Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

PSALMS, BOOK

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V22, Page 540 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

PSALMS, See also:BOOK OF 535 already existed in their See also:place in our Psalter, or that Ps. cvi. even existed in its See also:present See also:form. Other See also:evidence of date is to be found in the Levitical psalms of the Elohistic collection. These, as we have seen, form two See also:groups, referred to the sons of Korah and to See also:Asaph. In See also:Nehemiah xii. 46 Asaph is taken to be a contemporary of See also:David and See also:chief of the singers of his See also:time, and in 1 Chron. See also:xxv. 1 seq. one of the three chief singers belonging to the three See also:great Levitical houses. But the older See also:history knows nothing of an individual Asaph; in See also:Ezra ii. 41 the gild of singers as a whole is called Bne Asaph, as it was apparently in the time of Nehemiah (Neh. nrp belonged to the repertoire of the Korahites, or they were xi. 22, Heb.).' The singers or Asaphites are at this time still distinguished from the See also:Levites; the See also:oldest See also:attempt to incorporate them with that tribe appears in Exod. vi. 24, where Abiasaphthat is, the eponym of the gild of Asaphites—is made one of the three sons of Korah. But when singers and Levites were fused the Asaphites ceased to be the only singers, and ultimately, as we see in See also:Chronicles, they were distinguished from the Korahites and reckoned to Gershom (1 Chron. vi.), while the See also:head of the Korahites is Heman, as in the See also:title of Ps. lxxxviii. It is only in the appendix to the Elohistic See also:psalm-book that we find Heman and Ethan See also:side by side with Asaph, as in the Chronicles; but this does not necessarily prove that the See also:body of the collection originated when there were only two See also:gilds of singers.

But here it becomes necessary to ask what is the precise meaning which we are to assign to the phrases, " to David," " to Asaph," " to the sons of Korah." We certainly need not suppose that the Davidic, Asaphic and Korahite psalms severally once existed as See also:

separate books, for, if this had been the See also:case, it is probable that the ascription would not have been prefixed to each separate psalm, but rather to the head of each collection (cf. Prov. i. I, x. 1., xxv. I), together with some such See also:note at the end as is found in See also:Job. xxxi. 4o, Ps. lxxii. 20; moreover we should be compelled to assent to the view expressed in the See also:Oxford See also:Dictionary that those psalms which have the heading rrt4_,=5 (A. V. " to "—R. V. " for "—" the chief Musician ") also originally formed a separate collection. But against this explanation of the heading m?5 there is an almost insuperable objection; for, since both the first and second books contain psalms with this heading, it is clear that, the " Chief Musician's—or Director's—Psalter " must have been in existence before either of these books; in which case, apart from the difficulty of the antiquity which we should be compelled to assign to this earliest Psalter, it is impossible to understand on what principle the first book of Psalms was formed.

If the compiler of the first book aimed simply at making a collection of Davidic psalms from a See also:

major Psalter compiled by the " Director," why should he have deliberately rejected a number of Davidic psalms (Ps. li. sqq.) which, ex hypothesi, See also:lay before him in this Psalter? It is surely as difficult to suppose that the Davidic psalms of the first book are a selection made from a greater collection of such psalms contained in the " Director's Psalter as it is to imagine that St See also:Mark's See also:Gospel is an abridgment of St See also:Matthew's. It is true that the preposition " to " (5) may denote authorship, as it does apparently in See also:Isaiah xxxviii. 9, Hab. iii. 1, but it certainly has a much wider meaning; and indeed in some cases the See also:idea of authorship is out of the question, for the psalms ascribed to the Korahites can scarcely have been supposed to be the See also:joint See also:composition of that body. Moreover, it is very doubtful whether the word 1:W.? can be translated " Director." In I Chron. xv. 21 the verb of which ,yep is the participle is used of the See also:duty which was discharged by Mattithiah, Eliphelehu, Mikneiah, Obed-See also:edom, Jeiel and Azaziah (and perhaps, if See also:verse 20 is to be taken in See also:close connexion with verse 21, by Zecharaiah, Aziel, Shemiramoth, Jeiel, Unni, Eliab, Maaseiah and Benaiah also) on one definite occasion. Unfortunately the exact nature of these men's performances is not quite clear, for it is said to have been connected with " harps set to the sheminith," or according to another See also:interpretation, with " harps over the tenors." But whatever the obscure expression n'r^vn,5u may mean, O7i7 cannot here mean to " See also:direct," for a See also:choir with six " See also:directors " would have been a veritable See also:bear-See also:garden. Obviously the word nw5 must refer to something in the See also:music; and inasmuch as the See also:cymbals were for the purpose of producing a See also:volume of See also:sound (y'=?h5), it is reasonable to suppose that the musicians with See also:treble lutes and with harps an See also:octave See also:lower (or with lutes and harps over the sopranos and tenors respectively) were to See also:lead the singers in giving out the See also:melody. If this explanation he correct—and it certainly accords best with the meaning of Obq} in I Chron. xv. 21—the ngp will be that See also:part of the See also:orchestra which played the melody to be sung, virtually corresponding, mutatis mutandis, to what we now See also:call the choir See also:organ, and we need not complicate the compilation of the Psalter by postulating an altogether unnecessary " Director's Psalter." Now we have seen that the 5 prefixed to n'W '.s cannot refer to authorship ; we seem therefore shut up to one of two alternatives, either the psalms inscribed ' s5 intended to be sung in the Korahite See also:style. It is indeed possible that. each See also:division of the Levitical singers had its own collection; but this is hardly probable unless we are to suppose that they never officiated simultaneously, in which case we should certainly have expected that the psalm quoted by the Chronicler (1 Chron. xvi.) would be included in the Asaphic collection.

But there is no difficulty in supposing that each division of the Levitical musicians had its own traditional music, certain See also:

instruments being See also:peculiar to the one and certain to the other, in which case the See also:assignment of a psalm to the Asaphites or Korahites will merely denote the sort of music to which it is set. In like manner it is not improbable that ss. meant originally " to be sung in the Davidic mode ";2 that is, perhaps, " with See also:harp See also:accompaniment " (cf. i Sam. xvi. 16), or, since the Chronicler ascribes to David the See also:initiation of the See also:Temple music, " in the oldest traditional mode." Under such circumstances, however, a confusion would easily arise between the composer of the tune and the author; and when once the idea had arisen that David was the author of psalms, it would be natural to endeavour to discover in the See also:story of his See also:life suitable occasions for their composition. The interpretation of the titles here suggested removes an objection brought against the See also:assumption of a Maccabaean date for certain psalms, which See also:lays stress on the fact that some of them, e.g. Ps. xliv., are written in a time of the deepest dejection, and yet are psalms of the Temple choirs; whereas, when the Temple was re-opened for See also:worship, after its profanation by See also:Antiochus, the See also:Jews were victorious, and a much more joyful See also:tone was appropriate. For if the titles n77 &c., do not denote that the psalms so inscribed were collected by the Temple choirs, there is no evidence that these psalms were originally sung in the Temple. The earlier collections of psalms may well have been used first in synagogues, and only adapted to the Temple worship when they had become part of the devotional life of the See also:people. It is noteworthy that the psalms quoted by the Chronicler belong to the last collection, books IV. and V., which, as a whole, is far more suitable for liturgical use. Since, then, the existence of separate books of psalms anterior to the present divisions of the Psalter is very doubtful, we must look for other evidences of date. Now, both the Korahite and Asaphic groups of psalms are remarkable that they hardly contain any recognition of present See also:sin on the part of the community of Jewish faith—though they do confess the sin of See also:Israel in the past—but are exercised with the observation that prosperity does not follow righteousness either in the case of the individual (xlix., lxxiii.) or in that of the nation, which suffers notwithstanding its See also:loyalty to See also:God, or even on See also:account thereof (xliv., lxxix.). Now the rise of the problems of individual faith is the mark of the See also:age that followed See also:Jeremiah, while the confident assertion of See also:national righteousness under misfortune is a characteristic mark of pious Judaism after Ezra, in the See also:period of the See also:law but not earlier. See also:Malachi, Ezra and Nehemiah, like See also:Haggai and See also:Zechariah, are still very far from holding that the sin of Israel lies all in the past.

Again, a considerable number of these psalms (xliv., lxxiv., lxxix., lxxx.) point to an See also:

historical situation which can be very definitely realiied. They are See also:post-exilic in their whole tone and belong to a time when prophecy had ceased and the See also:synagogue worship was fully established (lxxiv. 8, 9). But the Jews are no longer the obedient slaves of the oppressing See also:power; there has been a national rising and armies have gone forth to See also:battle. Yet God has not gone forth with them : the See also:heathen have been victorious, See also:blood has flowed like See also:water See also:round See also:Jerusalem, the Temple has been defiled, and these disasters assume the See also:character of a religious persecution. These details would See also:fit the time of religious persecution under Antiochus, to which indeed Ps. lxxiv. is referred (as a prophecy) in I See also:Mace. vii. 16. It is contended by those who, like the See also:late See also:Professor W. See also:Robertson See also:Smith, are opposed to the dating of any psalms of the second collection in the Maccabaean period, that, since they are post-exilic, there is one and only one time in the See also:Persian period to which they can be referred, viz. that of the great See also:civil See also:wars under See also:Artaxerxes III. Ochus (See also:middle of 4th The threefold division of the singers appears in the same See also:list according to the See also:Hebrew See also:text of verse 17, but the occurrence of Jeduthun as a proper name instead of a musical note is suspicious, and makes the text of LXX. preferable. The first clear trace of the triple choir is therefore in Neh. xii. 24.

2 Some See also:

confirmation of this explanation of the titles may be found in the fact that in place of pzwm'S (Ps. xxxix. I) we find in lxii. I, lxxvii. 1, lvnvr-Sy, the latter expression being apparently an See also:abbreviation of lulls; Sip-53t• See also:century, B.C.). But there is no evidence that the Jews were involved collections had arisen; and if, as seems probable, we may identify in these; for the account which See also:Josephus gives of Bagoses' oppres- See also:sion of the Jews represents the trouble as having arisen originally from See also:internal dissensions, and does not hint at anything of the nature of a See also:rebellion against See also:Persia. Moreover the statement of See also:Eusebius (Chron. See also:anno 1658 Abr.) that Artaxerxes Ochus in the course of his See also:campaign against See also:Egypt transported a detachment of Jews to See also:Hyrcania does not prove that See also:Judaea as a whole had revolted. There is nothing even to connect these Jews with See also:Palestine; they may have formed a part of the very considerable Jewish community which we know to have been settled in Egypt as See also:early as the 5th century B.C. On the other See also:hand, it is extremely improbable that the Jews of Judaea, whom Nehemiah had entirely detached from their immediate neighbours, would have taken part in any See also:general rising against Persia. Between them and the See also:Samaritans on the See also:north and the Edomites on the See also:south there was the most implacable hostility, which would probably be sufficient in itself to keep them from joining in the revolts in which other parts of See also:Syria were involved., Moreover, even if the Jews had revolted, it cannot fairly be maintained that such a revolt must necessarily have had a religious character. Even Josephus does not say that the Persians tried to interfere with the Jews in the exercise of their See also:religion; and nothing less than this would satisfy the See also:language of Ps. xliv. 22: " Yea, for thy See also:sake are we killed all the See also:day See also:long," &c. On the other hand, not only is the See also:atmosphere of the second collection of psalms as a whole the atmosphere of godly Judaism in the 2nd century B.C., but it may fairly be claimed that this collection contains many psalms which may naturally be interpreted in the See also:light of the history of that period, of which no satisfactory explanation (in their details) can be given if they are assigned to any other time.

Thus, for example, Ps. xliv., with its description of the sufferings of the righteous for God's sake, would be perfectly appropriate in the mouth of one of the " godly " (Hasidim) about 167 B.c. Ps. xlv., though the unsoundness of the text in certain parts makes it difficult to speak with certainty would suit the See also:

marriage of See also:Alexander Balas at Ptolemais in 15o B.C., at which the high See also:priest See also:Jonathan was present as an honoured See also:guest In this connexion verse to is particularly appropriate as addressed to an See also:Egyptian princess whose forefathers, though their See also:rule had not on the whole been tyrannical, had been regarded by the Jews as heathen oppressors. Again, Ps. Ix., with its ideal description of See also:Jehovah's See also:kingdom as including See also:Gilead, See also:Samaria, See also:Moab, Edom and Philistia, though the ideal was not realized till the days of See also:John See also:Hyrcanus, would be quite appropriate in the mouth of a Maccabaean patriot. The author of Ps. lxviii. would seem to have been inspired by the sight or the description of the never-to-be-forgotten procession of the victorious See also:Maccabees in 164 B.C. to rededicate the desecrated Temple. Hence the taunt to See also:Bashan, the stronghold of the Seleucid See also:government; hence the mention of See also:Judah and See also:Benjamin with the two Galilaean tribes Zebulon and See also:Naphtali (as in Isaiah ix. 1—a passage which on See also:independent grounds has been assigned to the time of See also:Simon Maccabaeus), while schismatic Samaria is completely ignored. The historical back-ground of Ps. lxxix. is apparently the same as that of Ps. xliv. Again, Ps. lxxxvii. would seem to date from a time when the Jews, having won freedom to worship God, were able to look forward to the See also:conversion of their former oppressors (cf. Isaiah xi., xis.). That this psalm was composed at least as late as the 31-d century B.C. is made probable by the name here given to Egypt, Rahab. Having regard to Job. ix.

13, See also:

xxvi. 12, Isaiah li. 9, there can be little doubt that Rahab is the (? Palestinian) name of Tiamat the See also:dragon of the See also:abyss, the natural See also:symbol of the power of darkness, or of the kingdom of the See also:world as opposed to the kingdom of the people of the See also:saints of the Most High God. It is extremely improbable that such a name was applied to Egypt simply because Egypt possessed the See also:crocodile. The origin of its application must be sought in a time when Egypt was regarded as hostile to the people of the See also:Lord—that is to say, during the Ptolemaic rule over Palestine. These considerations, in addition to numerous phrases and expressions which cannot here be noticed, of which the full force can only be See also:felt by those who have specially studied the Maccabaean period and those other portions of the Old Testament, such as Zechariah ix.-xiv., which may plausibly be assigned to it, make it almost certain that the second collection of psalms was made not earlier than the time of Jonathan or even of Simon. Now books IV. and V. are, as we have seen, later than the Elohistic redaction of books II. and III., so that the collection of the last part of the Psalter must, if our See also:argument up to this point is sound, fall within the second See also:half of the 2nd century B.C. And here it is to be noted that though no part of the Psalter shows clearer marks of a liturgical purpose, we find that in hooks IV. and V. the musical titles have entirely disappeared. This does not necessarily prove that " the technical terms of the Temple music had gone out of use, presumably because they were already become unintelligible, as they were when the See also:Septuagint version was made "; for it does not follow that technical musical terms which had originated in the Temple at Jerusalem and were intelligible in Palestine would have been understood in Egypt. The See also:absence of the musical titles, however, may be taken as an indication that the last collection of psalms was formed in a different place from that in which the earlier this place with the Temple at Jerusalem, the absence of musical titles is easily explained, for the number of skilled musicians who there ministered, and who would, of course, possess the tradition of the various modes and tones, would make precise musical directions superfluous. On the other hand, in a collection intended for synagogue use--and the second collection of psalms is as a whole far more suitable to a synagogue than to the Temple—where there would not be a large choir and orchestra of skilled musicians, it would obviously be desirable to See also:state whether the psalm was to be sung to a Davidic, Asaphic or Korahite tone, or to give the name of a melody appropriate to it.

Again, the general tone of large parts of this collection 1s much more cheerful than that of the Elohistic psalm-book. It begins with a psalm (xc.) ascribed in the title to See also:

Moses, and seemingly designed to See also:express feelings appropriate to a situation analogous to that-of the Israelites when, after the weary See also:march through the See also:wilderness, they stood on the See also:borders of the promised See also:land. It looks back on a time of great trouble and forward to a brighter future. In some of the following psalms there are still references to deeds of oppression and violence, but more generally Israel appears as happy under the law, The problems of divine See also:justice are no longer burning questions, the righteousness of God is seen in the peaceful felicity of the pious (xci., xcii., &c.). Israel, indeed, is still scattered and not triumphant over the heathen, but even in the See also:dispersion the Jews are under a mild rule (cvi. 46), and the commercial activity of the nation has begun to develop beyond the seas (cvii. 26 seq.). But some of the psalms refer to a time of struggle and victory. In Ps. cxviii. Israel, led by the See also:house of See also:Aaron—this is a notable point—has emerged triumphant from a desperate conflict, and celebrates at the Temple a great day of rejoicing for the unhoped-for victory: in Ps. cxlix. the saints are pictured with the praises of God in their See also:throat and a See also:sharp See also:sword in their hands to take vengeance on the heathen, to bind their See also:kings and nobles, and exercise against them the See also:judgment written in prophecy. Such an See also:enthusiasm of militant piety, plainly based on actual successes of Israel and the house of Aaron, can only be referred to the first victories of the Maccabees, culminating in the See also:purification of the Temple in 164 B.C. This restoration of the worship of the national See also:sanctuary, under circumstances that inspired religious feelings very different from those of any other See also:generation since the return from See also:Babylon, might most naturally be followed by an See also:extension of the Temple psalmody; it certainly was followed by some liturgical innovations, for the See also:solemn service of See also:dedication on the 25th day of Chisleu was made the See also:pattern of a new See also:annual feast (that mentioned in John X.

22). In later times the psalms for the See also:

encaenia or feast of dedication embraced Ps. See also:xxx. and the See also:hallel Ps. exiii.-cxviii. ; and though Ps. xxx. may have been adapted from a collection already existing, there is every See also:reason to think that the hallel, which especially in its closing part contains allusions that fit no other time so well, was first arranged for the same ceremony. The course of the subsequent history makes it very intelligible that the Psalter was finally closed, as we have seen from the date of the See also:Greek version that it must have been, within a few years at most after this great event.' From the time of Hyrcanus downwards the ideal of the princely high priests became more and more divergent from the ideal of the pious in Israel, and in the Psalter of See also:Solomon we see religious See also:poetry turned against the lords of the Temple and its worship. All this does not, of course, imply that there are not in books IV. and V. any pieces older than the completion of books II. and III., for the composition of a poem and its See also:acceptance as part of the Levitical See also:liturgy are not necessarily coincident in date, except in psalms written with a direct liturgical purpose. In the fifteen " songs of degrees " (Ps. cxx.-cxxxiv.) we have a case in point. According to the Mishna (Middoth. ii. 5) and other Jewish traditions, these psalms were sung by the Levites at the Feast of See also:Tabernacles on the fifteen steps or degrees that led from the See also:women's to the men's See also:court. But when we look at the psalms themselves we see that they must originally have been a hymn-book, not for the Levites, but for the laity who came up to Jerusalem at the great See also:pilgrimage feasts, and who themselves remembered, or their fathers had told them, the days when, as we see in Ps. xlii., it was impossible to make pilgrimage to See also:Zion. They are See also:hymns of the laity, describing with much beauty and See also:depth of feeling the emotions of the See also:pilgrim when his feet stood within the See also:gates of Jerusalem, when he looked forth on the encircling hills, when he felt how See also:good it was to be camping side by side with his brethren on the slopes of Zion (cxxxiii.), when a sense of Jehovah's forgiving See also:grace and the certainty of the redemption of Israel triumphed over all the evils of the present and filled his soul with humble and patient See also:hope. The titles which ascribe four of the pilgrimage songs to David and one to Solomon are lacking in the true LXX., and inconsistent with the contents of the psalms. Better attested, because found in the LXX. as well as in the Hebrew, and therefore probably as old as the collection itself, are the name of Moses in Ps. xc. and that of David in Ps. ci., cii., cviii.-cx., cxxxviii.-cxlv.

But where did the last collectors of the psalms find such very See also:

ancient pieces which had ' Possibly under Simon; compare the other hallel (Ps. cxlvi.-cl. with 1 Mace. xiii. 5o seq. been passed by all previous collectors, and what criterion was there to establish their genuineness? No See also:canon of See also:literary See also:criticism can treat as valuable See also:external evidence an See also:attestation which first appears so many centuries after the supposed date of the poems, especially when it is confronted by facts so conclusive as that Ps. evil'. is made up of extracts from Ps. lvii. and lx. and that Ps. cxxxix. is marked by its language as one of the latest pieces in the book. The only possible question for the critic is whether the ascription of these psalms to David was due to the idea that he was the psalmist See also:par excellence,' to whom any poem of unknown origin was naturally ascribed, or whether we have in some at least of these titles an ex-ample of the See also:habit so See also:common in later Jewish literature of See also:writing in the name of ancient worthies. In the case of Ps. xc. it can hardly be doubted that this is the real explanation, and the same account must be given of the title in Ps. cxlv., if, as seems probable, it is meant to See also:cover the whole of the great hallel or tehilla (Ps. cxly.=cl.), which must, from the allusions in Ps. cxlix., as well as from its place, be almost if not quite the latest thing in the Psalter. For the later stages of the history of the Psalter we have, as we have seen, a See also:fair amount of evidence pointing to conclusions of a See also:pretty definite See also:kind. We have still to consider the two great groups of psalms ascribed to David in books I. and II. We have endeavoured to show that the ascription " to David " in these groups did not originally denote authorship by David, and that, notwithstanding the subscription of Ps. lxxii., which may well be a later note, there is no See also:necessity to suppose an See also:original collection of Davidic psalms from which excerpts were made. It is, however, probable that the title soon came to be understood of David's authorship, with the result That further notes were added indicating the situation in David's life to which the psalms appeared to be appropriate. It is certainly not impossible that the two groups of " Davidic psalms once formed separate collections independently compiled, and that the subscription to Ps. Ixxii. originally stood at the end of the second collection; for in book I. every psalm, except the See also:introductory poems i. and ii. and the late Ps. xxxiii., which may have been added as a liturgical sequel to Ps. xxxii., bears the title " of David," and in like manner the See also:group Ps. li.–Ixxii., though it contains a few See also:anonymous pieces and one psalm which is either " of," or rather, according to the oldest tradition, " for Solomon," is composed of " Davidic " psalms.

It would seem also that the collectors of books I.–III. know of no Davidic psalms outside of these two collections, for Ps. lxxxvi. in the appendix to the Elohistic collection is merely a See also:

cento of quotations from Davidic pieces with a verse or two from See also:Exodus and Jeremiah. Now that the ascription " to David " was understood of David's authorship before the time of the LXX. is clear from such titles as that of Ps. xviii., for example, but there is no evidence that in early times David was regarded as the author of any of the psalms. Even the Chronicler, though he regarded David as the great founder of the Temple music, does not quote any psalm as composed by him, and the Chronicler's omission of 2 Sam. xxii.–See also:xxiii. 7 makes it probable that this See also:section has been inserted in the book of See also:Samuel since he wrote. If, as is possible, Ecclus. xlvii. 8 is a See also:reminiscence of Ps. ix. 2 and Ps. xviii. 2, we should indeed naturally infer that these two psalms were regarded by See also:Ben Sira as the See also:work of David ; but this would prove nothing as to the date of the collection in which we now have them. It may fairly be contended therefore that the tradition that David is the author of the psalms which are assigned to him in books I. and II. comes to us from a period later than that in which the Chronicler wrote. And it is not too much to say that that view—which to some extent appears in the historical psalms of the Ehohistic Psalter—implies See also:absolute incapacity to understand the difference between old Israel and later Judaism, and makes almost anything possible in the way of the ascription of comparatively See also:modern pieces to ancient authors. In any case the titles are manifestly the product of the same uncritical spirit as we have just been speaking of, for not only are many of the titles certainly wrong, but they are wrong in such a way as to prove that they date from an age to which David was merely the abstract psalmist and which had no idea whatever of the historical conditions of his age. For example, Ps. xx. xxi. are not spoken by a See also:king but addressed to a king by his people; Ps. v. See also:xxvii. allude to the Temple (which did not exist in David's time) and the author of the latter psalm desires to live there continually.

Even in the older Davidic psalm-book there is a whole See also:

series of hymns in which the writer identifies himself with the poor and needy, the righteous people of God suffering in silence at the hands of the wicked, without other hope than patiently to wait for the interposition of Jehovah (Ps. xii., xxv., See also:xxxvii., xxxviii., &c.). Nothing can be further removed than this from any possible situation in the life of the David of the books of Samuel, and the case is still worse in the second Davidic collection, especially where we have in the titles definite notes as to the historical occasion on which the poems are supposed to have been written. To refer Ps. lii. to Doeg, Ps. liv. to the Ziphites, Ps. lix. to David when watched in his house by See also:Saul, implies an absolute lack of the very elements of historical judgment. Even the See also:bare names of the. old history were no longer correctly known ' The explanation of 11-, suggested above offers another alter-. nat.ve.—R.'H. Kwhen See also:Abimelech (the See also:Philistine king in the stories of See also:Abraham and See also:Isaac) could be substituted in the title of Ps. xxxiv. for Achish, king of See also:Gath. In a word, the ascription of these two collections to David has none of the characters of a genuine historical tradition. At the same time it is clear that the two collections do not stand on quite the same footing. The second collection of " Davidic " psalms, as well as the Korahite and Asaphic psalms, have been subjected to an Elohistic redaction, for which we must find a reason if the history of the Psalter is to be written. An explanation that naturally suggests itself is that, at the time when books II. and III. (with the exception of the appendix, Ps. lxxxiv.–Ixxxix.) were collected, it was already the See also:custom, from motives of reverence, to abstain from pronouncing the See also:Tetragrammaton. Upon this sup-position it might be explained that book I. was collected before this See also:scruple arose, and books IV. and V. when the custom had arisen of substituting in See also:reading the word Adonai.

But, as we have seen, it is impossible to separate the contents of the Elohistic books from those of the last collection. Both include psalms which are most naturally understood as referring to the persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes and to the Maccabaean victories, and cannot therefore be separated by a long See also:

interval of time. Moreover the scruple as to the See also:pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton seems to have arisen earlier, as in the LXX. version of the See also:Pentateuch nrn' is represented by KGpmr. And further, if the Elohistic redaction was due merely to a See also:desire to avoid pronouncing the divine name, why was not the presumably earlier collection of psalms in book I. subjected to a similar redaction? It is therefore difficult to suppose that the Jewish See also:Church as a whole passed through a See also:stage in which it was felt desirable to substitute o,nl,H in writing for rnn'. There is, however, no difficulty in supposing that such a thing was done in some sections of the Jewish Church, and it is probable that we must look for an explanation of the peculiarity not to the time but to the place where the second collection was formed. Now it must be frankly admitted that the earlier books of psalms exhibit no particular suitability for the Temple services. It is only in the last collection, books IV. and V., that we find any number of psalms appropriate to such a See also:ritual as that of the Temple, and it is difficult to resist the conviction that the earlier collections were made for use, not in the Temple at Jerusalem but in some synagogue or synagogues. Thus, for example, the numerous psalms in which the poets, though speaking perhaps, not as individuals but as members of a class, describe themselves as poor and afflicted at the hands of certain ungodly men, who appear to be Jews, can hardly have been originally collected by the Temple choirs. For since the ministers of the Temple at Jerusalem were the See also:aristocracy of the land, and were often, as we know both from the book of Malachi and from the history of the Maccabees, the chief offenders, it is extremely unlikely that they collected for the See also:official services of the Temple compositions directed against themselves. It is also remarkable that hymns such as Exodus xv., which would be specially suitable to the Temple, find no place in the Psalter. More-over, in Ps. xl_, we have the striking assertion, which surely did not originate in the Temple, that God has no delight in See also:sacrifice and offerings.

On the other hand, the first collection of " Davidic psalms taken as a whole would be perfectly appropriate in the worship of a Judaean community of Hasidim in the Maccabaean period. We have, unfortunately, no See also:

information as to the origin of synagogues, but their existence in pre-Maccabaean times may be inferred not only from the statement in Ps. lxxiv. 8, but also from the fact that there must have been some rallying points for the religion of the Hasidim: besides that supplied by occasional visits or pilgrimages to Jerusalem. We need not suppose that congregations gathered together to worship away from Jerusalem, especially in times of See also:distress, would necessarily sing the religious poems which they had collected, though it is by no means improbable that they would do so. At any See also:rate, Ps. cxxxvii. 4 may fairly be taken as evidence that those heathen among whom the Jews dwelt " in a See also:strange land " had heard and admired the " songs of Zion." Certainly in happier times, when the worst period of See also:storm and stress was over, there would be a desire to enliven the services with music, which would naturally be borrowed from the traditional music of the great national sanctuary. In thus assigning the first collection of psalms to some Judaean community of Hasidim in the earlier Maccabaean period we need not conclude that all the psalms contained in this collection were first composed at this time. Although there is no psalm which can be shown with any See also:probability to be pre-exilic, it is not impossible that there are some which date from as early a time as the age of Zerubbabel, by whose See also:appointment national hopes were raised to so high a See also:pitch. Thus, for example, Ps. xviii., xx., xxi., which in some respects recall the language of the See also:song ascribed to Hannah in I Sam. u., may possibly, like that song, be referred to this period. It must, however, be admitted that as a whole the psalms of the first collection are more suitable to a later date. Ps. viii., which is almost certainly quoted in job. vii. 17, need not have been composed long before the book in which it is quoted: the references to the " godly " and to their persecutions at the hands of wicked men, who seem to be Jews, recall the Maccabaean age; in Ps. xxii. the See also:speaker, who is not an individual but speaks in the name of a community, bears a remark-able resemblance to the " suffering servant " of Isaiah lii.

13–liii. and of this last passage it may be said that all the translatable portions of it can be naturally explained, if it refers to the time when the resistance of the Hasidim, whom the See also:

Sadducees had despised and shunned, had won freedom for Israel as a whole, and at no other known period; the fragment, Ps. See also:xxiv. 7-10, is most easily understood of the time when the Lord who had shown Himself strong and mighty by His victories over the heathen returned in See also:triumph to His Temple in 164 B.c.—in the days of Zerubbabel or of Nehemiah Jehovah had not recently shown Himself " mighty in battle." In the light of these circumstances—and space here forbids more than the scantiest reference—we may reasonably suppose that the first book, with the exception of Ps. i., ii. and possibly xxxiii., is a collection of psalms in the shape which it assumed in a Judaean synagogue in the earlier days of the Maccabaean victories. We have already noticed the difficulty of supposing that the Elohistic Psalter was compiled in a place where a Jehovistic Psalter was already in use. It is therefore probable that the second collection of psalms (books II. and III.), containing as it does an Elohistic recension of a psalm occurring in book I. in a Jehovistic form, must have been compiled for use in some other See also:district. Since the last collection (books IV. and V.) which may reasonably be assigned to the Temple at Jerusalem uses freely the name n ', it may be inferred that the district where an objection was felt to writing the Tetragrammaton was some distance from Jerusalem, and probably not in such close See also:touch with it as most of the See also:country districts of Judaea would be. Such a district we may find in See also:southern See also:Galilee, " the land of Zebulon and the land of Naphtali," apparently the only portion of Palestine north of Samaria where the worshippers of Jehovah existed in any considerable See also:numbers. It is at least remark-able that the names Zebulon and Naphtali in Isaiah ix. I (a passage which, as has been already noted, is probably Maccabaean) denote the region which had felt the brunt of the persecution of the heathen, while in Ps. lxviii. 27 (a poem of which every translatable verse is explicable if it refers to the great procession at the rededication of the Temple in 164 B.c.) the same two tribes are joined with Judah and Benjamin (sc. Judaea) as celebrating the Lord's victory. The dissenting inhabitants of Samaria are naturally absent from such a festival.

It is not improbable that the Elohistic redaction of the second collection of psalms is due not so much to any Jewish scruples about writing the Tetragrammaton as to the fear that it might fall into the hands of the heathen who were trying to destroy the Hebrew Scriptures, and might thus be desecrated (cf. i Mace. 1. 56, 57). We may thus suppose that about the time of Jonathan the Maccabaean High Priest (if our explanation of Ps. xlv. is correct), at all events not earlier than 150 B.C., a south Galilaean synagogue made a collection of the various religious poems current among its members. Perhaps those which were to be sung according to the old Davidic mode formed the See also:

nucleus of the collection, and to these were added other poems to be sung according to the more intricate Korahite and Asaphic modes. The appendix to this collection (Ps. lxxxiv.–lxxxix.) being non-Elohistic presumably was collected else-where. It is possible that these last-mentioned psalms were originally an appendix to the Judaean collection and have been removed from their original place to after the other Levitical psalms. In books IV. and V. we have a collection probably made originally for use in the Temple, consisting in the See also:main of See also:recent hymns, but embodying, at least to some extent, older traditional hymns of the Temple. On this See also:hypothesis we are able to explain the presence of certain poetical pieces both in the book of Chronicles and in the Psalter. We need not suppose that the Chronicler quotes from the Psalter or See also:vice versa, the See also:matter which they have in common being probably derived from certain traditional songs current among the Levitical singers. Since this last collection includes a psalm (cx.) which can scarcely refer to any one earlier than Simon the Maccabee, and cannot well be later than his time, we are justified in assigning the compilation of this collection to about the See also:year 140 B.C. But by this time a great See also:change had taken place in the aims and aspirations of the Jews.

The earlier Maccabaean policy of concentration had given place to one of expansion. The Jews in Jerusalem could not ignore the Jews of Galilee or even of the Dispersion. The hymns which had brought comfort to the faithful in the time of their distress had become an integral part of their religion which could not be given up. Jerusalem was now the religious See also:

metropolis of a great nation, and accordingly it was felt desirable that the hymn-books of the several parts of the nation should be combined into a hymn-book for the whole. The synagogue collections, since they contained psalms which at this time were probably considered to be the work of David, were placed first, and the Temple collection added to them. There was then prefixed to the whole collection a hymn (Ps. ii.) describing the hoped-for greatness of Simon's kingdom, and finally Pharisaic sentiment prefaced the whole by a psalm in praise of the law. In the final compilation, or perhaps in a subsequent redaction, some alterations were made in the original See also:order, some notes were added describing the circumstances in which various psalms had been composed, and lastly, in order to assimilate the outward form of the Psalter to that of the Pentateuch, the three collections were divided into five books. The final redaction is probably to be dated between the years 140 and 130 B.C. Musical See also:Execution and Place of the Psalms in the Temple Service.—The musical notes found in the titles of the psalms and occasionally also in the text (Selah,1 Higgaion) are so obscure that it seems unnecessary to enter here upon the various conjectures that have been made about them. The clearest point is that a number of the psalms were originally at least set to melodies named after songs,2 and that one of these songs beginning nnwn-5H (Al-tasllith in E. V., Ps. lvii. seq.), may be probably identified with the vintage song, Isa. lxv. 8.

The original music of the psalms was therefore apparently based on popular melodies. A good See also:

deal is said about the musical services of the Levites in Chronicles, both in the account given of David's ordinances and in the descriptions of particular festival occasions. But unfortunately it has not been found possible to get from these accounts any clear picture of the ritual of any certainty as to the technical terms used. In Egypt by the translators of the Septuagint these terms were not understood. The music of the temple attracted the See also:attention of See also:Theophrastus (ap. Porph. De abst. ii. 26), who was perhaps the first of the Greeks to make observations on the Jews. His description of the Temple ritual is not strictly accurate, but he speaks of the worshippers as passing the See also:night in gazing at the stars and calling on God in See also:prayer; his words, if they do not exactly fit anything in the later ritual, are well fitted to illustrate the original liturgical use of Ps. viii., cxxxiv. Some of the Jewish traditions as to the use of particular psalms have been already cited; it may be added that the Mishna (Tamid) assigns to the service of the continual burnt-offerings the following weekly See also:cycle of psalms.—(1) xxiv., (2) xlviii., (3) lxxxi., (4) xciv., (5) lxxxi., (6) xciii., (See also:Sabbath) xcii., as in the title. Many other details are given in the See also:treatise Soferim, but these for the most part refer primarily to the synagogue service after the destruction of the Temple. For details on the liturgical use of the Psalter in Christendom the reader may refer to Smith's Dict.

Chr. See also:

Ant., s.v. " Psalmody." Ancient Versions.—(A) The oldest version, the LXX., follows a text generally closely corresponding to the Massoretic Hebrew, the main See also:variations being in the titles and in the addition (lacking in some See also:MSS.) of an apocryphal psalm ascribed to David when he fought with See also:Goliath. Ps. ix. and x. are rightly taken as one psalm, but conversely Ps. cxlvii. is divided into two. The LXX. text has many " daughters," of which may be noticed (a) the Memphitic (ed. See also:Lagarde, 1875); (b) the old Latin, which as revised by See also:Jerome in 383 after the current Greek text forms the Psalterium romanum, long read in the See also:Roman Church and still used in St See also:Peter's; (c) various Arabic versions, including that printed in the polyglots of Le See also:Jay and See also:Walton, and two others of the four exhibited together in Lagarde's Psalterium, Job, Proverbia, arabice, 1876; on the relations and history of these versions see G. See also:Hoffmann, in Jenaer Literaturz., 1876, See also:art. 539; the See also:fourth of Lagarde's versions is from the Peshito. The Hexaplar text of the LXX., as reduced by See also:Origen into greater conformity with the Hebrew by the aid of subsequent Greek versions, was further the See also:mother (d) of the Psalterium gallicanum —that is, of Jerome's second revision of the Psalter (385) by the aid of the Hexaplar text; this edition became current in See also:Gaul and ultimately was taken into the See also:Vulgate; (e) of the Syro-Hexaplar version (published by Bugati, 1820, and in facsimile from the famous Ambrosian MS. by Ceriani, See also:Milan, 1874). (B) The See also:Christian Aramaic version or Peshito (P'shitta) is largely influenced by the LXX., compare Baethgen, Untersuchungen caber See also:die Psalmen nach der Peschita, See also:Kiel, 1878 (unfinished). 1 Of the various explanations that have been given of Selah the only one which possesses any probability is that given independently by Baethgen and others, viz. that it is a mispronunciation of an original n p =tpaxX€. The word, which was probably derived from some Greek bandmaster, was presumably an instruction for a musical interlude.

The LXX. translators who render it by Slh,/aXµa though not recognizing the derivation of the word, knew its meaning. —R. H. K. 2 Compare the similar way of citing melodies with the prep. 'al or 'al kala, &c., in See also:

Syriac (Land, Anecd. iv.; Ephr. syr. hymni, ed. Lamy). This version has peculiar titles taken from Eusebius and See also:Theodore of Mopsuestia (see Nestle, in Theol. Literaturz., 1876, p. 283). (C) The Jewish Aramaic version or See also:Targum is probably a late work.' The most convenient edition is in Lagarde, Hagiographa chaldaice, 1873. (D) The best of all the old versions is that made by Jerome after the Hebrew in 405.

It did not, however, obtain ecclesiastical currency—the old versions holding their ground, just as See also:

English churchmen still read the Psalms in the version of the " Great See also:Bible " printed in their Prayer Book. This important version was first published in a good text by Lagarde, Psalterium juxta hebraeos hieronymi (See also:Leipzig, 1874). Exegetical See also:Works.—While some works of patristic writers are still of value for text criticism and for the history of early exegetical tradition, the treatment of the Psalms by ancient and See also:medieval Christian writers is as a whole such as to throw light on the ideas of the commentators and their times rather than on the sense of a text which most of them knew only through See also:translations. For the Psalms, as for the other books of the Old Testament, the scholars of the period of the revival of Hebrew studies about the time of the See also:Reformation were mainly dependent on the ancient versions and on the Jewish scholars of the middle ages. In the latter class Kimhi stands pre-eminent ; to the See also:editions of his commentary on the Psalms enumerated in the See also:article KIMH1 must now be added the admirable edition of Dr See also:Schiller-Szinessy (See also:Cambridge, 1883), containing, unfortunately, only the first book of his longer commentary. Among the works of older Christian scholars since the revival of letters, the commentary of See also:Calvin (1557) full of religious insight and sound thought—and the laborious work of M. Geier (1668, 1681 el saepius) may still be consulted with See also:advantage, but for most purposes Rosenmuller's Scholia in Psalms (2nd ed., 1831–1822) supersedes the necessity of frequent reference to the predecessors of that industrious compiler. Of more recent works the freshest and most indispensable are See also:Ewald's, in the first two half-volumes of his Dickler See also:des See also:alien Bundes (2nd ed., See also:Gottingen, 1866; Eng. trans., 1880), and See also:Olshausen's (1853). To these may be added (excluding general commentaries on the Old Testament) the two acute but wayward commentaries of See also:Hitzig (1836, 186 1865), that of See also:Delitzsch (1859–186o, then in shorter form in several editions since 1867; Eng. trans., 1871), and that of See also:Hupfeld (2nd ed. by See also:Riehm, 1867, 2 vols.). The last-named work, though lacking in original power and clearness of judgment, is extremely convenient and useful, and has had an See also:influence perhaps disproportionate to its real exegetical merits. The question of the text was first properly raised by Olshausen, and has since received See also:special attention from, among others, Lagarde (Prophetae chald., 1872, p. 46 seq.), Dyserinck (in the " scholia " to his Dutch See also:translation of the Psalms, Theol.

Tijdschr., 1878, p. 279 seq.), and Bickell (Camilla V. T. metrice, &c., See also:

Innsbruck, 1882), whose See also:critical services are not to he judged merely by the measure of assent which his metrical theories may command. In English we have, among others, the useful work of See also:Perowne (5th ed., 1883), that of See also:Lowe and Jennings, (2nd ed., 1885), and the valuable translation of See also:Cheyne (1884). The See also:mass of literature on the Psalms is so enormous that no full list even of recent commentaries can be here attempted, much less an enumeration of See also:treatises on individual psalms and special critical questions. For the latter See also:Kuenen's Onderzoek, vol. iii., is, up to its date (1865). the most See also:complete, and the new edition now in preparation will doubtless prove the See also:standard work of reference. As regards the See also:dates and historical interpretation of the Psalms, all older discussions, even those of Ewald, are in great measure antiquated by recent progress in Pentateuch criticism and the history of the canon, and an entirely fresh treatment of the Psalter by a sober critical commentator is urgently needed. The bibliography up to this point is taken from the article PSALMS by the late Professor W. Robertson Smith (Ency. Brit., 1886), large portions of which are incorporated in the present article. It was the belief of Professor Robertson Smith that the second (Elohistic) collection of psalms originated in a time of persecution earlier than the time of Antiochus Epiphanes which he referred to the reign of Artaxerxes-III. Ochus.

This theory, which he set forth with all his accustomed learning and force, is still accepted in many quarters, many other passages of the Oid Testament being likewise assigned to the same date. In the judgment of the present writer however, the results of Old Testament study (particularly in the Prophets) since Professor Robertson Smith's See also:

death have shown that this theory is untenable. Notwithstanding his reverence, therefore, for the great See also:scholar with whose name it is associated, and to whose memory he would pay both grateful and humble See also:tribute, he has ventured to omit or rewrite all, those portions of the original article which he considers no longer tenable, while retaining every word which is still valuable. Of the works on the Psalms which have appeared since the first publication of Professor W. Robertson Smith's article the following may be specially noticed: Cheyne, The Book of Psalms (1888), The ' It contains, however, elements which are as early as the time of the New Testament. Cf. Ps. lxviii. 18 with Ephes. iv. 8. Origin of the Psalter, See also:Bampton Lectures (1891), and the article Psalms (in Ency. Bib., 1902) ; Bickell, Die Dichtungen der Hebraer (3 der Psalter, 1883), from a revised and metrically arranged text; Baethgen, in Nowack's Hand-Komm. (1892) ; See also:Wellhausen, in Sacred Books of the Old Test.

(Eng. trans. by See also:

Furness, J. See also:Taylor and See also:Paterson, 1898) ; Duhm, in See also:Marti's Kurzer Hand-See also:Comm. (1899) ; Kirkpatrick, in Cambridge Bible for See also:Schools (1893–1895); W. T. See also:Davison, in See also:Hastings's Dict. Bible (1902) ; See also:Driver, The Parallel Psalter (1904) ; C. A. and E. G. See also:Briggs, " Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Psalms," vol. i. (1906), vol. ii. (1907), in See also:International Critical Commentary. (R.

H.

End of Article: PSALMS, BOOK

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
PSALMANAZAR, GEORGE (c. 1679–1763)
[next]
PSALMS, BOOK OF, or PSALTER