Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:ANSELM (c. 1033-1109) , See also:archbishop of See also:Canterbury, was See also:born at See also:Aosta in See also:Piedmont. His See also:family was accounted See also:noble, and was possessed of considerable See also:property. Gundulph, his See also:father, was by See also:birth a Lombard, and seems to have been a See also:man of harsh and violent See also:temper; his See also:mother, Ermenberga, was a prudent and virtuous woman, from whose careful religious training the See also:young Anselm derived much benefit. At the See also:age of fifteen he desired to enter a See also:convent, but he could not obtain his father's consent. Disappointment brought on an illness, on his recovery from which he seems for a See also:time to have given up his studies, and to have plunged into the See also:gay See also:life of the See also:world. During this time his mother died, and his father's harshness became unbearable. He See also:left See also:home, and with only one attendant crossed the See also:Alps, and wandered through See also:Burgundy and See also:France. Attracted by the fame of his countryman, See also:Lanfranc, then See also:prior of Bec, he entered See also:Normandy, and, after spending some time at See also:Avranches, settled at the monastery of Bec. There, at the age of twenty-seven, he became a See also: It was during these quiet years at Bec that Anselm wrote his first philosophical and religious See also:works, the dialogues on Truth and Freewill, and the two celebrated See also:treatises, the Monologion and Proslogion.
Meanwhile the convent had been growing in See also:wealth, as well as in reputation, and had acquired considerable property in See also:England, which it became the See also:duty of Anselm occasionally to visit. By his mildness of temper and unswerving rectitude, he so endeared himself to the See also:English that he was looked upon and desired as the natural successor to Lanfranc, then archbishop of Canterbury. But on the death of that great man, the ruling See also:sovereign, See also: Anselm, accordingly, intelligere ut credam, sed credo ut intelligam. Nam et hoc credo, insisted that he must proceed to See also:Rome to receive the See also:pall. But quia, nisi credidero, non intelligam." (" Nor do I seek to under-William would not permit this; he had not acknowledged Urban, stand that I may believe, but I believe that I may understand. and he maintained his right to prevent any pope being acknow- For this too I believe, that unless I first believe, I shall not underledged by an English subject without his permission. A great I stand.") But after the faith is held fast, the See also:attempt must be See also:council of churchmen and nobles, held to See also:settle the See also:matter, ; made to demonstrate by See also:reason the truth of what we believe. It is wrong not to do so. "Negligentiae mihi esse videtur, si, postquam confirmati sumus in fide, non studemus quad credimus, intelligere." ("I hold it to be a failure in duty if after we have become steadfast in the faith we do not strive to understand what we believe.") To such an extent does he carry this demand for rational explanation that, at times, it seems as if he claimed for unassisted intelligence the See also:power of penetrating even to the mysteries of the See also:Christian faith. On the whole, however, the qualified statement is his real view; merely rational proofs are always, he affirms, to be tested by Scripture. (Cur See also:Deus homo, i. 2 and 38; De Fide Trin. 2.) The groundwork of his theory of knowledge is contained in the See also:tract De Veritate, in which, from the See also:consideration of truth as in knowledge, in willing, and in things, he rises to the See also:affirmation of an See also:absolute truth, in which all other truth participates. This absolute truth is See also:God himself, who is therefore the ultimate ground or principle both of things and of thought. The notion of God comes thus into the foreground of the See also:system; before all things it is necessary that it should be made clear to reason, that it should be demonstrated to have real existence. This demonstration is the substance of the Monologion and Proslogion. In the first of these the See also:proof rests on the See also:ordinary grounds of See also:realism, and coincides to some extent with the earlier theory of See also:Augustine, though it is carried out with singular boldness and fulness. Things, he says, are called See also:good in a variety of ways and degrees; this would be impossible if there were not some absolute See also:standard, some good in itself, in which all relative goods participate. Similarly with such predicates as great, just; they involve a certain greatness and See also:justice. The very existence of things is impossible without some one Being, by whom they are. This absolute Being, this goodness, justice, greatness, is God. Anselm was not thoroughly satisfied with this reasoning; it started from a posteriori grounds, and contained several converging lines of proof. He desired to have some one See also:short demonstration. Such a demonstration he presented in the Proslogion; it is his celebrated ontological proof. God is that being than whom none greater can conceived. Now, if that than which nothing greater cgtn Y1e conceived existed only in the See also:intellect, it would not be the absolutely greatest, for we could add to it existence in reality. It follows, then, that the being than whom nothing greater can be conceived, i.e. God, necessarily has real existence. This reasoning, in which Anselm partially anticipated the Cartesian philosophers, has rarely seemed satisfactory. It was opposed at the time by the monk Gaunilo, in his Lifter See also:pro Insipiente, on the ground that we cannot pass from See also:idea to reality. The same See also:criticism is made by several of the later schoolmen, among others by See also:Aquinas, and is in substance what See also:Kant advances against all ontological proof. Anselm replied to the objections of Gaunilo in his Lifter Apologeticus. The existence of God being thus held proved, he proceeds to See also:state the rational grounds of the Christian doctrines of creation and of the Trinity. With reference to this last, he says we cannot know God from himself, but only after the See also:analogy of his creatures; and the See also:special analogy used is the self-consciousness of man, its See also:peculiar See also:double nature, with the necessary elements, memory and intelligence, representing the relation of the Father to the Son. The mutual love of these two, proceeding from the relation they hold to one another, symbolizes the See also:Holy Spirit. The further theological doctrines of man, See also:original sin, See also:free will, are See also:developed, partly in the Monologion, partly in other mixed treatises. Finally, in his greatest See also:work, Cur Deus homo, he undertakes to make See also:plain, even to infidels, the rational See also:necessity of the Christian See also:mystery of the atonement. The theory rests on three positions: that See also:satisfaction is necessary on See also:account of God's See also:honour and justice; that such satisfaction can be given only by the peculiar See also:personality advised Anselm to submit to the king, but failed to overcome his mild and patient firmness. The matter was postponed, and William meanwhile privately sent messengers to Rome, who acknowledged Urban and prevailed on him to send a See also:legate to the king bearing the archiepiscopal pall. A partial reconciliation was then effected, and the matter of the pall was compromised. It was not given by the king, but was laid on the See also:altar at Canterbury, whence Anselm took it.
Little more than a year after, fresh trouble arose with the king, and Anselm resolved to proceed to Rome and seek the counsel of his spiritual father. With great difficulty he obtained a reluctant permission to leave, and in See also:October to97 he set out for Rome. William immediately seized on the revenues of the see, and retained them to his death. Anselm was received with high honour by Urban, and at a great council held at See also:Bari, he was put forward to defend the See also:doctrine of the procession of the Holy See also:Ghost against the representatives of the See also:Greek Church. But Urban was too politic to embroil himself with the king of England, and Anselm found that he could obtain no substantial result. He withdrew from Rome, and spent some time at the little See also:village of Schiavi, where he finished his See also:treatise on the atonement, Cur Deus homo, and then retired to See also:Lyons.
In 1 Too William was killed, and See also: The See also:answer of the pope reaffirmed the See also:law as to investiture. A second See also:embassy was sent, with a similar result. Henry, however, remained See also:firm, and at last, in 1103, Anselm and an See also:envoy from the king set out for Rome. The pope, See also:Paschal, reaffirmed strongly the rule of investiture, and passed See also:sentence of See also:excommunication against all who had infringed the law, except Henry. Practically this left matters as they were, and Anselm, who had received a See also:message forbidding him to return to England unless on the king's terms, withdrew to Lyons, where he waited to see if Paschal would not take stronger See also:measures. At last, in 1105, he resolved himself to excommunicate Henry. His intention was made known to the king through his See also:sister, and it seriously alarmed him, for it was a See also:critical See also:period in his affairs. A See also:meeting was arranged, and a reconciliation between them effected. In 1106 Anselm crossed to England, with power from the pope to remove the sentence of excommunication from the illegally invested churchmen. In 1107 the See also:long dispute as to investiture was finally ended by the king resigning his formal rights. The remaining two years of Anselm's life were spent in the duties of his archbishopric. He died on the 21st of See also:April 'too. He was canonized in 1494 by See also: Now this God-man, as sinless, is exempt from the See also:punishment of sin; His See also:passion is therefore voluntary, not given as due. The merit of it is therefore infinite; God's justice is thus appeased, and His See also:mercy may extend to man. This theory has exercised immense influence on the form of church doctrine. It is certainly an advance on the older patristic theory, in so far as it substitutes for a contest between God and Satan, a contest between the goodness and justice of God; but it puts the whole relation on a merely legal footing, gives it no ethical bearing, and neglects altogether the consciousness of the individual to be redeemed. In this respect it contrasts unfavourably with the later theory of See also:Abelard. Anselm's speculations did not receive, in the See also:middle ages, the respect and See also:attention justly their due. This was probably due to their unsystematic character, for they are generally tracts or dialogues on detached questions, not elaborate treatises like the great works of See also:Albert, Aquinas, and Erigena. They have, however, a freshness and philosophical vigour, which more than makes up for their want of system, and which raises them far above the level of most scholastic writings. Works: The best edition of St Anselm's See also:complete works is that of Dom See also:Gerberon (See also:Paris, 1675); reprinted with many notes in 1712; incorporated by J. See also:Migne in his Patrologia See also:Latina, tomi clviii.-clix. (Paris. 1853–1854). Migne's reprint contains many errors. The Cur Deus home may be best studied in the See also:editions published by.D. Nutt (See also:London, 1885) and by See also:Griffith (1898). The Mariale, or poems in honour of the Blessed Virgin, has been carefully edited by P. Ragey (See also:Tournai, 1885) ; the Monologion and Proslogion, by C. E. Ubaghs (See also:Louvain, 1854; Eng. trans. by S. N. See also:Deane, See also:Chicago, 1903); the Meditationes, many of which are wrongly attributed to Anselm, have been frequently reprinted, and were included in See also:Methuen's Library of Devotion (London, 1903). The best criticism of Anselm's philosophical works is by J. M. See also:Rigg (London, 1896), and Domet de Vorges (Grands Philosoghes See also:series, Paris, 1901). For a complete bibliography, see A. Vacant's Dictionnaire de theologie. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] ANSELM |
[next] ANSELME (Father Anselme of the Virgin Mary) (1625-1... |