Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
BAMIAN , a once renowned See also:city of See also:Afghanistan, situated about 8o m. N.W. of See also:Kabul. Its remains See also:lie in a valley of the See also:Hazara See also:country, on the See also:chief road from Kabul towards See also:Turkestan, and immediately at the See also:northern See also:foot of that prolongation of the See also:Indian See also:Caucasus now called Koh-i-Baba. The passes on the Kabul See also:side are not less than 11,00o and 12,000 ft. in See also:absolute height, and those immediately to the See also:north but little inferior. The height of the valley was fixed at about 85oo ft., and the surrounding country carefully surveyed by See also:Major See also:Pelham J. See also:Maitland and the Hon. M. G. See also:Talbot, during the progress of the Russo-Afghan Boundary See also:Commission in See also:November 1885. The See also:river draining the valley is one of the chief See also:sources of the Sarkhab (Surkhab) or Aksarai, an important tributary of the Upper See also:Oxus. The prominences of the cliffs which See also:line the valley are crowned by the remains of numerous massive towers, whilst their precipitous faces are for 6 or 7 M. pierced by an infinity of See also:ancient See also:cave-dwellings, some of which are still occupied. The actual site of the old city is marked by mounds and remains of walls, and on an isolated See also:rock in the See also:middle of the valley are consider-able ruins of what appears to have been the See also:acropolis, now known to the See also:people as Ghulgulah. But the most famous remains at Bamian are two See also:colossal See also:standing idols, carved in the cliffs on the north side of the valley. They are 113 ft. and 120 ft. high respectively. These images, which have been much injured, apparently by See also:cannon-shot, are cut in niches in the rock, and both images and niches have been coated with See also:stucco. There is an inscription, not yet interpreted, over the greater idol, and on each side of its See also:niche are staircases leading to a chamber near the See also:head, which shows traces of elaborate ornamentation in See also:azure and See also:gilding. These See also:chambers are used by the See also:amir as See also:store-houses for See also:grain. The See also:surface of the niches also has been painted with figures. In one of the See also:branch valleys is a similar See also:colossus, some-what inferior in See also:size to the second of these two; and there are indications of other niches and idols. Chahilburj, 28 m. from Zari, on the road to See also:Balkh by the Balkhab, at the See also:east end of the Sokhtagi valley; Shahr-i-Babar, about 45 M. above Chahilburj; and Gawargin, 6 m. above Shahr-i-Babar, are all fortified sites of about the same See also:age as the See also:relics at Bamian. At See also:Haibak there is a very perfect excavation called the Takht-i-Rustam (a See also:general name for all incomprehensible constructions amongst the See also:modern inhabitants of Afghan Turkestan), which consists of an See also:annular ditch enclosing a See also:platform, with a small See also:house about 21 ft. square above it, all cut out of the solid rock. There are hundreds of caves in this neighbourhood, all pointing to a line of Buddhist occupation connecting Balkh with Kabul. As seen from the rock of Ghulgulah, Bamian, with its ruined towers, its colossi, its innumerable grottos, and with the singular red See also:colour of its barren See also:soil, presents an impressive aspect of desolation and See also:mystery. That the idols of Bamian, about which so many conjectures have been uttered, were Buddhist figures, is ascertained from the narrative of the See also:Chinese See also:pilgrim, Hsuan-Tsang, who saw them in their splendour in A.D. 630, and was verified by the See also:officers above named, who discovered other Buddhist caves and excavations in the valleys of the Balkhab and Sarikol.
Still vaster than these was a recumbent figure, 2 M. east of Bamian, representing Sakya See also:Buddha entering See also:Nirvana, i.e. in See also:act of See also:death. This was " about T000 ft. in length." No traces of this are alluded to by modern travellers, but in all likelihood it was only formed of See also:rubble plastered (as is the See also:case still with such Nirvana figures in Indo-See also:China) and of no durability. For a city so notable Bamian has a very obscure See also:history. It does not seem possible to identify it with any city in classical See also:geography: See also:Alexandria ad Caucasum it certainly was not. The first known mention of it seems to be that by Hsuan-Tsang, at a See also:time when apparently it had already passed its See also:meridian, and was the head of one of the small states into which the See also:empire of the See also: See Hon. M. G. Talbot, " The Rock-cut Caves and Statues of Bamian," See also:Journal R. Austral. See also:Soc. vol. xviii. See also:part 3; and J. A. See also: Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] BAMFORD, SAMUEL (1788-1872) |
[next] BAMPTON, JOHN (c. 169o-1751) |