Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:EPHTHALITES, or See also: Our earliest See also:information about the Ephthalites comes from the Chinese See also:chronicles, in which it is stated that they were originally a tribe of the See also:great Yue-Chi (q.v.), living to the See also:north of the Great See also:Wall, and in subjection to the Jwen-Jwen, as were also the See also:Turks at one See also:time. Their original name was Hoa or Hoa-See also:tun; subsequently they styled themselves Ye-tha-i-li-to after the name of their royal See also:family, or more briefly Ye-tha. Before the 5th See also:century A.D. they began to move westwards, for about 420 we find them in Transoxiana, and for the next 130 years they were a menace to Persia, which they continually and successfully invaded, though they never held it as a See also:conquest. The See also:Sassanid See also: 510–54o) made Sakala in the See also:Punjab his'See also:Indian See also:capital, but the See also:cruelty of his See also:rule provoked the Indian princes to See also:form a See also:confederation and revolt against him about 528. He was not, however, killed, but took refuge in See also:Kashmir, where after a few years he seized the throne and then attacked the neighbouring See also:kingdom of Gandhara, perpetrating terrible massacres. About a See also:year after this he died (c. 540), and shortly afterwards the Ephthalites collapsed under the attacks of the Turks. They do not appear to have mpved on to another See also:sphere, as these nomadic tribes often did when defeated, and were probably gradually absorbed in the surrounding populations. Their See also:political power perhaps continued in the Gurjara See also:empire, which at one time extended to See also:Bengal in the east and the See also:Nerbudda in the south, and continued in a diminished form until A.D. 1040. These Gurjaras appear to have entered India in connexion with the Hunnish invasions.
Our knowledge of the Indian Hunas is chiefly derived from coins, from a few See also:inscriptions distributed from the Punjab to central India, and from the See also:account of the Chinese See also:pilgrim Hsuan Tsang, who visited the See also:country just a century after the See also:death of Mihiragula. The See also:Greek See also: They are represented as delighting in massacres and See also:torture, and it is said that popular tradition in India still retains the See also:story that Mihiragula used to amuse himself by See also:rolling elephants down a precipice and watching their agonies. Their invasions shook Indian society and institutions to the See also:foundations, but, unlike the earlier Kushans, they do not seem to have introduced new ideas into India or have acted as other than a destructive force, although they may perhapshave kept up some communication between India and Persia. The first part of Mihiragula seems to be the name of the Persian deity Mithra, but his See also:patron deity was See also:Siva, and he See also:left behind him the reputation of a ferocious persecutor of See also:Buddhism. Many of his coins See also:bear the See also:Nandi See also:bull (Siva's See also:emblem), and the king's name is preceded by the See also:title See also:saki (shah), which had previously been used by the Kushan See also:dynasty. Toramana's coins are found plentifully in Kashmir, which, therefore, probably formed part of the Rana dominions before Mihiragula's time, so that when he fled there after his defeat he was taking refuge, if not with his own subjects, at least with a kindred See also:clan. Greek writers give a more flattering account of the Ephthalites, which may perhaps be due to the fact that they were useful to the East See also:Roman empire as enemies of Persia and also not dangerously near. See also:Procopius says that they were far more civilized than the Huns of See also:Attila, and the See also:Turkish See also:ambassador who was received by See also:Justin is said to have described them as acrrucoi, which may merely mean that they lived in the cities which they conquered. The Chinese writers say that their customs were like those of the Turks; that they had no cities, lived in See also:felt tents, were ignorant of See also:writing and practised See also:polyandry. Nothing whatever is known of their See also:language, but some scholars explain the names Toramana and Jauvla as Turkish. For the possible connexion between the Ephthalites and the See also:European Huns see Hums. The Chinese statement that the Hoa or Ye-tha were a See also:section of the great Yue-Chi, and that their customs resembled those of the Turks (Tu-Kiue), is probably correct, but does not amount to much, for the relationship did not prevent them from fighting with the Yue-Chi and Turks, and means little more than that they belonged to the warlike and energetic section of central Asian nomads, which is in any See also:case certain. They appear to have been more ferocious and less assimilative than the other conquering tribes. This may, how-ever, be due to the fact that their contact with See also:civilization was so See also:short; the Yue-Chi .and Turks had had some See also:commerce with more advanced races before they played any part in political history, but the Ephthalites appear as raw barbarians, and were annihilated as a nation in little more than a See also:hundred years. Like the Yue-Chi they have probably contributed to form some of the See also:physical types of the Indian See also:population, and it is noticeable that polyandry is a recognized institution among many Himalayan tribes, and is also said to be practised secretly by the See also:Jats and other races of the plains.
Among original authorities may be consulted Procopius, See also:Menander See also:Protector, Cosmas Indicopleustes (trans. McCrindle, See also:Hakluyt Society, 1897), the Kashmir See also:chronicle Rajatarangini (trans. See also:Stein, 1900, and Yuan Chwang). See also A. Stein, White Huns and Kindred Tribes (1905); O. Franke, Beitrage aus chinesischen Quellen sur Kenntnis der Tiirkvolker and Skythen (1904); Ujfalvy, Memoire sur See also:les Huns Blancs (1898) ; Drouin, Memoire sur les Huns Ephthalites (1895) ; and various articles by See also:Vincent See also: Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] EPHRAIM |
[next] EPIC POETRY |