32. Hoss said in his confession that his men would smoke cigarettes
as they pulled the dead Jews out of the gas chambers ten minutes after
gassing. Isn't Zyklon-B explosive?
Now this is really absolute nonsense.
The minimal concentration causing explosion is 56,000 parts
per million. A concentration of 300 parts per million kills humans
within a few minutes. As a reference, one can look at "The Merck
Index" and the "CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,"
or consult any manual dealing with toxicity and flammability of
chemicals. There would have been no real danger of explosion even if
there were a bonfire burning in the gas chamber while the
execution was taking place.
In fact, the Nazis' own product literature on Zyklon-B, Nuremberg
document NI-9912, points this out:
Danger of explosion: 75 grams of HCN in 1 cubic meter of
air. Normal application approx. 8-10 grams per cubic meter,
therefore not explosive.
(By the way, the 8-10 grams per cubic meter is the concentration
needed for exterminating lice and other insects, not human beings.
Mammals require a much lower concentration and much shorter exposure
time.)
A
transcription
of the NI-9912 document is available on
Bradley Smith's web site,
incidentally, including the above quotation. So the
"revisionists" obviously know it exists. They just choose to
ignore it. Mr. Smith calls the document "inconvenient" --
that it may be...but to whom?
In any case, would the gas be explosive ten minutes into the
ventilation process, after enough of it had been swept away to render
the room nontoxic? Not a chance. If the Sonderkommando were smoking
cigarettes, they were obviously not wearing gas masks, so they would be
dead anyway unless the concentration were far below 100 parts per
million!
Why on earth does the IHR even bother to claim that explosion was a
possibility? If there were anywhere near enough HCN to cause an
explosion, any smoker would be long-dead from the poison anyway!
The facts are that the IHR has ignored basic reference works, failed
to notice the Nazis' own dismissal of this point, and jettisoned common
sense. This says a great deal about their level of scholarship.
And, for a brief digression...
It seems to say something about their honesty as well. Though they
ignore NI-9912 here, where it is inconvient, they actually use it in
other IHR publications! The so-called
Lueftl Report,
available from
Greg Raven's web site,
lifts figures from this document without a citation, when it says:
The evaporation of Zyklon B requires as many as 32 hours or as few as
six hours, depending on whether the ambient temperature ranges from
five to 30 degrees Celsius.
So they quote NI-9912 when it suits their purposes, and ignore it
when it doesn't. That pretty much sums up Holocaust
"revisionism."
And as long as we're on the topic, we might as well mention: that
statement, even just in and of itself, is blatant academic dishonesty.
NI-9912 does mention the figures of 6 to 32 hours, depending on
temperature. However, those numbers are how long it takes the insects
to die, and they have nothing to do with the evaporation time
of Zyklon-B. Here is the original text of the captured Nazi document:
Time needed to take effect: 16 hours, unless there are special
circumstances such a closed-in type of building, which requires less
time. If the weather is warm it is possible to reduce this to a minimum
of 6 hours. The period is to be extended to at least 32 hours if the
temperature is below 5 degrees Centigrade.
The strength and time as above are to be applied in the case of:
bugs, lice, fleas, etc., with eggs, larvae and chrysalises.
Again, the above is available on Bradley Smith's web site and is
called "inconvenient" -- again, inconvenient to whom?