The Talmud is the Law of the Land

I’m going to comment later on the whole Anna Nicole Smith debacle, but in watching the probate hearing live on television, I find myself in grave danger of popping an aneurysm. This is exactly what is wrong with our country today. Anyone with cable access should tune in and watch this hearing.

It’s a perfect example of how our system of laws, laid down by our Gentile founding fathers, has been completely subverted by Talmudic shysters.

|

Who Is Anna's Next Of Kin

The issue before the court today is who is Anna Nicole Smith’s legal next of kin, and who, therefore, has the right to claim her remains for burial. I have so many observations fighting to come out in this post that I fear I won’t be able to capture them all before succumbing to the above-mentioned aneurysm.

Therefore, I’ll address this single issue: Howard K. Stern’s lawyer is arguing that he should be considered her next of kin because he was her “best friend in the world” and was with her ’til the end (notwithstanding the fact that she might not have met her untimely end had he not been with her, but that’s another story).

|

Vergie Arthur's Lawyer

Then you have the lawyer for Anna Nicole’s mother citing a Florida statute that clearly provides that if an adult dies unmarried, then the children shall be next of kin, unless they have not reached majority age, i.e., 18 years, in which case a parent can make the claim.

|

When Judges Push The Law Aside

Anna Nicole’s daughter is only five months old, ergo, her daughter cannot be considered her next of kin for purposes of disposal of her remains. Her will has not been submitted into evidence and apparently did not make any stipulations in this regard. She has a living mother who wants to bury her daughter. So case closed, right? Wrong! Not in America today where the laws are merely ideas meant to be interpreted by sages in black robes, at their discretion, even if said “discretion” actually turns the statute upside down!

|

Stern's Lawyer Says Howie Is Next Kin

Howard K. Stern’s lawyer is arguing that in a prior, similar case (I believe she cited Cohen v. Cohen), the judge ruled that the decedent’s girlfriend could be considered next of kin over a blood relation because they had been living together and had a wonderful relationship.

Out the window go marriage and blood relations, i.e., family, effectively nullifying traditional Christian values. So what we have in America today is a tiny minority of people who dominate our legal system and whose values are at odds with - and inimical to - the values the vast majority of Americans hold dear.

|

Is This Talmudic Law?

Do The Talmud is an unspeakably hate-filled book that purports to assign the “real” meaning of the Torah that God supposedly revealed to rabbis in some sort of esoteric way. Therefore, if the Old Testament says “thou shalt not kill,” the rabbis can magically interpret that to mean that the best of the Gentiles can all be killed. No contradiction there, right? And if the Torah dictates that descendency should be patrilineal and the Talmud makes it matrilineal, then God must cede to rabbinic interpretation, since He’s been known to lose debates to rabbis!

|

"OyVey" Yells the Judge

The judge in this case, by the way, could not be more Jewish if he were wearing a yarmulke. He alluded to his Bronx accent and runs his courtroom like everything’s a joke, and isn’t he the greatest sage since Maimonides!

Anna Nicole Smith’s attorney, Ron Rale, who sounds more like he really represents Howard K. Stern, just happened to mention to the judge that although he’s from California, his parents are from Brooklyn, i.e., I’m Jewish too, Your Honor. To which the judge replied: I think we’re going to be good friends.

|

The Mother Should Get Her Child

Our naive but well-intentioned forefathers codified a set of laws and tried to make them as clear as possible, for example, stipulating who the designated next of kin shall be in the case of an unmarried, adult decedent. But since a judge in a prior case arbitrarily decided a girlfriend can be the next of kin over a blood relation, that ruling then becomes “precedent” and can trump the actual statute.

|

|

What’s wrong with this picture?

So in future, similar cases, the statute is second in importance to the ruling the prior judge made, even if said ruling bears no resemblance to the actual statute! This is called “case law,” or more specifically, legislating from the bench.

That is Talmudic law. That is not the American way.

Joanna Francis Website

|
|

The Anna Nicole Murder
Judge 'Sollie' And Anna Nicole

Judicial Index