Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:EPHORUS (c. 400–330 B.C.) , of Cyme in See also:Aeolis, in See also:Asia See also:Minor, See also:Greek historian. Together with the historian See also:Theopompus he was a See also:pupil of Isocrates, in whose school he attended two courses of See also:rhetoric. But he does not seem to have made much progress in the See also:art, and it is said to have been at the See also:suggestion of Isocrates himself that he took up See also:literary See also:composition and the study of See also:history. The See also:fruit of his labours was his `IrTopiaL in 29 books, the first universal history, beginning with the return of the See also:Heraclidae to See also:Peloponnesus, as the first well-attested See also:historical event. The whole See also:work was edited by his son Demophilus, who added a 36th See also:book, containing a See also:summary description of the Social See also:War and ending with the taking of See also:Perinthus (340) by See also: See also:Strabo (viii. p. 332) attaches much importance to his See also:geographical investigations, and praises him for being the first to separate the historical from the merely geographical See also:element. See also:Polybius (xii. 25 g) while crediting him with a knowledge of the conditions of See also:naval warfare, ridicules his description of the battles of See also:Leuctra and See also:Mantineia as showing See also:ignorance of the nature of See also:land operations. He was further to be commended for See also:drawing (though not always) a See also:sharp See also:line of demarcation between the mythical and historical (Strabo ix. p. 423); he even recognized that a profusion of detail, though lending corroborative force to accounts of See also:recent events, is ground for suspicion in reports of far-distant history. His See also:style was high-flown and artificial, as was natural considering his See also:early training, and he frequently sacrificed truth to rhetoric effect; but, according to See also:Dionysius of See also:Halicarnassus, he and Theopompus were the only historical writers whose See also:language was accurate and finished. Other See also:works attributed to him were: —A See also:Treatise on Discoveries; Respecting See also:Good and Evil Things; On Remarkable Things in Various Countries (it is doubtful whether these were separate works, or merely extracts from the Histories) ; A Treatise on my See also:Country, on the history and antiquities of Cyme, and an See also:essay On Style, his only rhetorical work, which is occasionally mentioned by the rhetorician See also:Theon. Nothing is known of his See also:life, except the statement in See also:Plutarch that he declined to visit the See also:court of See also: A. Klugmann, De Ephoro historico (186o) ; C. A. Volquardsen, Untersuchungen fiber See also:die Quellen der griechischen and sicilischen Geschichten bei Diodor. xi.-xvi. (1868) ; and specially J. B. See also:Bury, See also:Ancient Greek Historians (1909); E. Schwartz, in Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyc. s.v.; and See also:article See also:GREECE: History: Ancient Authorities. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] EPHOR (Gr. i4opos) |
[next] EPHRAEM SYRUS (Ephraim the Syrian) |