Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
TURKS . The words " Turk " and " See also:Turkish " are used in three senses, See also:political, linguistic and ethnological. Politically, Turk means a See also:Mahommedan subject of the See also:sultan of See also:Turkey. In the See also:East at any See also:rate it is not employed in speaking of Christians, and its application to See also:Arabs, Albanians, Kurds, &c., living in Turkey, though not unusual, is hardly correct. The linguistic use of the name, by which it designates a well-marked See also:division of the Ural-Altaic See also:languages and their speakers, is the most satisfactory. The languages in question are easily identified and defined (see below), and there can be little doubt that they were spoken by the vast See also:majority of the See also:people called Turks since the 6th See also:century of the See also:Christian era. Ethnographically, the use of the word presents difficulties, for it is not easy to differentiate the Turks by physique or customs from allied tribes such as the Finno-Ugrians, Mongolians and Manchus. The See also:Bashkirs, who are probably of Finno-Ugrian stock, speak a Turkish See also:language, and the See also:Magyars, who speak a Ugrian language, have many Turkish characteristics. At the See also:present See also:day there is no difficulty in making a See also:practical distinction between Turks and See also:Mongols. The former speak Turkish languages, are Moslems by See also:religion, live almost entirely in the western See also:half of See also:Asia and fall within the Arabic, and to some extent the See also:European, See also:sphere of See also:influence; the latter speak Mongolian languages, are Buddhists by religion, live in the eastern half of Asia and fall within the sphere of See also:Chinese influence. Yet both Turkish and Mongol traditions represent the two nations as descended from two See also:brothers: Jenghiz See also:Khan, the founder of the Mongol See also:power, must have had large See also:numbers of Turks in his armies, for the See also:chief traces See also:left in See also:Europe of the Mongol invasions are the settlements of Turkish-speaking See also:Tatars in See also:Russia; and the name of his son, Jagatai, is commonly used for a Turkish See also:dialect and khanate in the regions of the See also:Oxus. In Central Asia the distinctions between tribes, nations and races are unusually fluid: we are dealing with predatory nomads for ever fighting with one another or with the settled populations See also:round them. The conquerors enslaved the men and married the See also:women of the conquered. a successful See also:leader attracted round his See also:standard men of different tribes and languages. The See also:corps of See also:janissaries instituted by the Turks in Europe is no doubt an See also:illustration of what happened during many centuries in Asia. The Turks after taking See also:Constantinople claimed from the Christian See also:population a certain number of male See also:children, who were brought up as Turkish soldiers with few ties or principles except obedience to their See also:officers. There was thus a large class, of Turkish speech and Turkish habits, who had absolutely no Turkish See also:blood in their See also:veins. In addition to this, intermarriage has taken See also:place to so large an extent that the See also:modern Turks are almost entirely European in physique. Similarly, no doubt, among the hordes of Central Asia the youths of conquered tribes were absorbed and assimilated by the conquerors and lost their See also:original language. Such transformations were facilitated by the fact that there was no See also:great difference in the See also:manners and customs of these tribes. They were all nomadic, mostly horsemen, and rapacious. As they settled down from See also:time to time they borrowed a See also:good See also:deal from their more civilized neighbours, but their natural manner of See also:life was See also:simple and untrammelled. The Turkish-speaking tribes were apparently the most See also:mobile and adventurous. Starting from the confines of See also:China they reached See also:India, See also:Algeria and the walls of See also:Vienna. They probably formed a large contingent in the hordes of Jenghiz and of the See also:Huns, and perhaps the See also:Petchenegs, See also:Avars and Comans all belonged to this See also:group. In comparison with them the Mongol and Manchu-speaking tribes, though conquerors in the East on no mean See also:scale, seem stationary- and inactive, while the Finno-Ugrians are See also:nomad hunters rather than warriors. To the See also:honour of the Turks it must be said that, See also:bad as is their See also:administration when judged by European See also:standards and especially when applied to Europeans, the empires of the See also:Seljuks, Osmanlis and Moguls which they founded rise far above the See also:ordinary standard of ephemeral See also:Oriental dynasties. The effect of Turkish invasions has been in the See also:main destructive, but they have also played a considerable See also:part in transporting both ideas and commodities from one end of the old See also:world to the other. The achievement by which they are best known—the transplantation of Mahommedanism on to European See also:soil—is a remarkable, though not successful, feat of this See also:kind. But they are also largely responsible for the introduction of Mahommedanism into India, for carrying Nestorian See also:Christianity and See also:Persian See also:fire-See also:worship into China, and for the overland intercourse between China and India which fostered if it did not introduce Chinese See also:Buddhism. They exported Chinese See also:silk to See also:Byzantium, and the most See also:ancient Buddhist See also:temple fn See also:Japan contains Persian See also:objects which must have been brought across Asia by their caravans. Divisions.—At the present day the name Turk is applied primarily to the people who have conquered Constantinople and the regions known as Turkey, but the following may be classed as Turkish in the sense of belonging to the same group linguistically and to some extent racially: 1. The Yakuts are a Siberian tribe who inhabit the See also:country near the See also:banks of the See also:middle and See also:lower See also:Lena, including See also:Yakutsk and Verkhoyansk on the Yana. Their language is purely Turkish, though differing considerably from the more western Turkish idioms, but they have largely intermingled with the See also:Tunguses. They are said to be industrious and skilful alike as artisans, traders and agriculturists. They are nominal Christians, but preserve much of their old nature worship. 2. Tatar (q.v.) or See also:Tartar is a popular name which in its most correct sense is applied to Turkish-speaking Moslems in Russia, who number over three millions and are mostly remnants of the Mongol invasion which took place in the 13th century. But it is also extended rather loosely to various tribes in See also:Siberia and elsewhere who speak Mongolian, Finnish or other languages. The following classes of Tatars speak Turkish languages: (a) The Kazan Tatars, numbering perhaps a million. Their centre is in the See also:government of Kazan, but they extend down both banks of the See also:Volga as far as the government of See also:Saratov. (b) The See also:Astrakhan Tatars, numbering only about 'See also:moon. (c) The Bashkirs, whose headquarters are in the government of See also:Ufa. They appear to be a tribe of Finnish origin who have adopted a Turkish language. (d) The Tatars of the See also:Crimea, sometimes called the Krim or Nogai Tatars, who occupied the Crimea in the 13th century and had a considerable See also:empire from the 15th to the 17th century. There are also Nogai Tatars in the See also:Caucasus and See also:Kuban country. (e) There are considerable bodies of Tatars in See also:Rumania and See also:Bulgaria, who appear to be Nogais who have emigrated from the Crimea, See also:Bessarabia and other parts of Russia. (f) The Tatars of the Caucasus seem to be for the most part See also:Azerbaijan Turks mingled with Armenian, Georgian, Lesghian and other blood. But the name is often loosely applied to any Mahommedan Caucasian tribe. 3. See also:Kirghiz (q.v.),' nomadic tribes amounting to about three million souls who are found chiefly in See also:Asiatic Russia. They fall into two chief divisions. (a) The Kazaks, who inhabit the See also:northern and eastern parts of the See also:Aral-See also:Caspian See also:basin, including the government of See also:Orenburg. They do not See also:call themselves Kirghiz, and apparently the name has been given them by the Russians in See also:order not to confuse them with the See also:Cossacks. (b) The Kara-Kirghiz, who are the less numerous division, live in See also:Dzungaria, in the See also:Altai, about lakes See also:Balkash and Issyk-kul, and extend southwards to the See also:Pamirs and the See also:sources of the Oxus. Someof them inhabit Chinese territory. Both divisions live chiefly on the produce of their herds. Their chief drink is See also:koumiss, or fermented See also:mare's See also:milk. 4. The Kara-Kalpaks (q.v.) or See also:Black-caps, who inhabit the See also:south-eastern shores of the See also:sea of Aral, are sometimes classed with the Kirghiz, but seem to be a See also:separate See also:branch of the See also:Turki stock. They are a feeble See also:race, apparently in See also:process of extinction, and now number only about 50,000. 5. Uzbeg is a political and not an ethnological See also:denomination. It is derived from Uzbeg Khan of the See also:Golden See also:Horde (1312-1340), and was subsequently used at the beginning of the 16th century to designate the adherents of Shaibani Khan. Finally it was employed as the name of the ruling tribes in the Central Asian khanates (much like Osmanli in Turkey), in opposition to Kirghiz and Sarts, as well as to non-Turkish tribes. The Uzbegs are accordingly a mixed race, but the elements of which they are composed are mostly Turkish. Their numbers have been estimated at about two millions. They are mostly agriculturists or dwellers in cities, not nomads. 6. Sart is the name commonly given to the Turkish-speaking See also:urban population of the Central Asian khanates. It is opposed to See also:Tajik, which denotes the agricultural, Iranian-speaking population, but both words are used very loosely and have come to mean little more than See also:town and country people. Sart and Uzbeg are also opposed in the meanings of See also:common people and See also:aristocracy, but many Sarts claim Uzbeg descent. The word is hardly suitable for scientific use, but is employed by See also:Russian writers as the name of the Turkish language spoken in See also:Bokhara, See also:Samarkand and See also:Ferghana. 7. The various Turkish tribes found on the eastern slopes of the Tian Shan, in See also:Kashgar, Yarkand, See also:Khotan, &c., are the descendants of the ancient Uighurs or Ouighours. These people were probably the most eastern branch of the Turks who remained behind when the first westward movements were made, but subsequently moved westward themselves. They ruled in Kashgaria from the loth to the 12th centuries, and, like other branches of the Turks, adopted Mahommedanism. They continued, however, to use a variety of the See also:Syriac See also:alphabet introduced by Nestorian missionaries, and a See also:book, the Kudatku Bilik, composed in their language about 1065, is extant. The Taranchis, an agricultural tribe of the See also:Ili basin, seem also to belong to this group. The Turkish spoken in Kashgaria, &c., is often distinguished as Turki. 8. See also:Mogul, Moghul or Mughal, appears to be the same word as Mongol, but is commonly restricted to the tribes who invaded northern India from Ferghana in 1526 under See also:Baber (or Babar) and established the Mahommedan Empire of See also:Delhi. See also:Memoirs written by Baber in Jagatai Turkish are extant. 9. The Koibals and Karagasses of the upper See also:Yenisei are perhaps of Finnish stock, but they speak languages akin to the Kashgarian Turki. They are sometimes called Tatars. to. See also:Turkoman or Turkman is the name usually given to the nomadic tribes who inhabit the country between the Caspian and the Oxus. They appear to be a branch of the Western Turks and not essentially different from the Osmanlis or Azerbaijanis, except that until the Russian occupation of Mery they remained in the See also:condition of predatory See also:horse-See also:riding nomads, much feared by their neighbours as " See also:man-stealing Turks." They are divided into many tribes, of which the See also:principal are (a) The Chaudors in the See also:north-western part of the Ust-Urt and near the Kara-boghaz Gulf. (b) The Yomuts or Yamuds extending from See also:Khiva across the Ust-Urt and along the See also:shore of the Caspian to See also:Persia. (c) The Goklans or Goklens settled in the Persian See also:province of See also:Astarabad. They are said to be the most civilized and friendly of all the Turkomans. (d) The Tekkes, who were the most important tribe when the Russians conquered Transcaspia. They are first heard of in the See also:peninsula of Mangishlak, but were driven out by the Kalmuks in 1718, and subsequently occupied the Akhal and Mery oases. The Russians inflicted a crushing defeat on them at Geok-Tepe in 1881. (e) The Sakars inhabit the left See also:bank of the Oxus near Charjui. (f) The Sariks are found in the neighbourhood of See also:Panjdeh and Yulatan. (g) The Salors, an old and important tribe, suffered much in the course of fights with the Tekkes and in 1857 migrated to Zarabad in Persian territory near the Hari-rud. (h) The Ersaris are now chiefly found near Khoja Salih. They were once a very important tribe on the upper Oxus. (i) The See also:Ali-See also:elis live near See also:Andkhui. r 1. The Turkish nomads scattered over Persian territory are often known by the name of Azerbaijanis or Adharbaijanis, though this name is strictly applicable only to the inhabitants of the province of Azerbaijan (q.v.), of which See also:Tabriz is the See also:capital. They are the descendants of various bodies of Turks who have wandered into Persia at various times, but more particularly of the Ghuzz tribes (the Wen of the Greeks) who invaded it during the Seljuk See also:period. They are also known as Ilat or Iliyat, meaning tribes, and each tribe has its own chieftain or Ilkhani appointed by the shah. Among the tribes are (1) The Kajars, who dwelt in See also:Transcaucasia until Abbas the Great (1585–1628) forced a portion of them to See also:settle near Astarabad. The present See also:dynasty of Persian Shahs comes from this tribe. (2) The Afshars or Awshars are a very numerous tribe in the province of Azerbaijan. Another division of them is found in the See also:Anti-See also:taurus. (3) The Shekakis and Shah-seven. The latter is a political name which has become hereditary, " those who love the shah," i.e. partisans of the Safawi dynasty (1499–1736), and of the Shiite faith. (4) The Karakoyunlu living near the town of See also:Khoi. In the south of Persia are found (5) the Abulwerdis, (6) the Kara-Gozlu, (7) the Baharlu, (8) the Inamlu and (9) the Kashkai. These last perhaps include the Khalaches or Khalaj who were already settled near See also:Herat before the arrival of the Seljuks, and from whom sprang the See also:Indian dynasty known as Khalji (1290-1320). 12. The Turks now inhabiting the Turkish Empire fall into various categories and have entered it at various times. a. The Osmanlis or Ottomans. This word is loosely used to mean any Mahommedan subject of the sultan, though even then it is not generally extended to Arabs and Albanians. Used more strictly it means the See also:clan of See also:Osman and their descendants as opposed to Seljuks and other Turks. The name is genealogical rather than ethnic; for though the exploits of the Osmanlis have given them an importance in modern See also:history far exceeding that of all the other tribes, they are not distinguished from them in language or customs. According to tradition the clan came from See also:Khorasan, supported the Seljuks and received in return the See also:fief of Eskishehr. In the 14th century they took See also:Brusa from the See also:Byzantine Empire and established a See also:kingdom there which withstood the See also:shock of Timur's invasion (1402). In 1453 they captured Constantinople. Until recently Turkish Mahommedans always employed the words Osmanli and Osmanlija to describe themselves and their language, and avoided the expressions Turk and Turkche as signifying semi-civilized tribes, but in the last twenty years the older words have again come into use as See also:national designations. b. There must be many Turks in the See also:Ottoman dominions who have no claim to be called Osmanlis in the strict sense. Byzantine authors mention a See also:colony of 30,000 Turks on the See also:river Vardar in See also:Macedonia as See also:early as the 9th century, and many Turks in Europe are still called Koniots or Konariots and claim to be descendants of the Seljuks. After the defeat of the See also:emperor See also:Romanus at Manzikert (1071) '_lurkomans and Turks of every description poured into Asia See also:Minor. The Tatars of the See also:Dobrudja also seem to be an ancient See also:settlement. c. The Kizil-Bash, or red-heads, who are found in the plains of Asia Minor about See also:Angora, See also:Tokat and Karahissar, differ somewhat from the surrounding Turkish population in both physique and customs. They appear to be immigrants from Persian territory, where some of them still remain. They are industrious agriculturists and their women enjoy unusual freedom. They call themselves Eski-Turk or old Turks, and have a See also:secret religion in which Shiite tenets seem to be combined with See also:elder See also:pagan (or possibly Christian) elements. d. In various parts of western and See also:southern Asia Minor, particularly the plains of See also:Cilicia, are nomadic Turkoman tribes called by the Turks Yiiriik or Gyochebe. They are even found near See also:Smyrna. They are a peaceful race, with See also:fair complexions and a See also:fine physique, and are great See also:camel breeders. Though they do not appear to have a religion of their own like the Kizil Bash, they are only nominally Mahommedans. Besides the peoples mentioned above, a number of See also:extinct tribes may have been Turkish-speaking, though in the See also:absence of linguisticrecords no certain conclusion is possible. Such are the Huns See also:Ephthalites, Avars, Bulgars, See also:Khazars, Comans and Petchenegs. The name Hun is perhaps identical with the Chinese Hiung-nu or with the Turkish word for ten, on or un, meaning the ten tribes. Of the Avars really nothing is known: they were an extremely barbarous people who made no settlements and disappeared as suddenly as they came. They have been identified with the Jwen-Jwen of the Chinese. The name of the Khazars has a Turkish See also:sound : they were a relatively civilized people and had a kingdom in the neighbourhood of Astrakhan and the north Caspian which lasted for several centuries. The original Bulgarians were certainly not Slays, though they acquired a See also:Slavonic language, but it is more probable that they were Finno-Ugrians than Turks. The Petchenegs, also called Ilae;-tviLCai or IZari'See also:Lea/cLTat in See also:Greek and Bisseni in Latin, are said to have been driven into Europe from the lower Ural by the Ghuzz (Oul'oi) at the end of the 9th century, and wandered about the northern frontiers of the Byzantine Empire for about 300 years. Perhaps some of them settled in See also:Hungary and Bulgaria. They were, like the Avars, very barbarous and were probably Turks, for See also:Anna Comnena says they spoke the same language as the Comans. This dialect is known by the so-called Codex Cumanicus. Coman or Kuman is a name given by Europeans to the tribes who occupied See also:Moldavia and the adjacent regions in the middle ages. See also:Rubruquis speaks of the Coman Kipchaks, and it is probable that the Comans were a hybrid Turkish tribe. History.—The invasions and conquests of the later Turkish dynasties See also:form an important part of the history of the world and are treated in such articles as TURKEY; SELJUKS; TIMUR; MOGULS. Here it is proposed to See also:sketch the earlier wanderings and agglomerations (for they can hardly be called kingdoms) of Turkish tribes in eastern and central Asia. Much new in-formation on this subject has been made accessible in the last twenty years by the See also:discovery near the river Orkhon, to the south of See also:Lake See also:Baikal, of Turkish See also:inscriptions dating from the 8th century A.D., and by the publication of materials furnished by Chinese writers. But authorities are still not entirely agreed as to the See also:chronology of the events recorded or the identity of the names which appear in Turkish, Greek and Chinese forms, so that the following See also:summary is for many periods tentative. From 1400 B.C. onwards, but especially about 200 B.C., Chinese history contains notices of warlike nomads called Hiung-nu or Hsiung-nu, who were a danger to the empire. Their political power See also:broke up in the early centuries of this era before the advance of the Sien-pi and Tobas, who appear to have been Tunguses, and from whom arose the Wei dynasty of northern China. In A.D. 433 a Hiung-nu clan called Asena or A-shih-na, disliking the See also:rule of the Wei, moved eastwards and sought the See also:protection of a people called Jeu-Jen or Jwen-Jwen, who were also a kind of Hiung-nu. They are the Geougen of See also:Gibbon and others, and their identity with the Avars has been affirmed and disputed with equal confidence. The Asena served the Jwen-Jwen as workers in See also:iron and lived not far from the modern See also:city of Shan-Tan in Kan-suh. In this neighbourhood was a See also: The period 546-582 marks the first brilliant See also:epoch of early Turkish history. The tribes were not divided and made the most astonishing advance under Tumen (who took the See also:title of Ili-Khan), his See also:brother Itsami or She-ti-mi (perhaps the Stembis of Greek writers), his son Mokan and Istami's son Tardu or Ta-t'eu. Though fifty years before only a servile clan in China, they sent an See also:embassy in 567 to the East See also:Roman emperor See also:Justin II., as related by See also:Menander See also:Protector (C. See also: But their conquests, or at least their successful raids, extended very much farther to the west and south. In 63o the Chinese See also:pilgrim Yuan Chwang (Hsuan Tsang) was well received by their khan, T'ung-she-ho, who exercised some kind of authority from Turfan to See also:Merv. The Chinese followed a consistent policy of spreading dissension among these dangerous tribes and of supporting the factions which were weak or distant against those who were strong or near. Accordingly they were friendly to the western Turks until they had conquered the northern Turks. This western branch lasted until about 750 as a political name. From about 55o till 65o they were See also:independent, and, as mentioned, See also:allies of the east Roman Empire against the Persians. But about 65o the politics of the Nearer East were transformed by the conquests of the Arabs following on the See also:preaching of See also:Mahomet. After subduing Persia in 639 they spread to Transoxiana. At the same time dissension prevailed among the western Turks themselves: the five tribes called Nu-she-pi, who lived west of Issyk-kul, quarrelled with the five tribes called Tu-lu living to the east of it. The Chinese fomented the See also:quarrel, and in 659 were able to declare that they annexed the whole territory of the western Turks, including at least Dzungaria, Tashkent, Ferghana, Bokhara, Khulm, See also:Badakshan, See also:Ghazni, See also:Bamian, Udyana, Wakhan and See also:Karateghin. But it would seem that neither the Turkish occupation nor the Chinese See also:annexation of most of these countries was effectivd. From 65o to 750 the See also:possession of them was disputed not only by the Turks and Chinese but by the Tibetans in the east and the Arabs in the west. In the west, the campaigns of Qotaiba b. Moslim or Kutaiba (705—14) completed the Mahommedan See also:conquest of Transoxiana (see See also:CALIPHATE, See also:sect. B § 6). In the east the really effective power seems to have been exercised by a new Turkish tribe called Turgash, who had capitals at Tokmak and in Ili. For the history of the northern Turks' our only authorities are the Orkhon inscriptions and Chinese writers. The half-century following on the division was prosperous for the north-ern as well as for the western Turks, and they menaced China; but in .63o the Chinese conquered them. This is the Chinese See also:servitude mentioned in the inscriptions. In 682 Kutluk (also called Elteres, which seems to be a title) re-established a Turkish See also:state on the Orkhon. He was succeeded by his brother Kapagan (or Me-Chuo), who subdued the Turgash, or perhaps merely drove them southwards, early in the 8th century, and was succeeded by Bilga Kagan of the inscriptions. This northern khanate was destroyed by a See also:coalition of the Karluk, See also:Uighur and Basmal in 744. These peoples, like the Turgash, appear to have been Turkish; for though Turk was originally the name of the clan whose destinies in its northern and western branches have just' been sketched, yet there is no objection to the usage by which it is extended to the descendants 1 No better name seems forthcoming, but western Turks is a most inconvenient designation because It Is also used (and equally correctly) to signify the Osmanlis and Seljuks as opposed to the Turks of Transoxiana and Kashgar.of similar clans with similar customs and as far as is known similar languages. A See also:succession of these pressed forwards from the east. When first heard of, the Karluk inhabited the country on the Irtysh and the Urungu, and subsequently occupied Teles and Tokmak. The Uighurs belonged to the group of tribes known as Tdlds or T'ie-le and established themselves at Balasaghun (also known by the forms Kara-Balghasun, Kara-Balgassun and Balagasun: see See also:KARAKORUM). This brings us to the middle of the 8th century. For the next two See also:hundred years the Turkish See also:element in Central Asia, though it must have been numerous, does not cut any figure in history, which is filled with the See also:chronicles of Arab and Persian dynasties (see CALIPHATE; See also:SAMANIDS), but in the loth century we begin to hear of it again. Turkish adventurers founded the dynasty of Ghaznevids at Ghazni, and there was a Uighur kingdom in the east comprising Kashgar and Khotan. Boghra Khan, the ruler of this kingdom, was converted to See also:Islam at the end of the loth century, and it continued under various branches of Uighurs until 1120. An interesting memorial of this period is the book Kudatku Bilik (see below). More important politically is the rise of the Seljuks. They were the princely See also:family of the Kabaks, who were a See also:section of the group of tribes called Ghuzz (Oghuz, 0k m), and are heard of in Transoxiana about 985. Their chieftains Toghrul and Chakir drove the Ghaznevids to India and established themselves as protectors of the Abbasid See also:caliph, who formally ceded his temporal power to them. (For the history of the dynasty see SELJUKS.) See also:Alp Arslan, the son of Chakir, defeated the Byzantines at Manzikert (1071), and prepared the way for the Ottoman conquests. His son Malik Shah ruled over nearly all the modern Turkey in Asia, and as far as the frontiers of China. On his See also:death in 1092 his empire broke up into several pieces. See also:Konia became the capital of the sultanate of Asia Minor and various Seljuk dynasties established themselves in See also:Kerman, See also:Irak and See also:Syria. A new Turkish power was founded by the khans of Khiva, who are known as the Khwarizm-shahs. They were originally vassals of the Seljuks, with the title of tasdar or ewer-See also:bearer, but became independent and conquered Khorasan and Irak. They had, however, to contend with yet another new arrival from the east, the Kara-Kitais. These also were probably Turks, and were pushed westwards from' China by the Kins. They conquered Kashgar, Khotan, Yarkand and later Transoxiana, pushing the Ghuzz tribes before them into Persia and See also:Afghanistan. Their See also:prince See also:bore the title of gur-khan, and the Khwarizm shahs did See also:homage to him till 1208, when they unsuccessfully revolted. But all these squabbling principalities were swept away in 1219 by the extraordinary See also:wave of invasion which surged across Asia to Europe under Jenghiz Khan (q.v.). After the death of Jenghiz his conquests were divided, and Transoxiana, Kashgar, Badakshan, See also:Balkh and Ghazni were given to his second son Chagatai or Jagatai. Jenghiz and his family must have been Mongols, but the name Jagatai passed to the population and language of the countries about the Oxus. It does not appear that they ever ceased to be Turkish in speech and customs. The hordes of Jenghiz must have comprised a considerable Turkish element; the Mongols had no inclination to settle in cities, and Jagatai himself lived near See also:Kulja in the extreme east of his dominions. Though the cities in western Central Asia suffered severely the people were not Mongolized, and Mahommedan learning even flourished. But otherwise the whole history of the Jagatai khanate, which lasted from 1234 to 1370, is a See also:con-fused See also:record of dissensions with frequent intervals of anarchy. In 1321 it split into two khanates, Transoxiana and Dzungaria, and in 1370 collapsed before Timur. This great conqueror (1333—1404), who like Jenghiz had an extraordinary power of See also:collecting and leading the hordes of Central Asia, was a native of the See also:district of Samarkand and a Turk by descent. He conquered successively Dzungaria (1370), Persia and the Caucasus (1390), the Kipchaks on the Volga (1395), and Northern India (1398). He then invaded Syria and Asia Minor, where he defeated but did not annihilate the Osmanlis. The See also:house of Timur did not retain his more distant conquests, but they ruled at Samarkand until 1499 with the usual struggles between different branches of the family. Their possessions included, at least from time to time, the northern parts of Afghanistan and Persia, as well as Transoxiana and See also:Turkestan. They were one of the most enlightened and cultivated of Turkish dynasties. They beautified the cities of Central Asia and were patrcns of literature. The See also:literary languages were as a rule Arabic or Persian; Turkish was used more rarely and chiefly for See also:poetry. The Timurids were overthrown and succeeded by the Shaibani dynasty, a branch of the house of Juji, Jenghiz Khan's eldest son, to whom his See also:father had assigned dominions in the region north of the kingdom of Jagatai. About 1465 a number of this clan migrated into the Jagatai khanate. They were given territory on the Chu River and were known as Uzbegs. About 1500 their chief, Mahommed Shaibani or Shahi Beg, made himself See also:master of Transoxiana and founded the Uzbeg power. The chief opponent of the Uzbegs in their early days was Baber, who represented the house of Timur in the fifth See also:generation, but he ultimately led his armies in another direction and invaded India (1526), where he founded the Mogul Empire, a far more important state than the principalities of the Oxus. The Shaibanis continued to rule in these latter till 1583, and were followed by the houses of Astrakhan and Mangit; but it is not necessary to continue here the complicated chronicles of these dynasties. The Osmanlis, or house of Osman, the founders of the present Turkish Empire, appear to have been a clan similar to the early Seljuks or the present Turkomans of Transcaspia, who migrated into Asia Minor from Khorasan and made the neighbourhood of Brusa their headquarters. Their conspicuous position in history is mainly due to the fact that they attained pre-See also:eminence very See also:late and in districts very near Europe. Except for the invasion of Timur they did not suffer from the attacks of other Turks and they were able to concentrate their strength on the conquest of the decrepit Byzantine Empire. Customs, See also:Civilization, Religion, &c.—The Turks are imitative rather than original, and, in all their branches, have assimilated to some extent the nearest civilization whenever they have settled down. Up to the 7th century their only culture consisted of some scraps of Chinese and Indian civilization. Subsequently both the eastern and western states which they founded adopted Perso-Arabic civilization and Mahommedanism. The Osmanlis have also been affected by Byzantine and west European influences. Chinese historians and the Turkish inscriptions of the Orkhon and Yenisei give us a good deal of See also:information respecting the earlier condition of these tribes. We are told that the Hiung-nu lived on horseback and moved about from place to place in See also:search of fresh pasture. They possessed horses, See also:cattle and See also:sheep and also camels. They had no towns or villages and no See also:agriculture and they never stayed See also:long in one See also:camp, but during their halts a See also:special piece of See also:land was assigned to each tribe and each See also:tent. They were ignorant of See also:writing. The children were taught to ride and shoot, and the adults were See also:expert archers. Their See also:food was flesh and milk and their clothing the skins of animals. They were polygamous and a son married his deceased father's wives, except his own See also:mother. It is expressly stated that old people were despised and neglected, but this barbarous trait disappeared from the manners of the later Turks. Of the Turks in the 6th century the Chinese writers give a rather more flattering See also:account. They had numerous grades of See also:rank, and when their khan was invested with the supreme power he was carried in a See also:carpet. When troops were levied or taxes collected, the required amount was carved on a piece of See also:wood marked with a golden arrow as a sign of authority. Their punishments were severe. See also:Marriage was by arrangement with the parents, not See also:capture. The dead were kept for some time after death and the mourners gashed their faces. They sacrificed to See also:heaven and to the See also:spirits of their ancestors. Their amusements included singing antiphonally, playing See also:dice and drinking koumiss till they were drunk. They had a written alphabet (derived from India or Syria) and a duodenary See also:cycle in which the years were designated by the names of animals. Somewhat similar accounts are given of the Kerkur or Kirghiz and of the Kankli or Kankali. These were perhaps the ancestors of the Uighurs and moved about in carts with high wheels: they are described as a barbarous undisciplined people, but capable of concerted See also:action. In the Orkhon inscriptions of the early part of the 8th century a somewhat more civilized branch of the Turks gives an account of itself which tallies with the Chinese descriptions. No Turkish cities are mentioned, only tribes and localities. See also:War is the national occupation. The See also:sovereign or kagan fights himself, and it is interesting to see that the names of the various chargers which he mounted are carefully recorded. The spirit of tribal patriotism and desirefor See also:glory which animate these compositions are very noticeable and also the implied See also:obligation of the rulers to see to the prosperity of the people. The existence of the tombs and of inscriptions in Chinese characters as well as in an alphabet of Aramaic origin, and the mention of See also:gold, See also:silver, silk and See also:precious objects show that the builders had looted, so to speak, a certain amount of fragmentary civilization from their neighbours. The chief deity is Heaven or 'Magri (still used in Osmanli Turkish as the See also:equivalent of See also:Allah), who gives the kingdom to the kagans and cares for the name and reputation of the Turkish people. There are also spirits of the See also:earth and See also:waters. All this is very like the earliest Chinese religion. Funeral ceremonies were evidently elaborate and the cycle of years named after animals was used for chronology. The Chinese pilgrim Hiisan Tsang was entertained by She-hu (perhaps a title), kagan of the Western Turks, near Tokmak about A.D. 630. He left an account of the barbaric splendour of his reception and alludes to the number of horses, the gold See also:embroidery of the kagan's tent, the silk See also:robes of his See also:retinue, and the use of See also:wine and See also:music. He says the Turks were fire-worshippers and would not sit on wooden seats. It is probable that before they were converted to Islam the Turks practised in a desultory manner Buddhism, fire-worship and Nestorian Christianity, though they never wholly accepted any of them. An interesting trace of Buddhism remains in the names Shaman and See also:Shamanism. It would appear that the Indian word ramana or Samana was applied to the wizards and exorcizers of the older Turkish superstition. See also:Recent investigations have discovered the existence of a considerable Buddhist civilization at Khotan, but at the time when it flourished it would appear that the See also:mass of the population was of Iranian See also:affinities and that the Turkish element was small. The Kudatku Bilik (about 1065) gives a picture of life in Easte.n Turkestan after the See also:conversion to Islam, but still showing many traces of Chinese influence. But after this period nearly all the Turks (except a few obscure tribes like the Yakuts) adopted the Perso-Arabic civilization. Some however, such as the Kirghiz, Turkomans and Yuruks of Asia Minor, have not yet abandoned the nomadic life. The Turks seem to be everywhere characterized by their innate sense of discipline and their submissiveness to their own authorities; See also:councils or assemblies have rarely assumed importance among them; sovereigns and even dynasties (except the house of Osman) have often been removed by violence, but.the despotic form of government has never failed to secure obedience. But equally important, as explaining their military successes, is the fact, noticed alike by ancient Chinese historians and modern European officers, that the ordinary Turkish soldier has in military matters an unusual resourcefulness and power of initiative which, without impairing discipline, renders him independent of his officers. Language.—The Turkish or Tatar-Turkish languages belong to the Ural-Altaic family. Both nominal and verbal forms are built up solely by the addition of suffixes, and the See also:law of vowel See also:harmony is strictly observed. Hard and soft vowels cannot occur in the same word, and there is a tendency to assimilate the vowels of the suffix to those of the See also:root; thus pederiniz, your father, but dostunuz, your friend. From the Mongol-Manchu languages the Turkish group is distinguished by its much more See also:developed See also:system of See also:inflexion, particularly in the verbs, by its See also:free use of pronominal suffixes, and by its more thoroughly agglutinative See also:character. The See also:stem with its suffixes forms a single See also:compound word, whereas in Mongol the suffixes often seem quasi-independent. In all these features Turkish resembles the Finno-Ugric languages, but it diverges from them in having a much simpler system of cases and different See also:phonetics, in the absence of many peculiarities such as the See also:incorporation of the pronominal object in the verb, and in the development of some special forms, such as the expression of negation by inserting a suffix after t 1b verbal root (yazdim, I wrote, yazenadim, I did not write). The grammatical forms are more agglutinative and less inflexional than in Finnish; though they are single words, the root does not See also:change and the elements can be easily separated, which is not always the See also:case in Finnish. Compare the Turkish gyordiiniiz, " you saw," from the root gyiir, with the equivalent Finnish nditte from nake. The See also:fusion between the root and suffixes is much more thorough in the latter. Turkish thus stands midway between Mongol and Finnish in its development of the agglutinative principle. Also, though compounds are not unknown in Turkish (e.g. demiryol, railway) they are much rarer than in Finnish or Hungarian. Despite the apparent divergence between Turkish and Mongol, due perhaps partly to the influence of Chinese on the latter, the See also:affinity between them seems real, though not superficial. The pronouns, case suffixes, and construction of sentences all show a See also:general similarity, and the verb in Buriat, which differs from other Mongol languages, exhibits a development parallel to Turkish. The want of resemblance in vocabulary between the three classes of languages is remarkable. The numerals, for instance, in Turkish, Mongol and Finno-Ugric are entirely different, and considerable changes have to be assumed before the identity of words can be proved. A comparison of Turkish words with Mongol equivalents makes it probable that the former are in many instances contractions: thus dagh, See also:mountain, yol, road, correspond to the Mongol dabaga, yabudal and perhaps represent an earlier tavagh and yavol. The best-known Turkish languages, particularly Osmanli, have borrowed an enormous number of Arabic and Persian words which disguise the characters of the native vocabulary and to some extent affect the See also:grammar. Compared with the Finno-Ugric group, the Turkish languages are remarkably See also:uniform. Indeed, allowing for the See also:lapse of time and the importation of See also:foreign words, it is hardly an exaggeration to say that from the Lena to Constantinople, from the Orkhon inscriptions till now, we have merely one language in different dialects. The native vocabulary and grammar remain substantially the same. The linguistic type is evidently strongly individual and persistent, and its separation from Mongol, &c., is probably very ancient. Radlov divides the Turkish languages or dialects into four See also:groups, according to their phonetic system. (i) Eastern: Altai, Baraba, Lebed, See also:Tuba, Abakan, Kiiarik, Soyon, Karagass and Uighur. (2) Western : Kirghiz, Bashkir, Irtysh and Volga dialects. (3) Central Asiatic: Jagatai, Taranji, &c. (4) Southern: Turkmani, Azerbaijani, Krimmi, Anadoli and Osmanli. But this See also:classification does not seem entirely satisfactory. As one passes across Asia from the Yakuts, through Kashgar, Turkestan and Azerbaijan to Constantinople, the See also:pronunciation of the Turkish languages becomes decidedly softer, the suffixes become more intimately See also:united with the words to which they are appended (approaching though not attaining the unity of Finnish inflexions), and the verbal forms grow more numerous and more complicated. Thus in the east we find nin, ni, ga as suffixes for the genitive, See also:accusative and See also:dative, and man for that of the first See also:personal pronoun (e.g. durman, I stand or I am) corresponding to -in, -i, -a and -See also:im in Osmanli, which have clearly assumed the character of inseparable terminations more completely than the older forms. Osmanli possesses more copious verbal forms than the other dialects, some of which (such as the future in -ajak) seem to be recent formations. On the other See also:hand, the dialects of Turkestan use in speaking, though not in writing, forms which indicate a process of See also:composition followed by contraction, more remarkable than any change which has taken place in the west. For instance, wopti, a contraction of bolup irdi, is said to be currently used in See also:Khokand for " has become." See also:Yakut (which can still be best studied in See also:Bohtlingk's excellent grammar of 1851) is the dialect which is most distinct trom the others, but does not appear always to preserve the See also:oldest forms Thus it has lost the genitive, which is replaced by a pronominal periphrasis (e.g. See also:bras bas-a, horse See also:head-his, i.e. horse's head), and has verbal forms like bisabin, I cut, bispappin, I do not cut, apparently See also:standing for bisarbin, bispatbin. The negative suffix is pa not ma. The resemblance between the Turkish dialects is increased by the fact that they are nearly all written in a somewhat artificial and standardized form which imperfectly represents the variety existing in conversational speech. Several alphabets have been employed to write Turkish. (i) Arabic characters are everywhere used by Mahommedan Turks, almost without exception; yet this alphabet is extremely See also:ill suited to represent Tti-See also:kish sounds. It cannot distinguish the hard and soft vowels, so that oldu, " he was " is written in the same way as oldu, " he died." In some cases the consonants indicate the character of the vowels which are to be supplied after them, hard consonants being followed by hard vowels and soft by soft. Thus the word spelt with the letters kaf, re, he is pronounced as kara, but that spelt with See also:kef, re, he as kerre. Further the See also:orthography often follows an antiquated pronunciation and the letters have many sounds. Thus the single See also:letter kef can be used to See also:express k, ky, g, gy, y, v, w and n. The result is that pure Turkish words written in Arabic letters are often hardly intelligible even to Turks and it is usual to employ Arabic synonyms as much as possible because there is no doubt as to how they should be read. Osmanli documents are often little more than a See also:string of Arabic words with Turkish terminations. 2. The Uighurs and Eastern Turks used in the middle ages a See also:short alphabet of fourteen letters derived from a Syriac source and probably introduced among them by Nestorian missionaries; similar characters may also have been employed by Manichaeans. The Mongol and Manchu alphabets represent further See also:variations of this writing. Though very like the modern Nestorian, it is in some respects more nearly allied to the Estrangelo and Syro-Palestinian alphabets of the 6th and 7th centuries. The most importantdocument in this alphabet is a MS. preserved at Vienna of the Kudatku Bilik, " The Blessed or Fortunate Knowledge," a poem composed at Kashgar about 1065. A See also:colophon states that the MS. was written at Herat in 1465, and that it is a copy of one written in 1085. Inscriptions in a similar alphabet have also been found in China. 3. The most interesting forms of Turkish writing are those used on the inscriptions found in Siberia near the Yenisei and Orkhon See also:rivers. For some time it has been known that stones bearing inscriptions as well as roughly carved figures and See also:hunting scenes were to be tound on the upper waters of the Yenisei, particularly near its tributary the Abakan in the district of See also:Minusinsk. They are greatly venerated by the Soyotes inhabiting the region. They were first discovered by Messerschmidt in 1722, and some of them were represented in the plates of Strahlenberg's Das See also:nord. and ostliche Theil von See also:Europa and Asia (1730). They were generally attributed to Scythians or Chudes. The knowledge of them did not much advance until the researches of See also:Castren (1847) and the Finnish Society of See also:Archaeology, which in 1889 published the See also:text of See also:thirty-two, chiefly from the Uibat, Ulukem, Altynkul and Tes. Even more interesting are the monuments discovered in 1889 and known as the Orkhon or Kosho-See also:Tsaidam inscriptions, as they were found in See also:Mongolia to the south of Lake Baikal, between the river Orkhon and Lake Kosho-Tsaidam. The most important are a See also:mortuary inscription in Turkish and Chinese, bearing a date corresponding to 733, in honour of Kul-tegin, and another recounting the exploits of Bilga Kagan. A.third inscription at Kara-Balgassun probably See also:dates from 80o-805. The inscriptions were deciphered and translated by See also:Thomsen and Radlov, and Donner examined the origin of the alphabet. He came to the conclusion that the Yenisei alphabet is rather older than that of the Orkhon inscriptions, and that both are derived from the Aramaic alphabet and most nearly allied to the variety of it used on the coins of the Assacid dynasty. In the 3rd century A.D. a section of the Kirghiz, who subsequently moved northwards, were in West See also:Sogdiana and in See also:touch with the Yue-Chi, who had been for some time in contact with Persia. The old Turkish characters See also:bear a superficial resemblance to See also:runes; the Yenisei letters have the simplest shapes, those of Kara-Balgassun the most complicated. But they are mostly traceable to Aramaic prototypes and have no connexion with Scandinavia. The vowels are generally omitted, even at the beginning of words, and, as in the modern Turkish method of using the Arabic alphabet, their quality is often indicated by the consonants, many of which have two forms, one used with soft the other with hard vowels. Thus See also:bar and bar are differentiated not by the vowels but by the consonants employed to write them. 4. Turkish-speaking Armenians and Greeks often write it in their own alphabets. Turkish See also:newspapers printed in Armenian characters are published in Constantinople, and Greek characters are similarly employed in several parts of Asia Minor. BIBLIOGRAPHY: (a).—General See also:works on the history and ethnography of the Turks: Deguignes, Histoire See also:des Huns; See also:Vambery, Das Tiirkenvolk (See also:Leipzig, 1885), Unsprung der Magyaren (Leipzig, 1882), and several other publications; Radlov, Aus Sibirien (Leipzig, 1884) ; W. Grigoriev, Zemlewjedjenie K. Rittera Wostotschni ill Kitaiski Turkestan; See also:Neumann, See also:Die Volker des siidlichen Russland (Leipzig, 1847). We may add the historians of the Mongols—D'Ohsson, Howorth and others—the numerous See also:journals of travellers amongst Turkish peoples, and several articles in the Russische Revue; Journ. Royal Asiatic See also:Soc. ; Revue orientale pour See also:les etudes Ouralaltaiques, and other Oriental See also:periodicals; Skrine and See also:Ross, See also:Heart of Asia (1899); Cahun, Tura, ei Mongols (See also:Paris, 1896); E. H. See also:Parker. A Thousand Years of the Tartars (1895), and numerous articles, especially in the Asiatic Quarterly by the same author on Chinese accounts of these tribes; Chavannes, Les Tou-kiue occidentaux (St See also:Petersburg, 1903). b. For the study of Turkish dialects the subjoined books may be used. (1) Osmanli: the grammars, dictionaries and chrestomathies of See also:Wells (188o), A. Wahrmund (1884) and Redhouse (189o). (2) Uighur: the works of See also:Klaproth; See also:Abel See also:Remusat, Recherches sur les langues tatares (Paris, 182o) ; Vambery, Uigurische Sprachmonumente and das Kudatku Bilik (See also:Innsbruck, 1870), and a newer edition by W. Radlov (St Petersburg, 1900). (3) Jagatai: the See also:dictionary of Pavet de Courteille and Vambery, Jagataische Sprachstudien (Leipzig, 1867). (4) Eastern Turki: See also:Shaw's grammar and vocabulary (Journ. See also:Roy. As. Soc. of See also:Bengal, 1877). (5) Tatar dialects: the grammars of Kasimbeg-Zenker (Leipzig, 1848), Ilminski (Kazan, 1869) and Radlov (Leipzig, 1882); Dictionary of Trojanski (Kazan, 1833) ; the chrestomathies of Beresine (Kazan, 1857), Terentiev and specially Radlov, Proben der Volksliteratur der tiirkischen Stamme Siid-Sibiriens (St Petersburg, 1872). (6) Yakuti: Bohtlingk, Die Sprache der Jakuten (St Petersburg, 1851); Radlov, Yakutische Sprache in ihrem Verhaltniss zu den Turksprachen (1908). (7) Inscriptions: Societe finlandaise d'archeologie, Inscriptions de l'Ienisei and several works by O. Donner, W. Radlov and V. Thomsen —especially Thomsen, Inscriptions de l'Orkhon dechiffrees (Helsin - fors, 1896); Donner, Sur l'origine de l'alphabet turc (See also:Helsingfors; Radlov, Die alt-tiirkische Inschriften der Mongolei (St Petersburg, 1897) ; See also:Marquardt, Chronologie der alt-ti rkischen Inschriften (1898). (C. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] TURKOMAN |
[next] TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS |