Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

CONQUEST

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V09, Page 525 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

CONQUEST (600-1o66) With the coming of See also:

Augustine to See also:Kent the darkness which for nearly two centuries had enwrapped the See also:history of See also:Britain begins to clear away. From the days of See also:Honorius to those of See also:Gregory the See also:Great the See also:line of See also:vision of the See also:annalists of the See also:continent was bounded by the Channel. As to what was going on beyond it, we have but a few casual gleams of See also:light, just enough to make the darkness visible, from writers such as the author of the See also:life of St Germanus, Prosper Tiro, See also:Procopius, and Gregory of See also:Tours. These notices do not, for the most See also:part, square particularly well with the fragmentary See also:British narrative that can be patched together from See also:Gildas's " lamentable See also:book," or the confused See also:story of See also:Nennius. Nor again do these British See also:sources ANGLO-SAXON BRITAIN 597-$25 uOau'a1e See also:English See also:Miles ash. [0. 50 See also:fit in happily with the English See also:annals constructed See also:long centuries after by See also:King See also:Alfred's See also:scribes in the first edition of the Anglo-Saxon See also:Chronicle. But from the date when the long-lost communication between Britain and See also:Rome was once more resumed, the history of the See also:island becomes clear and fairly continuous. The gaps are neither broader nor more obscure than those which may be found in the contemporary annals of the other kingdoms of See also:Europe. The stream of history in this See also:period is narrow and turbid throughout the See also:West. Quite as much is known of the doings of the English as of those of the Visigoths of See also:Spain, the See also:Lombards, or the later See also:Merovingians. The 7th See also:century was the darkest of all the " dark ages," and See also:England is particularly fortunate in possessing the Ecclesiastica historia of See also:Bede, which, though its author was primarily interested in things religious, yet contains a copious chronicle of things See also:secular.

No Western author, since the See also:

death of Gregory of Tours, wrote on such a See also:scale, or with such vigour and insight. English Territory in 597 Territory oonquered 597.825 See also:Celtic Territory in 825- _f+::`%L Territory partly occupied but lost again before 825.. 111. denote. annexed to See also:Hernia N.B.- The small names Wessex & Heroic refer to 597, the large names to 825 The See also:conversion of England to See also:Christianity took, from first to last, some ninety years (A.D. S97 to 686), though during the last See also:thirty the ancestral heathenism was only lingering on convey- s;onof in remote corners of the See also:land. The See also:original missionary England impulse came from Rome, and Augustine is rightly regarded as the evangelist of the English; yet only a comparatively small part of the nation owed its Christianity directly to the See also:mission sent out by See also:Pope Gregory. Wessex was won over by an See also:independent adventurer, the See also:Frank Birinus, who had no connexion with the earlier arrivals in Kent. The great See also:kingdom of See also:Northumbria, though its first See also:Christian monarch See also:Edwin was converted by See also:Paulinus, a See also:disciple of Augustine, re-lapsed into heathenism after his death. It was finally evangelized from quite another See also:quarter, by Irish missionaries brought by King See also:Oswald from See also:Columba's monastery of See also:Iona. The See also:church that they founded struck See also:root, as that of Paulinus and Edwin had failed to do, and was not wrecked even by Oswald's dea*.n in See also:battle at the hands of See also:Penda the Mercian, the one strong See also:champion of heathenism that England produced. Moreover, Penda was no sooner dead, smitten down by Oswald's See also:brother See also:Oswio at the battle of the Winwaed (A.D. 655), than his whole kingdom eagerly accepted Christianity, and received missionaries, Irish and Northumbrian, from the victorious Oswio. It is clear that, unlike their king, the Mercians had no profound See also:enthusiasm for the old gods.

See also:

Essex, which had received its first See also:bishop from Augustine's hands but had relapsed into heathenism after a few years, also owed its ultimate conversion to a Northumbrian preacher, Cedd, whom Oswio See also:lent to King Sigeberht after the latter had visited his See also:court and been baptized, hard by the See also:Roman See also:wall, in 653. Yet even in those English regions where the missionaries from Iona were the founders of the Church, the representatives of Rome were to be its organizers. In 664 the Northumbrian king Oswio, at the See also:synod of See also:Whitby, declared his See also:adhesion to the Roman connexion, whether it was that he saw See also:political See also:advantage therein, or whether he realized the failings and weaknesses of the Celtic church, and preferred the more orderly methods of her See also:rival. Five years later there arrived from Rome the great organizer, See also:Archbishop See also:Theodore of See also:Tarsus, who See also:bound the hitherto isolated churches of the English kingdoms into a well-compacted whole, wherein the tribal bishops paid obedience to the See also:metropolitan at See also:Canterbury, and met him frequently in See also:national See also:councils and synods. England gained a spiritual unity long ere she attained a political unity, for in these meetings, which were often attended by See also:kings as well as by prelates, Northumbrian, West Saxon and Mercian first learnt to See also:work together as See also:brothers. In a few years the English church became the See also:pride of Western Christendom. Not merely did it produce the great See also:band of missionaries who converted See also:heathen Germany—Willi- The h brord, Suidbert, See also:Boniface and the rest—but it excelled churc& the other national churches in learning and culture. It is but necessary to mention Bede and See also:Alcuin. The first, as has been already said, was the one true historian who wrote during the dark See also:time of the 7th-8th centuries; the second became the pride of the court of See also:Charles the Great for his unrivalled scholarship. At the coming of Augustine England had been a barbarous See also:country; a century and a See also:half later she was more than abreast of the See also:civilization of the See also:rest of Europe. But the progress toward national unity was still a slow one. The period when the English kingdoms began to enter into the See also:commonwealth of Christendom, by receiving the missionaries sent out from Rome or from Iona, practically coincides with the period in which the occupation of central Britain was completed, and the kingdoms of the conquerors assumed their final See also:size and shape.

'Ethel-See also:

frith, the last heathen among the Northumbrian kings, cut off the Britons of the See also:North from those of the West, by winning the battle of See also:Chester (A.D. 613), and occupying the land about the mouths of the See also:Mersey and the See also:Dee. Cenwalh, the last monarch who ascended the See also:throne of Wessex unbaptized, carried the boundaries of that kingdom into See also:Mid-See also:Somersetshire, where they halted for a long space. Penda, the last heathen king of See also:Mercia,determined the size and strength of that See also:state, by absorbing into it the territories of the other Anglian kingdoms of the Midlands, and probably also by carrying forward its western border beyond the See also:Severn. By the time when the smallest and most barbarous of the Saxon states—Sussex—accepted Christianity in the See also:year 686, the political See also:geography of England had reached a See also:stage from which it was not to vary in any marked degree for some 200 years. Indeed, there was nothing accomplished in the way of further encroachment on the See also:Celt after 686, See also:save See also:Ine's and Cuthred's See also:extension of Wessex into the valleys of the See also:Tone and the Exe, and See also:Offa's slight expansion of the Mercian frontier beyond the Severn, marked by his famous dyke. The conquests of the Northumbrian kings in Cumbria were ephemeral; what Oswio won was lost after the death of See also:Ecgfrith. That the conversion of the English to Christianity had any-thing to do with their slackening from the work of conquest it would be wrong to assert. Though their See also:wars with the Welsh were not conducted with such ferocious See also:cruelty as of old, and though (as the See also:laws of Ine show) the Celtic inhabitants of newly-won districts were no longer exterminated, but received as the king's subjects, yet the hatred between Welsh and English did not cease because both were now Christians. The westward advance of the invaders would have continued, if only there had remained to attract them lands as desirable as those they had already won. But the mountains of See also:Wales and the See also:moors of See also:Cornwall and Cumbria did not greatly tempt the settler. More-over, the English states, which had seldom turned their swords against each other in the 5th or the 6th centuries, were engaged during the 7th and the 8th in those endless struggles for supremacy which seem so purposeless, because the See also:hegemony which a king of See also:energy and See also:genius won for his kingdom always disappeared with his death.

The " Bretwaldaship," as The „Bret. the English seem to have called it, was the most waldas.” ephemeral of dignities. This was but natural: See also:

con- quest can only be enforced by the extermination of the conquered, or by their consent to amalgamate with the conquerors, or by the garrisoning of the land that has been subdued by settlers or by military posts. None of these courses were possible to a king of the 7th or 8th centuries: even in their heathen days the English were not wont to See also:massacre their beaten kinsmen as they massacred the unfortunate Celt. After their conversion to Christianity the See also:idea of exterminating other English tribes See also:grew even more impossible. On the other See also:hand, See also:local particularism was so strong that the conquered would not, at first, consent to give up their natural See also:independence and See also:merge themselves in the victors. Such amalgamations became possible after a time, when many of the local royal lines died out, and unifying influences, of which a See also:common Christianity was the most powerful, sapped the strength of tribal pride. But it is not till the 9th century that we find this phenomenon growing See also:general. A kingdom like Kent or See also:East Anglia, even after long subjection to a powerful overlord, See also:rose and reasserted its independence immediately on See also:hearing of his death. His successor had to See also:attempt a new conquest, if he See also:felt himself strong enough. To See also:garrison a See also:district that had been overrun was impossible: the military force of an English king consisted of his military See also:house-hold of gesiths, backed by the general See also:levy of the tribe. The strength of Mercia or Northumbria might be mustered for a single battle, but could not See also:supply a See also:standing See also:army to hold down the vanquished. The victorious king had to be content with See also:tribute and obedience, which would cease when he died, or was beaten by a competitor for the position of See also:Bretwalda.

In the ceaseless strife between the old English kingdoms, therefore, it was the See also:

personality of the king which was the See also:main See also:factor in determining the hegemony of one state over another. If in the 7th century the successive great ofNer- acy Northumbrians—Edwin, Oswald, Oswio and Ecgfrith thumbria. —were reckoned the See also:chief monarchs of England, and exercised a widespread See also:influence over the See also:southern realms, yet each had to win his supremacy by his own See also:sword; and when Edwin and Oswald See also:fell before the See also:savage heathen Penda, and Ecgfrith was cut off by the Picts, there was a See also:gap of anarchy Formation of the kingdoms. before another king asserted his See also:superior See also:power. The same phenomenon was seen with regard to the Mercian kings of the 8th century; the long reigns of the two conquerors ./See also:Ethelbald and Offa covered eighty years (716-796), and it might have been supposed that after such a See also:term of supremacy Mercia would have remained permanently at the See also:head of the English kingdoms. It was not so, iEthelbald in his old See also:age lost his hegemony at the battle of See also:Burford (752), and was murdered a few years after by his own See also:people. Off a had to win back by long wars what his kinsman had lost; he became so powerful that we find the pope calling him Rex Anglorum, as if he were the only king in the island. He annexed Kent and East Anglia, overawed Northumbria and Wessex, both hopelessly See also:faction-ridden at the time, was treated almost as an equal by the See also:emperor Charles the Great, and died still at the height of his power. Yet the moment that he was dead all his vassals revolted; his successors could never recover all that was lost. Kent once more became a kingdom, and two successive Mercian sovereigns, Beornwulf and Ludica, fell in battle while vainly trying to recover Offa's supremacy over East Anglia and Wessex. The ablest king in England in the See also:generation that followed Off a was See also:Ecgbert of Wessex, who had long been an See also:exile abroad, and served for thirteen years as one of the captains of suprem- Charles the Great. He See also:beat Beornwulf of Mercia at acy of Wessex.

Ellandune (A.D. 823), permanently annexed Kent, to whose See also:

crown he had a claim by descent, in 829 received the See also:homage of all the other English kings, and was for the See also:remainder of his life reckoned as " Bretwalda." But it is wrong to See also:call him, as some have done, " the first monarch of all England." His power was no greater than that of Oswio or Offa had been, and the supremacy might perhaps have tarried with Wessex no longer than it had tarried with Northumbria or Mercia if it had not chanced that the Danish raids were now beginning, For these 'invasions, paradoxical as it may seem, were the greatest efficient cause in the See also:welding together of England. They seemed about to rend the land in See also:twain, but they really cured the English of their desperate particularism, and drove all the tribes to take as their common rulers the one great line of native kings which survived the Danish See also:storm, and maintained itself for four generations cf desperate fighting against the invaders. On the continent the main effect of the See also:viking invasions was to dash the See also:empire of Charles the Great into fragments, and to aid in producing the numberless See also:petty states of feudal Europe. In this island they did much to help the transformation of. the See also:mere Bretwaldaship of Ecgbert into the See also:monarchy of all England. Already ere Ecgbert ascended the throne of Kent the new enemy had made his first tentative See also:appearance on the British See also:shore. It was in the reign of Beorhtric, Ecgbert's predecessor, that the pirates of the famous " three See also:ships from Heretheland " had appeared on the See also:coast of See also:Dorset, and slain the See also:sheriff " who would See also:fain have known what manner of men they might be." A few years later another band appeared, rising unexpectedly from the See also:sea to See also:sack the famous Northumbrian monastery of Lindisfarne (793). After that their visits came fast and furious on the shore-line of every English kingdom, and by the end of Ecgbert's reign it was they, and not his former Welsh and Mercian enemies, who were the old monarch's main source of trouble. But he brought his Bretwaldaship to a See also:good end by inflicting a crushing defeat on them at Hingston Down, hard by the Tamar, probably in 836, and died ere the year was out, leaving the ever-growing problem to his son AEthelwulf The cause of the sudden outpouring of the Scandinavian See also:deluge upon the lands of Christendom at this particular date is one of the puzzles of history. So far as memory ran, influence the peoples beyond the North Sea had been seafaring of viking sea powwer. races addicted to piracy. Even See also:Tacitus mentions sea=p their fleets. Yet since the 5th century they had been restricting their operations to their own shores, and are barely heard of in the See also:chronicles of their southern neighbours.

It seems most probable that the actual cause of their sudden activitywas the conquest of the See also:

Saxons by Charles the Great, and his subsequent advance into the See also:peninsula of See also:Denmark. The emperor seemed to be threatening the independence of the North, and in terror and resentment the Scandinavian peoples turned first to strike at the encroaching Frank, and soon after to assail the other Christian kingdoms which See also:lay behind, or on the flank of, the Empire. But their offensive See also:action proved so successful and so profitable that, after a See also:short time, the whole manhood of Denmark and See also:Norway took to the pirate life. Never since history first began to be recorded was there such a supreme example of the potentialities of sea-power. Civilized Europe had been caught at a moment when it was completely destitute of a See also:war-See also:navy; the See also:Franks had never been maritime in their tastes, the English seemed to have forgotten their See also:ancient sea-faring habits. Though their ancestors had been pirates as fierce as the vikings of the 9th century, and though some of their later kings had led See also:naval armaments—Edwin had annexed for a moment See also:Man and .Anglesea, and Ecgfrith had cruelly ravaged part of Ireland—yet by the year Boo they appear to have ceased to be a seafaring See also:race. Perhaps the long predominance of Mercia, an essentially inland state, had something to do with the fact. At any See also:rate England was as helpless as the Empire when first the Danish and See also:Norwegian galleys began to See also:cross the North Sea, and to beat down both sides of Britain seeking for See also:prey. The number of the invaders was not at first very great; their fleets were not national armaments gathered by great kings, but squadrons of a few vessels collected by some active and enterprising adventurer. Their original See also:tactics were merely to land suddenly near some thriving seaport, or See also:rich monastery, to sack it, and to take to the See also:water again before the local See also:militia could turn out in force against them. But such raids proved so profitable that the vikings soon began to take greater things in hand; they began to ally themselves in confederacies: two, six or a dozen " sea-kings" would join their forces for something more than a desultory See also:raid. With fifty or a See also:hundred ships they would fall upon some unhappy region, harry it for many miles inland, and offer battle to the landsfolk unless the latter came out in overpowering force.

And as their crews were trained warriors chosen for their high spirit, contending with a raw militia fresh from the plough, they were generally successful. If the odds' were too great they could always retire to their ships, put to sea, and resume their predatory operations on some other coast three hundred miles away. As long as their enemies were unprovided with a navy they were safe from pursuit and annihilation. The only See also:

chance against them was that, if caught too far from the See also:base-fort where they had run their galleys ashore, they might find their communication with the sea cut off, and be forced to fight for their lives surrounded by an infuriated countryside. But in the earlier years of their struggles with Christendom the vikings seldom suffered a See also:complete disaster; they were often beaten but seldom annihilated. Ere long they grew so bold that they would stay ashore for months, braving the forces of a whole kingdom, and sheltering themselves in great palisaded camps on peninsulas or islands when the enemy pressed them too hard. On well-guarded strongholds like See also:Thanet or See also:Sheppey in England, See also:Noirmoutier at the See also:Loire mouth, or the Isle of Walcheren, they defied the local magnates to evict them. Finally they took to wintering on the coast of England or the Empire, a preliminary to actual See also:settlement and conquest. (See VIKING.) King Ecgbert died long ere the invaders had reached this stage of insolence. IEthelwulf, his weak and kindly son, would undoubtedly have lost the titular supremacy of Wessex over the other English kingdoms if there had been in ofnan progress$ ish Mercia or Northumbria a strong king with leisure to conquest. concentrate his thoughts on domestic wars. But the vikings were now showering such blows on the See also:northern states that their unhappy monarchs could think of nothing but self-See also:defence. They slew Redulf—king of Northumbria—in 844, took See also:London in 851, despite all the efforts of See also:Burgred of Mercia, and forced that See also:sovereign to make repeated appeals for help to IEthelwulf as his overlord.

For though Wessex had its full See also:

share of Danish attacks it met them with a vigour that was not seen in Suprem- acy of Mercia. Danish invasions. the other realms. The defence was often, if not always, successful; and once at least (at AcIea in 851) ,See also:Ethelwulf exterminated a whole Danish army with " the greatest slaughter among the heathen See also:host that had been heard of down to that See also:day," as the Anglo-Saxon chronicler is careful to See also:record. But though he might See also:ward off blows from his own See also:realm, he was helpless to aid Mercia or East Anglia, and still more the distant Northumbria. It was not, however, till after sEthelwulf's death that the attack of the vikings See also:developed its full strength. The fifteen years (856-871) that were covered by the reigns of his three shortlived sons, ,Ethelbald, /Ethelbert and 'See also:Ethelred, were the most miserable that England was to see. Assembling in greater and ever greater confederacies, the Danes fell upon the northern kingdoms, no longer merely to harry but to conquer and occupy them. A See also:league of many sea-kings which called itself the " great army " slew the last two sovereigns of Northumbria and stormed See also:York in 867. Some of the victors settled down there to See also:lord it over the half-exterminated English See also:population. The rest continued their advance southward. East Anglia was conquered in 87o; its last king, See also:Edmund, having been defeated and taken prisoner, the vikings shot him to death with arrows because he would not See also:worship their gods.

His realm was annexed and partly settled by the conquerors. The See also:

fate of Mercia was hardly better: its king, Burgred, by See also:constant See also:payment of tribute, bought off the invaders for a space, but the eastern half of his realm was reduced to a See also:wilderness. Practically masters of all that lay north of See also:Thames, the " great army " next moved against Wessex, the only quarter where a vigorous resistance was still maintained against them, though its See also:capital, See also:Winchester, had been sacked in 864. Under two kings named Halfdan and Bacsceg, and six earls, they seized See also:Reading and began to harry See also:Berkshire, See also:Surrey and See also:Hampshire. King ,Ethelred, the third son of ,Ethelwulf, came out against them, with his See also:young brother Alfred and all the levies of Wessex. In the year 871 these two gallant kinsmen fought no less than six pitched battles against the invaders. Some were victories—notably the fight of Ashdown, where Alfred first won his name as a soldier—but the English failed to See also:capture the fortified camps of the vikings at Reading, and were finally beaten at See also:Marten (" Maeretun ") near Bedwyn, where ,Ethelred was mortally wounded. He See also:left young sons, but the men of Wessex crowned Alfred king, because they needed a grown man to See also:lead them in their Alfred the desperate campaigning. Yet his reign opened in-See also:Drew. auspiciously: defeated near See also:Wilton, he offered in despair to pay the vikings to depart. He must have known, from the experience of Mercian, Northumbrian and Frankish kings, that such See also:blackmail only bought a short See also:respite, but the See also:condition of his realm was such that even a moderate time for reorganization might prove valuable. The enemy had suffered so much in the " year of the six battles " that they held off for some space from Wessex, seeking easier prey on the continent and in northern England. In 874 they harried Mercia so cruelly that King Burgred fled in despair to Rome; the victors divided up his realm, taking the eastern half for themselves, and establishing in it a confederacy, whose jarls occupied the " five boroughs " of See also:Stamford, See also:Lincoln, See also:Derby, See also:Nottingham and See also:Leicester.

But the western half they handed over to " an unwise See also:

thegn named Ceolwulf," who bought for a short space the See also:precarious See also:title of king by paying great tribute. Alfred employed the four years of See also:peace, which he had bought in 871, in the endeavour to strengthen his realm against the inevitable return of the raiders. His See also:wisdom was shown by the fact that he concentrated his See also:attention on the one See also:device which must evidently prove effective for defence, if only he were given time to perfect it—the See also:building of a national navy. He began to lay down galleys and " long ships," and hired " pirates "—renegade vikings no doubt—to See also:train crews for him and to See also:teach his men See also:seamanship. The See also:scheme, however, was only partly completed when in 876 three Danish kings entered Wessex and resumed the war. But Alfred blockaded them first in See also:Wareham and then in See also:Exeter. The See also:fleet which was coming to carry themoff, or to bring them reinforcements, fought an indecisive engagement with the English ships, and was wrecked immediately after on the cliffs of the Isle of Purbeck, where more than See also:loo galleys and all their crews perished. On hearing of this disaster the vikings in Exeter surrendered the See also:place on being granted a See also:free departure. Yet within a few months of this successful See also:campaign Alfred was attacked at midwinter by the main Danish army under King See also:Guthrum. He was apparently, taken by surprise by an See also:assault at such an unusual time of the year, and was forced to See also:escape with his military See also:household to the isle of See also:Athelney among the marshes of the Parrett. The invaders harried See also:Wiltshire and Hampshire at their leisure, and vainly thought that Wessex was at last subdued. But with the See also:spring the English rallied: a Danish force was cut to pieces before See also:Easter by the men of See also:Devonshire.

A few See also:

weeks later Alfred had issued from Athelney, had collected a large army in Selwood, and went out to meet the enemy in the open See also:field. He beat them at Edington in Wiltshire, blockaded them in their great See also:camp at See also:Chippenham, and in fourteen days starved them into surrender. The terms were that they should give hostages, that they should depart for ever from Wessex, and that their king Guthrum should do homage to Alfred as overlord, and submit to be baptized, with thirty of his chiefs, Not only were all these conditions punctually fulfilled, but (what is more astonishing) the Danes had been so thoroughly cured of any See also:desire to try their See also:luck against the great king that they left him practically unmolested for fourteen years (878-892). King Guthrum settled down as a Christian sovereign in East Anglia, with the bulk of the host that had capitulated at Chippenham. Of the rest of the invaders one See also:section established a petty kingdom in See also:Yorkshire, but those in the Midlands were subject to no common sovereign but lived in a loose confederacy under the jarls of the " Five Boroughs " already named above. The boundary between English and Danes established by the peace of 878 is not perfectly ascertainable, but a document of Boundary between Alfred & Guth run, after 88&--,-._ a+++ Under English See also:rule, ... Under Danish & See also:Morse Under Celtic rule..—.- M The See also:floe Boroughs emu. Walk. a& a few years later, called " Alfred and Guthrum's frith," gives the border as lying from Thames northward up the See also:Lea to its source, then across to See also:Bedford, and then along the See also:Ouse to Watling See also:Street, the old Roman road from London to Chester. This gave King Alfred London and See also:Middlesex, most of See also:Hertford-See also:shire and See also:Bedfordshire, and the larger half of Mercia—lands that had never before been an integral part of Wessex, though they had some time been tributary to her kings. They were now taken inside the realm and governed by the ealdorman }Ethelred, the king's son-in-See also:law. The Mercians gladly mingled with the West Saxons, and abandoned all memories of ancient independence. Twenty years of schooling under the hand of the Dane had taught them to forget old particularism.

Alfred's enlarged kingdom was far more powerful than any one of the three new Danish states which lay beyond the Lea and Watling Street: it was to be seen, ere another generation was out, that it was stronger than all three together. But Alfred was not to see the happy day when York and Lincoln, See also:

Colchester and Leicester, were to become mere shire-capitals in the realm of See also:United England. The fourteen years of See also:comparative peace which he now enjoyed were devoted to perfecting the military organization of his enlarged kingdom. His fleet was reconstructed: Alfred's in 882 he went out with it in See also:person and destroyed a reforms. small piratical See also:squadron: in 885 we hear of it See also:coasting all along Danish East Anglia. But his navy was not yet strong enough to hold off all raids: it was not till the very end of his reign that he perfected it by building " long ships that were nigh twice as large as those of the heathen; some had 6o oars, some more; and they were both steadier and swifter and lighter than the others, and were shaped neither after the Frisian nor after the Danish See also:fashion, but as it seemed to himself that they would be most handy." This great war fleet he left as a See also:legacy to his son, but he himself in his later See also:campaigns had only its first beginnings at his disposal. His military reforms were no less important. Warned by the failures of the English against Danish entrenched 'camps, he introduced the long-neglected See also:art of fortification, and built many " burhs " —stockaded fortresses on mounds by the waterside—wherein dwelt permanent garrisons of military settlers. It would seem that the See also:system by which he maintained them was that he assigned to each a region of which the inhabitants were responsible for its See also:manning and its sustentation. The land-owners had either to build a house within it for their own inhabiting, or to provide that a competent substitute dwelt there to represent them. These " burh-See also:ware," or garrison-men, are repeatedly mentioned in Alfred's later years. The old national levy of the " See also:fyrd " was made somewhat more serviceable by an See also:ordinance which divided it into two halves, one of which must take the field when the other was dismissed.

But it would seem that the king paid even more attention to another military reform—the increase of the number of the professional fighting class, the thegnhood as it was now called. All the wealthier men, both in the countryside and in the towns, were required to take up the duties as well as the privileges of membership of the military household of the king. They became " of thegnright worthy " by receiving, really or nominally, a place in the royal See also:

hall, with the See also:obligation to take the field whenever their See also:master raised his banner. The document which defines their duties and privileges sets forth that " every ceorl who throve so that he had fully five hides of land, and a helm, and a See also:mail-See also:shirt, and a sword ornamented with See also:gold, was to be reckoned gesithcund." A second draft allowed the man who had the military equipment complete, but not fully the five hides of land, to slip into the See also:list, and also " the See also:merchant who has fared thrice over the high seas at his own expense." How far the details of the scheme are Alfred's own, how far they were developed by his son See also:Edward the See also:Elder, it is unfortunately impossible to say. But there is small doubt that the system was working to some extent in the later wars of the great king, and that his successes were largely due to the fact that his army contained a larger See also:nucleus of fully armed warriors than those of his predecessors. Military reforms were only one section of the work of King Alfred during the central years of his reign. It was then that he set afoot his numerous schemes for the restoration of the learning and culture of England which had sunk so See also:low during the long years of disaster which had preceded his See also:accession. How he gathered. scholars from the continent, Wales and See also:Ireland; how he collected the old heroic poems of the nation, how he himself translated books from the Latin See also:tongue, started See also:schools, and set his scribes to write up the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, is told else-where, as are his See also:mechanical inventions, his buildings, and his dealings with missionaries and explorers (see ALFRED). The test of the efficiency of his work was that it held See also:firm when, in his later years, the Danish storm once more began to beat against the shores of Wessex. In the years 892-896 Alfred was assailed from many sides at once by viking fleets, of which the most important was that led by the great freebooter Hasting. Moreover, the settled Danes of eastern England See also:broke their oaths and gave the invaders assistance. Yet the king held his own, with perfect success if not with ease.

The enemy was checked, beaten off, followed up rapidly whenever he changed his base of operation, and hunted repeatedly all across England. The campaigning ranged from Appledore in Kent to Exeter, from Chester to See also:

Shoeburyness; but wherever the invaders transferred themselves, either the king, or his son Edward, or his son-in-law Ethelred, the ealdorman of Mercia, was promptly at hand with a competent army. The camps of the Danes were stormed, their fleet was destroyed in the See also:river Lea in 895, and at last the remnant broke up and dispersed, some to seek easier See also:plunder in See also:France, others to See also:settle down among their kinsmen in Northumbria or East Anglia. Alfred survived for four years after his final See also:triumph in 896, to complete the organization of his fleet and to repair the See also:damages done by the last four years of constant fighting. He died on the 26th of See also:October 900, leaving Wessex well armed for the continuance of the struggle, and the inhabitants of the " See also:Danelagh much broken in spirit. They saw that it would never be in their power to subdue all England. Within a few years they were to realize that it was more probable that the English kings would subdue them. The house of Wessex continued to supply a race of hard-fighting and capable monarchs, who went on with Alfred's work. His son, Edward the Elder, and his three grandsons, IEthelstan, Edmund and See also:Edred, devoted themselves BatBeEmewara for fifty-five years (A.D. 900-955) to the task of con- quering n the Danelagh, and ended by making England into a single unified kingdom, not by admitting the conquered to homage and tribute, in the old See also:style of the 7th century, but by their complete absorption. The See also:process was not so hard as might be thought; when once the Danes had settled down, had brought over wives from their native land or taken them from among their English vassals, had built themselves See also:farm-steads and accumulated flocks and herds, they lost their old advantage in contending with the English. Their strength had been their mobility and their undisputed command of the sea.

But now they had possessions of their own to defend, and could not raid at large in Wessex or Mercia without exposing their homes to similar molestation. Moreover, the fleet which Alfred had built, and which his successors kept up, disputed their mastery of the sea, and ended by achieving a clear superiority over them. Unity of See also:

plan and unity of command was also on the See also:side of the English. The inhabitants of the three sections of the Danelagh were at best leagued in a many-headed confederacy. Their opponents were led by kings whose orders were punctually obeyed from See also:Shrewsbury to See also:Dover and from London to Exeter. It must also be remembered that in the greater part of the land which they possessed the Danes were but a small minority of the population. After their first fury was spent they no longer exterminated the conquered, but had been content to make the Mercians and Deirans their subjects, to take the best of the land, and exact tribute for the rest. Only in See also:Lincolnshire, East Yorkshire and parts of See also:Nottinghamshire and See also:Leicestershire do they seem.to have settled thickly and formed a preponderating See also:element in the countryside. In the rest of the Midlands and in East Anglia they were only a governing See also:oligarchy of scanty See also:numbers. Everywhere there was an English See also:lower class which welcomed the See also:advent of the conquering kings of Wessex and the fall of the Danish jarls. Edward the Elder spent twenty-five laborious years first in repelling and repaying Danish raids, then in setting to work to subdue the raiders. He worked forward into the Danelagh, building burhs as he advanced, to hold down each district that he won.

He was helped by his brother-in-law, the Mercian ealdorman "Ethelred, and, after the death of that See also:

magnate, by his warlike See also:sister "Ethelflxd, the ealdorman's widow, who was continued in her See also:husband's place. While Edward, with London as his base, pushed forward into the eastern counties, his sister, starting from See also:Warwick and See also:Stafford, encroached on the Danelagh along the line of the See also:Trent. The last Danish king of East Anglia was slain in battle in 918, and his realm annexed. 'Ethel- won Derby and Leicester, while her brother reduced Stamford and Nottingham. Finally, in 921, not only was the whole land See also:south of. the See also:Humber subdued, but the Yorkshire Danes, the Welsh, and even—it is said—the remote Scots of the North, did homage to Edward and became his men. In 925 Edward was succeeded by his eldest, son 1Ethelstan, who completed the reduction of the Danelagh by See also:driving out Guthfrith, the Danish king of York, and annexing his realm. But this first conquest of the region beyond Humber had to be repeated over and over again; time after time the Danes rebelled and proclaimed a new king, aided sometimes by bands of their kinsmen from Ireland or Norway, sometimes by the Scots and See also:Strathclyde Welsh. "Ethelstan's greatest and best-remembered achievement was his decisive victory in 937 at Brunanburh—an unknown spot, probably by the Solway See also:Firth or the Ribble over a great confederacy of See also:rebel Danes of Yorkshire, Irish Danes from See also:Dublin, the Scottish king, See also:Constantine, and See also:Eugenius, king of Strathclyde. Yet even after such a triumph "Ethelstan had to set up a Danish under-king in Yorkshire, apparently despairing of holding it down as a shire governed by a mere ealdorman. But its over-lordship he never lost, and since he also maintained the supremacy which his See also:father had won over the Welsh and Scots, it was not without See also:reason that he called himself on his coins and in his charters Rex totius Britanniae. Occasionally he even used the title Basileus, as if he claimed a quasi-imperial position. The trampling out of the last embers of Danish particularism in the North was reserved for "Ethelstan's brothers and suc- cessors, Edmund and Edred (940-955), who put down Edmund: several risings of the Yorkshiremen, one of which was Edred.

aided by a See also:

rebellion of the Midland Danes of the Five Boroughs. But the untiring perseverance of the house of Alfred was at last rewarded by success. After the See also:expulsion of the last rebel king of York, See also:Eric Haraldson, by Edred in 948, we cease to hear of trouble in the North. When next there was rebellion in that quarter it was in favour of a Wessex See also:prince, not of a Danish adventurer, and had no sinister national significance. The descendants of the vikings were easily incorporated in the English race, all the more so because of the See also:wise policy of the conquering kings, who readily employed and often promoted to high station men of Danish descent who showed themselves loyal—and this not only in the secular but in spiritual offices. In 942 Oda, a full-blooded Dane, was made archbishop of Canter-See also:bury. The Danelagh became a See also:group of earldoms, ruled by officials who were as often of Danish as of English descent. It is notable that when, after Edred's death, there was See also:civil strife, owing to the See also:quarrel of his See also:nephew See also:Edwy with some of his kinsmen, ministers and bishops, the rebels, who included the See also:majority of the Mercians and Northumbrians, set up as their pretender to the throne not a Dane but Edwy's younger brother See also:Edgar, who ruled for a short time north of Thames, and became See also:sole monarch on the death of his unfortunate kinsman. The reign of Edgar (959-975) saw the See also:culmination of the power of the house of Alfred. It was untroubled by rebellionor by See also:foreign invasions, so that the king won the See also:honourable title of Rex Pacificus. The See also:minor sovereigns of Britain owned him as overlord, as they had owned his grandfather Edgar. Edward and his See also:uncle "Ethelstan.

It was long remembered " how all the kings of this island, both the Welsh and the Scots, eight kings, came to him once upon a time on one day and all bowed to his governance." The eight were See also:

Kenneth of See also:Scotland, See also:Malcolm of Strathclyde, Maccus of Man, and five Welsh kings. There is See also:fair authority for the well-known See also:legend that, after this See also:meeting at Chester, he was rowed in his See also:barge down the Dee by these potentates, such a See also:crew as never was seen before or after, and afterwards exclaimed that those who followed him might now truly boast that they were kings of all Britain. Edgar's chief counsellor was the famous archbishop See also:Dunstan, to whom no small part of the See also:glory of his reign has been ascribed. This great See also:prelate was an ecclesiastical reformer—a See also:leader in a See also:movement for the general See also:purification of morals, and especially for the repressing of See also:simony and evil-living among the clergy—a great builder of churches, and a stringent enforcer of the rules of the monastic life. But he was also a busy statesman; he probably had a share in the considerable See also:body of legislation which was enacted in Edgar's reign, and is said to have encouraged him in his policy of treating Dane and Englishman with exact equality, and of investing the one no less than the other with the highest offices in church and state. Edgar's life was too short for the welfare of his people—he was only in his thirty-third year when he died in 975, and his sons were young boys. The hand of a strong man was still needed to keep the peace in the newly-constituted realm of all England, and the evils of a minority were not long in showing themselves. One section of the magnates had See also:possession of the thirteen-yearold king Edward, and used his name to See also:cover their ambitions. The other was led by his step-See also:mother iElfthryth, who was set on pushing the claims of her son, the See also:child "Ethelred. After much factious strife, and many stormy meetings of the See also:Witan, Edward was murdered at Carle in 978 by some thegns of the party of the See also:queen-See also:dowager. The See also:crime provoked universal indignation, but since there was no other prince of the house of Alfred avail-able, the magnates were forced to place "Ethelred on the throne: he was only in his See also:eleventh year, and was at least personally See also:innocent of complicity in his brother's death. With the accession of "Ethelred, the " Redeless," as he was afterwards called from his inability to discern good counsel from evil, and the consistent incapacity of his policy, an evil time began.

The retirement from public life of Edgar's old See also:

minister Dunstan was the first event of the new reign, and no man of capacity came forward to take his place. The factions which had prevailed during the reign of Edward " the See also:Martyr " seem to have continued to rage during his brother's minority, yet'Ethelred's earliest years were his least disastrous. It was hoped that when he came to See also:roan's See also:estate things would improve, but the See also:reverse was the See also:case. The first See also:personal action recorded of him is an unjust harrying of the goods of his own subjects, when he besieged See also:Rochester because he had quarrelled with its bishop over certain lands, and was bribed to depart with Too pounds of See also:silver. Yet from 978 to 991 no irreparable harm came to England; the machinery for See also:government and defence which his ancestors had established seemed fairly competent to defend the realm even under a wayward and incapable king. Two or three small descents o; vikings are recorded, but the ravaging was purely local, and the invader soon departed. No trouble occurred in the Danelagh, where the old tendency of the inhabitants to take sides with their See also:pagan kinsmen from over the sea appears to have completely vanished. But the vikings had apparently learnt by small experiments that England was no longer Danis!' guarded as she had been in the days of Alfred or invasions. "Ethelstan, and in 991 the first serious invasion of .Ethelred's reign took place. A large fleet came ashore in Essex, and, after a hard fight with the ealdorman Brihtnoth at See also:Maldon, slew him and began to ravage the district north of the Thames. .E.thelstan. ,Ethelred the Unready.

Instead of making a desperate attempt to drive them off, the king bribed them to depart with zo,000 pounds of silver, accepting it is said this cowardly See also:

advice from archbishop Sigeric. The fatal precedent soon See also:bore See also:fruit: the invaders came back in larger numbers, headed by See also:Olaf Tryggveson, the celebrated adventurer who afterwards made himself king of Norway, and who was already a pretender to its throne. He was helped by Sweyn, king of Denmark, and the two together laid See also:siege to London in 994, but were beaten off by the citizens. Nevertheless 'Ethelred for a second time stooped to pay tribute, and bought the departure of Dane and Norwegian with 16,000 pounds of silver. There was a precarious See also:interval of peace for three years after, but in 997 began a See also:series of invasions led by Sweyn which lasted for seventeen years, and at last ended in the complete subjection of England and the See also:flight of 'Ethelred to See also:Normandy. It should be noted that the invader during this period was no mere adventurer, but king of all Denmark, and, after Olaf Tryggveson's death in moo, king of Norway also. His power was something far greater than that,of the Guthrums and Anlafs of an earlier generation, and—in the end of his life at least—he was aiming at political conquest, and not either at mere plunder or at finding new settlements for his followers. But if the strength of the invader was greater than that of his predecessors, 'Ethelred also was far better equipped for war than his ancestors of the 9th century. He owned, and he some-times used—but always to little profit—a large fleet, while all England instead of the mere realm of Wessex was at his back. Any one of the great princes of the house of Egbert who had reigned from 871 to 975, would have fought a winning fight with such resources, and it took nearly twenty years of /Ethelred's tried incapacity to lose the See also:game. He did, however, succeed in undoing all the work of his ancestors; partly by his own slackness and See also:sloth, partly by his choice of corrupt and treacherous ministers. For the two ealdormen whom he delighted to See also:honour and placed at the head of his armies, 'Elfric and Eadric Streona, are accused, the one of persistent cowardice, the other of underhand intrigue with the Danes.

Some of the local magnates made a desperate defence of their own regions, especially Ulfkytel of East Anglia, a Dane by descent; but the central government was at See also:

fault. lEthelred's army was always at the wrong place—" if the enemy were east then was the fyrd held west, and if they were north then was our force held south." When 'Ethelred did appear it was more often to pay a bribe to the invaders than to fight. Indeed the See also:Danegeld, the tax which he raised to furnish tribute to the invaders, became a See also:regular institution: on six occasions at least 'Ethelred bought a few months of peace by sums ranging from io,000 to 48,000 pounds of silver. At last in the See also:winter of r0r3-1014, more as it would seem from sheer disgust at their king's cowardice and incompetence than Canwte. because further resistance was impossible, the English gave up the struggle and acknowledged Sweyn as king. First Northumbria, then Wessex, then London yielded, and 'Ethelred was forced to See also:fly over seas to See also:Richard, See also:duke of Nor. mandy, whose sister he had married as his second wife. But Sweyn survived his triumph little over a See also:month; he died suddenly at See also:Gainsborough on the 3rd of See also:February 1014. The Danes hailed his son Canute, a lad of eighteen, as king, but many of the English, though they had submitted to a hard-handed conqueror like Sweyn, were not prepared to be handed over like slaves to his untried successor. There was a general rising, the old king was brought over from Normandy, and Canute was driven out for a moment by force of arms. He returned next year with a greater army to hear soon after of 'Ethelred's death (ror6). The witan See also:chose Edmund " Ironside," the See also:late king's eldest son, to succeed him, and as he was a hard-fighting prince of that normal type of his house to which his father had been such a disgraceful exception, it seemed probable that the Danes might be beaten off. But :Ethelred's favourite Eadric Streona adhered to Canute, fearing to lose the See also:office and power that he had. enjoyed for so long under 'Ethelred, and prevailed on the magnates of part of Wessex and Mercia to follow his example. For a moment the HISTORY [994--1o18 curious phenomenon was seen of Canute reigning in Wessex, while Edmund was making head against him with the aid of the Anglo-Danes of the " Five Boroughs and Northumbria. There followed a year of desperate struggle: the two young kings fought five pitched battles, See also:fortune seemed to favour Edmund, and the traitor Eadric submitted to him with all Wessex.

But the last engagement, at Assandun (Ashingdon) in Essex went against the English, mainly because Eadric again betrayed the national catise and deserted to the enemy. Edmund was so hard See also:

hit by this last disaster that he offered to See also:divide the realm with Canute; they met on the isle of Alney near See also:Gloucester, and agreed that the son of }Ethelred should keep Wessex and all the South, London and East Anglia, while the Dane should have Northumbria, the five boroughs " and Eadric's Mercian earldom. But ere the year was out Edmund died: secretly murdered, according to some authorities, by the infamous Eadrie. The witan of Wessex made no attempt to set on the throne either one of the younger sons of 'Ethelred by his See also:Norman wife, or the See also:infant See also:heir of Edmund, but chose Canute as king, preferring to reunite England by submission to the stranger rather than to continue the disastrous war. They were wise in so doing, though their See also:motive may have been despair rather than long-sighted policy. Canute became more of an Englishman than a Dane: he spent more of his time in his island realm than in his native Denmark. He paid off and sent See also:home the great army with whose aid he had won the English crown, retaining only a small bodyguard of " house-carls " and trusting to the See also:loyalty of his new subjects. There was no See also:confiscation of lands for the benefit of intrusive Danish settlers. On the contrary Canute had more English than Danish courtiers and ministers about his person, and sent many Englishmen as bishops and some even as royal See also:officers to Denmark. It is See also:strange to find that—whether from policy or from affection—he married King 'Ethelred's young widow Emma of Normandy, though she was somewhat older than himself-so that his son King Harthacnut and that son's successor Edward the See also:Confessor, the heir of the line of Wessex, were half-brothers. It might have been thought likely that the son of the pagan Sweyn would have turned out a mere hard-fighting viking. But Canute developed into a great See also:administrator and a friend of learning and culture.

Occasionally he committed a harsh and tyrannical See also:

act. Though he need not be blamed for making a prompt end of the traitor Eadric Streona and of Uhtred, the turbulent See also:earl of Northumbria, at the commencement of his reign, there are other and less justifiable deeds of See also:blood to be laid to his See also:account. But they were but few; for the most part his See also:administration was just and wise as well as strong and intelligent. As long as he lived England was the centre of a great Northern empire, for Canute reconquered Norway, which had lapsed into independence after his father's death, and extended his power into the Baltic. Moreover, all the so-called Scandinavian colonists in the Northern Isles and Ireland owned him as over-lord. So did the Scottish king Malcolm, and the princes of Wales and Strathclyde. The one weak point in his policy that can be detected is that he left in the hands of Malcolm the Bernician district of See also:Lothian, which the See also:Scot had conquered during the anarchy that followed the death of 'Ethelred. The battle of Carham (ror8) had given this land to the Scots, and Canute consented to draw the border line of England at the See also:Tweed instead of at the Firth of Forth, when Malcolm did him homage. Strangely enough it was this cession of a Northumbrian earldom to the Northern king that ultimately made Scotland an English-speaking country. For the Scottish kings, deserting their native See also:Highlands, took to dwelling at See also:Edinburgh among their new subjects, and first the court and afterwards the whole of their Low-land subjects were gradually assimilated to the Northumbrian nucleus which formed both the most fertile and the most civilized portion of their enlarged realm. The fact: that England recovered with marvellous rapidity from the evil effects of 'Ethelred's disastrous reign, and achieved great See also:wealth and prosperity under Canute, would seem to show that the ravages of Sweyn, widespread and ruthless though they had been, had yet fallen short of the devastating completeness of those of the earlier vikings. He had been more set on exacting tribute than on perpetrating wanton massacres.

A few years of peace and wise administration seem to have restored the realm to' a satisfactory condition. A considerable See also:

mass of his legislation has survived to show Canute's care for law and See also:order. Canute died in 1035, aged not more than See also:forty or forty-one. The crown was disputed between his two sons, the half-brothers Harold and Harthacnut; it was doubtful whether the See also:birth of the elder prince was legitimate, and Queen Emma strove to get her own son Harthacnut preferred to him. In Denmark the younger claimant was acknowledged by the whole people, but in England the Mercian and Northumbrian earls chose Harold as king, and Wessex only fell to Harthacnut. Both the young kings were cruel, dissolute and wayward, most unworthy sons of a wise father. It was to the great profit of England that they died within two years of each other, the elder in 1040, the younger in 1042. On Harthacnut's death he was succeeded not by any Danish prince but by his half-brother Edward, the elder son of 'Ethelred and Emma, whom he had entertained at his court, and Edward had apparently designated as his heir, for he had no the offspring. There was an end of the empire of Canute, Confessor. for Denmark fell to the great king's nephew, Sweyn Estrithson, and Norway had thrown off the Danish yoke. En-gaged in wars with each other, Dane and Norseman had no leisure to think of reconquering England. Hence Edward's accession took place without any See also:friction.

He reigned, but did not rule, for twenty-four years, though he was well on in See also:

middle age before he was crowned. Of all the descendants of Alfred he was the only one who lived to see his sixtieth birthday—the house of Wessex were a short-lived race. In See also:character he differed from all his ancestors—he had Alfred's piety without his capacity, and fEthelred's weakness without his vices. The mildest of men, a crowned See also:monk, who let slip the reins of government from his hands while he busied himself in See also:prayer and church building, he lowered the kingly power to a See also:depth to which it had never sunk before in England. His sole See also:positive quality, over and above his piety, was a love for his mother's See also:kin, the See also:Normans. He had spent his whole life from 10r3 to 1040 as an exile at the court of See also:Rouen, and was far more of a Norman than an Englishman. It was but natural, therefore, that he should invite his See also:continental relatives and the See also:friends of his youth to share in his late-coming prosperity. But when he filled his court with them, made them earls and bishops, and appointed one of them, See also:Robert of Jumieges, to the archbishopric of Canterbury, his undisguised preference for strangers gave no small offence to his English subjects. In the main, however, the king's personal likes and dislikes mattered little to the realm, since he had a comparatively small share in its governance. He was habitually overruled and dominated by his earls, of whom three, See also:Leofric, See also:Godwine and Siward—all old servants of Canute—had far more power than their master. Holding respectively the great earldoms of West Mercia, Wessex and Northumbria, they reigned almost like petty sovereigns in their domains, and there seemed some chance that England might fall apart into semi-independent feudal states, just as France had done in the preceding century. The rivalries and intrigues of these three magnates constitute the main part of the domestic politics of Edward's reign.

Godwine, whose Harold. daughter had wedded the king, was the most forcible and ambitious of the three, but his pre-See also:

eminence provoked a general league against him and in 1051 he was See also:cast out of the kingdom with his sons. In the next year he returned in arms, raised Wessex in revolt, and compelled the king to in-law him again, to restore his earldom, and to dismiss with ignominy the Norman favourites who were hunted over seas. The old earl died in 1053, but was succeeded in power by his son Harold, who for thirteen years maintained an unbroken mastery over the king, and ruled England almost with the power of a See also:regent. There seems little doubt that he aspired to be Edward's successor: there was no See also:direct heir to the crown, and the nearest of kin was an infant, Edgar, the great-nephew of the reigning sovereignand See also:grandson of Edmund Ironside. England's experience of minors on the throne had been unhappy—Edwy and Ethelred the Redeless were warnings rather than examples. Moreover, Harold had before his See also:eye as a precedent the displacement of the effete Carolingian line in France, by the new house of Robert the Strong and See also:Hugh See also:Capet, seventy years before, He prepared for the crisis that must come at the death of Edward the Confessor by bestowing the governance of several earldoms upon his brothers. Unfortunately for him, however, the eldest of them, See also:Tostig, proved the greatest hindrance to his plans, provoking wrath and opposition wherever he went by his high-handedness and cruelty. Harold's governance of the realm seems to have been on the whole successful. He put down the Scottish usurper See also:Macbeth with the swords of a Northumbrian army, and restored Malcolm III. to the throne of that kingdom (1o55-1058). He led an army into the See also:heart of Wales to punish the raids of King See also:Griffith ap See also:Llewelyn, and harried the Welsh so bitterly that they put their leader to death, and renewed their homage to the English crown (1063). He won enthusiastic devotion from the men of Wessex and the South, but in Northumbria and Mercia he was less liked. His experiment in taking the rule of these earldoms out of the hands of the descendants of See also:Siward and Leofric proved so unsuccessful that he had to resign himself to undoing it.

Ultimately one of Leofric's grandsons, Edwin, was left as earl of Mercia, and the other, See also:

Morcar, became earl of Northumbria instead of Harold's unpopular brother Tostig. It was on this fact that the fortune of England was to turn, for in the See also:hour of crisis Harold was to be betrayed by the lords of the Midlands and the North. Somewhere about the end of his period of ascendancy, perhaps in 1064, Harold was sailing in the Channel when his See also:ship was driven ashore by a See also:tempest near the mouth of the origin See also:Somme. He fell into the hands of See also:William the See also:Bastard, of the duke of Normandy, King Edward's See also:cousin and best- Norman loved relative. The duke brought him to Rouen, and conquest-kept him in a See also:kind of honourable captivity till he had extorted a strange See also:pledge from him. William alleged that his cousin had promised to make him his heir, and to recommend him to the witan as king of England. He demanded that Harold should swear to aid him in the project. Fearing for his personal safety, the earl gave the required See also:oath, and sailed home a perjured man, for he had assuredly no intention of keeping the promise that had been extorted from him. Within two years King Edward expired (See also:Jan. 5, io66) after having recommended Harold as his successor to the thegns and bishops who stood about his deathbed. The witan chose the earl as king without any show of doubt, though the assent of the Mercian and Northumbrian earls must have been half-hearted. Not a word was said in favour of the claim of the child Edgar, the heir of the house of Alfred, nothing (of course) for the preposterous claim of William of Normandy.

Harold accepted the crown without a moment's hesitation, and at once prepared to defend it, for he was aware that the Norman would fight to gain its purpose. He endeavoured to conciliate Edwin and Morcar by marrying their sister Ealdgyth, and trusted that he had bought their loyal support. When the spring came See also:

round it was known that William had begun to collect a great fleet and army. Aware that the resources of his own duchy were inadequate to the conquest of England, he sent all over Europe to hire mercenaries, promising every See also:knight who would join him broad lands beyond the Channel in the event of victory. He gathered beneath his banner thousands of adventurers not only from France, See also:Brittany and See also:Flanders, but even from distant regions such as See also:Aragon, See also:Apulia and See also:Germany. The native Normans were but a third part of his host, and he himself commanded rather as director of a great See also:joint-stock venture than as the feudal chief of his own duchy. He also obtained the blessing of Pope See also:Alexander II. for his enterprise, partly on the plea that Harold was a perjurer, partly because See also:Stigand, the archbishop of Canterbury, had acknowledged the late See also:anti-pope See also:Benedict. All through the 'summer Harold held a fleet concentrated under the See also:lee of the Isle of See also:Wight, waiting to intercept William's armament, while the fyrd of Wessex was ready to support him if the enemy should succeed in making a landing. By See also:September the provisions were spent, and the ships were growing ;unseaworthy. Very reluctantly the king bade them go round to London to refit and revictual themselves. William meanwhile had been unable to See also:sail, because for many weeks the See also:wind had been unfavourable. If it had set from the south the fortune of England would have been settled by a sea-fight.

At this moment came a sudden and incalculable diversion; Harold's turbulent brother Tostig, banished for his crimes in 1065, was seeking revenge. He had persuaded Harold Hardrada, king of Norway, almost the last of the great viking adventurers, to take him as See also:

guide for a raid on England. They ran into the Humber with a great fleet, beat the earls Edwin and Morcar in battle, and captured York. Abandoning his See also:watch on the south coast Harold of England flew northward to meet the invaders;. he surprised them at Stamford See also:Bridge, slew both the Norse king and the rebel earl, and almost exterminated their army (See also:Sept. 25? Io66). But while he was absent from the Channel the wind turned, and William of Normandy put to sea. The English fleet -and the English army were both absent, and the Normans came safely to shore on the 28th of September. Harold had to turn hastily southward to meet them. On the 13th of October his host was arrayed on the See also:hill of Senlac, q miles from the duke's camp. at See also:Hastings. The ranks of his thegnhood and house-carles had ,been thinned by the slaughter of Stamford Bridge, and their place was but indifferently supplied by the hasty levies of London, Wessex and the Home Counties. Edwin and Morcar, who should have been at his side with their Mercians and Northumbrians, were still far away—probably from treachery, slackness and See also:jealousy.

Next See also:

morning (October 14) William marched out from Hastings and attacked the English host, which stood at See also:bay in a solid mass of See also:spear and axemen behind a slight breastwork on the hillside. After six See also:hours of desperate fighting the victory fell to the duke, who skilfully alternated the use of archers and See also:cavalry against the unwieldy English See also:phalanx. (See HASTINGS: Battle of.) The disaster was complete, Harold himself was slain, his two brothers had fallen with him, not even the See also:wreck of an army escaped. There was no one to rally the English in the name of the house of Godwine. The witan met and hastily saluted the child Edgar AEtheling as king. But the earls Edwin and Morcar refused to fight for him, and when William appeared in front of the See also:gates of London they were opened almost without resistance. He was elected king in the old English fashion by the surviving magnates, and crowned on See also:Christmas Day Io66. H. THE NORMAN AND ANGEVIN MONARCHY (Io66-1199) When William of Normandy was crowned at See also:Westminster by Archbishop See also:Aldred of York and acknowledged as king by the witan, it is certain that few Englishmen understood wnvam the full importance of the occasion. It is probable theCon- gaeror. that most men recalled the See also:election of Canute, and supposed that the accession of the one See also:alien sovereign would have no more permanent effect on the realm than that of the other. The rule of the Danish king and his two short-lived sons had caused no break in the social or constitutional history of England. Canute had become an Englishman, had accepted all the old institutions of the nation, had dismissed his host of vikings, and had ruled like a native king and for the most part with native ministers.

Within twenty years of his accession the disasters and calamities which had preceded his triumph had been forgotten, and the national life was See also:

running quietly in its old channels. But the accession of William the Bastard meant something very different. Canute had been an impressionable lad of eighteen or nineteen when he was crowned; he was ready and eager to learn and to forget. He had found himself con-fronted in England with a higher civilization and a more advanced social organization than those which he had known in his boyhood, and he accepted them with alacrity, feeling that he was thereby getting advantage. With William the Normanall was different: he was a man well on in middle age, too old to adapt himself easily to new surroundings, even if he had been willing to do so. He never even learnt the See also:language of his English subjects, the first step to comprehending their needs and their views. Moreover, unlike his Danish predecessor, he looked down upon the English from the See also:plane of a higher civilization; the Normans regarded the conquered nation as barbarous and boorish. The difference in customs and culture between the dwellers on the two sides of the Channel was sufficient to make this possible; though it is hard to discern any adequate See also:justification for the Norman attitude. Probably the See also:bar of language was the most prominent cause of estrangement. In five generations the viking settlers of Normandy had not only completely forgotten their old Scandinavian tongue, but had come to look upon those who spoke the kindred English See also:idiom not only as aliens but as inferiors. For three centuries See also:French remained the court speech, and' the See also:mark of civilization and gentility. Despite all this the Conquest would not have had its actual results if William, like Canute, had been able to dismiss his conquering army, and to refrain from a general policy progress of confiscation.

But he had won his crown not as of Norman duke of Normandy, but as the head of a band of cosmo- settlepolitan adventurers, who had to be rewarded with land See also:

meat. in England. Some few received their pay in hard See also:cash, and went off to other wars; but the large majority, See also:Breton and Angevin, French and See also:Fleming, no less than Norman, wanted land. William could only provide it by a wholesale confiscation of the estates of all the thegnhood who had followed the house of Godwine. Almost his first act was to seize on these lands, and to distribute them among his followers. In the regions of the South, which had supplied the army that fell at Hastings, at least four-fifths of the See also:soil passed to new masters. The dispossessed heirs of the old owners had either to sink to the condition of peasants, or to throw themselves upon the See also:world and seek new homes. The friction and hatred thus caused were See also:bitter and long enduring. And this same system of confiscation was gradually extended to the rest of England. At first the English landowners who had not actually served in Harold's host were permitted to " buy back their lands," by paying a heavy See also:fine to the new king and doing him homage. What would have happened supposing that England had made no further stir, and had not vexed William by rebellion, it is impossible to say. But, as a See also:matter of fact, during the first few years of his reign one district after another took up arms and endeavoured to cast out the stranger. As it became gradually evident that William's whole system of government was to be on new and distasteful lines, the English of the Midlands, the North and the West, all went into rebellion.

The risings were sporadic, See also:

ill-organized, badly led, for each section of the realm fought for its own hand. In some parts the insurrections were in favour of the sons of Harold, in others Edgar fEtheling was acclaimed as king: and while the unwise earls Edwin and Morcar fought for their own hand, the Anglo-Danes of the East sent for Sweyn, king of Denmark, who proved of small help, for he See also:abode but a short space in England, and went off after sacking the great See also:abbey of See also:Peterborough and committing other outrages. The rebels cut up several Norman garrisons, and gave King William much trouble for some years, but they could never See also:face him in battle. Their last stronghold, the See also:marsh-fortress of See also:Ely, surrendered in 1071, and not long after their most stubborn chief, See also:Hereward " the See also:Wake," the leader of the fenmen, laid down his arms and became King William's man (see HEREWARD). The only result of the long series of insurrections was tp, provoke the king to a cruelty which he had not at first shown, and to give him an excuse for confiscating and dividing among his foreign knights and barons the immense majority of the estates of the English thegnhood. William could be pitiless when provoked; to punish the men of the North for persistent rebellion and the destruction of his garrison at York, he harried the whple countryside from the See also:Aire to the See also:Tees with such remorseless ferocity that it did not recover its ancient prosperity for centuries. The population was absolutely exterminated, and the great Domesday survey, made nearly twenty years later, shows the greater part of Yorkshire as "See also:waste." This act was exceptional only in its extent: the king was as cruel on a smaller scale elsewhere, and not contented with the liberal use of the See also:axe and the rope was wont to inflict his favourite punishments of See also:blinding and See also:mutilation on a most reckless scale. The See also:net result of the king's revenge on the rebellious English was that by 1075 the old governing class had almost entirely disappeared, and that their lands, from the Channel to the Tweed, had everywhere been distributed to new holders. To a great extent the same See also:horde of continental adventurers who had obtained the first batch of grants in Wessex and Kent were also the recipients of the later confiscations, so that their newly acquired estates were scattered all over England. Many of them came to own land in ten or a dozen counties remote from each other, a fact which was of the greatest importance in determining the character of English See also:feudalism. While abroad the great vassals of the crown generally held their See also:property in compact blocks, in England their power was weakened by the See also:dispersion of their lands. This tendency was assisted by the fact that even when the king, as was his See also:custom, transferred to a Norman the estates of an English landowner just as they stood, those estates were already for the most part not conterminous.

Even before the Conquest the lands of the magnates were to a large extent held in scattered See also:

units, not in solid patches. Only in two cases did William establish lordships of compact strength, and these were created for the See also:special purpose of guarding the turbulent Welsh See also:March. The " See also:palatine " earls of Chester and Shrewsbury were not only endowed with special See also:powers and rights of See also:jurisdiction, but were almost the only tenants-in-chief within their respective shires. These rare exceptions prove the general rule: William probably foresaw the dangers of such See also:accumulation of territory in private hands. He made a complete end of the old English system by which great earls ruled many shires: there were to be no Godwines or Leofrics under the Norman rule. This particular feudal danger was avoided: where earls were created, and they were but few, their authority was usually restricted to a single shire. It remains to speak of the most important See also:change which William's rearrangements made in the polity of England. It Feudalism. is of course untrue to say—as was so often done by See also:early historians—that he " introduced the feudal system into England." In some aspects feudalism was already in the land before he arrived: in others it may be said 'that it was never introduced at all. He did not introduce the practice by which the smail man commended himself to the great man, and in return for his See also:protection divested himself of the full ownership of his own land, and became a customary See also:tenant in what later ages called a " See also:manor." That system was already in full operation in England before the Conquest. In some districts the wholly free small landowner had already disappeared, though in the regions which had formed the Danelagh he was still to be found in large numbers. Nor did William introduce the system of great earldoms, passing from father to son, which gave over-great subjects a hereditary grip on the countryside. On the contrary, as has been already said, he did much to check that tendency, which had already developed in England.

What he really did do was to reconstruct society on the essentially feudal theory that the land was a See also:

gift from the king, held on conditions of homage and military service. The duties which under the old system were national obligations resting on the individual as a See also:citizen, he made into duties depending on the relation between the king as supreme landowner and the subject as tenant of the land. Military service and the paying of the feudal taxes—aids, reliefs, &c.—are incidents of the bargain between the crown and the grantee to whom land has been given. That grantee, the tenant-in-chief, has the right to demand from his sub-tenants, to whom he has given out fractions of his estate, the same dues that the king exacts from himself. As at least four-fifths of the land of England had fallen into the king's hands between 1066 and 1074, and had been actuallyregranted to new owners—foreigners to whom the feudal system was the only conceivable organization of political existence—the change was not only easy but natural. The few surviving English landholders had to fall into line with the newcomers. England, in short, was reorganized into a state of the continental type, but one differing from France or Germany in that the crown had not lost so many of its regalities as abroad, and that even the greater earls had less power than the See also:ordinary continental tenant-in-chief. The English people became aware of this transformation in the " theory of the state" mainly through the fact that the new tenants-in-chief, bringing with them the ideas in which they had been reared, failed to comprehend the rather complicated status of the rural population on this side of the Channel. To the French or Norman knight all peasants on his manor seemed to be villeins, and he failed to understand the distinction between freemen who had personally commended themselves to his English predecessor but still owned their land, and the mass of ordinary servile tenants. There can be no doubt that the first effect of the Conquest was that the upper strata of the agricultural classes lost the comparative independence which they had hitherto enjoyed, and were in many cases depressed to the level of their inferiors. The number of freemen began to decrease, from the encroachments of the landowner, and continued to dwindle for many years: even indistricts where Domesday Book shows them surviving in considerable numbers, it is clear that a generation or two later they had largely disappeared, and became merged in the villein class. In this sense, therefore, England was turned into a feudal state by the results of the work of William the Conqueror.

But it would be wrong to assert that all traces of the ancient social organization of the realm were swept Domesday. away. The old Saxon customs were not forgotten, though they might in many cases be See also:

twisted to fit new surroundings. Indeed William and his successors not infrequently caused them to be collected and put on record. The famous Domesday Book (q.v.) of Io86 is in its essential nature an inquiry into the state of England at the moment of the Conquest, compiled in order that the king may have a full knowledge of the rights that he possesses as the heir of King Edward. Being primarily intended to facilitate the levy of See also:taxation, it dwells more on the details of the actual wealth and resources of the country in 1066 and ro86, and less on the laws and customs that governed the See also:distribution of that wealth, than could have been wished. But it is nevertheless a See also:monument of the permanence of the old English institutions, even after the ownership of four-fifths of the soil has been changed. The king inquires into the state of things in Io66 because it is on that state of things that his rights of taxation depend. He does not claim to have rearranged the whole realm on a new basis, or to be levying his See also:revenue on a new See also:assessment made at his own See also:pleasure. Nor is it in the See also:sphere of taxation alone that William's organization of the realm stands on the old English customs. In the military sphere, though his normal army is the feudal force composed of the tenants-in-chief and the knights whom they have enfeoffed, he retains the power to call out the fyrd, the old national See also:levee en masse, without regard to whether its members are freemen or villeins of some lord. And in judicial matters the higher rights of royal See also:justice remain intact, except in the fewcases where special privileges have been granted to one or two palatine earls. The villein must See also:sue in his lord's manorial courts, but he is also subject to the royal courts of hundred and shire.

The machinery of the local courts survives for the most part intact. William's dealings with the Church of England were no less important than his dealings with social organization. In the earlier years of his reign he set himself to get rid of the whole of the upper See also:

hierarchy, in order to replace ot the Pos on t them by Normans. In Io7o Archbishop Stigand was antra. deposed as having been uncanonically chosen, and six or seven other bishops after him. All the vacancies, as well as those which kept occurring during the next few years, were immediately filled up with foreigners. By the time that William had been ten years on the throne there were only three English bishops left. At his death there was only one-the saintly See also:Wulfstan of See also:Worcester. The same process was carried out with regard to abbacies, and indeed with all important places of ecclesiastical preferment. By io8o the English Church was officered entirely by aliens. Just as with the lay landholders, the change of personnel made a vast difference, not so much in the legal position of the new-corners as in the way in which they regarded their office. The outlook of a Norman bishop was as unlike that of his English predecessor as that of a Norman See also:baron. The English Church had got out of See also:touch with the ideals and the spiritual movements of the other Western churches.

In especial the great monastic revival which had started from the abbey of See also:

Cluny and spread all over France, See also:Italy and Germany had hardly touched this island. The continental churchmen of the nth century were brimming over with ascetic zeal and militant energy, while the majority of the English hierarchy were slack and easy-going. The typical faults of the dark ages, See also:pluralism, simony, lax observation of the clerical rules, contented See also:ignorance, worldliness in every aspect, were all too prevalent in England. There can be no doubt that the greater part of William's nominees were better men than those who preceded them; his great See also:arch-bishop, See also:Lanfranc, though a busy statesman, was also an energetic reformer and a man of See also:holy life. Osmund, See also:Remigius and others of the first See also:post-Conquest bishops have left a good name behind them. The condition of the church alike in the matter of spiritual zeal, of hard work and of learning was much improved. But there was a danger behind this revival; for the reformers of the rrth century, in their zeal for establishing the Kingdom of See also:God on See also:earth, were not content with raising the moral and intellectual See also:standards prevailing in Christendom, but sought to bring the whole scheme of life under the church, by asserting the See also:absolute supremacy of the spiritual over the temporal power, wherever the two came in contact or overlapped. The result, since the feudal and ecclesiastical systems had become closely interwoven, and the frontier between the religious and secular See also:spheres must ever be vague and undefined, was the conflict between the spiritual and temporal powers which, for two centuries to come, was to See also:tear Europe into warring factions (see the articles CHURCH HISTORY; PAPACY; See also:INVESTITURE). The Norman Conquest of England was contemporaneous with the supreme influence of the greatest exponent of the theory of ecclesiastical supremacy, the See also:archdeacon See also:Hildebrand, who in 1073 mounted the papal throne as Gregory VII. (q.v.). William, despite all his personal faults, was a sincerely pious man, but it could not be expected that he would acquiesce in these new developments of the religious See also:reformation which he had done his best to forward. Hence we find a divided purpose in the policy which he pursued with regard to church affairs.

He endeavoured to keep on the best terms with the papacy: he welcomed legates and frequently consulted the pope on purely spiritual matters. He even took the hazardous step of separating ecclesiastical courts and lay courts, giving the church leave to establish See also:

separate tribunals of her own, a right which she had never possessed in Saxon England. The spiritual jurisdiction of the bishop had hitherto been exercised in the ordinary national courts, with lay assessors frequently taking part in the proceedings, and mixing their dooms with the See also:clergy's canonical decisions. William in Io76 granted the church a completely independent set of courts, a step which his successors were to regret for many a generation. At the same time, however, he was not See also:blind to the possibilities of papal interference in domestic matters, and of the danger of conflict between the crown and the recently-strengthened clerical order. To guard against them he laid down three general rules: (r) that no one should be recognized as pope in England till he had himself taken See also:cognizance of the papal election, and that no papal letters should be brought into the realm without his leave; (2) that no decisions of the English ecclesiastical synods should be held valid till he had examined and sanctioned them; (3) that none of his barons or ministers should beexcommunicated unless he approved of such See also:punishment beinginflicted on them. These rules seem to argue a deeply rooted distrust of the possible encroachments of the papacy on the power of the state. The question of ecclesiastic patronage; which was to'be the source of the first great quarrel between the crown and the church in the next generation, is not touched upon. William retained in his own hands the choice of bishops and abbots, and Alexander II. and Gregory VII. seem to have made no objection to his doing so, in spite of the claim that free election was the only canonical way of filling vacancies. The Conqueror was allowed for his lifetime to do as he pleased, since he was recognized as a true friend of the church. But the question was only deferred and not settled. The political history of William's later years is unimportant; his main energy was absorbed in the task of holding down and organizing his new kingdom.

His rather precarious conquest of the See also:

county of See also:Maine, his long quarrels '1111sm's. with See also:Philip I. of France, who suborned against him his :ego. undutiful and rebellious eldest son Robert, his negotiation with Flanders and Germany, deserve no more than a mention. It is more necessary to point out that he reasserted on at least one occasion (when King Malcolm Canmore did him homage) the old See also:suzerainty of the English kings over Scotland. He also began that encroachment on the See also:borders of Wales which was to continue with small interruptions for the next two centuries. The advance was begun by his great vassals, the earls of Chester, Shrewsbury and See also:Hereford, all of whom occupied new districts on the edge of the mountains of Powys and Gwynedd. William himself led an expedition as far as St. Davids in io81, and founded See also:Cardiff See also:Castle to mark the boundary of his realm north of the See also:Bristol Channel. Perhaps the most noteworthy event of the second portion of the Conqueror's reign was a rebellion which, though it made no head and was easily suppressed, marks the commencement of that feudal danger which was to be the constant trouble of the English kings for the next three generations. Two of the greatest of his foreign magnates, See also:Roger, earl of Hereford, and See also:Ralph, earl of See also:Norfolk, rose against him in 1075, with no better cause than personal grievances and ambitions. He put them down with ease; the one was imprisoned for life, the other driven into exile, while See also:Waltheof, the last of the English earls, who had dabbled in a' hesitating way in this See also:plot, was executed. There was never any serious danger, but the fact that under the new regime baronial rebellion was possible, despite of all William's advantages over other feudal kings, and despite of the fact that the rebels were hardly yet settled firmly into their new estates, had a sinister import for the future of England. With the new monarchy there had come into England the anarchic spirit of continental feudalism. If such a man as the Conqueror did not overawe it, what was to be expected in the reigns of his successors?

William had introduced into his new realm alike the barons, with their personal ambition, and the clerics of the school of Hildebrand, with their intense jealousy for the rights of the church. The See also:

tale of. the dealings of his descendants with these two classes of opponents constitutes the greater part of English history for a full century. William died at Rouen on the 7th of September ro87; on his death-See also:bed he expressed his wish that Normandy should pass to his elder son, Robert, in spite of all his rebellions, but gave his second son William (known by the nick- See also:Rufus. Wu%as.' name of Rufus) the crown of England, and sent him thither with commendatory letters to archbishop Lanfranc and his other ministers. There was at first no sign of opposition to the will of the late king, and William Rufus was crowned within three weeks of his father's decease. But the results of the Conquest had made it hard to tear England and Normandy apart. Almost every baron in the duchy was now the possessor of a smaller or a greater See also:grant of lands in the kingdom, and the possibility of serving two masters was as small in Io87 as at any other period of the world's history. By dividing his two states between his sons the Conqueror undid his own work, and left to his subjects the certainty of civil war. For the brothers Robert and William were, and always had been, enemies, and every intriguing baron had before him the tempting prospect of aggrandizing himself, by making his See also:allegiance to one of the brothers serve as an excuse for betraying the other. Robert was thriftless, volatile and easy-going, a good knight but a most in-competent sovereign. These very facts commended him to the more turbulent section of the baronage; if he succeeded to the whole of the Conqueror's heritage they would have every opportunity of enjoying freedom from all governance. William's private character was detestable: he was cruel, lascivious, greedy of gain, a habitual breaker of oaths and promises, ungrateful and irreligious.

But he was cunning, strong-handed and energetic; clearly the "Red King" would be an undesirable master to those who loved feudal anarchy. Hence every turbulent baron in England soon came to the conclusion that Robert was the sovereign whom his heart desired. The greater part of the reign of William II. was taken up with his fight against the feudal danger. Before he had been six months on the throne he was attacked by a league comprising more than half the baronage, and headed by his uncles, bishop See also:

Odo of See also:Bayeux and. Robert of See also:Mortain. They used the name of the duke of Normandy and had secured his promise to cross the Channel for their assistance. A less capable and unscrupulous king than Rufus might have been swept away, for the rising burst out simultaneously in nearly every corner of the realm. But he made head against it with the aid of See also:mercenary bands, the loyal minority of the barons, and the shire-levies of his English subjects. When he summoned out the fyrd they came in great force to his aid, not so much because they trusted in the promises of good governance and reduced taxation which he made, but because they saw that a horde of greedy barons would be worse to serve than a single king, however hard and selfish he might be. With their assistance William fought down the rebels, expelled his uncle Odo and several other leaders from the realm, confiscated a certain amount of estates, and then pardoned the remainder of the rebels. Such See also:mercy, as he was to discover, was misplaced. In 1095 the same body of barons made a second and a more formidable rising, headed by the earls of Shrewsbury, Eu and See also:Northumberland.

It was put down with the same decisive energy that William had shown in 1088, and this time he was merciless; he blinded and mutilated William of Ett, shut up See also:

Mowbray of Northumberland for life in a monastery, and hanged many men of lesser See also:rank. Of the other rebels some were deprived of their English estates altogether, See also:ethers restored to part of them after paying crushing fines. This second feudal rebellion was only a See also:distraction to William from his war with his brother Robert, which continued intermittently all through the earlier years of his reign. It was raging from ro88 to 1091, and again from 1093 to 1096, when Robert tired of the losing game, pawned his duchy to his brother and went off on the First Crusade. Down to this moment William's position had been somewhat precarious; with the Norman war generally on hand, feudal rebellion always imminent, and Scottish invasions occasionally to be repelled, he had no easy life. But he fought through his troubles, conquered See also:Cumberland from the Scots (1092), in dealing with his domestic enemies used cunning where force failed, and generally got his will in the end. His rule was expensive, and he made himself hated by every class of his subjects, baronage, clergy and people alike, by his ingenious and oppressive taxation. His chosen See also:instrument, a clerical lawyer named Ranulf See also:Flambard (q.v.), whom he presently made bishop of See also:Durham, was shameless in his methods of twisting feudal or national law to the detriment of the taxpayer. William sup-ported him in every device, however unjust, with a cynical frankness which was the distinguishing trait of his character; for he loved to display openly all the vices and meannesses which most men take care to disguise. In dealing with the baronage Ranulf and his master extorted excessive and arbitrary "reliefs" when-ever land passed in See also:succession to heirs. When the church was a landholder their conduct was even more unwarrantable; every clerk installed in a new preferment was forced to pay a large sum down—which in that age was considered a clear case of simony by all conscientious men. But-in addition the king keptall wealthy. posts, such as bishoprics and abbacies, vacant for years at a time and appropriated the revenue meanwhile.

This policy, when pursued with regard to the archbishopric of Canterbury, brought on Rufus the most troublesome of his quarrels. When the wise See also:

primate Lanfranc, his father's friend, died in 1089, he made no See also:appointment See also:Anselm. till ro93, extracting meanwhile great plunder from the see. In a moment of sickness, when his See also:conscience was for a space trouba See also:ling him or his will was weak, he nominated the saintly Anselm (q.v.) to the archbishopric. When enthroned the new primate refused to make the enormous gift which the king expected from every recipient of preferment. Soon after he began to See also:press for leave to hold a national synod, and when it was denied him, spoke out boldly on the personal vices as well as the immoral policy of the king. From this time William and Anselm became open enemies. They fought first upon the question of acknowledging See also:Urban II. as pope-for the king, taking advantage of the fact that there was an antipope in existence, refused to allow that there was any certain and, legitimate head of the Western church at the moment. Then, after William had reluctantly yielded on this point, the far more important question of lay investitures cropped up. The See also:council of Clermont (Nov. 1095) had just issued its famous See also:decree to the effect that bishops must be chosen by free election, and not invested with their spiritual insignia or enfeoffed with their estates by the hands of a secular prince; Anselm felt himself obliged to accept this decision, and refused to accept his own See also:pallium from William when Urban sent it across the sea by the hands of a See also:legate. The king replied by harrying him on charges of having failed in his feudal obligation to provide well-equipped knights for a Welsh expedition, and imposed ruinous fines on him. It was even said that his life was threatened, and he fled to Rome in 1097, not to return till his adversary was dead.

There was much to be said for the theory of the king as to the relations between church and state; he was indeed only carrying on in a harsh See also:

form his father's old policy. But the fact that he was a See also:tyrant and an evil-See also:liver, while Anselm was a See also:saint, so much influenced public See also:opinion that William was universally regarded as in the wrong, and the sympathy of the laity no less than the clergy was with the archbishop. For the remaining three years of his life the Red King was considered to be in a state of reprobation and at open strife with righteousness. Yet so far as secular affairs went William seemed prosperous enough. Since his brother had pawned the duchy of Normandy to him, so that he reigned at Rouen no less than at London, the danger of rebellion was almost removed. His foreign policy was successful: he installed a nominee of his own, Edgar, the son of Malcolm Canmore, on the throne of Scotland (1097) ; he reconquered Maine, which his brother Robert had lost; he made successful war upon King Philip of France. His barons subdued much of South Wales, though his own expeditions into North Wales, which he had designed to conquer and annex, had a less fortunate ending. He dreamed, we are told, of attacking Ireland, even of crowning himself king at See also:Paris. But on the 2nd of See also:August 1100 he was suddenly cut off in the midst of his sins. While See also:hunting with some of his godless companions in the New See also:Forest, he was struck by an arrow, unskilfully shot by one of the party. The knight See also:Walter See also:Tyrrell, who was persistently accused of being the author of his master's death, as persistently denied his responsibility for it; and whether the arrow was his or no, it was not alleged that malice guided it. William's favourites had all to lose by his death.

The king's death was unexpected: he was only in his fortieth year, and men's minds had not even begun to ponder over the question of who would succeed him. The crown of England was left vacant for the boldest kinsman to succHenry ofenry 1. snatch at, if he dared. William had two surviving brothers, beside several nephews. Robert's claim seemed the more likely to succeed, for not only was he the elder, but England was full of barons who desired his accession, and had already taken up arms for him in 1087 or 1095. But he was far away—being at the moment on his return See also:

journey from Jerusalem—while on the spot was his brother See also:Henry, an ambitious prince, whose previous efforts to secure himself a territorial endowment had failed more from ill-luck than from want of enterprise or ability. Seeing his opportunity, Henry left his brother's body unburied, rode straight off to Winchester with a handful of companions, and seized the royal treasure. This and his ready tongue were the main arguments by which he convinced the few magnates See also:present, and persuaded them to back him, despite the protests of some supporters of Robert. There was hardly the semblance of an election, and the earl of Warwick and the See also:chancellor William See also:Giffard were almost the only persons of importance on the spot. But Henry, once hailed as king, rode hard for London and persuaded bishop See also:Maurice to crown him without delay at Westminster, since the primate Anselm was absent beyond seas. He certainly lost no time: Rufus was shot on See also:Thursday, the 2nd of August—his successor was crowned on See also:Sunday the 5th of August! The realm heard almost by the same messengers that it had lost one king and that it had gained another.

Henry at once issued a See also:

proclamation and See also:charter promising the redress of all the grievances with which his brother had afflicted his feudal tenants, the clergy and the whole nation. He would keep the ancient laws of King Edward, as amended by his father the Conqueror, and give all men good justice. These promises he observed more faithfully than Norman kings were wont to do; if the pledge was not redeemed in every detail, he yet kept England free from anarchy, abandoned the arbitrary and unjust taxation of his brother, and set up a government that worked by rule and order, not by the fits and starts of tyrannical caprice. He was a man of a See also:cold and hard disposition, but full of See also:practical wisdom, and conscious that his precarious claim to the crown must be secured by winning the confidence of his subjects. Almost the first and quite the wisest of his inspirations was to wed a princess of the old English line—Edith,' the niece of Edgar See also:iEtheling, the child of his sister See also:Margaret of Scotland and Malcolm Canmore. The match, though his Norman barons sneered at it, gave him the See also:hearts of all his English subjects, who supported him with enthusiasm, and not merely (as had been the case with Rufus) because they saw that a strong king would oppress them less than a factious and turbulent baronage. Henry won much See also:applause at the same time by filling up all the bishoprics and abbacies which his brother had kept so long vacant, by inviting the exiled Anselm to return to England, and by imprisoning William's odious minister Ranulf Flambard. He had just time to create a favourable impression by his first proceedings, when his brother Robert, who had returned from See also:Palestine and resumed possession of Normandy, landed at Ports-mouth to claim the crown and to rouse his partisans among the English baronage. Henry bought him off, before the would-be rebels had time to join him, by promising him an See also:annual tribute of 3000 marks and surrendering to him all his estates in Normandy (See also:Ito'). His policy seemed tame and cautious, but was entirely justifiable, for within a few months of Robert's departure the inevitable feudal rebellion broke out. If the duke and his army had been on the spot to support it, things might have gone hardly with the king. The rising was led by Robert of See also:Belesme, earl of Shrewsbury, a petty tyrant of the most ruffianly type, the terror of the Welsh See also:marches.

He was backed by his kinsmen and many other barons, but proved unable to stand before the king, who was loyally supported by the English shire levies. After taking the strong castles of See also:

Arundel, Tickhill, See also:Bridgnorth and Shrewsbury, Henry forced the rebels to submit. He confiscated their estates and drove them out of the realm; they fled for the most part to Normandy, to See also:spur on duke Robert to make another bid for the English crown. From the broad lands which they forfeited Henry made haste to See also:reward his own servants, new men who owed all to him and served him faithfully. From them he chose the sheriffs, castellans and councillors through whom he administered the realm during the rest of his long reign. ' As the name Edith (Eadgyth) sounded uncouth to Norman ears, she assumed the continental name Maheut or Mahelt (Eng. Mahald, later See also:Mold and Maud), in Latin Matildis or See also:Matilda. See also:Sir J. H. See also:Ramsay, See also:Foundations of England, ii. 235. (Ed.) This minor See also:official See also:nobility was the strength of the crown, and was sharply divided in spirit and ambition from the older feudal See also:aristocracy which descended from the original adventurers who had followed William the Conqueror.

Yet the latter still remained strong enough to constitute a danger to the crown when-ever it should fall to a king less wary and resolute than Henry himself. Henry was by nature more of an administrator and organizer than of a fighting man. He was a competent soldier, but his wish was rather to be a strong king at home than a great conqueror abroad. Nevertheless he was driven by the See also:

logic of events to attack Normandy, for as long as his brother reigned there, and as long as many English barons retained great holdings on both sides of the Channel and were subjects of the duke as well as of the king, intrigues and plots never ceased. The Norman war ended in the battle of Tenchebrai (Sept. 28, rio6), where Duke Robert was taken prisoner. His brother shut him up in honourable confinement for the rest of his life, though other-wise he was not ill-treated. For the rest of his reign Henry was ruler of all the old dominions of the Conqueror, and none of his subjects could cloak disloyalty by the pretence of owing a divided allegiance to two masters. With this he was content, and made no great effort to extend his dominions farther; his desirewastoreignas a true king in EnglandandNormandy, rather than to build up a loosely compacted empire around them. Throughout the time of Henry's Norman war, he was engaged in a tiresome controversy with the primate on the question of lay investitures, the continuation of the struggle which Henry's had begun in his brother's reign. Every English king difficulties for five generations had to face the danger from the with the church, no less than the danger from the barons. church. Anselm had come back from Rome confirmed in the theories for which he had contended with Rufus—nay, taught to extend them to a further extreme.

He now maintained not only that it was a See also:

sin that kings should invest prelates with their spiritual insignia, the pallium, the See also:staff, the See also:ring, but claimed that no clerk ought to do homage to the king for the lands of his See also:benefice, though he himself seven years before had not scrupled to make his oath to his earlier master. He now refused to swear allegiance to the new monarch, though he had recalled him and had restored him to the possession of his see. He also refused to consecrate Henry's nominees to certain bishoprics and abbacies on the ground that they had not been chosen by free election by their chapters or their monks. The king was loath to take up the quarrel, for he highly respected the archbishop; yet he was still more loath to surrender the ancient claims and privileges of the crown. Anselm was equally reluctant to force matters to an open See also:breach, yet would not shift from his position. There followed an interminable series of arguments, interrupted by truces, till at last Anselm, at the king's See also:suggestion, went to Rome to see if the pope could arrange some modus vivendi. See also:Paschal II. for some time refused to withdraw from his fixed theory of the relation of church and state, and Anselm, in despair, preferred to remain abroad rather than to press matters to the rupture that seemed the only logical issue of the controversy. But in 1107 the pope consented to a See also:compromise, which satisfied the king, and yet was acceptable to the church. Bishops and abbots were for the future to be canonically elected by the clergy, and were no longer to receive the ring and staff from lay hands. But they were to do homage to the king for their lands, and since they thus acknowledged him as their temporal lord Henry was content. Moreover, he retained in practice, if not in theory, his power to nominate to the vacant offices; chapters and monasteries seldom dared to resist the pressure which the sovereign could bring to See also:bear upon them in favour of the See also:candidate whom he had selected. The arrangement was satisfactory, and served as the See also:model for the similar compromise arrived at between Pope See also:Calixtus II. and the emperor Henry V. fifteen years later.

From 1107 onward Henry was freed from both the dangers which had threatened him in his earlier years, and was free to develop his policy as he pleased. He had yet twenty-eight years to reign, for he survived to the age of sixty-seven, an age unparalleled by any of his predecessors, and by all his successors till Edward I. It is to Henry, aided by his great See also:

justiciar, Roger, bishop of See also:Salisbury, that England owed the institution of the machinery of government by which it was to be ruled during the Canstftn- earlier middle ages. This may be described as a primi-See also:Eland machinery. tive kind of bureaucracy, which gradually developed mac into a much more complicated system of courts and offices. Around the sovereign was his See also:Curia Regis or body of councillors, of whom the most important were the justiciar, the chancellor and the treasurer, though the feudal officers, the See also:constable and See also:marshal, were also to be found there. The bulk of the council, however, was composed of knights and clerks selected by the king for their administrative or See also:financial ability. The Curia, besides advising the king on ordinary matters of state, had two special functions. It sat, or certain members of it sat, under the See also:presidency of the king or the justiciar, as the supreme court of justice of the realm. In this capacity it tried the suits of tenants-in-chief, and all appeals from the local courts. But Henry, not contented with this, adopted the custom of sending forth certain members of the Curia throughout the realm at intervals, to sit in the shire court, along with or in place of the sheriff, and to hear and See also:judge all the cases of which the court had cognizance. From these itinerant commissioners (justices in See also:eyre) descend the See also:modern justices of See also:assize. The sheriff, the original See also:president of the shire court, was gradually extruded by them from all important business.

But there were other developments of the Curia. The justiciar, chancellor and treasurer sat with certain other members of the council as the court of See also:

exchequer, not only to receive and See also:audit the accounts of the royal revenue, but to give legal decisions on all questions connected with See also:finance. Twice in every year the sheriffs and other royal officials came up to the exchequer court, which originally sat at Winchester, with their bags of See also:money and their sheaves of accounts. Their figures were subjected to a severe See also:scrutiny, and the law was laid down on all points in which the interests of the sheriff and the king, or the sheriff and the taxpayer, came into conflict. In this way the exchequer grew into a law court of See also:primary importance, instead of remaining merely a court of See also:receipt. Though its members were originally the same men who sat in the Curia Regis, the character of the question to be tried settled the capacity in which they should sit, and two separate courts were evolved. (See EXCHEQUER.) Under the superintendence of the Curia Regis and the ex-chequer, the sheriff still remained the king's factotum in local affairs. He led the shire-levies, collected the royal revenues both feudal and non-feudal, and presided in the shire-court as judge, till in the course of years his functions in that sphere were gradually taken over by the itinerant justices. On his fidelity the king had to rely both for military aid in times of baronial revolt and for the collection of the money which formed the sinews of war. Hence the position was one of the highest importance, and Henry's new nobility, the men of ability whom he selected and promoted, found their special occupation in holding the office of sheriff. It was they who had to see that the shire court, and in minor affairs the hundred court, did not allow cases to slip away into the jurisdiction of the feudal courts of the baronage. Henry I. must See also:count not merely as the father of the English bureaucracy, but as a fosterer of the municipal independence of the towns.

He gave charters of a very liberal character to many places, and in especial to London, where the citizens were allowed to choose their own sheriff, and to See also:

deal directly with the ex-chequer in matters of revenue. He even farmed out to them the See also:charge of the taxes of the whole shire of Middlesex, outside the See also:city walls. Such a grant was exceptional—though Lincoln also seems to have been granted the See also:privilege of dealing directly with the exchequer. But in many other smaller towns the first grants —the smaller beginnings of autonomy—may be traced back to this period (see See also:BoRoUGH). Though Henry was an autocrat, and governed throughbureaucratic officials who were entirely under his hand, yet a reign of law and order such as his was indirectly favourable to the growth of constitutional See also:liberty. It was equally favourable to the growth of national unity: it was in his time that Norman and English began to melt together: intermarriage in all classes became common, and only thirty years after his death a con-temporary writer could remark that it was hard for any man to call himself either Norman or English, so much had blood been intermingled. It is unnecessary to go into the very uninteresting and unimportant history of Henry's later years. A long war with France, prosecuted without much energy, led to no results, for the French king's attempts to stir up rebellions in the name of William the Clito (q.v.), the son of Duke Robert, came to an end with that prince's death in 1129. But the extension of the English borders in South Wales by the conquests of the lords marcher as far as See also:Pembroke and See also:Cardigan deserves a word of See also:notice. The question of the succession was the main thing which occupied the mind of the king and the whole nation in Henry's later years. It had a real See also:interest for every man in an age when any doubt as to the heir meant the out- Henry's heit, break of civil war such as had occurred at the death of the Conqueror and of Rufus. There was now a problem of some difficulty to be solved.

Henry's only son William had been drowned at sea in 1120. He had no other child See also:

born in wedlock save a daughter, Matilda, who married the emperor Henry V., but had no issue by him. On the emperor's decease she wedded as her second husband See also:Geoffrey of See also:Anjou (1127), to whom during her father's last years she bore two sons. But the succession of a woman to the crown was as unfamiliar to English as to Norman ideas, nor did it seem natural to either to place a young child on the throne. Moreover, Matilda's husband Geoffrey was unpopular among the Normans; the Angevins had been the chief enemies of the duchy for several generations, and the idea that one of them might become its practical ruler was deeply resented. The old king, as was but natural, had determined that his daughter should be his successor; he made the great council do homage to her in 1126, and always kept her before the eyes of his people as his destined heir. But though he had forced or cajoled every leading man in England and Normandy to take his oath to serve her, he must have been conscious that there was a large chance that such pledges would be forgotten at his death.. The See also:prejudice against a See also:female heir was strong, and there were too many turbulent magnates to whom the anarchy that would follow a disputed succession presented temptations which could not be resisted. Henry died suddenly on the 25th of See also:November 1135, while he was on a visit to his duchy of Normandy. The moment that his death was reported the futility of oaths became apparent. A majority of the Norman barons ap- Mand atttda, pealed to See also:Theobald, count of See also:Blois, son of the Con- See also:Stephen. queror's daughter Adela, to be their duke, and to save them from the yoke of the hated Angevin. His supporters and those of Matilda were soon at blows all along the frontier of Normandy.

Meanwhile in England another pretender had appeared. Stephen, count of See also:

Boulogne, the younger brother of Theobald, had landed at Dover within a few days of Henry's death, determined to make a snatch at the crown, though he had been one of the first who had taken the oath to his cousin a few years before. The citizens of London welcomed him, but he was not secure of his success till by a See also:swift swoop on Winchester he obtained possession of the royal treasure—an all-important factor in a crisis, as Henry I. had shown in 1100. At Winchester he was acknowledged as king by the bishop, his own brother Henry of Blois, and by the great justiciar, Roger, bishop of Salisbury, and the archbishop, William of See also:Corbeil. The allegiance of these prelates was bought by an unwise promise to grant all the demands of the church party, which his predecessor had denied, or conceded only in part. He would permit free election to all benefices, and free legislation by ecclesiastical synods, and would surrender any claims of the royal courts to have jurisdiction over clerks or the property of clerks. It then remained necessary to buy the baronage, of which only a few members had as yet committed themselves to his side. It was done by grants of lands and privileges, the first See also:instalment of a never-ending See also:crop of ruinous concessions which Stephen continued to make from the day of his accession down to the day of his death. The pretender was crowned at Westminster on the 22nd of See also:December 1135—less than a month after his uncle's death. No one yet openly withstood him, but he was well aware that his position was precarious, and that the claims of Matilda would he brought forward ere long by the section of the baronage which had not yet got from him all they desired. Meanwhile, however, he was encouraged to persevere by the fact that his brother Theobald had withdrawn his claim to the duchy of Normandy, and retired in his favour. For a space he was to be duke as well as king; but this meant merely that he would have two wars, not one, in hand ere long.

Matilda's adherents were already in the field in Normandy; in England their rising was only delayed for a few months. Stephen, though he had shown some enterprise and capacity in his successful snatch at the crown, was a man far below his three predecessors on the throne in the matter of perseverance and foresight. He was a good fighter, a liberal giver, and a faithful friend, but he lacked wisdom, caution and the power to organize. Starting his career as a perjurer, it is curious that he was singularly slow to suspect See also:

perjury in others; he was the most systematically betrayed of all English kings, because he was the least suspicious, and the most ready to buy off and to forgive rebels. His troubles began in 1136, when. sporadic rebellions, raised in the name of Matilda, began to appear; they grew steadily worse, though Stephen showed no lack of energy, posting about his realm with a band of mercenary knights whenever trouble broke out. But in 1138 the crisis came; the baronage had tried the capacity of their new master and found him wanting. The outbreak was now widespread and systematic OW/ war. —caused not by the turbulence of a few See also:wild See also:spirits, but by the deliberate See also:conspiracy of all who saw their advantage in anarchy. Matilda had a few genuine partisans, such as her half-brother Robert, earl of Gloucester, the illegitimate son of Henry I., brit the large majority of those who took arms in her name were ready to sell their allegiance to either candidate in return for lands, or grants of rank or privilege. A long list of doubly and triply forsworn nobles, led by Geoffrey de See also:Mandeville, See also:Aubrey de See also:Vere and Ralph of Chester, made the See also:balance of war sway alternately from side to side, as they transferred themselves to the camp of the highest See also:bidder. It is hard to trace any meaning in the civil war—it was not a contest between the principle of hereditary succession and the principle of elective kingship, as might be supposed. It was rather, if some explanation must be found for it, a strife between the kingly power and feudal anarchy.

Unfortunately for England the kingly power was in the hands of an incapable holder, and feudal anarchy found a plausible See also:

mask by adopting the disguise of loyalty to the rightful heiress. The civil war was not Stephen's only trouble; foreign invasion was added. See also:David I., king of Scotland, was the uncle of Matilda, and used her wrongs as the plea for thrice invading northern England, which he ravaged with great cruelty. His most formidable raid was checked by the Yorkshire shire levies, at the battle of the See also:Standard (Aug. 22, 1138). Yet in the following year he had to be bought off by the grant of all Northumberland (save See also:Newcastle and Bamborough) to his son Earl Henry. See also:Car-See also:lisle and Cumberland were already in his hands. Some years later the Scottish prince also got possession of the great " Honour of See also:Lancaster." It was not Stephen's fault that the boundary of England did not permanently recede from the Tweed and the Solway to the See also:Tyne and the Ribble. But the affairs of the North attracted little attention while the civil war was at its height in the South. In 1139 Stephen had wrought himself fatal damage by quarrelling with the ecclesiastical bureaucrats, the kinsmen and See also:allies of Roger of Salisbury,who had been among his earliest adherents. Jealous of their, power and their arrogance, and doubting their loyalty, he imprisoned them ; and confiscated their lands. This threw the whole church party on to the side of Matilda; even Henry, bishop of Winchester, the king's own brother, disowned him and passed over to the other side.

Moreover, the whole machinery of local government in the realm fell out of See also:

gear, when the experienced ministers who were wont to See also:control it were removed from power. Matilda had landed in England in the winter of 1139–1140; for a year her partisans made steady progress against the king, and on the 2nd of February 1141 Stephen was defeated and taken. prisoner at the battle of Lincoln. All England, save the county of Kent and a few isolated castles elsewhere, submitted to, Matilda. She was hailed as a sovereign by a great See also:assembly at Winchester, over which Stephen's own brother Bishop Henry presided (See also:April 7, 1141) and entered London in triumph in See also:June. It is doubtful whether she would have obtained complete possession of the realm if she had played her See also:cards well, for there were too many powerful personages who were interested in the perpetuation of the civil war. But she certainly did her best to ruin her own chances by showing an unwise arrogance, and a determination to resume at once all the powers that her father had possessed. When she annulled all the royal acts of the last six years, declared charters forfeited and lands confiscated, and began to raise heavy and arbitrary taxes, she made the partisans of Stephen desperate, and estranged many of her own supporters. A sudden rising of the citizens drove her out of London, while she was making preparations for her See also:coronation. The party of the imprisoned king rallied under the wise guidance of his wife Matilda of Boulogne and his brother Henry, and many other of the late deserters adhered to it. Their army drove the lately triumphant party out of Winchester, and captured its military chief, Robert, earl of Gloucester. So much was his loss felt that his sister exchanged him a few months later for King Stephen. . After this the war went on interminably, without complete advantage to either side, Stephen for the most part dominating the eastern and Matilda the western shires.

It was the See also:

zenith of the power of the baronial anarchists, who moved from camp to camp with shameless rapidity, wresting from one or other of the two rival sovereigns some royal castle, or some dangerous grant of financial or judicial rights, at each change of allegiance. The kingdom was in the desperate state described in the last See also:melancholy pages of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, when life and property were nowhere safe from the objectless ferocity of feudal tyrants —when " every shire was full of castles and every castle filled with devils and evil men," and the people murmured that " See also:Christ and his See also:saints slept." Such was England's fate till 1153, when Matilda had retired from the strife in favour of her son, Henry of Anjou, and Stephen was grown an old man, and had just lost his heir, Eustace, to whom he had desired to pass on the crown. Both parties were exhausted, both were sick of the incessant treachery of their more unscrupulous barons, and at last they came to the compromise of See also:Wallingford (October 1153), by which it was agreed that Stephen should reign for the remainder of his life, but that on his death the crown should pass to Henry. Both sides promised to lay down their arms, to dismiss their mercenaries, and to acquiesce in the destruction of unlicensed castles, of which it is said, with no very great exaggeration, that there were at the moment over x000 in the realm. Henry then returned to Normandy, of which his mother had been in possession since 1145, while Stephen turned his small remaining strength to the weary task of endeavouring to restore the foundations of law and order. But he had accomplished little when he died in October 1154. The task of reconstruction was to be left to Henry of Anjou: his predecessor was only remembered as an example of the evil that may be done by a weak man who has been reckless enough to seize a throne which he is incapable of defending. England has had many worse kings, but never one who wrought her more harm. If his successor had been like him, feudal anarchy might have become as permanent in England as in See also:Poland. 1154-1162j Fortunately the young king to whom Stephen's battered crown now fell was energetic and capable, if somewhat self- Henry M willed and hasty. He was inferior in caution and self-control to his grandfather Henry I., though he resembled him in his love of strong and systematic governance. From the point of view of his English subJects his main achievement was that he restored in almost every detail the well-organized bureaucracy which his ancestor had created, and with it the law and order that had disappeared during Stephen's unhappy reign.

But there was this essential difference between the position of the two Henries, that the elder aspired to be no more than king of England and duke of Normandy, while the younger strove all his life for an imperial position in western Europe. Such an ambition was almost forced upon him by the consequences of his descent and his See also:

marriage. Besides his grandfather's Anglo-Norman See also:inheritance, he had received from his father Geoffrey the counties of Anjou and See also:Touraine, and the predominance in the valley of the Lower Loire. But it was his marriage to Eleanor of See also:Aquitaine, two years before his ac-cession to the English throne, which gave him the right to See also:dream of greatness such as his Norman forbears had never enjoyed. This See also:lady, the divorced wife of See also:Louis VII. of France, brought to her second husband the whole of the lands from See also:Poitou to the See also:Pyrenees, the accumulated gains of many warlike ancestors. In wealth and fighting strength the duchy of Aquitaine was a full third of France. Added to Anjou and Normandy it made a realm far more important than England. Hence it came that Henry's ambitions and interests were continental more than English. Unlike his grandfather he dwelt for the greater part of his time beyond seas. It must be remembered, too, that his youth had been spent abroad, and that England only came to him when he was already a grown man. The concerns of his island realm were a matter of high importance to him, but only formed a part of his cares. Essentially he was an Angevin, neither a Norman nor an Englishman, and his primary ambition was to make the house of Anjou supreme in France.

Nor did this seem impossible; he owned a far broader and wealthier domain beyond the Channel than did his nominal suzerain King Louis VII., and—what was of more importance—he far excelled that prince both in vigour and in capacity.. On succeeding to the English crown, however, he came over at once to take possession of the realm, and abode there for over a year, displaying the most restless energy in setting to rights the governance of the realm. He expelled all Stephen's mercenaries, took back into his hands the royal lands and castles which his predecessor had granted away, and destroyed hundreds of the " adulterine " castles which the barons and knights had built without leave during the years of the anarchy. Hardly a single magnate dared to oppose him—Bridgnorth, now a castle of the Mortimers, was the only place which he had to take by force. His next care was to restore the bureaucracy by which Henry I. had been wont to govern. He handed over the exchequer to See also:

Nigel, bishop of Ely, the nephew of the old justiciar Roger of Salisbury, and the heir of his traditions. His chancellor was a young clerk, See also:Thomas See also:Becket, who was recommended to him by archbishop Theobald as the most capable official in the realm. A short experience of his work convinced the king that his merits had not been exaggerated. He proved a zealous and capable minister, and such a strong exponent of the claims of the crown that no one could have foreseen the later developments by which he was to become their greatest enemy. The See also:machine of government was beginning to work in a satis-4actory fashion, and the realm was already settling down into order, when Henry was called abroad by a rebellion raised in Anjou by his brother Geoffrey—the first of the innumerable dynastic troubles abroad which continued throughout his reign to distract his attention from his duties as an English king. He did not return for fifteen months; but when he did reappear it was to complete the work which he had begun in 1155, to extort from the greater barons the last of the royal fortresses which still remained in their hands, and to restore the northern boundaries of the realm. Malcolm IV., the young king of Scotland, ix.

16481 was compelled to give up the earldoms of Northumberland and Cumberland, which his father Henry had received from Stephen. He received instead only the earldom of See also:

Huntingdon, too far from the border to be a dangerous possession, to which he had a hereditary right as descending from Earl Waltheof. He did homage to the king of England, and actually followed him with a great See also:retinue on his next continental expedition. In the same year (1157) Henry made an expedition into North Wales, and forced its prince See also:Owen to become his See also:vassal, not without some fighting, in which the English army received several See also:sharp checks at the commencement of the campaign. Yet once more Henry's stay on the English side of the Channel was but for a year. In 1158 he again departed to plunge into schemes of continental conquest. This time it was an attempt to annex the great county of See also:Toulouse, and so to carry the borders of Aquitaine to the Mediterranean, which distracted him. Naturally Louis of France was unwilling to see his great vassal striding all across his realm, and did what he could to hinder him. Into the endless skirmishes and negotiations which followed the raising of the question of Toulouse it would be fruit-less to enter. Henry did not achieve his purpose, indeed he seems to have failed to use his strength to its best advantage, and allowed himself to be bought off by a futile marriage treaty by which his eldest son was to marry the French king's daughter (s 16o). This was to be but the first of many disappointments in this direction; there was apparently some fatal See also:scruple, both in Henry's own mind and in that of his continental subjects, as to pressing their suzerain too hard. But it must also be remembered that a feudal army was an inefficient weapon for long wars, and that the mercenaries, by whom alone it could be replaced, were both expensive and untrustworthy.

Henry developed as far as he was able the system of " See also:

scutage " (q.v.) which his grandfather had apparently invented; by this the vassal compounded for his forty days' personal service by paying money, with which the king could hire professional soldiers. But even with this help he could never keep a large enough army together. Meanwhile England, though somewhat heavily taxed, was at least enjoying quiet and strong governance. There is every sign that Henry's early years were a time of returning prosperity. But there was also much friction between Quarrel the crown and its subjects. The more turbulent part with the church. of the baronage, looking back to the boisterous times of Stephen with regret, was reserving itself for a favourable opportunity. The danger of feudal rebellion was not yet past, as was to be shown ten years later. The towns did not find Henry an easy master. He took away from London some of the exceptional privileges which his grandfather had granted, such as the free election of sheriffs of Middlesex, and the right of farming the shire at a fixed See also:rent. He asserted his power to raise tallages "—arbitrary taxation—from the citizens on occasion. Yet he left the foundations of municipal liberty untouched, and he was fairly liberal in granting charters which contained moderate privileges to smaller towns.

His most difficult task, however, was to come to a settlement with the Church. The lavish grants of Stephen had made an end of the old authority which the Conqueror and Henry I. had exercised over the clergy. Their successor was well aware of the fact, and was resolved to put back the See also:

clock, so far as it was in his power. It was not, however, on the old problems of free election, of lay investiture, that his quarrel with the clerical body broke out, but on the comparatively new question of the conflicting claims of ecclesiastical and secular courts. The separate tribunals of the church, whose erection William I. had favoured, had been developing in power ever since, and had begun to encroach on the sphere of the courts of the state. This was more than ever the case since Stephen had formally granted them jurisdiction over all suits concerning clerics and clerical property. During the first few years of his reign Henry had already been in collision with the ecclesiastical authorities over several such cases; he had chafed at seeing two clerks accused of See also:murder and See also:black-mailing claimed by and acquitted in the church courts; and II most of all at the frequency of unlicensed appeals to Rome—a flagrant breach of one of the three rules laid down by William the Conqueror. Being comparatively at leisure after the pacification with France, he resolved to turn his whole attention to the arrangement of a new modus vivendi with the church. As a preliminary move he appointed his able chancellor Thomas Becket to the archbishopric of Canterbury, which fell vacant in Becket. 1162. This was the greatest See also:mistake of his reign. Becket was one of those men who, without being either hypocrites or consciously ambitious, live only to magnify their office.

While chancellor he was the most zealous servant of the crown, and had seemed rather secular than clerical in his habits and his outlook on life. But no sooner had he been promoted to the archbishopric than he put away his former See also:

manners, became the most formal and austere of men, and set himself to be the champion of the church party in all its claims, reasonable or unreasonable, against the state. The king's astonishment was even greater than his indignation when he saw the late chancellor setting himself to oppose him in all things. Their first quarrel was about a proposed change in some details of taxation, which seems to have had no specially ecclesiastical bearing at all. But Becket vehemently opposed it, and got so much support when the great council met at See also:Woodstock that Henry withdrew his schemes. This was only a preliminary skirmish; the main battle opened in the following year, when the king, quite aware that he must for the future look on Thomas as his enemy, brought forward the famous Constitutions of See also:Clarendon, of which the main purport was to assert the jurisdiction of the state over clerical offenders by a rather complicated See also:procedure, while other clauses provided that appeals to Rome must not be made without the king's leave, that suits about land or the presentation to benefices, in which clerics were concerned, should be tried before the royal courts, and that bishops should not quit the realm unless they had obtained permission to do so from the king (see CLARENDON, CONSTITUTIONS OF). Some-what to the king's surprise, Becket yielded for a moment to his pressure, and declared his assent to the constitutions. But he had no sooner left the court than he proclaimed that he had grievously sinned in giving way, suspended himself from his archiepiscopal functions, and wrote to the pope to beg for See also:pardon and See also:absolution. He then made a clandestine attempt to escape from the realm, but was detected on the seashore and forced to return. Incensed with Becket for his repudiation of his original sub-mission, Henry proceeded to open a campaign of lawsuits against him, in order to force him to plead in secular courts. He also took the very mean step of declaring that he should call him to account for all the moneys that had passed through his hands when he was chancellor, though Becket had been given a quittance for them when he resigned the office more than two years before. The business came up at the council of See also:Northampton (October 1164), when the archbishop was tried for refusing to recognize the jurisdiction of the king's courts, and declared to have forfeited his movable goods.

The See also:

sentence was passed by the lay members of the Curia Regis alone, the bishops having been forbidden to sit, and threatened with See also:excommunication if they did so, by the accused primate. When Becket was visited by the justiciar who came to rehearse the See also:judgment, he started to his feet, refused to listen to a word, declared his repudiation of all lay courts and left the hall. That same See also:night he made a second attempt to escape from England and this time succeeded in getting off to Flanders. From thence he fled to the court of the pope, where he received less support than he had expected. Alexander III. privately approved of all that he had done, and regarded him as the champion of the Church, but he did not wish to quarrel with King Henry. He had lately been driven from Rome by the emperor See also:Frederick I., who had installed an antipope in his place, and had been forced to retire to France. If he sided with Becket and thundered against hispersecutor, there wassmalldoubt that the king of England would adhere to the See also:schism. Accordingly he endeavoured to temporize and to avoid a rupture, to the archbishop's great disgust. But since he also declared the Consti-tutions of Clarendon uncanonical and invalid, Henry was equally offended, and opened negotiations with the emperor and the anti-pope. This conduct forced Alexander's hand, and he gave Becket leave to excommunicate his enemies. The exile, who had taken See also:refuge in a French abbey, placed the justiciar and six other of the king's chief councillors under the See also:ban of the Church, and intimated that he should add Henry himself to the list unless he showed speedy signs of repentance (April 1166). Thus the quarrel had come to a head.

Church and State were at open war. Henry soon found that Becket's threats had more effect than he liked. Many of the English clergy were naturally on the side of the primate in a dispute which touched their loyalty to the Church and their class feeling. Several bishops declared to the king that, since his ministers had been duly ex-communicated, they did not see how they could avoid regarding them as men placed outside the See also:

pale of Christendom. Fortunately the pope interfered for a moment to lighten the friction; being threatened with a new invasion by the emperor Frederick, he suspended the sentences and sent legates to patch up a peace. They failed, for neither the king nor the archbishop would give way. At this juncture Henry was desirous of getting his eldest son and namesake crowned as his colleague, the best mode that he could devise for avoiding the dangers of a disputed succession at his death. He induced the archbishop of York, assisted by the bishops of London and Salisbury, to perform the ceremony. This was a clear invasion of the ancient rights of the primate, and Becket took it more to heart than any other of his grievances. Yet the next move in the struggle was a hollow reconciliation between the combatants—a most inexplicable act on both sides. The king offered to allow Becket to return from exile, and to restore him to his possessions, without exacting from him any promise of submission, or even a pledge that he would not reopen the dispute on his return. Apparently he had made a wrong See also:interpretation of the primate's See also:mental attitude, and thought him desirous of a truce, if not ready for a compromise.

He had wholly misjudged the situation; Becket made neither promises nor threats, but three weeks after he reached Canterbury publicly excommunicated the bishops of London and Salisbury for the part that they had taken in the coronation of the young king, and suspended from their functions the other prelates who had been present at the ceremony. He then proceeded to excommunicate a number of his minor lay enemies. The See also:

news was carried overseas to Henry, who was then in Normandy. It roused one of the fits of wild rage to which he was not unfrequently liable; he burst out into ejaculations of wrath, and cursed " the cowardly idle See also:ser- m Becket' urders vants who suffered their master to be made the laughing-stock of a low-born See also:priest." Among those who stood about him were four knights, some of whom had personal grudges against Becket, and all of whom were reckless ruffians, who were eager to win their master's favour by fair means or foul. They crossed the Channel with astonishing See also:speed; two days after the king's outburst they stood before Becket at Canterbury and threatened him with death unless he should remove the excommunications and submit to his master. The archbishop answered with words as scornful as their own, and took his way to the See also:minster to attend See also:vespers. The knights went out to seek their weapons, and when armed followed him into the north See also:transept, where they fell upon him and brutally slew him with many sword-strokes (December 29, 1170). Thomas had been given time to fly, and his followers had endeavoured to persuade him to do so. It seems that he deliberately courted martyrdom, anxious apparently that his death should deal the king the bitterest See also:blow that it was in his power to inflict (see BECKET). Nothing could have put Henry in such an evil See also:plight; the whole world held him responsible for the murder, and he was forced to buy pardon for it by surrendering many Its results. of the advantages over the Church which he had hoped to gain by enforcing the Constitutions of Clarendon. Especially the See also:immunity of clerical offenders from the jurisdiction of lay courts had to be conceded; for the rest of the middle ages the clerk guilty of See also:theft or assault, See also:riot or murder, could plead his orders, and escape from the harsh justice of the king's officers to the milder penalties of the bishop's tribunal. " Benefit of clergy " became an intolerable See also:anomaly, all the more so because the privilege was extended in practice not only to all persons actually in minor orders, but to all who claimed them; any criminal who could read had a fair chance of being reckoned a clerk.

Another concession which Henry was forced to make was that the appeals to Rome of litigants in ecclesiastical suits should be freely permitted, provided that they made an oath that they were not contemplating any wrong to the English crown or the English church, a sufficiently easy condition. Such appeals became, and remained, innumerable and vexatious. Pope Alexander also extorted from the king a pledge that he would relinquish any customs prejudicial to the rights of the Church which had been introduced since his accession. To the pope this meant that the Constitutions of Clarendon were disavowed; to the king, who maintained that they were in the main a mere restatement of the customs of William I., it bore no such general interpretation. The points were fought out in detail, and not settled for many years. Practically it became the rule to regard suits regarding land, or presentations to benefices, as pertaining to the king's court, while those regarding See also:

probate, marriage and See also:divorce fell to the ecclesiastical tribunal. The question of election to bishoprics and abbacies went back to the stage which it had reached in the time of Henry I.; the choice was made in canonical form, by the chapters or the monasteries, but the king's recommendation was a primary factor in that choice. When the See also:electors disregarded it, as was sometimes the case, there was friction; a weak king was some-times overruled; a strong one generally got his way in the end. Becket's death, then, gave a qualified triumph to the church party, and he was rightly regarded as the successful champion of his See also:caste. Hence they held his death in grateful remembrance; the pope canonized him in 1173, and more churches were dedicated to him during the next two centuries than to any other English saint. In the eyes of most men his martyrdom had put the king so much in the wrong that the obstinacy and provocative conduct which had brought it about passed out of memory. His life of ostentatious austerity, and the courage with which he met his death, had caused all his faults to be forgotten.

Henry himself felt so much the invidious position in which he was placed that even after making his submission to the pope's legates at See also:

Avranches in 1172, he thought it necessary to do See also:penance before Becket's See also:tomb in 11i4, on which occasion he allowed himself to be publicly scourged by the monks of Canter-bury, who inflicted on him three cuts apiece. Between the outbreak of the king's quarrel with Becket at the council of Woodstock and the compromise of Avranches no less than ten years had elapsed—the best years of Henry's manhood. During this period his struggle with the Church had been but one of his distractions. His policy of imperial aggrandisement had been in progress. In 1163 he had completed the conquest of South Wales; the marcher lords were now in possession of the greater part of the land; the surviving Welsh princes did homage for the rest. In 1166 Henry got practical possession of the duchy of Brittany, the only remaining large district of western France which was not already in his hands. Conan, the last prince of the old Breton house, recognized him as his lord, and gave the hand of his heiress See also:Constance to Geoffrey, the king's third son. When the count died in 1171 Henry did not See also:transfer the administration of the land to the young pair, who were still but See also:children, but retained it for himself, and clung to it jealously long after his son came of age. Intermittent wars with France during these years were of small importance; Henry never pushed his suzerain to extremity. But the Angevin dominions were extended in a new direction, where no English king had yet made his power felt. The distressful island of Ireland was at this moment enjoying the anarchy which had reigned therein since the See also:dawn of history. Its state had grown even more unhappy than before since the Danish invasions of the loth century, which had notwelded the native' kingdoms into unity by pressure from without —as had been the case in England—but had simply complicated affairs, by setting up two or three alien principalities on the coastline.

As in England the vikin s had of I ~ g Ireland. destroyed much of the old civilization; but they had neither succeeded in occupying the whole country nor had they been absorbed by the natives. The state of the island was much like that of England in the days of the See also:

Heptarchy: occasionally a " High King " succeeded in forcing his rivals into a precarious submission; more usually there was not even a pretence of a central authority in the island, and the annals of objectless tribal wars formed its sole history. King Henry's eyes had been fixed on the faction-ridden land since the first years of his reign. As early as 1155 he had asked and obtained the approval of Pope See also:Adrian IV., the only Englishman who ever sat upon the papal throne, for a scheme for the conquest of Ireland. The Holy See had always regarded with distaste the existence in the West of a nation who repudiated the Roman obedience, and lived in schismatical independence, under local ecclesiastical customs which dated back to the 5th century, and had never been brought into line with those of the rest of Christendom. Hence it was natural to See also:sanction an invasion which might bring the Irish within the See also:fold. But Henry made no endeavour for many years to utilize the papal grant of Ireland, which seems to have been made under the preposterous " Donation of Constantine," the forged document which gave the bishop of Rome authority over all islands. It was conveniently forgotten that Ireland had never been in the Roman empire, and so had not even been Constantine's to give away. Not till 1168, thirteen years after the agreement with Pope Adrian, did the interference of the English king in Ireland actually begin. Even then he did not take the conquest in hand himself, but merely sanctioned a private See also:adventure of some of his subjects. Dermot MacMorrough, king of See also:Leinster, an unquiet Irish prince who for good reasons had been expelled by his neighbours, came to Henry's court in Normandy, proffering his allegiance in return for restoration to his lost dominions. The quarrel with Becket, and the French war, were both distracting the English king at the moment.

He could not spare attention for the matter, but gave Dermot leave to enlist auxiliaries among the turbulent barons of the South Welsh Marches. The Irish exile enlisted first the services of Maurice See also:

Fitzgerald and Robert Fitzstephen, two half-brothers, both noted fighting men, and afterwards those of Richard de See also:Clare, earl of Pembroke, an ambitious and impecunious magnate of broken fortunes. The two barons were promised lands, the earl a greater bribe—the hand of Dermot's only daughter Eva and the inheritance of the kingdom of Leinster. Fitzgerald and Fitzstephen crossed to Ireland in 1169 with a mere handful of followers. But they achieved victories of an almost incredible' completeness over Dermot's enemies. The undisciplined hordes of the king of See also:Ossory and the Danes of See also:Wexford could not stand before the Anglo-Norman tactics—the charge of the knights and the arrow-flight of the archers, skilfully combined by the adventurous invaders. Dermot was triumphant, and sent for more auxiliaries, aspiring to evict Roderic O'See also:Connor of See also:Connaught from the precarious throne of High King of Ireland. In 1170 the earl of Pembroke came over with a larger force, celebrated his marriage with Dermot's daughter, and commenced a series of conquests. He took See also:Waterford and Dublin from the Danes, and scattered the hosts of the native princes. Early in the next spring Dermot died, and Earl Richard, in virtue of his marriage, claimed the kingship of Leinster. He held his own, despite the assaults of a great army gathered by Roderic the High King, and of a viking fleet which came to help the conquered jarls of Waterford and Dublin. At this moment King Henry thought it necessary to interfere; if he let more time slip away, Earl Richard would become a powerful king and forget his English allegiance.

Accordingly, with a large army at his back, he landed at Water-See also:

ford in 1171 and marched on Dublin. Richard did him homage for Leinster, engaging to hold it as a palatine earldom, and not to claim the name or rights of a king. The other adventurers followed his example, as did, after an interval, most of the native Irish princes. Only Roderic of Connaught held aloof in- his western solitudes, asserting his independence. The clergy, almost without a murmur, submitted themselves to the Roman Church. Such was the first conquest of Ireland, a conquest too facile to be secure. Four years later it appeared to be completed by the submission of the king of Connaught, who did homage like the rest of the island chiefs. But their oaths were as easily broken as made, and the real subjection of the island was not to be completed for 400 years. What happened was that the Anglo-Norman invaders pushed gradually west, occupying the best of the land and holding it down by castles, but leaving the profitless bogs and mountains to the local princes. The king's See also:writ only ran in and about Dublin and a few other See also:harbour fortresses. Inland, the intruding barons and the Irish chiefs fought perpetually, with varying fortunes. The conquest hardly touched central and western See also:Ulster, and left half Connaught unsubdued: even in the immediate vicinity of Dublin the tribes of the See also:Wicklow Hills were never properly tamed.

The English conquest was incomplete; it failed to introduce either unity or strong governance. After a century and It half it began to recede rather than to advance. Many of the districts which had been overrun in the time of the Angevin kings were lost; many of the Anglo-Norman families intermarried with and became absorbed by the Irish; they grew as careless of their. allegiance to the crown as any of the native chiefs. The " Lordship of Ireland " was never a reality till the times of the Tudors. But as long as Henry II. lived this could not have been foreseen. The first generation of the conquerors pushed their advance with such Vigour that it seemed likely that they would complete the adventure. (See IRELAND: History.) It was in 1173, the year after his return from Ireland and his submission to the papal legates at Avranches, that King Henry became- involved in the first of a series of troublefi Rebellion which were to pursue him for the rest of his life—the of Henry's rebellions of his graceless sons. His wife Eleanor of sons. Aquitaine had See also:

borne him many children. Henry, the eldest surviving son, had already been crowned in 1170 as his father's colleague and successor; not only he; but Richard the second, and Geoffrey the third son, were now old enough to chafe against the restraints imposed upon them by an imperious and strong-willed father. The old king very naturally preferred to keep his dominions united under his own immediate government, but he had designated his eldest son'as his successor in England and Normandy, while Richard was to have his mother's heritage of Aquitaine, and Geoffrey's wife's See also:dowry, the duchy of Brittany, was due to him, now that he had reached the See also:verge of manhood. The princes were shamelessly eager to enter on their inheritance, the king was loath to understand that by conferring a titular See also:sovereignty on his sons he had given them a sort of right to expect some share of real power.

Their grudge against their father was sedulously fostered by their mother Eleanor, a See also:

clever and revengeful woman, who could never forgive her husband for keeping her in the background in political matters and insulting her by his frequent amours. Her old subjects in Aquitaine were secretly encouraged by her to follow her son Richard against his father, whom the barons of the south always regarded as an alien and an intruder. The Bretons were equally willing to rise in the name of Geoffrey and Constance against the See also:guardian who was keeping their prince too long waiting for his inheritance. In England the younger Henry had built himself up a party among the more turbulent section of the baronage, who remembered with regret and longing the See also:carnival of See also:licence which their fathers had enjoyed under King Stephen. See also:Secret agreements had also been made with the kings of France and Scotland, who were eager to take advantage of tha troubles which were about to break out. In 1173 the plot was complete, and Henry's three elder sons all took arms against him, See also:collecting Norman, Breton and Gascon rebels in great numbers, and being backed by a French army. At the same moment the king of Scots hie aded Northumberland,and the earls of Norfolk, Chester and Leicester rose in the name of the younger Henry. This was in all essentials a feudal rebellion of the old type. The English barons were simply desirous of getting rid of the strong and effective governance of the king, and the alleged wrongs of his sons were an empty excuse. For precisely the same reason all classes in England, save the more turbulent section of the baronage, remained faithful to the eldea king. The bureaucracy, the minor. landholders, the towns, and the clergy refused to join in the rising, and lent their aid for its suppression, because they were unwilling to see anarchy re-commence. Hence, though the rebellious princes made head for a time against their father abroad, the insurrection of their partisans in England was suppressed without much difficulty.

The justiciar, Richard de See also:

Lucy, routed the army of the earl of Leicester at Fornham in Snffolk, the castles of the rebel earls were subdued one after another, and William of Scotland was surprised and captured by a force of northern See also:loyalists while he was besieging See also:Alnwick (1173-1174). The war lingered on for a space on the continent; but Henry raised the siege of Rouen, which was being attacked by his eldest son and the king of France; captured most of Richard's castles in Poitou, and then received the submission of his undutiful children. Showing considerable magnanimity, he promised to grant to each of them half the revenues of the lands in which they were his destined heirs, and a certain number of castles to hold as their own. Their allies fared less well; the rebel earls were subjected to heavy fines, and their strongholds were demolished. The king of Scots was forced to buy his liberty by doing homage to Henry for the whole of his kingdom. Queen Eleanor, whom her husband regarded as responsible for the whole rebellion, was placed in a sort of honourable captivity, or retirement, and denied her royal state. Henry appeared completely triumphant; but the fourteen years which he had yet to live were for the most part to be times of trouble and frustrated hopes. He was growing old; the indoinitable energy of his early career was beginning to slacken; his dreams of extended empire were vanishing. In the last period of his life he was more set on defending what he already enjoyed, and perfecting the details of administration in his realms, than on taking new adventures in hand. Probably the consciousness that his dominions would be broken up among his sons after his death had a disheartening effect upon him. At any rate his later years bear a considerable resemblance to the corresponding period of his grandfather's reign. The machinery of government which the one had sketched out the other completed.

Under Henry II. the circuits of the itinerant justices became regular instead of intermittent; the judicial functions of the Curia Regis were delegated to a permanent See also:

committee of that body which took form as the court of king's See also:bench (Curia Regis in Banco). The sheriffs were kept very tightly in hand, and under incessant supervision; once in 1170 nearly the whole body of them were dismissed for misuse of their office. The shire levies which had served the king so well against the feudal rebels of 1173 were reorganized, with uniformity of weapons and See also:armour, by the Assize of Arms of 1181. There was also a considerable amount of new legislation with the See also:object of protecting the minor subjects of the crown, and the system of trial by jurors was advanced to the detriment of the absurd old practices of trial by See also:ordeal and trial by See also:wager of battle. The 13th-century See also:jury was a rough and See also:primitive institution, which acted at once as accuser, See also:witness and judge—but it was at any rate preferable to the chances of the red-hot See also:iron, or the See also:club of the duellist. The best See also:proof that King Henry's orderly if autocratic regime was appreciated at its true value by his English subjects, is that when the second series of rebellions raised by his undutiful sons began in 1182, there was no stir whatever in England, though in Normandy, Brittany and Aquitaine the barons rose in full force to support the young princes, whose success would mean the triumph of particularism and the destruction of the Angevin empire. Among the many troubles which broke down King Henry's strong will and great bodily vigour in those unhappy years, rebellion in England was not one. For this reason he was almost constantly abroad, leaving the administration of the one loyal section of his realm to his great justiciar. Hence the story of the unnatural war between father and sons has no part in English history. It is but necessary to See also:note that the younger Henry died in 1183, that Geoffrey perished by See also:accident at a See also:tournament in 1186, and that in 1189, when the old king's strength finally gave out, it was Richard who was leading the rebellion, to which See also:John, the youngest and least worthy of the four undutiful sons, was giving secret countenance. It was the See also:discovery of the treachery of this one child whom he had deemed faithful, and loved over well, that broke Henry's heart. " Let things go as they will; I have nothing to care for in the world now," he murmured on his death-bed, and turned his face to the wall to breathe his last.

The death of the younger Henry had made Richard heir to all his father's lands from the Tweed to the Bidassoa save Brittany, f khard t which had fallen to See also:

Arthur, the infant son of the un- lucky Geoffrey. John, the new king's only surviving brother, had been declared " Lord of Ireland " by his father in 1185, but Henry had been forced to remove him for persistent misconduct, and had left him nothing more than a titular sovereignty in the • newly conquered island. In this Richard confirmed him at his accession, and gave him a more tangible endowment by allowing him to marry See also:Isabella, the heiress of the earldom of Gloucester, and by bestowing on him the honour of Lancaster and the shires of Derby, See also:Devon, See also:Corn-wall and See also:Somerset. The gift was over-liberal and the recipient was thankless; but John was distinctly treated as a vassal, not granted the position of an independent sovereign. Of all the See also:medieval kings of England, Richard I. (known as Coeur de See also:Lion) cared least for his realm on the English side of the Channel; and spent least time within it. Though he chanced to have been born in See also:Oxford, he was far more of a foreigner than his father; his soul was that of a south French baron, not that of an English king. Indeed he looked upon England more as a rich See also:area for taxation than as the centre of a possible empire. His ambitions were continental: so far as he had a policy at all it was Angevin—he would gladly have increased his. dominions on the side of the upper Loire and See also:Garonne, and was set on keeping in check the young king of France, Philip See also:Augustus,, though the latter had been his ally during his long struggle with. his father. Naturally the policy of Richard as a newly crowned king was bound to differ from that which he had pursued as a rebellious prince. As regards his personal character he has been described, not without truth, as a typical man of his time and nothing more. He was at heart a chivalrous adventurer delighting in war for war's See also:sake; he was not destitute of a conscience—his undutiful conduct to his father sat heavily on his soul when that father was once dead; he had a strong sense of knightly honour and a certain magnanimity of soul in times of crisis; but he was harsh, thriftless, often cruel, generally lacking in firmness and continuity of purpose, always careless of his subjects' welfare when it interfered with his pleasure or his ambitions of the moment.

If he had,stayed long in England he would have made himself hated; but he was nearly always absent; it was only as a reckless and spasmodic extorter of taxation, not as a personal tyrant, that he was known on the English side of the Channel. At the opening of his reign Richard had one all-See also:

engrossing desire; he was set on going forth to the Crusade for the recovery of See also:Jerusalem which had been proclaimed in 1187, crusade. partly from chivalrous instincts, partly as a penance crusade. for his misconduct to his father. He visited England in 1189 only in order to be crowned, and to raise as much money for the expedition as he could procure. He obtained enormous sums, by the most unwise and iniquitous expedients, mainly by selling to any buyer that he could find valuable pieces of crown property, high offices and dangerous rights and privileges. The king of Scotland bought for 15,000 marks a See also:release from the homage to the English crown which had been imposed upon him by Henry II. The chancellorship, one of the two chief offices in the realm, was sold to William See also:Longchamp, bishop of Ely, for £3000, though he was well known as a tactless, arrogant and incapable person. The earldom of Northumberland, with palatine rights, was bought by Hugh Puiset, bishop of Durham. Countless, other instances of unwise bargains could be quoted. Having raised every See also:penny that he could procure by legal or illegal means, Richard crossed the Channel, and embarked at See also:Marseilles with a great army on the 7th of August 1190. The only See also:security which he had for the safety of his dominions in his See also:absence was that his most dangerous See also:neighbour, the king of France, was also setting out on the Crusade, and- that his brother John, whose shifty and treacherous character gave sure promise of trouble, enjoyed a well-merited unpopularity both in England and in the continental dominions of the crown. Richard's crusading exploits have no connexion with the history of England. He showed himself a good knight and a capable general—the capture of See also:Acre and the victory of, See also:Arsuf werehighly to his See also:credit as a soldier.

But he quarrelled with all the other princes of the Crusade, and showed himself as lacking in tact and See also:

diplomatic ability as he was full of military capacity. The king of France departed in wrath, to raise trouble at home; the army gradually melted away, the prospect of recovering Jerusalem disappeared, and finally Richard must be reckoned fortunate in that he obtained from See also:Sultan See also:Saladin a peace, by which the coastland of Palestine was preserved for the Christians, while the Holy City and the inland was sacrificed (Sept. 2, 1192). While returning to his dominions by the way of the Adriatic, the king was shipwrecked, and found himself obliged to enter the dominions of See also:Leopold, duke of See also:Austria, a prince whom he had offended at Acre during the Crusade. Though he disguised himelf,.he was detected by his old enemy and imprisoned. The duke then: sold him to the emperor Henry VI., who found pre-texts for forcing him to buy hisfreedom by the promise of a See also:ransom of 150,000 marks. It was not till February 1194 that he got loose, after paying. a considerable instalment of this vast sum. The main bulk of it, as was to be expected, ,was never made over; indeed it could not have been raised, as Richard was well aware. But, once :free, he had no scruple in See also:cheating the imperial. brigand of his blackmail. - For five years Richard was away from his dominions as a crusader or a- See also:captive. There was plenty of trouble during his absence, but less than might have been expected. john's The strong governance set up by Henry II. proved treachery. competent to maintain itself, even when Richard's ministers were tactless and his brother treacherous. A generation before it is certain that England would have been convulsed by a great feudal rising when such an opportunity was granted to the barons.

Nothing of the kind happened between 1190 and 1194. The chancellor William Longchamp made himself odious by his vanity and autocratic behaviour, and was overthrown in 1191 by a general rising, which was headed by Prince John, and approved by Walter, archbishop of Rouen, whom Richard had sent to England with a See also:

commission to assume the justiciarship if William should prove impossible as an administrator. Longchamp fled to the continent, and John then hoped to seize on supreme power, even perhaps to grasp the crown. But he was bitterly, disappointed• to find that he could gather few sup-porters; the justiciar and the bureaucrats of the Curia Regis would give him no assistance; they worked on honestly in the name of the absent king. Among the baronage hardly a man would commit himself to See also:treason. In vain John hi-red foreign mercenaries, garrisoned his castles, and leagued himself with the king of France when the latter returned from the Crusade. It was only the news of his brother's captivity in Austria which gave the intriguing prince a transient See also:hope of success. Boldly asserting that Richard would never be seen alive again he went to France, and did homage to King Philip for Normandy and Aquitaine, as if they were already his own. Then he crossed to England with a band of mercenaries, and seized See also:Windsor and Wallingford castles. But no one rose to aid him, and his garrisons were soon being besieged by. loyal levies, headed by the j-usticiar and byHubertW alter,thenewly elected archbishop of Canterbury. At the same time King Philip's invasion of Normandy was repulsed by the barons of the duchy. Richard's faithful ministers, despite of all their distractions, succeeded in raising the first instalment of his ransom by grinding taxation—a See also:fourth part of the revenue of all lay persons, a tithe from ecclesiastical land, was raised, and in addition much church See also:plate was seized, though the officials who exacted it were themselves prelates.

John and Philip wrote to the emperor to beg him to detain his captive at all See also:

costs, but Henry VI. pocketed the ransom money and set Richard free. He reached England in March 1194, just in time to receive the surrender of the last two castles which were holding out in his treacherous brother's name. With astonishing, and indeed misplaced, magnanimity, Richard pardoned his brother, when he made a grovelling submission, and restored him to his lordship of Ireland and to a great part of his English lands. The king abode for no more than three months in England; he got himself recrowned at Winchester, apparently to wipe out the stain of his See also:German captivity and of an enforced homage which the emperor had extorted from him. Then he raised a heavy tax from his already impoverished subjects, sold a number of official posts and departed to France—never to return, though he had still five years to live. He left behind Archbishop See also:Hubert Walter as justiciar, a faithful if a somewhat high-handed minister. Richard's one ruling See also:passion was now to punish Philip of France for his unfriendly conduct during his absence. He plunged into a war with this clever and shifty prince, which lasted—with certain short breaks of truces and treaties—till his death. He wasted his considerable military talents in a series of skirmishes and sieges which had no great results, and after spending countless treasures and harrying many regions, perished obscurely by a See also:wound from a cross-See also:bow-See also:bolt, received while beleaguering Challis, a castle of a rebellious lord of Aquitaine, the See also:viscount of See also:Limoges (April 6, 1199). During these years of petty strife England was only reminded at intervals of her king's existence by his intermittent demands English for money, which his ministers did their best to satisfy. coast Ito- The machine of government continued to work without uonalde- his supervision. It has been observed that, from one veiopment. point of view, England's worst kings have been her best; that is to say, a sovereign like Richard, who persistently neglected his duties, was unconsciously the See also:foster father of constitutional liberty. For his ministers, bureaucrats of an orderly See also:frame of mind, devised for their own convenience rules and customs which became permanent, and could be cited against those later kings who interfered more actively .in the details of domestic governance.

We may trace back some small beginnings of a constitution to the time of Henry II.—himself an absentee though not on the scale of his son. But the ten years of Richard's reign were much more fruitful in the growth of institutions which were destined to curb the power of the crown. His justiciars, and especially Hubert Walter, were responsible for several innovations which were to have far-spreading results. The most important was an extension of the use of juries into the See also:

province of taxation. When the government employs committees chosen by the taxpayers to estimate and assess the details of taxation, it will find it hard to go back to arbitrary exactions. Such a practice had been first seen when Henry II., in his last year, allowed the celebrated " Saladin Tithe " for the service of the crusade to be assessed by local jurors. In Richard's reign the practice became regular. In especial when England was measured out anew for the great carucage of 1197 —a tax on every ploughland which replaced the rough calculation of Domesday Book—knights elected by the shires shared in all the calculations then made for the new See also:impost. Another constitutional advance was that which substituted "coroners," knights chosen by the county court, for the king's old factotum the sheriff in the See also:duty of holding the " pleas of the crown," i.e. in making the preliminary investigations into such offences as riot, murder or injury to the king's rights or property. The sheriff's natural impulse was to indict every man from whom money could be got; the new coroners were influenced by other motives than financial rapacity, and so were much more likelyto deal equitably with accusations. The towns also profited in no small degree from Richard's absence and impecuniosity. One of the most important charters to London, that which granted the city the right of constituting itself a " See also:commune " and choosing itself a See also:mayor, goes back to October 1191, the troubled month of Longchamp's expulsion from England.

It was given by Prince John and the ministers, who were then supporting him against the arrogant chancellor, to secure the adherence of London. Richard on his return seems to have allowed it to stand. Lincoln was also given the right of electing its own magistrates in 1194, and many smaller places owe grants of more or less of municipal privilege to Hubert Walter acting in the name of the absent king. The English nation began to have some conception of a regime of fixed custom, in which its rights depended on some other source than the sovereign's personal caprice. The times, it may be remembered, were not unprosperous. There had been no serious civil war since the baronial rising of 1173. Prince John's turbulence had only affected the neighbourhood of a few royal castles. Despite of the frequent and heavy demands for money for the king's service, wealth seems to have been increasing, and prosperity to have been widespread. Strong and regular governance had on the whole prevailed ever since Henry II. triumphed over baronial anarchy. Richard's queen, Berengaria of See also:

Navarre, had borne him no children. At the moment of his premature death his nearest kinsmen were his worthless brother John, and the boy Arthur of Brittany, the heir of Geoffrey, the third son Accession of Henry II. On his death-bed the king had designated of John.

John as his successor, holding apparently that a See also:

bad ruler who was at least a grown man was preferable to a child. John's claim prevailed both in Normandy and in England, though in each, as we are told, there were those who considered it a doubtful point whether an elder brother's son had not a better right than a younger brother. But the ministers recognized John, and the baronage and nation acquiesced, though with little enthusiasm. In the lands farther south, however, matters went otherwise. The dowager duchess Constance of Brittany raised her son's claim, and sent an army into Anjou, and all down the Loire many of the nobles adhered to his cause. The king of France announced that he should support them, and allowed Arthur to do him homage for Anjou, Maine and Touraine. There would have been trouble in Aquitaine also, if the aged Queen Eleanor had not asserted her own primary and indefeasible right to her ancestral duchy, and then declared that she transferred it to her best loved son John. Most of her subjects accepted her decision, and Arthur's faction made no head in this quarter. It seemed for a space as if the new king would succeed in retaining the whole of his brother's inheritance, for King Philip very meanly allowed himself to be bought off by the cession of the county of See also:Evreux, and, when his troops were withdrawn, the Angevin rebels were beaten down, and the duchess of Brittany had to ask for peace for her son. But it had not long been granted, when John proceeded to throw away his advantage by acts of reckless impolicy. Though cunning, he was destitute alike of foresight and of self-control; he could never discern the way in which his conduct would be judged by other men, because he lacked even the rudiments of a conscience. Ere he had been many months on the throne he divorced his wife, Isabella of Gloucester, alleging that their marriage had been illegal because they were within the prohibited degrees.

This act offended the English barons, but in choosing a new queen John gave much greater offence abroad; he carried off Isabella of See also:

Angouleme from her affianced husband, Hugh of See also:Lusignan, the son of the count of la See also:Marche, his greatest vassal in northern Aquitaine, and married her despite the precontract. This seems to have been an amorous freak, not the result of any deep-laid policy. Roused by the insult the Lusignans took arms, and a great part of the barons of Poitou joined them. They appealed for aid to Philip of France, who judged it opportune to intervene once See also:Goss of Poitou. John sat inert at Rouen, pretending to take Normandy. his misfortunes lightly, and boasting that " what was easily lost could be as easily won back," Meanwhile Philip Augustus conquered all western Normandy, without having to fight a battle. The great castle of See also:Chateau See also:Gaillard, which See also:guards the Lower See also:Seine, was the only place which made a strenuous resistance. It was finally taken by assault, despite of the efforts of the gallant castellan, Roger de See also:Lacy, constable of Chester, who had made head against the besiegers for six months (September 12o3–March 1204) without receiving any assistance from his master. John finally absconded to England in December 1203; he failed to return with an army of See also:relief, as he had promised, and before the summer of 1204 was over, See also:Caen, Bayeux and Rouen, the last places that held out for him, had been forced to open their gates. The Norman barons had refused to strike a blow for John, and the cities had shown but a very passive and precarious loyalty to him. He had made himself so well hated by his cruelty and vices that the Normans, for-getting their old hatred of France, had acquiesced in the conquest. Two ties alone had for the last century held the duchy to the English connexion: the one was that many Norman baronial families held lands on this side of the Channel; the second was the national pride which looked upon England as a conquered appendage of Normandy. But the first had grown weaker as the custom arose of dividing See also:family estates between brothers, on the principle that one should take the Norman, the other the English parts of a paternal heritage.

By John's time there were comparatively few landholders whose interests were fairly divided between the duchy and the kingdom. Such as survived had now to choose between losing the one or the other section of their lands; those whose holding was mainly Norman adhered to Philip; those who had more land in England sacrificed their transmarine estates. For each of the two kings declared the property of the barons who did not support him confiscated to the crown. As to the old Norman theory that England was a conquered land, it had gradually ceased to exist as an operative force, under kings who, like Henry II. or Richard I., were neither Norman nor English in feeling, but Angevin. John did not, and could not, See also:

appeal as a Norman prince to Norman patriotism. The successes of Philip Augustus did not cease with the conquest of Normandy. His armies pushed forward in the south Loss of also; Anjou, Touraine and nearly all Poitou submitted Anjou, to him. Only See also:Guienne and southern Aquitaine held Touraine out for King John, partly because they preferred a and weak and distant master to such a strenuous and Poitou. grasping prince as King Philip, partly because they were far more alien in blood and language to their Frenchneighbours than were Normans or Angevins. The Gascons were practically a separate See also:nationality, and the house of Capet had no ancient connexion with them. The kings of England were yet to reign at See also:Bordeaux and See also:Bayonne for two hundred and fifty years. But the connexion with See also:Gascony meant little compared with the now vanished connexion with Normandy.

Henry I. or Henry II. could run over to his continental dominions in a day or two days; See also:

Dieppe and See also:Harfleur were See also:close to Ports-mouth and Hastings. It was a different thing for John and his successors to undertake the long voyage to Bordeaux, around the stormy headlands of Brittany and across the Bay of See also:Biscay. Visits to their continental dominions had to be few and far between; they were long, costly and dangerous when a French fleet—a thing never seen before Philip Augustus conquered Normandy—might be roaming in the Channel. The kings of England became perforce much more home-keeping sovereigns after 1204. It was certainly not a boon for England that her present sovereign was destined to remain within her borders for the greater part of his remaining years. To know John well was to loathe him, as every contemporary chronicle bears witness. The two years that followed the loss of Normandy were a time of growing discontent and incessant disputes about taxation. The king kept collecting scutages and tallages, yet barons and towns complained that nothing seemed to be done with the money he collected. At last, however, in I2o6, the king did make an expedition to Poitou, and recovered some of its southern borders. Yet, with his usual inconsequence, he did not follow up his success, but made a two years' truce with Philip of France on the basis of uti possidetis—which left Normandy and all the territories on and about the Loire in the hands of the conqueror. It is probable that this pacification was the result of a new quarrel which John had just taken up with a new enemy—the Papacy. The dispute on the question of free election, which was to range over all the central years of his wiih ne reign, had just begun.

In the end of I205 Hubert papacy. Walter, archbishop of Canterbury, had died. The king announced his intention of procuring the election of John de See also:

Gray, bishop of See also:Norwich, as his successor; but, though his purpose was well known, the See also:chapter (i.e. the monks of Christ Church, Canterbury) met secretly and elected their sub-See also:prior Reginald as archbishop. They sent him to Rome at once, to receive See also:confirmation from Pope Innocent III., whom they knew to be a zealous champion of the rights of the Church. But John descended upon them in great wrath, and by threats compelled them to hold a second meeting, and to elect his nominee Gray, in whose name application for confirmation was also made to the pope. Innocent, however, seeing a splendid chance of asserting his authority, declared both the elections that had taken place invalid, the first because it had been clandestine, the second because it had been held under force majeure, and proceeded to nominate a friend of his own—Cardinal Stephen See also:Langton, an Englishman of proved capacity and blameless life, then See also:resident in Rome. He was far the worthiest of the three candidates, but it was an intolerable invasion of the rights of the English crown and the English Church that an archbishop should be foisted on them in this fashion. The representatives of the chapter who had been sent to Rome were persuaded or compelled to elect him in the pope's presence (Dec. 12o6). King John was furious, and not without good reason; he refused to accept Langton, whom he declared (quite unjustly) to be a secret friend of Philip of France, and sequestrated the lands of the monks of Canterbury. On this the pope threatened today an See also:interdict on himself and his realm. The king replied by issuing a proclamation to the effect that he would outlaw any clerk who should accept the validity of such an interdict and would confiscate his lands.

Despising such threats Innocent carried out his See also:

threat, and put England under the ban of the Church on the 23rd of March I208. In obedience to the pope's orders the large majority of the English clergy closed their churches, and suspended the ordinary course of the services and celebration of the sacraments. See also:Baptism more. He summoned John to appear before him as suzerain, to See also:answer the complaints of his Poitevin subjects, and when he failed to plead declared war on him and declared his dominions escheated to the French crown for non-fulfilment of his war with feudal allegiance. He enlisted Arthur of Brittany in Philip Augustus. his cause by recognizing him once more as the rightful owner of all John's continental fiefs save Normandy, which he intended to take for himself. Philip then entered Normandy, while Arthur led a Breton force into Anjou and Poitou to aid the Lusignans. The fortune of war at first turned in favour of the English king. He surprised his nephew while he was besieging the castle of Mirebeau in Poitou, where the old Queen Eleanor was residing. The young duke and most of his chief supporters were taken prisoners (August I, 1202). Instead of using his advantage aright, John put Arthur in secret confine- ment, and after some months caused him to be murdered. He is said also to have starved to death twenty-two knights of Poitou who had been among his captives. The assassination of his nearest kinsman, a mere boy of sixteen, was as unwise as it was cruel.

It estranged from the king the hearts of all his French subjects, who were already sufficiently disgusted by many minor acts of brutality, as well as by incessant arbitrary taxation and by the reckless ravages in which John's mercenary troops had been indulging. The French armies met with little or no resistance when they invaded Normandy, Anjou and and extreme See also:

unction only were continued, lest souls should be lost; and marriages were permitted but not inside the walls of churches. Foreseeing the wrath of the king against all who obeyed the See also:mandate from Rome, the larger number of the bishops and many others of the higher clergy fled overseas to escape the storm. Those who were bold enough to remain behind had much to endure. John, openly rejoicing at the plunder that lay before him, declared the temporalities of all who had accepted the interdict, whether they had exiled themselves or no, to be confiscated. His See also:treasury was soon so well filled that he could dispense with ordinary taxation. He also outlawed the whole body of the clergy, save the timid remnant who promised to disregard the papal commands. Nothing proves more conclusively the strength of the. Angevin monarchy, and the decreasing power of feudalism, than that an unpopular king like John could maintain his strife Character with the pope, and suppress the discontents of his 's of John rule. subjects, for nearly five years before the inevitable rule. See also:explosion came. Probably his long immunity was due in the main to the capacity of his strong-handed justiciar Geoffrey Fitz-See also:Peter; the king hated him bitterly, but generally took his advice. The See also:crash only came when Geoffrey died in 1213 ; his ungrateful master only expressed joy.

" Now by God's feet am I for the first time king of England," he exclaimed, when the news reached him. He proceeded to fill the vacancy with a mere, Poitevin adventurer, Peter See also:

des Roches, whom he had made bishop of Winchester some time before. Indeed John's few trusted confidants were nearly all foreigners, such men as the mercenary captains See also:Gerard of Athies and Engelhartof Cigogne, whom he made sheriffs and castellans to the discontent of all Englishmen. He spent all his money in maintaining bands of hired Brabancons and routiers, by whose aid he for some time succeeded in terrorizing the countryside. There were. a few preliminary outbreaks of rebellion, which were suppressed with vigour and punished with horrible cruelty. John starved to death the wife and son of William de See also:Braose, the first baron who took arms against him, and hanged in a See also:row twenty-eight young boys, hostages for the fidelity of their fathers,. Welsh princes who had dabbled in treason. Such acts provoked rage a..5 well as fear, yet the measure of John's iniquities was not full till 1212. Indeed for some time his persistent prosperity provoked the indignant, surprise of those who believed him to be under -a curse. If his renewed war with Philip of France was generally unsuccessful, yet at home he held his own. The most astounding instance of his success is that in 1210 he found leisure for a hasty expedition to Ireland, where he compelled rebellious barons to do homage, and received the submission of more than twenty of the local kinglets. It is strange that he came back to find England undisturbed behind him.

His long-deserved humiliation only began in the winter of 1212-1213, when Innocent III., finding him so utterly callous as to the interdict, took the further step of declaring John does him deposed from the throne for See also:

contumacy, and the mage pope. .° handing over the See also:execution of the See also:penalty to the king of France. This act provoked a certain amount of indignation in England, and in the spring of 1 213 the king 'was able to collect a large army on See also:Barham Down to resist the threatened French invasion. Yet so many of his subjects were discontented that he dared not See also:trust himself to the chances of war, and, when the fleet of King Philip was ready to sail, he sur- prised the world by making a sudden and grovelling submission to the pope. Not only did he agree to receive Stephen Langton as archbishop, to restore all the exiled clergy to their benefices, and to pay them handsome See also:compensation for all their losses during the last five years, but he took the strange and ignomini- ous step of declaring that he. ceded his whole kingdom to the pope, to hold as his vassal. He formally resigned his crown into the hands of the legate See also:Cardinal Pandulf, and took it back as the pope's vassal, engaging at the same time to pay a tribute of loon marks a year for England and Ireland. This was felt to, be a. humiliating transaction by many of John's subjects, though to others the joy at reconciliation with the Church caused all else to be forgotten. The political effect of the device was all that John had desired. His new suzerain took him under his protection, and forbade Philip Of France to proceed with his projected invasion, though ships and men were all ready (May 1213). John's safety, however, was secured in a more practical way when his bastard brother, William Longsword, earl of Salisbury, made a descent on the See also:port of See also:Damme and burnt or sunk a whole squadron of the French transports. After this John's spirits rose, and he talked of See also:crossing the seas himself to recover Normandy and Anjou. But he soon found that his subjects were not inclined to follow him; they were resigned to the loss of the Angevin heritage, whose See also:union with England brought no profit to them, however much it might interest their king.

The barons expressed their wish for a peace with France, andwhen summoned to produce their feudal contingents pleaded poverty, and raised a rather shallow theory to the effect that their services could not be asked for wars beyond seas—against which there were conclusive precedents in the reigns of Henry I. - and Henry II. But any plea can be raised against an unpopular king. John found himself obliged to turn back, since hardly a man save his mercenaries had rallied to his standard at See also:

Portsmouth. In great anger and indignation he marched off towards the north, with his hired soldiery, swear- * See also:ing to punish the barons who had taken the lead in the " strike " which had defeated his purpose. But the outbreak of war was to be deferred for a space. Archbishop Langton, who on assuming possession of his see had shown at once that he was a patriotic English statesman, and not the mere delegate of the pope, besought` his master to hold back, and, when he refused, threatened to renew. the excommunication which had so lately been removed. The old justiciar Geoffrey Fitz-Peter, now on his death-bed, had also refused to pronounce sentence on the defaulters. John hesitated, and meanwhile his enemies began to organize their resistance. A great , landmark in the constitutional history of England was reached when ' Langton assembled the leading barons, rehearsed to them the charter issued by Henry I. on his accession, and pointed out to them the rights o f oetuoa and' liberties therein promised by the crown to the barons. nation. For the future they agreed to take this docu- ment as their.: See also:programme' of demands. It was the first of the many-occasions in English history when the demand for reform took the shape of a reference back to old precedents, and now (as on all subsequent occasions) the party which opposed the crown read back into the ancient grants which they quoted a good deal more than had been actually conceded in them.

To Langton and the barons the charter of Henry I. seemed to cover all the customs and practices which had grown up under the rule of the bureaucracy which had served Henry II. and Richard I. A correct See also:

historical See also:perspective could hardly be expected from men whose constitutional knowledge only ran back as far as the memory of themselves and their fathers. The Great Charter of 1 215 was a commentary on, rather than a See also:reproduction of, the old accession pledges of Henry I. Meanwhile John, leaving his barons to discuss and formulate their grievances, pushed on with a great scheme of foreign alliances, by which he hoped to crush Philip of France, even though the aid of the feudal levies of England See also:Alliance was denied him. He leagued himself with his nephew "ranee. the emperor See also:Otto IV. (his sister's son), and the See also:counts of Flanders and Boulogne, with many other princes of the See also:Netherlands. Their plan was that John should land in Poitou and distract the attention of the French by a raid up the Loire, while the emperor and his, vassals should secretly mobilize a great army in See also:Brabant and make a sudden dash at Paris. The scheme was not destitute of practical ability, and if it had been duly carried out would have placed , France in such. a crisis of danger as'she has seldomtknown. It was not John's fault that the campaign failed. He sent the earl of Salisbury with some of his mercenaries to join the confederates in Flanders, while he sailed with the main body of them to La Rochelle, whence he marched northward;. devastating the land before him. Philip"came out greatest victory of the French medieval monarchy. It broke up the Anglo-German alliance, and gave the conqueror undisturbed possession of all that he had won from the Angevin house and his other enemies.

• Indirectly See also:

Bouvines was almost as important in the history of England as in that of France. John returned to England foiled, and in great anger; he resolved to give up the N8$°8 French war, secured a truce with King Philip by Carta. abandoning his attempt to reconquer his lost lands on the Loire, and turned to attack the recalcitrant subjects who had refused to join him in his late campaign beyond the Channel. Matters soon came to a head: on hearing that the king was mobilizing his mercenary bands, the barons met at Bury St See also:Edmunds, and leagued themselves by an oath to obtain from the king a confirmation of the charter of Henry I. (November 1214). At the New Year they sent him a formal See also:ultimatum, to which he would not assent, though he opened. up futile negotiation with them through the channel of the archbishop, who did not take an open part in the rising. At Easter, nothing having been yet obtained from the king, an army headed by five earls, forty barons, and See also:Giles Braose, bishop of Hereford, mustered at Stamford and marched on London. Their See also:captain was Robert See also:FitzWalter, whom they had named " marshal of the army of God and Holy Church." When they reached the capital its gates were thrown open to them, and the mayor and citizens adhered to their cause (May i7). The king, who had tried to turn them back by taking the cross and declaring himself a crusader, and by making loud appeals for the See also:arbitration of the pope, was forced to retire to Windsor. He found that he had no supporters save a handful of courtiers • and officials and the leaders of his mercenary bands; wherefore in despair he accepted the terms forced upon him by the insurgents. On the 5th of June 1215 he sealed at Runnymede, close to Windsor, the famous Magna Carta, in face of a vast assembly among which he had hardly a single friend. It is a long document of 63 clauses, in which Archbishop Langton and a committee of the barons had endeavoured to recapitulate all their grievances, and to obtain redress for them.

Some of the clauses are unimportant concessions to individuals, or deal with matters of trifling importance—such as the celebrated weirs or " kiddies " on Thames and See also:

Medway, or the expulsion of the condottieri • chiefs Gerard d'Athies and Engelhart de Cigogne. But many of them are matters of primary importance in the constitutional history of England. The Great Charter must not, however, be overrated as an expression of general constitutional rights; to a large extent it is a mere recapitulation of the claims of the baronage, and gives redress for their feudal grievances in the matters of See also:aids, reliefs, wardships, &c., its object being the repression of arbitrary exactions by the king on his tenants-in-chief. One section, that which provides against the further encroachments of the king's courts on the private manorial courts of the landowners, might even be regarded as See also:retrograde in character from the point of view of administrative efficacy. But it is most noteworthy that the barons, while providing for the abolition of abuses which affect themselves, show an unselfish and patriotic spirit in laying down the rule that all the concessions which the king makes to them shall also be extended by themselves to their own sub-tenants. The clauses dealing with the general governance of the realm are also as enlightened as could be expected from the character of the committee which drafted the charter. There is to be no taxation without the consent of the Great Council of the Realm—which is to consist of all barons, who arc to be summoned by individual units, and Of all smaller tenants in-chief, who are to be Called not ,by separate letters, but by a general notice published by the sheriff: It has been pointed out that'this provides no See also:representation for sub-tenants or the rest of the nation, so that we are still far from the ideal of a representative See also:parliament. John himself had gone a step farther on the road towards that ideal when in 1213 he had summoned four " discreet men " from every shire to a council at Oxford, which (as it appears) was never held. But this would seem to have been a vain bid for popularity with the middle classes, which had no result at the time, and the barons preferred to keep things in their own hands, and to abide by ancient precedents. It was to be some forty years later that the first appearance of elected shire representatives at the Great Council took place. In 1215 the control of the subjects over the .crown in the matter of taxation is reserved entirely for the tenants-in-chief, great and small. There is less qualified praise to be bestowed on the clauses of Magna Carta which deal with justice.

The royal courts are no longer to attend the king's person--a vexatious practice when sovereigns were always on the move, and litigants and witnesses had to follow them from manor to manor—but are to be fixed at Westminster. General rules of indisputable See also:

equity are fixed for the conduct of the courts—no manis to be tried or punished. more than once for the same offence; no one is to be arrested and kept in See also:prison without trial; all arrested persons are to. be sent before the courts within a reasonable time, and to be tried by a jury of their peers. Fines imposed on unsuccessful litigants are to be calculated according to the measure of their offence, and are not to be arbitrary penalties raised or lowered at the king's good pleasure according to the sum that he imagined that the offender could be induced to pay. No foreigners or See also:ether persons ignorant of the laws of England are to be entrusted with judicial or administrative offices. There is only a. single clause dealing with the grievances of the English Church, although Archbishop Langton had been the See also:principal adviser in the drafting of the whole document. his clause, " that the English church shall be free," was, however, sufficiently broad to cover all demands. The reason that Langton did not descend to details was that the king had already conceded the right of free canonical election and the other claims of the clerical order in a separate charter, so that there was no need to discuss them at length. The special clauses for the benefit of the city of London were undoubtedly, inserted as a tribute of gratitude on the part of the barons for the readiness which the citizens had shown in adhering to their cause. There are other sections for the benefit of the See also:commons in general, such. as that which gives merchants full right of leaving or entering the realm with their goods on payment of the fixed ancient custom dues. But these clauses are less numerous than might have been expected—the framers of the document were, after all, barons and not burghers. The most surprising part of the Great Charter to modern eyes is its sixty-first See also:paragraph, that which openly states doubts as to the king's intention to abide by his promise, and appoints a committee of twenty-five guardians of the charter (twenty-four barons and the ;mayor of London), who are to coerce their master, by force of arms if necessary, to observe every one of its clauses. The twenty-five were to hear and decide upon any claims and complaints preferred against the king, and to keep up their numbers by co-optation, so that it would seem that the barons intended to keep a permanent watch upon the crown. The clause seems unnecessarily harsh and violent in its wording; but it must be remembered that John's character was well known, and that it was useless to stand on forms of politeness when dealing with him.

It seems certain that the drafters of the charter were honest in their intentions, and did not purpose to set up a feudal oligarchy in the place of a royal See also:

autocracy. They were only insisting on the See also:maintenance of what they believed to be the ancient and laudable customs of the realm. That the barons were right to suspect John is sufficiently shown by his subsequent conduct. His pretence of keeping his to meet him with' the whole levy of France (April 121.4), and Paris would have been left exposed if Otto and his Netherland vassals had struck promptly in. But the emperor was late, and by the time that he was approaching the French frontier Philip Augustus had discovered that John's, invasion was but a feint, executed by an army too weak to do much harm. Leaving a small containing force on the Loire in face of the English king, Philip hurried to the north with his main army, and on the 27th Barite of of See also:July 1214 inflicted a crushing defeat on the emperor Bouvtues. and his allies at Bouvines near See also:Lille. This was the promise lasted less than two months; by August 1215 he was already secretly collecting money and See also:hiring more mercenaries. He wrote to Rome to beg the pope to annul the charter, stating that all his troubles had come upon him in consequence of his dutiful conduct to the Holy See. He also stated that he had taken the cross as a crusader, but could not sail to Palestine as long as his subjects were putting him in See also:restraint. Innocent III. at once took the hint; in September Archbishop Langton was sq,spended for disobedience to papal commands, and the charter was declared uncanonical, null and void. The " troublers of the king and kingdom " were declared excommunicate. Langton departed at once to Rome, to endeavour to turn the heart of his former See also:patron, a task in which he utterly failed.

Civil war. Many of the clergy who had hitherto supported the baronial cause drew back in dismay at the pope's attitude. But the laymen were resolute, and 'prepared for open war, which broke out in October 1215. The king, who had already gathered in many mercenaries, gained the first advantage by capturing Rochester Castle before the army of the barons was assembled. So formidable did he appear to them for the moment that they took the deplorable step of inviting the foreign foe to join in the struggle. Declaring John deposed because he had broken his oath to observe the charter, they offered the crown to Louis of France, the son of King Philip, because he had married John's niece See also:

Blanche of See also:Castile and could assert in her right a claim to the throne. This was a most unhappy See also:inspiration, and drove into See also:neutrality or even into the king's camp many who had previously inclined to the party of reform. But, John did his best to disgust his followers by adopting the policy of carrying out fierce and purposeless raids of devastation all through the countryside, while refusing to face his enemies in a pitched battle. He bore himself like a captain of banditti rather than a king in his own country. Presently, when the French prince came over with a considerable army to join the insurgent barons, he retired northward, leaving London and the home counties to his rival. In all the south country only Dover and Windsor castles held out for him. His sole success was that he raised the siege of Lincoln by driving off a detachment of the baronial army which was besieging it.

Soon after, while marching from See also:

Lynn towards Wis-Death of See also:beach, he was surprised by the See also:tide in the fords of the John. See also:Wash and lost part of his army and all his baggage and treasure. Next day he fell ill of rage and vexation of spirit, contracted a dysenteric ailment, and died a See also:week later at See also:Newark (Oct. 19, 1216). It was the best service that he could do his kingdom. Owing to the unwise and unpatriotic conduct of the barons in summoning over Louis of France to their aid, John had become in some sort the representative of national independence. Yet he was so frankly impossible as a ruler that, save the earls of Pembroke and Chester, all his English followers had left him, and he had no one to back him but the papal legate See also:Gualo and a band of foreign mercenaries. When once he was dead, and his heritage fell to his nine-year-old son Henry III., whom none could make responsible for his father's doings, the whole aspect of affairs was changed. The aged William Marshal, earl of Pembroke, by far the most important and respectable personage who had adhered to John's Henryl//. cause, assumed the position of regent. He at once offered in the name of the young king pardon and oblivion of offences to all the insurgent barons. At the same time he reissued the Great Charter, containing all the important concessions which John had made at Runnymede, save that which gave the control of taxation to the tenants-in- chief. Despite this and certain other smaller omissions, it was a document which would satisfy most subjects of the crown, if only it were faithfully observed.

The youth of the king and the good reputation of the earl marshal were a sufficient guaran- tee that, for some years at any rate, an honest attempt would be made to redeem the pledge. Very soon the barons began to return to their allegiance, or at least to slacken in their support of Louis, who had given much offence by his openly displayed distrust of his partisans and his undisguised preference for his French followers. The papal influence was at the same time employed in the cause of King Henry, and Philip of France was forced to abandon open support of his son, though he naturally continued to give him secret help and to send him succours of men and money. The fortune of war, however, did not turn without a battle. At Lincoln, on the loth of May 1217, the marshal completely defeated an Anglo-French army commanded by the count of See also:

Perche and the earls of Winchester and Here- Bartle of Lincoln. ford. The former was slain, the other two taken prisoners, with more than 300 knights and barons. This was the death-blow to the cause of Louis of France; when it was followed up by the defeat in the Dover Straits of a fleet which was bringing him reinforcements (Aug. 17), he despaired of success and asked for terms. By the treaty of See also:Lambeth (Sept. 1 r, 1217) he secured an See also:amnesty for all his followers and an See also:indemnity of 1o,000 marks for himself. Less than a month later he quitted England; the victorious royalists celebrated his departure by a second reissue of the Great Charter, which contained some new clauses favour-able to the baronial interest.

After the departure of Prince Louis and his foreigners the earl marshal had to take up much the same task that had fallen to Henry II. in 1154. Now, as at the death of Stephen, the realm was full of " adulterine castles," of bands of robbers who had cloaked their plundering under the pretence of loyal service to the king or the French prince, and of local magnates who had usurped the prerogatives of See also:

royalty, each in his own district. It was some years before peace and order were restored in the realm, and the aged Pembroke died in 1219 before his work was completed. After his decease the conduct of the government passed into the hands of the justiciar Hubert de See also:Burgh, and the papal legate Pandulf, to whom the marshal had specially recommended the young king. Their worst enemies were those who during the civil war had been their best friends, the mercenary captains and upstart knights whom John had made sheriffs and castellans. From 1219 to 1224 de Burgh was constantly occupied in evicting the old loyalists from castles which they had seized or offices which they had disgraced. In several cases it was necessary to mobilize an army against a recalcitrant magnate. The most troublesome of them was Falkes de See also:Breaute, the most famous of King John's foreign condottieri, whose minions held Bedford castle against the justiciar and the whole shire levy of eastern England for nearly two months in 1224. The castle was taken and eighty men-at-arms hanged on its surrender, but Falkes escaped with his life and fled to France. It was not till this severe See also:lesson had been inflicted on the faction of disorder that the pacification of England could be considered complete. The fifty-six years' reign of Henry III. forms one of the periods during which the mere chronicle of events may seem tedious and trivial, yet the movement of national life and constitutional progress was very important. Except during the stirring See also:epoch 1258—1265 there was little that was dramatic or striking in the events of the reign.

Yet the England of 1272 was widely different from the England of 1216. The futile and thriftless yet busy and self-important king was one of those sovereigns who irritate their subjects into opposition by injudicious activity. He was not a See also:

ruffian or a tyrant like his father, and had indeed not a few of the domestic virtues. But he was constitutionally incapable of keeping a promise or paying a See also:debt. Not being strong-handed or capable, he could never face See also:criticism nor suppress discontent by force, as a king of the type of Henry I. or Henry II. would have done. He generally gave way when pressed, without attempting an appeal to arms; he would then swear an oath to observe the Great Charter, and be detected in violating it again within a few months. His greatest fault in the eyes of his subjects was his love of foreigners; since John had lost Normandy the English baronage had become as national in spirit as the commons. The old Anglo-Norman houses had forgotten the tradition of their origin, and now formed but a small section of the aristocracy; the newer families, sprung from the officials of the first two Henries, had always been English in spirit. Unfortunately for himself the third Henry inherited the continental cosmopolitanism of his Angevin ancestors, and found himself confronted with a nation which was growing ever more and more insular in its ideals. He had all the ambitions of his grandfather Henry II.; his dreams were of shattering the newly-formed kingdom of France, the creation of Philip Augustus, and of recovering all the lost lands of his forefathers on the Seine and Loire. Occasionally his views grew yet wider—he would knit up alliances all over Christendom and dominate the West. Nothing could have been wilder and more unpractical than the scheme on which he set his heart in 1255–1257, a plan for conquering See also:Naples and See also:Sicily for his second son.

Moreover it was a great hindrance to him that he was a consistent friend and supporter of the papacy. He had never forgotten the services of the legates Pandulf and Gualo to himself and his father, and was always ready to lend his aid to the political schemes of the popes, even when it was difficult to see that any English interests were involved in them. His designs, which were always shifting from point to point of the continent, did not appeal in the least to his subjects, who took little interest in Poitou or Touraine, and none whatever in Italy. After the troubled times which had lasted from 1214 to 1224 they desired nothing more than peace, quietness and good governance. They had no wish to furnish their master with taxation for French wars, or to follow his banner to distant Aquitaine. But most of all did they dislike his practice of flooding England with strangers from beyond seas, for whom offices and endowments had to be found. The moment that he had got rid of the honest and capable old justiciar Hubert de Burgh, who had pacified the country during his minority, and set the machinery of government once more in regular order, Henry gave himself over to fostering horde after horde of foreign favourites. There was first his Poitevin chancellor, Peter des Roches, bishop of Winchester, with a numerous band of his relations and dependents. As a See also:

sample of the king's methods it may be mentioned that he once made over nineteen of the thirty-five sheriffdoms, within a fortnight, to Peter of Rivaux, a nephew of the chancellor. Des Roches was driven from office after two years (1234), and his friends and relatives fell with him. But they were only the earliest of the king's alien favourites; quite as greedy were the second family of his mother, Isabella of Angouleme, who after King John's death had married her old betrothed, Hugh of Lusignan. Henry secured great English marriages for three of them, and made the fourth, See also:Aymer, bishop of.

Winchester. Their kinsmen and dependents were equally welcomed. Even more numerous and no less ex-pensive to the realm were the Provencal and Savoyard relatives of Henry's queen, Eleanor of See also:

Provence. The king made one of her uncles, Boniface of See also:Savoy, archbishop of Canterbury—it was three years before he deigned to come over to take up the post, and then he was discovered to be illiterate and unclerical in his habits, an unworthy successor for Langton and Edmund of See also:Abingdon, the great See also:primates who went before him. Peter of Savoy, another uncle, was perhaps the most shameless of all the beggars for the king's See also:bounty; not only was he made earl of See also:Richmond, but his debts were repeatedly paid and great sums were given him to help his continental adventures. King Henry's personal rule lasted from 1232, the year in which he deprived Hubert de Burgh of his justiciarship and confiscated most of his lands, down to 1258. It was thriftless, arbitrary, and lacking in continuity of policy, yet not tyrannical or cruel. If he had been a worse man he would have been put under control long before by his irritated subjects. All through these twenty-six years he was being opposed and criticised by a party which embraced the wisest and most patriotic section of the baronage and the hierarchy. It numbered among its leaders the good archbishop, Edmund of Abingdon, and Robert See also:Grosseteste, the active and learned bishop of Lincoln; it was not infrequently aided by the king's brother Richard, earl of Cornwall, who did not share Henry's blind admiration for his foreign relatives. But it only found its permanent guiding spirit somewhat late in the reign, when See also:Simon de See also:Montfort, earl of Leicester, became the habitual See also:mouthpiece of thegrievances of the nation. The great earl had, oddly enough, commenced his career as one of the king's foreign favourites.

He was the grandson of Amicia, countess of Leicester, but his father, Simon the Elder, a magnate whose SMontimont'ort. de French interests were greater than his English, had adhered to the cause of Philip Augustus in the days of King John and the Leicester estates had been confiscated. Simon, reared as a Frenchman, came over in 1230 to See also:

petition for their restoration. He not only obtained it, but to the great indignation of the English baronage married the king's sister Eleanor in 1238. For some time he was in high favour with his brother-in-law, and was looked upon by the English as no better than Aymer de See also:Valence or Peter of Savoy. But he quarrelled with the fickle king, and adhered ere long to the party of opposition. A long experience of his character and actions convinced barons and commons alike that he was a just and sincere man, a friend of good governance, and an honest opponent of arbitrary and unconstitutional rule. He had become such a thorough English-man in his views and prejudices, that by 125o he was esteemed the natural exponent of all the wrongs of the realm. He was austere and religious; many of his closest friends were among the more saintly of the national clergy. By the end of his life the man who had started as the king's unpopular See also:minion was known as " Earl Simon the Righteous," and had become the respected leader of the national opposition to his royal brother-in-law. Though Henry's taxes were vexatious and never-ending, though his subservience to the pope and his flighty interference in foreign politics were ever irritating the magnates condition and the people, and though outbreaks of turbulence of England were not unknown during his long period of personal under rule, it would yet be a mistake to regard the central Henry t/l. years of the 13th century as an unprosperous period for England. Indeed it would be more correct to regard the period as one of steady national development in wealth, culture and unity.

The towns were growing fast, and extending their municipal liberties; the necessities of John and the facile carelessness of Henry led to the grant of innumerable charters and privileges. As was to be seen again during the first period of the reign of Charles I., political irritation is not incompatible either with increasing material prosperity or with great intellectual development. The king's futile activity led to ever more frequent gatherings of the Great Council, in which the theory of the constitution was gradually hammered out by countless debates between the sovereign and his subjects. Every time that Henry confirmed the Great Charter, the fact that England was already a limited monarchy became more evident. It is curious to find that—like his father John—he himself contributed unconsciously to advances towards representative government. Been. John's writ of 1213, bidding " discreet men " from each pings of shire to present themselves at Oxford, found its Pariiaparallel in another writ of 1253 which bids four knightly meat. delegates from each county to appear along with the tenantsin-chief, for the purpose of discussing the king's needs. When county members begin to present themselves along with the barons at the national assembly, the conception of parliament is already reached. And indeed we may note that the precise word "parliament" first appears in the chroniclers and in official documents about the middle of Henry's reign. By its end the term is universally acknowledged and employed. We may discern during these same years a great intellectual activity. This was the time of rapid development in the See also:

universities, where not only were the scholastic See also:philosophy Into.

and systematic See also:

theology eagerly studied, but figures lectuailife. appear like that of the great Roger See also:Bacon, a scientific researcher of the first rank, whose discoveries in See also:optics and See also:chemistry caused his contemporaries to suspect him of magical arts. His teaching at Oxford in 1250—1257 fell precisely into the years of the worst misgovernance of Henry III. It was the same with law, an essentially 13th-century study; it was just in this age that the conception of law as something not depending on the pleasure of the king, nor compiled from mere collected ancestral customs, but existing as a logical entity, became 492 generally prevalent, The feeling is thoroughly well expressed by the See also:partisan of Montfort who wrote in his jingling Latin See also:verse: Dicitur vulgariter ' ut rex vult lex vadit ': Veritas vult aliter: nam lex stat, rex cadit." , Law has become something greater than, and independent of, royal caprice. The great lawyers of the day, of whom See also:Bracton is the most celebrated name, were See also:spinning theories of its origin and development, studying Roman precedents, and turning the medley of half-understood Saxon and Norman customs into a system. Intellectual growth was accompanied by great religious activity; it is no longer merely on the old questions of dispute between church and state that nien were straining their minds. The reign of Henry III. saw the invasion of England by the friars, originally the moral re-formers of their day, who preached the superiority of the missionary life over the merely contemplative life of the old religious orders, and came, See also:preaching holy 'poverty, to minister to souls neglected by worldly incumbents and political prelates (see MENDICANT MOVEMENT). The mendicants, Dominican and Franciscan, took rapid root in England; the number of friaries erected in the reign of Henry III. is astounding. For two generations they seem to have absorbed into their ranks all the most active and energetic of those who felt a clerical vocation. It is most noteworthy that they were joined by thinkers such as Grosseteste, See also:Adam Marsh, Roger Bacon, See also:Duns Scotus and William of Ockham. Still more striking is the fact that the friars threw themselves energetically into the cause of political reform, and that several of their leading brothers were the close friends and counsellors of Simon de Montfort. See also:Architecture and art generally were making rapid 'strides during this stirring time. The lofty Early English style had now completely superseded the more heavy and Literature and art. sombre Norman, and it was precisely during the years of the maladministration of Henry III. that some of the most splendid of the English cathedrals, Salisbury (1220-1258) and See also:Wells (1230-1239), were built.

The king himself, when rearing the new Westminster Abbey over the See also:

grave of Edward the Confessor, spent for once some of his money on a worthy object. It may be noted that he showed a special reverence for the old English royal saint, and christened his eldest son after him; while his second bore the name of Edmund, the East Anglian martyr. These were the first occasions on which princes of the Angevin house received names that were not See also:drawn from the common continental stock, but recalled the days before the Conquest. The reappearance of these old English names bears witness to the fact that the See also:vernacular was reasserting itself. Though French was still the language of the court and of law, a new literature was already growing up in the native tongue, with such See also:works as See also:Layamon's See also:Brut and the Ormulum as its first fruits. Henry III. himself on rare occasions used English for a state document. All these facts make it sufficiently clear that England was irritated rather than crushed by Henry's irregular taxation and thriftless See also:expenditure. The nation was growing and prospering, despite of its master's maladministration of its resources. On several occasions when he endeavoured to commit parliaments to back his bills and endorse his policy, they refused to help him, and left him to face his debts as best he might. This was especially the case with the insane See also:contract which he made with Pope Innocent IV. in 1254, when he bound the realm of England to find 140,000 marks to equip an army for the conquest of Naples and Sicily. Henry lacked the energy to attempt to take by force what he could not obtain by persuasion, and preferred to break his bargain with the pope rather than to See also:risk the chance of civil war at home. It was over this Sicilian scheme, the crowning folly of the king, that public opinion at last grew so hot that the intermittent criticism and grumbling of the baronage and the nation passed into vigorous and masterful action.

At the " Mad Parliament,"[1214-1264 which met at Oxford, 1258, the barons informed their master that his misgovernment had grown so hopeless that they were resolved to put him under constitutional • restraints. public dls-They appointed a committee of twenty-four, in which content. Simon de Montfort was the leading spirit, and en- The See also:

Pro-trusted it with the duty, not only of formulating o ford.of lists of grievances, but of seeing that they were re- dressed. Henry found that he had practically no supporters save his unpopular foreign relatives and favourites, and yielded perforce. To keep him in See also:bounds the celebrated Provisions of Oxford were framed. They provided that he was to do nothing without the consent of a permanent council of fifteen barons and bishops, and that all his finances were to be controlled by another committee of twenty-four persons. All aliens were to be expelled from' the realm, and even the king's household was to be "reformed " by his self-constituted guardians. The inevitable oath to observe honestly all the conditions of the Great Charter of 1215 was, as usual, extorted from him with special formalities. Though Montfort and the barons voiced the public discontent, the constitution which they thus imposed on the king had nothing popular about it. The royal functions of which Henry was stripped were to be exercised by a series of baronial committees. The arrangement was too cumbersome, for there was nothing which would be called a central executive; the three bodies (two of twenty-four members each, the third of fifteen) were interdependent, and none of them possessed efficient control over the others. It was small wonder that the constitution established by the Provisions of Oxford was found unworkable. They were not even popular—the small landholders and subtenants discovered that their interests had not been sufficiently regarded, and lent themselves to an agitation against the provisional government, which was got up by Edward, the king's eldest son, who now appeared prominently in history for the first time.

To conciliate them the barons allowed the " Provisions of Westminster " to be enacted in 1259, in which the power of feudal courts Was considerably restricted, and many classes of suit were transferred to the royal tribunals, a sufficient proof that the king's See also:

judges did not share in the odium which appertained to their master, and were regarded as honest and impartial. The limited monarchy established by the Provisions of Oxford lasted only three years. Seeing the barons quarrelling among themselves, and Montfort accused of ambition and overweening masterfulness by many of his colleagues, the king took heart. Copying the example of his father in 1215, he obtained from the pope See also:bull, which declared the new constitution irregular and illegal, and absolved him from his oath to abide by it. He then began to recall his foreign friends and relatives, and to assemble mercenaries. De Montfort answered by raising an army, arresting prominent aliens, and seizing the lands which the king had given them. Henry thereupon, finding his forces too weak to face the earl, took refuge in the See also:Tower of London and proposed an arbitration. He offered to submit his case to Louis IX., the saintly king of France, whose virtues were known and respected all over Europe, if the baronial party would do the same. An appeal to the pope they would have laughed to scorn; but the confidence felt in the probity of the French king was so great that Montfort advised his friends to accede to the proposal. This was an unwise step. Louis was a saint, but he was also an autocratic king, and had no knowledge of the constitutional customs of England. Having heard the claims of the king and the barons, he issued the See also:mise of See also:Amiens (Jan.

23, 1264), so called from the city at which he dated it, a document which stated that King Henry ought to abide by the terms of Magna Carta, to which he had so often given his assent, but that the Provisions of .Oxford were wholly invalid and derogatory to the royal dignity. " We ordain," he wrote, " that the king shall have full power and free jurisdiction over his realm, as in the days before the said Provisions." The pope shortly afterwards confirmed the French king's See also:

award. Simon de Montfort and his friends were put in an awkward position by this decision, to which they had so unwisely Religious life: the friars. committed themselves. But they did not hesitate to declare that they must repudiate the mise. Simon declared that it would be a worse perjury to abandon his oath to keep the Provisions of Oxford than his oath to abide by the French king's award. He took arms again at the head of the Londoners and his personal adherents and allies. But many of the barons stood neutral, not seeing how they could refuse to accept the arbitration they had courted, while a number not inconsiderable joined the king, deciding that Leicester had passed the limits of reasonable loyalty, and that their first duty was to the crown. Hence it came to pass that in the campaign of 1264 Simon was supported by a minority only of the baronial class, and the The king's army was the larger. The fortune of war in- barons' clined at first in favour of the royalists, who captured wan Northampton and Nottingham. But when it: came battle 01 to open battle, the military skill of the earl sufficed See also:Lewes. to compensate for the inferiority of his numbers. At Lewes, on the 14th of May, he inflicted a crushing defeat on the king's army.

Henry himself, his brother Richard of Cornwall, and many hundreds of his chief supporters were taken prisoners. His son Prince Edward, who had been victorious on his own flank of the battle, and had not been caught in the rout, gave himself up next morning, wishing to share his father's fate, and not to prolong a civil war which seemed to have become hopeless. On the day that followed his victory Leicester extorted from the captive king the document called the " mise of Lewes," in which Henry promised to abide by all the terms Montfort's of the Provisions of Oxford, as well as to uphold the See also:

para- a me nt. Great Charter and the old customs of the realm. Montfort was determined to put his. master under political tutelage for the rest of his life. He summoned a parliament, in which four knights elected by each shire were present, to establish the new constitution. It appointed Simon, with his closest allies, the young earl of Gloucester and the bishop of See also:Chichester, as electors who were to choose a privy council for the king and to fill up all offices of state. The king was to exercise no act of sovereignty save by the consent of the councillors, of whom three were to follow his person wherever he went. This was a far simpler constitution than that framed at Oxford in 1258, but it was even more liable to criticism. For if the " Provisions " had established a government by baronial committees, the parliament of 1264 created one which was a mere party administration. For the victorious faction, naturally but unwisely, took all power for themselves, and filled every sheriffdom, castellany and judicial office with their own firm friends. Simon's care to commit the commons to his cause by summoning them to his parliament did not suffice to disguise the fact that the government which he had set up was not representative of the whole nation.

He himself was too much like a See also:

dictator; even his own followers complained that he was over-masterful, and the most important of them, the young earl of Gloucester, was gradually estranged from him by finding his See also:requests often refused and his aims crossed by the old earl's action. The new government lasted less than two years, and was slowly losing See also:prestige all the time. Its first failure was in the repression of the surviving royalists. Isolated castles in several districts held out in the king's name, and the whole March of Wales was never properly subdued. When Simon turned the native Welsh prince Llewelyn against the marcher barons, he gave great offence; he was accused of sacrificing Englishmen to a foreign enemy. The new regime did not give England the peace which it had promised; its enemies maintained that it did not even give the good governance of which Simon had made so many promises. It certainly appears that some of his followers, and notably his three reckless sons, had given good cause for offence by high-handed and selfish acts. Much indignation was provoked by the sight of the king kept continually in ward by his privy councillors and treated with systematic neglect; but the treatment of his son was even more resented. Edward, though he had given little cause of offence, and had behaved admirably in refusing to continue the civil war, was deprived of his earldom of Chester; and put under the same restraint as his father. There. was no good reason for treating him so harshly, and his state was much pitied. Montfort attempted to strengthen his position, and, to show his confidence in the commons, by summoning to his second: and last parliament, that Gf 1265, a new element—two citizens from each city and two burgesses from each borough in the realm. It must, be confessed that his object was probably not to introduce a great constitutional improvement, and to make parliament more representative, but rather to compensate for the great gaps upon the baronial benches by showing a multitude of lesser adherents, for the towns were his firm supporters.

The actual proceedings of this particular assembly had no great importance. Two months later Prince Edward escaped from his confinement, and fled to the earl of Gloucester, who now declared him-self a royalist. They raised an army, which seized the fords of the Severn, in order to prevent de Montfort—who was then at Hereford with the captive king-from getting back to London or the Midlands. The earl, who could only raise a trifling force in the Marches, where the barons were all his enemies, failed in several attempts to force a passage eastward. But his friends raised a considerable host, which marched under his son Simon the Younger and the earl of Oxford, to fall on the See also:

rear of the royalists. Prince Edward now displayed skilful generalship—hastily turning backward he surprised and scattered the army of relief at See also:Kenilworth (Aug. 1); he was then free to deal with the earl, who had at last succeeded in passing the Severn during his absence. On the 4th of August he beset Montfort's Baffle little force with five-fold numbers, and absolutely of S' See also:Evesham. exterminated it at Evesham. Simon . fought most gallantly, and was left dead on the field along with his eldest son Henry, his justiciar Hugh See also:Despenser, and the See also:flower of his party. The king fell into the hands of his son's followers, and was once more free. It might have been expected that the victorious party would now introduce a policy of reaction and autocratic government.

But the king was old and broken by his late misfortunes: his son the prince was wise beyond his years, and Gloucester and many other of the present supporters of the crown had originally been friends of reform, and had not abandoned their old views. They had deserted Montfort because he was autocratic and masterful, not because they had altogether disapproved of his policy. Hence we find Gloucester insisting that the remnant of the vanquished party should not be subjected to over heavy. punishment, and even making an armed demonstration, in the spring of 1267, to demand the re-enactment of the Provisions of Oxford. Ultimately the troubles of the realm were ended by the Dictum of Kenilworth (Oct. 31, 1266) and the See also:

Statute of See also:Marlborough (Nov. 1267). The former allowed nearly all of Montfort's faction to obtain amnesty and regain their estates on the payment. of heavy fines; only Simon's own Leicester estates and those of See also:Ferrers, earl of Derby, were confiscated. The latter established a form of constitution in which many, if not all, of the innovations of the Provisions of Oxford were embodied. The only unsatisfactory part of the pacification was that Llewelyn of Wales, who had ravaged the whole March while he was Montfort's ally, was allowed to keep a broad region (the greater part of the modern shire of See also:Denbigh). which he had won back from its English holders. His power in a more indirect fashion extended itself over much of Mid-Wales. The line of the March was distinctly moved backward by the treaty of 1267. King Henry survived his restoration to nominal, if not to actual, authority for seven years.

He was now too feeble to indulge in any of his former freaks of foreign policy, and allowed the realm to be governed under his son's He rhy m eye by See also:

veteran bureaucrats, who kept to the old customs of the land. Everything settled down so peacefully that when the prince took the cross, and went off to the Crusatles in 127o, no trouble followed. Edward was still absent in Palestine when his father died, on the 16th of November 1272. For the first time in English history there was no form of election of the new king,, whose accession was quietly acknowledged by the 494 officials and the nation. It was nearly two years after his father's death that he reached England, yet absolutely no trouble had occurred during his absence. He had taken advantage of his leisurely journey home to pacify the turbulent Gascony, and to visit Paris and make a treaty with King Philip III. by which the frontiers of his duchy of Aquitaine were rectified, to some slight extent, in his favour. He, of course, did homage for the holding, as his father had done before him. The reign which began with this unwonted quietness was perhaps the most important epoch of all English medieval Edward 1. history in the way of the See also:definition and settlement of the constitution. Edward I. was a remarkable figure, by far the ablest of all the kings of the house of See also:Plantagenet. He understood the problem that was before him, the construction of a working constitution from the old ancestral customs of the English monarchy plus the newer ideas that had been embodied in the Great Charter, the Provisions of Oxford, and the-scanty legislation of Simon de Montfort. Edward loved royal power, but he was wise in his generation, and saw that he could best secure the loyalty of his subjects by assenting to so many of the new constitutional restraints as were compatible with his own practical control of the policy of the realm. He was pre-pared to refer all important matters to his parliament, and (as we shall see) he improved the shape of that body by reintroducing into it the borough members who had appeared for the first time in Montfort's assembly of 1265.

He would have liked to make parliament, no doubt, a mere meeting for the voting of taxation with the smallest possible friction. But he fully realized that this dream was impossible, and was wise enough to give way, whenever opposition grew too strong and bitter. He had not fought through the civil wars of 1263–66 without learning his lesson. There was a point beyond which it was unwise to provoke the baronage or the commons, and, unlike his flighty and thriftless father, he knew where that point came. The constitutional quarrels of his reign were conducted with decency and order, because the king knew his own limitations, and because his subjects trusted to his wisdom and moderation in times of crisis. Edward indeed was a man worthy of respect, if not of See also:

affection. His private life was grave and seemly, his court did not sin by luxury or extravagance. His chosen ministers were wise and experienced officials, whom no man could call favourites or accuse of maladministration. He was sincerely religious, self-restrained and courteous, though occasionally, under provocation, he could burst out into a royal rage. He was a good master and a firm friend. Moreover, he had a genuine regard for the sanctity of a promise, the one thing in which his father had been most wanting. It is true that some-times he kept his oaths or carried out his pledges with the literal punctuality of a lawyer, rather than with the chivalrous generosity of a knight.

But at any rate he always endeavoured to See also:

discharge an obligation, even if he sometimes interpreted it by the strict See also:letter of the law and not with liberality. A conscientious man according to his See also:lights, he took as his device the See also:motto Pactum serva, "keep troth," which was afterwards inscribed on his tomb, and did his best to live up to it. Naturally he expected the same accuracy from other men, and when he did not meet it he could be harsh and unrelenting in the punishment that he inflicted. To sum up his character it must be added that he was a very great soldier. The headlong courage which he showed at Lewes, his first battle, was soon tempered by caution, and already in 1265 he had shown that he could plan a campaign with skill. In his later military career he was the first general who showed on a large scale how the national English weapon, the bow, could win fights when properly combined with the charge of the mailed cavalry. He inaugurated the tactics by which his grandson and great-grandson were to win epoch-making victories abroad- Edward's reign lasted for thirty-five years, and was equally important in constitutional development and in imperial policy. The first period of it, 1272-129o, may be defined as mainly notable for his great series of legislative enactments and his conquest of Wales. The second, 1290–1307, contains his long and ulti-[1272–I290 mately unsuccessful attempt to incorporate Scotland into his realm, and his quarrels with his parliament. The changes made by Edward in constitutional law by his great series of statutes commenced very soon after his return to his kingdom in 1274. We may trace in all of them the same purpose of strengthening the power of the crown by judicious and orderly definition of its privileges. The great enactments start with the First Statute of Westminster (1275), a measure directed to the improvement of administrative details, which was accompanied by a grant to the king of a permanent customs-revenue on imports and exports, which soon became more valuable to the royal exchequer than the old feudal taxes on land.

In 1278 followed the Statute of Gloucester, an act empowering the king to make inquiry as to the right by which old royal estates, or exceptional franchises which infringed on the royal See also:

prerogative of justice or taxation, had passed into the hands of their present owners. This See also:inquest was made by the writ Quo Warranto, by which each landholder was invited to show the charter or See also:warrant in which his claims rested. The. baronage were angry and suspicious, for many of their customary rights rested on immemorial and unchartered antiquity, while others were usurpations from the weakness of John or Henry III. They showed signs of an intention to make open resistance; but to their surprise the king contented himself with making complete lists of all franchises then existing, and did no more; this being his method of preventing the growth of any further trespasses on his prerogative. Edward's next move was against clerical encroachments. In 1279 he compelled Archbishop See also:Peckham to withdraw some legislation made in a synod called without the royal permission—a breach of one of the three great canons sMortattmautein. of of William the Conqueror. Then he took the offensive himself, by persuading his parliament to pass the Statute of See also:Mortmain (de religiosis). This was an act to prevent the further accumulation of landed property in the " dead hand " of religious persons and communities. The more land the church acquired, the less feudal taxation came into the royal exchequer. For undying corporations paid the king neither " reliefs " (death duties) nor fees on wardship and marriage, and their property would never See also:escheat to the crown for want of an heir. The Statute of Mortmain forbade any man to alienate land to the church without royal licence.

It was very acceptable to the baronage, who had suffered, on a smaller scale, the same grievance as the king, for when their subtenants transferred estates to the church, they (like their masters) suffered a permanent loss of feudal revenue. A distinct check in the hitherto steady growth of clerical endowments began from this time, though licences in mortmain were by no means impossible to obtain. The great group of statutes that date from Edward's earlier years ends with the legislative enactments of 1285, the Second Statute of Westminster and the Statute of Winchester. second The former contains the clause De Donis Condi- statute of tionalibus, a notable landmark in the history of English West-law, since it favoured the system of entailing estates. minster. Hitherto life-owners of land, holding as subtenants, had possessed large powers of alienating it, to the detriment of their superior lords, who would otherwise have recovered it, when their vassals died heirless, as an " escheat." This custom was primarily harmful to the king—the greatest territorial magnate and the one most prone to distribute rewards in land to his servants. But it was also prejudicial to all tenants-in-chief. By De Donis the tenant for life was prevented from selling his estate, which could only pass to his lawful heir; if he had none, it fell back to his feudal superior. Five years later this legislation was supplemented by the statute Quia Emptores, equally beneficial to king and barons, which provided that subtenants should not be allowed to make over land to other persons, retaining the nominal possession and feudal rights over it, but should be compelled to sell it out and out, so that their successor in title stood to the overlord exactly as the seller had done: Hitherto Constitutional changes. Statutes of Westminster andGioucester. they had been wont to dispose of the whole or parts of their estates while maintaining their feudal rights over it, so that the ultimate landlord could not deal directly with the new occupant, whose reliefs, wardship, &c., fell to the intermediate holder who had sold away the land. The main result of this was that, when a baron parted with any one of his estates, the acquirer became a tenant -in-chief directly dependent on the king, instead of being left a vassal of the person who had passed over the land to him. See also:

Subinfeudation came to a complete stop, and whenever great family estates broke up the king obtained new tenants-in-chief. The number of persons holding immediately of the crown began at once to multiply by leaps and bounds.

As the process of the See also:

partition of lands continued, the fractions grew smaller and smaller, and many of the tenants-in-chief were ere long very small and unimportant persons. These, of course, would not form part of the baronial interest, and could not be distinguished from any other subjects of the crown. The Statute of Winchester, the other great legislative act of 1285, was mainly concerned with the keeping of the peace of the realm. It revised the arming and organization of the statute of national militia, the lineal descendent of the old fyrd, win- and provided a useful See also:police force for the repression of Chhes ester. disorder and See also:robbery by the reorganization of watch and ward. This was, of course, one more device for strengthening the power of the crown. In the intervals of the legislation which formed the main feature of the first half of his reign, Edward was often distracted by See also:external matters. He was, on the whole, on very good terms with his first cousin, Philip III. of France; the trouble did not come from this direction, though there was the usual crop of feudal rebellions in Gascony. Nor did Edward's relations with the more remote states of the continent lead to any important results, though he had many See also:treaties and alliances in hand. It was with Wales that his most troublesome relations occurred. Llewelyn-ap-Gruffydd, the old ally of de Montfort, had come with profit out of the civil wars of 1263-66, and having won much land and more influence during the evil days of Henry III., was reluctant to see that his time of prosperity had come to an end, now that a king of a very different character sat on the English throne. Friction had begun the moment that Edward returned to his kingdom from the crusade.

Llewelyn would not deign to appear before him to render the customary homage due from Wales to the English crown, but sent a series of futile excuses lasting over three years. In 1277, however, the king grew tired of waiting, invaded the principality and drove his recalcitrant vassal up into the fastnesses of See also:

Snowdon, where See also:famine compelled him to surrender as winter was beginning. Llewelyn was pardoned, but deprived of all the lands he had gained during the days of the civil war, and restricted to his old North Welsh dominions. He remained quiescent for five years, but busied himself in See also:knitting up secret alliances with the Welsh of the South, who were resenting the introduction of English laws and customs by the strong-handed king. In 1282 there was a sudden and well-planned rising, which extended from the gates of Chester to those of See also:Carmarthen; several castles were captured by the insurgents, and Edward had to come to the See also:rescue of the lords- marchers at the head of a very large army. After much checkered fighting Llewelyn was slain at the skirmish of Orewyn Bridge near See also:Builth on the 11th of December 1282. On his death the southern rebels submitted, but David his brother continued the struggle for three months longer in the Snowdon district, till his last bands were scattered and he himself taken prisoner. Edward beheaded him at Shrewsbury as a traitor, having the conquest of Wales excuse that David had submitted once before, had . been endowed with lands in the Marches, and had nevertheless joined his brother in rebellion. After this the king abode for more than a year in Wales, organizing the newly conquered principality into a group of counties, and See also:founding many castles, with dependent towns, within its limits. The " statute of Wales," issued at Rhuddlan in 1284, provided for the introduction of English law into the country, though acertain amount of Celtic customs was allowed to survive. For the next two centuries and a half the lands west of Dee and Wye were divided between the new counties, forming the " principality " of Wales, and the " marches " where the old feudal franchises continued, till the marcher-lordships gradually fell by See also:forfeiture or marriage to the crown.

Edward's grip on the land was strong, and it had need to be so, for in 1287 and 1294–1295 there were desperate and widespread revolts, which were only checked by the existence of the new castles, and subdued by the concentration of large royal armies. In 1301 the king's eldest surviving son Edward, who had been born at See also:

Carnarvon in 1284, was created " prince of Wales," and invested with the principality, which henceforth became the regular See also:appanage of the heirs of the. English crown. This device was apparently intended to soothe Welsh national pride, by reviving in form, if not in reality, the separate existence of the old Cymric state. For four generations the land was comparatively quiet, but the great rebellion of Owen See also:Glendower in the reign of Henry IV. was to show how far the spirit of particularism was from extinction. Some two years after his long sojourn in Wales Edward made an even longer stay in a more remote corner of his dominions. Gascony being, as usual, out of hand, he crossed to Bordeaux in 1286, and abode in Guienne for no less than three years, reducing the duchy to such order as it had never known before, settling all disputed border questions with the new king of France, Philip IV., founding many new towns, and issuing many useful statutes and ordinances. He returned suddenly in 1289, called home by complaints that reached him as to the administration of justice by his officials, who were slighting the authority of his cousin Edmund of Cornwall, whom he had left behind as regent. He dismissed almost the whole bench of judges, and made other changes among his ministers. At the same time he fell fiercely upon the great lords of the Welsh Marches, who had been indulging in private wars; when they returned to their evil practice he imprisoned the chief offenders, the earls of Hereford and Gloucester, forfeited their estates, and only gave them back when they had paid vast fines (1291). Another act of this period was Edward's celebrated expulsion of the See also:Jews from England (1290). This was the con- Expulsion tinuation of a policy which he had already carried Jews e out in Guienne.

It would seem that his reasons were partly religious, but partly economic. No earlier king could have afforded to drive forth a race who had been so useful to the crown as bankers and money-lenders; but by the end of the 13th century- the financial See also:

monopoly of the Jews had been broken by the great See also:Italian banking firms, whom Edward had been already employing during his Welsh wars. Finding them no less accommodating than their rivals, he gratified the prejudices of his subjects and himself by forcing the See also:Hebrews to quit England. The Italians in a few years became as unpopular as their predecessors in the See also:trade of See also:usury, their practices being the same, if their creed was not. Meanwhile in the same year that saw the expulsion of the Jews, King Edward's good fortune began to wane, with the rise of the Scottish question, which was to overshadow the latter half of his reign. Alexander III., the last male in direct descent of the old Scottish royal house, had died in 1286. His heiress was his only living descendant, a little girl, the child of his deceased daughter Margaret and Eric, king of Norway. After much discussion, for both the Scottish nobles and the Norse king were somewhat suspicious, Edward had succeeded in obtaining from them a promise that the young queen should marry his heir, Edward of Carnarvon. This wedlock would have led to a permanent union of the English and Scottish crowns, but not to an absorption of the lesser in the greater state, for the rights of Scotland were carefully guarded in the marriage-treaty. But the scheme was wrecked by the premature death of the See also:bride, who expired by the way, while being brought over from Norway to her own kingdom, owing to privations and fatigue suffered on a tempestuous voyage. Welsh wars. Edward I. and Scotland.

She had no near relatives, and more than a dozen Scottish or Anglo-Scottish nobles, distantly related. to the royal line, put in a claim to the crown, or at least to a part of the royal heritage. The See also:

board of six regents, who had been ruling Scotland for the young queen, seeing their own power at an end and civil war likely to break out, begged Edward of England to arbitrate between the claimants. The history of the next twenty years turned on the legal point whether the arbitrator acted—as he himself contended—in the capacity of suzerain, or—as. the Scots maintained—in that of a neighbour of acknowledged wisdom and repute, invited to settle a domestic problem. • This question of the relations between the English and the Scottish crowns had been raised a dozen times between the days of Edward the Elder and those of Henry III, There was no denying the fact that the northern kings had repeatedly done homage to their greater neighbours. But, save during the years when William the Lion, after his captivity, had owned himself the vassal of Henry IL for all his dominions, there was considerable uncertainty as to the exact See also:scope of the allegiance which had been demanded and given. And William's complete submission had apparently been cancelled, when Richard I. sold him in 1190 a release from the terms of the treaty of See also:Falaise. Since that date Alexander II. and Alexander III. had repeatedly owned themselves vassals to the English crown, and had even sat in English parliaments. But it was possible for patriotic Scots to contend that they had done so only in their capacity as English barons—for they held much land south of Tweed—and to point to the similarity of their position to that of the English king when he did homage for his duchy of Guienne at Paris, without thereby admitting any suzerainty of the French crown over England or Ireland. On the last occasion when Alexander III. had owned himself the vassal of Edward I., there had been considerable See also:fencing on both sides as to the form of the oath, and, as neither sovereign at the moment had wished to push matters to a rupture, the words used had been intentionally vague, and both parties had kept their private interpretations to themselves. But now, when Edward met the Scottish magnates, who had asked for his services as arbitrator, he demanded that they should acknowledge that he was acting as suzerain and overlord of the whole kingdom of Scotland. After some delay, and with See also:manifest reluctance, the Scots complied; their hand was forced by the fact thatmost of the claimants to the crown had hastened to make the See also:acknowledgment, each hoping thereby to prejudice the English king in his own favour. This submission having been made, Edward acted with honesty and fairness, handing over the See also:adjudication to a body of eighty Scottish and twenty-four English barons, knights and bishops.

These commissioners, after ample discussion and taking of See also:

evidence, adjudged the crown to John See also:Baliol, the grandson of the eldest daughter of Earl David, younger brother of William the Lion. They ruled out the claimof Robert See also:Bruce, the son of David's second daughter, who had raised the plea that his descent was superior because he was a generation nearer than Baliol to their common ancestor. This theory of See also:affinity had been well known in the 12th century, and had been urged in favour of King John when he was contending with his nephew Arthur. But by 1291 it had gone out of favour, and the Scottish barons had no hesitation in declaring Baliol their rightful king. Edward at once gave him seizin of Scotland, and handed over to him the royal castles, which had been placed in his hands as a pledge during the arbitration. In return Baliol did him homage as overlord of the whole kingdom of Scotland. This, unfortunately, turned out to be the beginning, not the end, of troubles. Edward was determined to exact all the ordinary feudal rights of an overlord—whatever might have been the former relations of the English and Scottish crowns. The Scots, on the other hand, were resolved not to allow of the introduction of usages which had not prevailed in earlier times, and to keep the tie as vague and loose as possible. Before Baliol had been many months on the throne there was grave friction on the question of legal appeals. Scottish litigants defeated in. the local courts began to appeal to the courts of Westminster, justas. Gascon litigants were wont to appeal from Bordeaux to Paris.

King John and his baronage, relying on the fact that such evocation of cases to a superior. court had never before been known, refused to allow that it was valid. King Edward insisted that by common feudal usage it was perfectly regular, and announced his intention of permitting it. Grave friction had already begun when external events precipitated an open rupture between the king of England and his new vassal. Philip. III. of France, who had always pursued a friendly policy with his cousin of England, had died in 1285, and had been succeeded by his son Philip IV., a prince of a very different type, the most able and unscrupulous of andard 1 all the See also:

dynasty of Capet. In 1294 he played a most Philip IV. dishonourable See also:trick upon King Edward. There had been Some irregular and piratical fighting at sea between English and Norman sailors, in which the latter had been worsted. When called to account for the doings of his subjects, as well as for certain disputes in Gascony, the English king promised redress, and, on the suggestion of Philip, surrendered, as a formal act of See also:apology, the six chief fortresses of Guienne, which were to be restored when reparation had been made. Having garrisoned the places, Philip suddenly changed his line, refused to continue " the negotiations, and declared the whole duchy forfeited. Edward was forced into war, of ter having been tricked out of his strongholds. Just after his first succours had sailed for the See also:Gironde, the great Welsh rebellion of 1294 broke out, and the king was compelled to turn aside to repress it. This he accomplished in the next spring, but meanwhile hardly a See also:foot-hold remained to him in Gascony.

He was then preparing to cross the Channel in person, when Scottish affairs began to become threatening. King John declared himself unable to restrain the indignation of his subjects at the attempt to enforce English suzerainty over Scotland, and in July 1295 leagued himself with Philip of France, and expelled from his realm the chief supporters of the English alliance. Finding himself involved in two wars at once, Edward made an See also:

earnest appeal to his subjects to rise to the occasion and " because that which touches all should be approved of all " summoned the The celebrated " model parliament " of November 1295, "model which exactly copied in its constitution Montfort's parvaparliament of 1265, members from all cities and meat" of boroughs being summoned along with the knights of 1295 the shires, and the inferior clergy being also represented by their proctors. This system henceforth became the normal one, and the English parliament assumed its regular form, though the differentiation of the two houses was not fully completed till the next century. Edward was voted liberal grants by the laity, though the clergy gave less than he had hoped; but enough money was obtained to fit out two armies, one destined for the invasion' of Scotland, the other for that of Gascony. The French expedition, which was led by the king's brother Edmund, earl of Lancaster, failed to recover Gascony, and came to an ignominious end. But Edward's own army achieved complete success in Scotland. See also:Berwick was Invasion stormed, the Scottish army was routed at See also:Dunbar of Sco#land. (April 27), Edinburgh and See also:Stirling were easily captured, and at last John Baliol, deserted by most of his adherents, surrendered at See also:Brechin. Edward pursued his triumphant march as far as See also:Aberdeen and See also:Elgin, without meeting further resistance. He then summoned a parliament at Berwick, and announced to the assembled Scots that he had determined to depose King John, and to assume the crown himself. The ease with which he had subdued the realm misled him; he fancied that the slack resistance, which was mainly due to the incapacity and unpopularity of Baliol, implied the indifference of the Scots to the idea of See also:annexation.

The alacrity with which the greater part of the baronage flocked in to do him homage confirmed him in the mistaken notion. He appointed John, earl See also:

Warenne, See also:lieutenant of the realm, with Hugh Cressingham, an English clerk, as treasurer, but left nearly all the minor offices in Scottish hands, and announced that Scottish law should be administered He then returned to England, and began to make preparations for a great expedition to France in 1297. His plan was something more ambitious than a mere attempt to recover Bordeaux; succours were to go to Gascony,- but he Disputes himself and the main army were to invade France from with the the north with the aid of the count of Flanders. Much clergy and money was, of course, needed for the See also:double ex-baronage. pedition, and in raising it Edward became involved in two desperate constitutional disputes. Though the barons and the commons voted a liberal grant at the parliament of Bury (Nov. 1296) the clergy would give nothing. This was owing to a bull—the celebrated Clericis Laicos, recently issued by the arrogant and contentious pope Boniface VIII., which forbade the clergy to submit to any taxation by secular princes. Robert See also:Winchelsea, the archbishop of Canterbury, an enthusiastic exponent of clerical rights and grievances, declared himself in conscience bound to obey the pontiff, and persuaded the representatives of the Church in the parliament to refuse supplies. The king, indignant that an attempt should be made to exempt the vast ecclesiastical lands from taxation at a time of national crisis, sequestrated the estates of the see of Canter-bury, and copied John's conduct in 1208 by outlawing the whole body of the clergy. Winchelsea in return excommunicated all those who refused to recognize the authority of the pope's bull. Scarcely was this quarrel developed when Edward found himself involved in an equally hot dispute with the commons and the baronage. In his eagerness to collect the sinews of war he had issued orders for the levy of a heavy customs duty on See also:wool, the main export of the land, and in some cases laid hands on the wool itself, which lay ready for See also:shipping, though this had not been granted him by the late parliament.

The " maltolt "—or illegal tax—as his subjects called it, provoked the anger of the whole body of merchants in England. At the same time the barons, headed by the earls of Norfolk and Hereford, raised the old grievance about feudal service beyond seas, which had been so prominent in the time of King John. Norfolk, who had been designated to lead the expedition to Guienne, declared that though he was ready to follow his master to Flanders in his capacity of marshal, he would not be drafted off to Gascony against his own will. Hereford and a number of other barons gave him hearty support. Harassed by these domestic troubles, the king could not carry out his intention of sailing for Flanders in the spring, and spent the greater part of the campaigning See also:

season in wrangles with his subjects. He was obliged to come to a compromise. If the clergy would give him a voluntary gift, which was in no way to be considered a tax, he agreed to inlaw them. They did so, and even Winchelsea, after a time, was reconciled to his master. As to the barons, the king took the important constitutional step of conceding that he would not ask them to serve abroad as a feudal obligation, but would pay them for their services, if they would oblige him by joining his banner. Even then Norfolk and Hereford refused to sail; but the greater part of the minor magnates consented to serve as stipendiaries. The commons were conciliated by a promise that the wool which the royal officers had seized should be paid for, when a balance was forthcoming in the exchequer. By these means Edward succeeded at last in collecting' a considerable army, and sailed for Flanders at the end of August.

Insurrec- But he was hardly gone when dreadful news reached tiontn him from Scotland. An insurrection, to which no Scotland. great importance was attached at first, had broken See also:

Wallace. out in the summer. Its first leader was none of the great barons, but a See also:Renfrewshire knight, Sir William Wallace; but ere long more important persons, including Robert Bruce, earl of Carrick (grandson of Robert Bruce of Annandale, one of the competitors for the crown of Scotland), and the bishop of See also:Glasgow, were found to be in communication with the rebels. Earl Warenne, the king's lieutenant in Scotland, mustered his forces to put down the rising. On the 1 rth of September 1 297 he attempted to force the passage of the Forth at Stirling Bridge,and was completely beaten by Wallace, who allowed half the English army to pass the river and then descended upon it and annihilated it, while Warenne ,looked on helplessly from the other See also:bank. Almost the whole of Scotland rose in arms on hearing of this victory, but the barons showed less zeal than the commons, owing to their jealousy of Wallace. Warenne retired to Berwick and besought his master for aid. Edward, who was just commencing an autumn campaign in Flanders which was to lead to no results, sent home orders to summon a parliament, which should raise men and money for the Scottish war. It was called, and made a liberal grant for that purpose, but Archbishop Winchelsea and the earls of Norfolk and Hereford took advantage of their master's needs, and of his absence, to assert themselves. Taking up the position of defenders of the constitution, they induced the parliament to couple its grants of money with the condition that the king should not only confirm Magna Carta—as had been so often done before—but'give a specific promise that no " maltolts," or other taxes not legally granted him, should be raised for the future. Edward received the petition at See also:Ghent, and made the required oath. The document to which he gave his assent, the Confirmatio Cartarum (less accurately called the statute The De Tallagio non concedendo) marked a distinct advance "Con See also:fir-beyond the theories of Magna Carta; for the latter matzo car had been drawn up before England possessed a parlia- taram." ment, and had placed the control of taxation in the hands of the old feudal council of tenants-in-chief, while the Confirmatio gave it to the assembly, far more national and representative, which had now superseded the Great Council as the mouthpiece of the whole people of the realm.

The Scottish revolt had become so formidable - that Edward was compelled to abandon his unfruitful Flemish campaign; he patched up an unsatisfactory truce with the king of France, which left four-fifths of his lost Gascon lands in the power of the enemy, and returned to England in the spring of 1298. In July he invaded Scotland at the head of a formidable army of 25,000men, and on the 22nd of that month brought Wallace to action on the moors above See also:

Falkirk. The steady Scottish See also:infantry held their own for some time against the charge of the English men-at-arms. But when Edward brought forward his archers to aid his cavalry, as William I. had done at Hastings, Wallace's columns broke up, and a dreadful slaughter followed. The impression made on the Scots was so great that for some years they refused to engage in another pitched battle. But the immediate consequences were not all that might have been expected. Edward was able to occupy many towns and castles, but the broken bands of the insurgents lurked in the hills and forests, and the countryside as a whole remained unsubdued. Wallace went to France to seek aid from King Philip, and his place was taken by John See also:Comyn, lord of See also:Badenoch, a nephew of Baliol, who was a more acceptable leader to the Scottish nobles than the vanquished knight of Falkirk. Edward was detained in the south for a year, partly by negotiations with France, partly by a renewed quarrel with his parliament, and during his absence Comyn recovered Stirling and most of the other places which had received English garrisons. It was not till 1300 that the king was able to resume the invasion of Scotland, with an army raised by grants of money that he had only bought by humiliating concessions to the will of his parliament, formulated in the Articuli super cartas which were drawn up in the March of that year. Even then he only succeeded in recovering some border holds, and the succeeding campaign of 1301 only took him as far as See also:Linlithgow. But in the following year his position was suddenly changed by unexpected events abroad; the king of France became involved in a desperate quarrel with the pope, and at the same moment his army received a crushing defeat before Courtrai at the hands of the Flemings.

To free himself for these new struggles Philip made up his mind to conclude peace with England, even at the cost of sacrificing his conquests in Gascony. . Bordeaux had already revolted from him, and he gave up the rest of his ill-gotten gains of 1294 by the treaty of Paris (May Jo; "1303). Now that he had only a single war upon his hands Edward's position was entirely changed. There was no more need to Edward conciliate the magnates nor the parliament. His disagain in. pleasure fell mainly on the archbishop and the earl vades of Norfolk, who had so long led the opposition. Scotland, Winchelsea was put in disgrace, and ultimately exiled. 1303. Norfolk, who was childless, was forced, to sign a grant by which his lands went to the king after his death—a harsh and illegal proceeding, for he had See also:

collateral heirs. But the Scots; as was natural, bore the brunt of the king's wrath. In June 1303, a month after the peace of Paris, he advanced from Roxburgh, determined to make a systematic conquest of the realm, and not to return till it was ended. He kept up his campaign throughout the winter, reduced every fortress that held out, and carried his arms as far as Aberdeen and Elgin. In February 1304 the regent Comyn and most of the Scottish baronage submitted, on the promise that they should retain their lands on doing homage.

Wallace, who had returned from France, kept up a guerilla warfare in the hills for a year more, but was captured in July 1305, and sent to London to be executed as a traitor. Even before his capture it seemed that Scotland was thoroughly tamed, and was destined to share the fate of Wales. Edward's arrangements for the administration of the conquered kingdom were wise and liberal, if only the national spirit of the Scots could have tolerated them. The Scottish parliament was to continue, though representatives from beyond Tweed were also to be sent to the English parliament. The sheriffdoms and most of the ministerial posts were left in the hands of Scots, though the supreme executive authority was put in. the hands of John of Brittany, earl of Richmond, the king's nephew. The land seemed for a time to be settling down, and indeed the baronage were to such a large extent English in both blood and feeling, that there was no insuperable difficulty in conciliating them. A considerable fraction of them adhered consistently to the English cause from this time forth, and ultimately lost their lands for refusing to follow the rest of the nation in the next insurrection. But the delusion that Scotland had been finally subdued was to last only for a year, although in 1305 Edward seemed to have accomplished his task, and stood triumphant, with the northern realm at his feet, his domestic foes humbled, and France and the papacy defeated. His last short interval of peaceful rule was distinguished by the passing of the Statute of Trailbaston in the parliament of 1305. This was a measure for the repression of local riots, empowering justices in every shire to suppress club-men (trailbastons), gangs of marauders who had been rendering the roads unsafe. In the first month of 1306, however, the weary Scottish war broke out again, with the appearance of a new insurgent chief. Robert Bruce, earl of Carrick, grandson of the claimant Robert to the throne of 1292, had hitherto pursued a shifty Bruce.

policy, wavering between submission and opposition to the English invader. He had been in arms more than once, but had finally adhered to the pacification of 1304, and was now entirely trusted by the king. But he was secretly plotting rebellion, disgusted (as it would seem) that Edward had not transferred the crown of Scotland to the line of Bruce when the house of Baliol was found wanting. Though he found himself certain of a considerable amount of support, he yet could see that there would be no general rising in his favour, for many of the magnates refused to help in making king a baron whom they regarded as no more important than one of themselves. But the insurrection was precipitated by an unpremeditated See also:

outrage. Bruce was conferring at See also:Dumfries with John Comyn, the late regent, whom he was endeavouring to tempt into his plots, on the loth of See also:January 1306. An angry altercation followed, for Comyn would have nothing to do with the scheme, and Bruce and his followers finally slew him before the See also:altar of a church into which he had fled. After this crime, which combined the disgrace of See also:sacrilege with that of murder under tryst, Bruce was forced to take arms at once, though his preparations were incomplete. He raised his banner, and was hastily crowned at See also:Scone on the 25th of March; by that time the rising had burstout in many shires of Scotland, but it was neither unanimous nor complete. Edward by no means despaired of crushing it, and had raised a large army, when he was smitten with an illness which prevented him from crossing the border. But his troops; under Aymer de Valence, earl of Pembroke, pressed north, and surprised and routed Bruce at See also:Methven near See also:Perth. The pretender's brother Nigel and many of his chief supporters were taken prisoners, and he himself escaped with a handful of followers and took refuge in the Western islands.

Edward ordered young Nigel Bruce and many other captives to be executed; for he was provoked to great wrath by the rebellion of a magnate who had given him every assurance of loyalty. He intended to follow de Valence to Scotland, and to complete the suppression of the rising in person. But this proved beyond his strength; he struggled as far as the border in July, but could not shake off his disease, and was forced to linger, a broken invalid, in the neighbourhood of See also:

Carlisle for many months. Meanwhile his lieutenants failed to follow up with energy the victory gained at Methven, and in the next spring Bruce re-appeared in the Lowlands, gathered new levies, and inflicted a defeat on de Valence at See also:Loudoun Hill. Roused to anger King Edward rose from his bed, mounted his See also:horse, and started for Scotland. But after struggling on for a few miles he fell by the way, and died at Burgh-on-Sands, just inside the English border, on the 7th of July 1307. Despite the chequered fortunes of his later years the reign of Edward had been a time of progress and prosperity for England. He had given his realm good and strong governance; according to his lights he had striven to keep faith chaEdwofractearrd and to observe his coronation oath. He had on more L'srle. than one occasion quarrelled with his subjects, but matters had never been pushed to an open rupture. The king knew how to yield, and even opponents like Winchelsea and the earls of Norfolk and Hereford respected him too much to drive him to an extremity. The nation, however much it might murmur, would never have been willing to rebel against a sovereign whose only fault was that he occasionally pressed his prerogative too far, Edward's rule was seldom or never oppressive, the seizure of the merchants' wool in 1297 was the only one of his acts which caused really fierce and widespread indignation. For his other arbitrary proceedings he had some show of legal justification in every case.

It would have been absurd to declare that his rule was tyrannical or his policy disastrous.' The realm was on the whole contented and even flourishing. Population was steadily increasing, and with it See also:

commerce; the intellectual activity which had marked the reign of Henry III. was still alive; architecture, religious and military, was in its See also:prime. He was himself a great builder, and many of the perfected castles of that concentric style, which later ages have called the " Edwardian type," were of his own planning. In ecclesiastical architecture his reign represents the early flower of the " Decorated " order, perhaps the most beautiful of all the developments of English art. In many respects the reign may be regarded as the culmination and crowning point of the middle ages. It certainly gave a promise of greatness and steady progress which the 14th century was far from justifying. With the great king's death a sudden change for the worse was at once visible. The individual character of the reigning king was still the main factor in political history, Edward II. and Edward II. was in every respect a contrast to his father. He was incorrigibly frivolous, idle and apathetic; his father had given him much stern schooling, but this seems only to have inspired him with a deeply rooted dislike for official work of any kind. He has been well described as " the first king since the Conquest who was not a man of business." Even Stephen and Henry III. had been active and bustling princes, though their actions were misguided and in-consequent. But Edward II. hated all kingly duties; he detested war, but he detested even more the routine work of administration. He was most at his ease in low See also:company, his favourite diversion was gambling, his best trait a love for farming and the mechanical arts of the See also:smith and the gardener.

His first acts on coming to the throne caused patriotic English- men to despair. His father, on his deathbed, had made him swear to conduct the Scottish expedition to its end. See also:

Pie aaeston. But he marched no further than Dumfries, and then turned back, on the vain pretext that he must conduct his See also:parent's funeral in person. Leaving Bruce to gather fresh strength and to commence the tedious .process of reducing the numerous English garrisons in Scotland, he betook himself to London, and was not seen on the border again for more than three years. He then dismissed all his father's old ministers, and replaced them by creatures of his own, for the most part persons of complete incompetence. But his most offensive act was to promote to the position of chief councillor of the crown, and disperser of the royal favours, a clever but vain and ostentatious Gascon knight, one Piers See also:Gaveston, who had been the See also:companion of his boyhood, and had been banished by Edward I. for encouraging him in his follies and frivolity. Piers was given the royal title of earl of Cornwall, and married to the king's niece; when Edward went over to France to do homage for Gascony, he even made his friend regent during his absence, in preference to any of his kinsmen. It was his regular See also:habit to refer those who came to him on matters of state to " his good brother Piers," and to refuse to discuss them in person. It was of course impossible that the nation or the baronage should accept such a preposterous regime, and Edward was soon involved in a lively struggle with his subjects. Of the leaders of opposition in his father's reign both Hereford and Norfolk were now dead. But Arch-bishop Winchelsea had returned from exile in a belligerent See also:mood, and the place of Norfolk and Hereford was taken by an ambitious prince of the royal house, Thomas, earl of Lancaster, the son of the younger brother of Edward I.

Thomas was selfish and incompetent, but violent and self-assertive, and for some years was able to pose successfully as a patriot simply because he set himself to oppose every act of the unpopular king. He had several powerful baronial allies—the earls of Warwick, Pembroke and Warenne, with See also:

Humphrey See also:Bohun of Hereford, who had succeeded to his father's politics, though he had married the king's own sister. The annals of the early years of Edward II. are mainly filled by contemporary chroniclers with details of the miserable strife between the king and his barons on the question of Progress Gaveston's unconstitutional position. But the really of Bruce in Scot/and. feature of the time was the See also:gradual recon- quest of Scotland by Robert Bruce, during the continuance of the domestic strife in England. Edward I. had laid such a firm grip on the northern realm that it required many years to undo his work. A very large proportion of the Scottish nobility regarded Bruce as a usurper who had opened his career with murder and sacrilege, and either openly opposed him or denied him help. His resources were small, and it was only by constant effort, often chequered by failures, that he gradually fought down his local adversaries, and reduced the English garrisons one by one. See also:Dumbarton and Linlithgow were only mastered in 1312. Perth did not finally fall into his hands till 1313; Edinburgh, Roxburgh and Stirling were still holding out in 1314. During all this time the English king only once went north of the Border—in 1311—and then with a very small army, for Lancaster and his friends had refused to join his banner. Yet even under such conditions Bruce had to retire to the mountains, and to allow the invaders to range unopposed through Lothian and See also:Fife, and even beyond the See also:Tay. With ordinary capacity and perseverance Edward II. might have mastered his enemy; indeed the Comyns and Umfravilles and other loyalist barons of Scotland would have carried out the business for him, if only he had given them adequate support.

But he spent what small energy he possessed in a wretched strife of chicanery and broken promises with Thomas of Lan-caster and his party, dismissing and recalling Gaveston according to the exigencies of the moment, while he let the Scottish war shift for itself. It must be confessed that the conduct of his adversaries was almost as contemptible and unpatriotic. Theyrefused to aid in the war, as if it was the king's private affair and not that of the nation. And repeatedly, when they had Edward at their mercy and might have dictated what terms they pleased to him, they failed to rise to the situation. This was especially the case in 1311, when the king had completely submitted in face of their armed demonstrations. Instead of introducing any general scheme of reform they contented themselves with putting him under the tutelage of twenty-one " lords The ordainers," a baronial committee like that which had '' Lords been appointed by the Provisions of Oxford, fifty or• years back. Edward was not to levy an army, appoint dainers.'° an official, raise a tax, or quit the realm without their leave. He had also to swear an obedience to a long See also:

string of constitutional limitations of his power, and to promise to remove many practical grievances of administration. But there were two great faults in the proceedings of Thomas of Lancaster and his friends. The first was that they ignored the rights of the commons—save indeed that they got their ordinances confirmed by parliament—and put all power into the hands of a council which represented nothing but the baronial interest. The second, and more fatal, was that this council of " ordainers," when installed in office, showed energy in nothing save in persecuting the friends of Edward and Gaveston; it neglected the general welfare of the realm, and in particular made no effort whatever to end the Scottish war. It was clearly their duty either to make peace with Robert Bruce, or to exert themselves to crush him; but they would do neither.

Gaveston's unhappy career came to an end in 1312. After he had been twice exiled, and had been twice recalled by the king, he was besieged in See also:

Scarborough and captured by the earl of Pembroke. He was being conducted to London to be tried in parliament, when his two greatest enemies, Thomas of Lan-caster and See also:Guy, earl of Warwick, took him out of the hands of his escort, and beheaded him by the wayside without any legal authority or justification. The unhappy king was compelled to promise to forget and forgive this offence, and was then restored to a certain amount of freedom and power; the barons believed that when freed from the influence of Gaveston he would prove a less unsatisfactory sovereign. The experiment did not turn out happily. Bruce having at last made an almost complete end of the English garrisons within his realm, laid siege to Stirling, the last and strongest of them all, in the spring of 1313. Compelled by the pressure of public opinion to attempt its relief, Edward crossed the border in June 1314,with an army of 20,000 foot and 4000 men-at-arms. He found Bruce prepared to dispute his advance on the hillside of See also:Bannockburn, 2 M. in front of Stirling, in a strong position with a Battle nock of Ban- stream in front and his flanks covered by rows of See also:pit- See also:burn. falls, dug to discomfit the English cavalry. The Scots, as at Falkirk, were ranged in solid clumps of pikemen above the burn, with only a small reserve of horse. The English king, forgetting his father's experiences, endeavoured to ride down the enemy by headlong frontal charges of his men-at-arms, and made practically no attempt to use his See also:archery to advantage. After several attacks had been beaten off with heavy loss, the English host recoiled in disorder and broke up—the king, who had kept in the rear all day, was one of the first to move off. The flower of his knights had fallen, including his nephew, the earl of Gloucester, who was the only one of the great magnates of the realm who had shown loyalty to him during the last six years.

The Scots also made many prisoners; the disaster was complete, and the wrecks of the beaten army dispersed before reaching the border. Bruce followed them up, and spent the autumn in ravaging Northumberland and Cumberland. Thomas of Lancaster, who had refused to join in the late campaign, took advantage of its results to place the king once more in complete tutelage. His household was dismissed, he was bidden to live as best he could on an Thearl of omas, See also:

allowance of fie) a day, and all his ministers and Lancaster. officials were changed. For more than three years Lancaster practically reigned in his cousin's name; it was soon found that the realm got no profit thereby, for Earl Thomas, Baronial apposition. though neither so apathetic nor so frivolous as Edward, was not a whit more competent to conduct either war or domestic administration. The Scots swept everything before them, ravaging the north at their will, and capturing Berwick. They even made a great expedition to Ireland, where Bruce's brother Edward was proclaimed king by the rebellious Celtic septs, and rode across the whole island, exterminating the Anglo-Irish population in many districts (1315–1317). But the colonists rallied, and cut to pieces a great Irish army at See also:Athenry (1316), while in the next year Roger See also:Mortimer, a hard-handed baron of the Welsh march, crossed with reinforcements and drove back Edward Bruce into the north. Resuming his advance after a space, the rebel king was routed and slain at See also:Dundalk (Oct. 14, 1318) and the insurrection died out. But it had had the permanent result of weakening the king's grip on the north and west of Ireland, where the See also:Englishry had been almost exterminated.

From this time forth until the reign of Henry VIII. the limit of the country in full subjection to the crown was always shrinking, and the Irish chiefs of the inland continued to pay less and less attention to orders issued from Dublin or London. Though the' Scottish expedition to Ireland had been beaten off, this was not in the least to be ascribed to the credit of Lancaster, who was showing the grossest incompetence as an administrator. He could neither protect the Border, nor even prevent private civil wars from breaking out, not only on the Welsh marches (where they had always been common), but even in the heart of England. The most extraordinary symptom of the time was a civic revolt at Bristol (1316), where the towns- folk expelled the royal judges, and actually stood a siege before they would submit. Such revolts of great towns were normal in Germany or Italy, but almost unknown on this side of the Channel. All this unrest might well be ascribed to Lancaster's want of ability, but he had also to bear—with less justice—the discontent caused by two years of famine and pestilence. In August 1318 he was removed from power by a league formed by Pembroke, Warenne, Arundel and others of the lords or- dainers, who put a new council in power, and showed themselves somewhat less hostile to the king than Earl Thomas had been. Edward was allowed to raise an army for the siege of Berwick, and was lying before its walls, when the Scots, turning his flank, made a fierce foray into Yorkshire, and routed the shire-levy under Archbishop Melton at the battle of Myton. This so disheartened the king and the council that controlled him that they concluded a two years truce with Robert of Scotland, thus for the first time acknowledging him as a regular enemy and no mere rebel (1319). The time of comparative quiet that followed was utilized by the king in an attempt to win back some of his lost authority. For a short space Edward showed more capacity and energy than he had ever been supposed to possess. Probably this was due entirely to the fact that he had come under the influence of two able men who had won his confidence and had promised him revenge for the murdered Gaveston.

These were the two Hugh Despensers, father and son; the elder was an ambitious baron who hated Lancaster, the younger had been made Edward's See also:

chamberlain in 1318 and had become his secret councillor and constant companion. Finding that the king was ready to back them in all their enterprises, the Despensers resolved to take the fearful risk of snatching at supreme power by using their master's name to oust the barons who were now directing affairs from their position. The task was the more easy because Lancaster was at open discord with the men who had supplanted him, so that the baronial party was divided; while the mishaps of the last six years had convinced the nation that other rulers could be as incompetent and as unlucky as the king. Indeed, there was a decided reaction in Edward's favour, since Lancaster and his friends had been tried and found wanting. Moreover, the Despensers felt that they had a great advantage over Gaveston in that they were native-born barons of ancient ancestry and good estate: the 3rounger Hugh, indeed, through his marriage with the sister of the earl of Gloucester who fell at Bannockburn, was one of the greatest landowners on the Welsh border: they could not be styled upstarts or adventurers. Edward's growing confidence in the Despensers at last provoked the notice and jealousy of the dominant party. The barons brought up many armed retainers to the parliament of 1321, and forced the king to dismiss and to condemn them to exile. But their discomfiture was only to last a few months; in the following October a wanton outrage and. assault on the person and retinue of Edward's queen, Isabella of - France, by the retainers of Lord See also:Badlesmere, one of Pembroke's associates, provoked universal reprobation. The king made it an excuse for gathering an army to besiege Badlesmere's castle at See also:Leeds; he took it and hanged the garrison. He then declared the Despensers pardoned, and invited them to return to England. On this Thomas of Lan-caster and the more resolute of his associates took arms, but the majority both of the baronage and of the commons remained quiescent, public opinion being rather with than against the king. The rebels displayed great indecision, and Lancaster proved such a bad general that he was finally driven into the north and beaten at the battle of See also:Boroughbridge (March 16, 1322), where his chief See also:associate, the earl of Hereford, was slain.

Next day he surrendered, with the wreck Bxecutton of his host. But the king, who showed himself un- Lancaster. expectedly vindictive, beheaded him at once; three other peers, B adlesmere, See also:

Clifford and Mowbray,were subsequently executed, with a See also:score of knights. Such severity was most impolitic, and Lancaster was ere long hailed as a saint and a martyr. But for the moment the king seemed triumphant; he called a parliament which revoked the, " ordinances " of 1311, and replaced the Despensers in power. For the remaining four years of his reign they were omnipotent; but able and unscrupulous as they were, they could not solve the problem of successful governance. To their misfortune the Scottish war once more recommenced, King Robert having refused to continue the truce. The fortune of Edward II. now hung on the chance that he might be able to maintain the struggle with success; he raised a large army and invaded Lothian, but Bruce refused a pitched battle, and drove him off with loss by devastating the countryside around him. Thereupon Edward, to the deep humiliation of the people, sued for another cessation of hostilities, and obtained it by conceding all that Robert asked, save the formal acknowledgment of his kingly title. But peace did not suffice to end Edward's troubles; he dropped back into his usual apathy, and the Despensers showed themselves so harsh and greedy that the general indignation only required a new leader in order to take once more the form of open insurrection. The end came in an unexpected fashion. Edward had quarrelled with his wife Isabella, who complained that he made her the " handmaid of the Despensers," and excluded her from her proper place and honour. Yet in 1325 he was unwise enough to send her over to France on an See also:embassy to her brother Charles IV., and to allow his eldest son Edward, prince of Wales, to follow her to Paris.

Having the boy in her power, and being surrounded by the exiles of Lancaster's faction, she set herself to plot against her husband, and opened up com- Rebellion munications with the discontented in England. It was of Queen in vain that Edward besought her to return and to re- Isabella See also:

store him his son; she came back at last,but at the head and of an army commanded by Roger, Lord Mortimer, the Mortimer. most prominent survivor of the party of Earl Thomas, with whom she had formed an adulterous connexion which they for some time succeeded in keeping secret. When she landed with her son in Essex in September 1326, she was at once joined by Henry of Lancaster, the heir of Earl Thomas, and most of the baronage of the eastern Deposition counties. Even the king's half-brother, the earl of and Norfolk, rallied to her banner. Edward and the De- murder of spensers, after trying in vain to raise an army, fled Edward into the west. They were all caught by their pursuers; the two Despensers were executed—the one at Bristol, the other at Hereford. Several more of Edward's scanty band of friends—the earl of Arundel and the bishop of Exeter and others—were also slain. Their unhappy master was forced to abdicate on The Despensers. the loth of January 1327, his fourteen-year old son being pro-claimed king in his See also:stead. He was allowed to survive in close prison some eight months longer, but when his robust constitution defied all attempts to kill him by privations, he was murdered by the orders of the queen and Mortimer at See also:Berkeley Castle on the 21st of September. The three years regency of Isabella, during the minority of Edward III., formed a disgraceful See also:episode in the history of Regency of England. She was as much the See also:tool of Mortimer as Isabella her husband had been the tool of the Despensers, and and their relations became gradually evident to the whole Mortimer. nation.

All posts of dignity and emolument were kept for their personal adherents, and a new and formidable dignity was conferred on Mortimer himself, when he was made both justiciar of the principality of Wales, and also earl of March, in which lay both his own broad lands and the estates of Despenser and Arundel, which he had shamelessly appropriated. It is surprising that the adulterous pair succeeded in maintaining themselves in power for so long, since the ignominy of the situation was evident. They were even able to quell the first attempt at a reaction, by seizing and See also:

beheading Edmund, earl of Kent, the late king's half-brother, who was betrayed while organizing a plot for their destruction. The one politic act of Mortimer's administration, the conclusion of a permanent peace with Scotland by acknowledging Bruce as king (1328), was not one which made him more popular. The people called it the shameful peace of Northampton," and firmly believed that he had been bribed by the Scots. Yet Isabella and her paramour held on to power for two years after the peace, and were only overthrown by a blow from an unexpected quarter. When the young king had reached the age of eighteen he began to understand the disgraceful nature of his own situation. Having secured promise of aid from Henry of Lancaster, his See also:cousins and other barons, he executed a coup de main, and seized Mortimer in -his chamber at midnight. The queen was also put under guard till a parliament could be called. It met, and at the king's demand passed sentence on the earl for the murder of Edward II. and other crimes. He was hanged at See also:Tyburn (Nov. 1330); the queen suffered nothing worse than complete exclusion from power, and lived for more than twenty years in retirement on the manors of her dowry.

Edward III., who thus commenced his reign ere he was out of his boyhood, was, as might have been foretold from his prompt action against Mortimer, a prince of great vigour and enterprise. He showed none of his father's weakness and much of his See also:

grand-father's capacity. He fell short of Edward I. in steadiness of character and organizing power, but possessed all his military capacity and his love of work. Unfortunately for England his ambition was to be the See also:mirror of See also:chivalry rather than a model administrator. He took up and abandoned great enterprises with equal levity; he was reckless in the spending of money; and in times of trouble he was careless of constitutional precedent, and See also:apt to push his prerogative to extremes. Yet like Edward I. he was popular with his subjects, who pardoned him much in See also:consideration of his knightly virtues, his courage, his ready See also:courtesy and his love of adventure. In most respects he was a perfect exponent of the ideals and foibles of his age, and when he broke a promise or repudiated a debt he was but displaying the less satisfactory side of the habitual morality of the 14th century the chivalry of which was often deficient in the less showy virtues. With all his faults Edward during his prime was a capable and vigorous ruler; and it was not without reaon that not England only but all western Europe looked up to him as the greatest king of his generation. His early years were specially fortunate, as his rule contrasted in the most favourable way with that of his infamous mother Edward and his contemptible father. The ministers whom m, he substituted for the creatures of Mortimer were tn•-ades capable, if not talented administrators. He did much to Scotland. restore the See also:internal peace of the realm, and put down the local disorders which had been endemic for the last twenty years. Moreover, when the war with Scotland recommenced he gave the English a See also:taste of victory such as they had not enjoyed since Falkirk.

Robert Bruce was now dead and his throne was occupied by the young David II., whose factious nobles were occupied in civil strife when, in 1332, a pretender made a snatch at the Scottish throne. This was Edward, the son of John Baliol, an adventurous baron who collected all the " disinherited " Scots lords, the members of the old English faction who had been expelled by Bruce, and invaded the realm at their head. He beat the regent See also:

Mar at the battle of Dupplin, seized Perth and Edinburgh, and crowned himself at Scone. But knowing that his seat was precarious he did homage to the English king, and made him all the promises that his father had given to Edward I. The temptation was too great for the young king to refuse; he accepted the homage, and offered the aid of his arms. It was soon required, for Baliol was ere long expelled from Scotland. Edward won the battle of Halidon Hill (July 19, 1333)—where he displayed considerable See also:tactical skill—captured Berwick, and reconquered a considerable portion of Scotland for his vassal. Unfortunately for himself he made the mistake of requiring too much from Baliol—forcing him to cede Lothian, See also:Tweeddale and the larger part of See also:Galloway, and to promise a tribute. These terms so irritated the Scots, who had shown signs of submission up to this moment, that they refused to accept the pretender, and kept up a long guerilla warfare which ended in his final expulsion. But the fighting was all on Scottish ground, and Edward repeatedly made incursions, showy if not effective, into the very heart of the northern realm; on one occasion he reached See also:Inverness unopposed. He held Perth till 1339, Edinburgh till 1341, and was actually in possession of much Scottish territory when his attention was called off from this minor war to the greater question of the struggle with France. Meanwhile he had acquired no small military reputation, had collected a large body of professional soldiers whose experience was to be invaluable to him in the continental war, and had taught his army the new tactics which were to win See also:Crecy and See also:Poitiers.

For the devices employed against the Scottish " schiltrons of pikemen at Dupplin and Halidon, were the same as those which won all the great battles of the Hundred Years' War—the See also:

combination of archery, not with cavalry (the old system of Hastings and Falkirk), but with dismounted men-at-arms. The nation, meanwhile prosperous, not vexed by over-much taxation, and proud of its young king, was ready and willing to follow him into any adventure that he might indicate. IV. THE HUNDRED YEARS' WAR (1337—1453) Wars between England and France had been many, since William the Conqueror first linked their fortunes together by adding his English kingdom to his Norman duchy. causes of They were bound to recur as long as the kings who the ruled on this side of the Channel were possessed of Hundred continental dominions, which lay as near, or nearer, to Years' their hearts than their insular realm. While the king- dom war of France was weak, monarchs like Henry II. and Richard I. might dream of extending their transmarine possessions to the detriment of their suzerain at Paris. When France had grown strong, under Philip Augustus, the house of Plantagenet still retained a broad territory in Gascony and Guienne, and the house of Capet could not but covet the possession of the largest surviving feudal appanage which marred the solidarity of their kingdom. There had been a long interval of peace in the 13th century, because Henry III. of England was weak, and Louis IX. of France an idealist, much more set. on forwarding the welfare of Christendom than the expansion of France. But the inevitable struggle had recommenced with the accession of the unscrupulous Philip IV. Its cause was See also:simple; France was incomplete as long as the English king ruled at Bordeaux and Bayonne, and far up the valleys of the Garonne and the See also:Adour. From 1293 onward Philip and his sons had been striving to make an end of the power of the Plantagenets in Aquitaine, sometimes by the simple See also:argument of war, more frequently by the insidious process of encroaching on ducal rights, summoning Edward uI. litigants to Paris, and encouraging local magnates and cities alike to See also:play off their allegiance to their suzerain against that to their immediate lord. Both in the time of Edward II. and in that of his son active violence had several times been called in to aid legal chicanery.

Fortunately for the duke of Guienne the majority of his subjects had no desire to become French-men; the Gascons felt no national sympathy with their neighbours of the north, and the towns in especial were linked to England by close ties of commerce, and had no wish whatever to break off their allegiance to the house of Plantagenet. The English rule, if often weak, had never proved tyrannical, and they had a great dread of French taxes and French officialism. But there were always individuals, more numerous among the noblesse than among the citizens, whose private interests impelled them to seek the aid of France. The root of the Hundred Years' War, now just about to commence, must be sought in the affairs of Guienne, and not in any of the other causes which complicated and obscured the outbreak of hostilities. These, however, were sufficiently important in themselves. The most obvious was the aid which Philip VI. had given to the exiled David Bruce, when he was driven out of Scotland by Edward and his ally Baliol. The English king replied by welcoming and harbouring Robert of See also:

Artois, a cousin whom Philip VI. had expelled from France. He also made alliances with several of the See also:dukes and counts of the Netherlands, and with the emperor Louis the Bavarian, obviously with the intention of raising trouble for France on her northern and eastern frontiers. It was Philip, however, who actually began the war, by declaring Guienne and the other continental dominions of Edward III. forfeited to the French crown, and sending out a fleet Beginning of the he war. which ravaged the south coast of England in 1337. In return Edward raised a claim to the throne of France, not that he had any serious intention of pressing it —for throughout his reign he always showed himself ready to See also:barter it away in return for sufficient territorial gains—but because such a claim was in several ways a useful asset to him both in war and in See also:diplomacy. It was first turned to account when the Flemings, who had scruples about opposing their See also:liege lord the king of France, found it convenient to discover that, since Edward was the real king and not Philip, their allegiance was due in the same direction whither their commercial interests drew them.

Led by the great See also:

demagogue dictator, See also:Jacob See also:van See also:Artevelde, they became the mainstay of the English party in the Netherlands. Edward's claim—such as it was—rested on the assertion that his mother, Isabella, was nearer of kin to her brother Charles Edward IV., the last king of the main line of the house of Capet, in. and than was Charles's cousin Philip of See also:Valois. The French the French lawyers ruled that heiresses could not succeed to the Drown. crown themselves, but Edward pleaded that they could nevertheless transmit their right to their sons. He found it convenient to forget that the elder brother of Charles IV., King Louis X., had left a daughter, whose son, the king of Navarre, had on this theory a title preferable to his own. This prince, he said, had not been born at the time of his grand-father's death, and so lost any rights that might have passed to him had he been alive at that time. A far more fatal bar to Edward's claim than the existence of Charles of Navarre was the fact that the peers of France, when summoned to decide the succession question nine years before, had decided that Philip of Valois had the sole valid claim to the crown, and that Edward had then done homage to him for Guienne. If he pleaded that in 1328 he had been the mere tool of his mother and Mortimer, he could be reminded of the unfortunate fact that in 1331, after he had crushed Mortimer, and taken the power into his own hands, he had deliberately renewed his oath to King Philip. Edward's claim to the French crown embittered the strife in a most unnecessary fashion. It was an appeal to every discontented French vassal to become a traitor under a plausible show of loyalty, and from first to last many such persons utilized it. It also gave Edward an excuse for treating every loyal Frenchman as guilty of treason, and, to his shame, he did not always refrain from employing such a discreditable device. Yet, as has been already said, he showed his consciousness of the See also:fallacy of his claim by offering to barter it again and again during the course of the war for land or money. But he finally passed on the wretched fiction as a heritage of his descendants, to cause untold woes in the 15th century.

It is seldom in the world's history that a hollow legal device such as this has had such long enduring and deplorable results. In the commencement of his continental war Edward took little profit either from his See also:

assumption of the French royal title, or from the lengthy list of princes of the Low Countries whom he enrolled beneath his banner. His two land- Battle of S/uys. campaigns of 1339 and 1340 led to no victories or conquests, but cost enormous sums of money. The Netherland allies brought large contingents and took high pay from the king, but they showed neither energy nor enthusiasm in his cause. When Philip of Valois refused battle in the open, and confined his operations to defending fortified towns, or stockading himself in entranched camps, the allies drifted off, leaving the king with his English troops in force too small to accomplish anything. The sole achievement of the early years of the war which was of any profit to Edward or his realm was the great naval triumph of See also:Sluys (June 24, 1340), which gave the English the command of the sea for the next twenty years. The French king had built or hired an enormous fleet, and with it threatened to invade England. Seeing that he could do nothing on land while his communications with the Low Countries were endangered by the existence of this See also:armada, Edward levied every ship that was to be found, and brought the enemy to action in the Flemish harbour of Sluys. After a day of desperate hand to hand fighting—for the vessels grappled and the whole matter was settled by boarding—the French fleet was annihilated. Hence-forth England was safe from coast raids, could conduct her commerce with Flanders without danger, and could strike with-out difficulty at any point of the French littoral. But it was not for some years that Edward utilized the advantage that Sluys had given him. As long as he persevered in the attempt to conduct the invasion of the northern frontier of France he achieved nothing.

Such schemes were finally abandoned simply because the king discovered that his allies were worthless and that his money was all spent. On his return from Flanders in 1340 he became involved in an angry controversy with his Financial ~' crisis. ministers, whom he accused, quite unjustly, of wasting Trial of his revenue and wrecking his campaign thereby. He Arch" imprisoned some of them, and wished to try his late bishop See also:

Stratford chancellor, Archbishop Stratford, for See also:embezzlement, in the court of the exchequer. But the primate contended very vigorously for the right to be tried before his peers, and since the king could get no subsidies from his parliament till he acknowledged the justice of this claim, he was forced to concede it. Stratford was acquitted—the king's thriftlessness and not the chancellor's maladministration had emptied the treasury. Edward drifted on along the path to financial ruin till he actually went bankrupt in 1345, when he repudiated his debts, and ruined several great Italian banking houses, who had been unwise enough to continue lending him money to the last. The Flemings were also hard hit by this collapse of the king's credit, and very naturally lost their enthusiasm for the English alliance. Van Artevelde, its chief See also:advocate, was murdered by his own towns-men in this same year. The second act of the Hundred Years' War, after King Edward ha?! abandoned in despair his idea of invading France from the side of the Netherlands, was fought out in another quarter—the duchy of Brittany. Here a war of warm Brittany. succession had broken out in which (oddly enough) .

Edward took up the cause of the pretender who had male descent, while Philip supported the one who represented a female line—each thus backing the theory of heritage by which his rival claimed the throne of France. By espousing the cause of John of Montfort Edward obtained a good foothold on the flank of France, for many of the Breton fortresses were put into his hands. But he failed to win any decisive advantage thereby over King Philip. It was not till 1346, when he adopted the new policy of trusting nothing to allies, and striking at the heart of France with a purely English army, that Edward found the fortune of war turning in his favour. In this year he landed in Normandy, where the English banner had not been seen since the days of King John, and executed a destructive raid through the duchy, and up the Seine, till he almost reached the gates of Paris. This brought out the king of France against him, with a mighty host, before which Edward retreated northward, apparently intending to retire to Flanders. But after crossing the Somme he halted at Crecy, near See also:

Abbeville, and offered battle to the pursuing enemy. He fought relying on Battle of the tactics which had been tried against the Scots at Dupplin and Halidon Hill, See also:drawing up his army with masses of dismounted men-at-arms flanked on either side by archery. This See also:array proved as effective against the disorderly charges of the French noblesse as it had been against the heavy columns of the Scottish pikemen. Fourteen times the squadrons of King Philip came back to the charge; but mowed down by the arrow-shower, they seldom could get to handstrokes with the English knights, and at last rode off the field in disorder. This astonishing victory over fourfold numbers was no mere chivalrous feat of arms, it had the solid result of giving the victors a foothold in northern France. For Edward took his army to beleaguer See also:Calais, and after blockading it for nearly a year forced it to surrender.

King Philip, after his experience at Crecy, refused to fight again in order to raise the siege. From henceforth the English possessed a secure landing-place in northern France, at the most convenient point possible, immediately opposite Dover. They held it for over two hundred years, to their own inestimable advantage in every recurring war. The years 1345–1347 saw the zenith of King Edward's pros- perity; in them fell not only his own triumphs at Crecy and Calais, but a victory at Auberoche in See also:

Perigord won Battle of by his cousin Henry of Lancaster, which restored See also:Neville's Cross. many long-lost regions of Guienne to the English suzerainty (Oct. 21, 1345), and another and more famous battle in the far north. At Neville's Cross, near Durham, the lords of the Border defeated and captured David Bruce, king of Scotland (Oct. 17, 1346). The loss of their king and the destruction of a fine army took the heart out of the resistance of the Scots, who for many years to come could give their French allies little assistance. In 1347 Edward made a short truce with King Philip: even after his late victories he felt his strength much strained, his Truce with treasury being empty, and his army exhausted by the France. year-long siege of Calais. But he would have returned The Black to the struggle without delay had it not been for Death. the dreadful calamity of the " Black Death," which fell upon France and England, as upon all Europe, in the years 1348–1349. The disease, on which the 14th century bestowed this name, was the bubonic See also:plague, still See also:familiar in the East. After devastating western See also:Asia, it reached the Mediterranean ports of Europe in 1347, and spread across the continent in a few months.

It was said that in France, Italy and England a third of the population perished, and though this estimate may be somewhat exaggerated, local records of unimpeachable accuracy show that it cannot be very far from the truth. The bishop's registers of the See also:

diocese of Norwich show that many parishes had three and some four successive vicars admitted in eighteen months. In the manor rolls it is not uncommon to find whole families swept away, so that no heir can be detected to their holdings. Among the monastic orders, whose crowded common life seems to have been particularly favourable to the spread of the plague, there were cases where a whole community, from the See also:abbot down to the novices, perished. The upper classes are said to have suffered less than the poor; but the king's daughter See also:Joan and two archbishops of Canterbury were among the victims. The long continuance of the visitation, which as a rule took six or nine months to work out its virulence in any particular spot, seems to have cowed and demoralized society. Though it first spread from the ports of Bristol and See also:Weymouth in the summer of 1348, it had not finished its destruction in northern England till 1350, and only spread into Scotland in the summer of that year. When the worst of the plague was over, and panic had died down, it was found that the social conditions of England had been considerably affected by the visitation. The condi- Economic tion of the realm had been See also:stable and prosperous during and social the earlier years of Edward III., the drain on its re- effects of sources caused by heavywar-taxation havingbeen more the Biack than compensated by the increased wealth that arose Dearh from growing commerce and developing See also:industries. The victory of Sluys, which gave England the command of the seas, had been a great landmark in the economic no less than in the naval history of this island. But the basis of society was shaken by the Black Death; the kingdom was still essentially an agricultural community, worked on the manorial system; and the sudden disappearance of a third of the labouring hands by which that system had been maintained threw everything into disorder. The landowners found thousands of the crofts on which their villeins had been wont to dwell vacant, and could not fill them with new tenants.

Even if they exacted the full rigour of service from the survivors, they could not get their broad See also:

demesne lands properly tilled. The landless labourers, who might have been hired to supply the deficiency, were so reduced in numbers that they could command, if free competition prevailed, double and triple rates of payment, compared with their earnings in the days before the plague. Hence there arose, almost at once, a bitter strife between the lords of manors and the labouring class, both landholding and landless. The lords wished to exact all possible services from the former, and to pay only the old two or three pence a day to the latter. The villeins, as hard hit as their masters, resented the tightening of old duties, which in some cases had already been commuted for small money rents during the prosperous years preceding the plague. The landless men formed combinations, disputed with the landlords, and asked and often got twice as much as the old rates, despite of the murmurings of the employer. After a short experience of these difficulties the king and council, whose sympathies were naturally with the landholders, issued an ordinance forbidding workmen of any kind The to demand more than they had been wont to receive statute of before 1348. This was followed up by the famous Labourers. Statute of Labourers of 1351, which fixed rates for all See also:wages practically identical with those of the times before the Black Death. Those workmen who refused to accept them were to be imprisoned, while employers who went behind the backs of their See also:fellows and secretly paid higher sums were to be punished by heavy fines. Later additions to the statute were devised to terrorize the labourer, by adding stripes and See also:branding to his punishment, if he still remained recalcitrant or absconded. And landowners were empowered to seize all vagrant able-bodied men, and to compel them to work at the statutory wages.

As some compensation for the low pay of the workmen, parliament tried to bring down the See also:

price of commodities to their former level, for (like labour) all manufactured articles had gone up immensely in value. Thirty years of friction followed, while the parliament and the ruling classes tried in a spasmodic way to enforce the statute, and the peasantry strove to evade it. It proved impossible to carry out the scheme; the labourers were too many and too cunning to be crushed. If driven over hard they absconded to the towns, where hands were needed as much as in the country-side, or migrated to districts where the statute was laxly ad-ministered. Gradually the landowners discovered that the only practical way out of their difficulties was to give up the old custom of working the manorial demesne by the forced labour of their villeins, and to cut it up into farms which were rented out to free tenants, and cultivated by them. In the course of two Edward Invades France. Capture of Calais. generations the " farmers " who paid rent for these holdings became more and more numerous, and demesne land tilled by villein-service grew more and more rare. But enough old-fashioned landlords remained to keep up the struggle with the peasants to the end of the 14th century and beyond, and the number of times that the Statute of Labourers was re-enacted and recast was enormous. Nevertheless the struggle turned gradually to the advantage of the labourer, and ended in the creation of the sturdy and prosperous farming See also:yeomanry who were the strength of the realm for several centuries to come. One immediate consequence of the " Black Death " was the renewal of the truce between England and France by repeated agreements which lasted from 1347 to 1355. During this interval Philip of France died, in 1350, and was succeeded by his son John.

The war did not entirely cease, but became local and spasmodic. In Brittany the factions which supported the two claimants to the ducal title were so embittered that they never laid down their arms. In 1351 the French noblesse of See also:

Picardy, apparently without their master's knowledge or consent, made an attempt to surprise Calais, which was beaten off with some difficulty by King Edward in person. There was also constant bickering on the borders of Guienne. But the main forces Renewalof on both sides were not brought into action till the the war series of truces ran out in 1355. From that time with onward the English took the offensive with great France. vigour. Edward, prince of Wales, ravaged See also:Languedoc as far as the Mediterranean, while his younger brother John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, executed a less ambitious raid in Picardy and Artois. In the south this campaign marked real progress, not mere objectless plunder, for it was followed by the reconquest of great districts in Perigord and the See also:Agenais, which had been lost to England since the 13th century. A similar double invasion of France led to even greater results in the following year, 1356. While Lancaster landed in Normandy, and with the aid of local rebels occupied the greater part of the peninsula of the Cotentin, the prince of Wales accomplished greater things on the borders of Aquitaine. After executing a great circular sweep through Perigord, See also:Limousin and See also:Berry, he was returning to Bordeaux laden with plunder, when' he was intercepted by the king of France near Poitiers. The of battle that followed was the most astonishing of all Poitiers.

. the English victories during the Hundred Years' War. The odds against the prince were far heavier than those of Crecy, but by taking up a strong position and using the national tactics which combined the use of archery and dismounted men-at-arms, the younger Edward not merely beat off his assailants in a long defensive fight, but finally charged out upon them, scattered them, and took King John prisoner (Sept. 19, 1356). This fortunate capture put an enormous advantage in the hands of the English; for John, a facile and selfish prince, was The ready to buy his freedom by almost any concessions. English He signed two successive treaties which gave such ravage advantageous terms to Edward III. that the dauphin France. Charles, who was acting as regent, and the French states-general refused to confirm them. This drove the English king to put still further pressure on the enemy; in 1359 he led out from Calais the largest English army that had been seen during the war, devastated all northern France as far as See also:

Reims and the borders of See also:Burgundy, and then—continuing the campaign through the heart of the winter—presented himself before the gates of Paris and ravaged the Ile de France. This brought the regent Charles and his counsellors to the verge of despair; they yielded, and on the 8th of May 136o, signed an agreement at Bretigny near See also:Chartres, by which nearly all King Edward's demands were granted. These preliminaries were ratified by the definitive peace of Calais (Oct. 24, 1360), which brought the first stage of the Hundred Years' War to an end. By this treaty King Edward formally gave up his claim to the French throne, which he had always intended to use merely as an asset for barter, and was to receive in return not only a sum of 3,000,000 gold crowns for King John's personal ransom, butan immense cession of territory which—in southern France at least—almost restored the old boundaries of the time of Henry II. The duchy of Aquitaine was reconstructed, so as to include not only the lands that Edward had inherited, and his See also:recent conquests, but all Poitou, Limousin, See also:Angoumois, See also:Quercy, See also:Rouergue and Saintonge—a full half of France south of the Loire.

This vast duchy the English king bestowed not long after on his son Edward, the See also:

victor of Poitiers, who reigned there as a vassal-sovereign, owing homage to England but ad-ministering his possessions in his own right. In northern France, Calais and the county of See also:Guines, and also the isolated county of Ponthieu, the inheritance of the wife of Edward I., were ceded to the English crown. All these regions, it must be noted, were to be held for the future free of any homage or acknowledgment of allegiance to an overlord, " in See also:perpetuity, and in the manner in which the kings of France had held them." There was to be an end to the power of the courts of Paris to harass the duke of Aquitaine, by using the rights of the suzerain to interfere with the vassal's subjects. It was hoped that for the future the insidious legal warfare which had been used with such effect by the French kings would be effectually prevented. To complete the picture of the triumph of Edward III. at this, the culminating point of his reign, it must be mentioned that some time before the peace of Calais he had made terms suhmiswith Scotland. David Bruce was to cede Roxburgh See also:sion of and Berwick, but to keep the rest of his dominions on David of condition of paying a ransom of 100,000 marks. This Scotland. sum could never be raised, and Edward always had it in his power to bring pressure to bear on the king of Scots by demanding the instalments, which were always in arrear. David gave no further trouble; indeed he became so friendly to England that. he offered to proclaim Lionel of See also:Clarence, Edward's second son, as his heir, and would have done so but for the vigorous opposition of his parliament. The English people had expected that a sort of See also:Golden Age would follow the conclusion of the peace with Scotland a,nd France. Freed from the war-taxes which had vexed them for the last twenty years, they would be able Economic to repair the ravages of the Black Death, and to de- Ennglaand. velop the commercial advantages which had been won at Sluys, and secured by the dominion of the seas which they had held. ever since. In some respects this expectation was not deceived; the years that followed 1360 seem to have been prosperous at home, despite the continued friction arising from the Statute of Labourers. The towns would seem to have fared better than the countryside, partly indeed at its expense, for the discontented peasantry migrated in large numbers to the centres of population where newly-developed manufactures were calling for more hands.

The See also:

weaving See also:industry, introduced into the eastern counties by the king's invitation to Flemish settlers, was making England something more than a mere producer of raw material for export. The seaports soon recovered from their losses in the Black Death, and English shipping was beginning to appear in the distant seas of See also:Portugal and the Baltic. Nothing illustrates the growth of English wealth better than the fact that the kingdom had, till the time of Edward III., contrived to conduct all its commerce with a currency of small silver, but that within thirty years of his introduction of a gold coinage in 1343, the English " See also:noble was being struck in enormous quantities. It invaded all the markets of western Europe, and became the prototype of the gold issues of the Netherlands, Scotland, and even parts of Germany It is in the latter years of Edward III. that we find the first forerunners of that class of English merchant princes who were to be such a marked feature in the succeeding reigns. The Poles of See also:Hull, whose descendants rose in three generations to ducal rank, were the earliest specimens of their class. The poet See also:Chaucer may serve as a humbler example of the rise of the burgher class—the son of a vintner, he became the father of a knight, and the ancestor, through female descents, of many baronial families. The second half of the 14th century is the first period in English history in which we can detect a distinct rise in the importance Peace of Bretigny. of the commercial as opposed to the landed interest. The latter, hard hit by the manorial difficulties that followed the plague of 1348–1349, found their rents stationary or even diminishing, while the price of the commodities from which the former made their wealth had permanently risen. As to intellectual vigour, the age that produced two minds of such marked originality in different spheres as Wycliffe and Chaucer must not be despised, even if it failed to carry out all the promise of the 13th century. For a few years after the peace of 136o the political influence of Edward III. in western Europe seemed to be supreme. France, prostrated by the results of the English raids, by See also:peasant revolts, and municipal and baronial turbulence, did not begin to recover strength till the thriftless king John had died (1364) and had been succeeded by his capable if unchivalrous son Charles V.

Yet the state of the English dominions on the continent was not 'satisfactory; in building up the vast duchy of Aquitaine Edward had made a See also:

radical mistake. Instead of contenting himself with creating a homogeneous Gascon state, which might have grown togethet into a solid unit, he had annexed broad regions which had been for a century and a half united to France, and had been entirely assimilated to her. From thefirst Poitou, Quercy, Rouergue and the Limousin chafed beneath the English yoke; the noblesse in especial found the comparatively orderly and constitutional governance to which they were subjected most intolerable. They waited for the first opportunity to revolt, and meanwhile murmured against every act of theft duke, the prince of Wales, though he did his best to behave as a gracious sovereign. The younger Edward ended by losing his See also:health and his wealth in an unnecessary war beyond the Pyrenees. He was persuaded by the exiled Peter the Cruel, king of Castile, to restore The Black him to the throne which he had forfeited by his mis- Prince in Spain. government. In 1367 he gathered a great army, entered Castile, defeated the usurper Henry of Trastamara at the battle of Najera, and restored his ally. But Peter, when once re-established as king, forgot his obligations and left the prince burdened with the whole expense of the campaign. Edward left Spain with a discontented and unpaid army, and had himself contracted the seeds of a disease which was to leave him an invalid for the rest of his life. To pay his debts he was obliged to resort to heavy taxation in Aquitaine, which gave his discontented subjects in Poitou and the other outlying districts an excuse for the rebellion that they had been for some time meditating. In 1368 his greatest vassals, the counts of See also:Armagnac, Perigord and Comminges, displayed their disloyalty by appealing to the king of France as their suzerain against the legality of Edward's imposts. The French overlordship had been formally abolished by the treaty of 1360, so this appeal amounted to open rebellion.

And when Charles V. accepted it, and cited Edward to appear before his See also:

parlement to answer the complaints of the counts, he was challenging England to renewed war. He found a preposterous excuse for repudiating the treaty by which he was bound, by declaring that some details had been omitted in its formal ratification. The Hundred Years' War, therefore, broke out again in 1369, after an interval of nine years. Edward III. assumed once more Renewal the title of king of France, while Charles V., in the oftee war usual style, declared that the whole duchy of Aquiwith See also:taine had been forfeited for treason and rebellion on France. the part of its present holder. The second period of war, which was to last till the death of the English king, and for some years after, was destined to prove wholly disastrous to England. All the conditions had changed since 1360. Edward, though only in his fifty-seventh year, was entering into a pre-mature and decrepit old age, in which he became the prey of unworthy favourites, male and female. The men of the 14th century, who commanded armies and executed coups d'ttat at eighteen, were often worn out by sixty. The guidance of the war should have fallen into the hands of his eldest son, the victor of Poitiers and Najera, but the younger Edward had never re-covered from the fatigues of his See also:Spanish campaign; his diseasehaving developed into a form of See also:dropsy, he had become a con-firmed invalid and could no longer take the field. The charge of the military operations of the English armies had passed to John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, the king's younger son, a prince far inferior in capacity to his father and brother. Though not destitute of good impulses Lancaster was hasty, improvident and obstinate; he was unfortunate in his choice of friends, for he allied himself to all his father's unscrupulous dependents.

He was destitute of military skill, and wrecked army after army by attempting hard tasks at inappropriate times and by mistaken methods, Despite of all checks and disasters he remained active, self-confident and ambitious, and, since he had acquired a complete control over his father, he had ample opportunity to mismanage the political and military affairs of England. Lancaster's See also:

strategy, in the early years of the renewed war, consisted mainly of attempts to See also:wear down the force of France by devastating raids; he hoped to provoke the enemy to battle by striking at the heart of his realm, but of charathecter ~' war never achieved his purpose. Warned by the disasters of Crecy and Poitiers, Charles V. and his great captain See also:Bertrand du Guesclin would never commit themselves to an engagement in the open field. They let the English invaders pass by, garrisoning the towns but abandoning the countryside. Since Lancaster, in his great circular raids, had never the leisure to sit down to a siege—generally a matter of long months in the 14th century—he repeatedly crossed France leaving a train of ruined villages behind him, but having accomplished nothing else save the exhaustion of his own army. For the French always followed him at a cautious distance, cutting off his stragglers, and restricting the area of his ravages by keeping flying columns all around his path. But while the duke was executing useless marches across France, the outlying lands of Aquitaine were falling away, one after the other, to the enemy. The limit of the territory which still remained loyal was ever shrinking, and what was once lost was hardly ever regained. Almost the only reconquest made was that of the city of Limoges, which was stormed in September 1370 by the troops of the Black Prince, who rose from his sick-bed to strike his last blow at the rebels. His success did almost as much harm as good to his cause, for the deliberate sack of the city was carried out with such ruthless severity that it roused wild wrath rather than terror in the neighbouring regions. Next spring the prince returned to England, feeling himself physically unable to ad-minister or defend his duchy any longer. The greater part of Poitou, Quercy and Rouergue had been lost, and the English cause was everywhere losing ground, when a new danger was developed.

Since Sluys the enemy had never disputed the command of the seas; but in 1372 a Spanish fleet joined the French, and destroyed off La Rochelle a squadron which was bringing reinforcements for Guienne. The disaster was the direct result of the campaign of Najera—for Henry of Trastamara. who had long since de-throned and slain his brother Peter the Cruel, remained a consistent foe of England. From this date onward Franco-Spanish fleets were perpetually to be met not only in the Bay of Biscay but in the Channel; they made the voyage to Bordeaux unsafe, and often executed descents on the shores of Kent, See also:

Sussex, Devon and Cornwall. It was to no effect that, in the year after the battle of La Rochelle,Lancaster carried out the last, the most expensive, and the most fruitless of his great raids across France. He marched from Calais to Bordeaux, inflicted great misery on Picardy, See also:Champagne and Berry, and left half his army dead by the way. This did not prevent Bertrand du Guesclin from expelling from his dominions John of Brittany, the one ally whom King Edward possessed in France, or from pursuing a consistent career of petty conquest in the heart of Aquitaine. By 1374 little was left of the great possessions which the English had held beyond the Channel save Calais, and the coast slip from Bordeaux to Bayonne, which formed the only loyal part of the duchy of Guienne. Next year King Edward sued for peace—he failed to obtain it, finding the French terms too hard for See also:acceptance English rule in France. English reverses. but a truce at least was signed at See also:Bruges (Jan. 1375) which endured till a few weeks before his death. These two last years of Edward's reign were filled with an episode of domestic strife, which had considerable constitutional importance.

The nation ascribed the series of disasters Domestic which had filled the space from 1369 to 1375 entirely strife. to the maladministration of Lancaster and the king's favourites, failing to see that it was largely due to the mere fact that England was not strong enough to hold down Aquitaine, when France was administered by a capable king and served by a great general. Hence there arose, both in and out of parliament, a violent agitation for the removal of Lancaster from power, and the punishment of the favourites, who were believed, with complete justification, to be misusing the royal name for their own private profit. Among the leaders of this agitation were the clerical ministers whom John of Gaunt had expelled from office in 1371, and chiefly William of Wykeham, bishop of Winchester, the late chancellor; they were helped by Edmund Mortimer, earl of March, a personal enemy of Lancaster, and could count on the assistance of the prince of Wales when he was well enough to take a part in politics. The greater part of the House of Commons was on their side, and on the whole they may be regarded as the party of constitutional protest against maladministration. But there was another movement on foot at the same time, which cut across this political agitation in the most bewildering fashion. Protests against the corruption of the Church and the interference of the papacy in national affairs had always been rife in, England. At this moment they were more prevalent than ever, largely in consequence of the way in which the popes at See also:

Avignon had made themselves the allies and tools of the kings of France. The Statutes of See also:Praemunire and Provisors had been passed a few years before (1351–1365) to check papal pretensions. There was a strong anti-clerical party, whose practical aim was to fill the coffers of the state by large See also:measures of disendowment and confiscations of Church property. The intellectual head of this party at the time was John Wycliffe, a famous Oxford Wycliffe. teacher, and for some time master of Balliol See also:College.

In his lectures and sermons he was always laying stress on the unsatisfactory state of the national church and the infamous corruption of the papacy. The See also:

doctrine which first made him famous, and commended him to all members of the anti-clerical faction, was that unworthy holders of spiritual endowments ought to be dispossessed of them, because " dominion " should depend on " See also:grace." Churchmen, small and great, as he held, had been corrupted, because they had fallen away from the early Christian idea of apostolic poverty. Instead of discharging their proper functions, bishops and abbots had become statesmen or wealthy barons, and took no interest in anything save politics. The monasteries, with their vast possessions, had become See also:cor- porations of landlords, instead of associations for prayer and good works. The papacy, with its secular ambitions, and its insatiable greed for money, was the worst abuse of all. A bad pope, and most popes were bad, was the true See also:Antichrist, since he was always overruling the divine law of the scriptures by his human ordinances. Every man, as Wycliffe taught—using the feudal analogies of contemporary society—is God's tenant-in- chief, directly responsible for his acts to his overlord; the pope is always thrusting himself in between, like a See also:mesne-tenant, and destroying the touch between God and man by his interference. Sometimes his commands are merely presumptuous; sometimes —as when, for example, he preaches See also:crusades against Christians for purely secular reasons—they are the most horrible form of See also:blasphemy. Wycliffe at a later period of his life developed views on doctrinal matters, not connected with his original thesis about the relations between Church and State, and foreshadowed most of the leading tenets of the reformers of the 16th century. But in 1376–1377 he was known merely as the outspoken critic of the " Caesarean clergy " and the papacy. He had a following of enthusiastic disciples at Oxford, and scattered adherents both among the burghers and the See also:knighthood, the nucleus of the party that afterwards became famous as the See also:Lollards. But they had not yet differentiated themselves from the body of those who were merely anti-clerical, without being committed to any theories of religious reform.

Since Wycliffe was, above all things, the enemy of the political clergy of high estate, and since those clergy were precisely the leaders of the attack upon John of Gaunt, it came to pass that hatred of a common foe drew the duke and John of Gaunt and the See also:

doctor together for a space. There was a strange Wycliffe, alliance between the advocate of clerical reform, and the practical exponent of secular misgovernment. The only point on which they were agreed was that it would be highly desirable to See also:strip the Church of most of her endowments, in order to fill the exchequer of the state. Lancaster hoped to use Wycliffe as his mouthpiece against his enemies; Wycliffe hoped to see Lancaster disendowing bishops and monasteries and defying the pope. Hence the attempt of the political bishops to get Wycliffe condemned as a heretic became inextricably mixed with the attempt of the constitutional party, to which the bishops belonged, to evict the duke from his position of first councillor to the king and director of the policy of the realm. The struggle began in the parliament of 1376, called by the anti-Lancastrian party the " Good Parliament." Headed by the earl of March, William See also:Courtenay, bishop of London, The and Sir Peter de la See also:Mare, the daring See also:speaker of the "Good House of Commons, the duke's enemies began their menit.~~ campaign by accusing the king's ministers and favourites of corruption. Here they were on safe ground, for the misdeeds of Lord Latimer—the king's chamberlain, Lord Neville—his steward, Richard Lyons—his financial See also:agent, and Alice Perrers—his greedy and shameless See also:mistress, had been so flagrant that it was hard for Lancaster to overthrow defend them. In face of the evidence brought forward of the the old king and his son had to abandon their friends king's to the angry parliament. See also:Latimer and See also:Lyons were favourites. condemned to imprisonment and forfeiture of their goods, Alice See also:Perrers was banished from court. Encouraged by this victory, the parliament passed on to constitutional reforms, forced on the king a council of twelve peers nominated by themselves, who were to exercise over him much the same control that the lords ordainers had held over his father, and ionstitr. ~ tonal compelled him to assent to a long list of petitions reforms. which, if properly carried out, would have removed most of the practical grievances of the nation.

Having so done they dispersed, not guessing that Lancester had yielded so easily because he was set on undoing their work the moment that they were gone. This, however, was the case; after the shortest of intervals the duke executed something like a coup d'elat. In his father's name he released Latimer and Lyons, dismissed the John of council of twelve, imprisoned Peter de la Mare, Gaunt re-sequestrated the temporalities of Bishop Wykeham, establishes and sent the earl of March out of the realm. Alice the royal Perrers took possession again of the king, and all his power. corrupt courtiers came back to him. A royal See also:

edict declared the statutes of the " Good Parliament " null and void. Lan-caster would never have dared to defy public opinion and See also:challenge the constitutional party to a life-and-death struggle in this fashion, had it not been that his brother the prince of Wales had died while the " Good Parliament " was sitting; thus the opposition had been deprived of their strongest support. The prince's heir was a mere child, Richard of Bordeaux, aged only nine. It was feared by some that Duke John might carry his ambitions so far as to. aim at the throne—he could do what he pleased with his doting father, and flaws might have been picked in the marriage of the Black Prince and his wife Joan of Kent, who were cousins, and therefore within the "prohibited degrees." As a matter of fact Lancaster was a more honest man than his enemies suspected; he hastened to acknowledge his little nephew's rights, acknowledged him as prince of Wales, and introduced him as his grandfather's heir before the parliament of January 1377. The character of this body was a proof of the great strength Agitation against the Church. Death of the Black Prince. of the royal name and power even in days when See also:parliamentary institutions had been long in existence, and were supposed to act as a check on the crown. To legalize his arbitrary acts Duke John dared to summon the estates together, after he had issued stringent orders to the sheriffs to exclude his enemies and return his friends when the members for the Commons were chosen.

He obtained a house of the complexion that he desired, and having a strong following among the peers actually succeeded in undoing all the work of 1376. No sign of trouble or rebellion followed, the opposition being destitute of a fighting leader. March had left the realm; Bishop Wykeham showed an unworthy sub- servience by suing for pardon through the See also:

mediation of Alice Perrers. Only Bishop Courtenay refused to be terrorized; he chose this moment to open a campaign against the duke's ally, John Wycliffe, who was arraigned for See also:heresy before the ecclesi- astical courts. His trial, however, ended in a scandalous fiasco. Lancaster and his friend Lord See also:Percy came to St See also:Paul's, and so insulted and browbeat the bishop, that the proceedings de- generated into a riot, and reached no conclusion (Feb. 19). Courtenay dared not recommence them, and Lancaster ruled as he pleased till his father, five months later, died. Deserted by his worthless courtiers and plundered on his death- Death of bed by his greedy mistress, the victor of Sluys and Rd ward See also:Ili. Crecy sank into an unhonoured grave. It was a relief to the nation that he was gone. Yet there was a general feeling that See also:chaos might follow.

If Lancaster should justify the malevolent rumours that were afloat by making a snatch at the crown, the last state of the realm might be worse than the first. Duke John, however, was a better man than his enemies supposed. He was loyal to the crown according to his lights, and Richard /L showed a chivalrous self-denial that had hardly been expected from him. He saluted his little nephew as king without a moment's hesitation, though he was aware that with the commencement of a new reign his own dictator-ship had come to an end. The princess of Wales, in whose hands the young Richard II. was placed, had never been his friend, and was surrounded by adherents of her deceased husband, who belonged to the constitutional party. Disarmed, however, by the duke's frank submission they wisely resolved not to push him to extremes, and the first council which was appointed to act for the new monarch was a sort of " See also:

coalition See also:ministry " in which Lancaster's followers as well as his foes were represented. For that very reason it was lacking in strength and unity of purpose, and proved lamentably incapable of dealing with the problems of the moment. Of these the most pressing was the renewal of the French war; the truce had expired a few weeks before the death of Edward III., and the new reign began with a series of military disasters. The French fleet landed in great force in Sussex, burnt See also:Rye and Hastings and routed the shire levies. Simultaneously the See also:seneschal of Aquitaine was defeated in battle, and See also:Bergerac, the last great See also:town in the inland which remained in English hands, was captured by the duke of Anjou. The first parliament of Richard II. met in October under the most gloomy auspices. It showed its See also:temper by taking up the First work of the " Good Parliament." Lancaster's ad- See also:par/Ia- herents were turned out of the council; the persons meat of condemned in 1376 were declared incapable of serving Richard. in it; Alice Perrers was sentenced to banishment Reforms.

and forfeiture, and the little king was made to repudiate the See also:

declaration whereby his uncle had quashed the statutes of 1376 by declaring that " no act of parliament can be repealed save with parliament's consent." John of Gaunt bowed before the storm, retired to his estates, and for some time took little part in affairs of state. Unfortunately the new government proved wholly unable either to conduct the struggle with France successfully or to See also:pluck up courage to make a humiliating peace—the only wise course before them. The nation was too proud to accept defeat, and persevered in the unhappy attempt to reverse thefortunes of war. An almost unbroken series of petty disasters marked the first three years of King Richard. The worst was the failure of the last great devastating raid which the English launched against France. Thomas of Woodstock, the youngest son of Edward III., took a powerful army to Calais, and marched through Picardy and Champagne, past See also:Orleans, and finally to See also:Rennes in Brittany, but accomplished nothing save the ruin of his own troops and the wasting of a vast sum of money. Meanwhile taxation was heavy, the whole nation was seething with discontent, and—what was worst—no way was visible out of the miserable situation; ministers and councillors were repeatedly displaced, but their successors always proved equally incompetent to find a remedy. This period of murmuring and misery culminated in the Great Revolt of 1381, a phenomenon whose origins must be sought in the most complicated causes, but whose outbreak was due in the main to a general feeling that the realm RThevole Great t of was being misgoverned, and that some one must be 1381. made responsible for its maladministration. It was actually provoked by the unwise and unjust See also:poll-tax of one See also:shilling a head on all adult persons, voted by the parliament of Northampton in November 1380. The last poll-tax had been carefully graduated on a sliding scale so as to press lightly'on the poorest classes; in this one a shilling for each person had to be exacted from every township, though it was provided that " the strong should help the weak " to a certain extent. But in hundreds of villages there were no " strong " residents, and the poorest cottager had to pay his three groats. The peasantry defended themselves by the simple device of understating the numbers of their families; the returns made it appear that the adult population of England had gone down from 1,355,000 to 896,000 since the poll-tax of 1379.

Thereupon the government sent out commissioners to revise the returns and exact the missing shillings. Their appearance led to a series of widespread and preconcerted riots, which soon spread over all England from the Wash to the Channel, and in a few days developed into a formidable rebellion. The poll-tax was no more than the spark which fired the mine; it merely provided a good general grievance on which all malcontents could unite. In the districts which took arms two main causes of insurrection may be differentiated; the first and the most widespread was the discontent of the rural population with the landowners and the Statute of Labourers. Their aim was to abolish all villein-service, and to wring from their lords the See also:

commutation of all manorial customs' and obligations for a small rent—fourpence an acre was generally the sum suggested. But there was a simultaneous outbreak in many urban districts. In Winchester, London, St Albans, Canterbury, Bury, See also:Beverley, Scarborough and many other places the rioting was as violent as in the countryside. Here the object of the insurgents was in most cases to break down the local oligarchy, who engrossed all municipal office and oppressed the meaner citizens; but in less numerous instances their end was to win charters from lords (almost always ecclesiastical lords) who had hitherto refused to grant them. But it must not be forgotten that there was also a tinge of purely political discontent about the rising; the insurgents everywhere proclaimed their intention to destroy " traitors," of whom the most generally condemned were the chancellor, Archbishop See also:Sudbury, and the treasurer, Sir Robert See also:Hailes, the two persons most responsible for the levy of the poll-tax. Often the rebels added the name of John of Gaunt to the list, looking upon him as the person ultimately responsible for the mismanagement of the war and the misgovernment of the realm. It must be added that though the leaders of the revolt were for the most part local demagogues, the creatures of the moment, there were among them a few fanatics like the " mad priest of Kent," John See also:Ball, who had long preached socialist doctrines from the old See also:text: " When Main delved and See also:Eve span Who was then the See also:gentleman?" and clamoured for the abolition of all See also:differences of rank, status and property. Though many clerics were found among the rebels, it does not seem that any of them were Wyclifiites, or that The French war.

the reformer's teaching had played any part in exciting the peasantry at this time. No contemporary authority ascribes the rising to the Lollards. The riots had begun, almost simultaneously in Kent and Essex: from thence they spread through East Anglia and the home counties. In the west and north there were only isolated and sporadic outbreaks, confined to a few turbulent towns. In the countryside the insurrection was accompanied by wholesale burnings of manor-rolls, the hunting down of unpopular bailiffs and landlords, and a special crusade against the commissioners of the poll-tax and the justices who had been enforcing the Statute of Labourers. There was more See also:

arson and blackmailing than murder, though some prominent persons perished, such as the judge, Sir John See also:Cavendish, and the prior of Bury. In many regions the rising was purely disorderly and destitute of organization. This was not, however, the case in Kent and London. wat See also:Tyler. The See also:mob which had gathered at See also:Maidstone and Canter- bury marched on the capital many thousands strong, headed by a local demagogue named Wat Tyler, whom they had chosen as their captain; his most prominent lieutenant was the preacher John Ball. They announced their intention of executing all " traitors," seizing the person of the king, and setting-up a new government for the realm. The royal council and ministers showed grievous incapacity and cowardice—they made no attempt to raise an army, and opened negotiations with the rebels. While these were in progress the malcontent party in London, headed by three aldermen, opened the gates of the city to Tyler and his horde.

They poured in, and, joined by the London mob, sacked John of Gaunt's See also:

palace of the Savoy, the See also:Temple, and many other buildings, while the ministers took refuge with the young king in the Tower. It was well known that not only the capital and the neighbouring counties but all eastern England was ablaze, and the council in despair sent out the young king to parley with Tyler at Mile End. The rebels at first demanded no more than that Richard should declare villeinage abolished, and that all feudal dues and services should be commuted for a rent of fourpence an acre. This was readily conceded, and charters were drawn up to that effect and sealed by the king. But, while the meeting was still going on, Tyler went off to the Tower with a part of his horde, entered the for-tress unopposed, and murdered the unhappy chancellor, Arch-bishop Sudbury, the treasurer, and several victims more. This was only the beginning of massacre. Instead of dispersing with their charters, as did many of the peasants, 'Tyler and his con-federates ran riot through London, burning houses and slaying lawyers, officials, foreign merchants and other unpopularr persons. This had the effect of frightening the propertied classes in the city, who had hitherto observed a timid neutrality, and turned public opinion against the insurgents. Next day the rebel leaders again invited the king to a See also:conference, in the open space of Smithfield, and laid before him a programme very different from that propounded at Mile End. Tyler demanded that all differences of rank and status should cease, that all church lands should be confiscated and divided up among the laity, that the game laws should be abolished, and that " no lord should any longer hold lordship except civilly." Apparently he was set on provoking a refusal, and thus getting an excuse for seizing the person of the king. But matters went otherwise than he had expected; when he waxed unmannerly, and unsheathed his See also:dagger to strike one of the royal retinue who had dared to answer him back, the mayor of London, William See also:Walworth, drew his See also:cutlass and cut him down. The mob strung their bows, and were about to shoot down the king and his See also:suite.

But Richard—who showed astounding See also:

nerve and presence of mind for a lad of fourteen—cantered up to them shouting that he would be their chief and captain and would give them their rights. The conference was continued, but, while it was in progress, the mayor brought up the whole civic militia of London, who had taken arms when they saw that the triumph of the rebels meant anarchy, and rescued the king out of the hands of the mob. Seeing such a formidable body of armed men opposed to them, the insurgents dispersed—without theirreckless and ready-witted captain they were helpless (June 15, 1381). This was the turning-point of the rebellion; within a few days the council had collected a considerable army, which marched through Essex scattering such rebel bands as still held together. Kent was pacified at the same Supprestime; and Henry Despenser, the warlike bishop of the rising. Sting. Norwich, made a separate campaign against the East Anglian insurgents, defeating them at the skirmish of North Walsham, and See also:hanging the local leader Geoffrey See also:Lister, who had declared himself " king of the commons " (June 25, 1381). After this there was nothing remaining save to punish the leaders of the revolt; a good many scores of them were hanged, though the vengeance exacted does not seem to have been greater than was justified by the numerous murders and burnings of which they had been guilty; the fanatic Ball was, of course, among the first to suffer. On the 30th of August the rough methods of See also:martial law were suspended, and on the 14th of December the king issued an amnesty to all save certain leaders who had hitherto escaped capture. A parliament had been called in November; it voted that all the charters given by the king at Mile End were null and void, no manumissions or grants of privileges could have been valid without the consent of the estates of the realm, " and for their own parts they would never consent to such, of their own free will nor otherwise, even to save themselves from sudden death." The rebellion, therefore, had failed either to abolish villeinage in the countryside or to end municipal oligarchy in the towns, and many lords took the opportunity of the time of Decline of reaction in order to revindicate old claims over their the bondsmen. Nevertheless See also:serfdom continued to decline manorial all through the latter years of the 14th century, and system. was growing obsolete in the 15th. This, however, was the result not of the great revolt of 1381, but of economic causes working out their inevitable progress.

The manorial system was already doomed, and the rent-paying tenant farmers, who had begun to appear after the Black Death, gradually superseded the villeins as the normal type of peasantry during the two generations that followed the outbreak that is generally known as " Wat Tyler's rebellion." King Richard, though he had shown such courage and ready resources at Smithfield, was still only a lad of fourteen. For three years more he was under the control of tutors and See also:

governors appointed by his council. Their rule and wyc/iffethe was incompetent, but the chief danger to the realm Louards. had passed away when both Charles V. of France and his great captain Du Guesclin died in 1380. The new king at Paris was a young boy, whose councils were swayed by a See also:knot of quarrelsome and selfish uncles; the vigour of the attack on England began to slacken. Nevertheless there was no change in the fortune of war, which continued to be disastrous, if on a smaller scale than before. The chief domestic event of the time was the attack of the clerical party on Wycliffe and his followers. The reformer had begun to develop dogmatic views, in addition to his old theories about the relations of Church and State. When he proceeded to deny the doctrine of See also:transubstantiation, to assert the all-sufficiency of the Scriptures as a rule of life, to denounce saint-worship, pilgrimages, and indulgences, and to declare, the pope to be Antichrist, he frightened his old supporter John of Gaunt and the politicians of the anti-clerical clique. They ceased to support him, and his followers became a See also:sect rather than a political party. He and his disciples were expelled from Oxford, and ere long the bishops began to See also:arrest and try them for heresy. Wycliffe himself, strange to say, was not molested. He survived to publish his See also:translation of the.See also:Bible and to See also:die in peace in December 1383.

But his followers were being hunted, and imprisoned or forced to recant, all through the later years of Richard II. Yet they continued to multiply, and exercised at times considerable influence; though they had few supporters among the baronage, yet among the lesser gentry and still more among the burgher class and in the universities they were strong. It was not till the next reign, when the 1383-1399] bishops succeeded in calling in the crown to their aid, and passed the statute De heretico comburendo, that Lollardy ceased to flourish. King Richard meanwhile had grown to man's estate, and had resolved to take the reins of power into his own hands. He was wayward, high-spirited and self-confident. ' He See also:

Richards wished to restore the royal powers which had slipped raonal u into the hands of the council and parliament during his minorjty, and had small doubts of his capacity to restore it. His chosen See also:instruments were two men whom his enemies called his " favourites," though it was absurd to apply the name either to an elderly statesman like See also:Michael de la See also:Pole, who was made chancellor in 1384, or to Robert de Vere, earl of Oxford, a young noble of the See also:oldest lineage, who was the king's other confidant. Neither of them was an upstart, and both, the one from his experience and the other from his high station, were persons who might legitimately aspire to a place among the advisers of the king. But Richard wds tactless; he openly flouted his two uncles, John of Gaunt and Thomas of Woodstock, and took no pains to conciliate either the baronage or the commons. His autocratic airs and his ostentatious prefer- ence for his confidants—of whom he made the one earl of See also:Suffolk and the other See also:marquess of Dublin—provoked both lords and commons. Pole was impeached on a ground- less charge of corruption and condemned, but Richard at once pardoned him and restored him to favour. De Vere was banished to Ireland, but at his master's desire omitted to leave the realm.

The contemptuous disregard for the will of parliament which the king displayed brought on him a worse fate than he deserved. His youngest uncle, Thomas of Woodstock, duke of Gloucester, was a designing and ambitious prince who saw his own advantage in embittering the strife between Richard and his parliament. John of Gaunt having departed to Spain, where he was stirring up civil strife in the name of his wife, the heiress of Peter the Cruel, Gloucester put him- self at the head of the opposition. Playing the part of the dema- gogue, and exaggerating all his nephew's petulant acts and sayings, he declared the constitution in danger, and took arms at the head of a party of peers, the earls of Warwick, Arundel and Nottingham, and Henry, earl of Derby, the son of John of Gaunt, who called themselves the lords appellant, because they were ready to " appeal " Richard's councillors of treason. Public opinion was against the king, and the small army which his confidant De Vere raised under the royal banner was easily scattered by Gloucester's forces at the rout of Radcot Bridge (Dec. 20, 1387). Oxford and Suffolk succeeded in escaping to France, but the king and the rest of his adherents fell into the hands of the lords appellant. They threatened for a moment to depose him, but finally placed him under the control of a council and ministers Execution chosen by themselves, and to put him in a proper of the state of terror, executed Lord See also:

Beauchamp, the judge, king's Sir Robert Tressilian. and six or seven more of his friends. chief friends. This was a piece of gratuitous cruelty, for the king, though wayward and unwise, had done nothing to justify such treatment. To the surprise of the nation Richard took his humiliation quietly. But he was merely biding his time; he had sworn Richard revenge in his heart, but he was ready to wait long for rules con- it. For the next nine years he appeared an unexcepstitution- tionable sovereign, anxious only to conciliate the allY' nation and parliament.

He got rid of the ministers imposed upon him by the lords appellant, but replaced them by Bishop Wykeham and other old statesmen against whom no objection could be raised. He disarmed Gloucester by making a close alliance with his elder uncle John of Gaunt, who had been absent in Spain during the troubles of 1387-1388, and was displeased at the violent doings of his brother. His rule was mild Peace with and moderate, and he succeeded at last in freeing France. himself from the See also:

incubus of the French war—the source of most of the evils of the time, for it was the heavy taxation required to feed this struggle which embittered509 all the domestic politics of the realm. After two long truces, which filled the years 1390-1395, a definitive peace was at last concluded, by which the English king kept Calais and the coast-strip of Guienne, from Bordeaux to Bayonne, which had never been lost to the enemy. To confirm the peace, he married Isabella, the young daughter of Charles VI. (Nov. 1396); he had lost his first wife, the excellent See also:Anne of Bohemia, two years before. The king seemed firmly seated on his throne—so much so that in 1395 he had found leisure for a long expedition to Ireland, which none of his ancestors had visited since King John. He compelled all the native princes to do him homage, and exercised the royal authority in such a firm manner as had never before been known in the island. But those who looked forward to quiet and prosperous times both for Ireland and for England were destined to be undeceived. In 1397 Richard carried out an extraordinary and unexpected coup d'etat, which he had evidently premeditated for many years. Having lived down his unpopularity, and made himself many powerful friends, he resolved to take his long-deferred revenge on Gloucester and the other lords appellant.

He trumped. up a vain story that his uncle was once more conspiring against him, arrested him, and sent him His over to Calais, where he was secretly murdered in revenge on prison. At the same time Gloucester's two chief Gloucester confederates of 1387, the earls of Arundel and Warwick, and the were tried and sentenced to death: the former was lords appef/See also:

ant. actually executed, the latter imprisoned for life. The other two lords appellant, Mowbray, duke of Norfolk,' and Henry of See also:Bolingbroke, the son of John of Gaunt, were dealt with a year later. Richard pretended to hold them among his best friends, but in 1398 induced Bolingbroke to accuse Banish- Norfolk of treasonable language. Mowbray denied it, meat of and challenged his accuser to a judicial See also:duel. When Boling-they were actually facing each other in the lists at broke and See also:Coventry, the king forbade them to fight, and an- Norfolk nounced that he banished them both—Henry for six years, Norfolk for life. having thus completed his vengeance on those who had slain his friends ten years before—their respective punishments were judiciously adapted to their several responsibilities in that matter—Richard began to behave in an arbitrary Arbitrary ra/e of and unconstitutional fashion. He evidently thought Richard. that no one would dare to lift a hand against him after the examples that he had just made. This might have been so, if he had continued to rule as cautiously as during the time when he was See also:nursing his scheme of revenge. But now his See also:brain seemed to be turned by success—indeed his wild language at times seemed to argue that he was not wholly sane. He declared that all pardons issued since 1387 were invalid, and imposed heavy fines on persons, and even on whole shires, that had given the lords appellant aid.

He made huge forced loans, and employed recklessly the abuse of See also:

purveyance. He browbeat the judges on the bench, and kept many persons under arrest for indefinite periods without a trial. But the act which provoked the nation most was that he terrified the parliament which met at Shrews-bury in 1398 into voting away its powers to a small committee of ten persons, all creatures of his own. This body he used as his instrument of government, treating its assent as See also:equivalent to that of a whole parliament in session. There seemed to be an end to the constitutional liberties of England. Such violence, however, speedily brought its own punishment. In 1399 Richard sailed over to Ireland to put down a revolt of the native princes, who had defeated and slain the earl of March, his cousin and their lord-lieutenant. Seaoad expedition While he was absent Henry of Bolingbroke landed tolreland. at Ravenspur with a small body of exiles and mer- cenaries. He pretended that he had merely come to claim the estates and title of his father John of Gaunt, who had died a few months before. The adventurer was at once joined by the i The Nottingham of 1387, who had been promoted to the higher title. See also:Impeachment of the king's " favourites." The " lords appellant." Richard reduces Ireland to obedience.

earl of Northumberland and all the lords of the north; the army which was called out against him refused to fight, and joined Henry of his banner, and in a few days he was master of all Boling- England (July 1399). King Richard, hurrying back broke from Ireland, landed at See also:

Milford Haven just in time lands in to learn that the levies raised in his name had dis-Bngland. persed or joined the enemy. He still had with him a considerable force, and might have tried the fortune of war with some prospect of success. But his conduct seemed dictated by absolute infatuation; he might have fought, or he might have fled to his father-in-law in France, if he judged his troops untrustworthy. Instead of taking either course, he deserted his army by night, and fled into the Welsh mountains, apparently with the intention of collecting fresh adherents from North Wales and See also:Cheshire, the only regions where he was popular. But Bolingbroke had already seized Chester, and was marching against him at the head of such a large army that the countryside refused to stir. After skulking for three weeks in the hills, Richard surrendered to his cousin at See also:Flint, on the l9th of August 1399, having previously stipulated that if he consented to abdicate his life should be spared, surrender his adherents pardoned, and an honourable livelihood and abdi- assured to him. This surrender put the crown to his cation of career of folly. He should have known that Henry Richard. would never feel safe while he survived, and that no oaths could be trusted in such circumstances. At all costs he should have endeavoured to escape abroad, a course that was still in his power. Richard carried out his part of the bargain; he executed a See also:deed of See also:abdication in which he owned himself " insufficient and use- less." It was read to a parliament summoned in his acres- name on the 3oth of September, and the throne was skin of Henry Iv. declared vacant. There was small doubt as to the personality of his successor; possession is nine points of the law, and Henry of Bolingbroke for the moment had the whole nation at his back.

His hereditary title indeed was imperfect; though he was the eldest descendant of Edward III. in the male line after Richard, yet there was a whole family which stood between him and the crown. From Lionel of Clarence, the second son of Edward HI. (John of Gaunt was only the third) descended the house of March, and the late king had proclaimed that Edmund of March would be his heir if he should die childless. Fortunately for Bolingbroke the young earl was only six years of age; not a See also:

voice was raised in his favour in parliament. When Henry stood forward and claimed the vacant throne by right of conquest and also by right of descent, no one gainsaid him. Lords and commons voted that they would have him for their king, and he was duly crowned on the 13th of October 1399. No faith was kept with the unhappy Richard; he was placed in close and secret confinement, and denied the ordinary comforts of life. Moreover the adherents for whose safety he had stipulated were at once impeached of treason. Henry of Lancaster came to the throne, for all intents and purposes as an elective king; he had to depend for the future on his ability to conciliate and satisfy the baronage nosiri°° of and the commons by his governance. For by his the new king. usurpation he had sanctioned the theory that kings can be deposed for incapacity and maladministration. If he himself should become unpopular, all the arguments that he had employed against Richard might be turned against him-self. The prospect was not reassuring; his revenue was small, and parliament would certainly murmur if he tried to increase it.

The late king was not without partisans and admirers. There was a considerable chance that the French king might declare war—nominally to avenge his son-in-law, really to win Calais and Bordeaux. Of the partisans who had placed Henry on the throne many were greedy, and some were wholly unreasonable. But he trusted to his tact and his energy, and cheerfully undertook the task of ruling as a constitutional king —the friend of the parliament that had placed him on the throne. The problem proved more weary and exhausting than he had suspected. From the very first his reign was a time of war, foreign and domestic, of murmuring, and of humiliating shifts and devices. Henry commenced his career by ofbheikon granting the adherents of Richard II. their lives, after earls. they had been first declared guilty of treason and had been deprived of the titles, lands and endowments given them by the late king. Their reply to this very modified show of mercy was to engage in a desperate conspiracy against him. If they had waited till his popularity had waned, they might have had some chance of success, but in anger and resentment they struck too soon. The earls of Kent and Huntingdon, close kinsmen of Richard on his mother's side, the earl of Salisbury--a noted Lollard—and the lords Despenser and Lumley took arms at midwinter (Jan. 4, 1400) and attempted to seize the king at Windsor. They captured the castle, but Henry escaped, raised the levies of London against them, and beat them into the west.

Kent and Salisbury were slain at See also:

Cirencester, the others captured and executed with many of their followers. Their rebellion sealed the fate of the master in whose cause they had risen. Henry and his counsellors were determined that there should be no further use made of the name of the "lawful king," and Richard was deliberately murdered by m hard~f privation—insufficient clothing, See also:food and warmth—in his See also:dungeon at See also:Pontefract Castle (Feb. 17, 1400). It is impossible not to pity his fate. He had been wayward, unwise and occasionally revengeful; but his provocation had been great, and if few tyrants have used more violent and offensive language, few have committed such a small list of actual crimes. It was a curious commentary on Henry's policy, that Richard, even when dead, did not cease to give him trouble. Rumour got abroad, owing to the secrecy of his end, that he was not really dead, and an impostor long lived at the Scottish court who claimed to be the missing king, and was recognized as Richard by many malcontents who wished to be deceived. The rising of the earls was only the first and the least dangerous of the trials of Henry IV. Only a few months after their death a rebellion of a far more formidable sort broke welsh Hs-out in Wales—where Richard II. had been popular, ing under and the house of March, his natural heirs, held large Owen estates. The leader was a gentleman named Owen Oien-Glendower, who had the blood of the ancient kings of See also:dower Gwynedd in his See also:veins. Originally he had taken to the hills as a mere outlaw, in consequence of a quarrel with one of the marcher barons; but after many small successes he began to be recognized as a national leader by his countrymen, and pro-claimed himself prince of Wales.

The king marched against him in person in 1400 and 1401, but Glendower showed himself a master of See also:

guerrilla warfare; he refused battle, and defied pursuit in his mountains, till the stores of the English army were exhausted and Henry was forced to retire. His prestige as a general was shaken, and his treasury exhausted by these fruitless irregular campaigns. Meanwhile worse troubles were to come. The commons were beginning to murmur at the king's administration; they had obtained neither the peace nor the diminished taxation which they had been promised. Moreover, among of t Dische ontent some classes at least, he had won desperate hatred commons. by his policy in matters of See also:religion. One of his chief supporters in 1399 had been Archbishop Arundel, an old enemy of Richard II. and brother to the earl who had been beheaded in 1399. Arundel was determined to extirpate the Lollards, and used his influence on the king to induce him to frame and pass through parliament the detestable statute De statute". heretico comburendo, which recognized death by burn- heretico ing at the stake as the penalty of heresy, and bound See also:coin-the civil authorities to arrest, hand over to the church burendo. courts, and receive back for execution, all contumacious Lollards. Henry himself does not seem to have been particularly enthusiastic for persecution, but in order to keep the church party on his side he was forced to sanction it. The burnings began with that of William Sawtre, a London See also:vicar, on the 2nd of Flight of Richard. March 14o1; they continued intermittently throughout the reign. The victims were nearly all clergy or citizens; the king shrank from touching the Lollards of higher rank, and even employed in his service some who were notoriously tainted with heresy. External troubles continued to multiply during Henry's earlier years.

The Scots had declared war, and there was every sign that the French would soon follow suit, for the king's failure to crush Glendower had destroyed his reputation for capacity. The rebel achieved his greatest success in June 1402, when he surprised and routed the whole levy of the marcher lords at Bryn G'See also:

las, between Pilleth and Knighton, capturing (among many other prisoners) Sir Edmund Mortimer, the uncle and guardian of the young earl of March, whom all malcontents regarded as the rightful monarch of England. A few months after the king's fortune seemed to take a turn for the better, when the Scots were defeated at Homildon Hill by the earl of Northumberland and See also:cattle of his son Henry Percy, the celebrated " Hotspur." But Homildon See also:HII/ this victory was to be the prelude to new dangers: half the nobility of Scotland had been captured in the battle, and Northumberland intended to fill his coffers with their ransoms; but the king looked upon them as state prisoners and announced his intention of taking them out of the earl's hands. Northumberland was a greedy and unscrupulous Border chief, who regarded himself as entitled to exact whatever he chose from his master, because he had been the first to join him at his landing in 1399, and had lent him a consistent support ever since. He had been amply rewarded by grants of land and money, but was not yet satisfied. In indignation at the first refusal that he had met, the earl conspired with Glendower to raise rebellion in the name of the rightful heirs of King Richard, the house of March. The third party in the plot was Sir Edmund Mortimer, Glendower's captive, who was easily persuaded to join a movement for the aggrandizement of his own family. He married Owen's daughter, and became his trusted lieutenant. Northumberland also enlisted the services of his chief Scottish prisoner, the earl of See also:Douglas, who promised him aid from beyond Tweed. In July 1403 came the crisis of King Henry's reign; while Glendower burst into South Wales, and overran the whole Insurrec- countryside as far as Cardiff and Carmarthen, the tion in the Percies raised their banner in the North. The old earl north and set himself to subdue Yorkshire; his son Hotspur west. and the earl of Douglas marched south and opened communication with the Welsh. All Cheshire, a district always faithful to the name of Richard II., rose in their favour, and they were joined by Hotspur's uncle, the earl of Worcester.

They then advanced towards Shrewsbury, where they hoped that Glendower might meet them. But long ere the Welsh could appear, King Henry was on the spot; he brought the rebels Defeat of to action at Hately Field, just outside the gates of the rebels Shrewsbury, and inflicted on them a complete defeat, at shrews- in which his young son Henry of See also:

Monmouth first bury. won his reputation as a fighting man. Hotspur was slain, Worcester taken and beheaded, Douglas desperately wounded (July 23, 1403). On receiving this disastrous news the earl of Northumberland sued for pardon; the king was unwise enough to grant it, merely punishing him by fining him and taking all his castles out of his hands. By winning the battle of Shrewsbury Henry IV. had saved his crown, but his troubles were yet far from an end. The long- expected breach with France had at last come to War with pass; the duke of Orleans, without any declaration of France renewed. war, had entered Guienne, while a French fleet attacked the south-west of England, and- burnt See also:Plymouth. Even more menacing to the king's prosperity was the news that another squadron had appeared off the coast of Wales, and landed stores and succours for Glendower, who had now conquered the whole principality save a few isolated fortresses. The drain of money to meet this combination of foreign war and domestic rebellion was more than the king's exchequer could meet. He was driven into unconstitutional ways of raising money, which recalled all the misdoings of his predecessor. Hence came a series of rancorous quarrels with his parliaments, which grew more disloyal and clamorous Parlia- at every new session. The cry was raised that the See also:moot taxes were heavy not because of the French or Welsh assumes wars, but because Henry lavished his money on controlol favourites and unworthy dependents. He was forced finances.

to bow before the storm, though the charge had small See also:

foundation: the greater part of his household was dismissed, and the war-taxes were paid not to his treasurer but to a financial committee appointed by parliament. It was not till 1405 that the worst of Henry's troubles came to an end. This year saw the last of the See also:convulsions that threatened to overturn him,—a rising in the North headed by the old earl of Northumberland, by Richard 1Rising of See also:Scrope, archbishop of York, and by Thomas Mowbray the North. the earl marshal. It might have proved even more dangerous than the rebellion of 1403, if Henry's unscrupulous general Ralph, earl of See also:Westmorland, had not lured Scrope and Mowbray to a conference, and then arrested them under circumstances of the vilest treachery. He handed them over to the king, who beheaded them both outside the See also:gate of York, without any proper trial before their peers. Northumberland thereupon fled to Scotland without further fighting. He remained in exile till January 1408, when he made a final attempt to raise rebellion in the North, and was defeated and slain at the battle of Bramham See also:Moor. Long before this last-named fight Henry's fortunes had begun to mend. Glendower was at last checked by the untiring energy of the king's eldest son, Henry of Monmouth, who Suppreshad been given charge of the Welsh war. Even when sign of the French aid was sent him, the rebel chief proved unable welsh to maintain his grip on South Wales. He was beaten rising. out of it in 1406, and See also:Aberystwyth Castle, where his garrison made a desperate defence for two years, became the southern limit of his dominions. In the end of 1408 Prince Henry captured this place, and six weeks later See also:Harlech, the greatest stronghold of the rebels, where Sir Edmund Mortimer, Owen's son-in-law and most trusted captain, held out till he died of See also:starvation.

From this time onwards the Welsh rebellion gradually died down, till Owen relapsed into the position from which he had started, that of a guerrilla chief maintaining a predatory warfare in the mountains. From 1409 onward he ceased to be a public danger to the realm, yet so great was his cunning and activity that he was never caught, and died still maintaining a hopeless rebellion so late as 1416. The French war died down about the same time that the Welsh rebellion became insignificant. Louis of Orleans, the head of the French war party, was murdered by his cousin End of the John, duke of Burgundy, in November 1407, and after French his death the French turned from the struggle with and scot-England to indulge in furious civil wars. Calais, tish wars. Bordeaux and Bayonne still remained safe under the English banner. The Scottish war had ended even earlier. Prince See also:

James, the heir of Robert III., had been captured at sea in 1406. The duke of See also:Albany, who became regent when Robert died, had no wish to see his nephew return, and concluded a corrupt agreement with the king of England, by which he undertook to keep Scotland out of the strife, if Henry would prevent the rightful heir from returning to claim his own.' Hence Albany and his son ruled at Edinburgh for seventeen years, while James was detained in an honourable captivity at Windsor. From 1408 till his death in 1413 Henry was freed from all the dangers which had beset his earlier years. But he got small enjoyment from the crown which no longer tottered Illness of on his brow. Soon after his execution of Archbishop the king.

Scrope he had been smitten with a painful disorder, Faction In which his enemies declared to be the punishment the court. I Mr See also:

Andrew See also:Lang takes a different view of the character of Albany and his attitude in this matter. See Hist. of Scotland, i. 289, and the See also:article SCOTLAND: History,—ED. War with Scotland. Conspiracy of Northumberland with Glen-dower. him to abdicate, and resented the idea. It seems that a plot with such an object was actually on foot, and that the younger Henry gave it up in a moment of better feeling, when he realized the evil impression that the unfilial act would make upon the nation. At this time the prince gave small promise of developing into the model monarch that he afterwards became. There was no doubt of his military ability, which had been fully demonstrated in the long Welsh wars, but he is reputed to have shown himself arrogant, contentious and over-given to loose-living. There were many, Archbishop Arundel among them, who looked forward with See also:apprehension to his accession to the throne. The two parties in the council of Henry IV. were agreed that it would be profitable to intervene in the wars of France, but they differed as to the side which offered the most English advantages.

Hence came action which seemed in-expedition to France. . consistent, if not immoral; in 1411, under the prince's to F influence, an English contingent joined the Burgundians and helped them to raise the siege of Paris. In 1412, by Arundel's advice, a second army under the duke of Clarence crossed the Channel to co-operate with the See also:

Orleanists. But the French factions, wise for once, made peace at the time of Clarence's expedition, and paid him 210,000 gold crowns to leave the country! The only result of the two expeditions was to give the English soldiery a poor opinion of French military capacity, and a notion that money was easily to be got from the distracted realm beyond the narrow seas. On the loth of March 1413, King Henry's long illness at last reached a fatal issue, and his eldest son ascended the throne. The new king had everything in his favour; his father Accession had borne the odium of usurpation and fought down Henry V. the forces of anarchy. The memory of Richard II. had been forgotten; the young earl of March had grown up into the most harmless and unenterprising of men, and the nation seemed satisfied with the new dynasty, whose first sovereign had shown himself, under much provocation, the most moderate and accommodating of constitutional monarchs. Henry V. on his accession bade farewell to the faults of his youth. He seems to have felt a genuine regret for the unfilial conduct which had vexed his father's last years, and showed a careful determination to turn over a new See also:leaf and give his enemies no scope for criticism. From the first he showed a sober and grave bearing; he reconciled himself to all his enemies, gave up his youthful follies, and became a model king according to the ideas of his day.

There is no doubt character. Nis that he had a strong sense of moral responsibility, and that he was sincerely pious. But his piety inspired him to redouble the persecution of the unfortunate Lollards, whom his father had harried only in an intermittent fashion; and his sense of moral responsibility did not prevent him from taking the utmost advantage of the civil wars of his unhappy neighbours of France. The first notable event of Henry's reign was his assault upon the Lollards. His father had spared their lay chiefs, and con-tented himself with burning preachers or tradesmen. Henry arrested John See also:

Oldcastle, Lord See also:Cobham, their Persecu- leading politician, and had him tried and condemned Lion or the LoOards. to the stake. But Oldcastle escaped from the Tower before the day fixed for his execution, and framed a wild plot for slaying or deposing his persecutor. He planned to gather the Lollards of London and the Home Counties under arms, and to seize the person of the king—a scheme as wild as the See also:design of Guy See also:Fawkes or the Fifth Monarchy Men in later generations, for the sectaries were not strong enough to coerce the whole nation. Henry received early notice of the plot, and nipped it in the bud, scattering Oldcastle's levies in St Giles' See also:Fields (Jan. 10, 1414) and hanging most of his lieutenants. But their reckless leader escaped, and for three years led the life of an outlaw, till in 1417 he was finally captured, still in arms, and sent to the stake.

This danger having passed, Henry set himself to take advantage of the troubles of France. He threatened to invade that realm unless the Orleans faction, who had for the moment possession of the person of the mad king Charles VI., should restore to him all that Edward III. had owned in 136o, with Anjou and Normandy in addition. The demand was absurd and exorbitant and was refused, though the French government offered him the hand of their king's daughter See also:

Catherine with a dowry of 800,000 crowns and the districts of Quercy and Perigord—sufficiently handsome terms. When he began to collect a fleet and an army, they added to the offer the Limousin and other regions; but Henry was determined to pick his quarrel, and declared war in an impudent and hypocritical manifesto, in which he declared that he was driven into strife against his will. The fact was that he had secured the promise of the neutrality or the co-operation of the Burgundian faction, and thought that he could crush the Orleanists with ease. He sailed for France in August 1415, with an army compact and well-equipped, but not very numerous. On the eve of his departure he detected and quelled a plot as wild and futile as that of Oldcastle. The conspirators were his cousin, Richard, earl of See also:Cambridge, Lord Scrope, and Sir Thomas See also:Grey, a kinsman of the Percies. They had planned to raise a rebellion in the name of the earl of March, in whose cause Wales and the North were to have been called to arms. But March himself refused to stir, and betrayed them to the king, who promptly beheaded them, and set sail five days later. He landed near the mouth of the Seine, and commenced his campaign by besieging and capturing Harfleur, which the Orleanists made no attempt to succour. But such a large number of his troops perished in the trenches by a pestilential disorder, that he found himself too weak to march on Paris, and took his way to Calais across Picardy, hoping, as it seems, to lure the French to battle by exposing his small army to attack.

The plan was hazardous, for the Orleanists turned out in great numbers and almost cut him off in the marshes of the Somme. When he had struggled across them, and was half-way to Calais, the enemy beset him in the fields of See also:

Agincourt (Oct. 25, Battle of 1415). Here Henry vindicated his military reputation Agincourt. by winning a victory even more surprising than those of Crecy, and Poitiers, for he was outnumbered in an even greater proportion than the two See also:Edwards had been in 1346 and 1356, inflicted on him by See also:heaven for the prelate's death. It grew gradually worse, and developed into what his contemporaries called leprosy—a loathsome skin disease accompanied by bouts of See also:fever, which sometimes kept him bedridden for months at a time. From 1409 onwards he became a mere invalid, only able to assert himself in rare intervals of convalescence. The domestic politics of the realm during his last five years were nothing more than a struggle between two court factions who desired to use his name. The one was headed by his son Henry, prince of Wales, and his half-brothers John, Henry and Thomas Beau-fort, the base-born but legitimized children of John of Gaunt. The other was under the direction of Archbishop Arundel, the king's earliest ally, who had already twice served him as chancellor, and had the whole church party at his back. Arundel was backed by Thomas duke of Clarence, the king's second son, who was an enemy of the Beauforts, and not on the best terms with his own elder brother, the prince of Wales. The fluctuating influence of each party with the king was marked by the passing of the chancellorship from Arundel to Henry See also:Beaufort and back again during the five years of Henry's illness. The rivalry between them was purely personal; both were prepared to go on with the " Lancastrian experiment," the atteliipt to govern the realm in a constitutional fashion by an alliance between the king and the parliament; both were eager persecutors of the Lollards; both were eager to make profit for England by interfering in the civil wars of the Orleanists and Burgundians which were now devastating France.

The prince of Wales, it is clear, gave much umbrage to his father by his eagerness to direct the policy of the crown ere.yet it had fallen to him by inheritance. The king See also:

sus- Prince pected, and with good reason, that his son wished See also:Hal. Rising under Oldcastle. Henry V. and France. Henry invades France. 1415–1422] and had to take the offensive instead of being attacked in a strong position. The heavily armoured French noblesse, embogged in miry meadows, proved helpless before the lightly equipped English archery. The slaughter in their ranks was terrible, and the young duke of Orleans, the head of the predominant faction of the moment, was taken prisoner with many great nobles. How-ever, so exhausted was the victorious army that Henry merely led it back to Calais, without attempting anything more in this year. The sole tangible asset of the campaign was the possession of Harfleur, the gate of Normandy, a second Calais in its advantages when future invasions were taken in hand. The moral effects were more important. The Orleanist party was shaken in its power; the rival Burgundian faction became more inclined to commit itself to the English cause, and the terror of the English arms weighed heavily upon both.

It was not till the next year but one that Henry renewed his invasion of France—the intervening space was spent in ne England gotiations with Burgundy, and with the emperor and the See also:

Sigismund, whose aid the king secured in return for council of help in putting an end to the scandalous " great constance. schism " which had been rending the Western Church for so many years. The English deputation lent their aid to Sigismund at the council of Constance, when Christendom was at last reunited under a single head, though all the reforms which were to have accompanied the See also:reunion were postponed, and ultimately avoided altogether, by the restored papacy. In July 1417 Henry began his second invasion of France, and landed at the mouth of the Seine with a powerful army of 17,000 Henry's men. He had resolved to adopt a plan of campaign second very different from those which Edward III. or the invasion Black Prince had been wont to pursue, having in view of France. nothing more than the steady and gradual conquest of the province of Normandy. This he was able to accomplish without any interference from the government at Paris, for the constable Armagnac, who had succeeded the captive Orleans at the head of the anti-Burgundian party, had no troops to spare. He was engaged in a separate campaign with Henry's ally John the Fearless, and left Normandy to shift for itself. One after another all the towns of the duchy were reduced, save Rouen, the siege of which, as the hardest task, King Henry postponed till the rest of the country-side was in his hands. He sat down to besiege it in 1418, and was detained before its walls for many months, for the citizens made an admirable defence. Meanwhile a change had taken place in the domestic politics of France; the Burgundians seized Paris in May 1418; the constable Armagnac and many of his Triumph partisans were massacred, and John the Fearless got of the possession of the person of the mad Charles VI., See also:Bur- and became the responsible ruler of France. He had gundlans. then to choose between buying off his English allies by great concessions, or taking up the position of champion of French interests. He selected the latter role, broke with Henry, and tried to relieve Rouen. But all his efforts were foiled, and the Norman capital surrendered, completely starved out,on Henry the 19th of January 1419.

On this Burgundy resolved takes Rouen. to open negotiations with Henry; he wished to free R his hands for an attack on his domestic enemies, who had rallied beyond the Loire under the leadership of the dauphin Charles—from whom the party, previously known first as Or- leanists and then as Armagnacs, gets for the future the name of the " Dauphinois." The English king, however, seeing the manifest advantage of his position, tried to drive too hard a bargain; he demanded the old boundaries of 136o, with his new conquest of Normandy, the hand of the princess Catherine, and a great sum of ready money. Burgundy dared not concede so much, under See also:

pain of alienating all his more patriotic Murder of supporters. He broke off the conference of Meulan, John of Burgundy. and tried to patch up a peace with the dauphin, in order to unite all Frenchmen against the foreign in- vader. This laudable intention was wrecked by the treachery of the young heir to the French throne; on the bridge of IX. 17513 See also:Montereau Charles deliberately murdered the suppliant duke, as he knelt to do homage, thinking thereby that he would make an end of the Burgundian party (Sept. 9, 1419). This abominable deed gave northern France for twenty years to an English master. The young duke of Burgundy, Philip the Good, and his supporters in Paris and the north, were so incensed with the dauphin's cruel treachery that they resolved that he should never inherit his father's crown. They proffered peace to King Henry, and offered to recognize his preposterous' claim to the French throne, on condition that he should marry the princess Catherine and See also:guarantee the constitutional liberties of the realm. The insane Charles VI. should keep nominal possession of the royal title till his death, but meanwhile the Burgundians would do homage to Henry as " heir of France. " These terms were welcomed by the English king, Treaty of and ratified at the treaty of See also:Troyes (May 21, 1420). Troyes.

Henry married the princess Catherine, received the oaths of Duke Philip and his partisans, and started forth to conquer the Dauphinois at the head of an army of which half was composed of Burgundian levies. Paris, Picardy, Champagne, and indeed the greater part of France north of the Loire, acknowledged him as their sovereign. Henry had only two years longer to live; they were spent in incessant and successful campaigning against the partisans of his brother-in-law, the dauphin Charles; by a long series of sieges the partisans of that worthless prinee HDeeathn of ry V. were evicted from all their northern strongholds. They fought long and bitterly, nor was this to be marvelled at, for Henry had a custom of executing as traitors all who with-stood him, and those who had once defied him did well to fight to the last gasp, in order to avoid the See also:

block or the halter. In the longest and most desperate of these sieges, that of See also:Meaux (Oct. 142r–March 1422), the king contracted a dysenteric ailment which he could never shake off. He survived for a few months, but died, worn out by his incessant campaigning, on the 31st of August 1422, leaving the crown of England and the heirship of France to his only child Henry of Windsor, an infant less than two years old. Few sovereigns in history have accomplished such a disastrous life's work as this much-admired prince. If he had not been a soldier of the first ability and a diplomatist of the most unscrupulous sort, he could never have advanced so far towards his ill-chosen See also:goal, the conquest of France. His genius and the dauphin's murderous act of folly at Montereau conspired to make the incredible almost possible. Indeed, if Henry had lived five years longer, he would probably have carried his arms to the Mediterranean, and have united France and England in uneasy union for some short space of time.

It is clear that they could not have been held together after his death, for none but a king of exceptional powers could have resisted their natural impulse to break apart. As it was, Henry had accomplished just enough to tempt his countrymen to persevere for nearly thirty years in the endeavour to complete the task he had begun. France was ruined for a generation, England was exhausted by her effort, and (what was worse) her governing classes learnt in the long and pitiless war lessons of demoralization which were to bear fruit in the ensuing struggle of the two See also:

Roses. It is a strange fact that Henry, though he was in many respects a conscientious man, with a strong sense of responsibility, and a sincere piety, was so blind to the unrighteousness of his own actions that he died asserting that " neither ambition nor vainglory had led him into France, but a genuine desire to assert a righteous claim, which he desired his heirs to prosecute to the bitter end." The guardianship of the infant Henry VI. fell to his two uncles, John of Bedford and Humphrey of Gloucester, the two a The See also:peculiar absurdity of Henry's claim to be king of France was that if, on the original English claim as set forth by Edward III., heirship through See also:females counted, then the earl of March was entitled to the French throne. A See also:vote of the English parliament superseding March's claim in favour of that of IIemv IV. could obViously have no legal effect in France. 11 Effect of the baffle. Conquest of Normandy. The Burgundians acknowledge Henry as heir of France. Effects of his con-quests. surviving brothers of the late king. Bedford became regent in France, and took over the heritage of the war, in which he Henry VI. was vigorously aided by the young Philip of Bur- gundy, whose sister he soon after married. Almost his first duty was to bury the insane Charles VI., who only survived his son-in-law for a few months, and to proclaim his little nephew king of France under the name of Henry II.

GIoucester, however, had personal charge of the child, who was to be reared in England; he had also hoped to become See also:

protector of the realm, and to use the position for his own private interests, for he was a selfish and ambitious prince. But the council refused to let him assume the full powers of a regent, and bound him with many checks and restrictions, because they were well aware of his character. The tiresome and monotonous domestic history of England during the next twenty years consisted of little else than quarrels between Gloucester and the lords of the council, of whom the chief was the duke's half-uncle Henry Beaufort, bishop of Winchester, the last to survive of all the sons of John of Gaunt. The duke and the bishop were both unscrupulous; but the churchman, with all his faults, was a patriotic statesman, while Gloucester cared far more for his own private ends than for the welfare of the realm. While these two well-matched antagonists were wrangling in England, Bedford, a capable general and a wise administrator, was doing his best to carry out the task which the dying Henry V. had laid upon him, by crushing the dauphin, or Charles VII. as he now called himself since his father's death. As long as the Burgundian party lent the regent their aid, the limits of the land still unsubdued continued to shrink, though the process was slow. Two con- siderable victories, Cravant (1423) and See also:Verneuil (1424), marked the early years of Bedford's campaigning; at each, it may be noted, a very large proportion of his army was composed of Burgundian auxiliaries. But after a time their assistance began to be given less freely; this was due to the selfish intrigues of Humphrey of Gloucester, who, regardless of the general Humphrey policy of England, had quarrelled with Philip the of Olou- See also:tester. Good. He had married See also:Jacoba (Jacquelaine), countess of See also:Hainaut and See also:Holland, a cousin of the Burgundian duke, who coveted and hoped to secure her lands. Pressing her claims, Gloucester came to open blows with Philip in Flanders and Hainaut (1424). In his anger the Burgundian ceased to support Bedford, and would have joined Charles VII. if revenge on the murderers of his father had not still remained his dominant passion.

But Gloucester's attempt to seize Hainaut failed, and Philip, when he had got possession of his cousin's person and estates, allowed himself to be pacified by Bedford, who could prove that he had no part in his brother's late intrigues. This quarrel having been appeased, the advance against the territories of Charles VII. was resumed. It went slowly on, till in 1428 the tide of war reached the walls of Orleans, now the only place north of the Loire which remained unsubdued. The siege was long; but after the last army which the Dauphinois could raise had been beaten at the battle of Rouvray (Feb. 1429) it seemed that the end was near. Charles VII. was in such a state of despair after this last check, that he was actually taking into consideration a flight to Italy or Spain, and the See also:

abandonment of the struggle. He had shown himself so incapable and apathetic that his followers were sick of fighting for such a despicable master. From this depth of despair the party which, with all its faults, represented the national sentiment of France was rescued by Joan of the astonishing exploits of Joan of Arc. Charles and Ara his counsellors had no great confidence in the mission of this prophetess and champion, when she presented herself to them, promising to relieve Orleans and turn back the English. But all expedients are See also:worth trying in the hour of ruin, and seeing that Joan was disinterested and sincere, and that her preaching exercised a marked influence over the people and the soldiery, Charles allowed her to march with the last levies that he put into the field for the relief of Orleans. From 1',at moment, the fortune of war turned; the presence of theprophetess with the French troops had an immediate and in-calculable effect. Under the belief that they were now led by a messenger from heaven, the Dauphinois fought with a fiery courage that they had never before displayed.

Their movements were skilfully directed—whether by Joan's generalship or that of her captains it boots not to inquire—and after the first successes which she achieved, in entering Orleans and capturing some of the besiegers' forts around it, the English became panic-stricken. They were cowed, as they said, " by that disciple and See also:

limb of the fiend called La Pucelle, that used false enchantments and sorcery." Suffolk, their See also:commander, raised the siege, and sent to Bedford for reinforcements; but as he retreated he was set upon by the victorious army, and captured with most of his men at Jargeau and See also:Beaugency (June 1429). The succours which were coming to his aid from Paris were defeated by the Maid at Patay a few days later, and for the most part destroyed. The regent Bedford was now in a desperate position. His field army had been destroyed, and on all sides the provinces which had long lain inert beneath the English yoke were See also:corona. beginning to stir. When Joan led forth the French See also:don of king to crown him at Reims, all the towns of Cham- Charles pagne opened their gates to her one after another. vll. at A large reinforcement received from England only just Reims. enabled Bedford to save Paris and some of the fortresses of the Ile de France. The rest revolted at the sight of the Maid's See also:white banner. If Joan had been well supported by her master and his counsellors, it is probable that she might have completed her mission by expelling the English from France. But, despite all that she had done, Charles VII. and his favourites had a profound disbelief in her inspiration, and generally thwarted her plans. After an ill-concerted attack on Paris, in which Joan was wounded, the French army broke up for the winter. They had shaken the grip of the English on the north, and reconquered a vast stretch of territory, but they had failed by their own fault to achieve complete success. Nevertheless the See also:crucial point of the war had passed; after 1429 the Burgundian party began to slacken in its support of the English cause, and to pass over piecemeal to the national side.

This was but natural: the partisans who could remember nothing but the foul deed of Montereau were yearly growing fewer, and it was clear that Charles VII., personally despicable though he might be, represented the cause of French nationality. The natural See also:

drift of circumstances was not stayed even by the disastrous end of the career of Joan of Arc in 1430. The king's ministers had refused to take her counsels or to entrust Capture her with another army, but she went forth with a small and force of See also:volunteers to relieve the important fortress of ofexecutianon Jo See also:Compiegne. The place was saved, but in a sortie she was captured by the Burgundians, who sold her for 1o,o00 francs to Bedford. The regent handed her over for punishment as a sorceress to the French clergy of his own party. After a long trial, carried out with elaborate formality and great unfairness, the unhappy Joan was found guilty of proclaiming as divine visions what were delusions of the evil one, or of her own vain See also:imagination, and when she persisted in maintaining their reality she was declared a relapsed heretic, and burnt at Rouen on the 3oth of May 1431. Charles VII. took little interest in her fate, which he might easily have prevented by threatening to retaliate on the numerous English prisoners who were in his power. Seldom had a good cause such an unworthy figurehead as that callous and apathetic prince. The movement which Joan had set on foot was in no way crushed by her execution. For the next four years the limits of the English occupation continued to recede. It was to no profit that Bedford brought over the young Henry VI. and had him crowned at Paris, in order to appeal to the loyalty of his French partisans by means of the king's forlorn youth and simplicity. Yet by endless feats of skilful generalship the regent continued to maintain a hold on Paris and on Normandy.

The fatal blow was administered by Philip of Burgundy, who, tired of maintaining a failing cause, consented at last to forget his father's murder. Bedford's rule in France. Siege of Orleans. Philip of Burgundy Joins Charles. Treaty of See also:

Arras. and to be reconciled to Charles VII. Their alliance was celebrated by the treaty of Arras (Sept. 6, 1435), at which the English were offered peace and the retention of Normandy and Guienne if they would evacuate Paris and the rest of France. They would have been wise to accept the agreement; but with obstinate and misplaced courage they refused to acknowledge Charles as king of France, or to give up to him the capital. Bedford, worn out by long campaigning, died at Rouen on the 14th of September 1435, just before the results of the treaty Death of of Arras began to make themselves felt. With him Bedford. died the best hope of the English party in France, English for he had been well loved by the Burgundians, and defeats. many had adhered to the cause of Henry VI. solely because of their personal See also:attachment to him. No worthy successor could be found—England had many hard-handed soldiers but no more statesmen of Bedford's calibre.

It was no wonder that Paris was lost within six months of the regent's death, Normandy invaded, and Calais beleaguered by an army headed by England's new enemy, Philip of Burgundy.. But the council, still backed by the nation, refused to give up the game; Burgundy was beaten off from Calais, and the young duke of York, the heir of the Mortimers, took the command at Rouen, and recovered much of what had been lost on the Norman side. The next eight years of the war were in some respects the most astonishing period of its interminable length. The English fought out the losing game with a wonderful obstinacy. Truce with Though every town that they held was eager to revolt, France. and though they were hopelessly outnumbered in every quarter, they kept a tight grip on the greater part of Normandy, and on their old domain in the Bordelais and about Bayonne. They lost nearly all their outlying possessions, but still made head against the generals of Charles VII: in these two regions. The leaders of this period of the war were the duke of York, and the aged Lord See also:

Talbot, afterwards earl of Shrews-bury. The struggle only ceased in 1444, when the English council, in which a peace party had at last been formed, concluded a two-year truce with King Charles, which they hoped to turn into a permanent treaty, on the condition that their king should retain what he held in Normandy and Guienne, but sign away his claim to the French crown, and relinquish the few places outside the two duchies which were still in his power—terms very similar to those rejected at Arras nine years before—but there was now much less to give up. To mark the reconciliation of the two powers Henry VI. was betrothed to the French king's niece, Margaret of Anjou. The two years' truce was repeatedly prorogued, and lasted till 1449, but no definitive treaty was ever concluded, owing to the bad faith with which both parties kept their promises. The government in England was now in the hands of the faction which Bishop Beaufort had originally led, for after long suprem- struggles the churchman had at last crushed his nephew acyofthe Humphrey.

In 1441 the duchess of Gloucester had Beauforts been arrested and charged with practising sorcery in against the health of the young king—apparently not England. without justification. She was tried and condemned to imprisonment for life; her See also:

guilt was visited on her husband, on whose behalf she was acting, for if Henry had died his uncle would have come to the throne. For some years he was con-strained to take a minor part in politics, only emerging occasion-ally to make violent and unwise protests against peace with France. The bishop now ruled, with his nephew Edmund Beaufort, duke of Somerset, and William de la Pole, earl of Suffolk, as his chief instruments. As he grew older he let the power slip into their hands, as it was they who were mainly responsible for the truce of 1444. King Henry, though he had reached the age of 23 at the time of his marriage, counted for nothing. He was a pious young man, simple to the Cbaracter verge of imbecility; a little later he developed actual of Henry See also:insanity, the heritage of his grandfather Charles VI. Vl. He showed a blind confidence in Suffolk and Somerset, who were wholly unworthy of it, for both were tricky and unscrupulous politicians. His wife Margaret of Anjou, though shepossessed all the See also:fire and energy which her husband lacked, was equally devoted to these two ministers, and soon came to share their unpopularity. The truce with France had offended the natural pride of the nation, which still refused to own itself beaten. The evacuation of the French fortresses in Maine and elsewhere, which was the price paid for the suspension of arms, was bitterly resented.

Indeed the garrisons had to be threatened with the use of force before they would quit their strongholds. A violent clamour was raised against Suffolk and Somerset, and Humphrey of Gloucester emerged from his retirement to head the agitation. This led to his death; he was arrested by the order of the queen and the ministers at the parliament of Bury. Five days later he died suddenly in prison, probably by foul play, though it was given out that he had been carried off by a paralytic stroke. His estates were confiscated, and distributed among the friends of Suffolk and the queen. Six weeks later the aged Bishop Beaufort followed him to the grave—he had no share in Gloucester's fate, having long before made over his power and the leadership of his party to his nephew Edmund of Somerset (1447). The truce• with France lasted for two years after the death of Duke Humphrey, and came to an end partly owing to the eagerness of the French to push their advantages, but Renewal much more from the treachery and bad faith of Suffolk of the war and Somerset, who gave the enemy an admirable with casus See also:

belli. By their weakness, or perhaps with their France. secret connivance, the English garrisons of Normandy carried out plundering raids of the most impudent sort on French territory. When summoned to punish the offenders, and to make monetary compensation, Suffolk and Somerset shuffled and prevaricated, but gave no See also:satisfaction. Thereupon the French king once more declared war (July 1449) and invaded Normandy. Somerset was in command; he showed hopeless incapacity and timidity, and in a few months the duchy which had been so long held by the swords of Bedford, York and Shrewsbury was hopelessly lost. The final blow came when a small army of relief sent over from England was absolutely exterminated by the French at the battle of Formigny (April 15, 1450).

Somerset, who had retired into Caen, surrendered two months later after a feeble defence, and the English power in northern France came to an end. Even before this final disaster the indignation felt against Suffolk and Somerset had raised violent disturbances at home. Suffolk was impeached on many charges, true and false; it was unfair to accuse him of treason, but /ack quite just to lay double-dealing and bad faith to his Rebels Rebellion. charge. The king tried to save him from the block by banishing him before he could be tried. But while he was sailing to Flanders his ship was intercepted by some London vessels, which were on the look-out for him, and he was deliberately murdered. The instigators of the act were never discovered. But, though Suffolk was gone, Somerset yet survived, and their partisans still engrossed the confidence of the king. To clear out the government, and punish those responsible for the late disasters, the commons of Kent rose in insurrection under a captain who called himself John Mortimer, though his real name seems to have been John See also:

Cade. He was a. soldier of fortune who had served in the French wars, and claimed to be in the confidence of the duke of York, the person to whom the eyes of all who hated Somerset and the present regime were now directed. Cade was not a social reformer, like his predecessor Wat Tyler, with whom he has often been compared, but a politician. Though he called himself " John Amend-all," and promised to put down abuses of every kind, the main part of the pro-gramme which he issued was intended to appeal to national sentiment, not to class feeling.

Whether he was the tool of other and more highly placed malcontents, or whether he was simply a ready-witted adventurer playing his own game, it is hard to determine. His first success was marvellous; he defeated the Death of Humphrey of Gloucester and Henry Beaufort. Loss of Normandy. Yet he was a cautious and in the main a well-intentioned prince, and the extreme moderation of his original demands seems tc prove that he did not at first aim at the crown. He merely required that Somerset and his friends should be dismissed from office and made to answer for their misgovernment. Though he backed his demands by armed demonstration—twice calling out his friends and retainers to support his policy—he carefully refrained for five long years from actual violence. Indeed in 1452 he consented to abandon his protests, and to lend his aid to the other party for a great national object, the recovery of Guienne. For in the previous year Charles VII. had dealt with Bordeaux and Bayonne as he had already dealt with Normandy, and had met with no better resistance while completing the conquest. Six months' experience of French rule, however, had revealed to the Bordelais how much they had lost when they surrendered. Their old loyalty to the house of Plantagenet burst once more into See also:

flame; they rose in arms and called for aid to England. For a moment the quarrel of York and Somerset was suspended, and the last English army that crossed the seas during theHundredYears'War landed in Guienne, joined the insurgents, and for a time swept all before it. But there seemed to he a curse on whatever Henry VI. and Somerset took in hand.

On the 17th of July 1453 the veteran earl of Shrewsbury and the greater part of his Anglo-Gascon host were Battle of cut to pieces at the hard-fought battle of Castillon. Castillon. Bordeaux, though left to defend itself, held out for Loss of eighty days after Talbot's defeat and death, and then Ouienne. made its final submission to the French. The long struggle was over, and England now retained nothing of her old transmarine possessions save Calais and the Channel Islands. The ambition of Henry V. had finally cost her the long-loyal Guienne, as well as all the ephemeral conquests of his own sword. The last crowning disaster of the administration of the favourites of Henry VI. put an end to the chance that a way out of domestic strife might be found in the vigorous See also:

prosecution of the French war. For the next twenty years the battles of England were to be fought on her own soil, and between her own sons. It was a righteous punishment for her interference in the unnatural strife of Orleanists and Burgundians that the struggle between York and Lancaster was to be as bitter and as bloody as that between the two French factions. V. THE WARS OF THE ROSES (1453-1497) causes by different historians. To some their origin is mainly king's troops, made a triumphant entry into London and held the city for two days. He seized and beheaded Lord Saye, the treasurer, and several other unpopular persons, and might have continued his dictatorship for some time if the Kentish mob that followed him had not fallen to general pillage and arson.

This led to the same results that had been seen in Tyler's day. The propertied classes in London took arms to suppress anarchy, and beat the insurgents out of the city. Cade, striving to keep up the rising outside the walls, was killed in a skirmish a month later, and his bands dispersed. But the troubles of England were only just beginning; the protest against the misgovernment of Somerset and the rest Richard, of the confidants of the king and queen was now duke of taken up by a more important personage than the York, adventurer Cade. Richard, duke of York, the heir heads the to the claims of the house of Mortimer--his mother opposition. constitutional. Henry VI., it is argued, had broken the tacit compact which the house of Lancaster had made with the nation; instead of committing the administration of the realm origin of to ministers chosen for him by, or at least approved the wars by, his parliament, he persisted in retaining in office ofthe persons like Suffolk and Somerset, who had for- Roses. feited the confidence of the people by their many failures in war and diplomacy, and were suspected of something worse than incapacity. They might not be so personally odious as the favourites of Edward II. or of Henry III., but they were even more dangerous to the state, because they were not foreign adventurers but great English peers. In spite of the warnings given by the assault on Suffolk in 1450, by See also:

Jack Cade's insurrection, and by the first armed demonstrations of Richard of York in 1450 and 1452, the king persisted in keeping his friends in office, and they had to be removed by the familiar and forcible methods that had been applied in earlier ages by the lords ordainers or the lords appellant. Undoubtedly there is much truth in this view of the situation; if Henry VI., or perhaps we should rather say, if his queen Margaret of Anjou, had been content'to accept ministries in which the friends of Richard of York were fairly represented, it is probable that he might have died a king, and have transmitted his crown to his natural heir. But this explanation of the Wars of the Roses is not complete; it accounts for their outbreak, but not for their long continuance. According to another school the real See also:key to the problem is simply the question of the succession to the crown.

If the wedlock of Henry VI. and Margaret of Anjou had claims of been fruitful during the first few years after their the duke marriage, no one would have raised the question of a of York to change of dynasty. But when they remained childless the crown for seven years, and strong suspicion arose that there was a project on foot to declare the Beauforts heirs to the throne, the claim of Richard of York, as the representative of the houses of Clarence and March, was raised by those who viewed the possible accession of the incapable and unpopular Somerset with terror and dislike. When once the claims of York had been displayed and stated by his imprudent partisan, Thomas See also:

Yonge, in the parliament of 1451, there was no possibility of. hiding the fact that in the strict legitimate line of succession he had a better claim than the reigning king. He disavowed any pretensions to the crown for nine years; it was only in 1460 that he set forth his title with his own mouth. But his friends and followers were not so discreet; hence when a son was at last born to Henry and Margaret, in 1453, the succession question was already in the See also:air and could no longer be ignored. If the claim of York was superior to that of Lancaster in the eyes of a consider-able part of the nation, it was no longer possible to consider the problem solved by the birth of a direct heir to the actual occupant of the throne. Though Duke Richard behaved in the most correct fashion, acknowledged the infant Edward as prince of Wales, and made no attempt to assert dynastic claims during his two regencies in 1454 and 1455-1456, yet the queen and her partisans already looked upon him as a pretender to the throne. It is this fact which accounts for the growing bitterness of the Yorkist and Lancastrian parties during the last years of Henry VI. Margaret believed herself to be defending the rights Margare, of her son against a would-be usurper. Duke Richard, on the other hand, considered himself as wrongfully oppressed, and excluded from his legitimate position as a prince of the blood and a chief councillor of the crown. Nor can there be any doubt that the queen took every opportunity of showing her suspicion of him, and deliberately kept him and his friends from sharing in the administration of the realm. This might have been more tolerable if the Lancastrian party had shown any governing power; but both while Somerset was their leader, down to his death in the first battle of St Albans, and while in 1456-1459 Exeter, Wiltshire, Shrewsbury and See also:Beaumont were the queen's trusted agents, the condition of England was de.

The Wars of the Roses have been ascribed to many different plorable. As a contemporary chronicler wrote, " the realm was out of all good governance—as it has been many days before: Birth of Edward, prince of Wales. 516 ENGLISH HISTORY [1450-1460 the king was simple, and led by covetous councillors, and owed more than he was worth. His debts increased daily, but pay- ment was there none, for all the manors and posses-Condition sions that pertained to the crown he had given away, 0 otry so that he had almost nought to live on. For these misgovernances the hearts of the people were turned from them that had the land in rule, and their blessing was turned to cursing. The officers of the realm, and especially the earl of Wiltshire the treasurer, for to enrich himself plundered poor people and disinherited rightful heirs, and did many wrongs. The queen was defamed, that he that was called the prince was not the king's son, but a bastard gotten in See also:

adultery." When it is added that the Lancastrian party avoided holding a parliament for three years, because they dared not face it, and that the French were allowed to sack See also:Fowey, See also:Sandwich and other places because there was no English fleet in existence, it is not wonderful that many men thought that the See also:cup of the iniquities of the house of Lancaster was full. In the military classes it was felt that the honour of the realm was lost; in See also:mercantile circles it was thought that the continuance for a few years more of such government would make an end of English trade. Some excuse must be found for getting rid of the queen and her friends, and the doubtful See also:legitimacy of the Lancastrian claim to the crown afforded such an excuse. Hence came the curious See also:paradox, that the party which started as the See also:advocates of the rights of parliament against the incapable ministers appointed by the crown, ended by challenging the right of parliament, exercised in 1399, to depose a legitimate king and substitute for him another member of the royal house. For Richard of York in 146o and Edward IV. in 1461 put in their claim to the throne, not as the elect of the nation, but as the possessors of a divine hereditary right to the succession, there having been no true king of England since the death of Richard II. Hence Edward assumed the royal title in March 1461, was crowned in June, but called no parliament till November.

When it met, it acknowledged him as king, but made no pretence of creating or electing him to be sovereign. But putting aside the constitutional aspects of the Wars of the Roses, it is necessary to point out that they had another Motives of aspect. From one point of view they were little more the con- than a great faction fight between two alliances of tending over-powerful barons. Though the Lancastrians parties. made much play with the watchword of loyalty to the crown, and though the Yorkists never forgot to speak of the need for strong and wise governance, and the welfare of the realm, yet personal and family enmities had in many cases more effect in determining their action than a zeal for King Henry's rights or for the prosperity of England. It is true that some classes were undoubtedly influenced in their choice of sides mainly by the general causes spoken of above; the citizens of London and the other great towns (for example) inclined to the Yorkist faction simply because they saw that under the Lancastrian rule the foreign trade of England was being ruined, and insufficient security was given for life and property. But the leading men among the baronage were undoubtedly swayed by ambition and resentment, by family ties and family feuds, far more than by enlightened statesmanship or zeal for the king or the common-weal. It would be going too far to seek the origin of the Yorkist party—as some have done—in the old enmity of the houses of March, Norfolk and Salisbury against Henry IV. But it is not so fantastic to ascribe its birth to the personal hatred that existed between Richard of York and Edmund of Somerset, to the old family grudge (going back to 14o5) between the Percies and the Nevilles, to the marriage alliance that bound the houses of York and Neville together, and to other less well-remembered quarrels or blood-ties among the lesser baronage. As an example of how such motives worked, it may suffice to quote the case of those old enemies, the Bonvilles and Courtenays, in the west country. While Lord Bonville supported the queen, the house of Courtenay were staunch Yorkists, and the earl of Devon joined in the armed demonstration of Duke Richard in 1452. But when the earl changed his politics and fought on the Lancastrian side at St Albans in 1455, the baron at once became a strenuous adherent of the duke, adhered firmly to the white rose and died by the axe for its cause. Richard of York, in short, was not merely the head of a constitutional opposition to misgovernment by the queen's friends, nor was he merely a legitimist claimant The to the crown, he was also the head of a powerful baronial baronial league, of which the most prominent members party. were his kinsmen, the Nevilles, Mowbrays and The Bourchiers.

The Nevilles alone, enriched with the Nevilles. ancient estates of the Beauchamps and Montagus, and with five of their name in the House of Lords, were a sufficient nucleus for a faction. They were headed by the two most capable politicians and soldiers then alive in England, the two Richards, father and son, who held the earldoms of Salisbury and Warwick, and were respectively brother-in-law and nephew to York. It must be remembered that a baron of 1450 was not strong merely by reason of the spears and bows of his household and his tenantry, like a baron of the 13th century. The pernicious practice of " See also:

livery and maintenance " was now at its zenith; all over England in times of stress the knighthood and gentry were wont to pledge themselves, by sealed bonds of See also:indenture, to follow the magnate whom- they thought best able to protect them. They mounted his badge, and joined his banner when strife broke out, in, return for his championship of their private interests and his promise to " maintain " them against all their enemies. A soldier and statesman of the ability and ambition of Richard of Warwick counted hundreds of such adherents, scattered over twenty shires. The system had spread so far that the majority of the smaller tenants-in-chief, and even many of the lesser barons, were the sworn followers of an insignificant number of the greater lords. An alliance of half-a-dozen of these over-powerful subjects was a serious danger to the crown. For the king could no longer count on raising a national army against them; he could only call out the adherents of the lords of his own party. The factions were fairly balanced, for if the majority of the baronage were, on the whole, Lancastrian, the greatest houses stood by the cause of York. Despite all this, there was still, when the wars began, a very strong feeling in favour of compromise and moderation. For this there can be no doubt that Richard of York was mainly responsible.

When he was twice placed in Attitude of power, during the two protectorates which followed Richard of York. Henry's two long fits of insanity in 1454 and 1455-1456, he carefully avoided any oppression of his enemies, though he naturally took care to put his own friends in office. Most of all did he show his sincere wish for peace by twice laying down the See also:

protectorate when the king was restored to sanity. He was undoubtedly gcaded into his last rebellion of 1459 by the queen's undisguised preparations for attacking him. Yet because he struck first, without waiting for a definite casus belli, public opinion declared so much against him that half his followers refused to rally to his banner. The revulsion only came when the queen, victorious after the rout of Ludford, Suppresapplied to the vanquished Yorkists those penalties of lion of confiscation and See also:attainder which Duke Richard had York's always refused to employ in his day of power. After rEebexecu- fllon. the harsh doings at the parliament of Coventry (1459), dons and and the commencement of political executions by the confiscasending of Roger Neville and his fellows to the See also:scaffold, dons. the trend of public opinion veered round, and Margaret and her friends were rightly held responsible for the embittered nature of the strife. Hence came the marvellous success of the Yorkist counterstroke in June 146o, when the exiled Warwick, landing in Kent with a mere handful of men, was suddenly joined by the whole of the south of England and the The earl of citizens of London, and inflicted a crushing defeat on Wfrwick defeats the the Lancastrians at Northampton before he had been Lancasfifteen days on shore (July ro, 1460). The growing trlans at rancour of the struggle was marked by the fact that mp eo the Yorkists, after Northampton, showed themselves by no means so merciful and scrupulous as in their earlier days. Retaliatory executions began, though on a small scale, and when York reached London he at last began to talk of his rights to the crown, and to propose the deposition of Henry VI. Yet moderation was still so far prevalent in the ranks of his adherents that they refused to follow him to such lengths.

Warwick and the other leading men of the party dictated a compromise, by which Henry was to reign for the term of his Richard of natural life, but Duke Richard was to be recognized York de- as his heir and to succeed him on the throne. They dared heir had obviously borrowed the expedient from the terms to the of the treaty of Troyes. But the act of parliament throne. which embodied it did not formally disinherit the reigning king's son, as the treaty of Troyes had done, but merely ignored his existence. It would have been well for England if this agreement had held, and the crown had passed peaceably to the house of York, after the comparatively short and bloodless struggle which had just ended. But Duke Richard had forgotten to reckon with the fierce and unscrupulous energy of Queen Margaret, when she was at bay in defence of her son's rights. Marching with a trifling Battle of force to expel her from the north, he was surprised and See also:

Wakefield. slain at Wakefield (Dec. 30, 1460). But it was not his Richard death that was the main misfortune, but the fact slain. that in the battle the Lancastrians gave no quarter to small or great, and that after it they put to death York's brother-in-law Salisbury and other prisoners. The heads of the duke and the earl were set up over the gates of York. This ferocity was repeated when Margaret and her northern host beat Warwick at the second battle of St Albans (Feb. 17, 1461), where they had the good fortune to recover possession of the person of King Henry.

Lord Bonville and the other captives of rank were beheaded next morning. After this it was but natural that the struggle became a mere record of massacres and executions. The Yorkists proclaimed Edward, Duke Richard's heir, king of England; they took no further heed of the claims of King Henry, declared their leader the true successor of Richard II., and stigmatized the whole period of the Lancastrian rule as a mere usurpation. They adopted a strict legitimist theory of the descent of the crown, and denied the right of parliament to deal with the succession. This was the first step in the direction of absolute monarchy which England had seen since the short months of King Richard's tyranny in 1397-1399. It was but the first of many encroachments of the new dynasty upon the liberties that had been enjoyed by the nation under the house of Lancaster. The revenge taken by the new king and his cousin Richard of Warwick for the slaughter at Wakefield and St Albans was prompt and dreadful. They were now well supported by the Changed whole of southern England; for not only had the character of the war, queen's ferocity shocked the nation, but the reckless plundering of her northern See also:

moss-troopers in the home counties had roused the peasantry and townsfolk to an interest in the struggle which they had never before displayed. Up to this moment the civil war had been conducted like a great faction fight; the barons and their liveried retainers had been wont to seek some convenient See also:heath or hill and there to fight out their quarrel with the minimum of damage to the countryside. The deliberate harrying of the Midlands by Margaret's northern levies was a new departure, and one bitterly resented. The house of Lancaster could never for the future count on an adherent south of Trent or east of Chiltern. The Yorkist army that marched in pursuit of the raiders, and won the bloody field of See also:Towton under Warwick's guidance, gave no quarter.

Not only was the slaughter in that battle and the pursuit more cruel than anything that had been seen since the day of Evesham, but the executions that followed were ruthless. Ere Edward turned south he had be- headed two earls—Devon and Wiltshire—and forty- two knights, and had hanged many prisoners of lesser estate. The Yorkist parliament of November 1461 carried on the work by attainting 133 persons, ranging from Henry VI. and Queen Margaret down through the See also:

peerage and the knighthood to the clerks and household retainers of the late king. All the estates of the Lancastrian lords, living or dead, were confiscated, and their blood was declared corrupted. This brought into the king's hands such a mass of plunder as no one had handled since William the Conqueror. Edward IV. could not only reward his adherents with it, so as to personal create a whole new court noblesse, but had enough rule of over to fill his exchequer for many years, and to Edward enable him to dispense with parliamentary grants of -v money for an unexampled period. Between 1461 and 1465 he only asked for £37,000 from the nation—and won no small popularity thereby. For, in their joy at being quit of taxation, men forgot that they were losing the See also:lever by which their fathers had been wont to move the crown to constitutional concessions. After Towton peace prevailed south of the Tyne and east of the Severn, for it was only in Northumberland and in Wales that the survivors of the Lancastrian faction succeeded civil war in keeping the war alive. King Edward, as indolent in the and pleasure-loving in times of ease as he was active north and and ruthless in times of stress and battle, set himself west. to enjoy life, handing over the suppression of the rebels to his ambitious and untiring cousin Richard of Warwick. The annals of the few contemporary chroniclers are so entirely devoted to the bickerings in the extreme north and west, that it is necessary to insist on the fact that from 1461 onwards the civil war was purely local, and nine-tenths of the realm enjoyed what passed for peace in the 15th century.

The campaigns of 1462-63-64, though full of incident and bloodshed, were not of first-rate political importance. The cause of Lancaster had been lost at Towton, and all that Queen Margaret succeeded in accomplishing was to keep Northumberland in revolt, mainly by means of French and Scottish succours. Her last English partisans, attainted men who had lost their lands and lived with the See also:

shadow of the axe ever before them, fought bitterly enough. But the obstinate and hard-handed Warwick beat them down again and again, and the old Lancastrian party was Battle of almost exterminated when the last of its chiefs went See also:Hexham, to the block in the series of wholesale executions that Imprison- followed the battle of Hexham (May 15, 1464). A meat of Henry year later Henry VI. himself fell into the hands of his enemies, as he lurked in See also:Lancashire, and with his See also:consignment to the Tower the dynastic question seemed finally solved in favour of the house of York. The first ten years of the reign of Edward IV. fall into two parts, the dividing point being the avowal of the king's marriage to See also:Elizabeth Woodville in November 1464. During the Richard first of these periods Edward reigned but Warwick Neville, governed; he was not only the fighting man, but the earl of statesman and diplomatist of the Yorkist party, and Warwick. enjoyed a complete ascendancy over his young master, who long preferred thriftless ease to the toils of personal monarchy. Warwick represented the better side of the victorious cause; he was no mere factious king-maker, and his later See also:nickname of " the last of the barons " by no means expresses his character or his position. He was strong, not so much by reason of his vast estates and his numerous retainers, as by reason of the confidence which the greater part of the nation placed in him. He never forgot that the Yorkist party had started as the advocates of See also:sound and strong administration, and the mandatories of the popular will against the queen's incapable and corrupt ministers. " He ever had the See also:goodwill of the people because he knew how to give them fair words, and always spoke not of himself but of the See also:augmentation and good governance of the kingdom, for which he would spend his life; and thus he had the goodwill of England, so that in all the land he was the lord who was held in most esteem and faith and See also:credence." As long as he remained supreme, parliaments were regularly held, and the house of York appeared to be keeping its bargain with the nation. His policy was sound; peace with France, the re-habilitation of the dwindling foreign trade of England, and the Battle of St Afbans.

Edward, earl of March, pro-claimed as Edward IV. Battle of Towton. Ruthless See also:

reprisals of the Yorkists. maintenance of law and justice by strong-handed governance were his main aims. But Warwick was one of those ministers who love to do every-thing for themselves, and chafe at masters and colleagues who presume to check or to criticise their actions. He was surrounded and supported, moreover, by a group of brothers and cousins, to whom he gave most of his confidence, and most of the preferment that came to his hands. England has always chafed against a family oligarchy, however well it may do its work. The Yorkist magnates who did not belong to the See also:clan of the Nevilles were not unnaturally jealous of that house, and Edward IV. himself gradually came to realize the ignominious position of a king who is managed and overruled by a strong-willed and arbitrary minister. His first sign of revolt was his secret marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, a lady of decidedly Lancastrian connexions, for her father and her first husband were both members of the defeated faction. Warwick was at the moment suing for the hand of Louis XI.'s sister-in-law in his master's name, and had to back out of his negotiations in a sudden and somewhat ridiculous fashion. His pride was hurt, but for two years more there was no open breach between him and his master, though their estrangement grew more and more marked when Edward continued to heap titles and estates on his wife's numerous relatives, and to conclude for them marriage alliances with all the great Yorkist families Breach who were not of the Neville connexion. In this way between he built up for himself a personal following within the Warwick Yorkist party; but the relative strength of this faction and the and of that which still looked upon Warwick as the king. true representative of the cause had yet to be tried.

The king had in his favour the prestige of the royal name, and a popularity won by his easy-going affability and his liberal gifts. The earl had his established reputation for disinterested devotion to the welfare of the realm, and his brilliant record as a soldier and statesman. In districts as far apart as Kent and Yorkshire, his word counted for a good deal more than that of his sovereign. Unhappily for England and for himself, Warwick's loyalty was not sufficient to restrain his ambition and his resentment. He felt the ingratitude, of the king, whom he had Warwkk made, so bitterly that he stooped ere long to intrigue organizes arebellion. and treason. Edward in 1467 openly broke with him by dismissing his brother See also:

George Neville from the chancellorship, by repudiating a treaty with France which the earl had just negotiated, and by concluding an alliance with Burgundy against which he had always protested. Warwick en- listed in his cause the king's younger brother George of Clarence, who desired to marry his daughter and heiress Isabella Neville, and with the aid of this unscrupulous but unstable young man began to organize rebellion. His first experiment in treason was Rising of the so-called " rising of See also:Robin of See also:Redesdale," which "Robin of was ostensibly an armed protest by the gentry and Redes- commons of Yorkshire against the maladministration See also:dale." of the realm by the king's favourites—his wife's relatives, and the courtiers whom he had lately promoted to high rank and office. The rebellion was headed by well-known adherents of the earl, and the nickname of " Robin of Redesdale seems to have covered the personality of his kinsman Sir John Conyers. When the rising was well started Warwick declared his sympathy with the aims of the insurgents, wedded his daughter to Clarence despite the king's See also:prohibition of the match, and raised a force at Calais with which he landed in Kent. But his plot was already successful before he reached the See also:scene of operations. The Yorkshire rebels beat the royalist army at Battle of the battle of Edgecott (July 6, 1469).

A few days later Edgecott. Edward himself was captured at See also:

Olney and put into Edward a the earl's hands. Many of his chief supporters, includprisoner. ing the queen's father, Lord See also:Rivers, and her brother, John Woodville, as well as the newly-created earls of Pembroke and Devon, were put to death with Warwick's connivance, if not by his direct orders. The king was confined for someweeks in the great Neville stronghold of Middleham Castle, but presently released on conditions, being compelled to accept new ministers nominated by Warwick. The earl supposed that his cousin's spirit was broken and that he would give Execution no further trouble. In this he erred grievously. of the Edward vowed revenge for his slaughtered favourites, queen's and waited his opportunity. Warwick had lost relatlres. credit by using such underhand methods in his attack on his master, and had not taken sufficient care to conciliate public opinion when he reconstructed the government. His conduct had destroyed his old reputation for disinterestedness and honesty. In March 1470 the king seized the first chance of avenging him-self. Some unimportant riots had broken out in Lincolnshire, originating probably in mere local quarrels, but possibly King in Lancastrian intrigues. To suppress this rising the Edward king gathered a great force, carefully calling in to his drives banner all the peers who were offended with Warwick Warwick or, at any rate, did not belong to his family alliance. into exits. Having scattered the Lincolnshire bands, he suddenly turned upon Warwick with his army, and caught him wholly unprepared.

The earl and his son-in-law Clarence were hunted out of the realm before they could collect their partisans, and fled to France; Edward seemed for the first time to be master in his own realm. But the Wars of the Roses had one more phase to come. Warwick's name was still a power in the land, and his expulsion had been so sudden that he had not been given an Warwick opportunity of trying his strength. His old enmity takes up for the house of Lancaster was completely swallowed the cause up in his new grudge against the king that he had of Henry made. He opened negotiations with the exiled Queen Margaret, and offered to place his sword at her disposition for the purpose of overthrowing King Edward and restoring King Henry. The queen had much difficulty in forcing herself to come to terms with the man who had been the bane of her cause, but finally, was induced by Louis XI. to conclude a bargain. Warwick married his younger daughter to her son Edward, prince of Wales, as a pledge of his good faith, and swore allegiance to King Henry in the See also:

cathedral of See also:Angers. He then set himself to stir up the Yorkshire adherents of the house of Neville to distract the attention of Edward IV. When the king had gone northward to attack them, the earl landed He lands at See also:Dartmouth (Sept. 1470) with a small force partly l ',gland. composed of Lancastrian exiles, partly of his own men. His appearance had the effect on which he had calculated. Devon rose in the Lancastrian interest; Kent, where the earl's name had always been popular, took arms a few days later; and London opened its gates.

King Edward, hurrying south to oppose the invader, found his army melting away from his banner, and hastily took ship at Lynn and fled to Holland. He found a refuge with his brother-in-law and ally Charles the Bold, the great duke of Burgundy. King Henry was released and replaced on the throne, and for six months Warwick ruled England as his lieutenant. But there was bitterness and mistrust between the old Lancastrian faction and the Nevilles, and Queen Margaret Restoorarefused to cross to England or to trust her son in the Henry Vi. king-maker's hands. Her partisans doubted his sincerity, while many of the Yorkists who had hitherto followed Warwick in blind admiration found it impossible to reconcile themselves to the new regime. The duke of Clarence in particular, discontented at the triumph of Lancaster, betrayed his father-in-law, and opened secret negotiations with his exiled brother. Encouraged by the news of the dissensions among his enemies, Edward IV. resolved to try his fortune once more, and landed near Hull on the 15th of March Edward returns to 1471 with a body of mercenaries lent him by the England. duke of Burgundy. The campaign that followed was most creditable to Edward's generalship, but must have been fatal to him if Warwick had been honestly supported by his Edward iv. marries Ei.'zabeth Woodville. King Edward in exile. lieutenants. But the duke of Clarence betrayed to his brother the army which he had gathered in King Henry's name, and Battle of many of the Lancastrians were slow to join the earl, See also:

Barnet. from their distrust of his loyalty.

Edward, dashing Death of through the midst of the slowly gathering levies of Warwick. his opponents, seized London, and two days later defeated and slew Warwick at the battle of Barnet (April 13, 1471). On that same day Queen Margaret and her son landed at Weymouth, only to hear that the earl was dead and his army scattered. But she refused to consider the struggle ended, and gathered the Lancastrians of the west for a final rally. On the fatal day of See also:

Tewkesbury (May 3, 1471) her army was beaten, her son was slain in the flight, and the greater part of her chief captains were taken prisoner. She herself was captured next day. The victorious Edward sent to the block the last Beaufort duke of Somerset, and nearly all the other captains of rank, whether Lancastrians or followers of. Warwick. He then moved to London, which was being threatened by Kentish levies raised in Warwick's name, delivered the city, and next day caused the unhappy Henry VI. to be murdered in the Tower (May 21, 1471). The descendants of Henry IV. were now See also:extinct, and the succession question seemed settled for ever. No one dreamed of raising against King Edward the claims of the remoter heirs of John of Gaunt—the young earl of Richmond, who represented the Beauforts by a female descent, or the king of Portugal, the grandson of Gaunt's eldest daughter. Edward was now king indeed, with no over-powerful cousin at his See also:elbow to curb his will. He had, moreover, at his disposal plunder almost as valuable as that which he had divided up in 1461—the estates of the great Neville clan and their adherents.

A great career seemed open before him; he had proved himself a fine soldier and an unscrupulous diplomatist; he was in the very prime of life, having not yet attained his thirty-first year. He might have devoted himself to foreign politics and have rivalled the exploits of Edward III. or Henry V.—for the state of the continent was all in his favour—or might have set himself to organize an absolute monarchy on the ruins of the parliament and the baronage. For the successive attainders of the Lancastrians and the Nevilles had swept away many of the older noble families, and Edward's house of peers consisted for the main part of new men, his own partisans promoted for good service, who had not the grip on the land that their predecessors had possessed. But Edward either failed to see his opportunity or refused to take it. He did not plunge headlong into the wars of Louis XI. and Charles of Burgundy, nor did he attempt to recast of filling his See also:

purse were often unconstitutional and sometimes ignominious. When the resources drawn from confiscations were exhausted, he raised " benevolences "—forced Fiscal gifts extracted from men of wealth by the unspoken policy. threat of the royal displeasure—instead of applying to parliament for new taxes. But his most profitable source of revenue was drawn from abroad. Having allied himself with his brother-in-law Charles of Burgundy against the king of France, he led an army into Picardy in 1475, and then by the treaty of Picquigny sold peace to Louis XI. for 75,000 gold crowns down, and an annual See also:pension (or tribute as he preferred to call it) of 50,000 crowns more. It was regularly paid up to the last year of his reign. Charles the Bold, whom he had thus deliberately deserted in the middle of their joint campaign, used the strongest language about this mean act of treachery, and with good cause. But the king cared not when his pockets were full.

Another device of Edward for filling his exchequer was a very stringent enforcement of justice; small infractions of the laws being made the excuse for exorbitant fines. This was a trick which Henry VII. was to turn to still greater effect. In defence of both it may be pleaded that after the anarchy of the Wars of the Roses a strong hand was needed to restore security for life and property, and that it was better that penalties should be over-heavy rather than that there should be no penalties at all. Another appreciable source of revenue to Edward was his private commercial ventures. He owned many ships, and traded with great profit to himself abroad, because he could promise, as a king, advantages to foreign buyers and sellers with which no mere merchant could compete. During the last period of Edward's rule England might have been described as a despotism, if only the king had cared to be a See also:

despot. But except on rare occasions he allowed his power to be disguised under the old machinery of the medieval monarchy, and made no See also:parade of his autocracy. Much was pardoned by the nation to one who gave them comparatively efficient and rather cheap government, and who was 'personally easy of See also:access, affable and humorous. It is with little justification that he has been called the " founder of the new monarchy," and the spiritual ancestor of the Tudor despotism. Another king in his place might have merited such titles, but Edward was too careless, too unsystematic, too lazy, and too fond of self-See also:indulgence to make a real tyrant. He preferred to be a man of pleasure and leisure, only awaking now and then to perpetrate some act of arbitrary cruelty. England was not unprosperous under him.

The lowest point of her fortunes had been reached under the administration of Margaret of Anjou, during the weary years that pre-ceded the outbreak of the civil wars in 1459. At that conrsedition time the government had been bankrupt, foreign country. coutrade had almost disappeared, the French and pirates of all nations had possession of the Channel, and the nation had lost heart, because there seemed no way out of the trouble save domestic strife, to which all looked forward with dismay. The actual war proved less disastrous than had been expected. It fell heavily upon the baronage and their retainers, but passed lightly, for the most part, over the heads of the middle classes. The Yorkists courted the approval of public opinion by their careful avoidance of pillage and requisitions; and the Lancastrians, though less scrupulous, only once launched out into general raiding and devastation, during the advance of the queen's army to St Albans in the early months of 1461. As a rule the towns suffered little or nothing—they submitted to the king of the moment, and were always spared by the victors. It is one of the most curious features of these wars that no town ever stood a siege, though there were several long and arduous sieges of baronial castles, such as Harlech, Alnwick and See also:

Barn-borough. Warwick, with his policy of conciliation for the masses and hard blows for the magnates, was mainly responsible for this moderation. In battle he was wont to bid his followers spare the commons in the pursuit, and to smite only the knights and nobles. Towton, where the Yorkist army was infuriated by the harrying of the Midlands by their enemies in the preceding Battle of Tewkesbury. Death of Edward, prince of Wales.

Capture of Queen Margaret and murder of Henry VI. Edward lv. character the institutions of the realm. He settled down into of the reign, inglorious ease, varied at long intervals by outbursts of spasmodic tyranny. It would seem that the key to his conduct was that he hated the hard work without which a despotic king cannot hope to assert his personality, and preferred leisure and vicious self-indulgence. In many ways the later years of his reign were marked with all the signs of See also:

absolutism. Between 1475 and 1483 he called only one single parliament, and that was summoned not to give him advice, or raise him money, but purely and solely to See also:attaint his brother of Clarence, whom he had resolved to destroy. The Murder of duke's fate (Feb. 17, 1478) need provoke no sympathy, the duke of Clarence, he was a detestable intriguer, and had given his brother just offence by a series of deeds of high-handed violence and by perpetual cavilling. But he had committed no act of real treason since his long-pardoned alliance with Warwick, and was not in any way dangerous; so that when the king caused him to be attainted, and then privately murdered in the Tower, there was little justification for the fratricide. Edward was a thrifty king; he was indeed the only medieval monarch of England who succeeded in keeping free of debt and made his revenue suffice for his expenses. But his methods campaign, was the only fight that ended in a general discouraged fortresses in private hands, and the dwellings of the massacre.

There were, of course, many local feuds and riots new nobility of Edward IV. were rather splendid manor-houses, which led to the destruction of property; well-known instances with some slight external protection of See also:

moat and gate-are the private war about Caister Castle between the duke of i house, than old-fashioned castles. But the church- texture. Norfolk and the Pastons, and the " battle of Nibley See also:Green," building of the time is enormous and magnificent. near Bristol, between the Berkeleys and the Talbots. But on A very large proportion of the great Perpendicular churches of the whole there was no ruinous devastation if the land. Pro- England date back to this age, and in the cathedrals also much sperity seems to have revived early during the rule of York; work was going on. Warwick had cleared the seas of pirates, and both he and King Material prosperity does not imply spiritual development, Edward were great patrons of commerce, though the earl's and it must be confessed that from the intellectual and moral policy was to encourage trade with France, while his master point of view 15th-century England presents an un- Religious wished to knit up the old alliance with Flanders by adhering pleasing picture. The Wycliffite movement, the one condition Corn- to the cause of Charles of Burgundy. Edward did phenomenon which at the beginning of the century of the urercial much in his later years to develop interchange of seemed to give some promise of better things, had country. develop- commodities with the Baltic, making treaties with died down under persecution. It lingered on in a subterranean meat. the Hanseatic League which displeased the merchants fashion among a small class in the universities and the minor of London, because of the advantageous terms granted to the foreigner. The east coast ports seem to have thriven under his rule, but Bristol was not less prosperous. On the one side, developing the great See also:salt-See also:fish trade, her vessels were encompassing See also:Iceland, and feeling their way towards the See also:Banks of the West; on the other they were beginning to feel their way into the Mediterranean.

The famous William See also:

Canynges, the See also:patriarch of Bristol merchants, possessed 2500 tons of shipping, including some ships of goo tons, and traded in every sea. Yet But the governing powers were not fanatics, See also:bent on seeking we still find complaints that too much merchandize reached out victims; the spirit of Henry V. and Archbishop Arundel and left England in foreign bottoms, and King Edward's treaty was dead. The life of the church seems, indeed, to have been in a more stagnant and torpid condition in this age than at any other period of English history. The great prelates from Cardinal Beaufort down to Archbishops See also:Bourchier and See also:Rotherham, and Bishop John Russell—trusted supporters of the Yorkist dynasty —were mere politicians with nothing spiritual about them. Occasionally they appear in odious positions. Rotherham was the ready tool of Edward IV. in the judicial murder of Clarence. See also:Russell became the obsequious chancellor of Richard III. Bourchier made himself responsible in 1483 for the taking of the little duke of York from his mother's arms in order to place him in the power of his murderous uncle. It is difficult to find a single bishop in the whole period who was respected for his piety or virtue. The best of them were capable statesmen, the worst were mean time-servers. Few of the higher clergy were such patrons of learning as many prelates of earlier ages. William Grey of Ely and James See also:Goldwell of Norwich did something for scholars, and there was one bishop in the period who came to sad grief through an intellectual activity which was rare among his contemporaries.

This was the See also:

eccentric Reginald See also:Pecock of Chichester, who, while setting himself to confute Lollard controversialists, lapsed into heresy by setting " reason " above " authority." He taught that the organization and many of the dogmas of the medieval church should be justified by an appeal to private judgment and the moral law, rather than to the scriptures, the councils, or the fathers. For taking up this dangerous line of defence, and admitting his doubts about several received articles of faith, he was attacked by the Yorkist archbishop Bourchier in 1457, compelled to do penance, and shut up in a monastery for the rest of his life. He seems to have had no school of followers, and his doctrines died with him. In nothing is the general stagnation of the church in the later 15th century shown better than by the gradual cessation of the monastic chronicles. The stream of narrative was still flowing strongly in 140o; by 1485 it has run dry, monas- even St Albans, the mother of historians, produced terms. no annalist after See also:Whethamstede, whose story ceases early in the Wars of the Roses. The only monastic chronicler who went on See also:writing for a few years after the extinction of the house of 'York was the " Croyland continuator." For the last two-thirds of the century the various " London chronicles," the work of laymen, are much more important than anything which was produced in the religious houses. The regular clergy indeed seem to have been sunk in intellectual torpor. Their numbers were falling off, their zeal was gone; there is little good to be said of them save that they were still in some cases endowing clergy, and had some adherents among the townsfolk and even among the peasantry. But the Lollards were a feeble and help-less minority; they no longer produced writers, organizers or missionaries. They continued to be burnt, or more frequently to make forced recantations, under the Yorkist rule, though the list of trials is not a long one. Little can be gathered concerning them from chronicles or official records.

We only know that they continued to exist, and occasionally produced a martyr. with the Hansa was censured mainly for this reason. Internal commerce was evidently developing in a satisfactory style, despite of the wars; in especial raw wool was going out of England in less bulk than of old, because See also:

cloth See also:woven at home was becoming the See also:staple export. The woollen manufactures which had begun in the eastern counties in the 14th century were now spreading all over the land, taking root especially in Somersetshire, Yorkshire and some districts of the Manufac- Midlands. Coventry, the centre of a local woollen ren and wool trade. and See also:dyeing industry, was probably the inland town w which grew most rapidly during the 15th century. Yet there was still a large export of wool to Flanders, and the long See also:pack-trains of the Cotswold flockmasters still wound eastward to the sea for the benefit of the merchants of the staple and the continental manufacturer. As regards domestic See also:agriculture, it has been often stated that the 15th century was the golden age of the English peasant, and State of that his prosperity was little affected either by the the rural unhappy French wars of Henry VI. or by the Wars popula- of the Roses. There is certainly very little evidence of tion. any general discontent among the rural population, such as had prevailed in the times of Edward III. or Richard II. Insurrections that passed as popular, like the risings of Jack Cade and Robin of Redesdale, produced manifestos that spoke of political grievances but hardly mentioned economic ones. There is a See also:bare mention of the Statute of Labourers in Jack Cade's ably drafted chapter of complaints. It would seem that the manorial grudges between landowner and peasant, which had been so fierce in the 14th century, had died down as the lords abandoned the old system of working their demesne by villein labour. They were now for the most part letting out the soil to tenant-farmers at a moderate rent, and the large class of yeomanry created by this movement seem to have been prosperous.

The less popular device of turning old manorial arable land into See also:

sheep-runs was also known, but does not yet seem to have grown so common as to provoke the popular discontents which were to prevail under the Tudors. Probably such labour as was thrown out of work by this tendency was easily absorbed by the growing needs of the towns. Some murmurs are heard about " enclosures," but they are incidental and not widely spread. One of the best tests of the prosperity of England under the Yorkist rule seems to be the immense amount of building that was on hand. Despite the needs of civil war, it was not on castles that the builders' energy was spent; the government England with splendid architectural decorations. But even in the wealthier abbeys we find traces of thriftless administration, idleness, self-indulgence and occasionally grave moral scandals. The parochial clergy were probably in a healthier condition; but the old abuses of pluralism and non-See also:residence were as rampant as ever, and though their work may have been in many cases honourably carried out, it is certain that energy and intelligence were at a low ebb. The moral faults of the church only reflected those of the nation. It was a hard and selfish generation which witnessed the Wars of the Roses and the dictatorship of Edward IV. The iniquitous French war, thirty years of plunder and demoralization, had corrupted the minds of the governing classes before the civil strife began. Afterwards the constant and easy changes of allegiance, as one faction or the other was in the ascendant, the wholesale confiscations and attainders, the never-ending executions, the sudden prosperity of adventurers, the See also:premium on time-serving and intrigue, sufficed to make the whole nation cynical and sordid. The claim of the Yorkists to represent constitutional opposition to misgovernment became a mere See also:hypocrisy.

The claim of the Lancastrians to represent loyalty soon grew almost as hollow. Edward IV. with his combination of vicious self- indulgence and spasmodic cruelty was no unfit representative of his age. The Poston Letters, that unique collection of the private See also:

correspondence of a typical family of nouveaux riches, thriftless, pushing, unscrupulous, give us the true picture of the time. All that can be said in favour of the Yorkists is that they restored a certain measure of national prosperity, and that their leaders• had one redeeming virtue in their addiction to literature. The learning which had died out in monasteries began to flourish again in the corrupt soil of the court. Most of Edward's favourites had See also:literary tastes. His constable Tiptoft, the " See also:butcher earl " of Worcester, was a figure who might have stepped out of the Italian See also:Renaissance. Influence A See also:graduate of See also:Pavia, a learned lawyer, who translated of the See also:Caesar and See also:Cicero, composed works both in Latin Italian Re- and English, and habitually impaled his victims, he naissance. was a man of a type hitherto unknown in England. Antony, Lord Rivers, the queen's brother, was a mere adventurer, but a poet of some merit, and a great patron of See also:Caxton. Hastings, the Bourchiers, and other of the king's friends were minor patrons of literature. It is curious to find that Caxton, an honest man, and an enthusiast as to the future of the art of See also:printing, which he had introduced into England, waxes enthusiastic as to the merits of the intelligent but unscrupulous peers who took an interest in his endeavours. Of the detestable Tiptoft he writes that " there flowered in virtue and cunning none like him among the lords of the temporalty in See also:science and moral virtue " !

And this is no time-serving praise of a patron, but disinterested tribute to a man who had perished long before on the scaffold. The uneventful latter half of the reign of Edward IV. ended with his death at the age of forty-one on the 9th of April 1483. He had ruined a splendid constitution by the com- bination of sloth and evil living, and during his last years had been sinking slowly into his grave, unable to take the field or to discharge the more laborious duties of royalty. Since Clarence's death he had been gradually falling into the habit of transferring the conduct of great matters of state to his active and hard-working youngest brother, Richard, Richard, duke of Gloucester, who had served him well duke of and faithfully ever since he first took the field at Barnet. OIou- Gloucester passed as a staid and religious prince, and cester. if there was blood on his hands, the same could be said of every statesman of his time. His sudden plunge into crime and usurpation after his brother's death was wholly unexpected by the nation. Indeed it was his previous reputation for loyalty and moderation which made his scandalous coup d'etat of 1483 possible. No prince with a sinister reputation would have had the chance of executing the series of crimes which placed him on the throne. But when Richard declared that he was the victim of plots and intrigues, and was striking down his enemies only to defend his own life and honour, he was for some time believed. At the moment of King Edward's death his elder son by Elizabeth Woodville, Edward, prince of Wales, was twelve; his younger son Richard, duke of York, was nine. It Gloucester was clear that there would be a long minority, and proclaims that the only possible claimants for the regency were himself the queen and Richard of Gloucester. Elizabeth was protector personally unpopular, and the rapacity and insolence of her family was well known.

Hence when Richard of Gloucester seized on the person of the young king, and imprisoned Lord Rivers and Sir Richard Grey, the queen's brother and son, on the pretence that they were conspiring against him, his action was regarded with equanimity by the people. Nor did the fact that the duke took the title of "protector and defender of the realm" cause any surprise. Suspicions only became rife after Richard had seized and beheaded without any trial, Lord Hastings, the late king's most familiar friend, and had arrested at the same moment the archbishop of York, See also:

Morton, bishop of Ely, and Lord See also:Stanley, all persons of unimpeachable loyalty to the house of Edward IV. It was not plausible to accuse such persons of plotting with the queen to overthrow the protector, and public opinion began to turn against Gloucester. Nevertheless he went on recklessly with his design, having already enlisted the support of a party of the greater peers, who were ready to follow him to any length of treason. These confidants, the duke of See also:Buckingham, the lords See also:Howard and Lovel, and a few more, must have known from an early date that he was aiming at the crown, though it is improbable that they suspected that his plan involved the murder of the rightful heirs as well as mere usurpation. On the 16th of June, Richard, using the aged archbishop Bourchier as his tool, got the little duke of York out of his mother's hands, and sent him to join his brother in the Tower. A few days later, having packed London with his own armed retainers and those of Buckingham and his other confidants, he openly put forward his pretensions to the throne. Edward IV., as he asserted, had been privately contracted to Lady Eleanor Talbot before he ever met Queen Elizabeth. His children therefore were bastards, the offspring of a bigamous union. As to the son and daughter of the duke of Clarence, their blood had been corrupted by their father's attainder, and they could not be reckoned as heirs to the crown. He himself, therefore, was the legitimate successor of Edward IV.

This preposterous theory was set forth by Buckingham, first to the mayor and See also:

corporation of London, and next day to an assembly of the estates of the realm held in St Paul's. Cowed by the show of armed force, and remembering the fate of Hastings, the two assemblies received the claim with silence which gave consent. Richard, after a hypocritical show of reluctance, allowed himself to be saluted as king, and was crowned on the 6th of July Richard 1483. Before the coronation ceremony he had issued crowned. orders for the execution of the queen's relatives, who had been in prison since the beginning of May. He paid his adherents lavishly for their support, making Lord Howard duke of Norfolk, and giving Buckingham enormous grants of estates and offices. Having accomplished his coup d'etat Richard started for a royal progress through the Midlands, and a few days after his departure sent back secret orders to London for the murder of his two nephews in the Tower. There is Murder no reason to doubt that they were secretly smothered POrin es. on or about the 15th of July by his agent Sir James Tyrrell, or that the bones found buried under a See also:staircase in the fortress two hundred years after belonged to the two unhappy lads. But the business was kept dark at the time, and it was long before any one could assert with certainty that they were dead or alive. Richard never published any statement as to their end, though some easy tale of a fever, a conflagration, or an accident might have served him better than the mere silence that he employed. For while many persons believed Moral decay of the nation. The " Poston Letters." Death of Edward IV. that the princes still existed there was See also:room for all manner of impostures and false rumours.

The usurper's reign was from the first a troubled one. Less than three months after his coronation the first insurrection broke out; it was headed—strangely enough—by the Bucking- duke of Buckingham, who seems to have been shocked See also:

ham's rebellion. by the murder of the princes; he must have been one of the few who had certain See also:information of the crime. He did not take arms in his own cause, though after the house of York the house of Buckingham had the best claim to the throne, as representing Thomas of Woodstock, the youngest son of Edward III. His plan was to unite the causes of York and Lancaster by See also:wedding the Lady Elizabeth, the eldest sister of the murdered princes, to Henry Tudor, earl of Richmond, a young exile who represented the very doubtful claim of the Beauforts to the Lancastrian heritage. Henry was the son of Margaret Beaufort, the daughter of John, first duke of Somerset, and the niece of Edmund, second duke, who fell at St Albans. All her male kinsmen had been exterminated in the Wars of the Roses. This promising scheme was to be supported by a rising of those Yorkists who rejected the usurpation of Richard III., and by the landing on the south coast of Henry of Execution Richmond with a body of Lancastrian exiles and of See also:Buck- magham. foreign mercenaries. But good organization was wanting, and chance fought for the king. A number of scattered risings in the south were put down by Richard's troops, while Buckingham, who had raised his banner in Wales, was prevented from bringing aid by a week of extraordinary rains which made the Severn impassable. Finding that the rest of the plan had miscarried, Buckingham's retainers melted away from him, and he was forced to fly. A few days later he was betrayed, handed over to the king, and beheaded (Nov. 2, 1483).

Meanwhile Richmond's little fleet was dispersed by the same storms that scattered Buckingham's army, and he was forced to return to Brittany without having landed in England. Here King Richard's luck ended. Though he called a parliament early in 1484, and made all manner of gracious promises of good governance, he felt that his position was insecure. The nation was profoundly disgusted with his unscrupulous policy, and the greater part of the leaders of the late insurrection had escaped abroad and were weaving new plots. Early in the spring he lost his only son and heir, Edward, prince of Wales, and the question of the succession to the crown was opened from a new point of view. After some hesitation Richard named his nephew John de la Pole, earl of Lincoln, a son of his sister, as his heir. But he also bethought him of another and a most repulsive plan for strengthening his position. His queen, Anne Neville, the daughter of the kingmaker, was on her death-bed. With indecent haste he began to devise a scheme for marrying his niece Elizabeth, whose brothers he had murdered but a year before. Know-ledge of this scheme is said to have shortened the life of the unfortunate Anne, and many did not scruple to say that her husband had made away with her. When the queen was dead, and some rumours of the king's intentions got abroad, the public indignation was so great that Henry of Richard's councillors had to warn him to disavow the Richmond projected marriage, if he wished to retain a single lands at adherent. He yielded, and made public complaint Milford. that he had been slandered—which few believed.

Meanwhile the conspirators of 1483 were busy in organizing another plan of invasion. This time it was successfully carried out, and the earl of Richmond landed at Milford Haven with many exiles, both Yorkists and Lancastrians, and r000 mercenaries lent him by the princess regent of France. The Welsh joined him in great numbers, not forgetting that by his Tudor descent he was their own kinsman, and when he reached Shrews-bury English adherents also began to See also:

flock in to his banner, for the whole country was seething with discontent, and Battl Bosweorth. Richard III. had but few loyal adherents. When the rivals met at See also:Bosworth Field (Aug. 22, 1485) the king's army was far the larger, but the greater part of it was deter- See also:mined not to fight. When battle was joined some left the field and many joined the pretender. Richard, however, refused to fly, and was slain, fighting to the last, along with the duke of Norfolk and a few other of his more desperate partisans. The slaughter was small, for treason, not the sword, had settled the day. The battered crown which had fallen from Richard's See also:helmet was set on the victor's head by Lord Stanley, the chief of the Yorkist peers who had joined his standard, and his army hailed him by the new title of Henry VII. No monarch of England since William the Conqueror, not excluding Stephen and Henry IV., could show such a poor title to the throne as the first of the Tudor kings. His claim to represent the house of Lancaster was of the weakest—when .Henry IV. had assented to the legitimating of his brothers the Beauforts, he had attached a clause to the act, to provide that they were given every right save that of counting in the line of succession to the throne.

The true heir to the house of John of Gaunt should have been sought among the descendants of his eldest legitimate daughter, not among those of his base-born sons. The earl of Richmond had been selected by the conspirators as their figure-head mainly because he was known as a young man of ability, and because he was unmarried and could therefore take to wife the princess Elizabeth, and so absorb the Yorkist claim in his own. This had been the essential part of the bargain, and Henry was ready to carry it out, but he insisted that he should first be recognized as king in his own right, lest it might be held that he ruled merely as his destined wife's See also:

consort. He was careful to hold his first parliament and get his title acknowledged before he married the princess. When he had done so, he had the triple claim by conquest, by election and by inheritance, safely united. Yet his position was even then insecure; the vicissitudes of the last thirty years had shaken the old prestige of the name of king, and a weaker and less capable man than Henry Tudor might have failed to retain the crown that he had won. There were plenty of possible pretenders in existence; the earl of Lincoln, whom Richard III. had recognized as his heir, was still alive; the two children of the duke of Clarence might be made the tools of conspirators; and there was a widespread doubt as to whether the sons of Edward IV. had actually died in the Tower. The secrecy with which their uncle had carried out their murder was destined to be a sore hindrance to his successor. Bosworth Field is often treated as the last act of the Wars of the Roses. This is an See also:error; they were protracted for twelve years after the accession of Henry VII., and did not really end till the time of See also:Blackheath Field and the siege of Exeter (1497). The position of the first Tudor king is misconceived if his early years are regarded as a time of strong governance and well-established order. On the contrary he was in continual danger, and was striving with all the resources of a ready and untiring mind to rebuild foundations that were absolutely rotten.

Phenomena like the Cornish revolt (which recalls Cade's insurrection) and the Yorkshire rising of 1489, which began with the 'See also:

muff"-death of the earl of Northumberland, show that at pons and plots. any moment whole counties might take arms in sheer lawlessness, or for some local grievance. Loyalty was such an uncertain thing that the king might call out great levies yet be forced to doubt whether they would fight for him—at Stoke Field it seems that a large part of Henry's army misbehaved, much as that of Richard III. had done at Bosworth. The demoralization brought about by the evil years between 1453 and 1483 could not be lived down in a day—any sort of treason was possible to the generation that had seen the career of Warwick and the usurpation of Gloucester. The survivors of that time were capable of taking arms for any cause that offered a chance of unreasonable profit, and no one's loyalty could be trusted. Did not Sir William Stanley, the best paid of those who betrayed Richard III., afterwards lose his head for a deliberate plot to betray Henry VII.? The various attempts that were made to overturn the new dynasty seem contemptible to the historian of the loth century. They were not so contemptible at the time, because England and Ireland were full Henry Early years of the reign. 524 of adventurers who were ready to back any cause, and who looked on the king of the moment as no more than a successful member of their own class—a base-born Welshman who had been lucky enough to become the figurehead of the movement that had overturned an unpopular usurper. The organizing spirits of the early troubles of the reign of Henry VII. were irreconcilable Yorkists who had suffered by the change of dynasty; but their hopes of success rested less on their own strength than on the not ill-founded notion that England would See also:tire of any ruler who had to raise taxes and reward his partisans. The position bore a curious resemblance to that of the early years of Henry IV., a king who, like Henry VII., had to vindicate a doubtful elective title to the throne by miracles of cunning and activity. The later representative of the house of Lancaster was fortunate, however, in having less formidable enemies than the earlier; the power of the baronage had been shaken by the Wars of the Roses no less than the power of the crown; so many old estates had passed rapidly from hand to hand, so many old titles were represented by upstarts destitute of local influence, that the feudal danger had become far less.

Risings like that of the Percies in 1403 were not the things which the seventh Henry had to fear. He was lucky too in having no adversary of genius of the type of Owen Glendower. Welsh national spirit indeed was enlisted on his own side. Yet leaderless seditions and the plots of obvious impostors sufficed to make his throne tremble, and a ruler less resolute, less wary, and less unscrupulous might have been overthrown. The first of the king's troubles was an abortive rising in the north See also:

riding of Yorkshire, the only district where Richard III. seems to have enjoyed personal popularity. It was led by Lord Lovel, Richard's chamberlain and See also:admiral; but the insurgents dispersed when Henry marched against them with a large force (1486), and Lovel took refuge in Flanders with Margaret of York, the widow of Charles the Bold of Burgundy, whose dower towns were the refuge of all English exiles, and whose coffers were always open to subsidize plots against her niece's husband. Under the auspices of this rancorous princess the second conspiracy was hatched in the following year (1487). Its leaders were Love] and John, earl of Lincoln, whom Richard III. had designated as his heir. But the Yorkist banner was to be raised, not in the name of Lincoln, but in that of the boy Edward of Clarence, then a prisoner in the Tower. His absence and captivity might seem a fatal hindrance, but the conspirators had prepared a " double " who was to take his name till he could be released. This was a lad named See also:Lambert See also:Simnel, the son of an Oxford See also:organ-maker, who bore a personal resemblance to the young captive. The conspirators seem to have argued that Henry VII. would not proceed to murder the real Edward, but would rather exhibit him to prove the See also:imposition; if he took the more drastic alternative Lincoln could fall back on his own claim to the crown.

In May 1487 Lincoln and Lovel landed in Ireland accompanied by other exiles and 2000 German mercenaries. The cause of York was popular in the Pale, and the Anglo-Irish barons seem to have conceived the notion that Henry VII. was likely to prove too strong and capable a king to suit their convenience. The invading army was welcomed by almost all the lords, and the See also:

spurious Clarence was crowned at Dublin by the name of Edward VI. A few weeks later Lincoln had recruited his army with 4000 or 5000 Irish adventurers under Thomas Fitzgerald, son of the earl of See also:Kildare, and had taken ship for England. He landed in Lancashire, and pushed forward, hoping to gather the English Yorkists to his aid. But few had joined him when Battle of King Henry brought him to action at Stoke, near stoke. Newark, on the 17th of July. Despite the doubtful conduct of part of the royal army, and the fierce resistance of the Germans and Irish, the rebel army was routed. Lincoln and Fitzgerald were slain; Lovel disappeared in the rout; the young impostor Simnel was taken prisoner. Henry treated him with politic contempt, and made him a See also:cook boy in his See also:kitchen. He lived for many years after in the royal house-hold. The Irish lords were pardoned on renewing them oaths[1485–1495 of fealty; the king did not wish to entangle himself in costly campaigns beyond St George's Channel till he had made his position in England more stable.

The Yorkist cause was crushed for four years, till it was raised again by Margaret of Burgundy, with an imposture even more preposterous than that of Lambert Simnel. In the intervening space, however, while Henry VII. was sHtaForeign nces. comparatively undisturbed by domestic rebellion, he found opportunity for a first tentative experiment at interfering in See also:

European politics. He allied himself with See also:Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain and with See also:Maximilian of Austria, who was ruling the Netherlands in behalf of his young son, Philip, the heir of the Burgundian inheritance, for the purpose of preventing France from annexing Brittany, the last great See also:fief of the crown which had not yet been absorbed into the Valois royal domain. This struggle, the only continental war in which the first of the Tudors risked his fortunes, was not prosecuted with any great energy, and came to a necessary end when Anne, duchess of Brittany, in whose behalf it was being waged, disappointed her allies by marrying Charles VIII. of her own freewill (Dec. 1491). Henry very wisely proceeded to get out of the war on the best terms possible, and, to the disgust of Maximilian, sold peace to the French king for 600,000 crowns, as well as an additional sum representing arrears of the pension which Louis XI. had been bound to pay to Edward IV. This treaty of Staples was, in short, a repetition of Edward's treaty geaplesof of Picquigny, equally profitable and less disgraceful, for Maximilian of Austria, whom Henry thus abandoned, had given more cause of offence than had Charles of Burgundy in 1475. Domestic malcontents did not scruple to hint that the king, like his father-in-law before him, had made war on France, not with any hope of renewing the glories of Crecy or Agincourt, still less with any design of helping his allies, but purely to get first grants from his parliament, and then a war indemnity from his enemies. In any case he was wise to make peace. France was now too strong for England, and both Maximilian and Ferdinand of Spain were selfish and shifty allies. Moreover, it was known that the one dominating desire of Charles VIII. was to conquer Italy, and it was clear that his ambitions in that direction were not likely to prove dangerous to England.

In the year of the treaty of Staples the Yorkist conspiracies began once more to thicken, and Henry was fortunate to escape with profit from the French war before his domestic Yorkist troubles recommenced. Ever since 1483 it had been plots. rumoured that one or both of the sons of Edward IV. See also:

Perkin had escaped, not having been murdered in the Tower. See also:Warbeck. Of this widespread belief the plotters now took advantage; they held that much more could be accomplished with such a claim than by using that of the unfortunate Edward of Clarence, whose chances were so severely handicapped by his being still the prisoner of Henry VII. The scheme for producing a false Plantagenet was first renewed in Ireland, where Simnel's imposture had been so easily taken up a few years before. The tool selected was one Perkin Warbeck, a handsome youth of seven-teen or eighteen, the son of a citizen of See also:Tournai, who had lived for some time in London, where Perkin had actually been born. There is a bare possibility that the young adventurer may have been an illegitimate son of Edward IV.; his likeness to the late king was much noticed. When he declared himself to be Richard of York, he obtained some support in Ireland from the earl of See also:Desmond and other lords; but he did not risk open rebellion till he had visited Flanders, and had been acknowledged as .her undoubted nephew by Duchess Margaret. Maximilian of Austria also took up his cause, as a happy means of revenging himself on Henry VII. for the treaty of Etaples. There can be small doubt that both the duchess and the German King (Maximilian had succeeded to his father's crown in 1493) were perfectly well aware that they were aiding a manifest See also:fraud. But they made much of Perkin, who followed the imperial court for two years, while his patron was intriguing with English malcontents.

The emissaries from Flanders got many promises of assistance; and a formidable rising might have taken place had Lambert Simnel. not Henry VII. been well served by his spies. But in the winter of 1494-1495 the traitors were themselves betrayed, and a large number of arrests were made, including not only Lord Fitz- waiter and a number of well-known knights of Yorkist families, but Sir William Stanley, the king's chamberlain, who had been rewarded with enormous gifts for his good service at Bosworth, and was reckoned one of the chief supports of the throne. Stanley and several others were beheaded, the rest hanged or imprisoned. This vigorous action on the part of the king seems to have cowed all Warbeck's supporters on English soil. But the pretender nevertheless sailed from Flanders in July 1495 with a following of 2000 exiles and German mercenaries. He at- tempted to land at Deal, but his vanguard was destroyed by Kentish levies, and he drew off and made for Ireland. Suspect- ing that this would be his goal, King Henry had been doing his best to strengthen his hold on the Pale, whither he had sent his capable servant Sir Edward See also:

Poynings as lord See also:deputy. Already before Warbeck's arrival Poynings had arrested the earl of Kildare, Simnel's old supporter, cowed some of the Irish by military force, and bought over others by promises of subsidies and See also:pensions. But his best-remembered achievement was that he had induced the Irish parliament to pass the ordinances known as " Poynings' Law," by which it acknowledged that it could pass no legislation which had not been approved by the king and his council, and agreed that all statutes passed by the English parliament should be in force in Ireland. That such terms could be imposed shows the strength of Poynings' See also:arm, and his vigour was equally evident when Warbeck came ashore in See also:Munster in July 1495. Few joined the impostor save the earl of Desmond, and he was repulsed from Waterford, and dared not face the army which the lord deputy put into the field against him.

Thereupon, abandoning his Irish schemes, Warbeck sailed to Scotland, whose young king James IV. had just been seduced by the emperor Maximilian into declaring war on England. He promised the Scottish king Berwick and 5o,00o crowns in return for the aid of an army. James took the offer, gave him the hand of his kinswoman Catherine See also:

Gordon, daughter of the earl of See also:Huntly, and took him forth for a raid into Northumber- land (1496). But a pretender backed by Scottish spears did not appeal to the sympathies of the English borderers. The expedition fell See also:flat; not a man joined the banner of the white rose, and James became aware that he had set forth on a See also:fool's errand. But Warbeck soon found other allies of a most un- expected sort. The heavy taxation granted by the English parliament for the Scottish war had provoked discontent and rioting in the south-western counties. In Cornwall especially the disorders grew to such a See also:pitch that local dema- rebemhon. gogues called out several thousand men to resist the rcbe/ll tax-collectors, and finally raised open rebellion, pro- posing to march on London and compel the king to dismiss his ministers. These spiritual heirs of Jack Cade were Flammock, a lawyer of See also:Bodmin, and a See also:farrier named Michael See also:Joseph. Whether they had any communication with Warbeck it is impossible to say; there is no proof of such a connexion, but their acts served him well. A Cornish. army marched straight on London, picking up some supporters in Devon and Somerset on their way, including a discontented baron, Lord See also:Audley, whom they made their captain. So precarious was the hold of Henry VII. on the throne that he was in great danger from this outbreak of mere local turbu- lence.

The rebels swept over five counties unopposed, Battle of and were only stopped and beaten in a hard fight on Black- heath. Blackheath, when they had reached the gates of London. Audley, the farrier and the lawyer were all captured and executed (June 18, 1497). But the crisis was not yet at an end. Warbeck, hearing of the rising, but not of its suppression, had left Scotland, and appeared in Devonshire in August. He rallied the wrecks of the west country rebels, and presently appeared before the gates of Exeter with nearly 8000 men. But the citizens held out against him, and presently the approach of the royal army was reported. The pretender led off his horde to meet the relieving force, but when he reached See also:

Taunton he found that his followers were so dispirited that disaster was certain. Thereupon he absconded by night, and took See also:sanctuary in the abbey of See also:Beaulieu. He offered to confess his imposture if he were promised his life, and the king accepted the terms. First at Taunton and again at Westminster, Perkin publicly recited a long narrative of his real parentage, his frauds and his adventures. He was then consigned to not over strict confinement in the Tower, and might have fared no worse than Lambert Simnel if he had possessed his soul in See also:patience.

But in the next year he corrupted his warders, broke out from his prison, and tried to escape beyond seas. He was captured, but the king again spared his life, though he was placed for the future in a dungeon " where he could see neither See also:

moon nor See also:sun." Even this did not tame the impostor's See also:mercurial temperament. In 1499 he again planned an escape, which was to be shared by another prisoner, the unfortunate Edward of Clarence, earl of Warwick, whose See also:cell was in the See also:storey above his own. But there were traitors among the Tower officials whom they suborned to help them, and the king was warned of the plot. He allowed it to proceed to the verge of execution, and then arrested both the false and the true Plantagenet. Evidence of a suspicious character was produced to Execution show that they had planned rebellion as well as mere of war- escape, and both were put to death with some of their See also:beck and accomplices. Warbeck deserved all that he reaped, Edward of but the unlucky Clarence's fate estranged many hearts Clarence. from the king. The simple and weakly young man, who had spent fifteen of his twenty-five years in confinement, had, in all See also:probability, done no more than scheme for an escape from his dungeon. But as the true male heir of the house of Plantagenet he was too dangerous to be allowed to survive. The turbulent portion of the reign of Henry VII. came to an end with Blackheath Field and the siege of Exeter. From that time forward the Tudor dynasty was no longer in Establish. serious danger; there were still some abortive plots, ment of but none that had any prospect of winning popular the Tudor support. The chances of Warbeck and Clarence had dynasty.. vanished long before they went to the scaffold.

The Yorkist claim, after Clarence's death, might be supposed to have passed to his cousin Edmund, earl of Suffolk, the younger brother of that John, earl of Lincoln, who had been declared heir to the crown by Richard III., and had fallen at Stoke field. Fully conscious of the danger of his position, Suffolk fled to the continent, and lived for many years as a pensioner of the emperor Maximilian. Apparently he dabbled in treason; it is at any rate certain that in 1501 King Henry executed some, and imprisoned others, of his relatives and retainers. But his plots, such as they were, seem to have been futile. There was no substratum of popular discontent left in England on which a dangerous insurrection might be built up. It was to be forty years before another outbreak of turbulence against the crown was to break forth. VI.

End of Article: CONQUEST

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
CONON
[next]
CONRAD (d. 955)