Zionist Watch: The Writings of Patrick Grimm

The carefully laid foundations of the egalitarian, multicultural, multiracial, double-minded Jewish and Zionist society that replaced our Euro-American one are slowly crumbling, splintering from within. The very intelligentsia that the supremacists believe they had sewn up is breaking open and the truth is flooding forth. Every day and in every way we may not be getting better and better, but in some ways we are waxing more honest, or at least more forthright. The lies that this country has been bewitched by for so long are losing their shimmer and glow and are now being seen for the damnable prevarications they really are.

Dr. James Watson, the lauded scientist who unlocked DNA, has now spoken aloud what many people have known for centuries. There are racial differences in IQ that explain the African continent’s economic failure, social disintegration, rampant disease, chaos and record-setting rape and murder statistics. The black/white IQ gap has been laid on the table for the first time in probably 50 years. Watson back-peddled a mite, but his views were seconded by an African writer named Idang Alibi, who lamented his race’s predicament, which he believes is brought on by lower intelligence and initiative.

Professor Richard Dawkins, the respected British evolutionary scientist said in fairly de facto terms that Jews “more or less monopolize American foreign policy.” He was called an “anti-Semite” by the Foxman brigade, but has not recanted, at least as far as I know.

And finally, who can forget the bulwark book of the new America First foreign policy revival, Walt and Mearsheimer’s The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, confirming what many of my fellow activists have been repeating ad nauseam for years and years.

Yes, there is a groundswell of truth-telling overtaking this intellectually hibernating nation and the facts are rising like cream to the top. The internet is emancipating us, helping us to see that the mental malaise of myths this country has been guided by for the last 40 years could be lifting, leaving behind a new Enlightenment guided by logic, sobriety and facts, rather than feelings, hand-wringing and feigned good intentions. It signifies a move, however slight, away from the shibboleths of the Jewish ethos and the Zionist grails of greed, deception and political correctness. It is a slow turning away from ego-fondling “expressive individualism” that elevates feelings above all else, to a kind of timid and gradual thirsting for honesty and virtue, data and inquiry, despite the discomfort of the sometimes ugly truth. Maybe I am too optimistic (something I’ve rarely been accused of) over these positive signs, but something is happening, an awakening perchance. A political sea change is afoot and whatever one might call it, it ain’t a bad thing. In fact, this could be the start of something BIG.

By Patrick Grimm

Halle Berry’s harmless remarks made on Jay Leno’s program about her “Jewish cousin”, noting the preponderance of prominent facial protuberances amongst our Jewish friends, has apparently gotten her into trouble, or at least worried enough about her career and her disfavor in the eyes of the Jew gods of entertainment and circus freak shows, that she has tearfully and promptly prostrated herself to avoid the torrents of opprobrium which would fall, very unlike Portia’s merciful “gentle rain from heaven” if she remains silent about her trespasses into the terrain of audible and visual reality. No, there is nothing merciful about a Jew America, nothing forgiving or forgetting or relenting.

I mean, gee whiz, the lovely Halle might even be a closet “anti-Semite”, someone undeserving of even having a career anymore. And like the Soviet state of yore, her Leno dialogue has been rewritten, the word “Jewish” actually cut from the final broadcast which aired recently. Of course, history does have to be rewritten and edited to the tastes of the totalitarians, discomfiting fragments left on the cutting room floor, the killing floor of the antifascist kosher slaughter house of historical memory and record.

One Jewish columnist characterized Ms. Berry’s off-the-cuff jocularity as “anti-Semitic”, even “racist”, much as jokes about homosexual proclivities, dress or mannerisms are bitchily smacked down on the airwaves as intrinsically “homophobic” or at least revealing a latent and gradually fermenting “homophobia” which could be concealing a seething hatred and desire for violence against gays or lesbians. Yet, a little bit of racially-tinged humor is permitted in America, a little light-hearted needling of homosexuals is allowed to pass without much hell being raised about it. Not so when the subject turns to the specially Chosen sectarians who can barely restrain the glee they feel about how much power they now possess. Backlash be damned, these power mongers are going to blow their own horns in Vanity Fair, loud and proud and as tone-deaf as they’ve ever been. Of course, the only people paying attention are other Jews and those tuned in to the nature of the Jewish conspiratorial plunder taking place.

This brings me to the subject of this friendly and sometimes irascible little offering to you, the reader. The topic is widgets. What is a widget? The dictionary I use online says in the second definition, the more important of the two, that a widget is “An unnamed or hypothetical manufactured article.” In other words, the answer to the question “What is a widget?” is essentially “Nothing at all!” The word ‘widget’ basically has no meaning, but is only used to signify something, especially if a speaker is discussing economics or production. Another definition is even more enlightening: “Something unspecified whose name is either forgotten or not known.” Or better yet, a widget is “A meta-thing. Used to stand for a real object in didactic examples.”

So we have Halle Berry, only trying to be humorous and delightful on the Tonight Show, tossing off a barb about her photo-shopped pics of herself, one of them sporting a shnoz reminiscent of our humility-impaired brothers and sisters. And a Jew, a columnist, jumps hopscotch-like to the inevitable taint of “anti-Semitism.” He was probably even unaware that one of Berry’s Jewish handlers, a mature Jew capable of laughing at himself (which is a sign of maturity) actually suggested the joke as something she could use in her conversation with Leno.

With this media escapade, made so by the internet hubbub flittering around it, we can see that “anti-Semitism” is “an unnamed or hypothetical manufactured article”!! The “anti-Semite” or the label of “anti-Semitism” is the widget of the Western world. It is “a meta-thing” all inclusive of ANYTHING the Jews don’t want people to note about themselves. “Anti-Semitism” is the widget of the English language, an all-inclusive, all-invasive, all-enslaving, virtual shut-up word. It can end any conversation, nullify and neutralize any argument, no matter how rock-solid logically and factually, and turn the bravest of men into weak-kneed, lily-livered supplicating chumps ready to dole out financial gifts to Zionist charities and Talmudic synagogues.

“Anti-Semitism” has no definition, it is “unnamed” and undefinable, it is a speculative exercise in smear and casts aspersions on the “hypothetical” thoughts in men’s (and women’s) minds and hearts, and it is “manufactured” in the Jewish media, fed and fattened on the Hebrew silver screen and its thirst is slaked only by the body count of victims it piles up.

Over the last fifty years, the widget of the Western world has amassed a Gentile black list that would have made Lazar Kaganovich give up mass murdering Goyim and start writing blurbs for Commentary magazine. Halle Berry is just the latest and most prominent person to get her mind repieced and reprogrammed on the widget assembly line of studio-created Jewish “public opinion.” Of course, like most celebrities, she was ever cowardly and ready to comply, thus reinforcing the Jewish lock on our language and our lingo, the boundaries ever constant and unbreakable.

With every supplication, the indefinability of the “widget” grows, its mystique increases among the simplistic and the “plea bargaining” might of Big Jewry snowballs until none dare challenge its capacity for crushing its critics, both the eruditely thoughtful and the pedestrian. None will dare challenge those for whom any apology from their critics, no matter how much worship is demanded of them, is a foregone conclusion.

But as Dr. Hesham Tellawi noted at the No More Wars For Israel conference, we must destroy the words “anti-Semitism.” We must ram a big stake through this amorphous and ever-moldable epithet if ever we hope to prevail. We must, quite simply, discontinue production and smash the Zionist production companies who manufacture the widget of the Western world.

What is at stake is beauty. Why do we not wish for a Judaized world? Simple. Because it is a world devoid of beauty, yet rife with soulless consumerism and slave workers grinding away on a global plantation, an international gulag run by our moneyed masters. A Judaized world is a world swept clean of higher life, for higher life cannot exist where the dollar is god, where the man with the most shekels is king.

What is at stake is beauty. Yet in a Judaized mindset, womanhood and true feminine qualities like empathy, nurturance and childbirth are devalued, destroyed, made of no effect. No, laboring for the Almighty Dollar is the lord of all, even if it means blotting out family, faith and offspring. Traditional families are mocked and twisted “alternative lifestyles” are portrayed as the paragon of health, the camera lights blotting out the maggot within the apple.

What is at stake is beauty. A Jewish intelligentsia and culture is one where filth, depravity, degeneracy and socialism are celebrated. It is the difference between Dostoevsky and a pulp comic. It is the giant leap backward into a Lord of the Flies milieu, a Jew brainchild where aesthetically pleasing art is quashed and urination, defecation and mockery of God, country and flag reign supreme. It is JEWISHNESS put to the canvas and the page.

What is at stake is beauty. The beauty of our philosophers, of our Golden Rule, our sages, our great authors, poets and musicians, painters and sculptors has been replaced with perversions that defy belief. It means that ugliness is now vogue, the outre is kitschy and slickly chic for those who make it their aim to flaunt what is snidely called “conventional.” The Jewish hate for the comely has caused a broadside of disdain and the deconstructing of standards across the board. We are only seeing the opening act of their very long-running “stage play” of disease and disorder pirouetting its way across our universe, infecting all it touches.

What is at stake is beauty. The Jewish psychopaths and sociopaths who have seized control of us will never be satisfied till they have soiled and debauched, collapsed and caved in all we have built. They will do it with their insatiable bloodlust, their megalomaniacal wars, their endorsement and parading of every kind of sickness in the human soul and spirit. There is no malignancy they will choose not to approve of, no subversive movement they won’t lead and no radical, harmful cause that they will pass on funding and fighting for. They will steal our money, smash our treasures, sell our guarded secrets and make a lie of all our truths. They will gut and turn our religions to their purposes, enlist our very children to bleed for their propaganda, drug our boys till they are feminine and docile and easy to shape. They have made the lovely female body into nothing more than cheap pornography and told us to hate our very history, roots and race. No one has harmed us so much and loved us so little. No one is less deserving of our forgiveness and no one is more arrogant and less likely to ask for it, though the mountain of crimes against us rivals ancient Babel.

What is at stake is beauty and yes, it has been said before, only beauty can save us.

Having read a multitude of books written by authors on both sides of the “Jewish issue” I must say that the plethora of perspectives put forth for consumption are fascinating. Of course, the pro-Jewish, pro-Zionist perspectives are easily available for purchase at your local Barnes & Noble, Borders or Books-A-Million outlets, while those books which dare to put anything but a worshipful spin on Jews, Judaism, Zionism or the Israel Lobby are most likely long since out of print and must be bought from obscure vendors who peddle their wares on the internet, listing the condition of a sought after book as New, Excellent, Good or Fair. The reality that any volumes judged by the Jewish publishing monster as slightly derogatory towards the Chosen and the Chosen’s nation of vulturehood disappear down the Orwellian memory hole should be a flaming bright indicator of who frames the message and who parcels out what is publicly consumed as “truth.”

This brings me to a book I read last year written by neo-conservative Zionist Dennis Prager, a radio polemicist and a self-ordained self-help guru for those who are experiencing any of life’s problems, marital, or otherwise. The fact that Prager is twice divorced doesn’t place a dent in his Hebrew armor nor lessen his credibility as a moral authority in today’s media, where brethren help their fellow brethren. Prager is assisted in his penning of this fatuous guide by Rabbi Joseph Telushkin described on the book jacket as “a rabbi, scholar and spiritual leader” thus taking blow-hardiness to new and ever more Jewish extremes.

The title of the book is Why the Jews? The Reason For Anti-Semitism and purports to lay out a case for why the Jews and only the Jews have been the objects and targets of so much hatred over the last say, 3000 years of history. Of course, without having to peruse too deeply the pages of this Simon and Schuster-published new classic for Zionists and today’s “respectable conservatives” (and I read the book from cover to cover) it soon becomes apparent that Prager and Telushkin have no real interest in understanding how Jews have caused so many problems historically and why most people are not fond of them. In fact, after collapsing the usual “straw man” arguments pinpointed by the shallow-minded as the cause of “anti-Semitism”, economic envy, the “Chosen People” concept, monotheism, etc., the authors really give us little if anything new to chew upon.

But I don’t want to break down and argue all the points made in the book. Why the Jews? as a primer for understanding anti-Jewish sentiments is only as valuable as the authors who wrote it, and both Prager and Telushkin have proven that they have no real curiosity about “anti-Semitism” or in lessening the tensions and in easing the causes of their people’s unique problems on this planet. If they did, they would not only focus on the Gentiles’ opinions about Jews throughout recorded history, but also on the hatred issued forth in the mother’s milk to many Jews who are taught from infancy, supremacy, suspicion and arrogance. Anti-Gentilist and anti-Christian elements within the Talmud and within the entire infrastructure of Judaism would also have to be at best jettisoned, and at the very least, condemned as anachronistic and antiquated ways of dealing with non-Jewish humanity. But no, these two activists will not touch these little stumbling blocks with a ten foot pole. Hence, they can be removed from the arena of ideas, though I do recommend this book if you wish to see the monumental road block set up by Zionists to ever solving the Jew/Gentile rift.

Yet it wasn’t until nearly the end of the book and its supposed denouement (though the ‘eternal question’ is still left wide open) that the sheer unmasked Judeocentric prejudices of the authors are laid bare and bawdy for the reader to behold. I say ‘prejudices’ because the pre-judging had already taken place decades before for this kosher pair, most likely in childhood. Of course, we all have prejudices, but I can honestly say that my prejudices made in favor of Jews have been dashed by a liberal dose of reading, studying and research into this most important and most taboo of human problems.

It’s sad to say, but the same can’t be said for Prager and Telushkin. Their prejudging is always in favor of Jews and any Jews who can be proven to have behaved badly are flung into the convenient category of “non-Jewish Jews.” I take it that Norman Mailer and Allen Ginsberg would be summarily tossed into this pigeonhole, as would any other Jew who could potentially taint the ranks of world Jewry. Gosh, and it’s done so expeditiously, especially when the topic turns to Hollywood Jews, leftist Jews, Communist Jews or the other throngs of Jews who have shaped our world into the aesthetically unpleasing and morally low-brow place it is today. I guess it’s those “non-Jewish Jews” we can blame for this, but guess what, they aren’t Jews after all! We Goyim cattle just got confused by their surnames, their appearances and their hatred for all that is Gentile. Silly us.

Forgive me for digressing there. Dennis Prager and Rabbi Joseph Telushkin sum up their treatise on “anti-Semitism” with the be-all and end-all of Jewish exclusivity and essentialness just as surely as Jewish historians dismiss all history that does not include Jews as either primary players or as hapless and blameless victims. They write:

“Antisemitism is a Jewish problem, but non-Jews make a most self-destructive error when they dismiss it as only the Jews’ problem. For reasons explained in this book, treatment of the Jews has served as one of humanity’s moral barometers. Watch how a nation, religion, or political movement treats Jews, and you have an early and deadly accurate picture of that group’s intentions toward others.” [1]

This is an interesting take on historiography and, not surprisingly, takes the onus off of Jews completely, when dealing with the causes and effects of their “persecution.” In fact, it makes the “nation, religion, or political movement” guilty almost axiomatically. And yes, once more it makes “anti-Semitism” not only the worst of all sins, but the ultimate sin that begets all others that will follow in train, or at least a signpost that reads “THE ANTI-SEMITE IS A MORAL CRIMINAL.”

What Prager and Telushkin have employed is the “canary in the coal mine” view of Jewry. Societies, being Gentile and noxious, only are forewarned of their rapidly approaching moral dissolution when Jews are suddenly and inexplicably persecuted by the politicos, the government, the religions and the majority present in said country. Jews, being the embodiment of a “higher morality” or a “divine presence or calling” are only victimized in a zeitgeist of deteriorated moral standards.

But history does not attest to the truth of the hubristic theorizing of the Jew duo. In fact, most countries who have struggled against organized Jewry have done so for very clear reasons that were agreed upon by society as a whole. The Pale of Settlement established by Czar Catherine the Great in 1791 was not a sign that Russians had become depraved, but was set up to protect Russians from the business practices of Jews, practices that still plague humanity and which provoke anger the world over. Dostoevsky and other authors have written about this in their novels. By 1917, the Pale of Settlement was abolished with the murder of Czar Nicolas and his family by Communist internationalist Jews, who then orchestrated the greatest killing machine of Gentiles the world has ever seen. Yet to Prager and Telushkin, to struggle against Jewry’s aims in Russia or to single out Jews as the cause of the Revolution, would have been a sign of depravity, rather than a natural reaction to tyranny by a tiny minority and the will for survival and self-preservation on the part of the Gentile majority.

No, for the little fragile canary, gauging the amount of methane in the darkest bowels of the human mind and soul, Jewry is always innocent, even of its own worst excesses. If the “canary in the coal mine” doesn’t suffice or explain, then the “devil-made-me-do-it” (Czarist Russia) will just have to do. Dissenters will be damned, for their voices will never be heard anyway, at least not in the schools of “respectable thinking.” By definition, the canary can never be the guilty party. He has nothing to do with guilt or innocence or the danger present. He is always the “test case”, you could even say the “scapegoat” to borrow a Hebrew term, if the analogy is taken into the realm of the political.

I say that Jews masquerading as the canaries of the human family is a fraud and a farce, a hoax larger and more sweeping even than the moralistic tale of good/evil they have foisted upon the world through the Hollywood Holocaust industry. I say that it is more sweeping than the Holocaust story because it (the idea of spotless lamb-like Jewish innocence) has taken over the discipline of history and how it is studied, written about, and finally, told. No, Jewry is not the canary in the coal mine. Its leaders comprise nothing less than a chloroform-drenched cloth forced over the face of the Gentile collective resulting in somnambulism, confusion, and in large doses, death.

Having just returned from the No More Wars For Israel conference several weeks ago, I can attest to the chloroform quality of Jewish political machinations and it has nothing to do with a canary acting as a barometer on our morality. No, it has much more to do with a Jewish media intent on shutting up and shutting down its competitors in the arena of ideas, an arena that Jews believe only includes themselves. Their chloroform has blurred the line between true journalism and advocacy for Jewish group interests, often in conflict with Gentile interests. The Jewish group evolutionary strategy necessitates the killing of the European spirit of America, replacing it with a Jewish ethos that looks and feels strange and unfamiliar because it is. This same ethos has been fought tooth and nail throughout history by the very people that Prager and Telushkin would peg as simple and crude “anti-Semites.”

If Jews truly want to be considered a canary, then perhaps they are a 500-pound one, monopolizing the parlor, sucking up all the air and squawking petulantly whenever its needs are not met. Of course, anyone taking note of the belligerent bird before them snacking down on the resources of everyone else in the vicinity and screeching for still more of what does not belong to it, will be touted as the real threat to pluralism and patriotism, both defined as remaining mute while the behemoth has its way for a few more years and runs everyone else out of the parlor in the process.

Dennis Prager and Rabbi Telushkin are smart men and their book does them a disservice mainly because they are very smart. Both of these individuals obviously know the real reasons for “anti-Semitism” as do most of the Zionist intelligentsia. They would have to be blind, deaf and dumb not to know. But what gets published in Jew-run publishing houses such as Simon and Schuster is “victimhood”, books about “the gifts of the Jews”, and other similar pap.

Learning the real reasons for the Jewish Problem does not concern them and why should it? Understanding an unalloyed historical recounting of the wrongs of Jews would force this Tribe to radically alter their actions, rethink their solipsism and perceived essentiality and dismiss all such notions of innocence (for any group in history) as the poppycock they are. It would also force Jews to behave and to be judged as all other human beings are. Their accomplishments would be praised and their faults (disproportionate to their minute numbers) would be condemned. But little fragile canaries dying for the safety of miners can’t be condemned for anything. This is the contemporary position of Jews, and if present trends are any indication, they are going to be sitting pretty for a long, long time, or at least until someone takes the initiative and decides to bite the poor innocent little canary’s head off.

[1] Prager, Dennis, Telushkin, Joseph. Why the Jews? The Reason For Anti-Semitism. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003.

By Patrick Grimm

Douglas Reed, writing in The Controversy of Zion, recounts the seldom told story of Napoleon Bonaparte’s grappling with the problem of Jewry, or what is frequently called the Diaspora, meaning those Jews dispersed and spread around the world, who were at that time without a nation, having been driven out of Jerusalem many centuries before. Their shady business practices and their reputation of hatred for their many hosts had obviously aroused the suspicions and the ire of those who surrounded them. Reed lays out the narrative of Napoleon’s dilemma:“When Napoleon reached his dizzy peak of power he presumably hoped to do great things for France and the French, as well as for himself (and his family).

Very soon after he became Emperor (or possibly even before) he found that one of the most difficult problems which would confront him was not a French affair at all but an alien one: ‘the Jewish question’! It had racked the lives of the people for centuries; no sooner was the Pope persuaded, and the imperial crown on Napoleon’s head, than it popped up from behind Napoleon’s throne, to harass him.

In Napoleonic manner he took it by the throat and tried to extract an answer from it to the eternal question: did the Jews truly desire to become part of the nation and to live by its law, or did they secretly acknowledge another law which commanded them to destroy and dominate the peoples among whom they dwelt?” [1]

Ah, yes, the “eternal question” posed to the Eternal Jew. It is a question that all of humanity throughout history has grappled and wrestled with, causing much consternation along the way. It may not be as old as recorded history, but it is not unfair to call it ancient. Seeing as how the Jewish Question had “racked the lives of the people for centuries” according to Reed’s recounting, it is hardly shocking that the conundrum of Jewry arose again like a phoenix to tax the minds of the ruling class as well as the common populace. The author’s simple phrase bears repeating once more. “Did the Jews truly desire to become part of the nation and to live by its law, or did they secretly acknowledge another law which commanded them to destroy and dominate the peoples among whom they dwelt?”

If Napoleon were to be resurrected today to survey our world, he would likely be taken aback by the fact that his question, the one posed by so many men of stature throughout the ages, is still an open one, at least in the minds of many, if it is raised at all in any meaningful sense. If a person today is even capable of making an inquiry regarding Jews, which has become more and more difficult to do, at least without inducing hysteria, then he has proven himself to be of an independent and rarefied mind. He, in my opinion, has shown gallant probity and that he is far braver than lesser souls who fall and genuflect before wails of “anti-Semite!”, “Nazi”, or one of my new favorites utilized by an unnamed child-like dunce on the internet, “Judeophobe”, which I find side-splittingly hilarious.

The entire Jewish Question hangs on Reed’s single sentence and will forever plague us unless we reach at least some kind of consensus on it, though an unabridged answer is not possible, for nuance and individual exceptions abound. Yet without lumping all Jews into a monolithic force intent on destruction and domination, I don’t think it is unfair to see the Jewish leadership as acknowledging another law, which commanded, and still commands them to destroy and dominate the peoples among whom they dwell. A semi-informed person, one not even versed in the Talmudist and Zionist movements, would have to be blind to stare at the leading lights of American Jewry (or world Jewry for that matter) and not see the impulse to “destroy and dominate” the Gentile peoples. This is evident in the political causes they support, the espionage they engage in and the crimes of their brethren, generally committed against Goyim, that they condone and cover up in the media.

Are there Jews who don’t want to “destroy and dominate” us? Of course there are. In fact, the statistics tell us that 50% of Jews in the US have married into the Gentile majority. Jewishly-aware social theorists and those who track societal and demographic trends can debate whether this is a good or bad occurrence, but no one can say with any amount of credibility that it signifies hostility. In fact, as Reed states, many Jews throughout history have tried to extricate themselves from the Jewish Question altogether by giving up the destructive creed of their leaders, those leaders who let the Talmud and the Torah be their guide, and instead have embraced assimilation. Of course, to the evil wardens of the “imprisoned” Jewish Diaspora, this induces panic.

But it is worth saying at least once that Jews have been victims of the Jewish supremacist mindset just as Gentiles have. The ghettoization, both mentally and literally, that rabid Judaism brings has been a straight-jacket to the Jewish people. How do we know this? Because so many of them have tried to escape, some successfully, some unsuccessfully. Those who have lived to tell the tale have often been the most effective critics and enemies of Zion.

So the answer to the two-part Reed question is yes/no (some individual Jews) and no/yes (Jewish leadership). Let’s simplify it still further. Yes, many Jews do long for and many have achieved liberation from the destructive creed and do not wish to be part of it. But no, the leadership, Big Jewry, is still in thrall to the destructive creed and pledge obedience to the very canon that will guarantee they will reap only enmity from the Gentile majority. They have also worked at keeping many Jews locked into a mental Warsaw Ghetto, an intellectual Pale of Settlement. Big Jewry desires fear, suspicion, hatred, paranoia and distrust to become permanently implanted in the Jewish mind. They have succeeded in this regard. This has insured and still insures that the cash flow to gangster Jewish political organizations never dries up or runs low and that Israel still gets lots of dollars from wealthy donors who see the socialist state as the last safe haven for Jews in a hostile world of anti-Semites.

But whether an individual Jew can answer ‘yea/nay’ or ‘nay/yea’ to Douglas Reed’s encapsulated Jewish Question is not the main issue. His query, the last third rail still extant, is, as it has always been, the most serious and pressing of our concerns if survival is indeed still imperative. Ignoring it or choosing to remain ignorant of it will not protect anyone from all that it entails. Allow me to paraphrase Lenin when I say: “You may not be interested in the Jewish Question, but the Jewish Question is interested in you.” My friends, the destructive creed of the Torah still lives on, thousands of years of devastation and millions of corpses in its wake. In this sense, the question is closed. “The Jews” are destroying and dominating all nations, making all the Levite “prophecies” get magically fulfilled, just as their concocted desert god promised.

In Hamlet’s Soliloquy, Shakespeare wrote “To be or not to be, that is the question.” It surely is and when it ceases to be so, it will only be because there are no persons left remaining to ask it. The crisis of survival brought on by the Eternal Jew compels an existential dispute that can never be separated from the harbinger who is the cause of the disruption in the first place. Like Napoleon, we must take this controversy by the throat. This is preferable to avoidance, or worse still, indifference to the lateness of the hour and the horrors of inaction.

[1] Reed, Douglas. The Controversy of Zion. Torrance: Noontide Press, 1985.

By Patrick Grimm

The human paraquats of Big Jewry have had their way with this country for too long. One of these toxic agents, Norman Podhoretz, a frothing Straussian, told a throng at a Barnes and Noble bookstore to “Shut up!” when the gathered listeners to the dribbling old curmudgeonly neo-convict’s crusty spiel grew tired and disgusted by his calls to murder millions in Iran, all for the partitioned Paraquat of all Paraquat nations, and the terror overclass in both America and the uncomely beast’s Knesset who wants Eretz Israel sweeping from the Nile to the Euphrates, which is very unlikely. “Of course, it’s all to fight the ‘War On Terror’!” the government-media complex will tell all the lemming luckless lackeys, who are more than ready to believe.

Norman Podhoretz and his archfiend Yiddish enfant terribles in the American neo-conservative cartel, those who have the ear and the balls of the President in a kosher jar, are the only people I know who would have the chutzpah to demand that another country fight their wars and dance the jig of death over their enemies. Of course, we know Israel is the problem, organized Jews are the problem and before the colonialism, state terror and spy ring of Irgun, then Mossad, there was nothing that any of these Judases could even point to and say “Thar blow the winds of Islamofascism!” In fact, the very term “Islamofascism” without a doubt had to have been incubated and crafted by Jewish activists, for the egalitarian and antifascist drumbeat heard in the media issues from no other quarters so consistently and reflexively.

Call it neo-conservative or neo-liberal and it makes no difference. Dr. Tom Sunic has so adroitly pinpointed these Americanisms in his own writings and he is correct that this is our Gospel as a Jewish nation. Egalitarianism drips with the honey poured athwart it, day in and day out, from the Jewish engines of regress in the media, while it is a modern truism that nothing is so repugnant and full of ignominy than “fascism” whatever the unpacking of this inflammatory buzz word means at any given and opportune moment. Hence, Muslims resisting Zionist advances are “fascists” and Walt and Mearsheimer who pen the “poison” and crack open Pandora’s Box on the Jewish Lobby are also potentially flirting with fascism and are “anti-Semitic in result if not in intent” to pluck the phraseology of Jewish Harvard President Larry Summers to the bosom of the issue at hand, which is war without end for a state (Israel) that is not worth in its entirety one drop of American blood to pump sustenance into its eternal criminal Ponzi scheme.

There is only one real hurdle for the Jewish paraquatic par redundancies who shape and shift and solder our politics to meet their always needful wills and whims. Like the Podhoretz B & N lecture disaster to promote a book World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism by a man who has spent a lifetime recalibrating himself at his own convenience, the cattle are chafing, and actually having the first germinations of a thought process that could actually lead somewhere. They are discovering that the beast is not all-powerful or invincible, that the Goliath of Zionism could yet lose its head literally, as we can plainly surmise that its brain matter (ideological cogency, real or imagined) has begun an atrophy, though this may not make it any more innocuous. For like a rabietic dog, madness does not signify inefficacity, especially when the Other (us) is as wholesale in its otherness as the Jews see Gentiles, both Christians and Muslims, in their pecking order and standing on the uneven plane of Talmudic existence.

Americans at their best, are not battle-fatigued when squared off with the right enemy. The enemies we should be fearing are not Muslims, most of whom live in a subsistence that is Third Worldly in most cases and otherworldly to the average sheltered US citizen nursed on the milk of righteous causes and hyper-moralizing, even when the facts are still out and when they will never bear the brunt of their own Puritan impulses, again as Dr. Sunic has noted, which fit hand-in-glove with the aims of Judaism, now hyper-Zionized and self-crowning in its reign of expansionism.

For all of these reasons, America, more than any other nation-state, is ripe for the picking when the numbers for crusades, either moral or militarily imperialistic, are called. That’s why our support and group hug for Israel seems so natural and our bound-at-the-hipness is so cushy and devil-may-care for the elites. American chosenness and Jewish chosenness makes for inevitable intercourse and I think you can guess who got the real screwing when the rogering thrusts reached their cessation, if they have, as of yet, ceased. The question of who will do the post-romp paying is not an open query either.

Yes, Podhoretz and his coterie have had their way with this country for too long and their bilking ilk have stunted the growth of our garden for much longer than Israel has blemished and pocked the green earth. As he and the Straussian smart boys take the masks off and just say “Oh, the hell with it! Of course this thing was about the Israeli killing machine all along!” it will allow the eyes of the multitudes to open, the horror to spread like margarine across the faces of our everymen and everywomen, who finally see the crimes of Zion, perpetrated and perpetuated as much by our Gentile Self-Chosen Puritans as by the neo-Jacobins, the globalists and the rest. If one should wish to look upon the face of terror, war-like and wanton, then perhaps they will see the smile of the aged and decrepit Trotskyites signing autographs at the book bordello and the black hats with buckles worn weightily by the overseers of the “indispensable nation” worked into a moral frenzy yet again over “democracy” and progress that springs eternal once in a while.

By Patrick Grimm

“Jewish divide and conquer still divides. The Jews’ techniques of cooptation and fraudulent alliances of convenience still create the suspicions amongst potential allies and they (Jews) delight in dissolution, rifts, chasms and either/or, all or nothing false dichotomies. When will we unite to smash the Zionist idol, the Judean death cult that threatens, thwarts and kills all human beings regardless of color, creed or ideology? Apparently we still have a long way to go in this regard. To the Jewish jackboots, our disunited front is like sweet harp music playing in hell, which for Zionists is the only place they call home anyway.”

“A big tent is better than no tent at all. But the ideological purifiers will have none of it. One sin against ‘orthodoxy’ is a sin against the whole part. Yes, we need whites, blacks, Asians, Arabs, Muslims, Christians, atheists, rightists, leftists and even Jews who know that their eventual fate lies with us if they stand idle before the gun barrel of supremacy jeopardizing their future. Squabbling aboard the Titanic is what we are so engrossed with, egos firmly intact, memories empty of the lessons of history. God knows how long we will continue this madness.”

“Is unity so onerous? Are even the most facile partnerships too much to expect in the battle against evil? Are disunity and fragmentation the template for all we do? The answers are: yes, yes and yes.”

“A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

-Jesus Christ

By Patrick Grimm

Well over a year ago, as I was becoming more and more aware and awakened to the Jewish Question (and the fact that there is any age-old question at all about Jews shows that ‘anti-Semitism’ is a healthy reaction rather than bigotry) there was one author that helped to thrust the problem away from just a peripheral concern into the realm of a crisis of survival measuring titanic proportions and consequences. That author was, and still remains, Curtis Maynard. He is one of only a handful of political writers whom I credit with my own foray into all things supremacistly Jewish.

Reading some of Maynard’s work in 2006, I thought to myself “This guy has totally put his finger on the problem. If he can write so courageously about this issue, then perhaps I can too.” The trenchant honesty of his prose, the laboring of a working patriotic American to grasp the takeover of all aspects of our lives, our media and our government by an alien entity, alien in both its value system and its origins, was presented to the reader in such a way as to be comprehensible, even when the magnitude of Jew crimes and double-dealings was almost breathtakingly vast.

On July 4, 2006 I happened upon a Curt Maynard research piece, written two days prior, entitled “A Frank Discussion of Jewish Group Dynamics” (also known as “It’s the Jews, Stupid”) which found the author wading into the murky world of Jewish and Zionist topography with a tad bit of trepidation, at least at the outset, that would wane and fade as time, familiarity and anger transformed him from just a researcher to a full-blown anti-PC dissident raging against the imposed darkness of the zeitgeist of Zion now gripping us like a vice whose release we can now only silently pray for, fearing eternally in the backs of our minds that legislation against these sorts of “anti-Jewish” second thoughts might be forthcoming. But like Maynard, my second thoughts have turned to certainties on the malicious character of organized criminal Judaism. Seven months after reading his research piece, I too would take a stab at the ghoulish specter of chutzpah-possessed Jewish extremism.

Here is one pertinent passage, closing Maynard’s article that neatly sums up the seemingly endless list of Jewish wrongs with a parting call for immediately extricating ourselves from the web of organized Big Jewry:

“This list could go on and on, it would require a tomb the size of Moby Dick to encompass the many crimes ethnic Jews have committed against Gentiles just in the last decade. The point of writing this isn’t to convince readers that every Jew is deeply entwined in a plot to subvert Gentile society, but that Judaism is not a peaceful religion that seeks to coexist in harmony with non-Jews, the fact is Judaism is first and foremost a “supremacist” religion that advocates the dominance of non-Jews.

Unless Gentiles become aware of the fact that Zionism is nothing but Judaism’s latest “ism,” preceded in the past by many others, i.e. feminism, socialism, communism, and that these “ism’s” are nothing more than tactics used in a grand strategy to weaken our will and western civilization itself, we’ll never get to the heart of the problem at hand, we’ll continue to fight wars for the Jews, to kill for the Jews, to arrest and incarcerate people for the Jews, to suppress the right to free expression for the Jews, etc… etc… ad infinitum. The time to liberate ourselves is now.” [1]

After the travails and Jewish strong-arming censorship at the No More Wars For Israel conference, I believe that either liberation or national and global suicide and/or death draweth nigh, the latter brought to us by the plague-carrying rats aboard the bad ship Talmud Dollop. But thanks to Curtis Maynard and several essential others, I am awake now, poised and equipped with the knowledge and the confidence to fight the well-poisoners of the human family, these inhuman monsters that John DeNugent called “a group of defamers” and the “sons and daughters of Satan.” These are harshly appropriate names for those who follow the hellish creeds of Zionism and Talmudic Judaism, which are one and the same.

Curt, thank you for the inspiration you provided those fifteen months ago, the impetus, the stimulus to fight for the heritage and future of European-Americans, unencumbered in an ideal future from the slavery of Judaic thinking, and in the process securing the liberation of all peoples upon this planet who groan under the incalculable weight of the Jewish yoke, a yoke which makes chattel servitude seem mild in comparison. I appreciate the signpost you provided on my own intellectual pathway, a road that has led to the freedom I now hold to embrace uncomfortable, yet verifiable truths. Keep up the good fight.

[1] http://www.davidduke.com/general/curt-maynard-its-the-jews-stupid_603.html

Ladies and gentlemen, fellow speakers and guests. It is an honor and a privilege to be here at the No More Wars For Israel conference in sunny southern California. I was excited when Mark Glenn invited me to attend and speak to all the accomplished writers, academics and great patriots I see before me today.

I must say I was quite amused to see the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith’s take on this gathering, this meeting which discusses both the role of Israel in determining America’s foreign policy and the role of what I have coined as “Big Jewry” in influencing both the United States and the rest of the world. The ADL, without hesitation and without qualification describes the No More Wars For Israel Conference as an “Anti-Semitic conference organized by Mark Glenn of the Crescent and Cross Web site.” [1]

Now this is hardly surprising, but I find it humorous nevertheless. I’m quite sure that as I speak, the ADL and its overbearing president Abraham Foxman are literally in a panic mode, trying to do damage control and cursing in Yiddish as millions in America and around the world wake up to the reality of what the Jewish supremacists are doing to manipulate them, lie to them and to brainwash them in their controlled media outlets. But thank God for the internet, I say, and that the benighted are slowly transforming into the enlightened on the Jewish Question. Thank God for all of you and for many more like you who were not able to attend this gathering.

Like the Sinatra standard which states “wrap your troubles in dreams, and dream all your troubles away” our Jewish overlords expect us to “grin and bear it” when it comes to their control over our media, our banking and economic system, our foreign and our social policy. For our indifference to their control and domination over the last few decades, we have reaped disaster. We have gained not progress, but open borders, broken schools, trash television and Zionist propaganda on the airwaves. We have a dollar that is essentially worthless and a reputation around the world that is in tatters.

And now to add insult to the injury they have caused us, the agents of Big Jewry have dared to declare those of us who even speak aloud about that which we see RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES, to be extremists, to be racists, to be dangers in OUR OWN COUNTRY. No ladies and gentlemen, this arrangement is not tolerable and the price for speaking up is high, but we must not remain silent.

I would almost call my own intellectual journey into the area of “Jewish issues” serendipitous. Like many Americans, I had a passing knowledge of the intense liberalism of the Jewish community and their support for often radical causes. Like some of you here, I was raised in a Christian church and Jews, when they were discussed, were referred to as “God’s Chosen People.” To attack Jewish motives, behavior or nobility was considered a particularly heinous act.

Yet always in the back of my mind I had a gnawing curiosity, questions I could never answer, and the whitewashed picture of the Jews given in church and in the Christian school I attended as a youth, did not gel with what I saw Jewish people actively DOING. During college as I studied leftist movements, I noticed one thing consistently. Every political cause that was weakening, damaging or defrauding this country seemed to have a multitude of Jewish-sounding names attached to it. The National Abortion Rights Action League was headed by Kate Michelman, a liberal Jewish woman. People For the American Way, a far-Left action group was founded by leftist Jewish TV producer Norman Lear. Tons of Communists and ex-Communists alike had Jewish names and were openly and proudly Jews. I once remarked to my friend Jayne Gardener before I had my complete awakening “Why are Jews always on the Left?” It wasn’t until later that I concluded “Jews aren’t on the Left, they ARE THE LEFT!”

My eyes were opened wide some two and a half years ago when I started to do an internet search on Jews and Judaism. What I found was interesting, and horrifying to a mind so conditioned in philo-Semitism. Jews didn’t just support Communism. They created Communism. They didn’t just support groups like NARAL. No, they were actively extending the unlimited abortion license into every nation on earth. I found a book on Jewish Tribal Review which completely chronicled a list of everything that Big Jewry had their hands in and it was frightening, almost daunting.

By this point, I wanted to learn everything I could. I then read Dr. David Duke’s excellent and well-footnoted book Jewish Supremacism and Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique and I was wholly convinced of the danger of organized Jewry. I realized that it was the single largest threat to our freedoms and to our sovereignty. After completing Jewish Supremacism, I knew, then and there that I could not remain silent about what I knew. My family, my friends, everyone I am close to, now knows the truth about Big Jewry and its nefarious activities.

I often say, echoing the Grateful Dead “What a long strange trip it’s been.” An all-American boy goes from criticizing those who oppose Israel, even chastising members of a Brethren Church for their anti-Zionist stance, to speaking at a conference condemning US wars waged for the Zionist state. This is why, as I read about the ADL mislabeling this conference as an “extremist event” I find it funny. Their Hollywood stereotypes of jack-booted, Nazi arm-band wearing skin-heads screaming epithets against Jews bears no resemblance to reality. Yet because of my own writings, I have been called “Jew-obsessed”, a “Nazi”, a hater and all the usual canards. I have been branded as an extremist for not wanting to be told what I can and cannot think, can and cannot read and can and cannot say.

No, my friends, I will not be silenced by those who wrongly believe that a tiny minority, a largely hostile minority, hostile to the traditions that you and I take for granted, should be able to husband up rights only for themselves and dispense and revoke them as they see fit. I say there will be no more silence, no more fear and no more capitulation!

Apparently attacking our religions is not enough to satisfy them. Breaking our borders and replacing us is not enough to satisfy them. Getting our young men and women to die in the sands of Iraq, spilling their very blood and laying down their lives for the Jewish criminal terrorist state of Israel is not enough to satisfy them. Bleeding our taxpayers dry to fund their spying and their lying for AIPAC is not enough to satisfy them. For you see, NOTHING we can do will EVER satisfy Big Jewry because they are INSATIABLE. Yet they call us extremists!

What is extremism?

You want to know what extremism is? Well, I’ll tell you. Extremism is organized Jewry literally lecturing the rest of the world on the joys of diversity and multiculturalism, which as Dr. Tom Sunic has pointed out is a misnomer. What the Jews want for Gentile nations is multiracialism. They want populations which are as heterogeneous as possible, thus making them easier to control from the top by Zionist Jews. Foxman in one of his usual chutzpah-laden rants literally had the nerve, the gall to chastise contemporary Germans on the hazards of xenophobia and welcomed the more open “liberal” immigration policies which were being pushed, of course, by organized Jews to dilute the native German population. Eva Herman lost her television job and was called a Nazi for simply suggesting that perhaps German women should have more children. The Jewish extremists have done the same in America, in England, in Canada, in France and in every other nation where they have gotten a foothold. They dare, DARE, to lecture us, demanding that we swing our gates open wide to the world. To even oppose ILLEGAL immigration is a moral crime in the eyes of the Jewsmedia.

All of this moralizing and pontificating comes from a group of people who support a state whose immigration policies are based on “blood purity” on a criteria for Jewishness that makes any Nazi policies look downright moderate. Yet, in typical Jewish extremist fashion, what applies to us NEVER applies to them. They can genocide, displace and literally enslave a whole nation, steal land, bulldoze homes, assassinate academics and poets and dissenters. They can grab family farms and close down Palestinian schools and circumvent the WILL OF THE WORLD as they conscript our money to pay for the whole thing. They can invade neighboring countries and use WHITE PHOSPHORUS ON CIVILIANS! Then they demonize any recalcitrant politicians, strip people of jobs and livelihood, make death threats on families if ANYBODY SPEAKS UP and even notes what is being done in our name. And yet we wonder why the world hates us, is ASTONISHED by our UNRESERVED funding and cheerleading of such a rogue and cancerous so-called nation in the Middle East named Israel.

What is extremism? Extremism is a power, world Jewry, so avaricious, so starved for the hard-earned wages of others that their banking power robs us of our livelihood, through interest, through counterfeiting, through what is barely disguised theft. I won’t pretend to be an expert on economics or banking, but it doesn’t take an economist to figure out that the Rothschild empire that has thrown its net over the world is a colossal swindle machine.

In Andrew Hitchcock’s excellent book The Synagogue of Satan the author makes several revealing points that were particularly poignant. Hitchcock states “Iraq is one of six nations left in the world which do not have a Rothschild controlled central bank.” [2] Afghanistan was also a nation with an economy and currency free of Jewish Rothschild control. Is it mere coincidence that these two countries were the first to be invaded under the auspices of a “War on Terror”? Baron Meyer Rothschild stated unashamedly “Give me control over a nation’s currency and I care not who makes its laws.” [3] If you own the currency, you own the nation-state. It’s as simple as that.

Which countries are still unmolested by the House of Rothschild? Here they are: “There are now only 5 nations in the world left without a Rothschild controlled central bank: Iran; North Korea; Sudan; Cuba; and Libya.” [4] Strangely enough, four out of the five are labeled as rogue states by the United States government and by Israel. In fact, Iran is at the top of the list to be toppled by our Zionist-Occupied Government. In the David Frum/Richard Perle neo-conservative handbook for endless war for empire, Iran, North Korea and Libya are countries that need to be “dealt with” meaning that either invasion or regime change are touted as desirable and in the case of Iran, imminent.

What is extremism? Extremism is an atavistic hatred of Gentiles so strong, that even sex slavery and human trafficking are permitted by the Talmudist branch of the Jewish community. It’s a sad reality, but Jews, some religious and some irreligious, are the leaders of the worldwide sex industry. Yes, we are all familiar with the Jewish penchant for hard-core pornography and the warped entertainment flowing out of Hollywood. But many people are woefully unaware of the fact that Israel is the world leader in sex slavery.

In the Old Testament book of Leviticus 25:44-46, the Judeans’ desert god tells them in no uncertain terms “Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life..…” [5]

This is exactly what we see. Julie Lesser tells us:

“Human rights groups have long demanded actions against the trade in women in Israel. These women, many from the former Soviet Union, are working as prostitutes in a condition of virtual slavery. Many of the Russian women who have ended up in Israel’s brothels, some smuggled into the country from Egypt on the back of camels, expected to find jobs as cleaners and/or working in childcare. There are certain places where auctions are taking place. The Israeli police well know the names. They are nightclubs or regular bars. The women are brought there, buyers come and look at their bodies and their teeth, then the bidding starts. They are held by the pimps, beaten and totally isolated.”

It’s not enough that the Jewish extremists have stolen our economy, our currency, our sovereignty and our media. They also demand our women for their own lascivious illegal purposes. They like them blonde, blue-eyed and Gentile. The Israeli Jews, not content with the trouble they have caused with their Bolshevism, their Communism and their killing of millions upon millions of Russian Christians, must pile more injury atop more injury. They must defile European women, taking out their rage and hatred of Gentiles on these innocents who have been lured to Israel in hopes of finding honest employment. Not surprisingly, there is barely a peep about this travesty in our Jewish-run media machine, but if a single swastika is painted on a synagogue somewhere in the heart of Europe, it will make front page news. The wails for the US to do something, anything about rising worldwide “anti-Semitism” will reach a deafening crescendo. Yet “anti-Semitism” and Jewish behavior go hand-in-hand.

What is extremism? Extremism is believing that fanatical Jews have been tossed out of almost every country they have inhabited because there is something innately evil in the Gentile. What strange mental gymnastics it must require to believe such nonsense. Yet millions hold to just such lunacy. All of 79 countries have expelled Jews from their midst, some of them over and over again. Yet we are to believe that these Gentiles, spread across time and space, all possessed a mystical and completely unreasoning hatred of Jews that existed FOR NO REASON. Apparently the Jewish issue is the only issue of moment not subject to the laws of cause and effect. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so to speak, except for “anti-Semitism.” It arises from nothing, except perhaps psychosis and it is focused on one group to the exclusion of all others, again FOR NO REASON.

This type of solipsism on the part of Jewish extremists, that their negative behavior is not the cause of their historical woes is unique. In fact, it has a whole cottage industry that has grown up around it. This industry is always promoting the irrational notion that Jews are disliked only because of Gentile mental illness, only because of Gentile “projection” and jealousy or because of something lacking in Gentiles. In this way, by employing the fraudulent ideas of Sigmund Freud, Jews are never to blame for ANYTHING. To even have ill will towards an individual Jew for a palpable wrong done only means that you are in need of extensive therapy. It certainly can’t mean that the Jew in question is at fault.

Of course, the therapeutic model is now employed to censor almost every sort of politically incorrect speech, whether it be racial issues, crime statistics or the negative fallout of multiculturalism. Not only is the bringer of un-PC news seen as in error or a sinner against the new order of things. He is also very, very sick and in need of reprogramming, diversity training, brainwashing, in short, a therapy session. This is just one more way that the American mind has become Judaized, or to use the jargon of PC, Zionized.

I know of no other group so organized for their interests that they are able, with the full force of the media, the intelligentsia, entertainment and the mental health field to banish their critics so completely using the language of pathology. It began with Freud, evolved and grew more calculated with Marcuse and the Frankfurt School and now there is a whole field of Jewish psychoanalysts who write books and publish articles on the psychosis that is “anti-Semitism.” If this is not extremism for an ethnocentric end, then I don’t know what is.

When Mel Gibson made some drunken remarks saying that the Jews were behind all the wars, he wasn’t simply called drunk and disorderly. He wasn’t merely asked to apologize for his words. No, the ADL wanted Mr. Gibson to sit down with their appointed rabbis and “let the healing begin.” The implication was that he had a sickness, a mental disorder that needed to be cured. Gibson’s comments, inarticulate though they may have been, were accurate, as we see from the Jewish neo-conservative disaster in Iraq. Yet no mention was made about the accuracy or the inaccuracy of what he said. He had a sickness, a psychological problem called “anti-Semitism” and needed to get himself into therapy pronto. Talk about chutzpah. Talk about extremism. When B’nai B’rith refers to extremism, they refer only to themselves.

How can we fight extremism? Must we fight extremism with extremism? No, we only need two things: truth and bravery. We must tell the truth, in a simple, responsible and civil way, never conforming to the stereotypes created by our enemies in the media and in Hollywood. We also need bravery, courage to trumpet that truth, alert the world to the dangers of Jewish extremism. We must warn Jews who are not part of the problem about the hazards of remaining silent about the misdeeds of their treacherous leadership. We must not be afraid to say what needs to be said. To remain silent is not an option.

I will only leave you with this simple quote:

No one’s safe when freedom fails,
and good men rot in filthy jails,
and those who cried appease, appease,
are hung by those they tried to please.

—Author unknown

May we all stand for freedom, truth and justice for the American people, the European people, the Palestinian people, and indeed for every people. I thank you for your kind attention and for the opportunity to speak to you today about a few of the things on my mind. God bless.

[1] http://www.adl.org/learn/Events_2001/events_2003_flashmap.asp

[2] Hitchcock, Andrew The Synagogue of Satan

[3] http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/09/the-era-of-global-financial-instability/

[4] http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=195781

[5] http://www.venusproject.com/ethics_in_action/Israel_Sex_Slavery.html

“Virtue, then, is a kind of moderation inasmuch as it aims at the mean or moderate amount.”

-Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics

By Patrick Grimm

One reader commented on my comment to a Jewish reader and said “Your reply is symptomatic of what I like about this blog above all else (with the exception of TFC) Mr. Grimm. It dares to be painfully honest and outspoken about something, which others avoid like plague, yet in spite of all adversity from all sides, it still maintains a measure of discernment and moderation.”

This is true, and I am proud of the fact that “discernment and moderation” is the way I travel. I have not, as of yet, resorted to the types of imprudent language that I see as damaging in the larger scheme of things. Our enemies use this language liberally and abundantly, but I will not, no matter how far the Jewish foe tries to push me, aching and longing for any of us to dip ourselves into the mold they have made, if only we will take a cement bath.

I must admit that there are times when I feel like cutting loose with an angry stream of expletives at the latest excesses of Zionist Jews. But I don’t, I won’t because there is something more important to me than simple rage, as cathartic as uncensored anger can sometimes feel. There is a saying that goes “The medium is the message” and that is often true. I would also say that “The tone is the totality of the message” at least sometimes. Like a good singer, a writer too must possess a tone that compels and impels rather than repels. Whether it be humor, polemics, poetry, satire, philosophy or any other “genre”, the tone is paramount, at least from the reader’s point of view. Words do mean things and the feelings, the ideas and the motivation behind those words should be high-minded, even when discussing seemingly mundane topics like Sinatra songs and the silly zing of ZOG.

Our art, our literature, our theatre and our music have all been debased, actually defused of its potential moral currency by an alien philosophy, an anti-European entity that has submerged nearly the whole planet into a swill-like soup of amoral darkness. Our children are being turned, not into immoral agents, but amoral creatures, consumers instilled with little more than an appetite for consumption. Moral considerations have not been merely lowered. They have been made of no account whatsoever. This is the mental backdrop of the Talmudic Jewish worldview. Sadly, it is now enshrined in our laws, in our pop culture and into the minds of our children. It is soulless consumerism mixed with “sitch non-ethics” and stirred into a stew of disdain for anything smacking of traditionalism.

I, Patrick Grimm, have sat back, resting on my laurels for the past few years and watched as Jews have operated, both scruple-less and floating above any considerations of right and wrong. It’s not that these particular Jews lie while thinking “I am doing wrong, but I don’t care.” No, Kol Nidre ethics are at play. They can cancel out their falsehoods and fibs, not even with a prayer, because most of them don’t even feel that this is necessary anymore to justify what they do. They lie because they see rules of right and wrong as mere constructs that the Luddites have to follow, that the cattle have to maintain, but that they are exempt from. Because moral statutes don’t serve their agenda, they have long since dispensed with them altogether. They (statutes) are not even part of the game these Jews are playing, and winning, I might add. In this sense, I cannot follow them onto that rule-free field, and this gives them an advantage over the principled Gentiles who struggle against their wiles and their tricks.

But there is something to be said for goodness, even as imperfectly as I, like all morally sentient, yet fallible human beings try to uphold it. I abstain from bad language and bristling hatred, not just because they hurt the message, but because they are inappropriate to promulgate any message, at least when the war is being fought on a “cold” level. In any battle, the enemy must be obliterated, either figuratively or literally. But it is much harder to prevail when your adversary will not abide by the “rules of war”, codes generally laid out in a conflict between two “civilized” powers. The radical Jews have long since tossed aside any sense of fair play. Thus they can no longer be considered “civilized”, much less civil. They are not. Probably they never were.

So I will take the gloves off, be harsh when necessary, even mean when it is required. What I won’t do is descend into the sewer and wallow with the Jewish provocateurs, dish out a steady stream of their gutter-mouthed back-and-forths and give them the delight of an overreaction and obscenity-laden retort. They have proven who they are, that they delight in perversion, scatology, sickness, depravity, warmongering, bloodshed, violence, death, murder and the raping of our beautiful women by the dregs of society whose corner they proudly stand in. We should be better than this, and we are better than this. It’s all part of being people concerned with “discernment and moderation.” These are two traits that the henchmen of the Self-Chosen have never been accused of possessing.

By Patrick Grimm

They tried to warn us, tell us the danger of giving up our heritage, our destiny, everything our fathers built. But no, the Jew pressure was too great, our fathers hadn’t done the footwork and the political work and taken the initiative of tossing them down from their financial control over us. And the Jews used their pinch, their dollars, their loud mouths and their lawyerly will to make it all change. They debauched us, despoiled us, defecated on our culture, and we let them do it. Brave men tried to sound the alarm, tried to scream into increasingly deaf and distracted ears. We didn’t listen then, and we aren’t listening now.

Only a small cadre of individuals, risking livelihood, reputation and ruin have stepped forward to stand in the gap, to take away the dearth of info, the joyful delight in ignorance that fat, bloated, overweight and overindulged Americans take for granted as their birthright living in “the best country on earth” though most of them have never taken the time to visit any other country. Yes, we once were the greatest nation, maybe even the “essential nation” in many ways. But that window is closing fast.

Who was warning us? Henry Ford, for one, spoke through the bullhorn loudly and from the bully pulpit of his influence as one of our greatest American entrepreneurs, to make us see, help us to connect the dots of Jewish criminality. The Jews were busy as hell bringing it all down as fast as they could. Ford thought that perhaps someone should try to stop them before it was too late, should publicly address their negative behavior patterns that have become an infamous Jewish tradition after eons of replication which were always followed by reprisal, of course translated as “victimization” once the events reached the history books of Jewish publishers. It’s funny how Jewish victimhood always looks so much like the genocide of white people, isn’t it?

Henry Ford in his newspaper The Dearborn Independent did something that today would be unthinkable, inconceivable to the typical gutless American. He pulled away the false front of Jewish piety and showed us the horrid face of Judeo-vulgarity. In a book he authored called My Life and Work, Ford bluntly commented on the volume The International Jew. Here are a few pointed points he made:

“Readers of our articles will see at once that we are not actuated by any kind of prejudice, except it may be a prejudice in favor of the principles which have made our civilization.”

“There had been observed in this country certain streams of influence which were causing a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and social conduct; business was departing from its old-time substantial soundness; a general letting-down of standards were felt everywhere. It was not the robust coarseness of the white man, the rude indelicacy, say, of Shakespeare’s characters, but a nasty Orientalism which has insidiously affected every channel of expression — and to such an extent that it was time to challenge it. The fact that these influences are all traceable to one racial source is a fact to be reckoned with . . . Our work does not pretend to say the last word on the Jew in America. It says only the word which describes his present impress on this country. When that impress is changed, the report can be changed . . . Our opposition is only to ideas, false ideas, which are sapping the moral stamina of the people. These ideas proceed from easily identified sources, they are promulgated by easily discoverable methods and they are controlled by mere exposure.”

“When people learn to identify the source and nature of the influence swirling around them, it is sufficient. Let the American people once understand that it is not natural degeneracy but calculated subversion that afflicts us, and they are safe.”

“The explanation is the cure. This work was taken up without personal motives. When it reached a stage where we believed the American people could grasp the key, we let it rest for the time. Our enemies say that we began it for revenge and that we laid it down in fear. Time will show that our critics (the Jews) are merely dealing in evasion because they dare not tackle the main question.” [1]

I have read few quotes that so soberly and calmly diagnose the general tilt of the United States towards an ever lower and more debased moral tone, which in Ford’s day was only into the twilight of its diminution by Jews, who even then had begun a de-Christianization campaign to impugn and expunge the religion of the majority of our people. Business standards, rules of law and order and the quality of entertainment and theatre had also begun to shift downward as Jewish influence was on the rise. The zero-sum Jew-Gentile playing field was arcing towards the Hebrew side of things, guaranteeing demise for the Goyim’s house, his heritage and his folkways, which were quietly smarting from the tiny cuts being inflicted by activism from the Chosen.

It was hardly hatred that motivated Henry Ford, Sr. to point out the obvious and he makes clear that his own truth-telling newspaper and his uncovering of Jew chicanery had nothing to do with bigotry. Of course, this didn’t stop Jews from mounting a media assault, as they have always done to any critics in the past and continue to do to this day. “For fear of the Jews” and all that jazz.

Ford was right then and he is still correct today. He said “The explanation is the cure.” I would say that “the truth is the salve” or “the cure is disclosure” or “truth is all you need” or a Dragnetian “Just the facts, ma’am.” It really is no more convoluted than that, or it doesn’t need to be. The only problem we face today is that it is both harder and simpler to disseminate and publicize the message. In Henry Ford’s day, Jews were not as taboo a topic and untouchable as they are presently. In that sense, it was easier to say the dreaded J-word in a public venue.

On the other hand, Ford had the Model T, but lacked the technology of the mighty internet to diffuse the dastardly unspotted byplays of Jews working the media and flexing their muscles. We see only too well that the taboo is lifting, the “anti-Semitism” swipe is losing its sting, but the public square still broaches the issue with some trepidation, with a trembling not experienced in the 1920s. Ford had it easier in that sense, but the medium for the message was not as immediate as it is contemporaneously. Click a button, send an e-mail, write an article or work a blog or website and the truth gets scatter-shot very efficaciously. The father of the American automotive industry would have been grateful to have the tools we have at our fingertips and now take for granted.

Henry Ford, Sr. tried to warn us and his words will forever stand as a “code red” for any Americans still remaining who doubt the danger of letting the Jews have their way with our culture. The USA of his day looks downright Mayberryesque when compared with the sick, rotting infrastructure that is modern Americana. Ford saw religious symbols challenged and eradicated in a few isolated places and theatre grow more bawdy and risqué and PG-13.

He never could have imagined turning on a Jewish idiot box called television and watching filthy Jew comedienne Sarah Silverman on a Comedy Central commercial simulating licking a dog’s testicles for laughs. He couldn’t have envisioned seeing movies where people fornicate with horses and where serial killers are portrayed as chic and voguish and with-it. But he did see the plague of the Judaic mind, the canker sore infecting and imbuing everything with its disease after a long and humiliating Jewish rogering. Whatever you might say of Henry Ford, he did all he could. He didn’t want the “essential nation” to become the “dysfunctional devalued nation.” But we have ceased to exist as the former and embody the latter to a tee. In this sense, America is the most Jewish of nations. It is to our detriment that this is so.

Here is a parting shot from the automobile giant of all automobile giants, a man who in his day hovered over his contemporaries like a colossus. Ford writes:

“The Jews are propagandists. This was originally their mission. But they were to propagate the central tenet of their religion. This they failed to do. By failing in this they, according to their own Scriptures, failed everywhere. They are now without a mission of blessing. Few of their leaders even claim a spiritual mission. But the mission idea is still with them in a degenerate form; it represents the grossest materialism of the day; it has become a means of sordid acquisition instead of a channel of service.” [2]

In an age of Jewish dominion, voices of honesty are few and far between. May all of us emulate the bravery of the mogul who was also a maverick for truth.

[1] http://www.jrbooksonline.com/intro_by_gerald_smith.htm

[2] http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/ij_ch2.htm

By Patrick Grimm

“If you see the word ‘revolution’ on the end of something, be very sure that there are some Jewish interlopers bobbling around in there somewhere. The French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, even the American Revolution had their Jews, whether they were bankers or revolutionaries of a wholly different kind.”

“I say travel light and don’t become a victim of consumerism or the Jewish brand of Mammonism as you fight for European and true American survival. Your integrity, your honesty and your courage will warm and cloak you, even as those fair weather friends grow cold. Carry little but the diamonds, those nuggets of wisdom in your mind. They can’t be bought or sold, but they can be shared.”

“To be alone is not a curse, but only a chance to further reflect, learn and educate yourself. Of course, reflecting too much can rob you of the chance to apply your knowledge, if it does require application. But never underestimate the value of knowledge for its own sake. Dare to be impractical.”

“Of course we struggle against the fallout of flawed Jewry, yet still we are demonized for our wriggling, our writhing against the sandpaper discomfort of being quietly and shyly (on our part) worn down. Would not even a beast of the field fight for the territory he hunts within, dare to bite and rend the purloiner who wants to steal his life and his space? Yet we are marked as mentally diseased for following suit?”

“Someone can be an innocuous Jew, ignorant in his Jewishness, but never can he be innocent of his tradition if he truly understands it and still chooses to share in it. For to be a self-actualized Jew is to be at either a hot or cold war with all of humanity. It is to snatch up the mantle of both hatred and eternal enmity with every sentient being who is ‘Other.’ History screams that this is so.”