babes and sucklings hast thou perfected praise,' Ps. 8:2. And again, 'For
wisdom opened the mouth of the dumb, and made the tongues of them that cannot
speak eloquent,' Wisdom 10:21. Again, He blameth such as are high-minded and
are offended at these simple ones. Consilium inopis, etc. 'Ye have made
a mock at the counsel of the poor, because he putteth his trust in the Lord,'
Ps. 14:6.
"This I say because I will have every one warned
who readeth this little book, that he should not take offence, to his own hurt,
at its bad German, or its crabbed and uncouth words. For this noble book,
though it be poor and rude in words, is so much the richer and more precious in
knowledge and divine wisdom. And I will say, though it be boasting of myself
and 'I speak as a fool,' that next to the Bible and St. Augustine, no book hath
ever come into my hands, whence I have learnt, or would wish to learn more of
what God, and Christ, and man and all things are; and now I first find the
truth of what certain of the learned have said in scorn of us theologians of
Wittemberg, that we would be thought to put forward new things, as though there
had never been men elsewhere and before our time. Yea, verily, there have been
men, but God's wrath, provoked by our sins, hath not judged us worthy to see
and hear them; for it is well known that for a long time past such things have
not been treated of in our universities; nay, it has gone so far, that the Holy
Word of God is not only laid on the shelf, but is almost mouldered away with
dust and moths. Let as many as will, read this little book, and then say
whether Theology is a new or an old thing among us; for this book is not new.
But if they say as before, that we are but German theologians, we will not deny
it. I thank God, that I have heard and found my God in the German tongue, as
neither I nor they have yet found Him in the Latin, Greek, or Hebrew tongue.
God grant that this book may be spread abroad, then we shall find that the
German theologians are without doubt the best theologians.
(Signed, without date,)
"Dr. MARTIN LUTHER,
AUGUSTINIAN of Wittemberg.
These words of Luther will probably be considered
to form a sufficient justification for an attempt to present the Theologia
Germanica in an English dress. When Luther sent it forth, its effort to
revive the consciousness of spiritual life was received with enthusiasm by his
fellow-countrymen, in whom that life was then breaking with volcanic energy
through the clods of formalism and hypocrisy, with which the Romish Church had
sought to stifle its fires. No fewer than seventeen editions of the work
appeared during the lifetime of Luther. Up to the present day, it has continued
to be a favourite handbook of devotion in Germany, where it has passed through
certainly as many as sixty Editions, and it has also been widely circulated in
France and the Netherlands, by means of Latin, French, and Flemish
translations.
To the question, who was the author of a book
which has exerted so great an influence? no answer can be given, all the
various endeavours to discover him having proved fruitless. Till within the
last few years, Luther was our sole authority for the text of the work, but,
about 1850, a manuscript of it was discovered at Wurtzburg, by Professor Reuss,
the librarian of the University there, which has since been published verbatim
by Professor Pfeiffer of Prague. This Manuscript dates from 1497; consequently
it is somewhat older than Luther's time, and it also contains some passages not
found in his editions. As, upon careful comparison, it seemed to the translator
indisputably superior to the best modern editions based upon Luther's, it has
been selected as the groundwork of the present translation, merely correcting
from the former, one or two passages which appeared to contain errors of the
press, or more likely of the transcriber's pen. The passages not found in
Luther's edition are here enclosed between brackets.
As has been stated, the author of the
Theologia Germanica is unknown; but it is evident from his whole
cast of thought, as well as from a Preface attached to the Wurtzburg
Manuscript, that he belonged to a class of men who sprang up in Southern
Germany at the beginning of the fourteenth century, and who were distinguished
for their earnest piety and their practical belief in the presence of the
Spirit of God with all Christians, laity as well as clergy.
These men had fallen upon evil times. Their age
was not indeed one of those periods in which the vigour of the nobler powers of
the soul is enfeebled by the abundance of material prosperity and physical
enjoyment, nor yet one of those in which they are utterly crushed out under the
hoof of oppression and misery; but it was an age in which conflicting elements
were wildly struggling for the mastery. The highest spiritual and temporal
authorities were at deadly strife with each other and among themselves; and in
their contests, there were few provinces or towns that did not repeatedly
suffer the horrors of war. The desolation caused by its ravages was however
speedily repaired during the intervals of peace, by the extraordinary energy
which the German nation displayed in that bloom of its manhood; so that times
of deep misery and great prosperity rapidly alternated with each other. But on
the whole, during the first half of this century, the sense of the calamities,
which were continually recurring, predominated over the recollection of the
calmer years, which were barely sufficient to allow breathing time between the
successive waves that threatened to overwhelm social order and happiness.
The unquestioning faith and honest enthusiasm
which had prompted the Crusades, no longer burnt with the same fierce ardour,
for the unhappy issue of those sacred enterprises, and the scandalous worldly
ambition of the heads of the Church, had moderated its fervour and saddened the
hearts of true believers. Yet the one Catholic, Christian creed still held an
undivided and very real sovereignty over men's minds, and the supremacy of the
Church in things spiritual was never questioned, though many were beginning to
feel that it was needful for the State to have an independent authority in
things temporal, and the question was warmly agitated how much of the spiritual
authority resided in the Pope and how much in the bishops and doctors of the
Church. But in whichever way the dispute between these rival claims might be
adjusted, the reverence for the office of the clergy remained
unimpaired. The case was very different with the reverence for their
persons, which had fallen to a very low ebb, owing to the worldliness
and immorality of their lives. This again was much encouraged by the conduct of
the Popes, who, in their zeal to establish worldly dominion, made
ecclesiastical appointments rather with a view to gain political adherents, or
to acquire wealth by the sale of benefices, than with a regard to the fitness
of the men selected, or the welfare of the people committed to their charge.
On the whole, it was an age of faith, though by
no means of a blind, unreasoning taking things for granted. On the contrary,
the evidences of extreme activity of mind meet us on every hand, in the
monuments of its literature, architecture, and invention. A few facts
strikingly illustrate the divergent tendencies of thought and public opinion.
Thus we may remember, how it was currently reported that the profligate Pope
Boniface VIII. was privately an unbeliever, even deriding the idea of the
immortality of the soul, at the very time when he was maintaining against
Philip the Fair, the right of the Pope to sit, as Christ's representative, in
judgment on the living and the dead, and to take the sword of temporal power
out of the hands of those who misused it.[3]
Whether this accusation was true or not, it is a remarkable sign of the times
that it should have been widely believed.
Some years later, and when the increased
corruptness of the clergy, after the removal of the Papal Court to Avignon,
provoked still louder complaints, we see the religious and patriotic Emperor,
Louis IV., accusing John XXII. of heresy, in a public assembly held in the
square of St. Peter's at Rome, and setting up another Pope "in order to please
the Roman people." But though the new Pope was every way fitted, by his
unblemished character and ascetic manners, to gain a hold on public esteem, we
see that the Emperor could not maintain him against the legitimately elected
Pope, who, from his seat at Avignon, had power to harass the Emperor so greatly
with his interdicts, that the latter, finding all efforts at conciliation
fruitless, would have bought peace by unconditional submission, had not the
Estates of the Empire refused to yield to such humiliation. Yet we find this
very Pope obliged to yield and retract his opinions on a point of dogmatic
theology. He had in a certain treatise propounded the opinion that the souls of
the pious would not be admitted to the immediate vision of the Deity until
after the day of judgment. The King of France, in 1333, called an assembly of
Prelates and theologians at his palace at Vincennes, where he invited them to
discuss before him the two questions, whether the souls of departed saints
would be admitted to an immediate vision of the Deity before the resurrection;
and whether, if so, their vision would be of the same or of a different kind
after the Judgment Day? The theological faculty having come to conclusions
differing in some respects from those of the Pope, the King threatened the
latter with the stake as a heretic, unless he retracted; and John XXII. issued
a bull, declaring that what he had said or written, ought only to be received
in so far as it agreed with the Catholic Faith, the Church and Holy Scripture.
No circumstance, perhaps, offers a more remarkable spectacle to us in its
contrast with the spirit of our own times. At the present moment, when the Pope
could not sit for a day in safety on his temporal throne without the defence of
French or Austrian bayonets, we can scarcely conceive an Emperor of France or
Austria taking upon himself to convene an assembly of Catholic theologians, and
the latter pronouncing a censure on the dogmas propounded by the Head of the
Church! It would be hard to say whether the Sovereigns of the present day would
be more amused by the absurdity of devoting their time to such discussions, or
the consciences of good Catholics more shocked at the presumption of such a
verdict.
Still it must not be forgotten that the
importance of religious affairs in that age must not be ascribed too
exclusively to earnestness about religion itself, for the ecclesiastical
interest predominated over the purely religious. The Pope and the Emperor
represented the two great antagonistic powers, spiritual and temporal, the
rivalry between which absorbed into itself all the political and social
questions that could then be agitated. The question of allegiance to the Pope
or the Emperor was like the contest between royalism and republicanism; the
Ghibelline called himself a patriot, and was called by his adversary, the
Guelf, a worldly man or even an infidel, while he retorted by calling the Guelf
a betrayer of his country, and an enemy of national liberties.
We cannot help seeing, however, that in those
days both princes and people, wicked as their lives often were, did really
believe in the Christian religion, and that while much of the mythological and
much of the formalistic element mingled in their zeal for outward observances,
there was also much thoroughly sincere enthusiasm among them. But both the two
great powers oppressed the people, which looked alternately to the one side or
the other for emancipation from the particular grievances felt to be most
galling at any given moment or place. In the frightful moral and physical
condition of society, it was no wonder that a despair of Providence should have
begun to attack some minds, which led to materialistic scepticism, while others
sought for help on the path of wild speculation. The latter appears to have
been the case with the Beghards or "Brothers and Sisters of the Free Spirit,"
who attempted to institute a reform by withdrawing the people altogether from
the influence of the clergy, but whose followers after a time too often fell
into the vices of the priests from whom they had separated themselves. In 1317,
we find the Bishop of Ochsenstein complaining that Alsace was filled with these
Beghards, who appear to have been a kind of antinomian pantheists, teaching
that the Spirit is bound by no law, and annihilating the distinction between
the Creator and the creature. Both in their excellences and defects they remind
us of the modern "German Catholics," and of some, too, of the recent Protestant
schools in Germany. There seems to have been no party of professed unbelievers,
but that some individuals were such in word as well as deed, appears from what
Ruysbroch of Brussels,[4] (1300-1330) says of
those "who live in mortal sin, not troubling themselves about God or His grace,
but thinking virtue sheer nonsense, and the spiritual life hypocrisy or
delusion; and hearing with disgust all mention of God or virtue, for they are
persuaded that there is no such thing as God, or Heaven, or Hell; for they
acknowledge nothing but what is palpable to the senses."
The early part of the fourteenth century saw
Germany divided for nine years between the rival claims of two Emperors,
Frederick of Austria, supported by Pope John XXII. and a faction in Germany,
and Louis of Bavaria, whose cause was espoused by a majority of the princes of
the Empire, as that of the defender of the dignity and independence of the
State, and the champion of reform within the Church. The death of Frederick, in
1322, left Louis the undisputed Emperor, as far as nearly all his subjects were
concerned, and he would fain have purchased peace with the Pope on any
reasonable terms, that he might apply himself to the internal improvement of
his dominions; but John XXII. was implacable, and continued to wage against him
and his adherents a deadly warfare, not closed until his successor Charles IV.
submitted to all the papal demands, and to every indignity imposed upon him.
One of the most fearful consequences of the
enmity between John XXII. and Louis of Bavaria, to the unfortunate subjects of
the latter, was the Interdict under which his dominions were laid in 1324, and
from which some places, distinguished for their loyalty to the Emperor, were
not relieved for six-and-twenty years. Louis, indeed, desired his subjects to
pay no regard to the bull of excommunication, and most of the laity, especially
of the larger towns, would gladly have obeyed him in spite of the Pope; but the
greater part of the bishops and clergy held with their spiritual head, and thus
the inhabitants of Strasburg, Nuremberg, and other cities, where the civil
authorities sided with the Emperor, and the clergy with the Pope, were left
year after year without any religious privileges; for public worship ceased,
and all the business of life went on without the benedictions of the Church, no
rite being allowed but baptism and extreme unction.
After this had lasted sixteen years, the Emperor,
wishing to relieve the anguished consciences of his people, issued, in
conjunction with the Princes of the Empire, a great manifesto to all
Christendom, refuting the Pope's accusations against him, maintaining that he
who had been legally chosen by the Electors was, in virtue thereof, the
rightful Emperor, and had received his dignity from God, and proclaiming that
all who denied this were guilty of high treason; that therefore none should be
allowed any longer to observe the Interdict, and all who should continue to do
so, whether communities or individuals, should be deprived of every civil and
ecclesiastical right and privilege. This courageous edict found a response in
the heart of the nation, and public opinion continually declared itself more
strongly on the side of the Emperor. Yet on the whole it rather increased the
general anarchy; for in many places the priests and monks were steadfast in
their allegiance to the Pope, and, refusing to administer public service, were
altogether banished from the towns, and the churches and convents closed. In
Strasburg, for instance, where the regular clergy had long since ceased to
perform religious rites, the Dominicans and Franciscans had continued to preach
and perform mass; but now they too, frightened by the Edict, which placed them
in direct opposition to the Pope, dared no longer to disregard the renewed
sentence of excommunication hanging over them, and refusing to read mass, were
expelled by the Town Council. Many of these banished clergy wandered about in
great distress, with difficulty finding refuge among the scattered rural
population, and the sufferings they endured proved the sincerity of their
conscientious scruples. Some few, either from worldly motives, or out of pity
for the people, remained at their posts. The former indeed throve by the
miseries of their fellow-creatures, driving a usurious trade in the famine of
spiritual consolation; for it is upon record, that in time of pestilence, the
price of shrift has been as much as sixty florins!
The spectacle of such discord between the clergy
and the laity was something unspeakably shocking to the Christian world in that
age, and the energetic proceedings of the magistracy must have utterly
staggered the faith of many. Of all the events that were stirring up men's
passions and energies, none was more calculated to move their souls to the very
centre, than to find themselves compelled to stand up in arms against those
whom they had been wont to bow down before, and to reverence as the source of
those spiritual blessings, for the sake of which they were now driven in
desperation to take this awful step.
To these political and religious dissensions were
added, in process of time, other miseries. After it had been preceded by
earthquakes, hurricanes and famine, the Black Death broke out, spreading terror
and desolation through Southern Europe. Men saw in these frightful calamities
the judgments of God, but looked in vain for any to show them a way of
deliverance and escape. Some believed that the last day was approaching; some,
remembering an old prophecy, looked with hope for the return of the Great
Emperor Frederick II. to restore justice and peace in the world, to punish the
wicked clergy, and help the poor and oppressed flock to their rights. Others
traversed the country in processions, scourging themselves and praying with a
loud voice, in order to atone for their sins and appease God's anger, and
inveighing against man's unbelief, which had called down God's wrath upon the
earth; while some thought to do God service, by wreaking vengeance on the
people which had slain the Lord, and thousands of wretched Jews perished in the
flames kindled by frantic terror. "All things worked together to deepen the
sense of the corruptness of the Church, to lead men's thoughts onwards from
their physical to their spiritual wants, to awaken reflection on the judgments
of God, and to fix their eyes on the indications of the future,''[5] so that John of Winterthur was probably not alone in
applying to his own times what St. Paul says of the perils of the latter
days.
In these chaotic times, and in the countries
where the storms raged most fiercely, there were some who sought that peace
which could not be found on earth, in intercourse with a higher world.
Destitute of help and comfort and guidance from man, they took refuge in God,
and finding that to them He had proved "a present help ill time of trouble,"
"as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land," they tried to bring their
fellow-men to believe and partake in a life raised above the troubles of this
world. They desired to show them that that Eternal life and enduring peace
which Christ had promised to His disciples, was, of a truth, to be found by the
Way which He had pointed out, -- by a living union with Him and the Father who
had sent Him.
With this aim, like-minded men and women joined
themselves together, that by communion of heart and mutual counsel they might
strengthen each other in their common efforts to revive the spiritual life of
those around them. The Association they founded was kept secret, lest through
misconception of their principles, they might fall under suspicion of heresy,
and the Inquisition should put a stop to their labours; but they desired to
keep themselves aloof from every thing that savoured of heresy or disorder. On
the contrary, they carefully observed all the precepts of the Church, and
carried their obedience so far that many of their number were among the priests
who were banished for obeying the Pope, when the Emperor ordered them to
disregard the Interdict. They assumed the appellation of "Friends of God"
(Gottesfreunde), and, in the course of a few years, their associations
extended along the Rhine provinces from Basle to Cologne, and eastwards through
Swabia, Bavaria, and Franconia. Strasburg, Constance, Nuremberg and Nordlingen
were among their chief seats. Their distinguishing doctrines were
self-renunciation, -- the complete giving-up of self-will to the will of God;
-- the continuous activity of the Spirit of God in all believers, and the
intimate union possible between God and man; -- the worthlessness of all
religion based upon fear or the hope of reward; -- and the essential equality
of the laity and clergy, though, for the sake of order and discipline, the
organization of the Church was necessary. They often appealed to the
declaration of Christ (John 15:15), "Henceforth I call you not servants; for
the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth; but I have called you friends; for
all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you;" and from
this they probably derived their name of "Friends of God." Their mode of action
was simply personal, for they made no attempt to gain political and
hierarchical power, but exerted all their influence by means of preaching,
writing and social intercourse. The Association counted among its members
priests, monks, and laity, without distinction of rank or sex. Its leaders
stood likewise in close connection with several convents, especially those of
Engenthal, and Maria-Medingen near Nuremberg, presided over by the sisters
Christina and Margaret Ebner, much of whose correspondence is still extant.
Agnes, the widow of King Andrew of Hungary, and various knights and burghers,
are also named as belonging to it.
Foremost among the leaders of this party should
be mentioned the celebrated Tauler, a Dominican monk of Strasburg, who spent
his life in preaching and teaching up and down the country from Strasburg to
Cologne, and whose influence is to this day active among his countrymen by
means of his admirable sermons, which are still widely read. At the time of the
Interdict he wrote a noble appeal to the clergy not to forsake their flocks,
maintaining that if the Emperor had sinned, the blame lay with him only, not
with his wretched subjects, so that it was a crying shame to visit his guilt
upon the innocent people, but that their unjust oppression would be recompensed
to them by God hereafter. He acted up to his own principles, and when the Black
Death was raging in Strasburg, where it carried off 16,000 victims, he was
unwearied in his efforts to administer aid and consolation to the sick and
dying.
Much of Tauler's religious fervour and light he
himself attributed to the instructions of a layman, his friend. It is now known
from contemporary records that this was Nicholas of Basle, a citizen of that
Free town and a secret Waldensian. Little is known of his life beyond the fact
that he was intimately connected with many of the heads of this party, and was
resorted to by them for guidance and help; for, being under suspicion of
heresy, he had to conceal all his movements from the Inquisition. He succeeded,
however, in carrying on his labours and eluding his enemies, until he reached
an advanced age; but at length, venturing alone and unprotected into France, he
was taken, and burnt at Vienne in 1382. Another friend of Tauler's, and like
him an eloquent and powerful preacher, whose sermons are still read with
delight, was Henry Suso, a Dominican monk, belonging to a knightly family in
Swabia.
One of the leaders of the "Friends of God,"
Nicholas of Strasburg, was in 1326 appointed by John XXII. nuncio, with the
oversight of the Dominican order throughout Germany, and dedicated to that Pope
an Essay of great learning and ability, refuting the prevalent interpretations
of Scripture, which referred the coming of Antichrist and the Judgment day to
the immediate future. Thus we see that the "Friends of God" were not confined
to one political party, and this likewise appears from the history of another
celebrated member of this sect, Henry of Nordlingen, a priest of Constance,
who, like Suso, was banished for his adherence to the Pope. One of the most
remarkable men of this sect was a layman and married, Rulman Merswin, belonging
to a high family at Strasburg. He appears to have been led to a religious life
by the influence of Tauler, who was his confessor. He is the author of several
mystical works which, he says, he wrote "to do good to his fellow creatures,"
but he contributed perhaps still more largely to their benefit by his activity
in charitable works, for he established one hospital and seems to have had the
oversight of others also. He likewise gave largely to churches and convents,
but is best known by having founded a house for the Knights of St. John in
Strasburg. The characteristic doctrines of the "Friends of God" have already
been indicated. That they should not have fallen into some exaggerations was
scarcely possible, but where they have done so, it may generally be traced to
the influence of the monastic life to which most of them were dedicated, and to
the perplexities of their age.
The book before us was probably written somewhere
about I350, since it refers to Tauler as already well known. It was the
practice of the "Friends of God" to conceal their names as much as possible
when they wrote, lest a desire for fame should mingle with their endeavours to
be useful. This is probably the reason why we have no indication of its
authorship beyond a preface, which the Wurtzburg Manuscript possesses in common
with that which was in Luther's hands, and from which it appears that the
writer "was of the Teutonic order, a priest and a warden in the house of the
Teutonic order in Frankfort." A translation of this Preface is prefixed to the
present volume. Till the discovery of the Wurtzburg Manuscript, it was supposed
that this Preface was from Luther's hand, who merely embodied in it the
tradition which he had received from some source unknown to us; and hence,
some, disregarding its authority, have ascribed the Theologia Germanica
to Tauler, whose style it resembles so much that it might be taken for his
work, but for the reference to him already mentioned. Since, however, the
antiquity of the Preface is now proved, we must be content with the information
which it affords us, unless any further discoveries among old manuscripts
should throw fresh light upon the subject.
Should this attempt to introduce the writings of
the "Friends of God" in England awaken an interest in them and their works, the
Translator proposes to follow up the present volume with an account of Tauler
and selections from his writings; believing that the study of these German
theologians, who were already called old in Luther's age, would furnish the
best antidote to what of mischief English readers may have derived from German
theology, falsely so called.
Manchester, February 1854.
MY DEAR FRIEND,
YOUR Letter and the proof-sheets of your Translation of the Theologia
Germanica, with Kingsley's Preface and your Introduction, were delivered to
me yesterday, as I was leaving Carlton Terrace to breathe once more, for a few
days, the refreshing air of this quiet, lovely place. You told me, at the time,
that you had been led to study Tauler and the Theologia Germanica by
some conversations which we had on their subjects in 1851, and you now wish me
to state to your readers, in a few lines, what place I conceive this school of
Germanic theology to hold in the general development of Christian thought, and
what appears to me to be the bearing of this work in particular upon the
present dangers and prospects of Christianity, as well as upon the eternal
interests of religion in the heart of every man and
woman.
In complying willingly with your
request, I may begin by saying that, with Luther, I rank this short treatise
next to the Bible, but, unlike him, should place it before rather than after
St. Augustine. That school of pious, learned, and profound men of which this
book is, as it were, the popular catechism, was the Germanic counterpart of
Romanic scholasticism, and more than the revival of that Latin theology which
produced so many eminent thinkers, from Augustine, its father, to Thomas
Aquinas, its last great genius, whose death did not take place until after the
birth of Dante, who again was the contemporary of the Socrates of the Rhenish
school, -- Meister Eckart, the Dominican.
The theology of this school was the first protest
of the Germanic mind against the Judaism and formalism of the Byzantine and
mediaeval Churches, -- the hollowness of science to which scholasticism had
led, and the rottenness of society which a pompous hierarchy strove in vain to
conceal, but had not the power nor the will to correct. Eckart and Tauler, his
pupil, brought religion home from fruitless speculation, and reasonings upon
imaginary or impossible suppositions, to man's own heart and to the
understanding of the common people, as Socrates did the Greek philosophy. There
is both a remarkable analogy and a striking contrast between the great Athenian
and those Dominican friars. Socrates did full justice to the deep ethical ideas
embodied in the established religion of his country and its venerated
mysteries, which he far preferred to the shallow philosophy of the sophists;
but he dissuaded his pupils from seeking an initiation into the mysteries, or
at least from resting their convictions and hopes upon them, exhorting them to
rely, not upon the oracles of Delphi, but upon the oracle in their own bosom.
The "Friends of God," on the other hand, believing (like Dante) most profoundly
in the truth of the Christian religion, on which the established Church of
their age, notwithstanding its corruptions, was essentially founded,
recommended submission to the ordinances of the church as a wholesome
preparatory discipline for many minds. Like the saint of Athens, however, they
spoke plain truth to the people. To their disciples, and those who came to them
for instruction, they exhibited the whole depth of that real Christian
philosophy, which opens to the mind after all scholastic conventionalism has
been thrown away, and the soul listens to the response which Christ's Gospel
and God's creation find in a sincere heart and a self-sacrificing life; -- a
philosophy which, considered merely as a speculation, is far more profound than
any scholastic system. But, in a style that was intelligible to all, they
preached that no fulfilment of rites and ceremonies, nor of so-called religious
duties, -- in fact, no outward works, however meritorious, can either give
peace to man's conscience, nor yet give him strength to bear up against the
temptations of prosperity and the trials of adversity.
In following this course they brought the people
back from hollow profession and real despair, to the blessings of gospel
religion, while they opened to philosophic minds a new career of thought. By
teaching that man is justified by ' faith, and by faith alone, they prepared
the popular intellectual element of the Reformation; by teaching that this
faith has its philosophy, as fully able to carry conviction to the
understanding, as faith is to give peace to the troubled conscience, they paved
the way for that spiritual philosophy of the mind, of which Kant laid the
foundation. But they were not controversialists, as the Reformers of the
sixteenth century were driven to be by their position, and not men of science
exclusively, as the masters of modern philosophy in Germany were and are.
Although most of them friars, or laymen connected with the religious orders of
the time, they were men of the people and men of action. They preached the
saving faith to the people in churches, in hospitals, in the streets and public
places. In the strength of this faith, Tauler, when he had been already for
years the universal object of admiration as a theologian and preacher through
all the free cities on the Rhine, from Basle to Cologne, humbled himself, and
remained silent for the space of two years, after the mysterious layman had
shown him the insufficiency of his scholastic learning and preaching. In the
strength of this faith, he braved the Pope's Interdict, and gave the
consolations of religion to the people of Strasburg, during the dreadful plague
which depopulated that flourishing city. For this faith, Eckart suffered with
patience slander and persecution, as formerly he had borne with meekness,
honours and praise. For this faith, Nicolaus of Basle, who sat down as a humble
stranger at Tauler's feet to become the instrument of his real enlightenment,
died a martyr in the flames. In this sense, the "Friends of God" were, like the
Apostles, men of the people and practical Christians, while as men of thought,
their ideas contributed powerfully to the great efforts of the European nations
in the sixteenth century.
Let me, therefore, my dear friend, lay aside all
philosophical and theological terms, and state the principle of the golden book
which you are just presenting to the English public, in what I consider, with
Luther, the best Theological exponent, in plain Teutonic, thus: --
Sin is
selfishness:
Godliness is unselfishness:
A godly life is the steadfast working out of inward freeness from self:
To become thus Godlike is the bringing back of man's first
nature.
On this last point, -- man's divine dignity and
destiny, -- Tauler speaks as strongly as our author, and almost as strongly as
the Bible. Man is indeed to him God's own image. "As a sculptor," he says
somewhere, with a striking range of mind for a monk of the fourteenth century,
"is said to have exclaimed indignantly on seeing a rude block of marble, 'what
a godlike beauty thou hidest!' thus God looks upon man in whom God's own image
is hidden." "We may begin," he says in a kindred passage, "by loving God in
hope of reward, we may express ourselves concerning Him in symbols (Bilder),
but we must throw them all away, and much more we must scorn all idea of
reward, that we may love God only because He is the Supreme Good, and
contemplate His eternal nature as the real substance of our own soul."
But let no one imagine that these men, although
doomed to passiveness in many respects, thought a contemplative or monkish life
a condition of spiritual Christianity, and not rather a danger to it. "If a man
truly loves God," says Tauler, "and has no will but to do God's will, the whole
force of the river Rhine may run at him and will not disturb him or break his
peace; if we find outward things a danger and disturbance, it comes from our
appropriating to ourselves what is God's." But Tauler, as well as our Author,
uses the strongest language to express his horror of Sin, man's own creation,
and their view on this subject forms their great contrast to the philosophers
of the Spinozistic school. Among the Reformers, Luther stands nearest to them,
with respect to the great fundamental points of theological teaching, but their
intense dread of Sin as a rebellion against God, is shared both by Luther and
Calvin. Among later theologians, Julius Muller, in his profound Essay on Sin,
and Richard Rothe, in his great work on Christian Ethics, come nearest to them
in depth of thought and ethical earnestness, and the first of these eminent
writers carries out, as it appears to me, most consistently that fundamental
truth of the Theologia Germanica that there is no sin but Selfishness,
and that all Selfishness is sin.
Such appear to me to be the characteristics of
our book and of Tauler. I may be allowed to add, that this small but golden
Treatise has been now for almost forty years an unspeakable comfort to me and
to many Christian friends (most of whom have already departed in peace), to
whom I had the happiness of introducing it. May it in your admirably faithful
and lucid translation become a real "book for the million" in England, a
privilege which it already shares in Germany with Tauler's matchless Sermons,
of which I rejoice to hear that you are making a selection for publication. May
it become a blessing to many a longing Christian heart in that dear country of
yours, which I am on the point of leaving, after many happy years of residence,
but on which I can never look as a strange land to me, any more than I shall
ever consider myself as a stranger in that home of old Teutonic liberty and
energy, which I have found to be also the home of practical Christianity and of
warm and faithful affection.
Bunsen.
Of that which is perfect and that which is in part, and how that which is in part is done away, when that which is perfect is come.St. Paul saith, "When that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away."[6] Now mark what is "that which is perfect," and "that which is in part."
Of what Sin is, and how we must not take unto ourselves any good Thing, seeing that it belongeth unto the true Good alone.The Scripture and the Faith and the Truth say, Sin is nought else, but that the creature turneth away from the unchangeable Good and betaketh itself to the changeable; that is to say, that it turneth away from the Perfect to "that which is in part" and imperfect, and most often to itself. Now mark: when the creature claimeth for its own anything good, such as Substance, Life, Knowledge, Power, and in short whatever we should call good, as if it were that, or possessed that, or that were itself, or that proceeded from it, -- as often as this cometh to pass, the creature goeth astray. What did the devil do else, or what was his going astray and his fall else, but that he claimed for himself to be also somewhat, and would have it that somewhat was his, and somewhat was due to him? This setting up of a claim and his I and Me and Mine, these were his going astray, and his fall. And thus it is to this day.
How Man's Fall and going astray must be amended as Adam's Fall was.What else did Adam do but this same thing? It is said, it was because Adam ate the apple that he was lost, or fell. I say, it was because of his claiming something for his own, and because of his I, Mine, Me, and the like. Had he eaten seven apples, and yet never claimed anything for his own, he would not have fallen: but as soon as he called something his own, he fell, and would have fallen if he had never touched an apple. Behold! I have fallen a hundred times more often and deeply, and gone a hundred times farther astray than Adam; and not all mankind could mend his fall, or bring him back from going astray. But how shall my fall be amended? It must be healed as Adam's fall was healed, and on the self-same wise. By whom, and on what wise was that healing brought to pass? Mark this: man could not without God, and God should not without man. Wherefore God took human nature or manhood upon Himself and was made man, and man was made divine. Thus the healing was brought to pass. So also must my fall be healed. I cannot do the work without God, and God may not or will not without me; for if it shall be accomplished, in me, too, God must be made man; in such sort that God must take to Himself all that is in me, within and without, so that there may be nothing in me which striveth against God or hindereth His Work. Now if God took to Himself all men that are in the world, or ever were, and were made man in them, and they were made divine in Him, and this work were not fulfilled in me, my fall and my wandering would never be amended except it were fulfilled in me also. And in this bringing back and healing, I can, or may, or shall do nothing of myself, but just simply yield to God, so that He alone may do all things in me and work, and I may suffer Him and all His work and His divine will. And because I will not do so, but I count myself to be my own, and say "I," "Mine," "Me" and the like, God is hindered, so that He cannot do His work in me alone and without hindrance; for this cause my fall and my going astray remain unhealed. Behold! this all cometh of my claiming somewhat for my own.
How Man, when he claimeth any good Thing for his own, falleth, and toucheth God in His Honour.God saith, "I will not give My glory to another."[7] This is as much as to say, that praise and honour and glory belong to none but to God only. But now, if I call any good thing my own, as if I were it, or of myself had power or did or knew anything, or as if anything were mine or of me, or belonged to me, or were due to me or the like, I take unto myself somewhat of honour and glory, and do two evil things: First, I fall and go astray as aforesaid: Secondly, I touch God in His honour and take unto myself what belongeth to God only. For all that must be called good belongeth to none but to the true eternal Goodness which is God only, and whoso taketh it unto himself, committeth unrighteousness and is against God.
How we are to take that Saying, that we must come to be without Will, Wisdom, Love, Desire, Knowledge, and the like.Certain men say that we ought to be without will, wisdom, love, desire, knowledge, and the like. Hereby is not to be understood that there is to be no knowledge in man, and that God is not to be loved by him, nor desired and longed for, nor praised and honoured; for that were a great loss, and man were like the beasts and as the brutes that have no reason. But it meaneth that man's knowledge should be so clear and perfect that he should acknowledge of a truth that in himself he neither hath nor can do any good thing, and that none of his knowledge, wisdom and art, his will, love and good works do come from himself, nor are of man, nor of any creature, but that all these are of the eternal God, from whom they all proceed. As Christ Himself saith, "Without Me, ye can do nothing."[8] St. Paul saith also, "What hast thou that thou hast not received?"[9] As much as to say -- nothing. "Now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received it?" Again he saith, "Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think anything as of ourselves, but our sufficiency is of God."[10] Now when a man duly perceiveth these things in himself, he and the creature fall behind, and he doth not call anything his own, and the less he taketh this knowledge unto himself, the more perfect doth it become. So also is it with the will, and love and desire, and the like. For the less we call these things our own, the more perfect and noble and Godlike do they become, and the more we think them our own, the baser and less pure and perfect do they become.
How that which is best and noblest should also be loved above all Things by us, merely because it is the best.A Master called Boetius saith, "It is of sin that we do not love that which is Best." He hath spoken the truth. That which is best should be the dearest of all things to us; and in our love of it, neither helpfulness nor unhelpfulness, advantage nor injury, gain nor loss, honour nor dishonour, praise nor blame, nor anything of the kind should be regarded; but what is in truth the noblest and best of all things, should be also the dearest of all things, and that for no other cause than that it is the noblest and best.
Of the Eyes of the Spirit wherewith Man looketh into Eternity and into Time, and how the one is hindered of the other in its Working.Let us remember how it is written and said that the soul of Christ had two eyes, a right and a left eye. In the beginning, when the soul of Christ was created, she fixed her right eye upon eternity and the Godhead, and remained in the full intuition and enjoyment of the divine Essence and Eternal Perfection; and continued thus unmoved and undisturbed by all the accidents and travail, suffering, torment and pain that ever befell the outward man. But with the left eye she beheld the creature and perceived all things therein, and took note of the difference between the creatures, which were better or worse, nobler or meaner; and thereafter was the outward man of Christ ordered.
How the Soul of Man, while it is yet in the Body, may obtain a Foretaste of eternal Blessedness.It hath been asked whether it be possible for the soul, while it is yet in the body, to reach so high as to cast a glance into eternity, and receive a foretaste of eternal life and eternal blessedness. This is commonly denied; and truly so in a sense. For it indeed cannot be so long as the soul is taking heed to the body, and the things which minister and appertain thereto, and to time and the creature, and is disturbed and troubled and distracted thereby. For if the soul shall rise to such a state, she must be quite pure, wholly stripped and bare of all images, and be entirely separate from all creatures, and above all from herself. Now many think this is not to be done and is impossible in this present time. But St. Dionysius maintains that it is possible, as we find from his words in his Epistle to Timothy, where he saith: "For the beholding of the hidden things of God, shalt thou forsake sense and the things of the flesh, and all that the senses can apprehend, and all that reason of her own powers can bring forth, and all things created and uncreated that reason is able to comprehend and know, and shalt take thy stand upon an utter abandonment of thyself, and as knowing none of the aforesaid things, and enter into union with Him who is, and who is above all existence and all knowledge." Now if he did not hold this to be possible in this present time, why should he teach it and enjoin it on us in this present time? But it behoveth you to know that a master hath said on this passage of St. Dionysius, that it is possible, and may happen to a man often, till he become so accustomed to it, as to be able to look into eternity whenever he will. For when a thing is at first very hard to a man and strange, and seemingly quite impossible, if he put all his strength and energy into it, and persevere therein, that will afterward grow quite light and easy, which he at first thought quite out of reach, seeing that it is of no use to begin any work, unless it may be brought to a good end.
How it is better and more profitable for a Man that he should perceive what God will do with him, or to what end He will make Use of him, than if he knew all that Gad had ever wrought, or would ever work through all the Creatures; and how Blessedness lieth alone in God, and not in the Creatures, or in any Works.We should mark and know of a very truth that all manner of virtue and goodness, and even that Eternal Good which is God Himself, can never make a man virtuous, good, or happy, so long as it is outside the soul; that is, so long as the man is holding converse with outward things through his senses and reason, and doth not withdraw into himself and learn to understand his own life, who and what he is. The like is true of sin and evil. For all manner of sin and wickedness can never make us evil, so long as it is outside of us; that is, so long as we do not commit it, or do not give consent to it.
How the perfect Men have no other Desire than that they may be to the Eternal Goodness what His Hand is to a Man, and how they have lost the Fear of Hell, and Hope of Heaven.Now let us mark: Where men are enlightened with the true light, they perceive that all which they might desire or choose, is nothing to that which all creatures, as creatures, ever desired or chose or knew, Therefore they renounce all desire and choice, and commit and commend themselves and all things to the Eternal Goodness. Nevertheless, there remaineth in them a desire to go forward and get nearer to the Eternal Goodness; that is, to come to a clearer knowledge, and warmer love, and more comfortable assurance, and perfect obedience and subjection; so that every enlightened man could say: "I would fain be to the Eternal Goodness, what His own hand is to a man." And he feareth always that he is not enough so, and longeth for the salvation of all men. And such men do not call this longing their own, nor take it unto themselves, for they know well that this desire is not of man, but of the Eternal Goodness; for whatsoever is good shall no one take unto himself as his own, seeing that it belongeth to the Eternal Goodness, only.
How a righteous Man in this present Time is brought into hell, and there cannot be comforted, and how he is taken out of Hell and carried into Heaven, and there cannot be troubled.Christ's soul must needs descend into hell, before it ascended into heaven. So must also the soul of man. But mark ye in what manner this cometh to pass. When a man truly Perceiveth and considereth himself, who and what he is, and findeth himself utterly vile and wicked, and unworthy of all the comfort and kindness that he hath ever received from God, or from the creatures, he falleth into such a deep abasement and despising of himself, that he thinketh himself unworthy that the earth should bear him, and it seemeth to him reasonable that all creatures in heaven and earth should rise up against him and avenge their Creator on him, and should punish and torment him; and that he were unworthy even of that. And it seemeth to him that he shall be eternally lost and damned, and a footstool to all the devils in hell, and that this is right and just and all too little compared to his sins which he so often and in so many ways hath committed against God his Creator. And therefore also he will not and dare not desire any consolation or release, either from God or from any creature that is in heaven or on earth; but he is willing to be unconsoled and unreleased, and he doth not grieve over his condemnation and sufferings; for they are right and just, and not contrary to God, but according to the will of God. Therefore they are right in his eyes, and he hath nothing to say against them. Nothing grieveth him but his own guilt and wickedness; for that is not right and is contrary to God, and for that cause he is grieved and troubled in spirit.
For this hell
shall pass away,
But Heaven shall endure for aye.
Also let a man
mark, when he is in this hell, nothing may console him; and he cannot believe
that he shall ever be released or comforted. But when he is in heaven, nothing
can trouble him; he believeth also that none will ever be able to offend or
trouble him, albeit it is indeed true, that after this hell he may be comforted
and released, and after this heaven he may be troubled and left without
consolation.
Again: this hell and this heaven come about a
man in such sort, that he knoweth not whence they come; and whether they come
to him, or depart from him, he can of himself do nothing towards it. Of these
things he can neither give nor take away from himself, bring them nor banish
them, but as it is written, "The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou
hearest the sound thereof," that is to say, at this time present, "but thou
knowest not whence it cometh, nor whither it goeth."[12] And when a man is in one of these two states, all is
right with him, and he is as safe in hell as in heaven, and so long as a man is
on earth, it is possible for him to pass ofttimes from the one into the other;
nay even within the space of a day and night, and all without his own doing.
But when the man is in neither of these two states he holdeth converse with the
creature, and wavereth hither and thither, and knoweth not what manner of man
he is. Therefore he shall never forget either of them, but lay up the
remembrance of them in his heart.
Touching that true inward Peace, which Christ left to His Disciples at the last.Many say they have no peace nor rest, but so many crosses and trials, afflictions and sorrows, that they know not how they shall ever get through them. Now he who in truth will perceive and take note, perceiveth clearly, that true peace and rest lie not in outward things; for if it were so, the Evil Spirit also would have peace when things go according to his will which is nowise the case; for the prophet declareth, "There is no peace, saith my God, to the wicked."[13] And therefore we must consider and see what is that peace which Christ left to His disciples at the last, when He said: "My peace I leave with you, My peace I give unto you."[14] We may perceive that in these words Christ did not mean a bodily and outward peace; for His beloved disciples, with all His friends and followers, have ever suffered, from the beginning, great affliction, persecution, nay, often martyrdom, as Christ Himself said: "In this world ye shall have tribulation."[15] But Christ meant that true, inward peace of the heart, which beginneth here, and endureth for ever hereafter. Therefore He said: "Not as the world giveth," for the world is false, and deceiveth in her gifts. She promiseth much, and performeth little. Moreover there liveth no man on earth who may always have rest and peace without troubles and crosses, with whom things always go according to his will; there is always something to be suffered here, turn which way you will. And as soon as you are quit of one assault, perhaps two come in its place. Wherefore yield thyself willingly to them, and seek only that true peace of the heart, which none can take away from thee, that thou mayest overcome all assaults.
How a Man may cast aside Images too soon.Tauler saith: "There be some men at the present time, who take leave of types and symbols too soon, before they have drawn out all the truth and instruction contained therein." Hence they are scarcely or perhaps never able to understand the truth aright.[16] For such men will follow no one, and lean unto their own understandings, and desire to fly before they are fledged. They would fain mount up to heaven in one flight; albeit Christ did not so, for after His resurrection, He remained full forty days with His beloved disciples. No one can be made perfect in a day. A man must begin by denying himself, and willingly forsaking all things for God's sake, and must give up his own will, and all his natural inclinations, and separate and cleanse himself thoroughly from all sins and evil ways. After this, let him humbly take up the cross and follow Christ. Also let him take and receive example and instruction, reproof, counsel and teaching from devout and perfect servants of God, and not follow his own guidance. Thus the work shall be established and come to a good end. And when a man hath thus broken loose from and outleaped all temporal things and creatures, he may afterwards become perfect in a life of contemplation. For he who will have the one must let the other go. There is no other way.
Of three Stages by which a Man is led upwards till he attaineth true Perfection.Now be assured that no one can be enlightened unless he be first cleansed or purified and stripped. So also, no one can be united with God unless he be first enlightened. Thus there are three stages: first, the purification; secondly, the enlightening; thirdly, the union. The purification concerneth those who are beginning or repenting, and is brought to pass in a threefold wise; by contrition and sorrow for sin, by full confession, by hearty amendment. The enlightening belongeth to such as are growing, and also taketh place in three ways: to wit, by the eschewal of sin, by the practice of virtue and good works, and by the willing endurance of all manner of temptation and trials. The union belongeth to such as are perfect, and also is brought to pass in three ways: to wit, by pureness and singleness of heart, by love, and by the contemplation of God, the Creator of all things.
How all Men are dead in Adam and are made alive again in Christ, and of true Obedience and Disobedience.All that in Adam fell and died, was raised again and made alive in Christ, and all that rose up and was made alive in Adam, fell and died in Christ. But what was that? I answer, true obedience and disobedience. But what is true obedience? I answer, that a man should so stand free, being quit of himself, that is, of his I, and Me, and Self, and Mine, and the like, that in all things, he should no more seek or regard himself, than if he did not exist, and should take as little account of himself as if he were not, and another had done all his works. Likewise he should count all the creatures for nothing. What is there then, which is, and which we may count for somewhat? I answer, nothing but that which we may call God. Behold! this is very obedience in the truth, and thus it will be in a blessed eternity. There nothing is sought nor thought of, nor loved, but the one thing only.
Telleth us what is the old Man, and what is the new Man.Again, when we read of the old man and the new man we must mark what that meaneth. The old man is Adam and disobedience, the Self, the Me, and so forth. But the new man is Christ and true obedience, a giving up and denying oneself of all temporal things, and seeking the honour of God alone in all things. And when dying and perishing and the like are spoken of, it meaneth that the old man should be destroyed, and not seek its own either in spiritual or in natural things. For where this is brought about in a true divine light, there the new man is born again. In like manner, it hath been said that man should die unto himself, that is, to earthly pleasures, consolations, joys, appetites, the I, the Self, and all that is thereof in man, to which he clingeth and on which he is yet leaning with content, and thinketh much of. Whether it be the man himself, or any other creature, whatever it be, it must depart and die, if the man is to be brought aright to another mind, according to the truth.
How we are not to take unto ourselves what we have done well: but only what we have done amiss.Behold! now it is reported there be some who vainly think and say that they are so wholly dead to self and quit of it, as to have reached and abide in a state where they suffer nothing and are moved by nothing, just as if all men were living in obedience, or as if there were no creatures. And thus they profess to continue always in an even temper of mind, so that nothing cometh amiss to them, howsoever things fall out, well or ill. Nay verily! the matter standeth not so, but as we have said. It might be thus, if all men were brought into obedience; but until then, it cannot be.
How that the Life of Christ is the noblest and best Life that ever hath been or can be, and how a careless Life of false Freedom is the worst Life that can be.Of a truth we ought to know and believe that there is no life so noble and good and well pleasing to God, as the life of Christ, and yet it is to nature and selfishness the bitterest life. A life of carelessness and freedom is to nature and the Self and the Me, the sweetest and pleasantest life, but it is not the best; and in some men may become the worst. But though Christ's life be the most bitter of all, yet it is to be preferred above all. Hereby shall ye mark this: There is an inward sight which hath power to perceive the One true Good, and that it is neither this nor that, but that of which St. Paul saith; "When that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away."[22] By this he meaneth, that the Whole and Perfect excelleth all the fragments, and that all which is in part and imperfect, is as nought compared to the Perfect. Thus likewise all knowledge of the parts is swallowed up when the Whole is known; and where that Good is known, it cannot but be longed for and loved so greatly, that all other love wherewith the man hath loved himself and other things, fadeth away. And that inward sight likewise perceiveth what is best and noblest in all things, and loveth it in the one true Good, and only for the sake of that true Good.
How we cannot come to the true Light and Christ's Life, by much Questioning or Reading, or by high natural Skill and Reason, but by truly renouncing ourselves and all Things.Let no one suppose, that we may attain to this true light and perfect knowledge, or life of Christ, by much questioning, or by hearsay, or by reading and study, nor yet by high skill and great learning. Yea, so long as a man taketh account of anything which is this or that, whether it be himself, or any other creature; or doeth anything, or frameth a purpose, for the sake of his own likings or desires, or opinions, or ends, he cometh not unto the life of Christ. This hath Christ Himself declared, for He saith: "If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me."[23] "He that taketh not his cross, and followeth after Me, is not worthy of Me."[24] And if he "hate not his father and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple."[25] He meaneth it thus: "He who doth not forsake and part with everything, can never know My eternal truth, nor attain unto My life." And though this had never been declared unto us, yet the truth herself sayeth it, for it is so of a truth. But so long as a man clingeth unto the elements and fragments of this world (and above all to himself), and holdeth converse with them, and maketh great account of them, he is deceived and blinded, and perceiveth what is good no further than as it is most convenient and pleasant to himself and profitable to his own ends. These he holdeth to be the highest good and loveth above all. Thus he never cometh to the truth.
How, seeing that the Life of Christ is most bitter to Nature and Self, Nature will have none of it, and chooseth a false careless Life, as is most convenient to her.Now, since the life of Christ is every way most bitter to nature and the Self and the Me (for in the true life of Christ, the Self and the Me and nature must be forsaken and lost, and die altogether), therefore, in each of us, nature hath a horror of it, and thinketh it evil and unjust and a folly, and graspeth after such a life as shall be most comfortable and pleasant to herself, and saith, and believeth also in her blindness, that such a life is the best possible. Now, nothing is so comfortable and pleasant to nature, as a free, careless way of life, therefore she clingeth to that, and taketh enjoyment in herself and her own powers, and looketh only to her own peace and comfort and the like. And this happeneth most of all, where there are high natural gifts of reason, for that soareth upwards in its own light and by its own power, till at last it cometh to think itself the true Eternal Light, and giveth itself out as such, and is thus deceived in itself, and deceiveth other people along with it, who know no better, and also are thereunto inclined.
How a friend of Christ willingly fulfilleth by his outward Works, such Things as must be and ought to be, and doth not concern himself with the rest.Now, it may be asked, what is the state of a man who followeth the true Light to the utmost of his power? I answer truly, it will never be declared aright, for he who is not such a man, can neither understand nor know it, and he who is, knoweth it indeed; but he cannot utter it, for it is unspeakable. Therefore let him who would know it, give his whole diligence that he may enter therein; then will he see and find what hath never been uttered by man's lips. However, I believe that such a man hath liberty as to his outward walk and conversation, so long as they consist with what must be or ought to be; but they may not consist with what he merely willeth to be. But oftentimes a man maketh to himself many must-be's and ought-to-be's which are false. The which ye may see hereby, that when a man is moved by his pride or covetousness or other evil dispositions, to do or leave undone anything, he ofttimes saith, "It must needs be so, and ought to be so." Or if he is driven to, or held back from anything by the desire to find favour in men's eyes, or by love, friendship, enmity, or the lusts and appetites of his body, he saith, "It must needs be so, and ought to be so." Yet behold, that is utterly false. Had we no must-be's, nor ought-to-be's, but such as God and the Truth show us, and constrain us to, we should have less, forsooth, to order and do than now; for we make to ourselves much disquietude and difficulty which we might well be spared and raised above.
How sometimes the Spirit of God, and sometimes also the Evil Spirit may possess a Man and have the mastery over him.It is written that sometimes the Devil and his spirit do so enter into and possess a man, that he knoweth not what he doeth and leaveth undone, and hath no power over himself, but the Evil Spirit hath the mastery over him, and doeth and leaveth undone in, and with, and through, and by the man what he will. It is true in a sense that all the world is subject to and possessed with the Evil Spirit, that is, with lies, falsehood, and other vices and evil ways; this also cometh of the Evil Spirit, but in a different sense,
He who will submit himself to God and be obedient to Him, must be ready to bear with all Things; to wit, God, himself, and all Creatures, and must be obedient to them all whether he have to suffer or to do.There be some who talk of other ways and preparations to this end, and say we must lie still under God's hand, and be obedient and resigned and submit to Him. This is true; for all this would be perfected in a man who should attain to the uttermost that can be reached in this present time. But if a man ought and is willing to lie still under God's hand, he must and ought also to be still under all things, whether they come from God himself, or the creatures, nothing excepted. And he who would be obedient, resigned and submissive to God, must and ought to be also resigned, obedient and submissive to all things, in a spirit of yielding, and not of resistance, and take them in silence, resting on the hidden foundations of his soul, and having a secret inward patience, that enableth him to take all chances or crosses willingly, and whatever befalleth, neither to call for nor desire any redress, or deliverance, or resistance, or revenge, but always in a loving, sincere humility to cry, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do!"
How that four Things are needful before a Man can receive divine Truth and be possessed with the Spirit of God.[31]Moreover there are yet other ways to the lovely life of Christ, besides those we have spoken of: to wit, that God and man should be wholly united, so that it can be said of a truth, that God and man are one. This cometh to Pass on this wise. Where the Truth always reigneth, so that true perfect God and true perfect man are at one, and man so giveth place to God, that God Himself is there and yet the man too, and this same unity worketh continually, and doeth and leaveth undone without any I, and Me, and Mine, and the like; behold, there is Christ, and nowhere else. Now, seeing that here there is true perfect manhood, so there is a perfect perceiving and feeling of pleasure and pain, liking and disliking, sweetness and bitterness, joy and sorrow, and all that can be perceived and felt within and without. And seeing that God is here made man, He is also able to perceive and feel love and hatred, evil and good and the like. As a man who is not God, feeleth and taketh note of all that giveth him pleasure and pain, and it pierceth him to the heart, especially what offendeth him; so is it also when God and man are one, and yet God is the man; there everything is perceived and felt that is contrary to God and man. And since there man becometh nought, and God alone is everything, so is it with that which is contrary to man, and a sorrow to him. And this must hold true of God so long as a bodily and substantial life endureth.
Of two evil Fruits that do spring up from the Seed of the Evil Spirit, and are two Sisters who love to dwell together. The one is called spiritual Pride and Highmindedness, the other is false, lawless Freedom.Now, after that a man hath walked in all the ways that lead him unto the truth, and exercised himself therein, not sparing his labour; now, as often and as long as he dreameth that his work is altogether finished, and he is by this time quite dead to the world, and come out from Self and given up to God alone, behold! the Devil cometh and soweth his seed in the man's heart. From this seed spring two fruits; the one is spiritual fulness or pride, the other is false, lawless freedom. These are two sisters who love to be together. Now, it beginneth on this wise: the Devil puffeth up the man, till he thinketh himself to have climbed the topmost pinnacle, and to have come so near to heaven, that he no longer needeth Scripture, nor teaching, nor this nor that, but is altogether raised above any need. Whereupon there ariseth a false peace and satisfaction with himself, and then it followeth that he saith or thinketh: "Yea, now I am above all other men, and know and understand more than any one in the world; therefore it is certainly just and reasonable that I should be the lord and commander of all creatures, and that all creatures, and especially all men, should serve me and be subject unto me." And then he seeketh and desireth the same, and taketh it gladly from all creatures, especially men, and thinketh himself well worthy of all this, and that it is his due, and looketh on men as if they were the beasts of the field, and thinketh himself worthy of all that ministereth to his body and life and nature, in profit, or joy, or pleasure, or even pastime and amusement, and he seeketh and taketh it wherever he findeth opportunity. And whatever is done or can be done for him, seemeth him all too little and too poor, for he thinketh himself worthy of still more and greater honour than can be rendered to him. And of all the men who serve him and are subject to him, even if they be downright thieves and murderers, he saith nevertheless, that they have faithful, noble hearts, and have great love and faithfulness to the truth and to poor men. And such men are praised by him, and he seeketh them and followeth after them wherever they be. But he who doth not order himself according to the will of these high-minded men, nor is subject unto them, is not sought after by them, nay, more likely blamed and spoken ill of, even though he were as holy as St. Peter himself. And seeing that this proud and puffed-up spirit thinketh that she needeth neither Scripture, nor instruction, nor anything of the kind, therefore she giveth no heed to the admonitions, order, laws and precepts of the holy Christian Church, nor to the Sacraments, but mocketh at them and at all men who walk according to these ordinances and hold them in reverence. Hereby we may plainly see that those two sisters dwell together.
Touching Poorness of Spirit and true Humility and whereby we may discern the true and lawful free Men whom the Truth hath made free.But it is quite otherwise where there is poorness of spirit, and true humility; and it is so because it is found and known of a truth that a man, of himself and his own power, is nothing, hath nothing, can do and is capable of nothing but only infirmity and evil. Hence followeth that the man findeth himself altogether unworthy of all that hath been or ever will be done for him, by God or the creatures, and that he is a debtor to God and also to all the creatures in God's stead, both to bear with, and to labour for, and to serve them. And therefore he doth not in any wise stand up for his own rights, but from the humility of his heart he saith, "It is just and reasonable that God and all creatures should be against me, and have a right over me, and to me, and that I should not be against any one, nor have a right to anything." Hence it followeth that the man doth not and will not crave or beg for anything, either from God or the creatures, beyond mere needful things, and for those only with shamefacedness, as a favour and not as a right. And he will not minister unto or gratify his body or any of his natural desires, beyond what is needful, nor allow that any should help or serve him except in case of necessity, and then always in trembling; for he hath no right to anything and therefore he thinketh himself unworthy of anything. So likewise all his own discourse, ways, words and works seem to this man a thing of nought and a folly. Therefore he speaketh little, and doth not take upon himself to admonish or rebuke any, unless he be constrained thereto by love or faithfulness towards God, and even then he doth it in fear, and so little as may be.
How we are to take Christ's Words when He bade forsake all Things; and wherein the Union with the Divine Will standeth.Now, according to what hath been said, ye must observe that when we say, as Christ also saith, that we ought to resign and forsake all things, this is not to be taken in the sense that a man is neither to do nor to purpose anything; for a man must always have something to do and to order so long as he liveth. But we are to understand by it that the union with God standeth not in any man's powers, in his working or abstaining, perceiving or knowing, nor in that of all the creatures taken together. Now what is this union? It is that we should be of a truth purely, simply, and wholly at one with the One Eternal Will of God, or altogether without will, so that the created will should flow out into the Eternal Will, and be swallowed up and lost therein, so that the Eternal Will alone should do and leave undone in us. Now mark what may help or further us towards this end. Behold, neither exercises, nor words, nor works, nor any creature nor creature's work can do this. In this wise therefore must we renounce and forsake all things, that we must not imagine or suppose that any words, works, or exercises, any skill or cunning or any created thing can help or serve us thereto. Therefore we must suffer these things to be what they are, and enter into the union with God. Yet outward things must be, and we must do and refrain so far as is necessary, especially we must sleep and wake, walk and stand still, speak and be silent and much more of the like. These must go on so long as we live.
How, after a Union with the Divine Will, the inward Man standeth immoveable, the while the outward Man is moved hither and thither.Now, when this union truly cometh to pass and becometh established, the inward man standeth henceforward immoveable in this union; and God suffereth the outward man to be moved hither and thither, from this to that, of such things as are necessary and right. So that the outward man saith in sincerity "I have no will to be or not to be, to live or die, to know or not to know, to do or to leave undone and the like; but I am ready for all that is to be, or ought to be, and obedient thereunto, whether I have to do or to suffer." And thus the outward man hath no Wherefore or purpose, but only to do his part to further the Eternal Will. For it is perceived of a truth, that the inward man shall stand immoveable, and that it is needful for the outward man to be moved. And if the inward man have any Wherefore in the actions of the outward man, he saith only that such things must be and ought to be, as are ordained by the Eternal Will. And where God Himself dwelleth in the man, it is thus; as we plainly see in Christ. Moreover, where there is this union, which is the offspring of a Divine light and dwelleth in its beams, there is no spiritual pride or irreverent spirit, but boundless humility, and a lowly broken heart; also an honest blameless walk, justice, peace, content, and all that is of virtue must needs be there. Where they are not, there is no right union, as we have said. For just as neither this thing nor that can bring about or further this union, so there is nothing which hath power to frustrate or hinder it, save the man himself with his self-will, that doeth him this great wrong. Of this be well assured.
How a Man may not attain so high before Death as not to be moved or touched by outward Things.There be some who affirm, that a man, while in this present time, may and ought to be above being touched by outward things, and in all respects as Christ was after His resurrection. This they try to prove and establish by Christ's words: "I go before you into Galilee there; shall ye see Me."[36] And again, "A spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see Me have."[37] These sayings they interpret thus: "As ye have seen Me, and been followers of Me, in My mortal body and life, so also it behoveth you to see Me and follow Me, as I go before you into Galilee; that is to say, into a state in which nothing hath power to move or grieve the soul; on which state ye shall enter, and live and continue therein, before that ye have suffered and gone through your bodily death. And as ye see Me having flesh and bones, and not liable to suffer, so shall ye likewise, while yet in the body and having your mortal nature, cease to feel outward things, were it even the death of the body."
On what wise we may came to be beyond and above all Custom, Order, Law, Precepts and the like.Some say further, that we can and ought to get beyond all virtue, all custom and order, all law, precepts and seemliness, so that all these should be laid aside, thrown off and set at nought. Herein there is some truth, and some falsehood. Behold and mark: Christ was greater than His own life, and above all virtue, custom, ordinances and the like, and so also is the Evil Spirit above them, but with a difference. For Christ was and is above them on this wise, that His words, and works, and ways, His doings and refrainings, His speech and silence, His sufferings, and whatsoever happened to Him, were not forced upon Him, neither did He need them, neither were they of any profit to Himself. It was and is the same with all manner of virtue, order, laws, decency, and the like; for all that may be reached by them is already in Christ to perfection. In this sense, that saying of St. Paul is true and receiveth its fulfilment, "As many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God," "and are not under the law, but under grace."[38] That meaneth, man need not teach them what they are to do or abstain from; for their Master, that is, the Spirit of God, shall verily teach them what is needful for them to know. Likewise they do not need that men should give them precepts, or command them to do right and not to do wrong, and the like; for the same admirable Master who teacheth them what is good or not good, what is higher and lower, and in short leadeth them into all truth, He reigneth also within them, and biddeth them to hold fast that which is good, and to let the rest go, and to Him they give ear. Behold! in this sense they need not to wait upon any law, either to teach or to command them. In another sense also they need no law; namely, in order to seek or win something thereby or get any advantage for themselves. For whatever help toward eternal life, or furtherance in the way everlasting, they might obtain from the aid, or counsel, or words, or works of any creature, they possess already beforehand. Behold! in this sense also it is true, that we may rise above all law and virtue, and also above the works and knowledge and powers of any creature.
How we are not to cast off the Life of Christ, but practise it diligently, and walk in it until DeathBut that other thing which they affirm, how that we ought to throw off and cast aside the life of Christ, and all laws and commandments, customs and order and the like, and pay no heed to them, but despise and make light of them, is altogether false and a lie. Now some may say; "Since neither Christ nor others can ever gain anything, either by a Christian life, or by all these exercises and ordinances, and the like, nor turn them to any account, seeing that they possess already all that can be had through them, what cause is there why they should not henceforth eschew them altogether? Must they still retain and practise them?"
How God is a true, simple, perfect Good, and how He is a Light and a Reason and all Virtues, and how what is highest and best, that is, God, ought to be most loved by us.In short, I would have you to understand, that God (in so far as He is good) is goodness as goodness, and not this or that good. But here mark one thing. Behold! what is sometimes here and sometimes there is not everywhere, and above all things and places; so also, what is to-day, or to-morrow, is not always, at all times, and above all time; and what is some thing, this or that, is not all things and above all things. Now behold, if God were some thing, this or that, He would not be all in all, and above all, as He is; and so also, He would not be true Perfection. Therefore God is, and yet He is neither this nor that which the creature, as creature, can perceive, name, conceive or express. Therefore if God (in so far as He is good) were this or that good, He would not be all good, and therefore He would not be the One Perfect Good, which He is. Now God is also a Light and a Reason,[40] the property of which is to give light and shine, and take knowledge; and inasmuch as God is Light and Reason, He must give light and perceive. And all this giving and perceiving of light existeth in God without the creature; not as a work fulfilled, but as a substance or well-spring. But for it to flow out into a work, something really done and accomplished,[41] there must be creatures through whom this can come to pass. Look ye: where this Reason and Light is at work in a creature, it perceiveth and knoweth and teacheth what itself is; how that it is good in itself and neither this thing nor that thing. This Light and Reason knoweth and teacheth men, that it is a true, simple, perfect Good, which is neither this nor that special good, but comprehendeth every kind of good.
How when a Man is made truly Godlike, his Love is pure and unmixed, and he loveth all Creatures, and doth his best for them.Hence it followeth, that in a truly Godlike man, his love is pure and unmixed, and full of kindness, insomuch that he cannot but love in sincerity all men and things, and wish well, and do good to them, and rejoice in their welfare. Yea, let them do what they will to such a man, do him wrong or kindness, bear him love or hatred or the like, yea, if one could kill such a man a hundred times over, and he always came to life again, he could not but love the very man who had so often slain him, although he had been treated so unjustly, and wickedly, and cruelly by him, and could not but wish well, and do well to him, and show him the very greatest kindness in his power, if the other would but only receive and take it at his hands. The proof and witness whereof may be seen in Christ; for He said to Judas, when he betrayed Him: "Friend, wherefore art thou come?" Just as if He had said: "Thou hatest Me, and art Mine enemy, yet I love thee and am thy friend. Thou desirest and rejoicest in My affliction, and dost the worst thou canst unto Me; yet I desire and wish thee all good, and would fain give it thee, and do it for thee, if thou wouldst but take and receive it." As though God in human nature were saying: "I am pure, simple Goodness, and therefore I cannot will, or desire, or rejoice in, or do or give anything but goodness. If I am to reward thee for thy evil and wickedness, I must do it with goodness, for I am and have nothing else." Hence therefore God, in a man who is "made partaker of His nature," desireth and taketh no revenge for all the wrong that is or can be done unto Him. This we see in Christ, when He said: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."
How that if a Man will attain to that which is best, he must forswear his own Will; and he who helpeth a Man to his own Will helpeth him to the worst Thing he can.Some may say: "Now since God willeth and desireth and doeth the best that may be to every one, He ought so to help each man and order things for him, that they should fall out according to his will and fulfil his desires, so that one might be a Pope, another a Bishop, and so forth." Be assured, he who helpeth a man to his own will, helpeth him to the worst that he can. For the more a man followeth after his own self-will, and self-will groweth in him, the farther off is he from God, the true Good, for nothing burneth in hell but self-will. Therefore it hath been said, "Put off thine own will, and there will be no hell." Now God is very willing to help a man and bring him to that which is best in itself, and is of all things the best for man. But to this end, all self-will must depart, as we have said. And God would fain give man His help and counsel thereunto, for so long as a man is seeking his own good, he doth not seek what is best for him, and will never find it. For a man's highest good would be and truly is, that he should not seek himself nor his own things, nor be his own end in any respect, either in things spiritual or things natural, but should seek only the praise and glory of God and His holy will. This doth God teach and admonish us. Let him therefore who wisheth that God should help him to what is best, and best for him, give diligent heed to God's counsels and teachings, and obey His commandments; thus, and not else, will he have, and hath already, God's help. Now God teacheth and admonisheth man to forsake himself and all things, and to follow Him only. "For he who loveth his soul,"[42] that is himself, and will guard it and keep it, "he shall lose it"; that is, he who seeketh himself and his own advantage in all things, in so doing loseth his soul. "But he who hateth his soul for My sake shall keep it unto life eternal"; that is, he who forsaketh himself and his own things, and giveth up his own will, and fulfilleth God's will, his soul will be kept and preserved unto Life Eternal.
How there is deep and true Humility and Poorness of Spirit in a Man who is "made a Partaker of the Divine Nature."Moreover, in a man who is "made a partaker of the divine nature," there is a thorough and deep humility, and where this is not, the man hath not been "made a partaker of the divine nature." So Christ taught in words and fulfilled in works. And this humility springeth up in the man, because in the true Light he seeth (as it also really is) that Substance, Life, Perceiving, Knowledge, Power, and what is thereof, do all belong to the True Good, and not to the creature; but that the creature of itself is nothing and hath nothing, and that when it turneth itself aside from the True Good in will or in works, nothing is left to it but pure evil. And therefore it is true to the very letter, that the creature, as creature, hath no worthiness in itself, and no right to anything, and no claim over any one, either over God or over the creature, and that it ought to give itself up to God and submit to Him because this is just. And this is the chiefest and most weighty matter.
How nothing is contrary to God but Sin only; and what Sin is in Kind and Act.Further ye shall mark: when it is said that such a thing or such a deed is contrary to God, or that such a thing is hateful to God and grieveth His Spirit, ye must know that no creature is contrary to God, or hateful or grievous unto Him, in so far as it is, liveth, knoweth, hath power to do, or produce ought, and so forth, for all this is not contrary to God. That an evil spirit, or a man is, liveth, and the like, is altogether good and of God; for God is the Being of all that are, and the Life of all that live, and the Wisdom of all the wise; for all things have their being more truly in God than in themselves, and also all their powers, knowledge, life, and the rest; for if it were not so, God would not be all good; And thus all creatures are good. Now what is good is agreeable to God, and He will have it. Therefore it cannot be contrary to Him.
How in God, as God, there can neither be Grief, Sorrow, Displeasure, nor the like, but how it is otherwise in a Man who is "made a Partaker of the Divine Nature."In God, as God, neither sorrow nor grief nor displeasure can have place, and yet God is grieved on account of men's sins. Now since grief cannot befall God without the creature, this cometh to pass where He is made man, or when He dwelleth in a Godlike man. And there, behold, sin is so hateful to God, and grieveth Him so sore, that He would willingly suffer agony and death, if one man's sins might be thereby washed out. And if He were asked whether He would rather live and that sin should remain, or die and destroy sin by His death, He would answer that He would a thousand times rather die. For to God one man's sin is more hateful, and grieveth Him worse than His own agony and death. Now if one man's sin grieveth God so sore, what must the sins of all men do? Hereby ye may consider, how greatly man grieveth God with his sins.
How we are to put on the Life of Christ from Love, and not for the sake of Reward, and how we must never grow careless concerning it, or cast it off.Now, wherever a man hath been made a partaker of the divine nature, in him is fulfilled the best and noblest life, and the worthiest in God's eyes, that hath been or can be. And of that eternal love which loveth Goodness as Goodness and for the sake of Goodness, a true, noble, Christ-like life is so greatly beloved, that it will never be forsaken or cast off. Where a man hath tasted this life, it is impossible for him ever to part with it, were he to live until the Judgment Day. And though he must die a thousand deaths, and though all the sufferings that ever befell all creatures could be heaped upon him, he would rather undergo them all, than fall away from this excellent life; and if he could exchange it for an angel's life, he would not.
How God will have Order, Custom, Measure, and the like in the Creature, seeing that He cannot have them without the Creature, and of four sorts of Men who are concerned with this Order, Law, and Custom.It is said, and truly, God is above and without custom, measure, and order, and yet giveth to all things their custom, order, measure, fitness, and the like. The which is to be thus understood. God will have all these to be, and they cannot have a being in Himself without the creature, for in God, apart from the creature, there is neither order nor disorder, custom nor chance, and so forth; therefore He will have things so that these shall be, and shall be put in exercise. For wherever there is word, work, or change, these must be either according to order, custom, measure and fitness, or according to unfitness and disorder. Now fitness and order are better and nobler than their contraries.
A good Account of the False Light and its Kind.Now I have said that there is a False Light; but I must tell you more particularly what it is, and what belongeth thereunto. Behold, all that is contrary to the True Light belongeth unto the False. To the True Light it belongeth of necessity, that it seeketh not to deceive, nor consenteth that any should be wronged or deceived, neither can it be deceived. But the false is deceived and a delusion, and deceiveth others along with itself. For God deceiveth no man, nor willeth that any should be deceived, and so it is with His True Light. Now mark, the True Light is God or divine, but the False Light is Nature or natural. Now it belongeth to God, that He is neither this nor that, neither willeth nor desireth, nor seeketh anything in the man whom He hath made a partaker of the divine nature, save Goodness as Goodness, and for the sake of Goodness. This is the token of the True Light. But to the Creature and Nature it belongeth to be somewhat, this or that, and to intend and seek something, this or that, and not simply what is good without any Wherefore. And as God and the True Light are without all self-will, selfishness, and self-seeking, so do the I, the Me, the Mine, and the like, belong unto the natural and false Light; for in all things it seeketh itself and its own ends, rather than Goodness for the sake of Goodness. This is its property, and the property of nature or the carnal man in each of us.
Now that he is to be called, and is truly, a Partaker of the Divine Nature, who is illuminated with the Divine Light, and inflamed with Eternal Love, and how Light and Knowledge are worth nothing without Love.Some may ask, "What is it to be a 'partaker of the divine nature,' or a Godlike man?" Answer: he who is imbued with or illuminated by the Eternal or divine Light, and inflamed or consumed with Eternal or divine love, he is a Godlike man and a partaker of the divine nature; and of the nature of this True Light we have said somewhat already.
A Question: whether we can know God and not love Him, and how there are two kinds of Light and Love -- a true and a false.Here is an honest question; namely, it hath been said that he who knoweth God and loveth Him not, will never be saved by his knowledge; the which sounds as if we might know God and not love Him. Yet we have said elsewhere, that where God is known, He is also loved, and whosoever knoweth God must love Him. How may these things agree? Here ye must mark one thing. We have spoken of two Lights -- a True and a False. So also there are two kinds of Love, a True and a False. And each kind of Love is taught or guided by its own kind of Light or Reason. Now, the True Light maketh True Love, and the False Light maketh False Love; for whatever Light deemeth to be best, she delivereth unto Love as the best, and biddeth her love it, and Love obeyeth, and fulfilleth her commands.
Whereby we may know a Man who is made a partaker of the divine Nature, and what belongeth unto him; and further, what is the token of a False Light, and a False Free-Thinker.Further mark ye; that when the True Love and True Light are in a man, the Perfect Good is known and loved for itself and as itself; and yet not so that it loveth itself of itself and as itself, but the one True and Perfect Good can and will love nothing else, in so far as it is in itself, save the one, true Goodness. Now if this is itself, it must love itself, yet not as itself nor as of itself, but in this wise: that the One true Good loveth the One Perfect Goodness, and the One Perfect Goodness is loved of the One, true and Perfect Good. And in this sense that saying is true, that "God loveth not Himself as Himself." For if there were ought better than God, God would love that, and not Himself. For in this True Light and True Love there neither is nor can remain any I, Me, Mine, Thou, Thine, and the like, but that Light perceiveth and knoweth that there is a Good which is all Good and above all Good, and that all good things are of one substance in the One Good, and that without that One, there is no good thing. And therefore, where this Light is, the man's end and aim is not this or that, Me or Thee, or the like, but only the One, who is neither I nor Thou, this nor that, but is above all I and Thou, this and that; and in Him all Goodness is loved as One Good, according to that saying: "All in One as One, and One in All as All, and One and all Good, is loved through the One in One, and for the sake of the One, for the love that man hath to the One."
How nothing is contrary to God but Self-will and how he who seeketh his own Good for his own sake, findeth it not; and how a Man of himself neither knoweth nor can do any good Thing.Now, it may be asked; is there aught which is contrary to God and the true Good? I say, No. Likewise, there is nothing without God, except to will otherwise than is willed by the Eternal Will; that is, contrary to the Eternal Will. Now the Eternal Will willeth that nothing be willed or loved but the Eternal Goodness. And where it is otherwise, there is something contrary to Him, and in this sense it is true that he who is without God is contrary to God; but in truth there is no Being contrary to God or the true Good.
How that where there is a Christian Life, Christ dwelleth, and how Christ's Life is the best and most admirable Life that ever hath been or can be.He who knoweth and understandeth Christ's life, knoweth and understandeth Christ Himself; and in like manner, he who understandeth not His life, doth not understand Christ Himself. And he who believeth on Christ, believeth that His life is the best and noblest life that can be, and if a man believe not this, neither doth he believe on Christ Himself. And in so far as a man's life is according to Christ, Christ Himself dwelleth in him, and if he hath not the one neither hath he the other. For where there is the life of Christ, there is Christ Himself, and where His life is not, Christ is not, and where a man hath His life, he may say with St. Paul, "I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me."[47] And this is the noblest and best life; for in him who hath it, God Himself dwelleth, with all goodness. So how could there be a better life? When we speak of obedience, of the new man, of the True Light, the True Love, or the life of Christ, it is all the same thing, and where one of these is, there are they all, and where one is wanting, there is none of them, for they are all one in truth and substance. And whatever may bring about that new birth which maketh alive in Christ, to that let us cleave with all our might and to nought else; and let us forswear and flee all that may hinder it. And he who hath received this life in the Holy Sacrament, hath verily and indeed received Christ, and the more of that life he hath received, the more he hath received of Christ, and the less, the less of Christ.
How entire Satisfaction and true Rest are to be found in God alone, and not in any Creature; and how he who Will be obedient unto God, must also be obedient to the Creatures, with all Quietness, and he who would love God, must love all Things in One.It is said, that he who is content to find all his satisfaction in God, hath enough; and this is true. And he who findeth satisfaction in aught which is this and that, findeth it not in God; and he who findeth it in God, findeth it in nothing else, but in that which is neither this nor that, but is All. For God is One and must be One, and God is All and must be All. And now what is, and is not One, is not God; and what is, and is not All and above All, is also not God, for God is One and above One, and All and above All. Now he who findeth full satisfaction in God, receiveth all his satisfaction from One source, and from One only, as One. And a man cannot find all satisfaction in God, unless all things are One to him, and One is All, and something and nothing are alike.[48] But where it should be thus, there would be true satisfaction, and not else.
A Question: Whether, if we ought to love all Things, we ought to love Sin also?Some may put a question here and say: "If we are to love all things, must we then love sin too?" I answer: No. When I say "all things," I mean all Good; and all that is, is good, in so far as it hath Being. The Devil is good in so far as he hath Being. In this sense nothing is evil, or not good. But sin is to will, desire, or love otherwise than as God doth. And Willing is not Being, therefore it is not good. Nothing is good except in so far as it is in God and with God. Now all things have their Being in God, and more truly in God than in themselves, and therefore all things are good in so far as they have a Being, and if there were aught that had not its Being in God, it would not be good. Now behold, the willing or desiring which is contrary to God is not in God; for God cannot will or desire anything contrary to Himself, or otherwise than Himself. Therefore it is evil or not good, and is merely nought.
How we must believe certain Things of God's Truth beforehand, ere we can come to a true Knowledge and Experience thereof.Christ said, "He that believeth not," or will not or cannot believe, "shall be damned." It is so of a truth; for a man, while he is in this present time, hath not knowledge; and he cannot attain unto it, unless he first believe. And he who would know before he believeth, cometh never to true knowledge. We speak not here of the articles of the Christian faith, for every one believeth them, and they are common to every Christian man, whether he be sinful or saved, good or wicked; and they must be believed in the first place, for without that, one cannot come to know them. But we are speaking of a certain Truth which it is possible to know by experience, but which ye must believe in, before that ye know it by experience, else ye will never come to know it truly. This is the faith of which Christ speaketh in that saying of His.
Of Self-will, and how Lucifer and Adam fell away from God through Self-will.It hath been said, that there is of nothing so much in hell as of self-will. The which is true, for there is nothing else there than self-will, and if there were no self-will, there would be no Devil and no hell. When it is said that Lucifer fell from Heaven, and turned away from God and the like, it meaneth nothing else than that he would have his own will, and would not be at one with the Eternal Will. So was it likewise with Adam in Paradise. And when we say Self-will, we mean, to will otherwise than as the One and Eternal Will of God willeth.
How this present Time is a Paradise and outer Court of Heaven, and how therein there is only one Tree forbidden, that is, Self-will.What is Paradise? All things that are; for all are goodly and pleasant, and therefore may fitly be called a Paradise. It is said also, that Paradise is an outer court of Heaven. Even so this world is verily an outer court of the Eternal, or of Eternity, and specially whatever in Time, or any temporal things or creatures, manifesteth or remindeth us of God or Eternity; for the creatures are a guide and a path unto God and Eternity. Thus this world is an outer court of Eternity, and therefore it may well be called a Paradise, for it is such in truth. And in this Paradise, all things are lawful, save one tree and the fruits thereof. That is to say: of all things that are, nothing is forbidden and nothing is contrary to God but one thing only: that is, Self-will, or to will otherwise than as the Eternal Will would have it. Remember this. For God saith to Adam, that is, to every man, "Whatever thou art, or doest, or leavest undone, or whatever cometh to pass, is all lawful and not forbidden if it be not done from or according to thy will, but for the sake of and according to My will. But all that is done from thine own Will is contrary to the Eternal Will."
Wherefore God hath created Self-will, seeing that it is so contrary to Him.Now some may ask: "Since this tree, to wit, Self-will, is so contrary to God and the Eternal Will, wherefore hath God created it, and set it in Paradise?"
How we must take those two Sayings of Christ: "No Man cometh unto the Father, but by Me," and "No Man cometh unto Me, except the Father which hath sent Me draw him."Christ saith: "No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me."[54] Now mark how we must come unto the Father through Christ. The man shall set a watch over himself and all that belongeth to him within and without, and shall so direct, govern, and guard his heart, as far as in him lieth, that neither will nor desire, love nor longing, opinion nor thought, shall spring up in his heart, or have any abiding-place in him, save such as are meet for God and would beseem him well, if God Himself were made Man. And whenever he becometh aware of any thought or intent rising up within him that doth not belong to God and were not meet for Him, he must resist it and root it out as thoroughly and as Speedily as he may.
Considereth that other saying of Christ, "No Man can come unto Me, except the Father, which hath sent Me, draw him."Christ hath also said: "No man cometh unto Me, except the Father, which hath sent Me, draw him."[58] Now mark: by the Father, I understand the Perfect, Simple Good, which is All and above All, and without which and besides which there is no true Substance, nor true Good, and without which no good work ever was or will be done. And in that it is All, it must be in All and above All. And it cannot be any one of those things which the creatures, as creatures, can comprehend or understand. For whatever the creature, as creature (that is, in her creature kind), can conceive of and understand, is something, this or that, and therefore is some sort of creature. And now if the Simple Perfect Good were somewhat, this or that, which the creature understandeth, it would not be the All, nor the Only One, and therefore not Perfect. Therefore also it cannot be named, seeing that it is none of all the things which the creature as creature can comprehend, know, conceive, or name. Now behold, when this Perfect Good, which is unnameable, floweth into a Person able to bring forth, and bringeth forth the Only-begotten Son in that Person, and itself in Him, we call it the Father.
How a Man shall not seek his own, either in Things spiritual or natural but the Honour of God only; and how he must enter in by the right Door, to wit, by Christ, into Eternal Life.If a man may attain thereunto, to be unto God as his hand is to a man, let him be therewith content, and not seek farther. This is my faithful counsel, and here I take my stand. That is to say, let him strive and wrestle with all his might to obey God and His commandments so thoroughly at all times and in all things, that in him there be nothing, spiritual or natural, which opposeth God; and that his whole soul and body with all their members may stand ready and willing for that to which God hath created them; as ready and willing as his hand is to a man, which is so wholly in his power, that in the twinkling of an eye, he moveth and turneth it whither he will. And when we find it otherwise with us, we must give our whole diligence to amend our state; and this from love and not from fear, and in all things whatsoever, seek and intend the glory and praise of God alone. We must not seek our own, either in things spiritual or in things natural. It must needs be thus, if it is to stand well with us. And every creature oweth this of right and truth unto God, and especially man, to whom, by the ordinance of God, all creatures are made subject, and are servants, that he may be subject to and serve God only.
THE END
[1] Au)to[therefore]s e)phnqrw/phsen i(/na h(mei=s
qeopoihqw=uen.--Athan. Orat. de Incarn. Verbi, tom. I. page.
108.
[2] "Homines dixit Deos, ex gradia sua
deificatos; non de substantia sua natos,"--Aug. in Psalm xlix.
(Ed. Bened. tom. iv. page 414.)
[3] Neander's "Kirchengeschichte," Band
6, S. 15, 20. This work and Schmitz's "Johannes Tauler von
Strasburg," are the authorities for most of the facts here mentioned.
[4] As quoted by Neander. Kirchengeschichte,
B. 6, S. 769.
[5] Neander, Kircshengeschichte, B. 6, S.
728.
[6] 1 Cor. 13:10.
[7] Isaiah 42:8.
[8] John 15:5.
[9] 1 Cor. 4:7.
[10] 2 Cor. 3:5.
[11] The writer is probably alluding to Ps.
49:8.
[12] John 3:8.
[13] Isaiah 57:21.
[14] John 14:27.
[15] John 16:33.
[16] Here Luther's Edition has the following
passage instead of the remainder of this chapter: "Therefore we should at all
times give diligent heed to the works of God and His commandments, movings, and
admonitions, and not to the works or commandments or admonitions of men."
[17] Eph. 4:22, 24.
[18] John 3:3.
[19] 1 Cor. 15:22.
[20] Matt. 12:30.
[21] 2 Peter 1:4.
[22] 1 Cor. 13:10.
[23] Matt. 16:24.
[24] Matt. 10:38.
[25] Luke 14:26.
[26] Rom. 8:14.
[27] Rom. 6:14.
[28] Matt. 10:20.
[29] See note 31.
[30] Matt. 10:22.
[31] The heading of this Chapter appears to
have no relation to its contents, while it perfectly suits the latter half of
Chapter xxii, which has nothing corresponding to it in the heading of that
chapter. As however the heading of Chapter xxiv. is common both to the
Wurtzburg MS. and Luther's editions, the translator has no option but to retain
it in its present position.
[32] Matt. xi. 29.
[33] Matt. 5:20.
[34] Galat. 4:4.
[35] Matt. 20:28.
[36] Matt. 26:32, and 28:7-10.
[37] Luke 24:39.
[38] Rom. 8:14, and 6:14.
[39] This is, as a Person--"God" being used
here as a proper name.--Tr.
[40] Cognition is the word which comes nearest
to the original Erkenntniss, but would not harmonise with the style of
the translation.
[41] Or, be realised.
[42] Mark 8:35. Our authorised version uses
the word "life" in this verse, but as that would not quite bring out the force
of the original, I have ventured to use the same word for yuch here, by which it is translated in the two succeeding
verses.
Except in this and another passage, where, in quoting John 3:8, pneuma is translated, as in Luther's version,
Spirit instead of Wind, our authorised version has been always
ahered to.--Tr.
[43] Namely, God's having a right to our
obedience.
[44] This is evidently an allusion to the
"Brethren of the Free Spirit," mentioned in the Historical Introduction.
[45] Isaiah 14:13, 14.
[46] Matt. 11:30.
[47] Galatians 2:20.
[48] Literally aught and nought,
itch und nicht; but aught means any thing, the idea of the
original is emphatically some thing, a part, not the whole.--Tr.
[49] Or realisation, wirklichkeit.
[50] This sentence is found in Luther's
edition, but not in that based on the Wurtzburg Manuscript.
[51] Namely, why God hath created the will.
[52] John 8:32-36.
[53] Matt. 10:38, and Luke 14:27.
[54] John 14:6.
[55] John 12:26.
[56] John 17:24.
[57] John 10:1, 3.
[58] John 6:44.
[59] John 10:1.
[60] John 6:38.
[61] Luke 6:46.
[62] Matt. 7:21.
[63] Matt. 19:17.
[64] Luke 10:27.