Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
ACTION , in See also:law, a See also:term used by jurists in three different senses: (1) a right to See also:institute proceedings in a See also:court of See also:justice to obtain redress for a wrong (actio nihil aliud est quam See also:jus prosegnndi in judicio quod alicui debelur, See also:Bracton, de Legibus Angliae, bk. iii. ch. i., f. 98 b); (2) the proceeding itself (action ?z'est auter See also:chose que loyall demande de son See also:droit, Co. Litt. 285 (a)); (3) the particular See also:form of the proceeding. The term is derived from the See also:Roman law (actio), in which it is used in all three senses. In the See also:history of Roman law, actions passed through three stages. The first See also:period (terminated about 270 B.C. by the Lex Aebutia) is known as the See also:system of legis actiones, and was based on the precepts of the XII. tables and used before the See also:praetor urbanus. These actiones were five in nuniber—sacramenti, per judicis postulationem, per condictionem, per See also:manes injectionem, per pignoris captionem. The first was the See also:primitive and characteristic action of the Roman law, and the others were little more than modes of applying it to cases not contemplated in the See also:original form, or of carrying the result of it into See also:execution when the action had been decided. The legis actiones were superseded by the formulae,originated by the praetor peregrines for the determination of controversies between foreigners, but found more flexible than the earlier system and made available for citizens by the Lex Aebutia. Under both these systems the praetor referred the See also:matter in dispute to an arbiter (judex), but in the later he settled the See also:formula (i.e. the issues to be referred and the appropriate form of See also:relief) before making the See also:order of reference. In the third See also:stage, the formulary stage See also:fell into disuse, and after A.D. 342 the See also:magistrate himself or his See also:deputy decided the controversy after the defending party had been duly summoned by a libellus. The classifications of actiones in Roman law were very numerous. The See also:division which is still most universally recognized is that of actions in rem and actions in personam (Sohm, Roman Law, tr. by Ledlie, 2nd ed. 277). An action in rem asserts a right to a particular thing against all the See also:world. An action in personam asserts a right only against a particular See also:person. Perhaps the best See also:modern example of the distinction is that made in maritime cases between an action against a See also:ship after a collision at See also:sea, and an action against the owners of the ship. In See also:English law the term " action " at a very See also:early date became associated with See also:civil proceedings in the Court of See also:Common Pleas, which were distinguished from pleas of the See also:crown, such as indictments or informations and for suits in the Court of See also:Chancery or in the See also:Admiralty or ecclesiastical courts. The English action was a proceeding commenced by See also:writ original at the common law. The remedy was of right and not of See also:grace. The history of actions is the history of civil See also:procedure in the courts of common law. As a result of the reform of civil procedure by the Judicature Acts the term " action " in English law now means at the High Court of Justice " a civil proceeding commenced by writ of See also:summons or in such other manner as may be prescribed by rules of court " (e.g. by originating summons). The proceeding thus commenced ends by See also:judgment and execution. This See also:definition includes proceedings under the Chancery, Admiralty and See also:Probate See also:jurisdiction of the High Court, but excludes proceedings commenced by See also:petition, such as See also:divorce suits and See also:bankruptcy and winding-up matters, as well as criminal proceedings in the High Court or applications for the issue of the writs of See also:mandamus, See also:prohibition, habeas corpus or certiorari. The Judicature Acts and Rules have had the effect of abolishing all the forms of " action " used at the common law and of creating one common form of legal proceeding for all See also:ordinary controversies between subjects in whatever division of the High Court. The stages in an English action are the writ, by which the persons against whom relief is claimed are summoned before the court; the pleadings and interlocutory steps, by which the issues between the parties are adjusted; the trial, at which the issues of fact and law involved are brought before the tribunal; the judgment, by which the relief sought is granted or refused; and execution, by which the law gives to the successful party the fruits of the judgment. The procedure varies according as the action is in the High Court, a See also:county court or one of the other See also:local courts of See also:record which still survive; but there is no substantial difference in the incidents of trial, judgment and execution in any of these courts. The initial difference between actions in the High Court and the county court is that the latter are commenced by plaint lodged in the court, on which a summons is prepared by the court and served by its See also:bailiff, whereas in the High Court the party pre-pares the writ and lodges it in court for sealing, and when it is sealed, himself effects the service. An action is said to " See also:lie " when the law provides a remedy for some particular See also:act or omission by a subject which infringes the legal rights of another subject. An act of such a See also:character is said to give a " cause of action." In the action the person who alleges himself aggrieved claims a judgment of the court in his favour giving an adequate and appropriate remedy for the injury or damage which he has sustained by the infraction of his rights. As to the See also:time within which an action must be brought, see See also:LIMITATION, STATUTES OF. When the rights of a subject are in-fringed by the illegal action of the See also:state, an action lies in See also:England against the See also:officers who have done the wrong, unless the claim be one arising out of See also:breach of a See also:contract with the state, or out of an " Act of State." For a breach by the state of a contract made between the state and a subject the remedy of the subject is, as a See also:general See also:rule, not by action against the agents of the state who acted for the state with reference to the making or breach of the contract, but against the Crown itself by the proceeding called Petition of Right (see PETITION). While as a generic term " action " in its proper legal sense includes suits by the Crown and " criminal actions " (see Co. Litt. 284b; Bracton, de Legibus Angliae, bk. iii. ch. v. f. Io46; Brad-laugh v. See also: Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] ACTINOZOA |
[next] ACTIUM (mod. Punta) |