Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:EXPERT (See also:Lat. expertus, from experiri, to try) , strictly, skilled, or one who has See also:special knowledge; as used in See also:law, an expert is a See also:person, selected by a See also:court, or adduced by a party to a cause, to give his See also:opinion on some point in issue with which he is peculiarly conversant. In See also:Roman law questions of disputed See also:handwriting were referred to experts; and in See also:France, whenever the court considers that a See also:report by experts is necessary, it is ordered by a See also:judgment clearly setting forth the See also:objects of the expertise (See also:Code Proc. Civ. See also:art. 302). Three experts are then to be appointed, unless the parties agree upon one only (art. 303). The experts are required to take an See also:oath (art. 305), but in practice this requirement is frequently dispensed with. They may be challenged on the same grounds as witnesses (art. 31o). The necessary documentary and other See also:evidence is laid before them (art. 317), and they make a single report to the court, even if they See also:express different opinions: in that See also:case the grounds only of the different opinions are to be stated, and not the See also:personal opinion of each of the experts (art. 318). If the court is not satisfied with the report, new experts may be appointed (art. 322); the See also:judges are not See also:bound to adopt the opinion of the experts (art. 323). " This See also:procedure in regard to experts is See also:common to both the See also:civil and commercial courts, but it is much more frequently resorted to in the commercial court than in the civil court, and the investigation is usually conducted by special experts officially attached to each of these courts " (Bodington, See also:French Law of Evidence, See also:London, 1904, p. 102).
A similar See also:system is to be found in force in many other See also:European countries; see e.g. Codes of Civil Procedure of See also: 286 et seq.). In See also:Mauritius the articles of the French law, summarized above, are still nominally in force; but in practice each See also:side calls its own expert evidence, as in See also:England.
There is some evidence that in England the courts were in See also:early times in the See also:habit of ; ummoning to their assistance, apparently as assessors, persons specially qualified to advise upon any scientific or technical question that required to be determined. Thus " in an See also:appeal of maihem (i.e. wounding) . . . the court did not know how to adjudge because the See also:wound was new, and then the See also:defendant took issue and prayed the court that the maihem might be examined, on which a See also:writ was sent to the See also:sheriff to cause to come medicos chirurgieos de melioribus London, ad informandum dominum regem et curiam de his quae cis ex parte domini rcgis injungerentur (See also:Year See also:Book, 21 See also:Hen. VII. pl. 30, p. 33)• The practice ,of calling in expert assistance in judicial inquiries was not confined to medico-legal cases. " If matters arise," said See also:Justice Saunders in Buckley v. See also:Rice See also: (i) An expert is permitted to refresh his memory in regard to any fact by referring to anything written by himself or under his direction at the See also:time when the fact occurred or at a time when it was fresh in his memory. This is also law generally in the See also:United States (see e.g. New See also:York Civil Code, s. 1843). In See also:Scotland, medical and other scientific reports are lodged in See also:process before the trial, and the witness reads them as See also:part of his evidence and is liable to be examined or See also:cross-examined on their contents. (2) In strictness, an expert will not be allowed, in cases of alleged See also:insanity, to say that a litigating or incriminated party is insane or the See also:reverse, and so to usurp the See also:prerogative of the court or See also:jury. But he may be asked whether certain facts or symptoms, assuming them to be proved, are or are not indicative of insanity. But in practice this See also:rule is relaxed both in England and in Scotland, and (where it exists) to a still greater extent in See also:America. (3) See also:Foreign law can only be proved in English courts— and the same rule applies in Scotland—(a) by obtaining an opinion on the subject from a See also:superior court of the See also:country whose See also:laws are in dispute under the Foreign Law Ascertainment See also:Act 1861 or the See also:British Law Ascertainment Act 1859, or (b) by the evidence of a lawyer of the country whose law is in question, or who has studied it in that country, or of an See also:official whose position requires, and therefore presumes, a sufficient knowledge of that law. (4) The See also:weight of authority both in England and in America supports the view that an expert is not bound to give evidence as to matters of opinion unless upon an undertaking by the party calling him to pay a reasonable remuneration for his evidence. Statutory See also:provision has beei made in England for the summoning of expert assistance by the legal tribunals in various cases. In the See also:county courts the See also:judge may, if he thinks See also:fit, on the application of either party, See also:call in as See also:assessor one or more persons of skill and experience as to the matters in dispute (County Courts Act 1888, s. 103), and special provision is made for calling in an assessor in employers' liability cases (act of r88o, s. 6) and See also:admiralty matters (see County Courts Admiralty See also:Jurisdiction Acts of 1868 and 1869). In the High Court and court of appeal one or more specially qualified assessors may be called in to assist in the See also:hearing of any cause or See also:matter except a criminal proceeding by the See also:crown (Judicature Acts 1873, s. 56), and a like See also:power is given to both these courts and the judicial See also:committee of the privy See also:council in patent cases (See also:Patents, &c., Act1883, s. 28). Maritime causes, whether See also:original or on appeal from county courts, are usually taken in the presence of See also:Elder Brethren of the Trinity See also:House, who advise the judge without having any right to See also:control or any responsibility for his decision (see the "See also:Beryl," 1884, q P.D. I), and on appeal in maritime causes nautical assessories are usually called in by the court of appeal, and may be called in by the House of Lords (Judicature Act 1891, s. 3); a like provision is made as to maritime causes in Scottish courts (Nautical Assessors [Scotland] Act 1894). The judicial committee of the privy council, besides its power to call in assessors in patent cases, is authorized to call them in in ecclesiastical causes (Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876, s. 14).
In addition to the authorities cited in the See also:text, see See also: See also:Lawson, Law of Expert and Opinion Evidence (1900). Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] EXPERIMENTS WITH DIRIGIBLE |
[next] EXPLOSION |