Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
DEUTERONOMY , the name of one of the books of the Old Testament. This See also:book was See also:long the See also:storm-centre of Pentateuchal See also:criticism, orthodox scholars boldly asserting that any who questioned its See also:Mosaic authorship reduced it to the level of a pious See also:fraud. But Biblical facts have at last triumphed over tradition, and the non-Mosaic authorship of Deuteronomy is nowa See also:commonplace of criticism. It is still instructive, however, to See also:note the successive phases through which scholarly See also:opinion regarding the See also:composition and :date of his book has passed.
In the 17th See also:century the characteristics which so clearly See also:mark off Deuteronomy from the other four books of the See also:Pentateuch were frankly recognized, but the most advanced critics of that See also:age were inclined to pronounce it the earliest and most See also:authentic of the five. In the beginning of the 19th century de Wette startled the religious See also:world by declaring that Deuteronomy, so far from being Mosaic,' was not known till the See also:time of See also:Josiah. This theory he founded on 2 See also:Kings xxii.; and ever since, this See also:chapter has been one of the recognized' foci of Biblical criticism. The only other single chapter of the See also:Bible which is responsible for having brought about a somewhat similar revolution in See also:critical opinion is Ezek. xliv. From this chapter, some seventy years after de Wette's See also:discovery, See also:Wellhausen with equal acumen inferred that See also:Leviticus was not known to See also:Ezekiel, the See also:priest, and therefore could not have been in existence in his See also:day; for had Leviticus been the recognized See also:Law-book of his nation Ezekiel could not have represented as a degradation the very position which that Law-book described as a See also:special See also:honour conferred on the See also:Levites by Yahweh himself. Hence Leviticus, so far from belonging to an earlier stratum of the Pentateuch than Deuteronomy, as de Wette thought, must belong to a much later stratum, and be at least exilic, if not See also:post-exilic.
The See also:title " Deuteronomy " is due to a mistranslation by the See also:Septuagint of the clause in See also:chap. xvii. 18, rendered " and he shall write out for himself this Deuteronomy." The See also:Hebrew really means " and he [the See also: Moreover the phrase " this law " is so ambiguous as to raise a much greater difficulty than that caused by the See also:Greek mistranslation of the Hebrew word for " copy." How much does " this law "include? It was long supposed to mean the whole of our See also:present Deuteronomy; indeed, it is on that supposition that the traditional view of the Mosaic authorship is based. But the context alone can determine the question; and that is often so ambiguous that a sure inference is impossible. We may safely assert, however, that nowhere need " this law " mean the whole book. In fact, it invariably means very much less, and sometimes, as in See also:xxvii. 3, 8, so little that it could all be engraved in large letters on a few plastered stones set up beside an See also:altar. Deuteronomy is not the See also:work of any single writer but the result of a long See also:process of development. The fact that it is legislative as well as hortatory is enough to prove this, for most of the See also:laws it contains are found elsewhere in the Pentateuch, sometimes in less See also:developed, sometimes in more developed forms, a fact which is conclusive See also:proof of prolonged See also:historical development. According to the all-pervading law of See also:evolution, the less complex See also:form must have preceded the more complex. Still, the book does See also:bear the See also:stamp of one See also:master-mind. Its See also:style is as easily recognized as that of Deutero-See also:Isaiah, being as remarkable for its copious diction as for its depths of moral and religious feeling. The See also:original Deuteronomy, D, read to King Josiah, cannot have been so large as our present book, for not only could it be read ata single sitting, but it could be easily read twice in one day. On the day it was found, Shaphan first read it himself, and then went to the king and read it aloud to him. But perhaps the most conclusive proof of its brevity is that it was read publicly to the assembled See also:people immediately before they, as well as their king, pledged themselves to obey it; and not a word is said as to the task of See also:reading it aloud, so as to be heard by such a See also:great multitude, being long or difficult. The legislative See also:part of D consists of fifteen chapters (xii.–xxvi.), which,' however, contain many later insertions. But the impression made upon Josiah by what he heard was far too deep to have been produced by the legislative part alone. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] DEUS, JOAO DE (1830-1896) |
[next] DEUTSCH, IMMANUEL OSCAR MENAHEM (1829-1873) |