|
See also:HITZIG, See also:FERDINAND (1807-1875) , See also:German biblical critic, was See also:born at Hauingen, See also:Baden, where his See also:father was a pastor, on the 23rd of See also:June 1807. He studied See also:theology at See also:Heidelberg under H. E. G. See also:Paulus, at See also:Halle under Wilhelm Gesenius and at See also:Gottingen under See also:Ewald. Returning to Heidelberg he became Privatdozent in theology in 1829, and in 1831 published his Begriff der Kritik am See also:- ALLEN, BOG OF
- ALLEN, ETHAN (1739–1789)
- ALLEN, GRANT CHARLES GRANT BLAIRFINDIEI, (1848–1899)
- ALLEN, JAMES LANE (1850– )
- ALLEN, JOHN (1476–1534)
- ALLEN, or ALLEYN, THOMAS (1542-1632)
- ALLEN, WILLIAM (1532-1594)
- ALLEN, WILLIAM FRANCIS (183o-1889)
Allen Testamente praktisch ervrtert, a study of Old Testament See also:criticism in which he explained the See also:critical principles of the grammatico-See also:historical school, and his See also:Des Propheten See also:Jonas Orakel uber See also:Moab, an exposition of the 15th and 16th chapters of the See also:book of See also:Isaiah attributed by him to the See also:prophet See also:Jonah mentioned in 2 See also:Kings xiv. 25. In 1833 he was called to the university of See also:Zurich as See also:professor ordinarius of theology. His next See also:work was a commentary on Isaiah with a See also:translation (Ubersetzung u. Auslegung des Propheten Jesajas), which he dedicated to Heinrich Ewald, and which See also:Hermann See also:Hupfeld (1796–1866), well known as a commentator on the See also:Psalms (1855-1861), pronounced to be his best exegetical work. At Zurich he laboured for a See also:period of twenty-eight years, during which, besides commentaries on The Psalms (1835–1836; 2nd ed.; 1863–1865), The See also:Minor Prophets (1838; 3rd ed., 1863), See also:Jeremiah (184r; 2nd ed., 1866), See also:Ezekiel (1847), See also:Daniel (185o), See also:Ecclesiastes (1847), See also:Canticles (1855), and See also:Proverbs (1858), he published a monograph, Uber Johannes Markus u. See also:seine Schriften (1843), in which he maintained the See also:chronological priority of the second See also:gospel, and sought to prove that the See also:Apocalypse was written by the same author. He also published various treatisesof archaeological See also:interest, of which the most important are See also:Die Erfindung des Alphabets (184o), Urgeschichte u. Mythologie der Philistder (1845), and Die Grabschrift des Eschmunezar(1855). After the See also:death of See also:Friedrich Umbreit (1795–1860), one of the founders of the well-known Studien and Kritiken, he was called in 1861 to succeed him as professor of theology at Heidelberg. Here he wrote his Geschichte des Volkes See also:Israel (1869-187o), in two parts, extending respectively to the end of the See also:Persian domination and to the fall of Masada, A.D. 72, as well as a work on the Pauline epistles, Zur Kritik Paulinischer Briefe (187o), on the Moabite See also:- STONE
- STONE (0. Eng. shin; the word is common to Teutonic languages, cf. Ger. Stein, Du. steen, Dan. and Swed. sten; the root is also seen in Gr. aria, pebble)
- STONE, CHARLES POMEROY (1824-1887)
- STONE, EDWARD JAMES (1831-1897)
- STONE, FRANK (1800-1859)
- STONE, GEORGE (1708—1764)
- STONE, LUCY [BLACKWELL] (1818-1893)
- STONE, MARCUS (184o— )
- STONE, NICHOLAS (1586-1647)
Stone, Die Inschrift des Mescha (187o), and on See also:Assyrian, Sprache u. Sprachen Assyriens (1871), besides revising the commentary on See also:Job by See also:Ludwig Hirzel (1802-1841), which was first published in 1839. He was also a contributor to the Monatsschrift des wissenschaftlichen Vereins in Zurich, the Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenlandischen Gesellschaft, the Theologische Studien u. Kritiken, Eduard See also:Zeller's Theologische Jahrbucher, and Adolf See also:Hilgenfeld's Zeitschrift See also:fur wissenschaftliche Theologie. Hitzig died at Heidelberg on the 22nd of See also:January 1875. As a See also:Hebrew philologist he holds high See also:rank; and as a constructive critic he is remarkable for acuteness and sagacity. As a historian, however, some of his speculations have been considered fanciful. " He places the See also:cradle of the . Israelites in the See also:south of See also:Arabia, and, like many other critics, makes the historical times begin only with See also:Moses " (F. Lichtenberger, See also:History of German Theology, p. 569).
His lectures on biblical theology (Vorlesungen iiber biblische Theologie u. messianische Weissagungen) were published in 188o after his death, along with a portrait and See also:biographical See also:sketch byy his See also:- PUPIL (Lat. pupillus, orphan, minor, dim. of pupus, boy, allied to puer, from root pm- or peu-, to beget, cf. "pupa," Lat. for " doll," the name given to the stage intervening between the larval and imaginal stages in certain insects)
pupil, J. J. Kneucker (b. 1840), professor of theology at Heidelberg. See Heinrich See also:Steiner, Ferdinand Hitzig (1882); and Adolf Kamphausen's See also:article in See also:Herzog-Hauck's Realencyklopddie.
HIUNG-NU, HIONG-NU, HEUNG-NU, a See also:people who about the end of the 3rd See also:century B.C. formed, according to See also:Chinese records, a powerful See also:empire from the See also:Great See also:Wall of See also:China to the See also:Caspian. Their ethnical See also:affinities have been much discussed; but it is most probable that they were of the See also:Turki stock, as were the See also:Huns, their later western representatives. They are the first See also:Turkish people mentioned by the Chinese. A theory which seems plausible is that which assumes them to have been a heterogenous collection of Mongol, Tungus, Turki and perhaps even Finnish hordes under a Mongol military See also:caste, though the Mongolo-Tungus See also:element probably predominated. Towards the See also:close of the 1st century of the See also:Christian era the Hiung-nu empire See also:broke up. Their subsequent history is obscure. Some of them seem to have gone westward and settled on the Ural See also:river. These, de Guiques suggests, were the ancestors of the Huns, and many ethnologists hold that the Hiung-nu were the ancestors of the See also:modern See also:Turks.
See See also:Journal Anthropological See also:Institute for 1874; See also:Sir H. H. Howorth, History of the See also:Mongols (1876–188o) ; 6th See also:Congress of Orientalists, See also:Leiden, 1883 (Actes, See also:part iv. pp. 177-195) ; de Guiques, Histoire generale des Huns, des Turcs, des Mongoles, et des autres Zartares occidentaux (1756–1758).
End of Article: HITZIG, FERDINAND (1807-1875)
Additional information and Comments
There are no comments yet for this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.
|
del.icio.us it!