Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

STEPHEN (1097?-1154)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V25, Page 882 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

STEPHEN (1097?-1154) , See also:king of See also:England, was the third son of Stephen See also:Henry, See also:count of See also:Blois and See also:Chartres, and, throughhis See also:mother Adela, a See also:grandson of See also:William the Conqueror. See also:Born some See also:time before 1lot, he was still a boy when he was taken into favour by his See also:uncle, Henry I. of England. From Henry he received the See also:honour of See also:knighthood and the See also:county of See also:Mortain. In 1118 he severed his connexion with Blois and Chartres, renouncing his hereditary claims in favour of his See also:elder See also:brother See also:Theobald. But he acquired the county of See also:Boulogne by marrying See also:Matilda (c. 1103-1152), the heiress of Count Eustace III. and a niece of Henry's first wife. The old king arranged this match after the untimely loss of his son, William Atheling, in the tragedy of the See also:White See also:Ship; until 1125 Stephen was regarded as the probable See also:heir to the See also:English See also:throne. But the return of the widowed empress Matilda (q.v.) to her See also:father's See also:court changed the situation. Henry compelled Stephen and the See also:rest of his barons to acknowledge the empress as their future ruler (1126). Seven years later these oaths were renewed; and in addition the ultimate claims of Matilda's See also:infant son, Henry of See also:Anjou, were recognized (1133). But the See also:death of Henry I. found the empress absent from England. Stephen seized the opportunity.

He hurried across the Channel and began to See also:

canvass for supporters, arguing that his oaths to Matilda were taken under See also:coercion, and that she, as the daughter of a professed See also:nun, was illegitimate. He was raised to the throne by the Londoners, the See also:official baronage and the See also:clergy; his most influential supporters were the old See also:justiciar, See also:Robert, See also:bishop of See also:Salisbury, and his own brother Henry, bishop of See also:Winchester. See also:Innocent II. was induced by Bishop Henry to ratify the See also:election, and Stephen thus cleared himself from the stain of See also:perjury. Two charters of liberties, issued in rapid See also:succession, confirmed the King's See also:alliance with the See also:Church and earned the See also:good will of the nation. But his supporters traded upon his notorious facility and the unstable nature of his See also:power. Extortionate concessions were demanded by the See also:great barons, and particularly by See also:Earl Robert of See also:Gloucester, the See also:half-brother of the empress. The clergy insisted that neither their goods nor their persons should be subject to See also:secular See also:jurisdiction. Stephen endeavoured to See also:free himself from the See also:control of such interested supporters by creating a See also:mercenary See also:army and a royalist party. This led at once to a rupture between himself and Earl Robert (1138), which was the See also:signal for sporadic rebellions. Soon afterwards the king attacked the bishops of Salisbury, See also:Ely and See also:Lincoln—a powerful See also:family clique who stood at the, See also:head of the official baronage—and, not content with seizing their castles, subjected them to See also:personal See also:outrage and detention. The result was that the clergy, headed by his brother, the bishop of Winchester, declared against him (1139). In the midst of these difficulties he had See also:left the western See also:marches at the See also:mercy of the Welsh, and the See also:defence of the See also:northern shires against See also:David of See also:Scotland had devolved upon the barons of See also:Yorkshire.

Stephen was thoroughly discredited when the empress at length appeared in England (See also:

Sept. 30, 1139). Through a misplaced sense of See also:chivalry he declined to take an opportunity of seizing her See also:person. She was therefore able to join her half-brother at Gloucester, to obtain recognition in the western and See also:south-western shires, and to contest the royal See also:title for eight years. Stephen's initial errors were aggravated by See also:bad See also:general-ship. He showed remarkable See also:energy in hurrying from one centre of See also:rebellion to another; but he never ventured to attack the headquarters of the empress. In 1141 he was surprised and captured while besieging Lincoln See also:Castle. The empress in consequence reigned for six months as "See also:Lady (Domino) of the English"; See also:save for her faults of See also:temper the cause of Stephen would never have been retrieved. But, later in the See also:year, his supporters were able to procure his See also:release in See also:exchange for the earl of Gloucester. After an obstinate See also:siege he expelled Matilda from See also:Oxford (Dec. 1142) and compelled her to fall back upon the See also:west. The next five years witnessed anarchy such as England had never before experienced.

England See also:

north of the Ribble and the See also:Tyne had passed into the hands c f David of Scotland and his son, See also:Prince Henry; Ranulf earl of See also:Chester was constructing an See also:independent principality; on the west the raids of the Angevin party, in the See also:east and midlands the excesses of such rebels as See also:Geoffrey de See also:Mandeville, earl of See also:Essex, turned considerable districts into wildernesses. Meanwhile Geoffrey of Anjou, the See also:husband of the empress, completed the See also:conquest of See also:Normandy (1144). In 1147 the situation improved for Stephen; Robert of Gloucester, the ablest of the Angevin partisans, died, and the empress left England in despair. But her son soon appeared in England to renew the struggle (1149) and conciliate new supporters. Soon after his return to Normandy Henry was invested by his father with the duchy (1150). He succeeded to Anjou in 1151; next year he acquired the duchy of See also:Aquitaine by See also:marriage. Stephen struggled hard to secure the succession for Eustace, his elder son. But he had quarrelled with See also:Rome respecting a vacancy in the see of See also:York; the See also:pope forbade the English bishops to consecrate Eustace (1151) ; and there was a general unwillingness to prolong the See also:civil See also:war. Worn out by incessant conflicts, the king bowed to the inevitable when Henry next appeared in England (1153). Negotiations were opened; and Stephen's last hesitations disappeared when Eustace was carried off by a sudden illness. See also:Late in 1153 the king acknowledged Henry as his heir, only stipulating that the earldom of See also:Surrey and his private estates should be guaranteed to his surviving son, William: The king and the See also:duke agreed to co-operate for the repression of anarchy; but Stephen died before this See also:work was more than begun (Oct. 1154).

On his great See also:

seal Stephen is represented as tall and robust, bearded, and of an open countenance. He was See also:frank and generous; his occasional acts of duplicity were planned reluctantly and never carried to their logical conclusion. High spirited and proud of his dignity, he lived to repent, without being able to undo, the ruinous concessions by which he had See also:con-ciliated supporters. In warfare he showed courage, but little generalship; as a statesman he failed in his dealings with the Church, which he alternately humoured and thwarted. He was a generous See also:patron of religious See also:foundations; and some pleasing anecdotes suggest that his personal See also:character deserves more See also:commendation than his See also:record as a king. See the Gesta See also:Stephan, See also:Richard of See also:Hexham, "Eked of Rievaux' Relatio de Standardo, and the See also:chronicle of Robert de Torigni, all in R. Howlett's See also:Chronicles of the Reins of Stephen, &c. (4 vols., See also:London, 1884—1889) ; Ordenc Vitalis s Historia ecclesiastica, ed. Le See also:Prevost (5 vols., See also:Paris, 1838—1855) ; William of See also:Malmesbury's Historia novella, ed. W. See also:Stubbs (London, 1889) ; See also:John of See also:Worcester's Continuation of See also:Florence, ed. J.

H. See also:

Weaver (Oxford, 19o8); the See also:Peterborough Chronicle, ed. C. Plummer (1892—1899). Of See also:modern See also:works see See also:Miss K. Norgate's England under the Angevin See also:Kings, vol. i. (London, 1887) ; O. RSssler's Kaiserin Mathilde (See also:Berlin, 1897) ; J. H. See also:Round's Geoffrey de Mandeville (London, 1892) ; H. W. C. avis's " The Anarchy of Stephen's Reign" in Eng.

Hist. See also:

Review for 1903. (H. W. C.

End of Article: STEPHEN (1097?-1154)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
STEPHEN
[next]
STEPHEN (ISTVAN) BATHORY (1533-1586)