Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

LEVITES

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V16, Page 515 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

LEVITES , or sons of See also:

Levi (son of See also:Jacob by Leah), a sacred by See also:Moses. The two classes are supposed to have been founded See also:caste in See also:ancient See also:Israel, the guardians of the See also:temple service at separately (Exod. See also:xxviii., cf. See also:xxix. 9; Num. iii. 6-1o), and so far See also:Jerusalem.' from any degradation being attached to the See also:rank and See also:file of the 1. See also:Place in See also:Ritual.—In the See also:developed hierarchical See also:system the Levites, their position is naturally an See also:honourable one compared ministers of the See also:sanctuary are divided into distinct grades. with that of the See also:mass of non-Levitical worshippers (see Num. All are "Levites " by descent, and are thus correlated in the i. 50-53), and they are taken by Yahweh as a See also:surrogate genealogical and other lists, but the true priesthood is confined for the male first-See also:born of Israel (iii. 11-13). They are inferior to the sons of See also:Aaron, while the mass of the Levites are subordinate only to the Aaronites to whom they are " joined " (xviii. 2, a See also:play servants who are not entitled to approach the See also:altar or to perform on the name Levi) as assistants. Various adjustments and any strictly priestly See also:function. All See also:access to the Deity is restricted modifications still continue, and a number of scattered details to the one priesthood and to the one sanctuary at Jerusalem; may indicate that See also:internal rivalries made themselves See also:felt.

But the worshipping subject is the nation of Israel as a unity,. and the the different steps can hardly be recovered clearly, although the function of See also:

worship is discharged on its behalf by divinely chosen fact that the priesthood was extended beyond the Zadokites to priests. The See also:ordinary individual may not intrude under See also:penalty families of the dispossessed priests points to some See also:compromise of See also:death; only those of Levitical origin may perform service, (1 Chron. See also:xxiv.). Further, it is subsequently found that certain and they are essentially the servants and hereditary See also:serfs of the classes of temple servants, the singers and porters, who had once Aaronite priests (see Num. xviii.). But such a See also:scheme finds no been outside the Levitical See also:gilds, became absorbed as the See also:term place in the See also:monarchy; it presupposes a hierocracy under which " Levite " was widened, and this See also:change is formally expressed by the priesthood increased its rights by claiming the privileges the genealogies which ascribe to Levi, the See also:common " ancestor " which past See also:kings had enjoyed; it is the outcome of a complicated of them all, the singers and even certain families whose heathenish development in Old Testament See also:religion in the See also:light of which it is and See also:foreign names show that they were once merely servants to be followed (see See also:HEBREW RELIGION). of the temple.' First (a), in the earlier biblical writings which describe the See also:state 2. Significance of the Development.—Although the legal basis of affairs under the Hebrew monarchy there is not this funda- for the final See also:stage is found in the legislation of the See also:time of Moses See also:mental distinction among the Levites, and, although a See also:list of (latter See also:part of the second See also:millennium B.c.), it is in reality scarcely Aaronite high-priests is preserved in a See also:late source, internal earlier than the 5th See also:century B.C., and the Jewish theory finds details and the See also:evidence of the See also:historical books render its value analogies when developments of the Levitical service are referred extremely doubtful (1 Chron. vi. 3-15, 49-53). In Jerusalem to See also:David (1 Chron. xv. seq., See also:xxiii. sqq.), See also:Hezekiah (2 Chron. xxix.) itself the subordinate See also:officers of the temple were not members and See also:Josiah (See also:xxxv.)—contrast the See also:history in the earlier books of of a See also:holy gild, but of the royal See also:body-guard, or See also:bond-slaves who See also:Samuel and Kings—or when the still later See also:book of See also:Jubilees had access to the sacred courts, and might even be uncircumcised (xxxii.) places the rise of the Levitical priesthood in the patriarchal foreigners (Josh. ix. 27; 1 Kings xiv. 28; 2 Kings xi.; cf. Zeph. See also:period. The traditional theory of the See also:Mosaic origin of the i. 8 seq.; Zech. xiv.

21). Moreover, ordinary individuals might elaborate Levitical legislation cannot be maintained See also:

save by serve as priests (1 Sam. ii. 1I, 18, vii. 1; see 2 Sam. viii. 18, the most arbitrary and inconsequential treatment of the evidence deliberately altered in I Chron. xviii. 17) ; however, every Levite and by an entire indifference to the historical spirit; and, was a See also:priest, or at least qualified to become one (Deut. x. 8, although numerous points of detail still remain very obscure, the xviii. 7; See also:Judges xvii. 5-13), and when the author of 1 Kings xii. 31, three leading stages in the Levitical institutions are now recogwishes to represent See also:Jeroboam's priests as illegitimate, he does nized by nearly all See also:independent scholars. These stages with a not say that they were not Aaronites, but that they were not of number of concomitant features confirm the See also:literary See also:hypothesis the sons of Levi. that biblical history is in the See also:main due to two leading recensions, The next stage (b) is connected with the suppression of the the Deuteronomic and the Priestly (cf. [b] and [c] above), which See also:local high-places or See also:minor shrines in favour of a central sanctuary. have incorporated older See also:sources.' If the hierarchical system as This involved the suppression of the Levitical priests in the 2 The words " beside that which cometh of the See also:sale of his patricountry (cf. perhaps the allusion in Dent. xxi.

5); and the See also:

present mony " (lit. " his sellings according to the fathers ") are obscure; See also:hook of See also:Deuteronomy, in promulgating the reform, represents they seem to imply some additional source of income which the Levite the Levites as poor scattered " sojourners " and recommends enjoys at the central sanctuary. For the See also:nethinim given ") and See also:children of the slaves of them to the charity of the See also:people (Dent. xii. 12, 18 seq., xiv. 27, See also:Solomon " (whose hereditary service would give them a pre-See also:eminence 29, xvi. I I, 14, See also:xxvi. II sqq.). However, they are permitted to over the temple slaves), see See also:art. NETHINIM, and Benzinger, Ency. congregate at " the place which Yahweh shall choose," where Bib. cols. 3397 sqq• they may perform the usual priestly duties together with their In See also:defence of the traditional view, see S. I. Curtiss, The Levitical brethren who " stand there before Yahweh," and they are Priests (1877), with which his later attitude should be contrasted (see See also:Primitive Semitic Religion To-See also:day, pp.

14, 50, 133 seq., 171, 238 ' For the derivation of " Levi " see below § 4 end. sqq., 241 sqq.) ; W. L. See also:

Baxter, Sanctuary and See also:Sacrifice (1895)-1 it existed in the See also:post-exilic See also:age was really the See also:work of Moses, it is inexplicable that all trace of it was so completely lost that the degradation of the non-Zadokites in See also:Ezekiel was a new feature and a See also:punishment, whereas in the Mosaic See also:law the ordinary Levites, on the traditional view, was already forbidden priestly rights under penalty of death. There is in fact no clear evidence of the existence of a distinction between priests and Levites in any Hebrew See also:writing demonstrably earlier than the Deuteronomic stage, although, even as the See also:Pentateuch contains ordinances which have been carried back by means of a "legal See also:convention " to the days of Moses, writers have occasionally altered earlier records of the history to agree with later standpoints.' No See also:argument in support of the traditional theory can be See also:drawn from the See also:account of Korah's revolt (Num. xvi, sqq., see § 3) or from the Levitical cities (Num. xxxv.; Josh. xxi.). Some of the latter were either not conquered by the Israelites until See also:long after the invasion, or, if conquered, were not held by Levites; and names are wanting of places in which priests are actually known to have lived. Certainly the names are largely identical with ancient holy cities, which, however, are holy because they possessed noted shrines, not because the inhabitants were members of a holy tribe. See also:Gezer and Taanach, for example, are said to have remained in the hands of Canaanites (Judges i. 27, 29; cf. I Kings ix. I6), and See also:recent excavation has shown how far the cultus of these cities was removed from Mosaic religion and ritual and how long the grosser elements persisted.2 On the other See also:hand, the sanctuaries obviously had always their local ministers, all of whom in time could be called Levitical, and it is only in this sense, not in that of the late priestly legislation, that a place like See also:Shechem could ever have been included. Further, instead of holding cities and pasture-grounds, the Levites are sometimes described as scattered and divided (Gen. xlix. 7; Deut. xviii.

6), and though they may naturally possess See also:

property as private individuals, they alone of all the tribes of Israel possess no tribal See also:inheritance (Num. xviii. 23, xxvi. 62; Deut. x. 9; Josh. xiv. 3). This fluctuation finds a parallel in the age at which the Levites were to serve; for neither has any reasonable explanation been found on the traditional view. Num. iv. 3 fixes the age at See also:thirty, although in i. 3 it has been reduced to twenty; but in I Chron. xxiii. 3, David is said to have numbered them from the higher limit, whereas in vv. 24. 27 the See also:lower figure is given on the authority of " the last words (or acts) of David." In Num. viii.

23-26, the age is given as twenty-five, but twenty became usual and recurs in See also:

Ezra iii. 8 and 2 Chron. xxxi. 17. There are, however, independent grounds for believing that I Chron. xxiii. 24, 27, 2 Chron. xxxi. 17 belong to later insertions and that Ezr. iii. 8 is relatively late. When, in accordance with the usual methods of Hebrew genealogical history, the Levites are defined as the descendants of Levi, the third son of Jacob by Leah (Gen. xxix. 34), a literal See also:interpretation is unnecessary, and the only narrative wherein Levi appears as a See also:person evidently delineates under the See also:form of personification events in the history of the Levites (Gen. xxxiv.).3 They take their place in Israel as the tribe set apart for sacred duties, and without entering into the large question how far the tribal schemes can be used for the earlier history A. See also:van Hoonacker, Le Sacerdote levitique (1899) ; and J. Orr, Problem of the O.T. (1905). These and other apologetic writings have so far failed to produce any adequate alternative hypothesis, and while they argue for the traditional theory, later revision not being excluded, the See also:modern See also:critical view accepts late See also:dates for the literary sources in their present form, and explicitly recognizes the presence of much that is ancient.

See also:

Note the curious old tradition that Ezra wrote out the law which had been burnt (2 Esdr. xiv. 21 sqq.). ' For example, in i Kings viii. 4, there are many indications that the context has undergone considerable editing at a fairly late date. The See also:Septuagint translators did not read the clause which speaks of " priests and Levites," and 2 Chron. v. 5 reads " the Levite priests," the phrase characteristic of the Deuteronomic See also:identification of priestly and Levitical See also:ministry. i Sam. vi. 15, too, brings in the Levites, hut the See also:verse breaks the connexion between 14 and 16. For the present disorder in the See also:text of 2 Sam. xv. 24, see the commentaries. 2 See See also:Father H. See also:Vincent, O.P., See also:Canaan d'apres l'exploration recente (190i'), PP. 151, 20o sqq., 463 sq.

3 So Gen. sxxiv. 7, Hamor has wrought folly " in Israel " (cf. Judges xx. 6 and often), and in r. 30 " Jacob " is not a See also:

personal but a collective See also:idea, for he says, " I am a few men," and the See also:capture and destruction of a considerable See also:city is in the nature of things the work of more than two individuals. In the allusion to Levi and See also:Simeon in Gen. xlix. the two are spoken of as " See also:brothers " with a communal See also:assembly. See, for other examples of personification, See also:GENEALOGY: Biblical. 3. The Traditions of the Levites.—In the " Blessing of Moses " (Deut. xxxiii. 8-11), Levi is a collective name for the priesthood, probably that of (See also:north) Israel. He is the See also:guardian of the sacred oracles, knowing no See also:kin, and enjoying his privileges for proofs of fidelity at Massah and Meribah. That these places (in the See also:district of Kadesh) were traditionally associated with the origin of the Levites is suggested by various Levitical stories, although: it is in a narrative now in a context pointing to See also:Horeb or See also:Sinai that the Levites are Israelites who for some cause (now lost) severed themselves from their people and took up a stand on behalf of Yahweh (Exod. xxxii.).

Other evidence allows us to See also:

link together the See also:Kenites, Calebites and Danites in a tradition of some See also:movement into See also:Palestine, evidently quite distinct from the See also:great invasion of Israelite tribes which pre-dominates in the existing records. The priesthood of See also:Dan certainly traced its origin to Moses (Judges xvi'. 9, xviii. 30) ; that of See also:Shiloh claimed an equally high ancestry (I Sam. ii. 27 seq.).' Some tradition of a widespread movement appears to be ascribed to the age of See also:Jehu, whose See also:accession, promoted by the See also:prophet See also:Elisha, marks the end of the conflict between Yahweh and See also:Baal. To a Rechabite (the See also:clan is allied to the Kenites) is definitely ascribed a hand in Jehu's sanguinary See also:measures, and, though little is told of the obviously momentous events, one writer clearly alludes to a bloody period when reforms were to be effected by the See also:sword (r Kings xix. 17). Similarly the See also:story of the See also:original selection of the Levites in the See also:wilderness mentions an uncompromising See also:massacre of idolaters. Consequently, it is very noteworthy that popular tradition preserves the recollection of some attack by the " brothers " Levi and Simeon See E. See also:Meyer, Israeliten is. ihre Nachbarstdmme, pp. 299 sqq. (passim) ; S.

A. See also:

Cook, Ency. Bib. See also:col. 1665 seq.; Grit. Notes on OT. History, pp. 84 sqq., 122-125. The second See also:element of the name See also:Abiathar is connected with Jether or See also:Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, and even Ichabod (1 Sam. iv. 21) seems to be an intentional reshaping of Jochebed, which is elsewhere the name of the See also:mother of Moses. Phinehas, See also:Eli's son, becomes in later writings the name of a prominent Aaronite priest in the days of the See also:exodus from See also:Egypt. IS upon the famous holy city of Shechem to avenge their " See also:sister " Dinah (Gen. xxxiv.), and that a detailed narrative tells of the bloodthirsty though pious Danites who sacked an Ephraimite See also:shrine on their See also:journey to a new See also:home (Judges xvii. sq.). The older records utilized by the Deuteronomic and later compilers indicate some common tradition which has found expression in these varying forms.

Different religious standpoints are represented in the biblical writings, and it is now important to observe that the prophecies of See also:

Hosea unmistakably show another attitude to the Israelite priesthood. The condemnation of Jehu's bloodshed (I-los. i. 4) gives another view of events in which both See also:Elijah and Elisha were concerned, and the change is more vividly realized when it is found that even to Moses and Aaron, the traditional founders of Israelite religion and ritual, is ascribed an offence whereby they incurred Yahweh's wrath (Num. xx. 12, 24, See also:xxvii. 14; Deut. ix. 2o, xxxii. 51). The sanctuaries of Shiloh and Dan lasted until the See also:deportation of Israel (Judges xviii. 30 seq.), and some of their history is still preserved in the account of the late premonarchical age (12th–I ith centuries B.c.). Shiloh's priestly gild is condemned for its iniquity (I Sam. iii. I1-14), the sanctuary mysteriously disappears, and the priests are subsequently found at See also:Nob outside Jerusalem (I Sam. xxi. seq.).

All idea of historical See also:

perspective has been lost, since the fall of Shiloh was apparently a recent event at the See also:close of the 7th century (Jer. vii. 12-15, xxvi. 6-9). But the tendency to ascribe the disasters of See also:northern Israel to the priesthood (see esp. HOSEA) takes another form when an inserted prophecy revokes the privileges of the ancient and honourable See also:family, foretells its over-throw, and announces the rise of a new faithful and See also:everlasting priesthood, at whose hands the dispossessed survivors, reduced to poverty, would beg some priestly See also:office to secure a livelihood (I Sam. ii. 27-36). The sequel to this phase is placed in the reign of Solomon, when David's old priest Abiathar, See also:sole survivor of the priests of Shiloh, is expelled to Anathoth (near Jerusalem), and Zadok becomes the first See also:chief priest contemporary with the See also:foundation of the first temple (1 Kings ii. 27, 35). These situations cannot be severed from what is known elsewhere of the Deuteronomic teaching, of the reform ascribed to Josiah, or of the principle inculcated by Ezekiel (see § i [b]). The late specific tendency in favour of Jerusalem agrees with the Deuteronomic editor of Kings who condemns the sanctuaries of Dan and See also:Bethel for See also:calf-worship (I Kings xii. 28-31), and does not acknowledge the northern priesthood to be Levitical (1 Kings xii.

31, note the interpretation in 2 Chron. xi. 14, xiii. 9). It is from a similar standpoint that Aaron is condemned for the manufacture of the See also:

golden calf, and a compiler (not the original writer) finds its sequel In the See also:election of the faithful Levites.' In the third great stage there is another change in the See also:tone. The present (priestly) recension of Gen. xxxiv. has practically justified Levi and Simeon from its standpoint of opposition to intermarriage, and in spite of Jacob's curse (Gen. xlix. 5-7) later traditions continue to extol the slaughter of the Shechemites as a pious See also:duty. Post-exilic revision has also hopelessly obscured the offence of Moses and Aaron, although there was already a tendency to place the blame upon the people (Deut. i. 37, iii. 26, iv. 21). When two-thirds of the priestly families are said to be Zadokites and one-third are of the families of Abiathar, some reconciliation, some See also:adjustment of rivalries, is to be recognized (1 Chron. xxiv.). Again, in the composite story of Korah's revolt, one version reflects a contest between Aaronites and the other Levites who claimed the priesthood (Num. xvi.

8-11, 36-40), while another shows the supremacy of the Levites as a caste either over the See also:

rest of the people (? cf. the See also:prayer, Deut. xxxiii. II), or, since the latter are under the leadership of Korah, later the eponym of a gild of singers, perhaps over the more subordinate ministers who once formed a See also:separate class.' In the composite work See also:Chronicles-Ezra-See also:Nehemiah (dating after the post-exilic Levitical legislation) a See also:peculiar See also:interest is taken in the Levites, more particularly in the singers, and certain passages even reveal ' With this development in Israelite religion, observe that Judaean cult included the worship of a brazen See also:serpent, the institution of which was ascribed to Moses, and that, according to the compiler of Kings, Hezekiah was the first to destroy it when he suppressed idolatrous worship in See also:Judah (2 Kings xviii. 4). It may be added that the faithful Kenites (found in N. Palestine, Judges iv. II) appear in another light when threatened with captivity by Asshur (Num. xxiv. 22; cf. fall of Dan and Shiloh), and if their eponym is See also:Cain (q.v.), the story of Cain and See also:Abel serves, amid a variety of purposes, to condemn the See also:murder of the settled agriculturist by the See also:nomad, but curiously allows that any See also:retaliation upon Cain shall be avenged (see below, note 5). i The name Korah itself is elsewhere Edomite (Gen. See also:xxxvi. 5, 14, 18) and Calebite (t Chron. ii. 43). See Ency. Bib., s.v.some animus against the Aaronites (2 Chron. xxix.

34, See also:

xxx. 3), A Levite probably had a hand in the work, and this, with the evidence for the Levitical See also:Psalms (see PSALMS), gives the caste an interesting place in the study of the transmission of the biblical records.' But the history of the Levites in the See also:early post-exilic stage and onwards is a separate problem, and the work of See also:criticism has not advanced sufficiently for a proper estimate of the various vicissitudes. However, the feeling which was aroused among the priests when some centuries later the singers obtained from See also:Agrippa the See also:privilege of wearing the priestly See also:linen See also:dress (See also:Josephus, See also:Ant. xx. 9. 6), at least enables one to appreciate more vividly the scantier hints of internal jealousies during the preceding years.' 4. See also:Summary.—From the inevitable conclusion that there are three stages in the written sources for the Levitical institutions, the next step is the correlation of allied traditions on the basis of the genealogical evidence. But the problem of fitting these into the history of Israel still remains The See also:assumption that the earlier sources for the pre-monarchical history, as incorporated by late compilers, are necessarily trustworthy confuses the inquiry (on Gen. xxxiv., see SIMEON), and even the See also:probability of a reforming spirit in Jehu's age depends upon the internal criticism of the related records (see See also:JEWS, §§ 11-14). The view that the Levites came from the See also:south may be combined with the conviction that there Yahweh had his seat (cf. Deut. xxxiii. 2; Judges v. 4; Hab. iii. 3), but the latter is only one view, and the traditions of the patriarchs point to another belief (cf. also Gen. iv.

26). The two are reconciled when the See also:

God of the patriarchs reveals His name for the first time unto Moses (Exod. iii. 15, vi. 3). With these See also:variations is involved the problem of the early history of the Israelites.' Moreover, the real Judaean tendency which associates the fall of Eli's priesthood at Shiloh with the rise of the Zadokites involves the literary problems of Deuteronomy, a composite work whose age is not certainly known, and of the twofold Deuteronomic redaction elsewhere, one phase of which is more distinctly Judaean and See also:anti-Samaritan. There are vicissitudes and varying standpoints which point to a complicated literary history and require some historical back-ground, and, apart from actual changes in the history of the Levites, some See also:allowance must be made for the real See also:character of the circles where the diverse records originated or through which they passed. The See also:key must be sought in the exilic and post-exilic age where, unfortunately, See also:direct and decisive evidence is lacking. It is clear that the Zadokite priests were rendered legitimate by finding a place for their ancestor in the Levitical genealogies—through Phinehas (cf. Num. See also:xxv. 12 seq.), and Aaron—there was a feeling that a legitimate priest must be an Aaronite, but the historical See also:reason for this is uncertain (see R. H.

See also:

Kennett, Journ. Theolog. See also:Stud., 1905, pp. 161 sqq.). Hence, it is impossible at present to trace the earlier steps which led to the See also:grand See also:hierarchy of post-exilic Judaism. Even the name Levite itself is of uncertain origin. Though popularly connected with ldvdh, " be joined, attached," an ethnic from Leah has found some favour; the See also:Assyrian li'u "powerful, See also:wise," has also been suggested. The term has been more plausibly identified with t-v-' (See also:fern. l-v-'-t), the name given in old Arabian See also:inscriptions (e.g. at al-`Ola, south-See also:east of Elath) to the priests and priestesses of the Arabian god Vadd (so especially Hommel, Anc. Heb. Trad., pp. 278 seq.). The date of the evidence, however, has not been fixed with unanimity, and this very 3 The musical service of the temple has no place in the Pentateuch, but was considerably developed under the second temple and attracted the See also:special See also:attention of See also:Greek observers (See also:Theophrastus, apud See also:Porphyry, de Abstin. ii.

26) ; see on this subject, R. Kittel's Handkommentar on Chronicles, pp. 90 sqq. 4 Even the See also:

tithes enjoyed by the Levites (Num. xviii. 21 seq.) were finally transferred to the priests (so in the See also:Talmud: see Yebamoth, fol. 86a, See also:Carpzov, App. ad Godw. p. 624; See also:Hottinger, De Dec. vi. 8, ix. 17). ' For some suggestive remarks on the relation between nomadism and the Levites, and their See also:influence upon Israelite religion and literary tradition, see E. Meyer, See also:Die Israeliten u. ihre Nachbarstdmme (1906), pp. 82-89, 138; on the problems of early Israelite history, see SIMEON (end), JEws, §§ 5, 8, and PALESTINE, History.

attractive and suggestive view requires See also:

confirmation and independent support.

End of Article: LEVITES

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
LEVIS (formerly Pointe Levi)
[next]
LEVITICUS