Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

MARIA STELLA

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V17, Page 708 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

MARIA STELLA , the self-styled legitimate daughter of See also:

Philip, See also:duke of See also:Orleans. -According to her, See also:Louis Philippe was not the son of Philip duke of Orleans, but a suppositious See also:child, his See also:father being one Lorenzo Chiappini, See also:constable at the See also:village of Modigliana in See also:Tuscany. The See also:story is that the duke and duchess of Orleans, travelling under the incognito of See also:Comte and Comtesse de See also:Joinville, were at this village in See also:April 1773, when the duchess gave See also:birth to a daughter; and that the duke, desiring a son in See also:order to prevent the See also:rich Penthievre See also:inheritance from reverting to his wife's relations in the event of her See also:death, bribed the Chiappinis to substitute their newly-See also:born male child for his own. Maria Stella, the supposed daughter of Chiappini, went on the See also:stage at See also:Florence, where her putative parents had settled, and there at the See also:age of thirteen became the wife of the first See also:Lord Newborough, after whose death she married the See also:Russian See also:Count Ungern-See also:Sternberg. On the death of her putative father in 1821she received a See also:letter, written by him shortly before his death, in which he confessed that she was not his daughter, adding " See also:Heaven has repaired my See also:fault, since you are in a better position than your real father, though he was of almost similar See also:rank " (i.e. a See also:French nobleman). Maria Stella henceforward devoted her See also:time and See also:fortune to establishing her identity. Her first success was the See also:judgment of the episcopal See also:court at See also:Faenza, which in 1824 declared that the Comte Louis de Joinville exchanged his daughter for the son of Lorenzo Chiappini,and that the Demoiselle de Joinville had been baptized as Maria Stella, " with the false statement that she was the daughter of L. Chiappini and his wife." The See also:discovery that Joinville was a countship of the Orleans See also:family, and a real or fancied resemblance of Louis Philippe to Chiappini, convinced her that the duke of Orleans was the See also:person for whose See also:sake she had been cheated of her birthright, a conviction strengthened by the striking resemblance which many See also:people discovered in her to the princesses of the Orleans family. In 183o she published her proofs under the See also:title Maria Stella ou un See also:change d'une demoiselle du plus haul rang contre un gar(on de plus vile See also:condition (reprinted 1839 and 1849). This coincided with the See also:advent of Louis Philippe to the See also:throne, and her claim became a weapon for those who wished to throw discredit and ridicule on the " See also:bourgeois monarch." He for his See also:part treated the whole thing with amused contempt, and Baroness Newborough-Sternburg de Joinville, or See also:Marie Etoile d'Orleans, as she called herself, was suffered to live in See also:Paris until on the 23rd of See also:December 1843 she died in poverty and obscurity. In spite of much discussion and investigation, the See also:case of Maria Stella remains one of the unsolved problems of See also:history. See also:Sir See also:Ralph See also:Payne Gallwey's See also:Mystery of Maria Stella, See also:Lady Newborough (See also:London, 1907), is founded on her own accounts and argues in favour of her point of view.

More convincing, however, is See also:

Maurice Vitrac's Philippe-Egalite et M. Chiappini (Paris, 1907), which is based on unpublished material in the Archives nationales. M. Vitrac seeks to overthrow Maria Stella's case by an See also:alibi. The duke and duchess of See also:Chartres could not have been at Modigliana in April 1773, for the See also:simple See also:reason that they can be proved at that time to have been in Paris. On the 8th of April the duke, according to the See also:official See also:Gazette de See also:France, took part in the Maundy See also:Thursday ceremonies at See also:Versailles; from the 7th to the 14th he was in See also:constant attendance at the See also:lodge of Freemasons of which he had just been elected See also:grand See also:master. Moreover, it was impossible for the first See also:prince of the See also:blood royal to leave France without the royal permission, and his See also:absence would certainly have been remarked. Lastly, the duchess's accouchement, a semi-public See also:function in the case of royal princesses, did not take See also:place till the 6th of See also:October. M. Vitrac identifies the real father of Maria Stella with Count Carlo Battaglini of See also:Rimini, who died in 1796 without issue; the case being not one of substitution, but of See also:ordinary " farming out " to avoid a See also:scandal.

End of Article: MARIA STELLA

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
MARIA PLEYEL
[next]
MARIA THERESA (1717–1780)