Xian Xinghai [Hsien Hsing-hai]
Xiao, Shuxian [Hsiao, Shu-sien]
Xinda [Xindas, Xinta], Spyridon.
Xylorimba [xylo-marimba, marimba-xylophone].
Xyndas [Xyntas, Xinda(s), Xinta(s)], Spyridon
(b Piraeus, 18 June 1950). Greek composer and musicologist. He studied with Varvoglis at the Hellenic Conservatory, Athens (harmony, 1964), privately with Papaïoannou (composition, 1966–71) and with Adamis (electronic music, 1972–3). After working under Hadjidakis at the Third Programme of Hellenic Radio, he undertook further studies in France with Xenakis, at the Centre d'Etudes de Mathématique et d'Automatique Musicales (CEMAMu) and at the Group de Recherches Musicales (1979–85). After returning to Athens he taught at the National Conservatory (1985–6) and the Athenaeum Conservatory (1987–93). In 1989 he co-founded (with the composer Kostas Moschos) the Institute of Research in Music and Acoustics. As a professor and coordinator of its music department, at the Ionian University, Corfu (from 1993), he gave a new impetus to research on Greek art music after the fall of Constantinople (1453) and 19th-century Ionian music.
(selective list)
Vocal: Eléni [Helen] (cant., Y. Seféris), mixed chorus, 1972; Argo (A. Embirikos), nar, orch, tapes, 1981; Sym. (A. Zakythinos), S, Mez, T, Bar, orch, 1992; 3 Songs (A. Pallis), children's chorus, 1993–4; Pictures at an Exhibition (textless), SATB, fl, a fl, 2 cl, a sax, t sax, tpt, 2 trbn, tuba, accdn, 2 gui, perc, vn, vc, tape, 1996; O Kreetikos [The Cretan] (D. Solomos), S, orch, 1998; Nekriki odhi [Funeral Ode] (D. Solomos), S, wind qnt, 1998; Mass (Messa Gregoriana), Mez, mixed chorus, orch, 1999; B-A-C-H (cant., no text), S, chorus, orch, 2000 |
Orch: Tpt Conc., 1977; Webern-Variationen, chbr orch, 1979; Concertante Variations, orch, 1981, rev. 1983; Palimpsest, chbr orch, 1987; Terra dove, orch, 1989; Db Conc., 1991, rev. 1996 |
Chbr: Rondo, vn, va, vc, 1971; Heterophony, tuba, pf, perc, 1973, rev. 1976; Concertante, ob, cl, bn, tpt, perc, str, 1974; Kondyliés, 3 perc, 1976; Sonatina, 2 fl, 1984; Conspirations sans silence, cl, 1985; Fantasia supra ‘L'homme armé’, fl, cl, vn, va, pf, perc, 1986; Tango Plus-Minus, chbr ens, 1986; Concertino, str, 1989; Modus ponens, fl, cl, tpt, euphonium, pf, vn, vc, db, 2 perc, 1991; Wind Qnt, 1994; Divertimento, cl, vn, va, vc, 1996; Divertimento, 8 brass, 1996–7 |
El-ac: Organum, ens, tape, 1971; Study 1, 3 synth, 1972; ViolonCelloStimmen, vc, perc, elecs, 1977; Couple T.S., pf, elecs, 1981; La troute, tuba, tape, 1981; … un aubregon de fer …, tuba, synth, 1982; Organum 2, elec gui, synth, 1983; … mee monan opsin … [… not only thy face …], ob, tape, 1986; Le sommeil de Dédale, chbr orch, tape, 1986; Haydn-Variationen, tpt, elecs, 1987; Les visages de la nuit, db sax, tape, 1989 |
Tape: Study 2, 1973; Oresteia, 1975; Study 3, 1980; Waste Land, 1980; Anamorfosseis [Reformations], 1984; Comment(ari)um, 1984; L, comme Bunuel, ou la forêt des symboles, 1984; La dame aux camélias, 1985; Paraphrases, 1985; Perigordion, 1985; Le voyage de Cyrano, 1985; I alligoria ton oron [The Allegory of the Hours], 1987; I ores [The Hours], 1987; Mix-Ages, 1987; Ou symphonia, ou melodia, oudhé moussiki [Neither Consonance, Nor Melody, Nor Music], 1987; Motetus, 1988; 1 … 789, 1989; Paradromi [Inadvertence], 1989 |
‘Mia ennoiologhiki anadifissi sti theoria tis moussikis’ [Semantic research in music theory], Echos, no.13 (1974), 56–9
‘Kinimatografos ke moussiki: i periptossi tou Mauricio Kagel’ [Cinema and music: the case of Mauricio Kagel], Film, no.18 (1979), 111–19
Aspects de la signification du timbre dans la musique du XXe siècle (diss., U. of Paris, 1981)
‘Les origines de l'orchestration moderne’, Revue internationale de musique française, no.18 (1985), 22–8
‘Et in Arcadia ego: metamodernismos ke paradossi sti simerini moussiki’ [Et in Arcadia ego: postmodernism and tradition in today's music], O politis, nos.81–2 (1987), 110–11
Keimena ya mia litourghiki theoria tis moussikis (Athens, 1992)
‘Mantzarou tychae’ [Destinies of Mantzaros], Porphyras, no.75 (1995), 25–34
‘I proti istoria tis neoellinikis moussikis’ [The earliest history of modern Greek music], Porphyras, no.79, (1996), 83–90
GEORGE LEOTSAKOS
(b Braïla, ?29 May 1922). French composer of Greek parentage. He belongs to the pioneering generation of composers who revolutionized 20th-century music after World War II. With the ardour of an outsider to academic musical life, he was one of the first to replace traditional musical thinking with radical new concepts of sound composition. His musical language had a strong influence on many younger composers in and outside of Europe, but it remained singular for its uncompromising harshness and conceptual rigour.
7. Macroscopic stochastic music.
9. Ancient theatre and Polytopes.
10. Microscopic stochastic music.
11. ‘Morphological’ compositions.
12. Globally tempered sieves and cellular automata.
PETER HOFFMANN
The eldest child of a Greek businessman, he was born in Romania, and at the age of ten was sent to a boarding school on the Greek island of Spetsai. An outsider there, he immersed himself in science and Greek literature, both of which were to become lifelong interests. His early musical experiences were various: at home he heard classical piano music played by his mother and the music of gypsy bands; on Spetsai he encountered Byzantine liturgical music and Greek folk music and dance; he also sang in the school choir (whose repertory included works of Palestrina), and absorbed classical music from the radio. Later, during World War II, a comrade in the Greek Resistance was to introduce him to the music of Bartók, Debussy and Ravel.
In Athens at 16, while preparing for the civil engineering entrance examination to the Athens Polytechnic, Xenakis took lessons in piano and music theory. He entered the Polytechnic in the autumn of 1940, but it closed following the Italian invasion of Greece in November of that year, and closed again several times during the course of the war. At first Xenakis took part in right-wing nationalist protests, but at the end of 1941 he joined the resistance of the communist-led National Liberation Front (EAM) against the German occupation (April 1941 to October 1944). He took an active part in mass demonstrations against, among other things, the German confiscation of all food supplies (which caused thousands of deaths in the winter of 1941–2) and the attempts to deport Greeks to carry out forced labour in Germany in February 1943. One photograph of this time shows Xenakis marching in the front row of a demonstration (Matossian, 1981). Later in his life, the composer was to speak of his experience of acoustic mass phenomena in these events, such as the way rhythmically regular shouts turned into chaotic screams of fear when the Nazis opened fire.
British forces arrived in Greece in mid-October 1944 to eliminate the EAM and restore the Greek monarchy; and in December of the same year, as a student in the ‘Lord Byron’ unit, Xenakis took part in street fighting against British tanks. He was seriously wounded when a shell hit him in the face. While he was in hospital, the EAM lost its political and military power, whereupon the ‘White Terror’ was unleashed on former Resistance members. In spite of his wartime experiences, Xenakis gained his diploma in February 1946. He was then conscripted into the national armed forces, where he heard for the first time of the concentration camps to which former Resistance fighters were being sent; he deserted and went into hiding. Condemned to death (his sentence was in 1951 commuted to ten years’ imprisonment) and stripped of his Greek citizenship, he managed to reach Italy with a false passport in September 1947, and illegally crossed into France in the hope of reaching the USA. However, he was forced to remain in Paris as an illegal immigrant with no material resources of any kind.
To earn his living, Xenakis worked until 1959 in Le Corbusier’s studio, at first as an engineer, but gradually playing a greater part in architectural design. He designed the kindergarten on the roof of the residential block in Nantes-Rézé, parts of the government buildings in Chandigarh, India, the rhythmically articulated glass façade of the monastery of St Marie de La Tourette, near Lyons, and the greater part of the chapel there. Finally, he was responsible for the unique shape of the Philips Pavilion at the 1958 Brussels Exposition Universelle, based on a sketch of Le Corbusier.
Most of his later architectural projects were intended for musical uses: a concert hall and studio for Scherchen’s musical centre in Gravesano (Ticino) in 1961 and the same for the Cité de la Musique in Paris in 1984; but the only design to be realized was the Diatope, one of his invented Polytopes. The space for a unique sound-and-light experience, it comprised a tent-like construction which was erected outside the Centre Pompidou in Paris for its opening in 1977 and later re-erected in Bonn for a Xenakis festival.
In Paris, Xenakis tried to compensate for the musical education he had missed during the war through self-directed study by taking lessons with Honegger and Milhaud. He also attended Messiaen’s analysis course at the Conservatoire (1950–52). Between 1955 and 1966 Scherchen repeatedly invited him to Gravesano, where he met musicians and experts in electro-acoustics (including Max Mathews). The articles Xenakis contributed to Scherchen’s Gravesaner Blätter formed the basis for his book Formalized Music (the first edition, in French, appeared in 1963). From 1957 to 1962 he worked in Schaeffer’s Groupe de Recherches Musicales (GRM; until 1958, Studio d’essai de la Radio-Télévision Française), where he realized his early electro-acoustic works. Invited to Japan in 1961, he received there enduring impressions of Asian musical culture which strengthened him in his idea of ‘universal musical structures’. In 1962 Xenakis composed a group of instrumental works with the help of a computer at IBM Paris (Schmidt, 1995, Baltensperger, 1996). In order to extend his research into the nature of sound itself with the help of the computer, he founded EMAMu (Equipe de Mathématique et Automatique Musicales) in 1966, which in 1972 became CEMAMu (Centre d’Etudes de Mathématique et Automatique Musicales). From 1967 to 1972, Xenakis taught at Indiana University in Bloomington, where he also directed a Center for Mathematical and Automated Music. He was a visiting professor at the Sorbonne (1973–89), and was awarded a doctorate there for his interdisciplinary research (Arts/Sciences: alliages) in 1976.
This period includes everything before Metastaseis (1953–4), which was detached from a triptych called Anastenaria to mark the beginning of the ‘official’ output. (Anastenaria also comprised two other quite substantial works, Procession aux eaux claires and Sacrifice, inspired by northern Greek festivals of pre-Christan origin). Youthful essays in composition appear not to have survived, though among them Xenakis has mentioned the monodies Odes de Sappho (Varga, 1982). The early works have not been published (although they have been studied, by Mâche in Restagno 1988; Solomos, 1996; and Baltensperger 1997), with the exception of Zyia, which was printed and performed in 1994. These pieces reflect Xenakis’s early ambition to emulate Bartók by founding a contemporary ‘Greek’ music, and approaching the traditional musical heritage with a systematic analytical eye, without renouncing contemporary compositional techniques of Western modernism. This project was expounded in the article ‘Provlimata Ellenikis Mousikis Synthesis’ (‘Problems of Greek music composition’). The elements of Greek folk music that were adapted include the use of certain modes, parallel 4ths, the specifically northern Greek type of vocal polyphony, and the unequal additive rhythms (aksak). Xenakis’s sense of structure and ‘formalization’ reached its peak in Sacrifice, a ‘mechanism’ based upon a Messiaenesque mode de valeurs with the help of a Fibonacci series (see Fibonacci series). Fibonacci series also determine the time structures of Metastaseis, which resemble, in some respects, the rhythmic spacing of glass panels on the façade of the monastery of La Tourette (cf Baltensperger, 1996, p.303).
In Achorripsis (1956–7) Xenakis formalized his stochastic method to a point where it could be automated by means of a computer programme, with the help of which he was able to generate the family of ST compositions in 1962. In addition, he experimented with ‘injecting memory into the stochastic method’ (Varga, 1982): by means of transitional probabilities (the Markov chain), he established a dynamic equilibrium between musical ‘states’ and then disrupted it, following a predetermined plan (e.g. in Syrmos, Analogique A and B). Stochastics were also used to create sound textures employed in the musical ‘games’ Duel (1959) and Stratégie (1962), using a mathematical game theory developed for the simulation of situations of military or economic conflict (Schmidt, 1995); for the presentation of unordered pitch sets in Herma (1961); for the piano solo of Eonta (1963–4); and for the gigantic glissando fields of Nomos gamma (1967–8). Such ideas continue to play a part in Xenakis’s most recent music, though no longer necessarily applied with precise calculation.
Instead of composing operas, Xenakis developed his own vision of a ‘synthesis of the arts’ on the basis of ancient drama, as in his Oresteïa (1965–6), to which were later added Kassandra (1987) and La déesse Athéna (1992) to complete Aeschylus’ trilogy. In his programmatic text ‘Notes sur la musique du théâtre antique’ he expounds the idea of an ‘abstract general singing’, which derives from the formalization of structures ‘invariant in space and time’ (Arts/Sciences: alliages); this includes, then, both Xenakis’s conception of recitation in the ancient theatre and his experience of the same in Japanese kabuki and nō. (The flexible pitches of Asian music may also have caused the softening of rigid glissandos into the elegant, curved lines which were later to join together in the branching structures of arborescences.)
One particular motivation for bringing the arts together in an organized ‘manifoldness’ was Xenakis’s perception of their underlying common ‘funda-mental’ structures, such as the abstract structure of total order. In his Polytopes (Revault d’Allonnes, 1975) as well as music Xenakis organized ‘clouds’ of light sources, the movement of laser-beams in space and the rhythm of electronic lightning flashes, at first by mechanical means, later using computer programmes. In addition to the few projects that were realized, such as the Diatope, there are others which remain utopias. These include a net of sound and light spread out above Paris, and the use of intercontinental satellite technology to illuminate the dark side of the moon or to generate an artificial Northern Lights. (The second idea had been planned for the bicentennial of the USA.) (Musique – Architecture, pp.181–91; Arts/Sciences: alliages, pp.11–18).
At Bloomington, Xenakis used a computer to realize his particular idea of sound synthesis, which consisted of stochastically manipulating the electric sound signal directed towards the loudspeakers. Once again this experiment was documented (‘New Proposals in Microsound Structure’, Formalized Music): ‘We can imagine the [sound] pressure variations produced by a particle capriciously moving in a non-determinate way around positions of equilibrium along the sound-wave ordinate’. Here the macroscopic aspect of probabilities (the law of large numbers, which levels out the probability fluctuations on the large scale) is replaced by the microscopic aspect (the dramatic accumulation of probability fluctuations in time): instead of the behaviour of the whole cloud, the object of attention now is the random path of a single particle inside the cloud.
Anastenaria: le sacrifice, orch (51 insts), 1953, sketch |
Metastaseis, 1953–4; SWF SO, cond. H. Rosbaud, Donaueschingen, 16 Oct 1955 |
Pithoprakta, 1955–6; Bavarian RSO, cond. H. Scherchen, Munich, 8 March 1957 |
Achorripsis, 21 insts, 1956–7; Colón cond. Scherchen, Buenos Aires, 20 July 1958 |
Duel, 2 small orchs, 1959; Radio Hilversum PO, cond. D. Masson and F. Terby, Hilversum, 18 Oct 1971 |
Syrmos, 12 vn, 3 vc, 3 db, 1959; Ensemble Instrumental de Musique Contemporaine, cond. Simonović, Paris, 20 May 1969 |
Stratégie, 2 small orchs, 1959–62; Venice Festival Orchestra, cond. B. Maderna and C. Simonović, 25 April 1963 |
ST/48, 48 insts, 1959–62; Orchestre Philharmonique de l’ORTF, cond. L. Foss, Paris, 21 Oct 1968 |
Akrata, 16 wind, 1964–5; cond. Simonović, Paris, 1965 |
Terretektorh, 1966; Orchestre Philharmonique de l’ORTF, cond. Scherchen, Royan, 3 April 1966 |
Polytope, 4 orch groups, 1967; Ensemble Instrumental de Musique Contemporaine, cond. Simonović, Montreal, Expo 67, 1967 |
Nomos gamma, 1967–8; Orchestre Philharmonique de l’ORTF, cond. C. Bruck, Royan, 4 April 1969 |
Kraanerg (ballet), orch, tape, 1968; Ottawa, June 1969 |
Synaphaï, pf, orch, 1969; Pludermacher, cond. M. Tabachnik, Royan, 6 April 1971 |
Antikhthon (ballet), 1971; cond. Tabachnik, Bonn, Festival Xenakis, 21 Sept 1974 |
Eridanos, 8 brass, str orch, 1973; Ensemble Européen de Musique Contemporaine cond. Tabachnik, La Rochelle, 13 April 1973 |
Erikhthon, pf, orch, 1974; C. Helffer, Orchestre de l’ORTF, cond. Tabachnik, Paris, 21 May 1974 |
Noomena, 1974; Orchestre de Paris, cond. G. Solti, Paris, 16 Oct 1974 |
Empreintes, 1975; Netherlands Radio PO, cond. Tabachnik, La Rochelle, 29 June 1975 |
Jonchaies, 1977; Orchestre National de France, cond. Tabachnik, Paris, 21 Dec 1977 |
Aïs, amp Bar, perc, orch, 1980; S. Sakkas, Gualda, Bavarian RSO, cond. Tabachnik, Munich, 13 Feb 1981 |
Pour les baleines, str, 1982; Orchestre Colonne, cond. D. Masson, Orléans, 2 Dec 1983 |
Lichens, 1983; Liège PO, cond. Bartholomée, Liège 16 April 1984 |
Shaar, str, 1983; Jerusalem Sinfonietta, cond. J.- P. Izquierdo, Tel Aviv, 3 Feb 1983 |
Alax, 3 ens of 10 insts (fl, cl, 2 hn, trbn, hp, perc, vn, 2 vc), 1985; Ensemble Modern, Ensemble Köln, Gruppe Neue Musik Hanns Eisler, cond. E. Bour, Cologne, 15 Sept 1985 |
Horos, 1986; Japan PO, cond. H. Iwaki, Tokyo, 24 Oct 1986 |
Keqrops, pf, orch, 1986; R. Woodward, New York PO, cond. Z. Mehta, New York, 13 Nov 1986 |
Ata, 1987; SWF SO, cond. M. Gielen, Baden-Baden, 3 May 1988 |
Tracées, 1987; Orchestre National de Lille, cond. J.-C. Casadeus, Paris, 17 Sept 1987 |
Kyania, 1990; Montpellier PO, cond. Z. Peskó, Montpellier, 7 Dec 1990 |
Tuorakemsu, 1990; Shinsei Nippon Orchestra, cond. H. Iwaki, Tokyo, 9 Oct 1990 |
Dox-Orkh, vn, orch, 1991; Arditti, BBC SO, London, cond. A. Tamayo, Strasbourg, 6 Oct 1991 |
Krinòïdi, 1991; Orchestra Sinfonica dell’Emilia-Romagna ‘Arturo Toscanini’, cond. R. Encinar, Parma, May 1991 |
Roáï, 1991; Berlin RSO, cond. O. Henzold, Berlin, 24 March 1992 |
Troorkh, trbn, orch, 1991; C. Lindberg, Swedish RSO, cond. E.-P. Salonen, Stockholm, 26 March 1993 |
Mosaïques, 1993; Orchestre des Jeunes de la Méditerranée, cond. Tabachnik, Marseilles, 23 July 1993 |
Dämmerschein, 1993–4; Cologne RSO, cond. Peskó, Lisbon, 9 June 1994 |
Koïranoï 1994; NDR SO, cond. Peskó, Hamburg, 1 March 1996 |
Ioolkos, 1995; SWF SO, cond. K. Ryan, Donaueschingen, 20 Oct 1996 |
Voile, str, 1995; Munich Chamber Orchestra, cond. C. Poppen, Munich, 16 Nov 1995 |
Sea-Change, 1997; BBC SO, cond. A. Davis, London, 23 July 1997 |
O-Mega, perc solo, chbr orch, 1997; E. Glennie, London Sinfonietta, cond. M. Stenz, Huddersfield, 30 Nov 1997 |
Zyia (folk), S, male vv (10 minimum), fl, pf, 1952; cond. R. Safir, Evreux, 5 April 1994 |
Anastenaria: procession aux eaux claires, SATB (30vv), male choir (15vv), orch (62 insts), 1953, sketch |
Polla ta dhina (Sophocles: Antigone), children’s vv, wind, perc, 1962; cond. Scherchen, Stuttgart, 25 Oct 1962 |
Hiketides: les suppliates d’Eschyle, 50 female vv, 10 insts/orch, 1964; cond. Simonović, Paris, 1968 |
Oresteïa (incid music/concert work, Aeschylus), chorus, 12 insts, 1965–6; cond. Simonović, Ypsilanti, MI, 14 June 1966 |
Medea (incid music, Seneca), male vv, orch, 1967; cond. Masson, Paris, 29 March 1967 |
Nuits, 3 S, 3 A, 3 T, 3 B, 1967–8; cond. M. Couraud, Royan, 7 April 1968 |
Cendrées, chorus, orch, 1973–4; cond. Tabachnik, Lisbon, 20 June 1974 |
A Colone (Sophocles), male/female vv (20 minimum), 5 hn, 3 trbn, 6 vc, 4 db, 1977; Metz, 19 Nov 1977 |
A Hélène, Mez, female vv, 2 cl, 1977; Epidavros, July 1977 |
Anemoessa (phonemic text), SATB (42 minimum), orch, 1979; cond. R. Dufallo, Amsterdam, 21 June 1979 |
Nekuïa (phonemes and text from J.-P. Richter: Siebenkäs and Xenakis: Ecoute), SATB (54 minimum), orch, 1981; cond. Tabachnik, Cologne, 26 March 1982 |
Pour la Paix (Xenakis), SATB, 2 female spkrs, 2 male spkrs, tape (UPIC), 1981, version for SATB (32 minimum); cond. M. Tranchant, Paris, 23 April 1982 |
Serment-Orkos (Hippocrates), SATB (32 minimum), 1981; Greek Radio Choir, Athens, 1981 |
Chant des Soleils (Xenakis, after P. du Mans), SATB, children’s choir, 18 brass 6 (hn, 6 tpt, 6 trbn) or multiple, perc, 1983; Nord-Pas-de-Calais [simultaneous performance in several towns of the region], 21 June 1983 |
Idmen A/Idmen B (phonemes from Hesiod: Theogony), SATB (64 minimum), 4/6 perc, 1985; Antifona de Cluj, Les Percussions de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 24 July 1985 |
Knephas (phonemes by Xenakis), SATB (32 minimum), 1990; cond. J. Wood, London, 24 June 1990 |
Pu wijnuej we fyp (A. Rimbaud), children’s choir, 1992; cond. D. Dupays, Paris, 5 Dec 1992 |
Bakxai Evrupidou [The Bacchae] (Euripides), Bar, female vv (also playing maracas), pic, ob, dbn, hn, tpt, trbn, 3 perc, 1993; J. Dixon, cond. N. Kok, London, 1 Sept 1993 |
Sea-Nymphs (phonemes from W. Shakespeare: The Tempest), SATB (24 minimum), 1994; cond. S. Joly, London, 16 Sept 1994 |
Tripli zyia, 1v, pf, 1952, unpubd |
Trois poèmes (F. Villon: Aiés pitié de moy, V. Mayakovsky: Ce soir je donne mon concert d’adieux, Ritsos: Earini Symphonia [Spring Symphony]), 1v, pf, 1952, unpubd |
La colombe de la paix, A, 4vv (SATB), 1953, unpubd |
Stamatis Katotakis (table song), 1v, male vv, 1953, unpubd |
N’shima, 2 Mez/A, 2 hn, 2 trbn, vc, 1975; cond. J.-P. Izquierdo, Jerusalem, Feb 1976 |
Pour Maurice, Bar, pf, 1982; S. Sakkas, C. Helffer, Brussels, 18 Oct 1982 |
Kassandra (Aeschylus), Bar + 20str psalterion, perc, 1987; Sakkas, Gualda, Gibellina, 21 Aug 1987 [second part of Oresteïa: see choral] |
La déesse Athéna (Aeschylus), Bar, pic, ob, E cl, db cl, dbn, hn, pic tpt, trbn, tuba, perc, vc, 1992; Sakkas, cond. Tabachnik, Athens, 3 May 1992 [scene from Oresteïa: see choral] |
Dipli Zyia, vn, vc, 1951, unpubd |
ST/4, str qt, 1956–62; Bernède Quartet, Paris, 1962 |
ST/10, cl, b cl, 2 hn, hp, perc, str qt, 1956–62 cond. Simonović, Paris, May 1962 |
Morsima-Amorsima, pf, vn, vc, db, 1956–62; cond. Foss, Athens, 16 Dec 1962 |
Analogique A, 9 str, 1958 [must be performed with tape work Analogique B]; cond. Scherchen, Gravesano, summer 1959 |
Amorsima-Morsima, cl, b cl, 2 hn, hp, perc, str qt; cond. Foss, Athens, 1962 |
Atrées, fl, cl, b cl, hn, tpt, trbn, 2 perc, vn, vc, 1962; cond. Simonović, Paris, 1962 |
Eonta, 2 tpt, 3 trbn, pf, 1963–4; cond. P. Boulez, Paris, 16 Dec 1964 |
Anaktoria, cl, bn, hn, str qt, db, 1969; Octuor de Paris, Avignon, 3 July 1969 |
Persephassa, 6 perc, 1969; Les Percussions de Strasbourg, Persepolis, 9 Sept 1969 |
Aroura, 12 str, 1971; cond. Tabachnik, Lucerne, 24 Aug 1971 |
Charisma, cl, vc, 1971; Royan, 6 April 1971 |
Linaia-Agon, hn, trbn, tuba, 1972; cond. Tabachnik, London, 26 April 1972 |
Phlegra, 11 insts, 1975; cond. Tabachnik, London, 28 Jan 1976 |
Epeï, eng hn, cl, tpt, 2 trbn, db, 1976; cond. S. Garant, Montréal, 9 Dec 1976 |
Retours-Windungen, 12 vc, 1976; Berlin PO, Bonn, 20 Feb 1976 |
Dmaathen, ob, perc, 1976; N. Post, J. Williams, New York, May 1977 |
Akanthos, 9 insts, 1977; Ensemble Studio 111, Strasburg, 17 June 1977 |
Ikhoor, str trio, 1978; Trio à Cordes Français, Paris, 2 April 1978 |
Dikhthas, vn, pf, 1979; S. Accardo, B. Canino, Bonn, 4 June 1980 |
Palimpsest, eng hn, b cl, bn, hn, perc, pf, str qnt, 1979; cond. S. Gorli, Aquila, 3 March 1979 |
Pléïades, 6 perc, 1979; Les Percussions de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 17 May 1979 |
Komboï, amp hpd, perc, 1981; Chojnacka, Gualda, Metz, 22 Nov 1981 |
Khal Perr, brass qnt, 2 perc, 1983; Quintette Arban, Alsace Percussions, Beaune, 15 July 1983 |
Tetras, str qt, 1983; Arditti String Quartet, Lisbon, 8 June 1983 |
Thalleïn, pic, ob, cl, bn, hn, pic tpt, trbn, perc, pf, str qnt, 1984; cond. E. Howarth, London, 14 Feb 1984 |
Nyûyô [Setting Sun], shakuhachi, sangen, 2 koto; 1985; Angers, Ensemble Yonin-No Kai (Tokyo), 30 June 1985 |
Akea, pf, str qt, 1986; Helffer, Arditti String Quartet, Paris, 15 Dec 1986 |
A l’Ile de Gorée, amp hpd, pic, ob, cl, bn, hn, tpt, str qnt, 1986; cond. Kerstens, Amsterdam, 4 July 1986 |
Jalons, pic, ob, b cl, db cl, dbn, hn, tpt, trbn, tuba, hp, str qnt, 1986; cond. Boulez, Paris, 26 Jan 1987 |
XAS, sax qt, 1987; Raschèr Quartet, Lille, 17 Nov 1987 |
Waarg, pic, ob, cl, bn, hn, tpt, trbn, tuba, str qnt, 1988; cond. Howarth, London, 6 May 1988 |
Echange, solo b cl, fl, ob, cl, bn, hn, tpt, trbn, tuba, str qnt, 1989; H. Sparnaay, cond. Porcelijn, Amsterdam, 26 April 1989 |
Epcycle, solo vc, fl, ob, cl, hn, tpt, trbn, tuba, 2 vn, va, db, 1989; R. de Saram, Spectrum Ensemble, cond. G. Protheroe, London, 18 May 1989 |
Okho, 3 djembés, tall African drum, 1989; Trio Le Cercle, Paris, 20 Oct 1989 |
Ophaa, hpd, perc, 1989; Chojnacka, Gualda, Warsaw, 17 Sep 1989 |
Tetora, str qt, 1990; Arditti String Quartet, Witten, 27 Apr 1991 |
Paille in the wind, vc, pf, 1992; J. Scalfi, Woodward, Milan, 14 Dec 1992 |
Plektó, fl, cl, perc, pf, vn, vc, 1993; cond. R. Platz, Witten, 24 April 1994 |
Ergma, str qt, 1994; Mondrian String Quartet, The Hague, 17 Dec 1994 |
Mnamas Xapin Witoldowi Lutoslavskiemu [In Memory of Witold Lutosławski], 2 hn, 2 tpt, 1994; cond. W. Michniewki, Warsaw, 21 Sept 1994 |
Kaï, fl, cl, bn, tpt, trbn, vn, va, vc, db, 1995; cond. D. Coleman, Oldenburg, 12 Nov 1995 |
Kuïlenn, fl, 2 ob, 2 cl, 2 bn, 2 hn, 1995; Netherlands Wind Ensemble, Amsterdam, 10 June 1996 |
Hunem-Iduhey, vn, vc, 1996; E. Michell, O. Akahoshi, New York, 9 Aug 1996 |
Ittidra, str sextet, 1996; Arditti String Quartet, T. Kakuska (va), V. Erben (vc), Frankfurt, 4 Oct 1996 |
Roscobeck, vc, db, 1996; R. de Saram, S. Scordanibbio, Cologne, 6 Dec 1996 |
Zythos, trbn, 6 perc, 1996; Lindberg, Kroumata Ensemble, Birmingham, 10 April 1997 |
Seven piano pieces without title, Menuet, Air populaire, Allegro molto, Mélodie, Andante, pf, 1949–50, unpubd |
Suite, pf, 1950–51, unpubd |
Thème et conséquences, pf, 1951, unpubd |
Herma, pf, 1960–61 |
Nomos alpha, vc, 1965–6; S. Palm, Bremen, 5 May 1966 |
Mikka, vn, 1971; I. Gitlis, Paris, 27 Oct 1972 |
Evryali, pf, 1973; C. Helffer, Paris, 1974 |
Gmeeoorh, org, 1974; C. Holloway, U. of Hartford, CT, 1974 |
Psappha, perc, 1975; S. Gualda London, 2 May 1976 |
Theraps, db, 1975–6; F. Grillo, 26 March 1976 |
Khoaï, hpd, 1976; E. Chojnacka, Cologne, 5 May 1976 |
Mikka ‘S’, vn, 1976; R. Pasquier, Orléans, 11 March 1976 |
Kottos, vc, 1977; M. Rostropovich, La Rochelle, 28 June 1977 |
Embellie, va, 1981; G. Renon-McLaughlin, Paris, 1981 |
Mists, pf, 1981; Woodward, Edinburgh, 1981 |
Naama, amp hpd, 1984; Chojnacka, Luxembourg, 20 May 1984 |
Keren, trbn, 1986; B. Sluchin, Strasbourg, 19 Sept 1986 |
A r. (Hommage à Ravel), pf, 1987; H. Austbö, Montpellier, 2 Aug 1987 |
Rebonds, perc, 1988; Gualda, Rome, 1 July 1988 |
some works exist in one or more revised realizations
Diamorphoses, 2-track, 1957–8; Brussels, 5 Oct 1958 |
Concret PH, 2-track, 1958; Brussels, Philips pavilion, 1958 |
Analogique B, 2-track, 1958–9 [must be performed with chbr work Analogique A]; cond. Scherchen, Gravesano, summer 1959 |
Orient-Occident, 2-track, 1960; Cannes, May 1960 |
The Thessaloniki World Fair (film score), 1-track, 1961 |
Bohor, 4-track, 1962; Paris, 15 Dec 1962 |
Hibiki Hana Ma, 12-track, 1969–70; Osaka, Expo 70, 1970 |
Persépolis, 8-track, 1971; Persepolis, 26 Aug 1971 |
Polytope de Cluny, 8-track, lighting, 1972; Paris, 17 Oct 1972 |
Polytope II, tape, lighting, 1974; Paris, 1974 |
La legénde d'Eer (Diatope), 4- or 8-track, 1977; Paris, 11 Feb 1978 |
Mycenae alpha, 2-track, UPIC, 1978; Mycenae, 2 Aug 1978 |
Taurhiphanie, 2-track, UPIC, 1987; Arles, 13 July 1988 |
Voyage absolu des Unari vers Andromède, 2-track, UPIC; Osaka, 1 April 1989 |
GENDY3, 2-track, Dynamic Stochastic Synthesis, 1991; Metz, 17 Nov 1991 |
S 709, 2-track Dynamic Stochastic Synthesis, 1994; Paris, 2 Dec 1994 |
|
Principal publishers: Boosey & Hawkes, Bote & Bock, Modern Wewerka, Salabert |
Untitled analysis of Metastaseis, in C.E. Le Corbusier: Modulor 2 (Boulogne, 1955, 2/1983; Eng. trans., 1958), 341–4
‘I simerines tasis tis gallikis moussikis’ [Current tendencies in French music], Epitheorissi technis [Athens], no.6 (1955), 466–70
‘Provlimata ellinikis moussikis’ [Problems of Greek music], Epitheorissi technis [Athens], no.9 (1955), 185–9; Ger. trans. in A. Baltensperger: Iannis Xenakis und die Stochastische Musik: Komposition im Spannungsfeld von Architektur und Mathematik (Zürich, 1997)
‘Der “Modulor”’, Gravesaner Blätter, no.9 (1957), 2–5 [incl. Eng. trans.]
‘Architecture’, in C.E. Le Corbusier: Le poème électronique (Paris, 1958), 9; Eng. trans. as ‘Le Corbusier’s Electronic Poem’ in Gravesaner Blätter, no.9 (1957), 51–4
with L.C. Kalff: ‘The Philips Pavilion and The Electronic Poem’, Arts and Architecture, no.11 (1958), 23
‘Les Métastassis’, unpubd typescript, before 1959, D-DSim
‘La musique stochastique: éléments sur les procédés probabilistes de composition musicale’, Revue d’esthétique, no.14 (1961); Eng. trans. in Gravesaner Blätter, no.18 (1960), 84–105; no.19 (1960), 140–50; no.21 (1961), 113–21; no.22 (1961), 144–5
‘Stochastic Music’, Music East and West: Tokyo 1961, 134–40
‘Un cas: la musique stochastique’, Musica-disques, no.102 (1962), 11
‘Debussy a sformalizowanie muzyki’, Ruch muzyczny, vi/16 (1962), 7
‘Wer ist Iannis Xenakis/Who is Iannis Xenakis’, Gravesaner Blätter, nos.23–4 (1962), 185–6
‘Musiques formelles’, ReM, nos. 253–4 (1963); repr. as Musiques formelles (Paris, 1981); Eng. trans. as Formalized Music: Thought and Mathematics in Composition (Bloomington, IN, 1971, enlarged 2/1992)
‘Schaeffer, Pierre’, MGG1
‘Intuition or Rationalism in the Techniques of Contemporary Musical Composition’, Berlin Confrontation: Künstler in Berlin (Berlin, 1965), 15–18
‘Tribune libre’, Gravesaner Blätter, no.26 (1965), 5
‘Motsägelsen musik och maskin’, Nutida musik, ix/5–6 (1965–6), 23
‘Notice sur Orestie’, Sigma, no.3 (1966), 6; rev. as ‘Arcaiotha kai sugcronh mousikh’ [Antiquity and contemporary music], Deltio kritikis diskografias, nos.18–19 (1976), 377–82
‘Structures hors-temps’, The Musics of Asia: Manila 1966, 152–73 [summary in EthM, xi (1967), 107–13]
‘Ad libitum …’, World of Music, ix/1 (1967), 17–19
‘La musique et les ordinateurs’, Quinzaine littéraire (March 1968), 23–6
‘Xenakis, Iannis’, MGG1
‘Une note’, ReM, nos. 265–6 (1969), 51
‘Structures universelles de la pensée musicale’, Liberté et organisation dans le monde actuel (Paris, 1969), 173–80
‘Musique et programmation’, ITC (Ingénieurs, Techniciens et Cadres) actualités, no.2 (1970), 55–7
‘Short Answers to Difficult Questions’, Composer [USA], ii/2 (1970), 39
Untitled essay, PNM, ix/2 (1970–71), 130
‘Les dossiers de l’E.m.a.mu’, Colloquio artes, xiii/5 (1971), 40–48
‘Free Stochastic Music from the Computer’, Cybernetics, Arts, and Ideas, ed. J. Reichardt (London, 1971)
Musique, Architecture (Tournai, 1971, enlarged 2/1976; Eng. trans., forthcoming)
Preface to M. Gagnard: L’initiation musicale des jeunes (Paris, 1971), 9–11
‘Den kosmika värtdsstaden’, Nutida musik, xv/3 (1971–2), 13–14
‘Om “Terretektorh”’, Nutida musik, xv/2 (1971–2), 47
Untitled essay, Ferienkurse ’74: Darmstadt 1974, ed. E. Thomas, 16–18
‘Propos impromptu’, Courrier musical de France, no.48 (1974), 130–33
‘Iannis Xenakis: aftoviografiko’ [Xenakis: an autobiography], Deltio kritikis diskografias, nos.18–19 (1976), 374–6
Opening Address, Computer Music Conference V: Evanston, IL, 1978
‘Centre Georges Pompidou: geste de lumière et de son’, Le Diatope-Xenakis (Paris, 1978), ‘Epistimoniki skepsi kai moussiki’ [Scientific thought and music], Rotonta, no.4 (1978), 380–95
Untitled essay, in I. and G. Bogdanoff: L’effet science-fiction (Paris, 1979), 283–6
Arts/Sciences: alliages (Paris, 1979; Eng. trans., 1985, as Arts – Sciences, Alloys: the Thesis Defense of Iannis Xenakis)
‘Brief an Karl Amadeus Hartmann’, Karl Amadeus Hartmann und die Musica Viva, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, 19 June – 29 Aug 1980, ed. R. Wagner, M. Attenkofer and H. Hell (Munich, 1980), 337 [exhibition catalogue]
‘Migrazioni nella composizione musicale’, Musica e elaboratore, ed. A. Vidolin (Venice, 1980)
‘Dialexh’ [Conference], Symbossio: synchroni tecni kai paradossi (Athens, 1981), 195–206
‘Homage to Béla Bartók’, Tempo, no.136 (1981), 5
‘Il faut que ça change’, Le matin (26 Jan 1981)
‘Le temps en musique’, Spirales, no.10 (1981), 9–11
‘La composition musicale est à la fois dépendante et indépendante de l’évolution technologique des systèmes analogiques ou numériques’, Conférences des journées d’études: Festival International du Son (Paris, 1982), 137–55
‘Il pensiero musicale’, Spirali, no.41 (1982), 44–5
‘Polytopes’, in J.-P Leonardini, M. Collin and J. Markovits: Festival d’automne à Paris 1972–1982 (Paris, 1982), 218
‘Science et technologie, instruments de création’, Recherche et technologie: Paris 1982 (Paris, 1982)
‘Perspectives de la musique contemporaine’, Echos, no.1 (1983), 47
‘Un exemple enviable’, ReM, nos.372–4 (1984), 67
‘Notice sur la vie et les travaux de Georges Auric, Discours prononcés dans la séance publique tenue par l’Académie des Beaux-Arts, no.6 (1984), 13–19
‘Un plaidoyer pour l’avant-garde?’, Nouvel observateur, nos. 19–25 (1984), 97
‘La source de l’expérience humaine’, Le monde (13 Sept 1984)
‘Les conditions actuelles de la composition’, France Forum, nos.223–4 (1985), 10–12
‘Le monde en harmonie’, Silences, no.1 (1985), 91–4
‘Briefauszug an Hermann Scherchen’, Hermann Scherchen Musiker, ed. H. Pauli and D. Wunsche (Berlin, 1986), 95
‘Hermann Scherchen’, Monde de la musique, no.89 (1986), 91
‘Ouvrir les fenêtres sur l’inédit’, 20ème siècle: images de la musique française, ed. J.-P. Derrien (Paris, 1986), 160–62
‘Mykenae alpha’, PNM, xxv/1–2 (1987), 12–15
‘Xenakis on Xenakis’, PNM, xxv/1–2 (1987), 16–63
‘A propos de Jonchaies’, Entretemps, no.6 (1988), 133–7
Untitled essay, Edgard Varèse 1883–1965: Dokumente zu Leben und Werk, ed. H. de la Motte-Haber and K. Angermann (Frankfurt, 1990), 79–80
‘Originality in Musical Composition’, Technology’s Challenge for Mankind (Tokyo, 1990), 17–24
‘Sieves’, PNM, xxviii/1 (1990), 58–78; partial repr. in Kéleütha (Paris, 1994), 75–87
‘UPIC Sketch for Voyage absolu des Unari vers Andromède, 1989, PNM, xxviii/2 (1990), 119, 135
‘More Thorough Stochastic Music’, Computer Music Conference: Montreal 1991, 517–18
Untitled essay, PNM, xxxi/2 (1993), 135 [on John Cage]
Kéleütha (Paris, 1994) [incl. ‘La crise de la musique sérielle’, 39–43; ‘Lettre à Hermann Scherchen’, 44–5; ‘Théorie des probabilités et composition musicale’; ‘Eléments sur les procédés probabilistes (stochastiques) de composition musicale’, 46–53; ‘La voie de la recherche et de la question’, 67–74; ‘Culture et créativité’, 129–32; ‘Des universes du son’, 112–20; ‘Entre Charybde et Scylla’, 88–93; ‘Les chemins de la composition musicale’, 15–38; ‘Musique et originalité’, 106–11; ‘Pour l’innovation culturelle’, 133–5; ‘L’univers est une spirale’, 136–8; ‘Condition du musicien’, 121–8; ‘Cribles’, 75–87; ‘Sur le temps’, 94–105]
Musique et originalité (Paris, 1996) [collection of essays]
‘Determinacy and Indeterminacy’, Organised Sound, i (1996), 143–55
B.A. Varga: Beszélgetèsek Iannis Xenakisszal (Budapest, 1982; Eng. trans., 1996, as Conversations with Iannis Xenakis)
M. Feldman: ‘A Conversation on Music’, Res, no.15 (1988), 177–81
E. Restagno: ‘Un’autobiografia dell’autore raccontata de Enzo Restagno’, Xenakis (Turin, 1988), 3–70
M. Harley: ‘Musique, espace et spatialisation’, Circuits, v/2 (1994), 9–20
P. Szendy: ‘Ici et là: entretien avec Iannis Xenakis’, Cahiers de l’IRCAM, no.5 (1994), 107–13
F. Delalande: Il faut être constamment un immigré: entretiens avec Xenakis (Paris, 1997)
ReM, no.257 (1963)
Nutida musik, x/5 (1966–7)
L’arc, no.51 (1972)
Nutida musik, xxviii/3 (1984–5)
MusikTexte, no.13 (1986)
Iannis Xenakis, Musik-Konzepte, nos.54–5 (1987)
Entretemps, no.6 (1988), esp. 57–143
Circuit, v/2 (1994)
Muzyka, no.3 (1998; forthcoming)
D. Charles: La pensée de Xenakis (Paris, 1970)
D. Halperin: L’oeuvre musicale de Iannis Xenakis (Jerusalem, 1975) [in Hebrew]
O. Revault d’Allonnes: Xenakis: Polytopes (Paris, 1975)
J. Ruohomki: Ylesiä pürteitä Iannis Xenakisen musiikillisesta ajattulesta metodeista ja teoksista (Helsinki, 1977)
M. Sato: Iannis Xenakis: sûgaku ni yori sakkyoku [Musical composition by mathematics] (MA diss., Tokyo U. of Fine Arts and Music, 1978)
H. Gerhards, ed.: Regards sur Iannis Xenakis (Paris, 1981) [incl. homages by M. Kundera, O. Messiaen and S. Ozawa]
N. Matossian: Iannis Xenakis (Paris, 1981; Eng. trans., 1984)
J. Vermeil: ‘Les demeures Xenakis’, Silences, no.1 (1985), 201–06
P.-A. Castanet: ‘L’organon, ou Les outils mathématiques de la création musicale’, Cahiers du CIREM, nos.1–2 (1986), 33–44
H. Lohner: ‘Xenakis and the UPIC’, Computer Music Journal, x/4 (1986), 42–7
P.-E. Gontcharov: Les percussions chez Xenakis (diss., U. of Paris IV-Sorbonne, 1988)
E. Restagno, ed.: Xenakis (Turin, 1988)
S.A. Joseph: The Stochastic Music of Iannis Xenakis: an Examination of his Theory and Practice (diss., New York U., n.d.)
A. Orcalli: Le hasard se calcule: una tesi di Iannis Xenakis (Padua, 1990)
F.-B. Mache: ‘De Nekuia à Dox Orkh, dix années de création’, Musica, Festival de Strasbourg (1991)
P. Oswalt: ‘Polytope von Iannis Xenakis’, Arch+, no.107 (1991), 50–54
A. Baltensperger: “‘Art” und “Science”’, NZM, Jg.153, no.5 (1992), 27–34
B. Gibson: Xenakis: organisation sonore, techniques d’écriture, orchestration (Paris, 1992)
N. Papoutsopoulos: ‘To Politopo ton Mykinon tou Ianni Xenaki’ [The Polytope de Mycènes by Xenakis], Sima [Athens], no.7 (1992), 46–7
G. Marino, M.-H. Serra and J.-M. Raczinski: ‘The UPIC System: Origins and Innovations’, PNM, xxxi/1 (1993), 258–69
M.-H. Serra: ‘Stochastic Composition and Stochastic Timbre: GENDY3 by Iannis Xenakis’, PNM, xxxi/1 (1993), 236–57
M. Solomos: A propos des premières oeuvres (1953–69) de I. Xenakis: pour une approche historique de l’émergence de phénomène du son (diss., U. of Paris IV, 1993)
S. di Biasi: Musica e matematica negli anni 50–60: Iannis Xenakis (Bologna, 1994)
R. Eichert: Iannis Xenakis und die mathematische Grundlagenforschung (Saarbrücken, 1994)
M.A. Harley: ‘Spatial Sound Movement in the Instrumental Music of Iannis Xenakis’, Interface: Journal of New Music Research, xxiii (1994), 291–314
P. Hoffmann: Amalgam aus Kunst und Wissenschaft: naturwissenschaftliches Denken im Werk von Iannis Xenakis (Frankfurt, 1994)
H. de la Motte-Haber: ‘Musikalische Architektur und architektonische Musik’, Neue Berlinische Musikzeitung, viii/1 (1994), suppl., 3–10
M. Solomos: ‘Les trois sonorités xenakiennes’, Circuits, v/2 (1994), 21–39
A. Di Scipio: ‘Da Concret PH a GENDY 301: modelli compositivi nella musica elettroacustica di Xenakis’, Sonus, xiv (1995), 61–92
C. Schmidt: Komposition und Spiel: zu Iannis Xenakis (Cologne, 1995)
A. Baltensperger: Iannis Xenakis und die Stochastische Musik: Komposition im Spannungsfeld von Architektur und Mathematik (Berne, 1996)
R. Frisius: ‘Xenakis und das Schlagzeug’, NZM, Jg.157, no.6 (1996), 14–18
M. Iliescu: Musical et extramusical: eléments de pensée spatiale dans l’oeuvre de Iannis Xenakis (diss., U. of Paris I, 1996)
M. Solomos: Iannis Xenakis (Mercuès, 1996)
B. Robindore: ‘Eskhaté Ereuna: Extending the Limits of Musical Thought’, Computer Music Journal, xx/4 (1996), 11–16
R.J. Squibbs: Analytical Approach to the Music of Iannis Xenakis: Issues in the Recent Music (Ann Arbor, 1996)
P. Hoffmann: ‘L’espace abstrait dans la musique de Iannis Xenakis’, L’espace: musique – philosophie: Paris 1997, 141–52
M. Iliescu: ‘Connotations socio-politiques de la conception massique de Xenakis’, L’espace: musique – philosophie: Paris 1997, 265–77
P. Hoffmann: Music out of Nothing? The Dynamic Stochastic Synthesis: a Rigorous Approach to Algorithmic Composition by Iannis Xenakis (diss., Technische U., Berlin, forthcoming)
M. Solomos: Du project bartókien au son: l’évolution du jeune Xenakis (forthcoming)
M. Solomos, ed.: Proceedings of the 1st International Xenakis Congress, Centre de Documentation de Musique Contemporaine, Paris, 1999 (forthcoming)
N. Kay: ‘Xenakis’s “Pithoprakta”’, Tempo, no.80 (1967), 21–5
T. Souster: ‘Xenakis’ “Nuits”’, Tempo, no.85 (1968), 5–18
K. Stone: ‘Xenakis: “Metastaseis, Pithoprakta, Eonta”’, MQ, liv (1968), 387–95
F. Vandenbogaerde: ‘Analyse de “Nomos alpha”’, Mathématiques et sciences humaines, no.24 (1968), 35–50
D. Sevrette: Etude statistique sur ‘Herma’ de Xenakis (Paris, 1973)
T. DeLio: ‘I. Xenakis’ “Nomos Alpha”: the Dialectic of Structure and Materials’, JMT, xxiv (1980), 63–86; repr. in Contiguous Lines, ed. T. DeLio (Lanham, MD, 1985), 3–30
J. Vriend: ‘“Nomos alpha”: Analysis and Comments’, Interface: Journal of New Music Research, x (1981), 15–82
P. Gervasoni: ‘“Idmem-Pléïades”’, Diapason-Harmonie, no.384 (1983)
T. DeLio: Structure and Strategy: Iannis Xenakis’ ‘Linaia-Agon’ (Maryland, 1985)
J. Papadatos: Werkanalyse zu Iannis Xenakis’ ‘Jonchaies’ (Examensarbeit, Staatliche Hochschule für Musik, Düsseldorf, 1985)
D.W. Yoken: Iannis Xenakis’ ‘Psappha’: a Performance Analysis (San Diego, 1985)
P.-A. Castanet: ‘“Mists”, oeuvre pour piano de Iannis Xenakis: de l’écoute à l’analyse, les chemins convergents d’une rencontre’, Analyse musicale, no.5 (1986), 65–75
J.-R. Julien: ‘“Nuits” de Iannis Xenakis: éléments d’une analyse’, Education musicale, no.325 (1986), 5–9; no.326 (1986), 9–12
O. Revault d’Allonnes: ‘“Thalleïn” de Xenakis’, InHarmoniques, no.1 (1986), 189–95
T. DeLio: ‘Structure and Strategy: Iannis Xenakis’ “Linaia Agon”’ Interface: Journal of New Music Research, xvi (1987)
J. Williams: ‘Iannis Xenakis: “Persephassa” an Introduction’, Percussive Notes (1987), 9–13
E.R. Flint: An Investigation of Real Time as Evidenced by the Structural and Formal Multiplicities in Iannis Xenakis’ ‘Psappha’ (diss., U. of Maryland, College Park, 1989)
C. Prost: ‘Nuits: première transposition de la démarche de Iannis Xenakis du domaine instrumental au domaine vocal’, Analyse musicale, no.15 (1989), 64–70
M. Malt: Trois aspects de formalisation dans ‘Achorripsis’ de Iannis Xenakis (Paris, 1991)
F. Jodelet: ‘Psappha’, Percussions, no.20 (1992), 9–15
J.-M. Thil: ‘“A Hélène” de I. Xenakis’, Education musicale, no.391 (1992), 5–6
J.M. Cubillas Morales: Iannis Xenakis, ‘Nomos Alpha’: una aproximacion inicial hacia el analisis de un encuentro, en el siglo XX, entre la musica y la matematica (Teoria de Grupos) (Valparaiso, 1993)
B. Larkin: ‘Analyse pour jouer “Psappha”’, Percussions, no.29 (1993), 7–11
M. Solomos: ‘“Persephassa” durée, geste et rythme’, Percussions, no.33 (1994), 11–19
J.-M. Chouvel: ‘A propos de “L’île de Gorée” de Iannis Xenakis’, Terres des signes, no.1 (1995), 169–73
See Hurtado de Xeres.
See South africa, §I, 1.
(b Macao, 13 June 1905; d Moscow, 30 Oct 1945). Chinese composer. Educated in music schools and conservatories in Canton (1918), Beijing (1926) and Shanghai (1928), he travelled to France in 1930 to study composition with d’Indy and Dukas and take violin lessons. After a period at the Paris Conservatoire he returned to Shanghai in 1935; he subsequently worked for the Pathé (Baidai) Record Company, headed the music section of the left-wing New China (Xinhua) Film Company, and composed many songs for use in anti-Japanese popular movements. With the outbreak of war with Japan in 1937, Xian moved to Wuhan then to the Communist headquarters at Yan'an, where he became head of music at Lu Xun College of the Arts (1938), composed several significant nationalistic compositions, such as the cantata Huanghe (1939), and encouraged the study of folk music so that it could be better adapted by reformist composers. In 1940 he moved to Moscow for further study, and remained in various parts of the Soviet Union and Mongolia until his death. As with his contemporary Nie Er, Xian’s image was held up after his death by the Communist Party as that of a model revolutionary musician: his present reputation in Chinese musical circles stems more from politically motivated discussions of his life and personality than from the impact of specific compositions.
While he attempted to craft artworks which he hoped would raise musical standards within China, Xian’s compositional style was essentially populist. His melodies commonly employ folk or folk-like material, and textures and structures, even in his larger-scale works, are typically simple and clearly articulated. His harmonic language reflects both the influence of his foreign studies and of his attempts to develop a style more closely according to Chinese thematic material.
(selective list)
Inst: Sym. no.1 ‘Minzu jiefang’ [National Liberation], 1935, rev. 1941; Sym. no.2 ‘Shenshang zhi zhan’ [Holy War], 1943; 3 Kazakh Dances, pf (1943); 4 sym. suites, 2 orchd |
Vocal: Feng [Wind], S, cl, pf, c1933; Huanghe [Yellow River] (cant., Guang Weiran), 1939, rev. 1941, arr. pf conc. 1969; 3 other choral works; 2 ops; c250 mainly film and mass songs and a few art songs surviving, incl. Dao diren houfang qu [Go to the Enemy’s Rear] (Zhao Qihai), 1938 |
R.C. Kraus: Pianos and Politics in China: Middle-Class Ambitions and the Struggle over Western Music (New York, 1989), 40–69
Wang Yuhe: Zhongguo jin- xiandai yinyuejia pingzhuan [A critical biography of modern and contemporary Chinese music] (Beijing, 1992), 181–205
JONATHAN P.J. STOCK
Vertical notched flute of the Han Chinese. The name xiao (which was the ancient name for panpipe) is onomatopoeic. The notched flute, historically known by names such as di, guan and chiba, was not called xiao until about the 12th century. It is one of the most venerated of Chinese instruments, possessing a pure and ‘natural’ tone quality (associated with bamboo) and embodying important associations with the Confucian ethos and cosmology. As known by the name di, the instrument was likened to the Confucian concept of di, a different character meaning ‘to wash away evil from the mind’. A later variant known as chiba was twice the length of the ‘yellow bell’ pitch (huangzhong, the foundation pitch of the empire calculated on a tube of 0·9 feet), sounding a root pitch one octave lower and thus achieving correspondence with the universe.
The present-day xiao is constructed of bamboo, with an inward-sloping notch at the upper end (to assist tone production), five frontal finger-holes plus one dorsal thumb-hole, and two or more tassel holes near the lower end. External lengths vary by region, the crucial measurement being the location of the lower tassel holes (which define the vibrating length), for D flutes usually between about 50 and 52 cm below the blow-hole, depending upon internal diameter. Range is about two octaves commonly (d' – e''').
Several basic regional types are usually identified, all with variant constructions. Most common is the zizhu (‘purple bamboo’) xiao, characteristic of the Jiangnan area of central-eastern China. Longest of the regional variants (about 75 cm or more), this type is constructed from a species of bamboo with long, straight internodal sections, and it has a U-shaped notch carved through the uppermost node (which otherwise closes off most of the opening). Refined in tone and moderate in volume, this xiao is performed solo, in duet with qin or zheng zithers, or in small ensembles. The second major type is the dongxiao, employed in nanguan music of southern Fujian and Taiwan. Shorter than the Jiangnan xiao (about 57 cm), the dongxiao is constructed from ‘stone bamboo’ or other relatively thick species, and has a U- or V-shaped notch (the top node completely open), the lower end cut from the bamboo root. In theory, the instrument should have ten nodal outcroppings, though some variants have only nine. Other variants include the slender yuping xiao, and the yaxiao (‘refined’ xiao), a 1930s semi-chromatic eight-hole flute adapted for performance with the qin zither.
The history of the Chinese vertical notched flute is one of constantly changing terminology. Inscriptions on oracle bones from after the 14th century bce reveal the names of two flutes, yan and guan. The Zhouli (c3rd–2nd centuries bce) and other classic texts mention the names di (a name later applied to transverse flutes) and guan (‘pipe’, a name later applied to reed-pipes). Both had finger-holes and presumably notches as well. The Zhou dynasty di must have been a four-holed flute, because during the Han dynasty (206 bce–ce 220) the poem Changdi fu (‘Long di poem’) reports that a fifth hole had been added (a thumb-hole at the back). Other writings of this period speak of another vertical flute, the six-holed qiangdi, an instrument of the Qiang tribal people of western China. This instrument was quite long and slender and may have been related to the unnotched vertical flute of Western Asia (Ney). But the Chinese vertical flute (di) was already documented in late Zhou literature as a standard instrument employed in ritual ensembles.
Because of its ritual use, the root pitch of the di was usually the same as the ‘yellow bell’ pitch (which changed from one dynasty to another). However, its roughly equidistant finger-hole positions obviously did not coincide with the accepted orthodoxy of circle-of-fifths temperament, because numerous attempts were made to correct this discrepancy.
During the Tang dynasty (618–907), the most significant type of vertical flute became known as chiba guan, or simply chiba (literally, ‘1·8 (Chinese) feet’). Preserved at the Shōsōin treasury in Japan are eight chiba (pronounced Shakuhachi in Japanese) dating from this period. They are of bamboo, jade, stone and ivory, between 34 and 44 cm in length, with outward-cut notches and five finger-holes plus one thumb-hole. After the Tang, the name chiba was found less frequently in the literature (perhaps because of changes in measurement systems), and by the 11th and 12th centuries the name dongxiao became more common. Among local musicians of southern Fujian province, both names are used.
That long, thin vertical flutes, known as shudi (‘vertical’ di) or changdi (‘long’ di) were also in use during the Tang is attested by representations in cave art and citations in period literature. According to the scholar Zhu Xi (1130–1200), the long flute was called xiao by his time (the term di increasingly being used to identify transverse flutes). A very few notched flutes constructed of porcelain, jade and bamboo survive from the 16th or 17th centuries. A larger number of 19th-century xiao are preserved in museums throughout China, North America and Europe, including handsome red-lacquered flutes decorated with gilded dragon motifs, taken from various Confucian shrines.
A.C. Moule: ‘A List of the Musical and other Sound-Producing Instruments of the Chinese Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, North China Branch’, xxxix (1908), 1–160; repr. separately (Buren, 1989)
Hayashi K. and others: Shōsōin no gakki [Musical instruments in the Shōsōin] (Tokyo, 1967) [with Eng. summary]
Cheung Sai-bung: Zhongguo yinyue shilun shugao [Historical studies of Chinese music] (Hong Kong, 1974–5)
Tong Kin-woon: Shang Musical Instruments (diss., Wesleyan U., 1983); repr. in AsM, xv/1 (1983), 166–73
Lu Songling: ‘Chiba chutan’ [Preliminary study of the chiba], Quanzhou lishi wenhua zhongxin gongzuo tongxun, no.1 (1985), 9–18
Liu Dongsheng and others, ed.: Zhongguo yueqi tuzhi [Pictorial record of Chinese musical instruments] (Beijing, 1987)
Liu Dongsheng and Yuan Quanyou, eds.: Zhongguo yinyue shi tujian [Pictorial guide to the history of Chinese music] (Beijing, 1988)
Liu Dongsheng, ed.: Zhongguo yueqi tujian [Pictorial guide to Chinese musical instruments] (Ji'nan, 1992), 114–15, 119–21
Zheng Ruzhong: ‘Musical Instruments in the Wall Paintings of Dunhuang’, CHIME, no.7 (1993), 4–56
Zhongguo yueqi zhi, qiming juan (aerophone vol.) [forthcoming]
Zhongguo yinyue wenwu daxi [forthcoming]
ALAN R. THRASHER
(b Tianjin, 9 April 1905; d Beijing, 26 Nov 1991). Chinese composer and educator. She was a prizewinning graduate of the Brussels Conservatoire Royale de Musique in 1932. From 1935 to 1954 she was married to the conductor Hermann Scherchen; the composer Tona Scherchen is their daughter. During the 1930s and 40s she spent 14 years in Switzerland, where she worked as a composer and was influential in promoting Chinese culture in Europe through her lectures and writings.
Her Chinese Children’s Suite and the orchestral suite Huainian Zuguo were among the first works by a Chinese composer to become known in the West. Her style combines Chinese folk materials with Western techniques, a concept later developed in her teaching of polyphony. In 1950, motivated by a desire to contribute to her country’s development, she returned to China with her three children. From that time until her death she taught composition at the Central Conservatory in Beijing, where she was regarded as inspirational to generations of Chinese composers. In addition to teaching, composing and writing, Xiao’s lifelong involvement with polyphony included translations into Chinese of Lendvai’s book on Bartók’s form and harmony (Beijing, 1979) and Koechlin’s Précis des règles du contrepoint (Beijing, 1986).
(selective list)
unless otherwise stated, all appear in following 2 collections and are undated
Collected Compositions (Central Conservatory of Music, Beijing, 1992) [A] |
Collected Polyphonic Works (Beijing, 1992) [B] |
|
Orch: Huainian Zuguo [A Commemoration of my Homeland], sym. suite, 1941 [A] |
Chbr: Fuge [Fugue], str trio [B]; Xintian You, str qt, trad. [B]; Huainian [Commemoration], pic, eng hn, cl, bn [B] |
Pf: Shan Ge [Mountain Song], Jiangxi trad. [A]; Xu Qu [Prelude], Yunnan trad. [A, B]; Cai Cha Wu [Tea Picking Dance], Yunnan trad. [A]; Kanong Xiao Qu [Little Canon], Hebei trad. [A]; Guang Deng [Walking among the Lanterns], Shandong trad. [A, B]; Gangqin Xiaozoumingqu [Sonatina] [A]; Xu Qu [A, B]; Shan Ge [B]; Song Lang [Seeing off a Sweetheart] [B]; Xiao Chuang Yi Qu [Little Invention] [B]; Er sheng bu Fuge [2-Part Fugue] [B] |
Songs (1v, pf): Chinese Children’s Suite, 1938 (Zürich, 1946); Yu Ye [Rainy Night] [A]; Manjiang Hong [All Red the River], trad., I, II [A]; Huaijiu [Remembering Old Times] [A]; Zizhu Diao [Purple Bamboo Melody] [A]; Yu bu Sa Hua Hua bu Hong [If the Rain doesn’t Fall, the Flowers won’t Bloom], Yunnan trad. [A]; Fengyang Huagu [Fengyang Flower Drum Dance], Anhui trad. [A] |
Choral: Qingzhu Jinxing Qu [Celebration March], 1v, SATB, pf [A]; Gong Nong Bing Gechang Qiyi [Workers’, Peasants’ and Soldiers’ Song], vv, pf [A]; Liubing [Skating], children's vv [B] |
GroveW(J. Lindorff) [incl. further bibliography]
S. Xiao: ‘La chanson populaire chinoise’, Sinologica: Zeitschrift für Chinesische Kultur und Wissenschaft, i/1 (1947), 65–86
Duan Pingtai: ‘ Qi Xiao Shuxian xian sheng’ [Introducing Professor Xiao], Journal of the Central Conservatory of Music, xi/2 (1983), 51–3
Liu Fushu: ‘Dao nian Xiao Shuxian dai jie’ [In memory of Xiao], Art of Music, no.49 (1992), 64–6
JOYCE LINDORFF
(b mainland China, 1906; d 1985). Chinese composer and teacher resident in Taiwan. In the late 1930s he studied music and theory in Japan; after working as a music teacher in Guangxi and Fujian, he moved to Taiwan in 1946. There he helped to establish the music department at Taiwan Normal University, devoting his attentions more to musicology and teaching than to composition. In a period when concert performances were rare and only included music by foreign composers, Xiao introduced his students to the works of mainland Chinese composers such as Huang Zi, Chen Tianhe, Liu Xue'an, Lin Shengshi and Zhao Yuanren. This exposure encouraged his students, including such important Taiwanese composers as Hsu Tsang-houei and Ma Shuilong, to compose in the new Chinese art music style. Xiao himself wrote mainly vocal music in the prevailing ‘pentatonic Romantic’ style, combining Western tonal harmony with Chinese pentatonic melodies. Some of his songs, such as his famous Fangong fuguo ge, carry political messages concerned with resisting communism and retrieving the motherland.
C.C. Liu Collection, Institute of Chinese Studies, University of Heidelberg.
Qiao Pei: Zhongguo xiandai yinyuejia [Contemporary Chinese musicians] (Taipei, 1976), 120–22
Hsu Tsang-houei: ‘Zhongguo xin yinyue shi: Taiwan bian 1945–85’ [History of new music in China: Taiwan], Zhongguo xin yinyue shi lunji, ed. Liu Jingzhi (Hong Kong, 1990), 211–32, esp. 230
You Sufeng: Taiwan jin sanshi nian ‘xiandai yinyue’ fazhan zhi tansuo 1945–1975 [Enquiries into the development of ‘modern music’ in Taiwan] (thesis, National Taiwan Normal U., 1990), esp. 1–29
Hsu Tsang-houei: ‘The Republic of China’, New Music in the Orient, ed. H. Ryker (Buren, 1991), 217–24, esp. 217
BARBARA MITTLER
(b Zaragoza, bap. 25 Dec 1601; d Zaragoza, 9 Aug 1672). Spanish composer and organist. He was probably a pupil of Aguilera de Heredia before becoming his assistant organist at the cathedral of La Seo in Zaragoza in 1620. In 1627 or 1628 he succeeded him as organist. In 1654 Ximénez was offered the position of organist at the royal chapel in Madrid but he declined and remained at La Seo until his retirement in January 1672.
Ximénez’s works, which are of moderate quality, include eight tientos, two batallas, one folia setting, one gaytilla and 11 sets of hymn and psalm versos, all for organ. Selections are published in F. Pedrell: Antología de organistas clásicos españoles, i (Barcelona, 1908) and in H. Anglés: Antología de organistas españoles del siglo XVII, i–ii (Barcelona, 1965–6).
ApelG
W. Apel: ‘Spanish Organ Music of the Early 17th Century’, JAMS, xv (1962), 174–81
W. Apel: ‘Die spanische Orgelmusik vor Cabanilles’, AnM, xvii (1962), 15–29
L. Siemens Hernández: ‘La Seo de Zaragoza, destacada escuela de órgano en el siglo XVII, I’, AnM, xxi (1966), 147-67
M.E. Sutton: A Study of the Seventeenth-Century Iberian Organ Batalla: Historical Development, Musical Characteristics and Performance Considerations (diss., U. of Kansas, 1975), 43–52
BARTON HUDSON
(b Mexico City, c1595; d Mexico City, 17 April 1654). Mexican composer and organist. From 1621 he held the position of second organist at Mexico City Cathedral, becoming first organist by November 1642. After the death of Luis Coronado, he was appointed maestro de capilla on 31 March 1648, and took as his assistant the nephew of his predecessor, Juan Coronado. He held this position, along with that of organist, until his death. During this period he trained his nephew, Francisco Vidales, who later became organist at Puebla Cathedral and a composer. Ximeno's successor was Francisco López Capillas. Influenced by Juan Gutiérrez de Padilla, Ximeno developed an interest in polychoral works. His numerous compositions include several masses, three Magnificat settings, two Lenten motets, a Dixit Dominus, two psalms for the Office of the Dead and a 5-part Christmas carol in the Galician dialect: Ay, ay, galeguiños ay que lo veyo.
MARK BRILL
See Xyndas, Spyridon.
(Sp.).
See Shawm.
(b Cuenca, c1639; d Cuenca, 26 June 1696). Spanish composer. He was maestro de capilla at Cuenca Cathedral from 3 September 1664 until 1675. Because of his excellent reputation he was offered the same post at Seville Cathedral, and served there from 29 April 1675 until 1 May 1684, when a kidney complaint caused his resignation. Returning to Cuenca, he was awarded various honours, including a benefice and a half-prebend, by the Bishop Alonso Antonio de San Martín. Xuares was renowned for his knowledge of scripture and classical learning; he carried on a weekly correspondence with Juan de Loaysa, librarian of the Biblioteca Colombina in Seville. His numerous extant compositions are notable for their liberal use of accidentals, rhythmic interest and contrasting textures.
6 masses, 8vv, insts; 5 Mag, 8–11vv, insts; 55 motets; psalms; 4 lamentations; other works; E-CU |
Missa sobre ‘Sancte Ferdinandae Rex’, 13vv; 17 motets, 7–8vv, bc; Sc |
Vulnerasti cor meum, 8vv, bc; Dum sacrum pignus, T, 4/4vv, bc; ed. in Lira sacro-hispana, 1st ser., Siglo XVII, i (Madrid, 1869) [no source indicated] |
Villancicos: En glorias de María, 4vv, D-Mbs; Venid venid zagales, 5vv, bc, ed. in Stevenson |
T. Muñoz y Soliva: Noticias de todos los Ilmos: Señores Obispos que han regido la diócesis de Cuenca (Cuenca, 1860), 319, 502
S. de la Rosa y López: Los seises de la Catedral de Sevilla (Seville, 1904), 154ff, 327
H. Anglès: ‘La música conservada en la Biblioteca Colombina y en la Catedral de Sevilla’, AnM, ii (1947), 3–39, esp. 37–8
R. Navarro Gonzalo and J. López Cobos: Catálogo musical del archivo de la Santa Iglesia Catedral Basilica de Cuenca (Cuenca, 1965, rev. 2/1973 by M. Angulo), 9
J. López-Calo: ‘Corresponsales de Miguel de Irízar’, AnM, xx (1965), 209–33
R.M. Stevenson: Christmas Music from Baroque Mexico (Berkeley, 1974), 41, 44, 75–6, 188–94
M. Martínez Millán: Historia musical de la catedral de Cuenca (Cuenca, 1988), 140–47, 196
ROBERT STEVENSON
(b Tokyo, 12 June 1944). Taiwanese composer. Self-taught apart from a few private composition lessons with Hsu Tsang-houei, he was instrumental in the promotion of contemporary music in Taiwan the 1960s. A founding member of the Asian Composers’ League, he staged a number of important Taiwanese avant-garde music festivals, such as New Environment for Asian Music in 1977, in cooperation with the composer Li Taixiang and the choreographer Lin Huaimin. In 1980 he founded New Aspect, the first weekly arts magazine in Taiwan, and initiated the first International Arts Festival. Out of these activities grew the New Aspect Arts Centre and Gallery (1983) and the New Aspect Cultural and Educational Foundation (1990), institutions responsible for much of the cultural activity of Taibei and Taiwan.
While Xu’s compositions are indebted to China’s traditional heritage, and especially that of Chinese opera, for instance in Zhongguo xiqu de yanxiang (1973) and the multimedia piece Sheng/Si (1974), they also bear testimony to his interest in the avant garde. He was one of the first Chinese composers to use synthetic sounds and the techniques of musique concrète in his compositions, notably in Dai Mian (1983) and Sheng/Si, and to apply avant-garde techniques to Chinese instruments, as in Pipa suibi (1975).
(selective list)
Stage: Guafu the Sun Chaser (ballet, Lin Huaimin), 1975; Mengtu [Dreamscape] (ballet, Lin Huaimin), 1985; Hui [Meeting], conceptual art, 1986; Loulan nü [Medea] (incid music), 1993 |
Orch: Pipa Conc, pipa, chbr orch, 1988; Tianyuan [Origin], trad. Chin. inst ens, 1988 |
Chbr and solo inst: Yun [Pregnant], pic, fl, cl, vn, va, vc, pf, perc, 1969; Wuren, Wudi [5 Men and 5 Flutes], 5 fl, 1973; Zhongguo xiqu de yanxiang [Meditation on Chinese Theatre], str qnt, 1973; Pipa suibi [Pipa Jottings], pipa, 1975; Si xiang [4 Dimensions], fl, huqin, perc, 1976; Yun [Even], perc ens, 1976; You yuan, jing meng [Wandering in the Garden, Waking from a Dream], fl, vn, va, vc, huqin, guzheng, xun, perc, 1982; Dai Mian [Mask], synth, perc, sheng, guzheng, xun, 1983; Qian [Submersion], str qnt, 1996 |
Vocal: Yuange xing [Resentment] (Li Bai), S, pf, 1962; Han Shi [Cold Food] (Luo Yan), 1v, (pf, wind insts, perc)/pf, 1974; Sheng/Si [Life and Death] (Luo Yan), chorus, huqin, guzheng, xun, cl, ob, bn, str trio, db, perc, tape, 3 echo machines, 1974; Jing [Moon Field], vv, perc, 1977 |
MSS in C.C. Liu Collection, Institute of Chinese Studies, U. of Heidelberg |
Cheng Pao-chuan: ‘Hsu Po-Yun, the ROC’s Impresario of the Arts’, Free China Review (1985), no.4, pp.56–61
B. Mittler: ‘Mirrors and Double Mirrors: The Politics of Identity in New Music from Hong Kong and Taiwan’, CHIME, no.9 (1996), 4–44, esp. 28–9
B. Mittler: Dangerous Tunes: the Politics of Chinese Music in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China since 1949 (Wiesbaden, 1997), 206–7, 336–7
BARBARA MITTLER
See Hsu Tsang-houei.
(b Suzhou, Jiangsu province, 2 June 1928; d 6 March 1984). Chinese Suzhou tanci ballad singer. Xu Lixian became a professional musician at 11, performing first with the foster couple to whom her impoverished natural parents had sold her. Her repertory at this time included folksongs, various excerpts from tanci and local opera, and contemporary popular songs.
In 1953 Xu Lixian joined the Shanghai People’s Pingtan Troupe (Shanghai Shi Renmin Pingtan Gonguzuotuan), encountering there many of the principal singers of the time. Her vocal style at this time combined the melodic character of Jiang Yuequan with the variation techniques of Xu Yunzhi. Xu Lixian was active both in the development of new repertory, such as a chronicle of the female revolutionary hero in The New Ballad of Mulan (Xin Mulan ci) (1959), and in the maintenance of the old. Among her innovations was the use of duet passages (tanci had formerly relied on solo singing, sometimes shared between two singers) in the ballad After the Bumper Harvest (Fengshou zhi hou) (1963).
During the Cultural Revolution (1966–76) Xu, like other Suzhou tanci musicians, was unable to perform. Resuming performance in 1978, her style after this enforced break was more experimental, setting aside traditional melodic and modal patterns in favour of a more individualistic compositional style. Over her whole career, Xu composed more than 6o large-scale ballads as well as many shorter works.
See also China, §IV, 1(ii).
Shanghai pingtan tuan, ed.: Xu Lixian changqiang xuan [Selected songs of Xu Lixian] (Shanghai, 1979)
Pan Huizhu: Innovation within Tradition: the Tanci (Chinese Suzhou Narrative Music) Style of Xu Lixian (MA thesis, U. of Maryland, Baltimore, 1988)
Zhongguo yinyue cidian, xubian [Dictionary of Chinese music, supplementary vol.], YYS pubn (Beijing, 1992), 211
PENG BENLE
Globular Flute employed in Han Chinese Confucian rituals. The xun (pronounced ‘hsün’) is an egg-shaped flute of baked clay, with a blow-hole at its apex and usually between three and eight finger-holes distributed in various patterns. Sizes vary between about 8 and 13 cm in height. Because of its globular wind chamber, the xun has a range of only about one octave, without usable overtones.
The ancient legacy of this ritual instrument in China is equalled only by the qing stone chime. Numerous small clay flutes, irregularly ball-shaped, egg-shaped and fish-shaped, have been found in Neolithic sites in and around Shanxi province, dating to c4000 bce and later. These ancient proto-xun flutes are between about 5 and 8 cm in height, each with one or two finger-holes. Instruments now identified as xun, found in late Shang sites (c1200 bce) of Henan province, are roughly the same size, though in shape of a large egg (standard thereafter), and generally with five finger-holes (three at the front, two at the rear). One important decorative characteristic found on some Shang instruments is the taotie design (face of a mythical animal, see illustration) on the outer surface.
The xun is mentioned frequently in Zhou literature. A note in the Erya (c3rd century bce) states that ‘a large xun is like a goose egg, with a flattened bottom and six holes; a small one is like a chicken egg’. The reference to ‘six holes’ almost certainly means five finger-holes (standard in archaeological finds) plus one blow-hole. The Han dynasty text Fengsu Tongyi (c175 ce) and other sources give specific measurements for the flutes of this period. Later sources, such as Yueshu (c1100), suggest that by the 12th century there were several varieties of xun, most slightly larger, with between six and eight finger-holes (for these and more recent developments, see Chuang, 1972).
The role of xun within the ritual ensemble of the imperial court is preserved today in the Confucian ritual in Taipei. Its significance within Confucian ideology is noted in the Shijing (‘Classic of Poetry’, c7th century bce): ‘the elder brother plays xun, the younger brother plays chi [transverse flute]’, with an explanation in the commentary that ‘our minds, as brothers, must be in harmony’, a metaphoric reminder of the need for social accordance within the family. Apart from its use in Confucian ritual, the xun has enjoyed a minor renaissance in China since the 1980s within the context of flute recitals.
Related historically is the chi (see China, §III; Di) and, outside China, the Korean hun, the Vietnamese huân and the Japanese tsuchibue.
Chuang Pen-li: ‘A Historical and Comparative Study of Hsün, the Chinese Ocarina’, Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, xxxiii (1972), 177–253 [with Eng. summary]
Cao Zheng: ‘Xun he xunde zhizuo gongyi’ [The xun and the art of its manufacture], Yueqi, (1982), no.4, pp.5–7; no.5, pp.4–6
Tong Kin-woon: Shang Musical Instruments (diss., Wesleyan U., 1983); repr. in AsM, xv/1 (1983), 152–66
Liu Dongsheng and others, eds.: Zhongguo yueqi tuzhi [Pictorial record of Chinese musical instruments] (Beijing, 1987), 25–34
Liu Dongsheng and Yuan Quanyou, eds.: Zhongguo yinyue shi tujian [Pictorial guide to the history of Chinese music] (Beijing, 1988), 10–12
Liu Dongsheng, ed.: Zhongguo yueqi tujian [Pictorial guide to Chinese instruments] (Ji’nan, 1992), 112–13
Li Chunyi: Zhongguo shanggu chutu yueqi zonglun [Survey of ancient excavated musical instruments from China] (Beijing, 1996), 386–407
ALAN R. THRASHER
(b Changchun, Jilin, 12 May 1961). Chinese composer. He studied composition with Ding Shande and Zhu Jian'er and took cello lessons at the Shanghai Conservatory (1979–83). After continuing there as a lecturer, he moved to Paris in 1988, where he studied at the Conservatoire with Malec, Jolas, Grisey and Bancquart; he remained in Paris to work as an independent composer. Many of his works have featured in festivals across Europe and have been awarded international prizes; his music is performed widely in Asia and Europe by symphony orchestras and contemporary music ensembles.
Xu’s early works such as the exquisite Waiting for Autumn (1986) and his ambitious Symphony no.1 (1986) betray influences ranging from Debussy to Takemitsu, but once in Paris, he began to count Malec, Höller and Parmegiani among his major sources of inspiration. He has frequently drawn ideas from Chinese Daoism, but for many years these were translated predominantly in terms of Western musical technique. Works like Choc (1989), Chute en automne (1991) and the brilliant, prize-winning Cristal au soleil couchant (1992) display a remarkable complexity, and his in-depth explorations into electronic music are unusual for almost any Chinese composer of his generation. By contrast, his works from the mid-1990s are increasingly based on materials taken from Chinese opera and folk music, and are often less dense in structure. In Vacuité/Consistance (1996) and Dawn on Steppe (1997) he recaptures the spirit of Chinese and Mongolian folk music, while retaining his superb command of modern instrumentation and counterpoint.
(selective list)
Orch: Vn Conc., 1982; Vc Conc. ‘Suo’ [Search], vc, 4 perc, pf, str, 1984–6; Fantasy in Autumn, vc, vib, cel, str, 1985; Waiting for Autumn, 4 pic, 2 perc, 2 hp, str, 1986; Sym. no.1 ‘Curves’, 1986; Cristal au soleil couchant, 1992; Dense/Clairsemé, b fl, orch, 1994–5 |
Chbr: Song of the Miao, str qt, 1982; Choc, 4 vc, 1989; Dongba, 10 insts, 1990; Chute en automne, ens, 1991; Echos du vieux champ, ens, 1992–3; Dongba II, 2 fl, str qt, perc, 1994; Changement/Constance, cl, eng hn, vn, vc, 2 synth, perc, 1994; San, ens, 1995; Vacuité/Consistance, pipa, zheng, ens, 1996 |
Vocal: Récit sur la vieille route, S, cptr, tape, 1996; Dawn on Steppe, male v, pipa, zheng, ens, 1997; Traces of Songs and Drums, 2 S, orch, 1997 |
Elec: Taiya, tape, 1990; Taiya II, fl, tape, 1991 |
Principal publisher: Gérard Billaudot |
FRANK KOUWENHOVEN
See Xylorimba.
(from Gk. xylon: ‘wood’; Fr. xylophone, claquebois; Ger. Xylophon, Holzharmonika; It. silofono).
Percussion instrument consisting of two or more bars of graduated length.
1. Distribution and classification.
4. South-east Asia and the Pacific.
LOIS ANN ANDERSON/R (1, 3–4), JAMES BLADES/JAMES HOLLAND (2), GEORGE LIST, LINDA L. O’BRIEN-ROTHE (5)
The xylophone may take several different types of construction and form: a set of bars of tuned bamboo, wood or synthetic material, logs or tubes, supported at two nodes of vibration and struck with sticks. There may be one resonator for the instrument (a pit or trough), or there may be individual resonators for each ‘key’. (For similar instruments made of stone or metal, see Lithophone and Metallophone).
In addition to Western art music, xylophones are found in Africa, Central and South America, South-east Asia (mainland and insular), Melanesia, and the Marquesas Islands in Polynesia. In Europe, xylophones are used in the traditional music of Hungary, Austria, the Czech Republic and other Eastern European countries. Many 20th-century composers have scored for the instrument.
Individual keys may be loose or may be temporarily or permanently attached to a support. They may rest on the legs or thighs of a player, on straw bundles, banana trees, a pit or a trough, or be suspended between supports. Between keys and support, there may be insulating material such as rubber or plastic knobs, grass bundles or strips of cloth to permit free vibration of the keys.
When the keys are suspended, the cord-and-key arrangement may be attached to the sides of a trough resonator or to vertical posts, or one end of the cord-and-key arrangement may be suspended from a vertical post and the other tied to the player’s leg or waist to form a curved arrangement. When played, the sounding bodies of the instrument are horizontal, oblique, curved or vertical in relationship to the ground. The instrument may rest on the ground, may be held in playing position by the performer, or may be suspended from a cord hung over his shoulders; the player may sit or stand facing the lengths or the widths of the keys. In the Western orchestral xylophone the keys are arranged as in a modern piano keyboard; elsewhere the key arrangement varies. One, two or three single beaters, or two pairs of beaters may be used to strike the middle or the edges of the keys; the ends of the beaters are usually wrapped with cloth or rubber if the keys are struck in the middle. One or more people may play the same instrument, or individual sounding parts of an instrument may be distributed among several players. They may be assigned single melodic lines (for one hand or two), octaves, interlocking patterns or rhythmic patterns.
Hornbostel and Sachs classified the xylophone as an Idiophone, ‘sets of percussion sticks’ (111.212), and divided xylophones into two major types: those with bedded keys and those with suspended keys. Olga Boone, in her study of xylophones in the Belgian Congo (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), published in 1936, delineated two major types: those with free keys and those with permanently fixed keys (the latter divided into those with and those without resonators); she paid particular attention to the ways in which keys and resonators were mounted or attached, tuning patterns, nomenclature and distribution.
In discussing the xylophone’s origins in Africa or Asia (based on published theories in favour of Asia), she felt that conclusions were premature and that other, non-musical evidence was needed to support any hypotheses. Later studies by A.M. Jones (1964) and P.R. Kirby (1966) favour Asian origin of the African xylophone but do not provide full supporting evidence. In India and China, the xylophone with trough resonator and suspended keys is considered a foreign instrument, Burmese in origin. Outside China, the xylophone with trough resonator and bedded keys is associated with Chinese communities. In West Java, for example, the Gambang xylophone is played by the leader of the ensemble (gambang leromong) that accompanies song and dance plays at Chinese weddings. As a solo instrument, the gambang was played by Javanese females of Chinese ancestry to accompany the singing of pantun poetry. In Japan, the mokkin with 16 or 17 bedded keys is used in the geza off-stage music for kabuki theatre. A similar xylophone was associated with Japanese societies that performed Chinese music of the Qing dynasty beginning in the 1820s and 30s.
An instrument that came into Rameau’s possession was also regarded as Chinese, though Rameau and later authors did not accept its Chinese provenance (see Schaeffner, 1955). In his discussion of Chinese tunings (Code de musique pratique, 1760), Rameau referred to it as orgue de Barbarie; he stated that it came from the Cape of Good Hope, and there is reason to believe, in the light of contemporary trade routes, that it may have been brought to the Cape from Java or some other part of the East Indies. After Rameau’s death (1764), Burney referred to such an instrument in the possession of Abbé Arnaud as Chinese (BurneyH, i, 46). A sketch of the instrument (fig.1) appeared in La Borde (Essai sur la musique ancienne et moderne, 1780) with the caption ‘Instrument Chinois’, noting that Rameau improperly called the instrument orgue de Barbarie, that it was brought from the Indies and that it belonged at that time to Arnaud. The sketch shows a xylophone with bedded keys, resting over a trapezoidal trough; the shape of the instrument appears to be related to that of similarly constructed xylophones in insular South-east Asia. The shape of the instrument’s base, the number of keys and the fanciful beaters provide possible further clues to its origin.
The first mention of the xylophone in Europe was in 1511, when Schlick (Spiegel der Orgelmacher und Organisten) referred to it as hültze glechter (‘wooden clatter’). Agricola (Musica instrumentalis deudsch, 1529) called a series of 25 wooden bars Strohfiedel. Praetorius (Theatrum instrumentorum, 1620) showed a series of 15 bars from about 15 to 53 cm in length, arranged diatonically, in a single row, pyramid fashion (as is Agricola’s). Mersenne (1636–7) illustrated and described two instruments (given as claquebois patouilles and eschelletes) on a grander scale. One has 17 bars, which are struck on the underside with individual beaters and arranged as a keyboard (fig.2). In general, however, the European xylophone before modern times was a simple instrument, the wooden slabs loosely strung together, or resting on ropes of straw, giving rise to the name ‘straw fiddle’ (Strohfiedel). It was very much an instrument of the itinerant musician until the 19th century, when it rose to prominence as a solo instrument and attracted the notice of Mendelssohn, Chopin and Liszt, all of whom spoke of the expertise of Michał Guzikow, a Polish Jew. Mendelssohn said, ‘I must own that the skill of the man beats everything that I could have imagined, for with his wooden sticks resting on straw, his hammers also being of wood, he produces all that is possible with the most perfect instrument’. Guzikow’s instrument consisted of a series of 28 crude wooden bars arranged semitonally, the four rows resting on five straw supports.
During the 19th century the xylophone appeared under various disguises (xylosistron, tryphon etc.). The orchestral instrument had four rows and was similar in many ways to that of Guzikow. The lowest notes were those nearest the player, with the centre two rows corresponding to the white notes of the piano and the outer rows the black keys. Ferdinand Kauer’s Sei variazioni (c1810) contain solo passages for the xylophone, possibly the earliest orchestral use of the instrument. In 1852 it was mentioned in J.-G. Kastner’s Les danses des morts. Better known is Saint-Saëns’s use of the instrument to represent the rattling of the bones of the dead in his Danse macabre (1872), and later (as ‘Fossiles’) in Le carnaval des animaux (1886). The playing technique of the four-row instrument was totally different to that of the modern xylophone, and apparently sightreading was particularly difficult. The modern xylophone originated around the turn of the century, although the four-row instrument is still used in Eastern Europe. Early 20th-century composers to use the xylophone include Mahler (Sixth Symphony, 1903–4); Puccini (Madama Butterfly, 1904); Strauss (Salome, 1903–5); Elgar (Wand of Youth, Suite no.2, 1908); Debussy (Ibéria, 1910); Stravinsky (The Firebird, 1909–10); and Delius (Eventyr, 1917). In his final work (Turandot, completed by Alfano, 1926) Puccini wrote for xylophone and xylofon basso (the latter part is usually now played on a marimba using fairly hard sticks). An extended (and florid) part for xylophone occurs in the third movement of Havergal Brian’s Symphony The Gothic (1919–27).
Complex writing for the xylophone has revolutionized its use compared with the demands of earlier composers, who, with occasional exceptions such as Stravinsky in The Wedding (1923), asked only for short passages. The demands on the modern xylophonist are heavy, especially in Tippett’s The Vision of St Augustine (1960–5) and many of his subsequent compositions, as well as works by Boulez and Messiaen. Boulez’s Le marteau sans maître (1953–5, rev. 1957) in particular was quite widely regarded as being unplayable when it was first published. Works using the xylophone as a solo instrument include Alan Hovhaness’s Fantasy on Japanese Woodprints (1965) and Thomas Pitfield’s Sonata for xylophone (1965). The keyboard xylophone is now virtually obsolete, the tone quality always having been very inferior; but Bartók scored for it (Tastenxylophon) in Bluebeard’s Castle (1911; nowadays the part is usually played on two xylophones).
The xylophone part is normally written (mostly in the treble clef) an octave lower than its sounding pitch, although both Messiaen and Birtwistle have mostly (but not always) notated xylophone parts at sounding pitch. Normally only one staff is used; rare exceptions include Ravel’s Ma mère l’oye (1908–10; ‘Laideronette’), where it is given a double staff.
The arrangement of the modern European instrument follows that of a piano keyboard, and, as is the practice with bar-percussion instruments, the bars are suspended from cords passing through their node points, or rest on a cushion of felt or similar insulation. In general the row of bars corresponding to the black notes of the piano is raised, keyboard fashion. The compass of the orchestral xylophones in general use is either four octaves ascending from c', or three and a half octaves ascending from f' or g'(fig.3). The larger instrument is preferable for the demands of modern composers. The bars are of the finest rosewood (or wood of a similar resonant and durable quality), or of new synthetic bar materials such as Kelon (a pultrusion silicate) or Klyperon, prepared from synthetic reinforced resins. Synthetic bars are generally regarded as having an inferior tone quality. The pitch of each bar is governed by its length and depth; the shallowing of the underside of the bar lowers the pitch considerably. In the modern orchestral xylophone each bar is suspended over a tube resonator in which the air-column frequency matches the pitch of the bar. The bars give a bright penetrating sound when struck with hardheaded mallets. Softer beaters produce a mellow sound and are specially useful on the lower notes.
Oral traditions mention the xylophone in the 13th-century kingdom of Mali; the first written reference, also from Mali, comes from the mid-14th century. Describing two Muslim festivals at the court, Ibn Battūta (Travels in Asia and Africa, trans. H.A.R. Gibb, 1929) mentioned an instrument made of reeds with small calabashes at its lower end. In the second half of the 16th century, dos Santos, a Portuguese missionary living among the Karanga in what is now Mozambique, mentioned the ambira, a gourd-resonated instrument. From the mid-17th century onwards, European travellers to the western coasts of the continent refer to the instrument, most often with calabash resonators; the most common names for it were bala, balafo(n) and ballard(s) in West Africa (see Balo) and marimba in the Bantu-speaking areas – the same terms used by writers referring to the instrument in the Caribbean and Central and South America.
Early 20th-century studies of the African xylophone in Europe paid particular attention to organological features of instruments in the Berlin and Tervuren museum collections. Olga Boone focussed on construction details and tuning measurements of xylophones of the Belgian Congo (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) according to ethnic origin, the distribution of xylophone types there and in other areas of Africa, and the social context of the instrument. She examined 108 xylophones at the Musée du Congo Belge (now the Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale) in Tervuren. In her descriptions, discussion proceeds from the simpler instruments to the more complex; however, she stated that her order of categories did not necessarily represent stages of evolution. The present discussion is primarily concerned with the physical characteristics of the instrument, based on the types distinguished by Boone; additional types are included for those instruments not found in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DROC). There are two main categories of xylophone: those with free keys, in which the keys are independent of each other and their support, and those with fixed keys, in which the keys are permanently attached between themselves and to their support.
For performance, loose keys are assembled on temporary supports, which may consist of the player’s legs, banana-tree trunks, straw bundles, or logs padded with grass. Keys may be completely loose with upright sticks placed between them to prevent their striking each other and stopping vibration. Alternatively, holes may be bored at the side of the key near each end through which a cord is strung and twisted around the dividing upright sticks. Sticks may also be placed vertically between keys at one side of the instrument and through a hole in the middle of each key at the other side. Keys are normally struck at their ends with wooden sticks.
A xylophone type intermediate between free and fixed keys is found among the Sena people in central Mozambique and the Lozi in western Zambia, where keys strung to each other are temporarily mounted on straw bundles; performers may strike the middles of the keys with wooden or rubber-tipped sticks.
(a) Leg xylophones. Keys are mounted on the player’s upper thighs, or (as in Madagascar), from the knees to the ankles. The instrument is played by young girls or boys as part of initiation activities in Senegal; it is also used as a device to keep birds and monkeys out of gardens. The instrument’s resonance may be enhanced by a depression in the ground, or by a pot or calabash placed underneath it (fig.4a). Two to seven keys are played by one or two players.
Distribution: Senegal, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, Benin, south-east Nigeria, Central African Republic, Zambia, Malawi and Madagascar.
(b) Pit xylophones. A pit may be an integral part of the free key xylophone. Four to 13 keys are mounted across grass bundles or banana-tree trunks placed at opposite sides of a pit. Among the Yoruba in south-west Nigeria and the Gun in south-east Benin, two such xylophones are played together, one or both instruments over a pit. If the instrument is large, the player sits between two groups of keys with his legs in the pit. This type of xylophone may be used as a practice instrument, as in north-west Ghana, where it is played by children, students of the instrument and adults without a gourd-resonating xylophone. Among the Luba of southern DROC, the tuning of the keys for an instrument which will have individual resonators is tested by laying them across a pit, mounting them on banana-tree trunks or across a calabash.
Distribution: Guinea, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Benin, Nigeria, Chad, Central African Republic, south-east Democrataic Republic of the Congo, north-west Uganda and southern Malawi.
(c) Log xylophones. Instruments consisting of free keys resting across banana-tree trunks, or a combination of straw bundles (for insulation) and banana-tree trunks, are found in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. They have from six to 22 keys, which are usually larger than those of any other type of African xylophone. It is common for two, or as many as six players, to interlock different melodic patterns on the same instrument (fig.5), or two players facing each other may each play one instrument (see fig.4b). The ends of the keys are usually struck with one or two plain wooden beaters.
Distribution: Guinea, Liberia, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Cameroon, Gabon, Central African Republic, Chad, northern Democratic Republic of the Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda and south-west Ethiopia.
Keys are mounted on runners, or a resonator, such as a box or trough, to which insulation material is attached. In north-west DROC, two pairs of beaters are used by one player, and adjacent keys are commonly tuned in octaves. The instrument on runners, found in north-west DROC and among the Yaka in south-west DROC, may have crosspieces at the ends to keep the runners apart. The instrument with keys resting on a trough resonator is found in north-west DROC, south-east Nigeria and central Mozambique. The box-resonated xylophone is found near the south-east coast of Kenya, on the islands of Zanzibar and Pemba and in north-east Tanzania. Among the Igbo of south-east Nigeria, two keys are attached to a grass collar which covers the top of an open clay pot.
A key is suspended from cords strung through holes near its ends and attached to the upper ends of two arcs glued to the top of the resonator. The player changes the instrument’s timbre by alternately closing and opening the mouth of the resonator with the left hand. The instrument may be played in groups of two or more, with each one tuned differently, and is commonly used at hunting ceremonies.
Distribution: south-east Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zambia and southern Malawi.
Parallel curved poles and two crosspieces form the support frame of an instrument with two calabashes. The ends of the cords which suspend the keys pass over the crosspieces and are tied to the ends of the poles, and the calabashes are suspended on rods placed in holes in each of the poles.
Distribution: among the Chokwe and Lunda of south-central Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Luvale of eastern Angola.
Instruments differ from area to area in their type of frame construction, and the attachment of keys and calabashes. Many xylophones in the DROC and its neighbouring areas have in common an arc, or bail, which is attached to the sides of the frame (see types 1–3, 5–6 below). The bail keeps the instrument in the proper playing position in front of the player when it is slung from his shoulders. When the player is seated, he may stabilize the instrument by balancing the bail with his feet. The keys may rest on some type of insulation material or on leather cords, or they may be suspended. Calabashes may be hung from the framework or glued to a frame; they are either suspended directly by rods, or by strings secured to rods fastened across a horizontal frame. The calabashes may be glued to a centre board, which may have holes to accommodate them. While a round or elongated calabash is the most common resonator, bamboo, cattle horn or wood is also used. Buzzing devices are attached to one or more holes in the bottom or at the side of each resonator; when they are attached to the side, ancillary tubes or round pieces of calabash may be added to protect the membranes. The instrument is played with one to four rubber-tipped beaters, and the keys are struck in the middle; occasionally two players may play the same instrument. Several different xylophones may be played in the same ensemble.
Type 1: with resonators suspended from rods (Boone 3a). Two runners are attached to the ends of the bail and insulation is fixed to their top edge; rods pierce the calabashes near their tops and pass through holes in the sides of the runners. Rattan is intertwined around the tops of the calabashes to secure them. The keys are strung together by cords and rest on the insulation. Some contemporary instruments do not have a bail but have been modified by the addition of legs inserted between the ends of the runners and the crosspieces at the end of the instrument, so that the player is in a standing position. Distribution: south central and south-east Democratic Republic of the Congo, south-west Zambia and southern Malawi.
Type 2: with suspended keys (Boone 3b). Parallel curved poles constitute the frame for this instrument. The keys are strung on two cords which pass over the crosspieces or ends of the bail and are tied to the ends of the poles and the crosspieces or ends of the bail. The calabashes are strung on cords and are fixed to a rattan cord encircling the poles. On large instruments with a more pronounced curve from the middle of the keys to either end of the instrument (found among the Lunda and Chokwe of Angola), the suspended calabashes are supported by rods which pass through holes in the poles; the suspended keyboard is held firm by another cord which goes through the cord on the underside of the keys and is attached to the poles. On the xylophone of the Nsenga people in central Zambia, the cord from the underside of the keys to the runners also secures the rods that suspend the calabashes. This instrument is fixed between poles set vertically in the ground, and the keys are also hung vertically; on the Lunda and Chokwe instruments, the plane of the keys is oblique to the ground. When two Chokwe instruments are played together, the second may consist only of keys suspended between vertical poles, with a round pit in the ground below the middle of the keyboard. Distribution: south-west Democratic Republic of the Congo, eastern Angola and central Zambia.
Type 3: with quadrilateral frame. This combines characteristics of types (1) and (2), and appears to have been modified early in the 20th century. The support now consists of a four-sided frame with parallel ends whose sides taper towards the smallest keys. A bail is attached to the ends of the frame, and insulation material is fixed to the upper edges of its sides. The calabashes are suspended from rods placed in holes in the sides of the frame and are hung below their respective keys in order to obtain the best vibration. Thus the arrangement of the resonators is staggered. The keys formerly rested on the insulation material, a cord passing through a hole in the far side of the key, under another cord attached to the insulation material, back to the surface through the same hole, and under the insulation cord between keys; on the near side, a cord went over the key and through the insulation material between keys. An additional pair of thicker cords is now added to suspend the keys from the top, passing through the key attachment cords. In effect, the thin cords become loops for the suspension cords between keys and between the holes. The suspension cord passes under a thin cord strung through two vertical holes on the far side of the key, and is knotted to the thin cord between keys; on the near side, the thick cord passes through the thin cord between keys.
Groups of four or five different sizes of these xylophones are part of the mendzan ensemble in Cameroon and Gabon; each instrument has its own name and may overlap in pitch with the instrument next in size. One such ensemble in Cameroon has individual instruments with 11, 11, 10, 4 and 4 keys, while such an ensemble in Gabon consists of instruments with 9, 9, 8, 6 and 2 keys. Reserve keys are added to the larger instruments during construction. Thick beaters made of soft wood are used to strike the middle of the keys. Distribution: south and south-central Cameroon and northern Gabon.
Type 4: with calabashes suspended obliquely. Two horizontal poles extending through holes in side pieces that rest on the ground form the support for this instrument, which is over six feet long. Elongated calabashes, with an oblique cut at one side of their mouths, are suspended from the pole nearest the player and are secured by a thick supporting rope of braided bark to the second pole, so that they are almost parallel to the ground when the instrument is in a playing position. The 21 or 22 rectangular keys rest on thongs stretched across the poles, and are tuned to a heptatonic scale by thinning the centre of the playing side to leave a raised portion from the nodal point to each end, where designs are carved. The keys are strung together by a thong which passes through a hole in the flat section of the key at the edge of the raised portion, goes around the support thong and passes back to the surface through the same hole. The instrument is played by two men, using a total of five beaters. The player of the highest-pitched keys begins the performance with an ostinato pattern played in octaves or other intervals, or with a single melodic line distributed between his two hands. The player of the lowest keys interlocks a different melodic pattern with his right hand, and adds a rhythmic bass pattern characterized by repeated pitches with two beaters in his left hand. The ends of these beaters are crossed in his hand so that they are spread in an angle of almost 90°, facilitating wide leaps. The Venda instrument, mbila mtondo, was formerly an important instrument played at the chief’s kraal. Distribution: northern Transvaal, among the Venda, Kwebo and Lovedu.
Type 5: with centre board and bridges (or distance pieces) (Boone 3c). The frame of the instrument consists of a flat centre board with calabash resonators inserted into circular holes, and wooden bridges tied across the board between the holes. The ends of the bridges are tied to each other by leather thongs, which extend the length of the instrument and also serve as tension thongs to support the keys which are strung together by another set of cords. On some instruments insulation is attached to the edges of the centre board. The calabashes are fixed to the centre board by resin applied to the edges of the holes on both sides of the board. In Nigeria, the resonators are long and slender calabashes, cowhorns (for illustration see Nigeria, §8, fig.2) or wooden cones in the shape of cowhorns. For the ten-key instruments of the Azande in north-east DROC, a pair of beaters in each hand enables the player to strike octaves on adjacent keys. The most common tuning pattern (where numbers indicate the degree of the pentatonic scale) is: 2.2'.3.3'.4.4'.5.5'.1'.1, with the lowest octave pair on the player’s right. Among the Chopi of Mozambique, the centre board has two tenons on each end that fit into holes in the legs of the instrument, while the ends of the curved or rectangular bail fit over the tenons. The keys rest on tension thongs and are supported by thin wooden bridges attached by fibre to the centre board between each pair; the tension thongs pass through holes near the ends of the bridges. The keys are strung together by a pair of long leather cords. The cord further from the player passes through a hole in the key, under the supporting tension thong and back to the surface through the same hole; the near cord goes over each key and under the tension thong between keys (figs.7 and 8); see also Marimba, §1, fig.1). Distribution: (with bridge between keys): east central Nigeria, northern Cameroon, southern Chad, south-west Central African Republic, north-east Democratic Republic of the Congo and southern Sudan; (with bridge between pairs of keys): southern Mozambique and northern Transvaal.
Type 6: with centre board and insulating cushions (Boone 3d). This instrument is similar to the preceding one, except that the keys rest on insulating cushions mounted at some distance parallel to and on either side of the centre board, rather than on cords stretched between bridges. The centre board and the insulating cushions, which consist of fibre, bark cloth or some other type of material covering wooden branches, are attached to the ends of the curved bail, though on some instruments the insulation is attached to the edges of the centre board. Some instruments have bridges; some have calabashes suspended from a piece of rattan, the ends of which are inserted into the insulating cushions. In some areas, four beaters are used by each player. In north-west DROC, adjacent keys are tuned in octaves, usually in the order: 2.2'.3.3'.4.4'.5.5'.1'.1. Distribution: north-west Democratic Republic of the Congo, south central Central African Republic and southern Chad (with bridges).
Type 7: with centre board set within oval frame. An oval-shaped wooden bar surrounds the entire instrument. The keys are suspended, and the cowhorn resonators are glued and tied to the solid curved base, the back of which is etched with abstract designs. Six to eight keys are encircled by cords near the ends of each key, and the ends of the cords are attached to the oval frame; they are in an oblique position to the mouths of the resonators. The seated player supports the instrument between his knees at the middle of the oval frame, and a pair of Y-shaped wooden beaters allows him to strike octaves simultaneously. The keys on a Bura instrument, the tsindza, are arranged: 3.4.5.1'.1.2'.2. Distribution: north-east Nigeria.
Type 8: with open frame. Keys are mounted on an open framework consisting of four vertical and eight horizontal strips of wood lashed together. Round calabash resonators are suspended below each key by means of suspension rods that extend across and beyond the limits of the upper horizontal frame. In order to accommodate all the resonators within the framework, they are arranged in zigzag fashion, forming two rows. The suspension rods for the resonators are secured to the frame by leather strips; another long cord or leather strap serving as insulation for the resting keys then passes over the rods and a third long twisted cord secures the keys together on each side of the instrument. The latter cords are tied to the tops of the vertical posts, and sometimes also to the horizontal crosspieces at each end of the instrument. The physical size of the instrument varies. The smaller instruments (in the west and central area of distribution) may rest on the ground, or be slung from the shoulders with the instrument perpendicular or parallel to the body. The surface of the keyboard is slightly curved at the broader end of the instrument, where ogee-shaped horizontal crosspieces also accommodate the larger calabashes within the frame. The larger instruments (in the eastern area of distribution) rest on the ground in performance. The curvature of the keyboard is more pronounced, allowing room for the large resonators and making the entire keyboard easily accessible. The number of keys ranges from 12 to 21. Tuning is predominantly heptatonic, though the instruments of Burkina Faso, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire are pentatonic. The player uses a pair of rubber-tipped beaters, and may also wear bells around his wrist. The generic term for the instrument is balo or bala. In the eastern area of distribution, a commonly used term is gyil, with prefixes or suffixes to denote specific types, sizes or contexts of usage. Xylophones are often played singly or in groups with other instruments. To the west, among Manding-speaking peoples, it is often played by professional musicians of the jali caste; in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, it is an important instrument at funeral ceremonies. Distribution: Senegal, the Gambia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia, north-east Côte d’Ivoire, Mali, south-west Burkina Faso and north-west Ghana.
Of the many different types of xylophones found in this area, the instrument with keys resting on cloth or rattan strips at the edges of a wooden trough (trough xylophone with bedded keys) is commonly associated with Gamelan and other ensembles in various parts of Indonesia. Xylophones with suspended keys or tubes are found in the greatest variety. A few examples of a type with keys suspended over individual resonators are found in Bali (e.g. in gamelan gandrung), but that island’s most ancient ensembles (caruk, gambang and luang) have a trough-resonated xylophone with suspended keys. A common term for the xylophone in South-east Asia is gambang (gabbang, gambangan), but it may mean a different type of instrument depending on the ensemble in which it is used; in Sabah, Malaysia and the southern Philippines, gabbang always refers to a trough xylophone with bedded keys, played with rubber-tipped beaters which are curved on the underside and delicately carved in a bird- or kidney-shape.
Comparatively few xylophone types are found on the mainland. A two- or four-key xylophone has been reported in West Malaysia. Suspended tubes or wooden keys in a rope ladder arrangement are found in central Vietnam and north-east Thailand. Among the Jörai, Bahnar and Rhade people in Vietnam, the torung consists of 14 to 20 tubes suspended between the two players, one of whom holds an end of the cord; the other end is tied to the second player’s leg. In Thailand, the kaw law or bong lang with 12 wooden keys is played by the Lao people in Kalasin province. The upper end of the instrument is tied to a tree and the lower end to the player’s leg. These instruments resemble the calung renteng of West Java.
Groups of ten players, each with a xylophone with one key suspended over a coconut resonator (kertuk kelapa), compete with similar groups in West Malaysia; two such instruments may also accompany the harvest dance. The trough-resonated xylophone, Gambang, with bedded keys is found only in the Malaysian court gamelan of Trengganu, where it accompanies the joget dance. The xylophone with keys suspended over a trough resonator is important in instrumental ensembles in Thailand, Cambodia and Laos, and is also used for chamber music in Myanmar. The ranāt ēk (see Ranāt) is featured in the Thai pī phāt and mahōrī ensembles. It has 21 keys suspended over a curved resonator and resting on a pedestal. In some types of pī phāt a larger xylophone (ranāt thum) is added (fig.9); 16 keys are suspended over a rectangular shaped resonator, with sloping sides and a curved upper surface. The same type of xylophone may have been used in an ensemble that accompanied the ashek dance at the 16th- and 17th-century Malay court of Patani, and later at the Kelantan court (see Malaysia, §I, 1(iv)).
In Myanmar, the pat-talà with 20 to 25 (usually 24) keys suspended over a curved resonator and resting on a pedestal is played with the end-blown flute (palwei), or in chamber music as vocal accompaniment; it is taught by hsaìng-waìng musicians as a beginner’s instrument. It was also played at the Chinese court during the Qing dynasty (1644–1911); a description (in the Da Qing huidian, 1899) of the smaller of two Burmese ensembles that played for banquets includes the 22-key ‘pat-talà’, as well as harp, the mí-gyaùng zither, a three-string bowed lute, the palwei flute, a drum and a pair of cymbals.
The leg xylophone is found in scattered areas in west Melanesia, and is used primarily for courtship; in some areas, women are not allowed to see it. The instrument has been found on the Gazelle Peninsula of New Britain, on New Ireland, the Duke of York Islands and Tami Island, and in Morobe Province of eastern Papua New Guinea. Usually two wooden keys (convex on the upper side, flat on the under side) are laid over the player’s thighs and are struck with two sticks. The player may sit with his legs over a pit or over a mound of earth; alternatively, the keys may rest on banana trees or wooden branches. Names for the instrument include tinbuk, timbuk, timbul, tinbut, timboik, tutupele, or lau lau. The two-note instrument is used for playing signal patterns. On New Ireland and the Duke of York Islands, the xylophone is played for dancing; only on Tami Island have women been known to play the xylophone. Its sound draws the attention of males undergoing initiation to the women’s presence, and thus keeps them apart.
The xylophone in Latin America, known as the ‘marimba’, is found in Mexico, Belize, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil; in Suriname (as gambang) it is used in gamelan ensembles by musicians of Javanese descent. In Brazil, however, it has lost its former importance as a solo instrument, and is now used only to accompany such dramatic dances as the congada. The two types of marimba still in use are portable and have six and eleven keys respectively, struck with wooden sticks.
In Guatemala, the marimba is the most popular folk instrument, and has come to be a symbol of the independence of the Guatemalan Republic (see Guatemala, §II, 1). It is believed to be of African origin, introduced during the early colonial period by African slaves. This argument, which is not undisputed, rests mainly on the similarity of the marimba de tecomates (the original form of the Guatemalan instrument) to African xylophones, the African derivation of the word ‘marimba’ and the lack of archaeological evidence for the existence of marimbas in pre-Columbian America.
The earliest account of the marimba in Guatemala is found in the work of Domingo Juarros, a 17th-century historian, who lists it among instruments played by Amerindians in 1680. During the 18th century it became widely dispersed among Amerindians, and its presence is noted at public events, both civil and religious. The growing popularity of the marimba among Ladinos in the 19th century led to the expansion of the keyboard to five and, later, six and seven octaves, allowing the addition of a fourth player to the normal practice of two or three players. During the celebration of national independence in 1821, the marimba took its place as the national instrument.
In the highlands of Chiapas in Mexico, in Guatemala, in north-west Costa Rica and south-west Nicaragua near Masay, marimbas show resemblance to African xylophones. The marimba de tecomates is a xylophone consisting of a keyboard of parallel tuned wooden bars or percussion plates suspended above a trapezoidal framework by cords which pass through threading pins and the nodal points of each key (fig.10). Beneath each key hangs a tuned calabash resonator, near the base of which a vibrating membrane of pig intestine is fixed to a ring of wax surrounding an aperture. This functions as a mirliton or sound modifier that produces a characteristic buzzing called charleo when the keys are struck. The older form of this marimba, the marimba de arco, is portable, and is carried by means of a strap attached to the ends of the frame and passing across the player’s shoulders. The keyboard is kept from touching the player’s body by an arched branch (arco) which is fixed to the framework on the plane of the keyboard. A later type has four legs and lacks the arco. The nearly diatonic keyboard contains 19 to 26 keys. A key’s pitch may be raised during performance by applying a lump of wax, sometimes mixed with bits of lead, to its underside. For this reason such marimbas are called marimba de ceras (‘of wax’). The keys are struck with mallets (baquetas) made of flexible wooden sticks with strips of raw rubber wrapped round the ends to form a ball. The tips of the mallets intended for bass keys are soft; those for treble keys are harder and smaller. From one to three players hold a mallet in each hand, or two in one hand, and one in the other, the pair of mallets held in one hand often striking different keys at the same time. Other pitches may be produced by striking the extreme ends of the keys with the wooden end of the mallet. While the marimba de tecomates is now seldom played by Guatemalan Ladino musicians, who prefer the more Westernized forms of the instrument, in Amerindian highland Guatemala the surviving repertory is different from that of the rest of Mexico and Central America, some of it distinct from European tradition. It serves in both public and ritual contexts.
During the last quarter of the 19th century, the marimba sencilla was developed, in which cajones harmonicos, wooden boxes constructed to resemble gourds, were substituted for the gourd resonators. In other particulars of construction and tuning, the marimba sencilla is identical to the marimba de tecomates. During this period, the marimba de cinchos (also called marimba de acero, marimba de hierro) with metal keys and box resonators, became popular, and was played with guitar accompaniment. Types with glass keys, and others with bamboo-tube resonators, were also developed.
The addition of chromatic keys to the diatonic keyboard was a late 19th-century development, usually attributed to Sebastian Hurtado in 1894. The name of this type, marimba doble, refers to the double row of keys for diatonic and chromatic pitches. Unlike the arrangement of a piano keyboard, in which sharp keys fall to the right of their corresponding naturals, in many Guatemalan instruments the sharps are placed directly behind the naturals.
The marimba doble is often played in pairs: the larger, the marimba grande, has a range of six and a half octaves (about 78 keys) and uses four players; the smaller, the marimba cuache (also called marimba picolo, marimba requinta, marimba tenor), has a range of five octaves (about 50 keys) and uses three players. To these two instruments are often added a three-string bass, snare or bass drums, cymbals, accordion and wind instruments such as saxophones, trumpets or clarinets. While the folkloric character of contemporary marimba doble ensembles is somewhat obscured by the influences of popular Latin American and North American styles on its instruments and repertory, highland village marimba sencilla ensembles still maintain traditional style and repertory.
The marimba in Colombia may have as many as 25 keys or as few as 21, though 24 is usual. The keys are made of various palm woods, but most frequently of chontaduro. Each key has a resonator consisting of a section of guadua bamboo. The keys are placed on the frame in a single row in groups of four, each group being separated from the other by a pasador (crosspiece) of chonta. The pasadores are part of the framework that supports the keys and resonators and also function as points of visual reference for the players. Beginning at the top of the keyboard with the smallest key and moving downwards, the groups of four keys are known alternately as tablas duras and tablas blandas (i.e. hard and soft). In a group of eight the highest dura and the lowest blanda form an octave. A keyboard of 24 keys is thus composed of three disjunct octave segments: 8765 4321, 7654 3217, 6543 2176. The seven highest keys are tuned to produce approximate neutral 3rds between keys 8, 6, 4, 2 and keys 7, 5, 3. The remaining keys are tuned in octaves with the keys above them. On the marimba itself the keys are of course arranged in reverse order from that indicated above. The highest octave segment is to the right and the lowest to the left. Each of the two players uses two sticks tipped with small balls of raw rubber; one plays the bordón (an ostinato lower part), the other the requinta or tiple (upper part).
The marimba-orquesta, an ensemble incorporating a marimba, is widespread; such groups are widely popularized in Mexican tourist centres. The instruments are frequently municipal property, and musicians may be exempt from certain other civic responsibilities by virtue of their service in these groups. The ensemble plays music from the son repertory, and makes constant use of Corrido accompaniments. The tradition is strongest in the state of Chiapas and, until recently, in the southern half of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec where it is being replaced by ensembles playing música tropical. The term marimba refers both to the instrument and collectively to the musicians of the ensemble, while the musicians individually are called marimbistas.
In the urban centres of Mexico and Guatemala, the marimba ensemble is principally an interpretative medium rather than a primary source of original music. In its repertory, the marimba is greatly influenced by popular styles but itself exerts little influence on other styles. It is a regional ensemble, but unlike others, it has an unlimited eclectic non-regional repertory, as well as a small, limited core repertory of sones exclusively typical of marimba ensembles. Marimba ensembles commonly play mainstream popular music including rock, tropical and other styles. The ensemble is flexible and may include electric guitars, electronic keyboards, etc. National popularity and prestige are won by those who are recorded commercially, most of whom are recruited in Chiapas, Mexico, where marimba ensembles develop markets through public performances. The majority of marimba ensembles are financially marginal. The marimba players wear no traditional costume, and seldom have accompanying singers, although the combination of mariachi ensemble and marimba is gaining popularity.
In Colombia and Ecuador, the marimba tradition is found exclusively among peoples of coastal African cultures.
BladesI
MersenneHU
PraetoriusSM, ii
PraetoriusTI
SachsH
C. Sachs: Handbuch der Musikinstrumentenkunde (Leipzig, 1920, 2/1930/R)
C. Sachs: Geist und Werden der Musikinstrumente (Berlin, 1929/R)
G. Jacob: Orchestral Technique (London, 1931, 3/1982)
A. Schaeffner: Origine des instruments de musique (Paris, 1936/R, enlarged 3/1994)
A. Schaeffner: ‘L’orgue de barbarie de Rameau’, Mélanges d’histoire et d’esthétique musicales offerts à Paul-Marie Masson (Paris, 1955), ii, 135–52; repr. in Essais de musicologie et autres fantasies (Paris, 1980)
B. Sárosi: Die Volksmusikinstrumente Ungarns (Leipzig, 1967)
E. Richards: World of Percussion (Sherman Oaks, CA, 1972)
L. Kunz: Die Volksmusikinstrumente der Tschechoslowakei (Leipzig, 1974)
J.A. Strain: ‘Published Literature for Xylophone (c1880–c1930)’, Percussive Notes, xxxi/2 (1992), 65–98
E.M. von Hornbostel: ‘The Ethnology of African Sound-Instruments’, Africa, vi (1933), 129–57, 277–311
P.R. Kirby: The Musical Instruments of the Native Races of South Africa (London, 1934, 2/1965)
O. Boone: Les xylophones du Congo Belge (Tervuren, 1936)
S. de Ganay: ‘Le xylophone chez les Sara du Moyen Chari’, Journal de la Société des africanistes, xii (1942), 203–39, pl.8
B. Costermans: ‘Muziekinstrumenten van Watsa-Gombari’, Zaire, i (1947), 515–42, 629–63
H. Tracey: Chopi Musicians: their Music, Poetry and Instruments (London, 1948/R)
W. Fagg: ‘A Yoruba Xylophone of Unusual Type’, Man, l (1950), 145 only
F.-J. Nicolas: ‘Origine et valeur du vocabulaire designant les xylophones africains’, Zaire, xi/i (1957), 69
F.J. de Hen: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Musikinstrumente aus Belgisch Kongo und Ruanda-Urundi (Tervuren, 1960)
D.T. Niane: Soundjata: ou l’épopée mandigue (Paris, 1960; Eng. trans., 1965/R)
L. Bouquiaux: ‘Les instruments de musique Birom (Nigeria Septentrional)’, Africa-Tervuren, viii/4 (1962), 105–11
A.M. Jones: Africa and Indonesia: the Evidence of the Xylophone and Other Musical and Cultural Factors (Leiden, 1964, enlarged 2/1971)
P.R. Kirby: ‘The Indonesian Origin of Certain African Musical Instruments’, African Studies, xxv (1966), 3
Folclore musical de Angola/Angola Folk-Music, ii: Povo Quico area do Camissombo, Lunda/Chokwe People, Camissombo Area, Lunda District (Lisbon, 1967) [incl. recordings]
L.A. Anderson: ‘A Reassessment of the Distribution, Origin, Tunings and Stylistic Criteria in African Xylophone Traditions’, African Studies Association XI: Los Angeles 1968 [unpubd paper]
L. Anderson: The Miko Modal System of Kiganda Xylophone Music (diss., UCLA, 1968)
P.R. Kirby: ‘Two Curious Resonated Xylophones from Nigeria’, African Studies, xxvii/3 (1968), 141–4
F. Bebey: Musique de l’Afrique (Paris, 1969; Eng. trans., 1975 as African Music: a People’s Art)
G. Rouget: ‘Sur les xylophones équiheptaphoniques des Malinké’, RdM, lv (1969), 47–77
H. Zemp: Musique Dan: la musique dans la pensée et la vie sociale d’une société africaine (Paris, 1971)
G. Innes: Sunjata: Three Mandinka Versions (London, 1974)
P.-C. Ngumu: Les mendzang: des chanteurs de Yaoundé: histoire, organologie, fabrication, système de transcription (Vienna, 1976)
N. McLeod: ‘Musical Instruments and History in Madagascar’,Essays for a Humanist: an Offering to Klaus Wachsmann, ed. C. Seeger and B. Wade (New York, 1977), 189–215
M. Omibiyi: ‘Nigerian Musical Instruments’, Nigeria Magazine, cxxii–cxxiii (1977), 14–34
J. Gansemans: Les instruments de musique Luba (Shaba, Zaire) (Tervuren, 1980)
J. Meel: ‘Verspreiding en verscheidenheid van de xylofoon in Afrika’, Africa-Tervuren, xxvi/3 (1980), 79
A.A. Mensah: ‘Gyil: the Dagara-Lobi Xylophone’, Journal of African Studies, ix/3 (1982), 139–54
R. Shelford: ‘An Illustrated Catalogue of the Ethnographical Collection of the Sarawak Museum: Musical Instruments’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, xl (1904), 3–59
C. Sachs: Die Musikinstrumente Indiens und Indonesiens (Berlin, 1915, 2/1923/R)
W. Kaudern: Musical Instruments in Celebes (Göteborg, 1927)
J. Kunst: Hindoe-Javaansche muziek-instrumenten (Weltevreden, 1927; Eng. trans., enlarged 2/1968)
J. Kunst: A Study on Papuan Music (Weltevreden, 1931/R)
J. Kunst: De toonkunst van Java (’s-Gravenhage, 1934; Eng. trans., enlarged 3/1973)
N.J. Lan: ‘Chinese Songs and Plays in Batavia’, China Journal, xxiii/4 (1935), 198
H. Fisher: Schallgeräte in Ozeanien (Strasbourg and Baden-Baden, 1958)
P. Collaer: Ozeanien, Musikgeschichte in Bildern, i/1 (Leipzig, 1965)
J. Maceda: ‘Classification and Distribution of Musical Instruments in the Philippines’, The Musics of Asia: Manila 1966, 24–37 [summary in EthM, xi (1967), 107–13]
K.A. Gourlay: A Bibliography of Traditional Music in Papua New Guinea (Port Moresby, 1974)
E.A. Manuel: ‘Toward an Inventory of Philippine Musical Instruments’, Asian Studies, xiv (1976), 1–72
M. McLean: An Annotated Bibliography of Oceanic Music and Dance (Wellington, 1977, 2/1995)
W. Chen: Qing shi yue zhi zhi yanjiu [Studies on the music section of the Qing history] (Taipei, 1978)
P. Collaer: Südostasien, Musikgeschichte in Bildern, i/3 (Leipzig, 1979)
E.M. Frame: ‘The Musical Instruments of Sabah, Malaysia’, EthM, xxvi (1982), 247–74
M. Tenzer: Balinese Music (Singapore, 1991)
V. Chenoweth: The Marimbas of Guatemala (Lexington, KY, 1964)
L. O’Brien: ‘Marimbas of Guatemala: the African Connection’, World of Music, xxiv/2 (1982), 99–104
R. Garfias: ‘The Marimba of Mexico and Central America’, LAMR, iv (1983), 203–32
L. Kaptain: Maderas que cantan (Tuxtla Gutiérrez, 1991)
J.B. Camposeco Mateo: Te’ son, chiab’ o k’ojom: la marimba de Guatemala (Guatemala City, 2/1994)
Name given to an instrument of the Xylophone family with a compass sufficiently large to embrace the low-sounding bars of the Marimba and the highest-sounding bars of the xylophone (it is classified as an idiophone: set of percussion plaques). The normal compass of the xylorimba is five octaves: C to c''''. As the marimba-xylophone it was a popular instrument in the 1920s and 30s, particularly in vaudeville. The lower notes of the xylorimba sound more like a xylophone than a marimba on account of the bars being thicker and narrower than those of a modern marimba (the bars of the xylophone and the marimba are shaped differently to emphasize different overtones; see Acoustics, §V, 2).
The terms have been a source of confusion. Many composers have called for ‘xylorimba’, including Berg (Three Orchestral Pieces, op.6, 1914–15), Boulez (e.g. Le marteau sans maître, 1953–5, rev. 1957) and Messiaen, but invariably the parts were written for a four-octave xylophone. Stravinsky’s The Flood (1961–2) includes a part for ‘marimba-xylophone’, but a marimba was intended. The parts in Roberto Gerhard’s Hymnody (1963; with two players at one instrument) were originally labelled ‘xylorimba’, but this was later changed to ‘marimba’. Boulez wrote for two true xylorimbas (each of five octaves) in Pli selon pli (1957–62); the parts have sometimes been played on two xylophones and two marimbas.
JAMES BLADES/JAMES HOLLAND
A 19th-century Xylophone.
(b Corfu, 8 June 1812/14; d Athens, 11 Nov 1896). Greek composer and guitarist. He studied in Corfu with Mantzaros and in Naples with Zingarelli at the Conservatorio di S Pietro a Majella (1834–7). On his return to Corfu he taught singing at the Corfu Philharmonic Society for nearly 20 years. As a virtuoso guitarist he toured extensively in Italy and around the eastern Mediterranean. He settled in Athens in about 1886 and died blind and in dire poverty. In his lifetime he was one of the most popular composers of the Ionian school founded by Mantazros. His most notable work, and the only one of his operas to survive, is O ypopsifios vouleftis (‘The Parliamentary Candidate’), the first Greek opera to a Greek libretto. It is a fresh work revealing the dichotomy between corrupt politicians and destitute peasants on the eve of the union of the Ionian Islands with Greece (1864). Its première in Athens, by the Elliniko Melodrama company on 14 March 1888, is generally considered to represent the birth of Greek lyric theatre. The opera's realistic subject matter, unusual for comic opera, is enhanced by language rich in colourful idiomatic expressions. Some charming and unpretentious orchestral writing, suggesting the folk music of the Ionian Islands, differentiates the work from the Italian buffo archetype.
Most of his works were posthumously destroyed, but several of his songs are extant, and some published. They show a gift for unaffected melodic invention, some with a flavour of Ionian folk music (such as Nani-nani, ‘Lullaby’). Others, extended and in bel canto style, are full-length arias, whose dramatic qualities give an invaluable hint not only to the nature of Xyndas's lost operas, but also to the language of other Ionian composers in the 1850s, for example Edouardos Lambelet.
(selective list)
Anna Winter (4, after A. Dumas père: Les trois mousquetaires), Corfu, S Giacomo, carn. 1855, lost; trans. by S. Callos as I tris somatofylakes [The Three Musketeers], Corfu, S Giacomo, ?1885, lost |
Il conte Giuliano (3, Y. Markoras), Corfu, S Giacomo, carn. 1857, GR-An, Motsenigos archive (without vocal parts) |
O ypopsifios [The Candidate] (1, N. Makris/?Xyndas), 1857, lost |
O odhyrmos tou Kerkyraeou horikou [Woes of a Corfu Peasant] (1, Makris/?Xyndas, 1857, lost |
O ypopsifios vouleftis [The Parliamentary Candidate] (3, I. Rinopoulos, after libs of O ypopsifios and O odhyrmos tou Kerkyraeou), Corfu, S Giacomo, Sept/Oct 1867, lib in Yennadheios Library, Athens, vs (Act 1 only) in GR-Aleotsakos, complete vs in private collections |
Arkadion, Corfu, ?1867, lost |
O neogambros [The Bridegroom] (comic op), 1877, lost |
I due pretendenti, excerpts perf. Milan, 1877, lost |
Galatea (5, after drama by S. Vassiliadis), ?1887–96, inc., lost |
O prikothiras [The Dowry Hunter] (Gk. vaudeville, 1, after comedy by A. Nikolaras), Athens, Omonoia, 9 Aug 1890, collab. D. Rhodhios, aria Z |
To filima (To filaki) [The Kiss], Athens, Tsoha, 22 Sept 1893, lost |
Choral: Hymnos dhia ton en Kriti agona [Hymn for the Cretan Uprising], G, 3vv chorus, pf, c1866–7; San ti spitha krymméni stin stahti [Like a Spark among the Ashes] (A. Koutouvalis), G, 3vv male chorus, pf, before March 1875; Xypnate Ellinopaedha [Arise, ye Sons of Greece], F, 2vv chorus, pf; Ta dhyo adhelfia [The Two Siblings] (D. Solomos), F, 2vv chorus, a cappella |
Solo vocal: 12 asmata ellinika [12 Greek Songs], 1/2/3vv, pf, ?1856 (Athens, c1882); To orfano [The Organ] (A. Paraschos), 1875 (Athens, c1888–9); I athlia psychi kathimeri [The Poor Soul Sat Sighing] (D. Solomos, after W. Shakespeare: Othello, act 4, scene iii), 1v, pf (Corfu, n.d.); Glykeia nychta [Sweet Night] (P.D. Heliopoulos), C, n.d.; Nani-nani [Lullaby] (A. Valaoritis), a, in Asty, no.106 (27 Sept 1887); To fili [The Kiss] (G. Martinellis), C, n.d.); To mnima [The Grave], F, 1v, ?orch, lost; To oneiron [The Dream] (A. Paraschos); O patrikos tafos [Father’s Grave] (Solomos), 1v, pf, str qt; Lemvodhia [Barcarolla], g (Athens, after 1896) |
La Meditazione, B, pf, c1876, MS in private collection, Corfu |
|
Principal publishers: Zacharias Velondhios, J.G. Lupis, Georghios Filippou Nakas |
MGG1 (John G. Papaïoannou)
‘S. Xyntas’, Asty, no.105 (20 Sept 1887)
D.G. Thémelis: ‘I moussiki sylloghi apo tin idhiotiki vivliothiki tov Othona tis Elladhos’ [The music collection in King Otto's private library], Ellinika, xxxi (1979), 453–83
T. Hadjipandazis: To komidhyllio [The (Greek) Vaudeville] (Athens, 1981)
G. Leotsakos: ‘Spyridon, Xyndas’, Pangosmio viografiko lexiko [Universal biographical dictionary], vii (Athens, 1987), 414–15
K. Baroutas: I moussiki zoi stin Athina to 19o aeona [Musical life in Athens during the 19th century] (Athens, 1992)
G. Leotsakos: ‘I haménes ellinikés operes, i o afanismos tou moussikou mas politismou’ [The lost Greek operas, or the destruction of our musical civilization], Epilogos '92 (Athens, 1992), 398–428
GEORGE LEOTSAKOS