The History of Europe And the Church
The Relationship that Shaped the Western World
The historic relationship between Europe and the Church is a relationship that has shaped the history of the Western World.
Europe stands at a momentous crossroads. Events taking shape there will radically change the face of the continent and world. To properly understand today's news and the events that lie ahead, a grasp of the sweep of European history is essential. Only within an historical context can the events of our time be fully appreciated - which is why this narrative series is written in the historic present to give the reader a sense of being on the scene as momentous events unfold on the stage of history. |
1 - The Great War is Over | 9 - Chaos in Germany | |
2 - II Duce | 10 - The Third Reich | |
3 - March on Rome | 11 - Concordat with Vatican | |
4 - Weimar Republic | 12 - New Roman Empire | |
5 - Mein Kampf | 13 - Prelude to War | |
6 - “Divine Caesar” | 14 - Papal Dilemma | |
7 - Secret Negotiations | 15 - Shattered Empires | |
8 - Lateran Treaty |
THE GREAT WAR IS OVER ! FOUR BRUTAL, BLOODY YEARS OF CONFLICT LEAVE EUROPE DEVASTATED.
The armistice is signed
on November 11, 1918. Voices around the world proclaim this was
"the war to end all wars." It is a joyous day for the victors.
But for the vanquished, it is a dark and
painful time.
The victorious Allied nations dictate a peace treaty they will
live to regret.
On June 28, 1919, the Treaty of
Versailles is signed in the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles Palace, near Paris.
Germany is formally given all blame for the war. She is stripped of all her
overseas colonies, demilitarized, and strapped with near impossible reparations
payments.
The harsh terms of surrender imposed on
defeated Germany will prove to be the seeds of a greater, more horrible war to
come.
In Italy, a troubled postwar period has begun.
Despite her membership in the Triple
Alliance, Italy had declared her neutrality on the outbreak of World War I. In
the spring of 1915, Italy joined the Allies and declared war on Germany and
Austria. Victory in 1918 fueled Italian hopes for territorial rewards.
But Italy's expectations are bitterly
disappointed. Though a victor, the country gains little from the Treaty of
Versailles. Italians complain that they have been robbed of their share of the
spoils. A sense of injury and frustration grips the country.
Among the discontented is Benito
Mussolini. Son of a poor blacksmith, Mussolini was born in 1883 in the north
Italian town of Predappio. An aggressive and ambitious child, he once declared
to his startled mother, "One day I shall make the whole earth tremble!" Formerly
a journalist and schoolmaster, Mussolini fought as a corporal in World War I. He
was seriously wounded in February 1917.
After the war, Mussolini launches a
movement that becomes, in 1921, the Fascist party. Mussolini
is il Duce "the leader" of the ultra-nationalist, anti-Communist
organization. His followers are mostly jobless, disgruntled war veterans. They adopt the black shirt as their uniform.
The Fascists derive their name from the fasces of
Imperial Rome, an ax wrapped in a bundle of elm or birch
rods symbolizing unity and power. The Fascist party adopts the ancient insignia
as its emblem.
Italy is plagued by increasing disorder.
Unemployment, strikes, riots and general unrest tear at the fabric of society.
The government is unable to establish order. Italians look for a way out.
Mussolini — now a member of the Italian
parliament — seizes the opportunity. A gifted orator, he catches the imagination
of the crowds. Posing as a defender of law and order, he capitalizes on the
fears of middle-class Italians. Late in October 1922, the black-shirted Fascist
militia makes its dramatic march on the city of Rome. King Victor Emmanuel III.
permits them to enter the city on 1 October 28. The government is brought down.
On October 29 the king calls on Mussolini
to form a new government. Il Duce makes his entry into Rome on the 30th.
The next day he becomes the youngest prime minister in Italian history at age 39.
Mussolini's play for power has succeeded. Tired of strikes and riots, the
Italian people give him complete support. Mussolini is handed full emergency
powers. Fascism has come to power in Italy. By degrees, Mussolini tightens his
grip on the country and transforms his new government into a dictatorship.
Meanwhile, in defeated Germany, a
democratic government has replaced the old Empire. It is referred to as the
Weimar Republic, because the assembly that adopted its constitution in 1919 had
met at the city of Weimar.
Many Germans cannot accept their
country's defeat. The war leaves them humiliated and disoriented. The
Weimar Republic is plagued from the start by a host of political, economic and
social problems. Germans quickly discover that it is easier to write a
democratic constitution than to make it work.
The constitution ensures the
representation of small minority parties in parliament. Innumerable separate
parties are formed. As a result, government majorities can be formed only by
coalition — temporary alliances of parties. The fragile governments thus formed
are victims of continual disunity and bickering among "partners."
Small parties often hold the balance of power, stalling and blocking legislation.
In 1921, the son of an obscure Austrian
customs official becomes president of one of Germany's many small parties — the
National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP). He is a frustrated artist
named Adolf Hitler.
As a corporal, Hitler was awarded the
coveted Iron Cross for personal bravery in World War I. Now he gathers a small
following of fellow veterans bent on overturning the humiliating Treaty of
Versailles and restoring Germany's honor. He is strongly influenced by the
career and philosophy of Benito Mussolini.
Hitler is impatient. He plots to seize
power in a coup. In November 1923, he stages the Beer Hall Putsch at Munich, an
attempt that fails to overthrow the Bavarian government. He is arrested and
imprisoned for nine months at Landsberg, where he authors an ignored volume
titled Mein Kampf ("My Struggle").
It will later become the bible of the Nazi movement.
Back in Italy, Mussolini is endeavoring
to make Rome again the center of Western civilization.
Il Duce admires Julius Caesar above all
men. He perceives himself a modern-day Caesar, a builder of empires, a figure of
destiny. He shaves his head to make himself look more like a Caesar.
Mussolini has an intense sense of
historical mission. He is fascinated by the history of Rome. He dreams of a
modern Roman Empire, of repeating the great days of ancient Rome.
The handshake is abolished and the old
Roman salute with raised arm becomes the official greeting. Mussolini's
theatrical, gladiatorial pose becomes known world-wide. The strutting Duce is
overwhelmed by his dreams of Roman grandeur.
After Mussolini survives an assassination
attempt, the secretary of the Fascist party announces to cheering crowds:
"God has put his finger on the Duce! He is Italy's greatest son, the rightful heir of Caesar!"
Following the example of ancient Rome, some of Mussolini's Fascist supporters even call him "divine Caesar." Ancient images fill Mussolini's mind — and urge him relentlessly on toward his "destiny."
Italians are overwhelmingly Catholic.
Mussolini realizes that some effort must be made toward settling the long-standing "Roman Question."
Since 1870, the Popes have been in
self-imposed exile in protest against the usurpation of Papal territory by the
forces of King Victor Emmanuel II. The impasse between Italy and the Vatican
persists.
Il Duce knows enough history to realize
he could not emerge unscathed from a head-on confrontation with the Papacy. He
sees advantages to be gained in an alliance with the Church.
Mussolini wants to be able to say that
his is the first Italian government in modern history to be officially
recognized by the Pope.
Accordingly, II Duce seeks to create the
impression that he is a devout Catholic, though since boyhood he has not been a
churchgoer. Privately he scorns the rites and dogmas of the Church. An avowed
atheist in his youth, he had once written a pamphlet titled God Does Not Exist !
For its part, the Vatican is at first
sympathetic toward fascism. Though Pope Pius XI. (1922-1939) is critical of
fascism's use of violence, he considers Mussolini as preferable to all alternatives.
Secret negotiations now prepare the way for a dramatic reconciliation.
Italy's reconciliation with the Vatican
comes on February 11, 1929. Mussolini represents the king. Cardinal Gasparri
represents Pope Pius. In a solemn ceremony at noon in the Lateran Palace in
Rome, three historic documents are signed: The Lateran Treaty gives the Pope
full sovereignty and temporal power over the 110-acre Vatican City, now the
newest and smallest sovereign country in the world. Diplomatic relations between
the newly created state and the kingdom of Italy are established.
A separate financial agreement
compensates the Vatican for its surrender of claims to the old Papal States;
for a sum of about 19,000,000. The fact that the inhabitants of those States had
voted by an enormous majority for liberation from the Pope's rule mattered little.
A concordat defines the position of the
Church in the Fascist state. It establishes Catholicism as the official religion
of Italy. Many hail the reconciliation as one of the most significant events in the modern history of the Church.
Even Mussolini considers it one of the
greatest diplomatic triumphs of his career. He derives immense personal prestige worldwide.
But the agreements by no means end the friction between the Church and the Italian government. In 1931, Pius XI. will
express his strong disapproval of Fascist methods in his encyclical Non abbiamo bisogno.
Meanwhile, the situation is deteriorating
rapidly in the world economic arena.
With the collapse of the New York stock
market late in October 1929, the world enters a new period of economic and
political turmoil. Germany is hit particularly hard . This is just what Hitler
needs. The time for his final drive for power has arrived.
Increasingly hard times fuel the fires of
political pandemonium. Economic disasters trigger widespread social chaos. By
the end of 1931, more than six million Germans are unemployed; by 1933, more
than eight million.
Germany is heading toward national
bankruptcy. Tensions move toward the breaking point. The on-going disunity of
the political parties makes a drastic solution of the crisis inevitable. Germans
seek a strong deliverer.
A born political orator, Hitler uses the
economic crisis as a stepping-stone to more power. He gives Germans new hope.
He promises them stability, power, Lebensraum.
The confused multitude of German parties are unable to unite against him.
The National Socialist (Nazi) movement
gains supporters. In the 1932 elections, Nazis nearly double their popular vote,
winning 230 seats in the Reichstag (37 percent of the total number).
They are the largest party in parliament.
Hitler has proved himself unequaled in
his ability to exploit events to his own ends.
On January 30, 1933, Hitler is asked to
form a government. After years of careful planning, he has at last become
Chancellor.
The Weimar Republic is finished. A modern-day interregum —
a "time without an emperor" — it had lasted but 14 years.
The Third Reich has begun.
Hitler's emergence as Chancellor is
hailed enthusiastically by the Italian press. Mussolini naively views Hitler as
his Fascist protégé, someone he can control and utilize for his own purposes.
Hitler asks the Reichstag to pass an
enabling bill, giving his government full dictatorial powers for four years.
The parliament passes the sweeping legislation, and the Nazis assume complete
control of Germany. In 1934, the offices of Chancellor and President are merged.
Hitler assumes the title of Fuehrer und Reichskanzler.
In short order, the German dictator reinvigorates a demoralized country. He strengthens the
shattered economy, reduces unemployment and raises the standard of living.
But Hitler's aims far transcend his own
country's borders. He is convinced he has a great mission to perform. He feels
destined to become ruler of a great Germanic Empire. He holds an unshakable
conviction that the Reich will one day rule all of Europe — and from there seize
the leadership of the world! A new order will emerge in the world, with the German "master race" at its head!
Hitler compares himself with Charlemagne,
Frederick the Great and Napoleon. From his mountain fortress in Obersalzberg,
overlooking Berchtesgaden, the Fuehrer has a panoramic view of the Untersberg.
It is in this mountain, as legend has it, that Charlemagne still sleeps, and
will one day arise to restore the past glory of the German Empire.
"You see the Untersberg over there," Hitler tells visitors in a mystical tone. "It is no accident that I have my residence opposite it."
Like Mussolini, Hitler — a Catholic by
birth — sees a need to come to terms with the Vatican.
On July 20, 1933, the Vatican signs a
concordat with the Nazi regime, protecting the rights of the Church under the
Third Reich. Pope Pius XI. hopes that Hitler will discourage the extreme
anti-Christian radicalism of National Socialism. For Hitler, the concordat gives
his new government an outward semblance of legitimacy.
But relations between Berlin and the
Vatican are strained. Pope Pius has no illusions about Naziism. He authors
several protests against Nazi practices. On March 14, 1937, Pius issues his
encyclical Mitbrennender Sorge
("With Burning Anxiety") against Naziism. It charges that the German state has
violated the 1933 concordat, and vigorously denounces the Nazi conception of life as utterly anti-Christian.
About the same time, Pius — an outspoken
adversary of communism — issues another encyclical,
Divine Redemptoris, denouncing the
Bolshevik campaign against religion. It pronounces the political philosophy
and the atheistic ideology behind Marxist doctrine as contrary to the Divine
Will and intrinsically evil.
In Italy, Mussolini has been vigorously
pursuing his vainglorious dream of a modern Roman Empire.
In 1896, Italy had suffered a humiliating
defeat in Ethiopia (Abyssinia) at the hands of King Menelik II. Italian forces
were crushed by an Ethiopian army at the Battle of Adowa. Ten thousand Italians
lay dead. The defeat was disastrous to Italian expansion in Africa.
The humiliation has not been forgotten.
The memory of Adowa still lives. The score must be settled.
Mussolini, the modern Caesar, casts eyes
toward Ethiopia. He sees its conquest as a means of restoring Roman grandeur.
On October 3, 1935, the Italian dictator
launches his first foreign military adventure. He invades the kingdom of
Ethiopia as the League of Nations weakly stands by.
After months of fighting, Adowa is avenged. Il Duce's African venture is a success
— a "Roman triumph." The armies of Emperor Haile Selassie are defeated.
On May 9, 1936, Italy formally annexes
Ethiopia. King Victor Emmanuel is proclaimed Emperor of Ethiopia. A month later,
a decree incorporates Ethiopia with the existing Italian colonies of Eritrea and
Italian Somaliland into a single great colony, Italian East Africa.
Mussolini now proclaims another
resurrection of the Roman Empire. "At last Italy has her empire," Il Duce
declares to an enormous crowd from the balcony of the Palazzo Venezia.
"Legionnaires!" he continues. "In this supreme certitude raise high your insignia, your weapons, and your hearts to salute, after fifteen centuries, the reappearance of the empire on the fated hills of Rome."
Though a great success at home, Mussolini's Ethiopian adventure isolates Italy from the Western democracies. As a result, Mussolini turns to Hitler as an ally. In October 1936, the "Berlin-Rome Axis" is formed. Hitler and Il Duce forge an agreement to coordinate their foreign policies. As in the days of Otto the Great, Germany ties its destiny to Italy !
While the fight is going on in Ethiopia,
events are happening in quick succession in Germany.
In a daring move, Hitler orders German
troops to march into the demilitarized zone of the Rhineland, established by the
Treaty of Versailles. It is March 7, 1936. The French fail to call Hitler's bluff.
A year earlier, Hitler had unilaterally
abrogated the disarmament clauses of the Versailles treaty and had begun to
rearm openly.
In March 1938, Germany occupies Austria,
which is quickly incorporated into the Greater German Reich. In September,
Hitler demands and receives the cession of the Sudetenland area of
Czechoslovakia ("my last territorial claim in Europe," he says).
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of
Britain yields to Hitler's demands, hoping against hope that concessions to the
dictator will promote "peace in our time."
On May 22, 1939, ties between Hitler and
Mussolini become even closer as the two form a 10-year political and military
alliance — the Pact of Steel. The Italian press proclaims,
"The two strongest powers of Europe have now bound themselves to each other for peace and war."
In August 1939, Germany and Soviet Russia
sign a nonaggression pact, guaranteeing Soviet nonintervention in Hitler's ventures in the
West. Hitler's eastern flank is now secure. The stage is set. A catastrophe is about to engulf the world !
In a final last-minute appeal to head off
the outbreak of world conflict, the new Pope, Pius XII., declares on August 24,
"Everything can be lost by war; nothing is lost by peace."
But Hitler's plan is set. Casting aside all pretenses of
peaceful aspirations, the German dictator accuses and attacks Poland on September 1.
The peace of Europe is broken. World War II has begun — a struggle for the mastery of the world !
Pope Pius XI. died in March 1939. His
successor as war breaks out in Europe is Eugenio Pacelli, now Pius XII. Few
Popes will be the subject of as much controversy as he.
In 1917, Pacelli had been sent as Papal
nuncio (ambassador) to Munich to negotiate a concordat with the Bavarian Court.
This accomplished, he was sent to Berlin in 1925 with the same aim. After
concluding the concordat with the Weimar Republic, Pacelli was recalled to Rome
in 1929 and created a cardinal and Vatican secretary of state.
As Cardinal Pacelli, he drew up and signed the concordat with
Hitler's Nazi Germany on behalf of Pius XI. in the summer of 1933.
Pacelli's years in Germany gave him a
fluency in the German language and a great love for the German people. In view
of this, his proclaimed neutrality as wartime Pontiff will be questioned. After
the war he will be accused of failing to denounce Hitler and neglecting to speak
out publicly against Hitler's "final solution" to the "Jewish problem." Some
critics will declare that by remaining silent he became an accomplice to genocide.
Pledged to neutrality, Pius believes the
Holy See can play a peacemaking role if it maintains formal relations with all
the belligerents. Yet he is keenly concerned about the Jews.
Pius faces a terrible choice . He knows
the capabilities of Naziism, having been closely associated with the anti-Nazi
encyclical Mit brennender Sorge.
In September 1943, Germans occupy Rome.
The dilemma of Pius XII. becomes even more acute. Nazi troops are now camped on
his very doorstep. Public condemnation of Hitler could lead to reprisals, even
invite a Nazi invasion of the Vatican. That would jeopardize the Holy See's
diplomatjc efforts on behalf of the Jews and end any influence the Papacy might have in favor of peace.
Pius issues repeated private protests
against Nazi atrocities and is even involved in efforts to shelter Jews and
political refugees. But he stops short of outright public denunciation. Faced
with circumstances in which his public statements might further rouse Hitler
against the Jews and expose German Catholics to charges of treason, he takes the side of caution.
In retrospect, sympathetic observers will
assert that, under the circumstances, Pius did all he could against a powerful
totalitarian government. Public denunciation would not have stopped the Nazi leadership anyway.
At the outset of war, Germany seems
invincible. Hitler subjects a whole continent, directly or indirectly, to his
power. Not since the days when the Roman Empire was at its height has one man
ruled such vast expanses in Europe.
But Hitler's is an ephemeral empire. In
1941, the German dictator makes Napoleon's disastrous mistake of invading
Russia. Operation Barbarossa is a fatal blunder. The tide of war begins to turn.
In the end, the Fuehrer and the Duce die
within days of each other, their dreams of conquest and empire shattered.
Mussolini is executed by Italian
partisans on April 28, 1945. His megalomaniac attempt to restore the Roman
Empire ends in ruin. Hitler, it is declared, has now committed suicide in his
Berlin bunker on April 30, as his "Thousand-year Reich" crashes around him.
The war in Europe is over.
Italy is devastated. Germany lies in
ruins. Some observers declare Germany will never rise again.
Others say it will take at least 50, maybe even 100 years or
more. Privately, some Germans are thinking that no defeat is final.
As the victors and vanquished alike pick
up the pieces of their shattered and now-divided continent, a centuries-old
concept again takes its rise in the minds of Europeans — the ideal of a United
States of Europe. Europe slowly sets out on the path toward its final — and most
crucial — revival.
1 - The War in Europe is Over | 7 - Common Cause | |
2 - Age-Old Ideal | 8 - Recurrent Theme | |
3 - First Steps Toward Unity | 9 - Europe and the Cross | |
4 - Pattern of History | 10 - Final Revival | |
5 - Mutual Need | 11 - Two Legs | |
6 - Elusive Unity | 12 - United Europe Inevitable |
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
It is the spring of 1945. The fighting in Europe is over.
Never has war been more destructive. The human and material losses are
incalculable. The staggering enormity of the tragedy gradually becomes clear.
The appalling cost in human lives totals more than 40 million civilian and
military deaths.
Europe lies in ruins. Germany in particular has been hard hit. Many
wonder whether war-torn Germany will ever rise again. Europe has hit bottom. It
has been the pattern of European history: catastrophe, followed by revival, followed by catastrophe.
The war-ravaged Continent slowly begins to pick up the pieces. The
suffering and destruction of World War II prompt many to ask how such a
catastrophe might be avoided in the future. Many wonder: Is Europe doomed to oscillate between
order and chaos, between power and ignominy? Or might a new path toward peace and stability be found ?
In a celebrated speech at Zurich, Switzerland, in September 1946, Winston Churchill suggests a possible solution:
"We must build a kind of United States of Europe."
Once again, an age-old ideal resurfaces.
The devastation of two world wars has made the limitations of national
sovereignty painfully evident. If Europe's individual nationalisms could be
submerged within the context of European supra nationalism, many feel that
future continental conflagrations could be averted. If Europe could become one
family of nations, historic enmities could be put to rest.
The plan has highly significant overtones. For centuries, statesmen
have advocated the union of European nations. Now, a fresh movement toward unity
arises from the devastation of World War II.
But how to begin ?
It is Churchill, among others, who again suggests a course:
"The first step in the re-creation of the European family must be a partnership between France and Germany."
The reconciliation of these two age-old enemies is widely viewed as the
essential cornerstone of peace in postwar Europe. In essence — the re-creation of
the Empire of Charlemagne !
How, specifically, might this be achieved ?
A scheme is devised to unite France and Germany within a common venture
designed to bind their economic destinies so tightly together that another
intra-European war could not occur. The result is the European Coal and Steel
Community (ECSC), created by the Treaty of Paris in April 1951.
The ECSC is a first step toward European integration. It creates a
common transnational authority to pool French and German iron, coal and steel
resources. The project is extended to include Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands
and Luxembourg.
The wheels of European industry have begun to turn again. Massive U.S.
aid in the form of the Marshall Plan has helped spur European recovery. And the
ECSC has shown Europeans the advantages of cooperation.
Now, a further step is taken on the road toward integration.
Individually, the nations of Western Europe — fragmented by internal barriers — are
merely secondary influences in world affairs. But united, many come to realize,
their joint economic strength could allow them to recover some of their lost
influence and give them a major voice in the global arena.
The signing of the Treaty of Rome on March 25, 1957, creates the
European Economic Community (EEC), or Common Market. Its six charter members are
the same countries associated in the ECSC. (By 1986, the number of members will
have grown to 12.)
The EEC's initial goal is to remove trade and economic barriers between
its members and unify their economic policies. But the ultimate hope is that the
organization will be able to bring about the eventual political unification of
Europe. Many hail the EEC as the nucleus of a future "United States of Europe."
In short order the EEC becomes the world's most powerful trading bloc.
And West Germany — at the center of the European continent — becomes the most
powerful nation of Europe west of the Soviet Union.
Again, Europe has set out on the road to unity. Past articles in this
series have shown that the Roman dream of a united Europe has permeated the
history of the Continent.
Justinian dreamed of restoring the Roman Empire. He accomplished it in
A.D. 554, healing the "deadly wound" administered to Rome by barbarian
invaders in 476. But his restoration was short-lived.
In A.D. 800, Charlemagne was crowned as imperator Romanorum,
again restoring the Roman Empire in the West.
In Charlemagne, Western Europe had a Christian Caesar, a Roman emperor born of
Germanic race. His realm was the spiritual heir of the old Western Roman Empire.
Charlemagne was rex pater Europae — "King
Father of Europe." He showed Europeans the ideal of a unified Christian Empire.
Throughout the Middle Ages, the memory of the once-great Roman Empire lived as a
vital tradition in the hearts of Europeans.
In 962, Otto the Great revived Charlemagne's Empire as the first fully
German Reich. The Sacrum Romanum Imperium
Nationis Germanicae — Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation — made its
debut. Otto's octagonal crown became the very symbol of the concept of European
unity. Germany became the power center of the Empire.
In the 16th century, the great Habsburg Emperor Charles V. pursued
tirelessly, though unsuccessfully, the medieval ideal of a unified Empire
embracing the entire Christian world. Napoleon, too, dreamed of a resurrected
Roman-European civilization, dominated by France. He considered himself the heir
and successor to Caesar and Charlemagne.
Mussolini likewise envisioned a modern Roman Empire. In 1936 he
proclaimed another resurrection of the Roman Empire, claiming succession to
imperial Rome.
Along with the time-honored system of Roman-inspired government,
another pattern has stood out in the panorama of European history: the intimate
relationship of the spiritual with the secular power.
Throughout the Middle Ages, leaders considered the Church at Rome to be
God's chosen instrument in spiritual matters. The Holy Roman Empire was
regarded as God's chosen political organization over Western Christendom. Pope
and Emperor were regarded as God's vice-regents on earth. This intimate alliance
of Church and State served the needs of both institutions. The Empire exercised
its political and military powers to defend religion and enforce internal
submission through religious uniformity. The Church, in turn, acted as a glue
for Europe, holding together the differing nationalities by the tie of common
religion.
This ideal in Church-State relations was never completely realized, as
we have seen in the frequent conflicts between Emperors and Popes for the
leadership of Christian Europe. Yet despite their rivalry, the Papacy and Empire
remained closely associated, their need for each other overriding disagreements
of lesser importance.
Justinian became inheritor of the Roman Empire as Christianized by
Constantine. He acknowledged the supremacy of the Pope in the West. Charlemagne
received the imperial crown at the hands of Pope Leo III., initiating a close
alliance between Pope and Empire. Otto the Great was crowned Holy Roman Emperor
by Pope John XII., reviving Charlemagne's Empire in an alliance between Emperor
and Church. Pope Clement VII. crowned Charles V. as Holy Roman Emperor. Charles
fought hard to maintain the spiritual unity of Europe.
Napoleon's coronation was consecrated by Pope Pius VII. Mussolini, too,
recognized the need to come to terms with the Vatican, as did Adolf Hitler a
few years later. All these successors of the Roman Caesars understood the vast
importance of the Papacy in European affairs. But what of the present and
future role of the Vatican in Europe in these latter days of the 20th century and beyond ?
Over the past few decades the authority and unity of the Roman Catholic
Church have been severely shaken. The festering issues of birth control,
abortion, divorce, celibacy, homosexuality, women in the priesthood, political
activism of priests, child sexual abuse and distribution of ecclesiastical power have greatly
troubled the Church. Many even in the upper echelons of the Vatican hierarchy
have expressed apprehension over the Church's future.
At the same time, the continent of Europe itself stands at an historic
crossroads. Divided ideologically between East and West and beset with serious
economic and military concerns, Europe faces crucial decisions on its future.
Like the Catholic Church, Europe has been weakened by division. And both
prelates and politicians alike realize that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
In the face of this division, voices within both European political
circles and the Catholic Church are appealing for UNITY. But how, many ask, is that elusive unity
to be achieved? How are the rifts to be healed — both within the Church and within Europe itself ?
The record of the recent past does not augur well for the future. On a
purely political basis, the nations of Europe have been unable to unite. Strides
have been made, but the slow process of gradually increasing the powers of the
EEC's political institutions has not worked as hoped. The process has resulted
in only minimal surrender of national political sovereignty. The institutions
are invested with no substantial powers. And Eastern Europe is still cut off.
(Notice, when this was originally written it was true,
but today, radical changes have erased those last 2 obstacles mentioned)
Likewise, the Catholic Church within remains philosophically divided
between liberal and conservative, despite the best efforts of unity-minded
churchmen. Confronted with these realities, leading European politicians and
Catholic clergymen have come to an important realization. There is only one
possible course for the future, they believe.
If they are to solve their respective problems, Europe and the Catholic
Church need each other's help. Their common need for unity can be achieved
only by working together. Once again, the past points the way to the future.
Influential churchmen inside the Vatican have come to believe that the
only way to inspire unity and bring new life to the Church is to
plunge it into a cause larger than itself. That cause, many believe, is the unification of Europe !
In turn, many of Europe's political leaders see a role for the Church in
their efforts. They believe the Church might once again exercise its powerful
cohesive effect on Europe, providing the glue — the tie of common religion — to hold
Europe together politically.
Again, as in centuries past, Europeans are beginning to appreciate that
religion and politics are interdependent. In essence, they are envisioning a
reconstitution of the whole of classic Europe, along the lines of the old Holy
Roman Empire, under Catholic aegis. The dream of the Holy Roman Empire yet lives !
The time-honored theme of European unity on the basis of a common
religious heritage has been raised frequently by Pope John Paul II. For him it
is no casual, passing concern. He has made it very clear that he believes he has
a literal calling from God to unite Europe !
During his well-publicized trip to his native Poland in June 1979, the Pope declared:
"Europe, despite its present and long-lasting division of regimes, ideologies and economic systems, cannot cease to seek its fundamental unity and must turn to Christianity. . . . Economic and political reasons cannot do it. We must go deeper...."
In Santiago, Spain, in 1982 he proclaimed the following, in what he called a "Declaration to Europe":
"I, Bishop of Rome and Shepherd of the Universal Church, from Santiago, utter to you, Europe of the ages, a cry full of love: Find yourself again. Be yourself. Discover your origins, revive your roots."
The Pope has repeatedly stressed that Europe must seek religious unity if it is to advance beyond its present divisions. At his final mass during his trip to Poland in June 1983, John Paul prayed for
"all the Christians of East and West, that they become united in Christ and expand the Kingdom of Christ throughout the world."
The following September, 1982, in the first Papal pilgrimage to Vienna, Austria, in two centuries, the Pope again urged Europeans on both sides of the Iron Curtain to unite on the basis of their common Christian heritage. To a crowd of 100,000, he emphasized Europe's unity in
"the deep Christian roots and the human and cultural values which are sacred to all Europe."
The theme of European unity on the basis of common religious heritage
is not unique to John Paul II. Since World War II, each Pope has thrown his
weight behind moves for the creation of a supranational European community.
Pope John XXIII. said that Catholics should be "in the front ranks" of
the unification effort. Pope Paul VI. was especially vocal in his support for
European unity. In November 1963, he declared:
"Everyone knows the tragic history of our century. If there is a means of preventing this from happening again, it is the construction of a peaceful, organic, united Europe.
In 1965, Paul VI. observed that
"a long, arduous path lies ahead. However, the Holy See hopes to see the day born when a new Europe will arise, rich with the fullness of its traditions."
Perhaps the most forceful of Paul VI.'s calls for European unification came on October 18, 1975. It was an address in Rome to participants in the Third Symposium of the Bishops of Europe. Present were more than 100 bishops, cardinals and prelates representing 24 European countries. The Pope declared:
"Can it not be said that it is faith, the Christian faith, the Catholic faith that made Europe ...?
Paul VI continued: "And it is there that our mission as bishops in Europe takes on a gripping perspective.
No other human force in Europe can render the service that is confided to us, promoters of the faith, to reawaken Europe's Christian soul, where its unity is rooted."
Paul VI. called the Catholic faith "the secret of Europe's identity." In discovering this secret, he said, Europe could then go on to perform "the providential service to which God is still calling it."
The Popes' calls for the spiritual unity of Europe have been echoed by
influential spokesmen in the political arena.
Prominent among these is Dr. Otto von Habsburg, a key figure in the
movement for European unification. Dr. Habsburg is the eldest son of the last
Austro-Hungarian Emperor and a member of the European Parliament. Inter-European
unity has long been a quest of the Habsburgs, as we have seen. Dr. Habsburg often speaks of
the similarities between the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages and his view
of a coming "United States of Europe."
Dr. Habsburg has long advocated a strong religious role in
any future united Europe. He regards the Roman Catholic Church as Europe's ultimate bulwark.
"The cross doesn't need Europe," he once stated, "but Europe needs the cross."
Europeans, he believes, must be reawakened to their historical religious heritage.
"If we take Christianity out of the European development, there is nothing left," he declares. "The soul is gone."
Dr. Habsburg has also
called attention to the potential role of the crown of the Holy Roman Empire,
which today resides in the Schatzkammer (Royal Treasury) in Vienna.
Christopher Hollis, in the foreword to Dr. Habsburg's book The Social Order of Tomorrow,
points out that Dr. Habsburg
"would like to see Europe resume her essential unity, and in the symbolism of that unity he thinks that the imperial crown of Charlemagne and of the Holy Roman Empire might well have its part to play."
It is to the model of the Holy Roman Empire that many European political figures and leading churchmen are now looking for the answer to today's political and religious woes. A revived alliance between church and "empire," they believe, may be the very key — the only key — to European survival in the face of perilous world conditions !
Forces already have been set in motion that will revolutionize the face
of Europe and the role of the Roman Catholic Church. As often explained in the
pages of The Plain Truth, Bible prophecy reveals that
current efforts toward Church unity and European political integration will be achieved !
The result will be the emergence of a religious-political union in Europe, in the spirit of the old
Holy Roman Empire — a final revival, in this age of the Bomb, of the ancient Roman political system !
As we have seen in this series of articles, numerous revivals of the
Roman Empire have arisen in Europe in the centuries since the fall of ancient
Rome. In Revelation 17, these revivals are represented by the seven heads of a
wild animal. Six have already occurred, from Justinian to Mussolini. One last
restoration of this great political system is yet to arise.
This confederated Europe will be an immense political, military and
economic power — a great Third Force in world affairs, a superpower in its own
right. Prophecy further reveals that this powerful church-state union will be
composed of "ten horns" — meaning 10 nations or groups of nations (Rev.
l7:3) — under the overall leadership of a single political figure (verse 13).
Europe will again have a single political head of state! Moreover, prophecy
foretells that a religious figure of unprecedented power and authority will sit
astride the "empire," directing it as a rider guides a horse (Rev. 17:3).
To counter the ongoing spread of atheism, secularism and consumerism,
the Vatican — as in centuries past — will be forced to become a major power in the
international arena. The political muscle of the Papacy will be reinvigorated.
The "spiritual unity" of the Continent — as so often urged by recent Popes — will be realized !
(Notice, since this was originally written in the 1980's the Berlin wall came down
and the European-Union now includes 27 countries and has its own constitution — and many efforts are
being made to officially recognize the pope's religion as the state religion of the European Union)
Now notice further: In the second chapter of the Old Testament book of
Daniel, he interprets the kings dream where the Roman Empire and its predecessors are pictured as a giant human
figure representing five kingdoms. The figure's 10 toes correspond to the fifth kingdom and to the 10 end-time
national units also described (as "horns") in Revelation 17. The prophecy of Daniel reveals that
these 10 entities will constitute a political system that will exist at the
return of Jesus Christ to establish the kingdom of God on this earth (Dan. 2:44, 45).
(Notice, only five world kingdoms, the last of which is taking shape now in Europe)
The original Roman Empire was broken into two "legs," as pictured in
the human image of the kings dream and Daniel's prophecy — the Eastern Empire centered at Byzantium
(Constantinople) and the Empire of the West centered at Rome. Thus it is very
possible that the coming reconstituted Roman Empire will be composed of two
distinct yet cooperative parts: one comprising nations of Western Europe, the
other incorporating nations freed from Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe.
Given the fact of five toes on each foot of the human image, possibly five
entities will come from the West and five from the East.
With this in mind, Pope John Paul II.'s appeals to Christians behind the
Iron Curtain take on added significance. His voice is a source of enormous
influence in that region. Many East Europeans have caught his vision of a
pan-European Christian alliance against the secular materialism of our modern age.
"The Pope," observes one news commentator, "has undertaken the liberation
of Eastern Europe." Vatican observers speculate that the voice of the Papacy
might continue to stir religious and nationalistic fervor in Eastern Europe,
which, together with other factors, could weaken the Kremlin's hold sufficiently
to open the way for a political deal between Europe and the Kremlin — a deal that
would allow elements of Eastern Europe to associate themselves with an evolving
West European union. (Notice, since this was originally written the Pope has indeed succeeded)
In this age of intercontinental missiles, the nations of Eastern Europe
no longer adequately fulfill their original function as a security buffer for
the Soviet Union. And they are a severe drain on Soviet economic and military
resources. Many political observers are therefore suggesting that the Kremlin
might soon be willing to strike a deal: the withdrawal of its military forces
from Eastern Europe in exchange for the neutralization of Eastern Europe and the
withdrawal of American forces from Western Europe !
The resulting political vacuum in Europe could then be filled by a new
entity, the prophesied resurrected Holy Roman Empire !
What is transpiring on both sides of the Iron Curtain today are the first steps in the refashioning of Europe into a new, yet old, alignment. As George Bailey, in his perceptive book Germans, suggests:
"Can we be sure that history has written finis to what was perhaps the grandest design ever conceived by man: the Holy Roman Empire?"
Declares Otto von Habsburg:
"We are well beyond the point of no return where you can still go back into the [recentj past. Of course, we have not yet arrived at the other shore; but we can't go back."
A united Europe is inevitable.
Unity is not a condition which nations achieve by some natural and
inevitable tendency. Unity is created or imposed by vigorous human action, by
effort and will. Europe awaits a modern Charlemagne, another Otto the Great, a
second Charles V. — a champion to resurrect the tradition of imperial unity.
The coming Renovatio imperii Romanorum — restoration
of the Empire of the Romans — will astound the world !
Europe — and the Church of Rome — will again be powers to reckon with.
Notice, since this was originally written there is no more Iron Curtain (Berlin wall)
A young mid-twenties, German born and raised, musician by the name of Gernot had come to my city to study music at the university for a few months in the early eighties.
We became neighbors and friends, we talked about the eventual destruction of the dreaded wall that separated
his country and of the coming monetary unit that was to become the Euro. Both of these had yet to materialize
and my German friend had emphatically refused to believe that the Iron Curtain would fall within his lifetime.
He was born there and yet could not see the day when his own country could ever be reunited.
About 2 years after returning to his homeland he was there to witness what he thought he would never see.
Table of Contents . . . |
Forward to Next Chapter . . . |
Back to Previous Chapter . . . |
Background: Blue Green Brown Yellow Purple Pink None