Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ANTIBES

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V02, Page 121 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

ANTIBES , a seaport See also:

town in the See also:French See also:department of the Alpes-Maritimes (formerly in that of the See also:Var, but transferred after the Alpes-Maritimes department was formed in 1860 out of the See also:county of See also:Nice). Pop. (1906) of the town, 5730; of the See also:commune, 11,753. It is 122 m. by See also:rail S.W. of Nice, and is situated on the E. See also:side of the Garoupe See also:peninsula. It was formerly fortified, but all the ramparts (See also:save the Fort Carne, built by See also:Vauban) have now been demolished, and a new town is rising on their site. There is a tolerable See also:harbour, with a ;considerable fishing See also:industry. The See also:principal exports are dried fruits, See also:salt See also:fish I and oil. Much perfume distilling is done here, as the surrounding regnabit See also:quern non sperant. The roots of this eschatological See also:fancy are to be sought perhaps still deeper in a purely mythological and speculative expectation of a See also:battle at the end of days between See also:God and the See also:devil, which has no reference whatever to See also:historical occurrences. This See also:idea has its See also:original source in the apocalypses of See also:Iran, for these are based upon the conflict between Ahura-Mazda (Auramazda, See also:Ormazd) and Angro-Mainyush (See also:Ahriman) and its consummation at the end of the See also:world. This Iranian See also:dualism is proved to have penetrated into the See also:late Jewish See also:eschatology from the beginning of the tst See also:century before See also:Christ, and did so probably still earlier. Thus the opposition between God and the devil already plays a See also:part in the Jewish groundwork of the Testaments of the Patriarchs, which was perhaps composed at the end of the See also:period of the See also:Maccabees.

In this the name of the devil appears, besides the usual See also:

form ( Qaravas, &ajioXos), especially as Belial (Beliar, probably, from Ps. xviii. 4, where the See also:rivers of Belial are spoken of, originally a god of the under-world), a name which also plays a part in the See also:Antichrist tradition. In the See also:Ascension of See also:Moses we already hear, at the beginning of the description of the latter See also:time (x. I): " And then will God's See also:rule be made See also:manifest over all his creatures, then will the devilhave an end " (cf. Matt. xii. 28; See also:Luke xi. 2o; See also:John xii. 31, xiv. 3o, xvi. 11).1 This conception of the strife of God with the devil was further interwoven, before its introduction into the Antichrist myth, with another idea of different origin, namely, the myth derived from the Babylonian See also:religion, of the battle of the supreme God (See also:Marduk) with the See also:dragon of See also:chaos (Tiamat), originally a myth of the origin of things which, later perhaps, was changed into an eschatological one, again under Iranian See also:influence .2 Thus it comes that the devil, the opponent of God, appears in the end often also in the form of a terrible dragon-See also:monster; this appears most clearly in Rev. xii. Now it is possible that the whole conception of Antichrist has its final roots in this already complicated myth, that the form of the mighty adversary of God is but the See also:equivalent in human form of the devil or of the dragon of chaos. In any See also:case, however, this myth has exercised a formative influence on the conception of Antichrist.

For only thus can we explain how his figure acquires numerous superhuman and ghostly traits, which cannot be explained by any particular historical phenomenon on which it may have been based. Thus the figure of See also:

Antiochus IV. has already become superhuman, when in See also:Dan. viii. to, it is said that the little See also:horn " waxed See also:great, even to the See also:host of See also:heaven; and See also:cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground." Similarly See also:Pompey, in the second See also:psalm of See also:Solomon, is obviously represented as the dragon of chaos, and his figure exalted into myth. Without this See also:assumption of a continual infusion of mythological conceptions, we cannot understand the figure of Antichrist. Finally, it must be mentioned that Antichrist receives, at least in the later See also:sources, the name originally proper to the devil himself .3 From the See also:Jews, See also:Christianity took over the idea. It is See also:present quite unaltered in certain passages, specifically traceable to Judaism, e.g. (Rev. xi.). " The Beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless See also:pit " and, surrounded by a mighty host of nations, slays the " two witnesses " in See also:Jerusalem, is the entirely super-human Jewish conception of Antichrist. Even if the beast (ch. xiii.), which rises from the See also:sea at the See also:summons of the devil, be interpreted as the See also:Roman See also:empire, and, specially, as any particular Roman ruler, yet the original form of the malevolent See also:tyrant of the latter time is completely preserved. A fundamental See also:change of the whole idea from the specifically See also:Christian point of view, then, is signified by the conclusion of ch. ii. of the Second See also:Epistle to the See also:Thessalonians.' There can, of course, be no doubt as to the identity of the " See also:man of See also:sin, See further, Bousset, Religion See also:des Judentums, ed. ii. pp. 289 &c., 381 &c., 585 &c. 2 See Gunkel, Schopfung and Chaos (1893). 2 It is, of course, uncertain whether this phenomenon already occurs in 2 See also:Cor. vi.

15, since here Belial might still be Satan; cf. however, Ascensio Jesaiae iv. 2 &c. ; Sibyll. iii. 63 &c., ii. 167 &c. ' It is not necessary to decide whether the epistle is by St See also:

Paul or by a See also:pupil of Paul, although the former seems to the present writer to be by far the more probable, in spite of the brilliant attack on the genuineness of the epistle by See also:Wrede in Texte and Ilbersetzungen, N.F. ix. 2. 5 Cf. 2 Thess. ii. 8: the See also:Targum also. in its comment on the passage of See also:Isaiah, applies " the wicked " to Antichrist. See also:country See also:pro luces an abundance of See also:flowers. Antibes is the See also:ancient Antipolis.

It is said to have been founded before the Christian era (perhaps about 340 B.c.) by colonists from See also:

Marseilles, and is mentioned by See also:Strabo. It was the seat of a bishopric from the 5th century to 1244, when the see was transferred to See also:Grasse. (W. A. B.

End of Article: ANTIBES

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
ANTI, or CAMPA
[next]
ANTICHRIST (avrixpu ros)