Zionist Watch: The Writings of Patrick Grimm

By Patrick Grimm

Here is a response to my op-ed Jews and Nazis: They Need Each Other that I felt raised some intriguing facets on the issue of Zionism, some of these facets literally fueling the misunderstandings many people have about our cause and its motivations. Below Ryan’s comments, I will include my own thoughts and opinions.

P.K. Ryan said:

Hello Anti-Zionist, I have a question for you. I’ve always wondered why anti-semites (and I don’t necessarily mean you) are anti-Zionist. It would only seem logical to me that someone who has a strong dislike of the Jews would be pro-Zionist. This meaning that they should support a homeland for Jews so that they don’t live in your country. Now this is obviously a simplification of the issue and I understand that you can support a Jewish homeland without condoning their actions, but I’m just curious about your response to this. Perhaps you just don’t like the fact that so many American Jews or other non-Israeli Jews are so supportive of Israel?

Mr. Ryan,

First off, if you ‘do’ necessarily mean that I am an “anti-Semite”, that is fine with me. “Anti-Semite” is essentially a term that has no meaning. For one thing, many Jews are not Semites, especially the ones in America, and many Palestinians are Semitic. But I don’t even want to digress into that hair-splitting sidenote.

If you go by the dictionary definition of “anti-Semite”, a definition coincidentally written and crafted by Jews, it now includes everything from opposing Zionism, Israel or organized Jewry. If that is the meaning of what now passes for “anti-Semitism”, then count me in, P.K. It doesn’t matter one whit whether you think I am an “anti-Semite” or not on those grounds. The only real “anti-Semitism” I would classify as a moral offense would be pure mindless violence against someone just because they are Jewish and on no other grounds. This I would condemn, as would most individuals in this movement against the harrowing treachery of Zionism and Jewish radical chauvinism and racism.

Do I have a “strong dislike of Jews” in general? No, I certainly don’t, and I am more than ready to give them their credit and due for the positive inventions, discoveries and innovations they have brought to the world. But unlike many people (perhaps yourself, I don’t know) I am not afraid to condemn them for the destructive and pernicious movements they have created and pioneered, mostly in America, but also in Russia and Israel, that have caused a crisis for the rest of us. If Jews can be praised for their virtues (high IQ, group solidarity, intellectualism and emphasis on education) then they should certainly be grown-up enough to take honest criticism concerning the ideas that many, but not all Jews support (Marxism, socialism, radical feminism, and of course Zionism) and fund with their almost limitless wealth.

I would support a democratic state in the Middle East, providing that it guarantees equal rights for all citizens and also providing that it does not insert itself into American policymaking (i.e. Iraq) and does not demand that the American people prop up said regime with between three and six billion of their tax dollars. The Israel pro-Zionist lobby has been allowed to usurp the sovreignty of the United States for far too long. America is now an Israeli annex. You know it and I know it. Sadly, under such a scenario, it is not likely that much will change in the forseeable future when it comes to the Israel-Palestine debacle. But be that as it may, we shouldn’t be bankrolling the Zionist colonialist project. I would say the same thing even if I endorsed the state of Israel, and by now it should be apparent that I most assuredly do not.

You ask or politely suggest that “Perhaps you just don’t like the fact that so many American Jews or other non-Israeli Jews are so supportive of Israel?” Yeah, P.K., perhaps I don’t, because these “American Jews” or “non-Israeli Jews” are helping to give carte blanche to the criminals of the Zionist enterprise. They are sending their money and lending their media to a country that has actually committed terrorism against America and has spied on us repeatedly, stealing and selling our most sensitive secrets to the highest bidder. They have also helped to entangle us in endless wars that have no clear end in sight and no other objective but Israeli supremacy in the Middle East. Is that kosher with you, Mr. Ryan, or does it disquiet your conscience just a smidgen? I would hope and pray that it does.

Do take care and thanks for the comments.

Sincerely,
Patrick Grimm

By Patrick Grimm

Can you imagine if there were an international criminal gang made up of people of German descent? What if they controlled most of the world’s media and masterminded shadowy criminal networks in most of the countries in the world. Suppose they used their media power to cover up their crimes. Now envision yourself speaking out against this network and then being censored. You are promptly warned that to expose this crime/media syndicate makes you an “anti-German” bigot full of hatred and intolerance. Now you would probably laugh uncontrollably and say “I don’t care if they are Germans or Serbians! We are talking about crime here!”

Now substitute “Jew” for German and you now have the exact scenario we are facing in contemporary society. The media, the Jewish media, has literally purloined plain language, convoluted the issues at hand and now readily brands permanently anyone who stands up to the global empire of world Zionism. So you don’t hate Jews or even wish average hard-working Jews any ill whatsoever? Well, guess what? It doesn’t matter. To mention Jewish oligarchs robbing Russia blind makes you a dirty anti-Semite of the greasiest order. To mention Jewish Holocaust hucksters shaking down European nations to fund their lavish victimology industry makes you a Nazi sympathizer, collaborator, or both.

Look at our culture and the dearth of decent discourse, the sound-bite “gotcha!” games the jewsmedia plays against the critics of the Jew World Order, whether they are reputable people who are honored and well-respected or those unfortunate souls who have been relegated to the fringes and the ideological swamps. Both are lumped together and discarded as so much garbage. Our heritage is not all that has been stolen. The very words issuing from our mouths have been refashioned, molded and mutilated by the sinister kosher gangsters who now rule over us. They haven’t just stolen your nation, your honor, the vision and genius of your forebears. They have purloined the very utterances that rasp and vibrate from your lips, and they have coopted them for the sake of the clarion call of the Zionist Pied Piper. What else can I say? It’s all either been said before or stripped away, retarded or repackaged by the lying, lecherous language thieves who call themselves “Chosen.”

By Patrick Grimm

The gruff-voiced, self-congratulatory, self-appointed “cutting edge” so-called leader of the “truth movement” is at it again. Daryl Bradford Smith, much like a yapping dog craving attention has taken to attacking other individuals who are more successful in the anti-Zionist fight than himself. Like a child who is a little crabby that he isn’t getting picked first for the team, Smith has taken to maligning anyone who doesn’t recognize him as the general of the anti-Zionist army.

Of course, Smith has some help with his little temper tantrums. And how dare the rest of us, the lowly little writers and columnists chopping away at the tentacles of the colossus of Zionist power that sits atop us, not recognize the “Holy Trinity” at http://iamthewitness.com and the ingenious, invaluable work coming from the second-rate program called the French Connection. Who is the “Holy Trinity” who literally demands, cries and begs for us to prostrate ourselves before its superior wisdom and pure motives? Why it’s the triumvirate of Daryl Bradford Smith, Eric Hufschmid and Chris Bollyn, of course. It’s the triumvirate of tar-and-feather, smear and innuendo and an almost intrinsic political bad faith. The fact that Smith’s little soiree into anti-Zionist polemics seems so self-serving is exactly why this hack of a broadcaster, and his two ghost-writing minions should be called out for the hucksters they are.

Smith and his PMSy pals have done some interesting commentary in the past, before they decided that they were self-destined to be the only game in town. Now at least 50% of their writing and internet radio broadcasts (broadcast out of France, rather than the good ol’ USA) are taken up with painting any individual who doesn’t agree with everything they say as a “closet Zionist” a “Zionist collaborator” or part of the “criminal network”. Hardly anyone has escaped their infantile witchhunt. Here is one small snippet of the kind of work that passes for scholarship on the smarmy website of the “Fab Three”:

“By the end of 2006, it became obvious that the “truth seekers” had separated into two distinct groups. The Zionist agents are completely avoiding Christopher Bollyn, Eric Hufschmid, and Daryl Bradford Smith.

They justify the avoidance of us by claiming we are ‘anti-Semites’ or ‘Holocaust Deniers’, but the real reason they avoid us is because we are exposing Zionism. They don’t want people to hear what we have to say.” [1]

So it’s everybody else, all of them possible covert Zionist confederates on one side, and the brave and courageous threesome of Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn arrayed on the other side. These three mediocre talents will never be content unless they are seen as the be-all and end-all of the “truth movement” instead of what they really are, loud voices demanding recognition that they don’t deserve. But the grasping, overreaching French Connection frauds don’t stop blowing their own horns. They continue:

“Now compare that to what comes from Alex Jones, Ted Gunderson, Anthony Hilder, Mark Lane, Mark Weber, Curt Maynard, Webster Tarpley, the antiwar groups, the veterans groups, the Institute for Historical Review, Don Harkins of The Idaho Observer, and all other investigators and truth seekers.

The three of us (Bollyn, Hufschmid, and Smith) are the newcomers. Yet in the span of a few years, we have produced more important material that all of the other people put together. And all of those other investigators try to ignore us.

There are not many ways to explain this. Either the other people are incredibly stupid, or they are Zionist agents.

If you look closely at any of the un-productive people, you will find that they are not stupid. Instead, you will find that they have mysterious connections to one another.

It is too difficult for any of us to understand what these connections are, but you can see that something is suspicious. As an example, consider the strange connections between Anthony Hilder and other suspicious people.” [1]

What a non sequitur these dolts have set up! After slandering and demonizing people of good will in this movement, those such as Curt Maynard and Mark Glenn, as well as other adroit deconstructers of Zionism, Smith and company descend into ludicrous illogic. I don’t know if it is provoked by paranoia or just opportunism. Smith’s ghostwriter, the bitchy Hufschmid writes “And all of those other investigators try to ignore us. There are not many ways to explain this. Either the other people are incredibly stupid, or they are Zionist agents.”

No, Eric, they ignore you because you are a mildly irritating irrelevance, like a fly buzzing around a picnic. Your exaggerated fits of righteous indignation and your name-calling and innuendo guarantee that you will be ignored and your research jettisoned. You are a pathetic nuisance for the bigger intellectual lights on the internet who won’t adopt and ingest everything you compose and splash onto your hackneyed website as “Holy Writ.” But I suppose that not giving you your due makes me a Zionist agent or a secret collaborator with the criminal network. What kind of reasoning is that? I guess it is the same sort of reasoning that requires you to make up for mommy’s inattention to you during your youth. You just want to be loved and adored, don’t you, you Elmer Gantry snake oil salesman?

Daryl, Eric and Chris should be investigated and exposed to the light of day by those in this political fight. I want to know where the money is coming from, how Smith doesn’t get himself arrested in France for his un-PC ideas (how convenient) and who has him on their payroll. Here is an interesting piece questioning the motives of the Three Amigos. It poses some unsettling and disquieting questions about these clowns. The author of it even asserts that “The Zionists employ a few key people such as Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn. Their agent provocateur role is intended to create division and mistrust between people in the movement who should be natural allies. Smith’s followers - call them the Smithsonians - are taught that iamthewitless is the one true truth-teller, and Smith skeptics are ‘Crypto-Zionists’. If a Smithsonian sees someone posting in an internet forum who is anti-Smith, he or she is encouraged to counter it.” [2]

I would bet dollars to doughnuts that the Smith/Hufschmid/Bollyn cabal is merely a Zionist-financed distraction, sent by the Judeophile powers to stir up dissension, distrust and disorder among the ranks of the true exposers of world international Zionism. Where’s the money coming from, Daryl, and why has the French government given you a pass when they are prosecuting, fining and jailing people with much more political and monetary clout than you possess? I would assert that the answer is simple. The Smith/Hufschmid/Bollyn routine is a carnival side show, paid for by our enemies. It is doing its damnedest to substitute sober analysis and real research with smear campaigns and the politics of paranoia, all under the clever guise of the “truth movement.” Hey Daryl, I think you and your two twisted troglodytes should go and find new employment. Perhaps Vaudeville?

[1] http://www.iamthewitness.com/Ostrovsky-deception.html
[2] http://www.takeourworldback.com/short/hufschmid.htm

By Patrick Grimm

I took a brief vacation this past week to sort out my thoughts and clear my mind. Thinking pragmatically is something I don’t always do, but I think it is time that I get a little ‘practical’ for the sake of the cause. A reader of Zionist Watch in the last several weeks responded to one of my briefer entries, asking what exactly we need to do in order to break the back of Zionist Jewish supremacist hegemony in America. Here are a few of my suggestions:

1. Tell the truth
There is a saying that states “The truth has a certain ring to it.” This is absolutely spot on philosophically. The human mind craves truth, needs it like the human body needs water and sustenance. When it comes to Zionism, a simple, easily repeatable truth is preferable. Don’t always tell the whole truth at once, but at least reveal a snippet of it to whomever you are conversing with. Don’t overwhelm people, but state the facts and only the facts. Remember too that sometimes telling too much at once is worse than saying nothing at all. Don’t beat people over the head, but don’t be afraid to insert your two cents either.

2. Simply act
What does this entail? It doesn’t necessarily entail going door to door like a Mormon with a white shirt and bicycle or behaving like that Jehovah’s Witness prosyletizer who is always ignored (though pamphlets, flyers and the passing out of literature may have its place). Do something tangible, but not always something audacious. Create a blogspot, a website or just a simple discussion board on an already existing forum. State facts, give links to pertinent and germane articles and op-eds. You don’t even have to be the greatest writer in the world, but do what you can to get factual and engaging information in front of as many eyes as possible. Any proactive action is better than inaction.

3. Create consensus
The way Zionist power and Jewish supremacist treason will be beaten back will not be at the ballot box (for both parties are under its strong-arming control), in the big Jewish-controlled media or by most of the other outlets coopted by Zionists. We cannot wait for a leader to come and take up our mantle. An armed struggle against our one-worlder adversaries would only give the government carte blanche to silence us with force and to further tighten its control over us. After all, we really do have a ZOG (Zionist-Occupied Government) at this point. It’s not a fantasy of loony skinheads and neo-Nazis. It’s a reality. The only real way to affect change is simply to change minds one at a time. It doesn’t sound like a distinguished answer to our calamity, but it is really the only practical one. The more individuals who are aware, awake and acutely tuned in to the nature of the beast, cognizant of the direness and deadly danger of what Zionism will bring to pass, the better the chance of eventual victory. Creating consensus is not just the best hope we have. It is truly the only hope we have.

I will delve into other practical steps we can take to win in future posts, but until then, keep up the fight. Rest assured that I will be back with more articles and op-eds in the coming days.

By Patrick Grimm

This is sort of an interesting little tidbit:

Frank Collins, a modern Fuhrer, marched in Skokie, IL, which has the largest population of Holocaust survivors.

In 1980, Collins was discovered to be a Jew named Frank Cohen - he was convicted of hiring underage boys and violating them – sent to a country club prison by a Jewish judge and released after three years.

1984 — Frank Cohen gets out of prison and moves to Wisconsin. Now, Frank Collins goes by the name of Frank Joseph and publishes an Internationally-known magazine, The Ancient American. With his newfound wealth he travels to South America where he happens to enjoy some young boys. [1]

What is this, you say? Jews running neo-Nazi outfits is a little bizarre. And the fact that this Illinois Nazi march through a predominately Jewish community was heralded and protected by the American Civil Liberties Union, a Communist lawyers guild replete with Jewish attorneys from the leftmost ideological fever swamps is even stranger. Strange that is, until you understand that trumpeting continual pseudo-persecution is the feather in the cap or the jewel in the crown of the Judaic kings of America. It is foremost in their playbook, a volume made up mostly of tricks, smoke, mirrors and sleight of hand. For you see, as I stated in my article of several days ago, Manufacturing Hate, the false flag is always ready to be utilized by Judeocentrists and their lesser minions in the Jewish fold.

But Zionist-minded Jews have done this sort of thing in the past, chiefly out of sheer expediency and political opportunism. As Lenni Brenner observes in Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis:

However difficult it may be, the reader must confront some rather disturbing conclusions. The most unsettling realization for this reviewer is that pre-Holocaust Zionists were able to politically align themselves with the Nazis because both groups fundamentally saw race as an important dividing line—and, moreover, were determined to keep it that way. From Vladimir Jabotinsky to Albert Einstein, “assimilation” of Jews into the societies in which they lived was not an acceptable option. Rather, Jewish nationalism required equality on a national level, not a personal one. As Jabotinsky explained, “It is impossible for a man to become assimilated with people whose blood is different from his own” (p. 10); in Einstein’s words, “Palestine is first and foremost not a refuge for East European Jews, but the incarnation of a reawakening sense of national solidarity” (p. 29). Finally, David Yisraeli, a member of the Stern Gang, wrote the following in late 1940, as part of a proposal to Hitler. It was delivered in 1941 to two German diplomats in Lebanon. [2]

Quite simply put, Zionist Jews and Nazis needed and still need each other. The Zionists who were working so hard to shove through the establishment of Israel would fashion any alliance or make any devil’s bargain to bring it about. The same is true today, though most of the Nazis spoken of in the present tense are simply imaginary bogeymen, used to keep the existential reality of Jewish suffering not only alive, but always current and always imminent. If the Nazis they need are not to be found in any plentitude, then they shall be created out of a vapor, whether they be fraudulent National Socialist websites crafted by Jews on the internet or by fashioning Iran’s president into “the Hitler of the Middle East” who craves the extinction of the Jewish state.

This is an alliance, or in the case of false flag websites and blogspots, a mirage crafted by the most devious and obliquitous snake oilers ever to come down the pike. More Nazis equals more “anti-Semitism.” More “anti-Semitism” equals more money rolling in from rich Jewish donors to big Jewish organizations like ADL and AIPAC. More money rolling in to Jewish organizations equals more bought support from our politicians for the Israeli criminal nation and more votes against UN vetoes of Israeli crimes. More support for Israel and more support in the UN from America equals more displacement of Palestinians and more land for emboldened Zionist Jews. More displacement and more land means more power and still more money for Jews. More money for Jews means more false flags like neo-Nazi organizations and more pushing of the Jewish multicult pyramid scheme in the United States. By now you can see how the circle of treason spins. Notice how splendidly it all works for them?

Just keep in mind that Jews and Nazis need each other. It is a partnership made in hell, but for the Zionists it must feel like manna from heaven. If international Zionism wasn’t so utterly noxious for the USA and the rest of the world, you would almost have to admire their brilliance in executing this whole charade. I can just picture some radical Jew with a cheshire cat grin rubbing his hands together in glee as he sneers “And they talk so much about German efficiency. Wait’ll they get a load of us.”

SOURCES
[1] http://www.judicial-inc.biz/Klassen.htm
[2]http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/zionism/zionist_collaboration_with_the_nazis.htm

By Patrick Grimm

What is acting? In the simplest sense ‘acting’ is taking action. It is doing something. It is movement, it is ‘act’tivity towards some end. Knowing everything you know about Zionism and Jewish power, what are you doing? Are you exposing their lies and their crimes and trumpeting the truth? Are you ‘acting’? Simply act, so that the benighted masses may merely live to act simply.

By Patrick Grimm

Big Brother is watching you. You know that, don’t you? The Jewish so-called anti-hate websites like B’nai B’rith and People For the American Way are keeping a sharp and focused eye on the political websites of their anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish supremacist enemies. The dossiers are filling up and the Nixonian enemies lists are getting longer and longer. The Jewish Defense League, classified by the United States government as a terrorist group has even taken to torching the offices and homes of their ideological opponents. They will even use arson against synagogues if necessary to create the illusion of a crazed anti-Semitic America about to descend into a Nazification stage of regression, with pogroms and concentration camps on their way. If they have to spraypaint a swastika or a ZOG on a Jewish day center to cobble up that illusion, then so be it.

Big Brother is watching you. Of course, Big Brother is Jewish and Zionist, as we know so well. This internet freedom of speech you are reveling in, basking in, taking for granted as a reprieve from Jewish TV, Jewish radio, Jewish newspapers and Jewish-owned publishing companies, could be coming to an end if they are allowed to press their anti-free speech agenda on the web in the same way they have done a thorough political cleansing in every other area of independent thought and open inquiry.

But oh, you will protest that I am being much too negative. What you don’t realize is that radical Jews are the masters of false flag operations. I’m sure you have heard the Israeli Mossad motto “By deception we shall wage war.” Think about how that could apply to the World Wide Web. Jews will continue and currently are agitating in Congress and in the Senate and in most of the governments of Europe for restrictions on speech and for the blocking of internet “hate” sites, meaning any sites exposing Jewish and Zionist crimes and falsehoods. When there are not enough of those sites for them to cite as evidence and justification for repression on the web, and when officials look into the matter and find the truth, that most anti-Zionists and simple white preservationists are not back-scratching, toothless, illiterate members of anti-government militia groups, many people will balk at the fascistic brand of censorship that organized Jewry demands. Ordinary people will start to realize that the critics of Zionism and organized Jewish power are absolutely correct in their assessments and that these critics are, with a few exceptions, mostly patriotic and well-informed writers and activists concerned about the destruction of their culture. We see this occurring right now as the internet opens more and more minds to the facts and to the truth.

“Oh, what to do, what to do?” ponder the schizoid agents of Zion. “Oh, I think I’ve got it!” And they do have it, the shrewd and duplicitous brainchild that will undo the Goyim’s last intact bastion of non-kosher information. It’s the best contrivance they have masterminded since the Mossad almost pulled off the false flag attacks against American installations in the devious Lavon Affair and nearly got us into a Jewish war for Israel against the nation of Egypt. (Sound familiar? It should be a familiar pattern by now.) If there is not enough crackpot hatred being directed against Jews and Israel online, then it’s time to manufacture it! Why, it’s almost as underhanded as 9/11! “If we can’t get enough hate, and a copious enough amount of hate from the Goyim who surf the net, then by Moses, we will create anti-Jewish hate ourselves, and believe us, we are experts on hate!”

And this will be the blueprint, the template they resort to in order to separate us from our autonomy as imbibers of informational assets they don’t wish us to see. “We need more screwy neo-Nazis on the internet! Throw some Shoah money over here, and we’ll create them!” And so it goes. I have gotten so skeptical as of late that any time I am surfing around doing research on Zionism or Jews and see websites adorned with prominently displayed Nazi swastikas, photos of Adolf Hitler or the use of words such as “kike” or “nigger”, words meant to enrage people, I automatically think “False Flag!” When I happen upon blogs celebrating the Third Reich or the Nazi regime or calling themselves National Socialists, the first thing that pops into my mind is “False Flag!” Sites or resources calling for a “Second Holocaust” or cheering for “more gas chambers” are, in all likelihood all a big fauxish “False Flag!”

Intellectual frauds and opportunistic provocateurs such as Daryl Bradford Smith, Eric Hufschmid and Chris Bollyn, who do nothing but stir up dissension and spread lies and innuendo about others who are more successful fighters in this cause should also be filed under the “False Flag!” category. Smith and his French Connection are probably paid for by the same shyster pettifoggers and Mammonite smooth operators who play us Gentiles for saps 24-7. Just open up your window and shout “FALSE FLAG!”

You may perceive me to be a mite paranoid on this issue, but I truly believe that most of the radical neo-Nazi groups and their intentionally hyperbolic, hammy and carcatural websites are, in all likelihood owned and operated by Jews. It is the perfect ploy, the consummate shell game, and it is working for them. It will only aid in the gradual eroding of internet freedom of speech and shut off our last channel of opposition to Jewish skullduggery. “Oy vey, it’s hate and anti-Semitism!” they will cry out in a whiny Brooklyn accent. And yes, they will have the phony, flim-flam, doctored evidence to prove it. The business of manufacturing hate may even eventually rake in more ill-gotten lucre for the Jews than 40 profitable ‘Shoah’ years of selling victimhood. The only difference this Gentile go-round is that some of us are going to call them on it. “False flag!”

By Patrick Grimm

A reader of Zionist Watch, humorously giving himself the sobriquet SkinHeadzMustDie, had some frank criticism of my approach in tackling the hot button of Jewish-Zionist extremism. I actually found his succinct post rather funny bone-tickling. Below SkinHeadz’ comments are my own responses. Read on.

SkinHeadzMustDie wrote:

You’re one of the “some Jews are good” camp, I see. Pretty funny. Even whites who understand what Jews do still make allowances for some mythical “good Jews”. The only “good Jews” are those who are utter slaves to the WN agenda: how many of those do you suppose there are? and does one have the right to expect Jews to be so very “good”? Making allowances says to the reader: “I’m a good person. I’m not foaming at the mouth with ‘hate’. I recognize that not all Jews are bad. I have Jewish friends.”, etc. It says to real people: “I’m afraid to condemn Jews as a whole because I fear public opinion. I know in my heart that Jews are uniformly villainous and opposed, in their hearts, to any society that I and my kind could create and manage, but I am not willing to say that because I don’t want to come off as a rabid ‘hater.”

SkinHeadzMustDie,

I am so glad you find my approach to the malignancy of Zionism and Jewish supremacism “pretty funny.” I am so privileged to have been able to elicit a good belly laugh from such an all-knowing superintellectual such as yourself. But unlike you, I don’t pepper my blogspot offerings with ‘f’ words and schoolyard insults the kind of which your own writings seem to be rife with. I guess it makes you feel like a big man and a true revolutionary to spit out gutter language with such posturing and poseuristic machismo. You seem to have a variety of vendettas brewing on your blog that I suppose you feel warrant obscene language and childish temper tantrums. I won’t delve into any of your numerous tirades, but you do seem like a very angry man.

But on to your post. If, as you declare, I am one of the commentators in the “’some Jews are good’ camp”, then what would you suggest as any alternative viewpoint? Filling my heart with hatred for every Jew on the planet and using just the kind of dialogue and discourse that only serve to drive potential converts away? Jewish supremacism is poisoning our world, but it hardly means that there is not a single Jew on earth who opposes it and opposes it out of sincere and pure motives. I understand perfectly well, sir, what organized Jewry is up to in this country and indeed around the world. But no, I don’t agree that it is “mythical” to believe that somewhere, somehow there are a few good Jews dotting the landscape of earth. But apparently it never occurs to you that the best way to stop world Zionism is to focus on the criminals running the moneyed Zionist organizations who are doing the most damage.

Sir, I am a white person who is a patriot. Please explain what you mean when you speak of “utter slaves to the WN (I assume white nationalist in this instance) agenda.” Is the white nationalist agenda akin to slavery in your mind or in the minds of your confederates, whoever they may be? Is white nationalism in your opinion synonymous with National Socialism or radical governmental authoritarianism? Or perhaps just straight unalloyed fascism is more your forte? I really don’t know. Maybe you would prefer a neo-Nazi arm band-sporting, SS-loving, goose-stepping ‘Death to the Jews!’ approach to this entire little conundrum. If that is the case, and after glancing at your blog it is impossible to tell, then I guess you can count me out.

But you continue with your prejudgments of my motives and/or supposed agenda. You state “and does one have the right to expect Jews to be so very ‘good’?” I guess my answer would have to be “no, I really have never stated that it was my expectation that Jews would be ’so very good’ or even anything other than mostly ethnocentric in nature.” Considering the volcanic fury coming from your blog, I am not exactly astonished that you find the tone of my work to be too tame and temperate for your enraged sensibilities. Any well-worded criticism I had for Jews would be too meek and mild for a self-styled firebrand such as yourself.

And oh, golly gee, I have been “making allowances” to “the reader” it seems, or so you are ready to believe. But why am I doing it, Skinz? Is it because I want people to think “I’m a good person. I’m not foaming at the mouth with ‘hate’. I recognize that not all Jews are bad. I have Jewish friends. etc.”

No, you are dead wrong again, my friend. I am not all that concerned about being seen as a “good person” by anyone other than myself and God. Whether the reader thinks I am a good person or not, I really have no control over his/her opinion of me. What a silly thing to be worried about as a writer, unless you really are crafting vile and obscenity-laden polemics, such as the kind written by somebody whose name is SkinHeadzMustDie. Stop projecting your own insecurities onto me. There’s no future in it.

Am I worried about being perceived as “foaming at the mouth with ‘hate’” on this site? No, not in the least. If the truth of what I say is interpreted as hatred toward Jews or blacks or any other identifiable group, then so be it. I am definitely not making any allowances to avoid that perception among individuals who may view my compositions and could possibly decipher them in a negative light. I say what I want to say and people either want to read it or they don’t. It’s as simple as that.

I must state truthfully that I have absolutely no “Jewish friends” at all. I have done some stage work with a few Jews while acting in the theatre, another of my passions, but I know very few Jewish people at all. The Jews that I did act with were very nice to me and they were never involved in any blood sacrifices as far as I know. But I jest.

Skinz, I will say that I don’t “fear public opinion” and am not frightened of being shunned for my views. In fact, I have just applied for a job with a well-known anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish supremacist think tank which, were I to be hired, would definitely get my name mentioned in the hostile and Jewish-run media. Do I fear that? No, I really don’t.

I don’t know if I believe that Jews are “uniformly villianous” but perhaps they are disproportionately villianous in our society. There does seem to be enough evidence to support that assertion. But I suppose that is not mean or vindictive enough to satisfy your scorched earth approach to the entire affair. There is a saying that goes something like “Moderation in all things, except love.” Your philosophy seems to be “Moderation in no things, especially Jews and personal grudges.” It’s sort of sad, but what should one expect? I mean, you’ve got a whole blog dedicated to churlish, boorish and childish fits of temper.

In closing, I would either encourage you to keep reading or discourage you from continuing reading. Either way is fine with me. But to chastise someone for not being as hateful as yourself is a ridiculous exercise in something, though I can’t think of what at this moment. So don’t let the door hit you on the way out or smack you on the way back in when you come to peruse another article that will eternally be written in not nearly a neo-fascist enough style for you. Have a nice day and remember to keep using a lot of ‘f’ words in your blog articles so people can at least take you half-way serious as a menacing schoolyard bully.

By Patrick Grimm

Now here is an interesting little item that I happened upon while cruising my favorite anti-Zionist blogspots and websites. My pal at News From The West posted this pertinent little snippet that I will share with you, the attentive reader. Keep in mind that this particular chunk of news did not show up in a newspaper, but was posted on the website of the University of Cambridge. In fact, it was on the administration page of their website. And without further ado, here it is in all its chutzpahistic glory:

Scholars to discuss limits on speaking evil

The problems caused when freedom of speech crosses the boundary with extremism and racial hatred are to come under scrutiny at a conference in Cambridge later this month.

Legal experts from around the world will take part in the event, which will focus on whether and how to control freedom of speech by extremists voicing their opinions.

Entitled “Extreme Speech and Democracy”, the conference is being arranged by the University of Cambridge’s Centre for Public Law in partnership with the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law in Arizona and will be held at the Law Faculty in Cambridge.

The participants will examine how extreme speech should be regulated in a democratic society. In particular, they will address whether incitement to religious hatred, the glorification of terrorism and holocaust denial should be forbidden in countries where freedom of speech is a key principle of law.

More than 25 legal experts from around the world will be taking part in a series of panel discussions. The keynote speakers will be the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, and Professor Dieter Grimm, a constitutional law specialist from Humboldt University in Berlin.

Topics to be covered include: Incitement to racial and religious hatred, the veil controversies, Holocaust denial, the glorification of terrorism, media regulation and self-restraint, and religious speech that offends secular values.

James Weinstein, who is a visitor at the Cambridge Law Faculty and is organising the event said: “Unlike in the US, where the First Amendment protects even the most extreme and obnoxious forms of public discourse, the dominant view in the UK and Europe seems to be that the constitutional commitment to free speech is compatible with the regulation of speech that profoundly offends basic societal norms.

“The primary goal of this conference is to determine whether this more regulatory view is consistent with the commitment to democratic self-governance. With all the various controversies concerning extreme speech recently in the news, this conference seems particularly timely.”

The event will be held at the Faculty of Law, Cambridge, on April 21 and 22. The cost for academics wishing to attend is £100, which includes dinner in the evening. A special student rate of £50 is also available. Full details can be found by following the links to the right of this page or by contacting the Centre of Public Law on 01223 330042.

For further information, please contact the University of Cambridge Office of Communications on 01223 332300 [1]

Now let’s see if we can exegete this academically-instigated piecemeal preparation of America for full-blown Jewish totalitarian rule, much like the residents of the UK now live under, every one of them withering and cowering beneath the weighty yoke of their one-worlder Zionist masters.

First of all we can clearly see that this whole soiree has been funded by Sandra Day O’Connor’s little outfit in Arizona. O’ Connor, a leftist wolf who was ushered into the Supreme Court while wearing her rightist sheep’s clothing, proved to be a fraud through and through. O’Connor was praised by the Jewish, predominately the frothing-at-the-mouth Jewish leftist American media machine for “growing” and “maturing” while she sat on the Supreme Court.

What “growing” and “maturing” mean to the lunatic Jewish media has nothing to do with true enlightenment or the deepening of one’s intellect through study and reflection. No, it has more to do with selling out America and shredding the greatest document for self-rule ever composed by man, the US Constitution. “Growing” means bending to the radical ACL-Jew unreconstructed neo-Communists like Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. It requires one to give a hearty thumbs-up to the free reign of celebrated sodomy and the homo-Judeo-Bolsheviks who push it on our kids. It obligates a Supreme Court justice to see the wisdom of expanding the license of the mainly Jewish-funded pro-abortion, pro-infanticide industry to ply their grisly trade, enforcing their Talmudic views on the issue in the process.

“Talmudic views on abortion? What does that mean?” you might ask me if you are a newcomer to this site and not used to the harsh prose and unapologetic words I cast upon my extremist Jewish antagonists. Here is a quote from a site called http://religioustolerance.org citing the dictates of rabbinical authorities on the issue. And believe me, it certainly does explain a lot. “Halacha (Jewish law) does define when a fetus becomes a nefesh (person). “…a baby…becomes a full-fledged human being when the head emerges from the womb. Before then, the fetus is considered a ‘partial life.’ ” [2] These are the particular political views one must “grow” into as a justice and are the accepted kosher litmus test given by the Israeli-American media for any up-and-coming member of the “Supremes.”

But I digress. This exegesis of the above article is not about abortion or homosexuality or even the legalistic sham that is Sandra Day O’Connor. This whole discussion in my opinion comes down to one thing. It comes down to the agenda that is being pushed, and who exactly is pushing it. The fact that my research on James Weinstein reveals him as being something of a libertarian or a Constitutional absolutist on free speech could be slightly heartening, but honestly, the same could be said of Alan Dershowitz of Harvard. The fact that Dershowitz does not support Holocaust denial laws in principle has not kept him from attempting to squelch freedom of speech and freedom of inquiry in other ways, such as his unconscionable attacks on Norman Finkelstein and Dershowitz’ efforts to get DePaul University to deny tenor to Finkelstein. But this certainly says nothing about Mr. Weinstein’s credibility or lack thereof.

But I do suspect, and I don’t believe my alarm is misplaced, that this forum will be used as a springboard to push American law in the direction of European law. O’Connor and her leftist compatriots have in the past tried to use European constitutions and European precedent to shove the Supreme Court in a leftist direction. The court’s two premier left-wingers, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both Jewish I might add, have repeatedly cited the decisions of socialist countries in Europe as a justification for reading their own radical bias into the US Constitution. When they talk about an “evolving” document or a “living Constitution”, all Americans with an IQ above room temperature should be wary.

I also have other fears. Like so many other ADL schemes, B’nai B’rith seems to have their hands in every pie of consequence lately. Just because this forum is being presented under the auspices of both the Faculty of Law at Cambridge and O’Connor’s College of Law in Arizona, there is no reason to believe that radical and polemical Jewish interest groups are not also covertly orchestrating and easing this event in the direction of their own monolithic agenda. ADL is a worldwide criminal band of racketeering gangsters, intent on nothing but wholistic control and dominance, throwing their weight around at will, like an outlaw gang in the Old West who instead of sporting six-shooters, uses grotesque amounts of capital and law degrees from NYU and Columbia to frighten their victims.

When you read a paragraph stating “Topics to be covered include: Incitement to racial and religious hatred, the veil controversies, Holocaust denial, the glorification of terrorism, media regulation and self-restraint, and religious speech that offends secular values,” I think it’s time to get a little suspicious. I also think it might be time to follow the money trail. Chances are good that the path will lead you straight to the vipers’ nest, that interconnected network of Zionist powerbrokers who leave nothing to chance and who are always intent upon pulling the strings behind the scenes. Like their promotion of a “Department of Peace” or a government agency designed to monitor “Global Anti-Semitism”, I doubt that this upcoming conference won’t also have their filthy criminal fingerprints all over it. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, you’re probably a Zionist Jew.

[1] http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/news/dp/2007041303
[2] http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_abor.htm
“Ask the Rabbi: Abortion - Yes or No,” at: http://www.aish.com/rabbi/ATR_browse.asp?l=A&offset=1

By Patrick Grimm

It’s time to rip away the false front which the Zionists hide behind.

It’s time to shred the numerous guises which Zionists utilize, in true chameleon fashion, to confuse a benighted public.

It’s time to stop the spilling of blood caused by the Zionist control of America’s foreign policy.

It’s time to stop slaughtering Israel’s enemies and then declaring that it is in “America’s best interests.”

It’s time to stop electing presidents who are literally marionettes on strings, strings pulled by Zionist puppetmasters like Wolfowitz and Perle.

It’s time to reform the financing of campaigns, thereby cutting off the source of Zionist power: money.

It’s time to scrap the Federal Reserve and the Zionist control of our economy and our money supply by greedy Jews.

It’s time for Gentiles to stop buying pornography and supporting the Jewish-run pornography industry.

It’s time for the Christian church in general, and the evangelical Christian church in particular, to stop lending a helping hand to the very Jews who are erasing our religious heritage.

It’s time to say ‘no’ to Jewish-led multiculturalism, diversity and sensitivity training and other movements which only serve to fracture our society.

It’s time to slam the borders shut and put an immediate end to a Jewish and Zionist-led invasion which only serves the interests of the moneyed elite.

It’s time to investigate, try and lock up the Zionist Jew powerbrokers of the ADL and AIPAC as treasonous agents of a foreign and hostile power.

It’s time for Christian ministers to speak out, loudly, forcefully and prophetically against evil Jewish leadership.

It’s time to take our sick, anti-white, anti-Christian media back from “the people of the lie.”

It’s time to demand that jailed Holocaust historians who veered from the Jewish line be immediately released from prison and also be financially compensated out of Jewish coffers.

It’s time to spit in the faces of the Christophobic little Jewish Zionist tyrants like Abraham Foxman and Elie Wiesel.

It’s time to tell the Holocaust Industry to either put up or shut up.

It’s time to shut down every guilt-peddling, white Christian-hating Holocaust freak show museum in America.

It’s time to tell the Jews who run the homosexual mafia in the United States to stop propagandizing and indoctrinating our innocent children, even if we have to file sexual harrassment, pederasty or pedophilia charges against these perverts masquerading as educators.

It’s time to counter the lies and hatred being directed against our Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, and then it’s time to call the liars out onto the carpet to identify themselves as the Talmudic Jews that they really are.

It’s time to defund and deball Israel, fiscally and militarily, pulling the American welfare teat from their Hebrew lips.

It’s time to expose Zionism as a worldwide disease, a cancer eating away at every civilization, every heritage and every culture.

It’s time to stop letting Zionist Jews pit one group of Americans against another.

It’s time to expose the racist, hateful, anti-Gentile, anti-Christian nature of the Babylonian Jewish Talmud and the religion of Judaism.

It’s time to find out exactly how deeply and intricately involved Israel and Zionists were in the 9/11 attacks on America.

It’s time to start listing the names of politicians who are on the Zionist payroll and then voting them out of office, whether they are Republicans, Democrats or independents.

It’s time to realize that Jewish supremacists want to wipe white people from the face of planet Earth.

It’s time to take that lump out of your throat when discussing everything ‘Jewish’.

It’s time to stop feeling guilty for thousands of years of “Jewish poisecution” and start talking instead about past and present Jewish criminality.

It’s time you figure out that this is a war, a war declared thousands of years ago by the “Chosen” and waged by Jews against the rest of humanity.

It’s time for our people to have an awakening to the Jewish Question, and that awakening happens RIGHT NOW.

It’s time……….

By Patrick Grimm

The jewsmedia is at it again, and why not? They are good at it, used to getting away with it and not at all scared of getting called on it. What is ‘it’, you might ask? Enforcing a racial double standard? Yeah, but that’s not ‘it’. That is too obvious of a topic to even discuss. We know the Jewish media filth were quite overjoyed with the recent suspending of Don Imus for relatively innocuous comments about our always victimized black friends, mainly because the ADL has been gunning for him ever since he went after “thieving Jews” and anti-Christian Jews whom he knew personally. Could it be the fact that the jewsmedia have covered up for and colluded with the black trash welfare community in America by concealing perhaps the worst racist hate crime in the history of this country, that being the rape, sodomy, mutilation and murder of two white college students, Channon Christian and her boyfriend Christopher Newsom by five 75-IQ blacks (and I’m being generous here) who have been raised in probably a Jew-owned ghetto slum run by a Jewish slum lord, with a steady dosage of rabid anti-white propaganda from the Jewish idiot box? Nah, again that is completely predictable.

What is ‘it’ then? The ‘it’ is always the same. The ‘it’ is the old Jewish war against the white race. The fact that Jews and their jewsmedia stand in the corner of black trash, welfare-collecting, drug-addled, illiterate criminal degenerates should not be astonishing to us. Most Jewish supremacists hate black people, and look at them as little better than jungle savages, barely higher than loin-cloth wearing spear throwers, and those blacks who are smarter than their inner city brethren rightly see extremist Jews as bloodsuckers on the Afro-American community. But the two groups, at least the hateful members of each group, both excel at one thing.

What is the one thing that ties Jewish supremacists and black racists together? It’s quite simple really. Both groups love tearing down things that other people have built. And we see it every single day, don’t we? There is only one difference between Jewish perfidy and black perfidy. The Jews, at least the hateful ones, do it with their brains. The blacks, the craven and white-hating ones, do it with their brawn. Jews as a group have been called many things, but never dumb. Blacks as a group have also been called many things, but never particularly intelligent. It is understandable to me that supremacist Jews would attach themselves–like a tapeworm attaches itself to an intestinal wall or a leech attaches itself to a gaping sore–to the black community.

And down come the Gentiles’ institutions once the always overreaching Jews arrive on the scene. They have purloined and degraded almost everything we have built up in America.

Edison created the technology for movies and television, and the Ashkenazi Jew has torn it down, used it as an instrument of destruction against the very race who gave it as a benevolent gift unto the world with a steady stream of perverse amusements and bemusements. Universities founded, funded and created by Christians are now used by the Jew as a weapon of mass indoctrination, teaching white kids to hate their own heritage, their own culture, their own religion and indeed their own country. The literary establishment, once rife with the names of great Gentiles, who composed the most ingenious literary works Americans had ever read, is now dominated by a left-leaning Jewish intelligentsia glorifying drugs, perversion, subversive fever swamp leftisms of every kind and chic anti-Americanism. We have gone from Fitzgerald and Hemingway to Ginsburg and Mailer. Our American military is now seen as as heartless and vile as the most despicable IDF officer as our President justifies torture, and unilateral and random disarmament of any country his finger touches when the globe stops spinning. We are now an annex for Israel and now take part in Israeli-stylized violence, more fluid, far-reaching and gratuitous than even Harvey and Bob Weinstein or a Jewish Hollywood elite could capture on the silver screen. Our blessed United States, once the greatest economic machine on earth, is being hollowed out, degraded and outsourced, while our once solid Euro-American majority is being literally readied for replacement as Jew lobbies work for and cash in on the down payment of our destruction.

The fact that the Jews, an ethnocentrist, indeed racist, group of people, would work with blacks then, should hardly surprise us. They don’t see blacks as equal partners in the ‘Destruction of America Project’ but figure that, what the hey, at least the blacks can do all that mindless wet work that Jewish hands are much too pristine for. I mean, heck, a rabbi probably wouldn’t knife someone in the street (unless he was in Israel and looking for a new liver or something) but a black thug with the IQ of Forrest Gump would be more than happy to rob or stab or rape the white devil. And let’s face it, it’s a good deal for the Jews who have already done all the intellectual heavy lifting, to let semi-literate ghetto denizens keep the disorder up to the fevered pitch it needs to stay at to guarantee that Jewish power stays firmly ensconced. After all, blacks like to destroy things that they didn’t create either. But it’s just never performed or acted out with the same velvet glove finesse that Jewish criminals use to ply their trade.

Is it a coincidence that Jews and blacks are both the biggest recipients of government welfare and American largesse? The Jews, with the help of lobbies possessing almost bottomless pockets, procure about six billion dollars a year from US taxpayers, all to fund their jackboot Zionist racist terror state. Israel’s economy is a socialist basketcase which would collapse without Gentiles infusing it with endless funds. Any criticism of this one-sided little arrangement is called “anti-Semitic.” Blacks, on the other hand (the hand not holding the gun or the needle), are given billions in welfare, so that they can continue to maintain a 70% illegitimate birth rate, commit murder at 12 times the rate of whites and scream “racism!” whenever their infantile demands are not met.

Extremist Jews and racist blacks salivate at the thought of destroying beauty created by others. Why? Because they see in the beautiful creations of white people, something that most of them are incapable of creating. They are like the serial killer who carves up the face of a beauty queen and then sneers “This is what I do to pretty things.”

The pretty, beautiful, comely and lovely handiwork of white people indicts them, shows them what they are devoid of. Hate-filled blacks kill whites because they see what most of them can never be, whether because of genetics or initiative or what have you. They go and trash once picture perfect neighborhoods and the jobs suddenly leave, not because of racism or prejudice or bigotry, but mainly because many blacks are not intellectually equipped to create a well-ordered, clean, orderly and healthy community. If that is an uncomfortable truth for you, so be it. Everything around you attests to its validity. Standards of intelligence, honest behavior and quality workmanship, all measuring sticks attesting to black deficiency must be scrapped, for the simple reason being that blacks either can’t or won’t measure up to them. But that won’t stop them from screaming for more destruction of more standards in particular, or excellence in general.

Jews are just as ready to destroy, but not because they can’t measure up. They don’t want to measure up. They want to control, they want to run the show. They surely don’t want to do the wet work, whether the wet work involves killing white Americans directly or killing Arabs for fun in Iraq or Afghanistan. Target practice on Palestinians, however, is a favorite Jewish pasttime in Israel. The Jewish hatred of beauty is apparent because there is almost nothing but ugliness which gapes and runs like an oozing wound from their offerings of entertainment. Most of them are also incapable of beauty. Nothing is sacred, except the Jewish people, and everything else is open to a good ol’ Yiddish trashing, be it chastity, Christianity, Calvinism, the nuclear family, America or apple pie. Vileness, as vile as their Talmud, is their stock in trade.

Hatred of beauty, and an indirect hatred of white people because of that beauty, animates and motivates Jewish and black extremists (a large percentage of both groups, sadly) and causes both their genocidal rage towards our culture and the subsequent killing off of our people. Blacks use inarticulate stabbings, murders and rapes, while Jews use their power over our communication to cut us down in more deliciously creative ways. They get the weak-minded among the Goyim to fund the killings of other Gentiles in wars. They help the Goyim to abort their own children and then abort their own future with open borders and ‘free’ trade. They kill the beauty of our heritage, our literature and our philosophers through deconstructionism.

For you see, the 75-IQ black may shoot you for your wristwatch, while the 130-IQ Jew may get your son shipped away to die in Iraq for Jewish lies, but the result is still the same. It is the killing, the gradual killing of the beauty our people have brought to fruition in oh so many ways. White European-Americans have wrought so much beauty, have brought so much of excellence to the world, that those full of ugliness, full of envy and full of hate, must kill both the message and the messenger. That is the ‘it’ that they are ‘at’.

By Patrick Grimm

Here is an interesting and lengthy comment I received from a gentlemen named Jack who was politely critical of my work. Following Jack’s words are my own thoughts and criticisms of his well-phrased assertions.

Jack said…

Dear Sir,

Is Zionism the problem, the “bottom-line” if you will, that we must “get” [1] or is Zionism, and it’s attack on the true conservative foundation of America the net result of an underlying factor that one must first consider?

Throughout your posts you describe the assault on Christians from Jewish controlled media, corporations, etc. While I’m in agreement that one can objectively ascertain that the vast majority of this “smut” is indeed the product of Jewish organizations, I have to ask however: Is the Jewish controlled media the root cause of this corruption, or is their an existing foundation that would explain the resulting grotesque products of said Jewish establishments?

Again, concerning the attack on Christianity that you mention often, and using historical reference as the objective grounds for the following question: What was the fundamental cause of first, second and third century Christian persecution known for its extreme inhumane brutality? Was it anti-Christian Roman culture which bred the vary hate that led Roman historian Tacitus to proclaim that Christians “are hated for their abominations” [2] or did a principal factor exist which in turn resulted in Nero’s “refined cruelty” [2] towards the Christian faith? Furthermore, since you bring up the Christian religion in many of your posts, what was the Christian response towards the atrocities of being burnt alive, torn by wild dogs and beheaded for their faith? [2] Anthenagoras of Athens, a first century Christian and philosopher writes in response to Roman injustice against Christians:

for we have learned, not only not to return blow for blow, nor to go to law with those who plunder and rob us, but to those who smite us on one side of the face to offer the other side also, and to those who take away our coat to give likewise our cloak…those who, like us, pray for your government, that you may, as is most equitable, receive the kingdom, son from father, and that your empire may receive increase and addition, all men becoming subject to your sway [3]

Should Anthenagora have instead written scathing political letters against the Roman Empire while using Christianity as an afterthought to his reasoning?

Going back to the subject of Zionism, and in reply to your usage of Christianity, is the basis of Zionism (and every other deplorable thing) simply sin? Is it not sin that leads these Zionist you mention to produce pornography and support homosexuality? Is it not sin that causes people (gentile and Jew alike) to fall into the snares of pornography and homosexuality? Is it not sin that leads a person to believe that blowing up “infidels” will result in glory? Is it not sin that leads a nation against other nations purely out of an act of greed while “pimping” the Christian religion? Is it not sin that controls the misconstrued, perverted reasoning of groups like the ACLU or ADL?

In closing, please understand that I’m not preaching or trying to be “holier than thou”, I’m simply replying to your blog as a Christian, since you mention Christianity in many of your articles. Fortunately, from a Christian perspective, it easy to see the cause of the issues you write about. It is so very simple in its reasoning, yet so logically complete. It is sin. To blame Zionism, for example, as the leading cause of the United States’ problems, my response could simply be, “its not Zionism, its Islamic radicals”, or its not the “Jewish control of a society…” [1], its George Bush’s presidency. One could provide almost infinite arguments from all sides of the political spectrum. The problem logically, is the causality dilemma that occurs when searching for political causes (i.e., Zionism) of the world’s problems, simply due to the fact that there exists, no correct answer. After all “which came first, the chicken or the egg.” No matter how hard one searches, there is no political process, there is no political “truth” [1] or political ideologies or political knowledge that will save this country, much less all of mankind. What is your answer to the salvation of this nation? Awareness of Zionism?! And then what?! The United States magically transforms into a conservative, Anglo-Saxon, Christian utopia free of Jewish rule?! History certainly tells of a different story, simply look at ancient Rome or modern day China for the unjust treatment of Christians! The irony is that you skip around or barely touch on the only Truth (redemption through Jesus Christ) that actually exits while dwelling on issues that are of relative unimportance. Keep in mind that I’m not discounting the importance of political science or other secular studies, I enjoy and have studied them quite thoroughly myself. I am, however, approaching from a Christian intellectual point of view, since, as I have stated numerous times, you mention Christianity throughout many of your articles, which now brings me to my conclusion. Since you agree with and cite Christianity throughout your blogs, and since the root cause, beginning with the Fall, of all of life’s problems from a Biblical standpoint, is sin, wouldn’t that make the only logical truth that we need to “get”, [1] redemption through Christ which therefore is the only rational answer to the problem of Zionism (sin)?

Sources:

[1] http://zionistwatch.blogspot.com/2007/03/do-you-get-it-yet.html [2] Gonzalez, J. The Story of Christianity. P. 27[3] http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/athenagoras-plea.html

[2] Gonzalez, J. The Story of Christianity. P. 27[3] http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/athenagoras-plea.html

[3] http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/athenagoras-plea.html

Jack,

Thank you very much for your thoughtful, but somewhat myopic feedback. I appreciate the time it took you to issue forth a response, though not as specific of a response as I would have liked, to the ideas, assertions and polemical exercises that constitute my humble and unassuming little blogspot entitled Zionist Watch. I sincerely hope that this discourse and dialogue continues in the future, and that we are able to discuss these matters in a spirited, but civil and mutually respectful manner. I want my writing to be iconoclastic and thought-provoking, but I am certainly capable of engaging and conversing with both critics and friends alike. Intellectual queries, questions and even criticisms and friendly attacks are all welcomed here, and are what make Western civilization the smashing success it has been for so many centuries. The pursuit or declaration of truth is a rigorous and unending quest which historically has always ruffled a few feathers.

But enough of my verbal indulgences. Let’s get to the crux of the matter here. You begin your retort to my website (and I do wish you had addressed some of my op-ed pieces a little more specifically, though that never seems to be your intent) by conceding many of my points, and I must say, how could you do otherwise? You know as well as any politically right-leaning Christian out there that the charges I make against organized Jewry in America and indeed in most European nations are essentially beyond dispute. You state clearly that “I’m in agreement that one can objectively ascertain that the vast majority of this ‘smut’ is indeed the product of Jewish organizations.” But of course, Jack. It is here that we have no argument, for you as a thinking American, are surely as chagrined and appalled by the unending flood of perversion, anti-Americanism and anti-Christian hate coming from Jewish entertainment, media and political groups, as I am. But this is where our agreement seems to end, and this is also the place where you lapse into an argumentative style based on self-righteous truisms that no honest Christian could disagree with, but which could also be utilized as “stock answers” for any issue of political or public moment. Though I don’t fault some of your points, they do at times seem contrived, pat and self-indulgent. This is not a shot against you personally, for like you, I too come from a Christian milieu. But I must say with all honesty that your critique of my work is a perfect case study on the fallacies of non sequitur.

Non sequitur -
1. An inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premises or evidence.

“That’s too harsh!” you might protest with indignation, and that is certainly your right as a participant in this hearty little back and forth. But to do so misses my point completely. You address me in your first paragraph in an almost ominous tone, as if you have been informed of some unique knowledge from the Almighty that the rest of us have somehow missed. “Is Zionism the problem, the ‘bottom-line’ if you will, that we must ‘get’ [1] or is Zionism, and it’s attack on the true conservative foundation of America the net result of an underlying factor that one must first consider?” And yet despite the provocative nature of this opening little paragraph teaser, and all the promise that it holds, you add nothing unique to this debate. As Shakespeare penned so ingeniously in Macbeth “It is a tale … full of sound and fury; signifying nothing.” I would tweak the aforementioned quote and say “It is a response … full of sound and fury; signifying nothing original.”

What do I mean? Well, let me give you an example of your reductionist attempts to either neutralize the entire debate over Zionism, or barring that, to somehow place yourself above it with pious platitudes and truisms. Here is one such entry: “Going back to the subject of Zionism, and in reply to your usage of Christianity, is the basis of Zionism (and every other deplorable thing) simply sin? Is it not sin that leads these Zionist you mention to produce pornography and support homosexuality? Is it not sin that causes people (gentile and Jew alike) to fall into the snares of pornography and homosexuality? Is it not sin that leads a person to believe that blowing up ‘infidels’ will result in glory? Is it not sin that leads a nation against other nations purely out of an act of greed while ‘pimping’ the Christian religion? Is it not sin that controls the misconstrued, perverted reasoning of groups like the ACLU or ADL?”

Hmmm, not exactly the discovery of the age, is it? You are surely correct that it is sin which causes these things and any other type of degenerative or soul-destroying behavior. This is a basic tenet of Scripture. But what exactly does this have to do with the merits or demerits of the points I make at Zionist Watch? How does this even begin to serve as adequate criticism of the approach I have taken in confronting and exposing radical Zionism and Jewish supremacist subversion in America? We are all acutely aware that ‘sin is in’ in our society, but you would have to concede that this is true of every society. Again, not exactly the discovery of the age, and obviously not anything as profound and revelatory as you seem to insinuate with the weighty prose you wield to address this obvious fact of reality.

But I suspect that there is a deeper and more profound reason for the types of obfuscation you engage in than a concern about sin. I suspect that you would not employ this obviously disingenuous debating style if the title of my website was ‘Jihad Watch’ or ‘Islam Watch’, would you? You would surmise, and quite accurately surmise, that the only way to fight radical Islamist radicals was to use American intelligence, American know-how and even American military if necessary to stop their attacks upon this nation. You would support closing our borders to the threat of Middle Eastern terror and barring that, you would at least want the FBI to keep a watchful eye on mosques which were suspected of supporting extremist elements in the Islamic religion. You wouldn’t write a piece telling me that all we need to do is somehow convert these wild-eyed radicals to Christ, would you? You wouldn’t say that we need to ignore Muslim terror, take no action against their attacks against us and instead focus on all “sin.” But that is essentially what you have done with the Jewish issue. You want to cover up their obvious sins under the rubric of “sin” on a grandiose and universal scale. That’s intellectually dishonest, though I don’t charge that it is an intentional dishonesty on your part. But you don’t seem capable of taking the blinders off.

But I don’t entirely blame you either, Jack. You, like most Judaized, Zionized American Christians, have been taught to have a reverential, almost worshipful tone when discussing Jews. You have been taught by fundamentalist ministers, many of them well-intentioned men, to be uncritical, indeed fearfully uncritical, when the subject turns to the “Chosen” or the “Chosen’s” activities. You have been brainwashed into believing that the Bible teaches you to never rebuke anti-Christ Jews and their evil works, but the Bible teaches us nothing of the sort. The Bible shows us a radical Christ who prayed “forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.” This was obviously a swipe at the rampant and heartless usury of the Pharisees.

Many of Christ’s other parables convey the same message. And who can forget the big “anti-Semitic” fit he threw when he charged into the temple, overturned the moneychangers’ tables and stated “My house shall be a house of prayer; but you have made it a den of robbers.” Luke 19:45-46. This is only one of countless occasions where Jesus thundered against the Jewish supremacists of His day for their arrogance and greed, or for their racism against the Samaritans or their self-righteous view of themselves as holy and chosen and special. Christ had more charity toward prostitutes and drunkards and sundry other sinners than He ever had for the evil Jewish leadership of His time, and whose lineage of hatred for His words continues to this very day. Are Christians not supposed to follow His perfect example? To do so would mean that they too need to stand against the Jewish elite who have become a “stumbling block.” This was the common view of most ministers throughout history, starting with Martin Luther. This view persisted until about 40 or 50 years ago. Not coincidentally, this was about the time when Jews gained almost total control over America’s media.

What you would never keep silent about were it committed by Islam, abortion clinic bombers, black racist demagogues or what have you, you are all too ready to sweep under the rug if the always innocent, always persecuted “Tribe” is involved. Or at the very least you are ready to cast suspicion on those, like myself, who are concerned mainly about criminality and violations of religious rights being perpetrated on Christians and others by extremist (not all) Jews. It would be akin to a man coming to burn down your church and you insisting that instead of calling the police to nab the arsonist that everyone should try to witness to him as he poured the gasoline.

Edmund Burke said that “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.” I guess that only applies if it is anybody but Jews trying to steal our constitutional and religious freedoms. Yeah, it’s a “touchy” subject for you. It’s a touchy subject for a lot of people. You talk about China and its persecution of Christians. I don’t know about you, sir, but I don’t want to live in China. I don’t want to live in a place like Canada where the Canadian Jewish Congress has shoved through hate crimes legislation over the years which have resulted in the fining or jailing of ministers or clergy who speak out against homosexual sin or Jewish misbehavior. Right this very moment, as you are reading this reply, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is lobbying in the Congress and Senate to pass a hate speech bill which would effectively silence all their critics, starting first with Christians and their “anti-Semitic” New Testament. I suppose since they are Jewish and not Muslim or Hindu or Buddhist, nothing should be said or done about it. It shouldn’t be fought on Constitutional grounds, because, gee whiz, after all it’s just sin and all of us are guilty.

If this is what you are saying, and occasionally I have trouble deciphering whether you are just uncomfortable with my strident tone, or you think that no criticism of world Jewry is ever warranted, then you would basically have to oppose every political movement in history that was guided by Christians and biblical principles, for instance, the anti-slavery movement in the United States and England, or the early suffragettes, who were all Bible-believing, conservative, pro-life women and stood in stark contrast to today’s Jewish-run radical pro-abortion feminist vanguard.

Thankfully, many Christians disagree with your “stand-offish” approach to everything Jewish. Conservative Christian ministers like the Reverend Ted Pike and others are speaking out against the evil Jewish leadership in this country, while at the same time showing the compassion of Christ by witnessing the Gospel to Jewish people. We can do both, you know. But to wish godspeed to Talmudic Judaism, its nefarious network of crime and the terrorist state of Israel that is engaging in an absolute genocide against Palestinians (and read the statements of almost every Israeli prime minister if you don’t believe this fact), is in a word, sin. It is a monumental mistake for Christians and it destroys our witness. Christianity and Zionism are like oil and water. They don’t mix. Bringing them together in some sort of well-financed hackneyed alliance only delivers a death knell to the Gospel message. It is one of countless reasons why Christians are rapidly losing their credibility in the US.

But still you rail on with passages like “No matter how hard one searches, there is no political process, there is no political “truth” [1] or political ideologies or political knowledge that will save this country, much less all of mankind. What is your answer to the salvation of this nation? Awareness of Zionism?! And then what?! The United States magically transforms into a conservative, Anglo-Saxon, Christian utopia free of Jewish rule?!”

Sir, I have never stated anywhere or at any time that the elimination of Jewish or Zionist control of America would result in “a conservative, Anglo-Saxon, Christian utopia.” To infer such an idea indicates that perhaps you are reading things into my work which are not there or that you are simply projecting. You seem to transform into a utopian the minute Jews or Zionism are brought up. Pardon me for not being optimistic about your proposed solutions. To believe that those Jews who hate Jesus Christ, His inclusive teachings of forgiveness and love and who do everything in their power to destroy His holy name in our society, in addition to ripping crosses off of war memorials, banishing any Christian prayers from public schools, making Hollywood films showing His followers as lunatics, criminals, or psychotically insane people, are suddenly going to be open to receiving Him into their hearts, is, to put it mildly, naïve.

I don’t want “a conservative, Anglo-Saxon, Christian utopia” as you word it. I simply want a country where we are masters in our own house and where the values of our Founders are somewhat reflected in our institutions, in our media and in our government. Utopia on earth is not possible apart from the return of our Savior to this planet. I want what every people want. I simply don’t want to be controlled by a foreign entity or a foreign nation (Israel) or by a group with alien values that clash with the traditions this nation was founded on. Not desiring Jewish control of my country is not about hating Jews. It’s about loving freedom and liberty and it is precisely what our forebears strived and bled and died for when they fought against a colonialist power during the Revolutionary War. They fought in order that we wouldn’t be controlled by anyone else. That is all I want, and it is what most Americans want. It doesn’t make a people anti-Semitic to chafe under Jewish domination of both their foreign and domestic affairs, and to desire to remove that parasitic power from atop their collective backs. We have a boot on our throats, figuratively and sometimes literally. You have to see that or you wouldn’t even be reading my work.

But you persist in faulty and literally false allegations when you state “The irony is that you skip around or barely touch on the only Truth (redemption through Jesus Christ) that actually exists while dwelling on issues that are of relative unimportance.” Let me point out a few incorrect factual and logical leaps you make.

First, I have “touch”ed on “the only Truth” in my work. Here is one such excerpt from my most recent article Deconstructing the Jews. “Jews, however, like all peoples, are free to accept the salvation offered by God’s Son, Jesus, given as a gift to the repentant sinner, bought and paid for by His death on the cross and His resurrection on the third day.” Doesn’t get more crystal clear than that, does it, Jack? That in a single sentence, explains the entire Gospel message to the reader, doesn’t it? If you would read my writings more carefully, you would see this. I don’t know if you are just skimming my work or perhaps reading your own prejudices into it, and I won’t pretend to presume either.

Secondly, you are using flawed reasoning and applying it selectively to my site because it suits your purposes. Your purposes seem to be twofold.
1. To protect your own innate and Pavlovian pre-conditioning of avoiding any negative discussion of Jews, Jewish behavior or misbehavior or anything other than glowing praise and adoration inculcated in your psyche by a lifetime of fundamentalist brainwashing.
2. To place yourself as somehow “above” the discussion (though I don’t think you do it intentionally) with supposedly high-minded bromides against sin of a very generalized variety, so as to again avoid discussion of an uncomfortable and taboo topic.

Thirdly, your flawed reasoning is obvious. It’s quite simple. You set up a goal or purpose - i.e. pointing people towards Jesus Christ - and apply it at random to whatever object you choose to relate it to. Think about it this way. Let’s just imagine you were a business major and you are taking an economics class. The fact that you chastise my blogspot for not being evangelistic enough would be like me walking up to your economics professor and saying “Why do you talk so much about economists like John Maynard Keynes and Adam Smith and John Kenneth Galbraith? Why aren’t you telling your students about the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and urging them to accept Christ as their Savior?” The economics professor would probably look at me like I had lost it and say “Well this is an economics class. We don’t delve into religion here, Christianity or otherwise.”

Here’s another example for you, Jack. Let’s just propose that you join the Republican Party as a recruiter for the Young Republicans. You then proceed to go into neighborhoods, door to door and witness to people the truth of Jesus Christ and the salvation found through faith in Him and lead several people to Christ. Later you come back to your local Republican Party headquarters and they ask you how many new Republicans you have registered for the party. You retort “I didn’t make any new Republicans, but I told a lot of people about Jesus.” I don’t have to tell you that you probably wouldn’t have your job for too long after that.

There is one simple rule you need to remember. It is an elementary tool of reasoning that will assist you in every area of life and I am probably not the first person to say it. Everything fails by irrelevant standards. Let me say it again in different words. Everything in life will fail the test when you apply irrelevant standards to it. It would be like saying “My cook book doesn’t really teach a moral lesson.” It’s not supposed to teach you anything but how to concoct tasty dishes. It’s like complaining to a mechanic that he hasn’t brushed up on the finer points of the Hippocratic Oath or Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. It’s irrelevant.

Zionist Watch is a political website. http://townhall.com/ is a political website, though much bigger and better financed. You wouldn’t proceed to Town Hall and chastise them for their indifference to spreading the Gospel message, would you? Of course you wouldn’t. So why do you insist on applying “irrelevant standards” to a political site devoted to Zionism which you would never apply to a political site devoted to any other topic of interest? I think the answer is obvious. You are so discomfited by its subject matter. You are disconcerted by uncomfortable truths that you wish to avoid dealing with or thinking about. Zionist Watch, though written by a Christian, is not a virtual online church, a Christian apologetics resource or a religious not-for-profit organization. There are many fine outlets for those subjects, but this is not one of them.

In closing, Jack, I would like to thank you for your feedback and input and I do hope to hear from you again. If you feel at all insulted by my response, please know that this was never my intention. I only wish to explain myself, to give a reason for writing the things that I write and perhaps clear up any confusion that might arise in the minds of the modest number of readers who frequent this site. I will continue, without apology, to expose the truth about the world’s most virulent supremacism and its threat to the entire world. As Martin Luther, the great Protestant reformer boldly stated “Here I stand. I can do no other.” May we all be unafraid to stand for what is right, noble and good.

By Patrick Grimm

If our French Sephardic Jewish friend, ol’ Jacques Derrida can do it, so can I. Don’t you love deconstruction? It gets me warm and appreciative for all the intoxicating unguents that the Jews have delivered to salve the wounds of a white European “sick” mindset in dire need of hubristic Hebrew medical assistance. They are here to save us, don’t you know? They are determined to be a “light unto the nations” no matter how much darkness we have to wallow in as a result of what they would see as their own divine illumination. The Jews want to apply the “balm” of Freudianism, of post-structuralism, of Marxian literary theorizing and gay and lesbian liberation and all the rest.

One writer online, and I apologize for not recalling his name, stated that the whole “light unto the nations” rubbish uttered like rote by religious Jews was not just incorrect in real empirical, proveable and observable results. It is false advertising, plain and simple. It is a malignant guise, a charade concealing the baleful and woeful tangibility of Jewish, and mostly Talmudically Jewish bad faith towards the Gentile world. How could it be otherwise? It’s like asking ‘what came first, the chicken or the egg?’ I would hazard a guess, however, that many religious folk always tend to want to posit the benefit of the doubt towards questionable movements. But are we to believe that Jews as a group, a high mobilized, galvanized and organized social entity came with good intentions, but somewhere along the line lost their way?

Perhaps there were Jews throughout history who sincerely did want justice, peace and benevolent benefit for those who were not a part of the in-group, and yes, we do see some of those Jews today, who work tirelessly against the chauvinism, the churlishness and the in-group bigotry of their more adequately-funded and more politically powerful brethren. Israel Shahak, Israel Shamir, Philip Weiss and Michael Hoffman spring readily to mind. These Jews should be lauded, indeed praised by “awakened” Gentiles. But it seems to me naive to give carte blanche to the entire “tribe” on account of those good apples scattered throughout the bad barrel of world Jewry.

If the Jews were commanded to be a separated remnant of humanity, to bring light and peace and social justice (and I am not going to unpack those terms, or my exegesis of those terms for you in this article) unto the nations, why do we see so little of that light, but so much darkness and decadence and degradation with a Jewish surname slapped on the end of it? Some individuals may retort “You can’t have the rose without the thorns,” but that misses the point. From where I stand, I don’t spy the rose alongside the thorns, but a thicket of thorn bushes doing nothing but crowding out the roses and every other flower of beauty. And those flowers can be similes or metaphors or what have you for aesthetic, spiritual or societal healthiness.

But followers of Christ will retort “What about the Ten Commandments or the teachings of Jesus Christ, who himself was Jewish?” The Ten Commandments are indeed purposeful guideposts for proper living, but they were not recorded as universal rules of conduct for all people. Properly understood, the Ten Commandments were meant to apply to Israelites and Israelites only. “Thou shalt not kill your Jewish brother” or “Thou shalt not steal from your fellow Jew” would be the way in which they are understood by the Orthodox of contemporary times, though as always, there are notable exceptions to this chauvinistic reading amongst contemporary rabbis like anti-Zionist Dovid Weiss. But by and large, the Torah’s Commandments were and are applied to Jews, and do not apply to the treatment of Gentile or non-Jewish neighbors and acquaintances. Whether this was God-ordained or not, I am not going to debate, for though I have studied the Bible along with other religious texts, I am not a religious scholar. It was only with the advent of Christianity that the Ten Commandments were universalized, as all of Christ’s teachings were, to be applicable to all players in the human drama.

Relating to the second part of most knee-jerk Christian fundamentalist arguments, it also makes no sense to credit Jews as a whole for the teachings of Jesus Christ, any more than it makes sense to use terms like “Judeo-Christian” to foster inclusion in America. The philosophy of Christ is, in a word, “anathema” to Judaism. His ideas, His words and His actions while on earth, were seen, and seen rightly as an enemy to organized Jewry and the antithesis of its atmosphere of exclusion and localized xenophobia. Hence, you witness the phenomenon of present-day Jewish scholars branding the New Testament of the Holy Bible as “anti-Semitic.” They couldn’t be more correct in their assumption, if one uses their own definition of “anti-Semitic” as an individual or entity that is “against” Jewry.

The New Testament warns us over and over again about the dangers of the unrepentant and stiff-necked Jews who are the enemies of the Gospel of Christ. Jews, however, like all peoples, are free to accept the salvation offered by God’s Son, Jesus, given as a gift to the repentant sinner, bought and paid for by His death on the cross and His resurrection on the third day. But to confuse the masses by hyphenating Judaism and Christianity as if they are fighting brothers-in-arms is a monstrous and horrible lie, fostered and encouraged by Zionists to ally Christians with the devilish forces of both secular and Talmudic Jewish enemies of the Savior. If Christianity is a Jewish movement (which it demonstrably is not) then we would not have seen a 2000 year war waged against it by Jews of every ideological stripe. Christianity is an unguent against the scourge of Jewish racism, and cannot be understood as anything else. The Jews know this better than most followers of Christ. There is no “Judeo-Christianity” any more than there is a “Satanic-Christianity”. Today’s brand of Judaism is a sickening stew of racism, anti-Christ paranoia, black magic, occultism (Kabbala), a worshipful wallowing in victimhood (Holocaustianity) and a pompous and priggish chutzpah-laden self-worship that is nauseating in its unapologetic brazenness.

But the misled (or misleading) Jews, and their afficianados, continue to wax poetic about the altruistic Jewish concern for justice, for the underdog, and for peace and good will. It’s time to deconstruct those lies, like an inverted, unmyopic and clear-eyed Derrida (one which doesn’t exist) determined to deal a death blow to the fallacious theological frauds which pass for truisms in a Jewish-controlled world. Deconstructing Jewish claims of moral and intellectual purity and their “light unto the nations” smokescreen is a task all of us must take on, ripping away the false front from their indulgently pietistic self-promotion.

The “light” they have wrought is as dark as the religion their holy men wax poetic about. The “light” of the Jews is the bright glorifying illumining they have lent to every sickness of the spirit, every soul-destroying tendency that grips and rips apart the very roots of our heritage and history. It could be homosexual perversion they choose to glorify, it could be something as simple as the deification of wealth, ostentatiousness and avaricious business practices, or as complicated as a Herbert Marcusian socialistic coupling of the un-truisms of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. It’s a matter of the cure being worse than the disease. Or perhaps the “cure” is the disease. Either way, the remedy is always the same. The remedy is the truth, simply spoken, forcefully proclaimed and properly applied. Derrida probably wouldn’t have agreed, but perhaps, just perchance, he might have eventually understood.

By Patrick Grimm

I’m asking, but I’m not asking nicely. I’m speaking in a voice sounding much like Jack Bauer screaming into a cell phone “Call it off!” No, I’m not asking at all. I am going to have to insist this time. Sings sarcastically the words of an old big band standard (and I am a good singer) “Let’s call the whole thing off!”

But you won’t, will you? You Zionist stooges, charlatans, snake oil salesmen, oh and saleswomen too, yeah every one of you filthy, conniving, lecherous, money-grubbing, Mammon-worshipping, perversion-promoting, porn-pushing pieces of human garbage, I’m talking to you. I think that narrows down “The Tribe” enough to include a few million of you so-called “Chosen” who just can’t wait to screw the goyim and bring it all down around our heads. I know sure as there is a hell waiting for Elie Wiesel, Abe Foxman and Alan Dershowitz, that you sick Jewish supremacists will not stop the war against us Gentiles. It won’t happen. You didn’t learn a thing, did you? As Mark Glenn, a courageous writer on http://crescentandcross.com stated so succinctly, attempting to warn extremist Jews away from the destructive path they have been on for thousands of years “Now, if you will abandon this mindset, then the current state of war between us and you will cease to exist, and there will be peace…” [1] But there’s no chance of that, is there, Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Defense League, American Jewish Congress, ACL-Jew, World Congress of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Jewish Organizations or whatever other monikers you use to spread your social decay? Nah, you love the decay and the perversion and the scatological sickness and the Hollywood blood and guts and America-drowning, Christianity-soiling filth that you have flung upon the public, all in the name of entertainment, art and a wheelbarrow full of Ben Franklins. You are getting big, rich and happy, sitting in your gated communities and laughing at the numbskulls who think you Jews are the gods of America.

As Merle Haggard asked presciently “Are the good times really gone for good?” Yeah, they seem to be. Now it’s more crimes, more lies from our government and thanks to the US support of Israel, America is the second most hated country on earth. Of course, Israel, the most putrid treasonous nation to ever be stolen out of whole cloth still clocks in at a big number one. In the eyes of the world, thanks to you Jewish Zionist traitors and you Christian Zionist whores who bend over and take it from the “Chosen” for bribes and Lear jets, America stands for nothing but porn, scorn, torture, lies and a permanent war state. It stands for the disease of hard-core pornography (and I’m no prude) gushing into every corner of the world like a shattered sewage pipe broken wide open. It stands for people like former Clintonista ultra-liberal Zionist shill for Israel, Dan Glickman, a dirty Jewish bottom feeder if there ever was one, taking over the Motion Picture Association of America to push for more NC-17 films. As if the swill the Hollywood Jews are concocting, writing and dredging up out of their personal lives as parasitic leeches of Gentile largesse, is not horrid enough. No, thanks to Glickman and other Jewish basketcases like him, Hollywood will be further devaluing, devolving and destroying our culture, dragging us down into the gutter that these alien Judeophiles seem to make their home. Apparently, the fact that Israel is the white sex slave capital of the world is not good enough for supremacist racist insane Jews like Glickman and his ilk. The fact that crazed Jews run the child porn industry in every corner of this forsaken planet is still not an adequate enough depravity. No, Glickman and the rest want more twisted sexuality, more transexual abnormality in America, and then bestiality and probably necrophilia, to boot. It’s enough to make Peter Singer get hot and bothered, isn’t it, Danny?

Call it off! Call the whole thing off! But you won’t. The war continues. It’s the same old war with some fresh new players, this time agitating for more death to your ancient biblical enemies, and let’s face it, you people have had nothing but enemies throughout history, regardless of how sweet and kind the ignorant, unknowing Christian populations, those foolish enough to let you into their gates, have treated you. All they asked for was mutual respect, but you only wanted an endless battle, didn’t you? You only wanted discord, trickery and chicanery. Jacob tricked Esau out of his birthright and his blessing, and you have been stealing both from the Goyim ever since. You don’t know when to call it quits. And why not? It seems to be that you are the only criminal gang who has ever gotten their hands into the history books to rewrite or erase any inconvenient facts about your unruly schemes and your problems with people skills. No, we don’t want to die for you. We don’t want to kill Iranians for you, just because you say “Never forgive!” But Feith and Kristol and Horowitz and Cohen don’t see it that way. They would rather wash the planet in blood with their falsehoods and their evil propaganda. Your Zionist machine will never call this off.

Nope, you’ll keep a steady flood of pro-homosexual, anti-family indoctrination churning out on the old Jew tube. You’ll use your control of both the left and right-wing media to agitate for murder and mayhem and eventual anarchy, which you will help unleash onto God’s grieved earth. You will lie about your favorite criminal state of Israel as it decimates America and isolates this once great republic from the company of other nation-states, if you can’t divide and conquer all those with more Third World immigration that you will fund, embrace and promote on the six o’ clock news. You’ll keep kidnapping and raping white blonde-haired, blue-eyed European women and dragging them to the best little whorehouse in the Middle East. You will even professionally and personally defame and slander the decent Jews who dare to speak out against your vile agenda. I would tell all you Jewish extremists to go to hell, but hell itself would probably vomit you back out in disgust. It’s too good a place for you. (Plus, I don’t think they have catered meals there.) If any of you ever looked at yourselves, really made an honest assessment of the raping you have given humanity, you would probably drown in an endless ocean of blood.

So once more for the record. Call it off! Call the whole thing off! But you won’t, you can’t. For to do so, you would have to give up your intrinsically evil nature, your reliable Gentile cash cow and your backward and archaic view of yourselves as special, as better, as somehow exquisitely superior. I have beseeched you. I have even reasoned with you, if you are capable of such high-minded concepts. But you aren’t capable of anything but criminality, parasitism and greed. You are Mammonites, plain and simple, and nothing I say will even make one millimeter of a dent upon your sin-drenched psyches. All I can do, along with my fellow anti-Zionists, is to fight against your disease, the spreading rot of international Zionism that eats like an acid at our foundations. No, you will not call it off, but guess what? We are going to bring it on. Let me introduce every one of you Jewish supremacist antagonists of mankind to a brand new concept. It’s call truth. Only this time you aren’t going to be able to lie it away, buy it off or kill it gulag-style. This is a new day and a new dawn. Oh, I know the truth is going to hurt. All I can say is, get used to it. We aren’t going anywhere.

[1] http://crescentandcross.wordpress.com/