Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:SECRET (See also:Lat. secretum, hidden, concealed) , that which is concealed from See also:general knowledge. In See also:special senses the word is applied to (a) a See also:prayer in the See also:Roman and other liturgies, said during See also:mass by the See also:priest in so See also:low a See also:voice that it does not reach the See also:congregation, and (b) a covering or See also:skull-cap made of See also:steel
fitting See also:close to the See also:head.
In See also:law, the question of secrecy is an important one. Generally,
See also:English law does not require a See also:solicitor or See also:barrister to disclose secrets entrusted to them by a client, and the same probably holds See also:good in the See also:case of medical men. In the case of ministers of See also:religion, it has never been definitely settled how far they can be compelled to disclose in See also:evidence what has been confided in the secrecy of the See also:confessional. But according to the 113th See also:Canon, a priest of the See also: Its officials See also:work in secret, and certain sums of See also:money are placed at the disposal of the head of the department, and expended as he may think See also:fit, without having to render any specific See also:account of them. Various departments of governments have also their own departmental secret service, for the better guarding against frauds, such as in the See also:United States, the See also:Treasury Department and the See also:Post See also:Office.
The various See also:European codes generally have dealt with breach of secrecy, e.g. s. 300 of the See also:German Penal See also:Code imposes a See also:fine up to 1500 marks and imprisonment up to three months on doctors, attorneys and other professional persons who reveal a secret entrusted to them in their professional capacity. For this offence also the See also:French code, See also:art. 378, imposes imprisonment of from one to six months and a fine of from too to Soo francs.
See Brouardel, Le Secret medical (See also:Paris, 1893) ; Hallays, Le Secret professionnel (Paris, 1890).
SECR$TAN, See also: The See also:object of his See also:writing was to build up a rational, philosophical religion, to reconcile the ultimate bases of See also:Christianity with the principles of metaphysical philosophy. For a detailed examination of his philosophy, see Pillon, La Philosophic de CharlesSecretan. SECRETARY-See also:BIRD, a very singular See also:African bird, first accurately made known, from an example living in the See also:menagerie of the See also:prince of See also:Orange, in 1769 by A. See also:Vosmaer 1 in a See also:treatise published simultaneously in Dutch and French, and afterwards included in his collected works issued, under the See also:title of Regnum Animale, in 1804. He was told that at the Cape of Good See also:Hope this bird was known as the " See also:Sagittarius " or See also:Archer, from its striding gait being thought to resemble that of a bowman advancing to shoot, but that this name had been corrupted into that of " Secretarius." In See also:August 177o G. See also:Edwards §aw an example Secretary-Bird. (apparently alive, and the survivor of a pair which had been brought to England) in the See also:possession of a Mr See also:Raymond near See also:Ilford in See also:Essex; and, being unacquainted with Vosmaer's wprlt, he figured and described it as "of a new genus" in the Philosophical Transactions for the following See also:year (lxi. pp. 55, 56, p1,ii.). In 1776 P. Sonnerat (Voy. Nouv. Guinee, p. 87, pl. 5o) again described and figured; but not at all correctly, the See also:species, saying (but no doubt wrongly) that he found it in 1771 in the Philippine Islands. A better See also:representation was given by D'Aubenton in Le Vaillant (Sec. Voy. Afrique, ii. p. 273) truly states that Kolben in 1719 (Caput Bonae Spei hodiernsum, p. 182, French version, ii. p. 198) had mentioned this bird under its See also:local name of " Snake-eater ' (Slangenvreeter, Dutch See also:translation, i. p. 214) ; but that author, who was a See also:bad naturalist, thought it was a See also:Pelican and also confounded it with the See also:Spoonbill, which is figured to illustrate his account of it. the See also:Plan„ hes enluminies (721); in 178o See also:Buffon (Oiseaux, vii. p. 330) published some additional information derived from Querhoent, saying also that it was to be seen in some English menageries; and the following year J. Latham (Synopsis, i. p. 20, pl. 2) described and figured it from three examples which he had seen alive in England. None of these authors, however, gave the bird a scientific name, and the first conferred upon it seems to have been that of Falco See also:serpentarius, inscribed on a See also:plate bearing date 1779, by See also: It seems to possess a See also:strange partiality for the destruction of snakes, and successfully attacks the most venomous species, striking them with its knobbed wings and kicking forwards at them with its feet, until they are rendered incapable of offence, when it swallows them. The See also:nest is a huge structure, placed in a See also:bush or See also:tree, and in it two white eggs, spotted with See also:rust-colour, are laid. The young remain in the nest for a long while, and even when four months old are unable to stand upright. They are very frequently brought up tame. The Secretary-bird is found, but not very abundantly and only in some localities, over the greater part of See also:Africa, especially in the See also:south, extending northwards on the See also:west to the See also:Gambia and in the interior to See also:Khartum. The systematic position of the genus Serpentarius has long been a See also:matter of discussion, and is still one of much See also:interest, though of See also:late classifiers have been See also:pretty well agreed 4n placing it in the See also:order Accipitres. Most of them, however, have shown great want of See also:perception by putting it in the See also:family Falconidae. No anatomist can doubt its forming a See also:peculiar family, Serpentariidae, differing more from the Falconidae than do the Vulturidae; and the fact of A. Milne-Edwards having recognized in the See also:Miocene of the See also:Allier the fossil See also:bone of a species of this genus, S. robustus (Otis. See also:foss. See also:France, ii. pp. 465-468, pl. 186, See also:figs. 1-6), proves that it is an See also:ancient See also:form, one possibly carrying on a See also:direct and not much modified descent from a generalized form, whence may have sprung not only the Falconidae but perhaps the progenitors of the Ardeidae and Ciconiidae, as well as the puzzling Cariamidae (See also:Seriema, q.v.). (A. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] SECOND SIGHT |
[next] SECRETARY OF STATE |