Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

POLYBIUS (c. 204–122 B.C.)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V22, Page 20 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

POLYBIUS (c. 204–122 B.C.) , See also:Greek historian, was a native of See also:Megalopolis in See also:Arcadia, the youngest of Greek cities (Paus. viii. 9), which, however, played an See also:honourable See also:part in the last days of Greek freedom as a stanch member of the Achaean See also:League (q.v.), His See also:father, Lycortas, was the intimate friend of See also:Philopoemen, and on the See also:death of the latter, in 182, succeeded him as See also:leader of the league. The date of Polybius's See also:birth is doubtful. He tells us himself that in 181 he had not yet reached the See also:age (? See also:thirty years, Polyb. See also:xxix. 9) at which an Achaean was legally capable of holding See also:office (See also:xxiv. 6). We learn from See also:Cicero (Ad Pam. v. 12) that he outlived the Numantine See also:War, which ended [in 132, and from See also:Lucian (Macrob. 22) that he died at the age of eighty-two. The See also:majority of authorities therefore See also:place his birth between 214 and 204 B.C. Little is known of his See also:early See also:life.

As the son of Lycortas he was naturally brought into See also:

close contact with the leading men of the Achaean League. With Philopoemen he seems to have been on intimate terms. After Philopoemen's tragic death in See also:Messenia (182) he was entrusted with the See also:honour-able See also:duty of conveying See also:home the See also:urn in which his ashes had been deposited (Plut. Phil. 21). In 181, together with his father, Lycortas and the younger See also:Aratus, he was appointed, in spite of his youth, a member of the See also:embassy which was to visit See also:Ptolemy Epiphanes, See also:king of See also:Egypt, a See also:mission, however, which the sudden death of Ptolemy brought to a premature end (See also:xxv. 7). The next twelve years of his life are a See also:blank, but in 169 he reappears as a trusted adviser of the See also:Achaeans at a difficult crisis in the See also:history of the League. In 171 war had broken out between See also:Rome and the Macedonian king See also:Perseus, and the Achaean statesmen were divided as to the policy to be pursued; there were See also:good reasons for fearing that the See also:Roman See also:senate would regard See also:neutrality as indicating a See also:secret leaning towards Macedon. Polybius therefore declared for an open See also:alliance with Rome, and his views were adopted. It was decided to send an Achaean force to co-operate with the Roman See also:general, and Polybius was selected to command the See also:cavalry. The Roman See also:consul declined the proffered assistance, but Polybius accompanied him throughout the See also:campaign, and thus gained his first insight into the military See also:system of Rome.

In the next See also:

year (168) both Lycortas and Polybius were on the point of starting at the See also:head of 1200 Achaeans to take service in Egypt against the Syrians, when an intimation from the Roman See also:commander that armed interference was undesirable put a stop to the expedition ()Exix. 23). The success of Rome in the war with Perseus was now assured. The final victory was rapidly followed by the arrival in See also:Achaea of Roman commissioners charged with the duty of establishing Roman interests there. Polybius was arrested with r000 of the See also:principal Achaeans, but, while his companions were condemned to a tedious incarceration in the See also:country towns of See also:Italy, he obtained permission to reside in Rome. This See also:privilege he owed to the See also:influence of L. See also:Aemilius Paullus and his two sons, Scipio and See also:Fabius (xxxii. 9). Polybius was received into Aemilius's See also:house, and became the instructor of his sons. Between Scipio (P. See also:Cornelius Scipio See also:Africanus the younger), the future ^onqueror of See also:Carthage, and himself a friendship soon sprang up,which ripened into a lifelong intimacy, and was of inestimable service to him throughout his career. It protected him from interference, opened to him the highest circles of Roman society, and enabled him to acquire a See also:personal influence with the leading men, which stood him in good See also:stead when he afterwards came forward to mediate between his countrymen and Rome.

It placed within his reach opportunities for a close study of Rome and the See also:

Romans such as had fallen to no historian before him, and secured him the requisite leisure for using them, while Scipio's liberality more than once supplied him with the means of conducting difficult and costly See also:historical investigations (See also:Pliny, N.H. v. 9). In 151 the few surviving exiles were allowed to return to See also:Greece. But the stay of Polybius in Achaea was brief. The estimation in which he was held at Rome is clearly shown by the anxiety of the consul See also:Marcus (or See also:Manlius) See also:Manilius (149) to take him as his adviser on his expedition against Carthage. Polybius started to join him, but See also:broke off his See also:journey at Corcyra on learning that the Carthaginians were inclined to yield (See also:xxxvi. 3). But when, in 147, Scipio himself took the command in See also:Africa, Polybius hastened to join him, and was an See also:eye-See also:witness of the See also:siege and destruction of Carthage. During his See also:absence in Africa the Achaeans had made a last desperate See also:attempt to assert their See also:independence of Rome. He returned in 146 to find See also:Corinth in ruins, the fairest cities of Achaea at the See also:mercy of the Roman soldiery, and the famous Achaean League shattered to pieces (see ACHAEAN LEAGUE). All the influence he possessed was freely spent in endeavouring to See also:shield his countrymen from the worst consequences of their rashness. The excesses of the soldiery were checked, and at his See also:special intercession the statues of Aratus and Philopoemen were preserved (xxxix.

14). An even more difficult task was that entrusted to him by the Roman authorities themselves, of persuading the Achaeans to acquiesce in the new regime imposed upon them by their conquerors, and of setting the new machinery in working See also:

order. With this See also:work, which he accomplished so as to See also:earn the heartfelt, gratitude of his countrymen (xxxix. 16), his public career seems to have closed. The See also:rest of his life was, so far as we know, devoted to the See also:great history which is the lasting See also:monument of his fame. He died, at the age of eighty-two, of a fall from his See also:horse (Lucian, Macrob. 22). The See also:base of a statue erected to him by Ells was found at See also:Olympia in 1877. It bears the inscription rats i 'Hkeiwv HoXv(3wov Avtcbpra MeyaXosroXirnie Of the See also:forty books which made up the history of Polybius, the first five alone have come down to us in a See also:complete See also:form; of the rest we have only more or less copious fragments. But the general See also:plan and See also:scope of the work are explained by Polybius himself. His intention was to make See also:plain how and why it was that " all the known regions of the civilized See also:world had fallen under the sway of Rome " (iii. 1).

This See also:

empire of Rome, unprecedented in its extent and still more so in the rapidity with which it had been ac- uired, was the See also:standing wonder of the age, and " who," he exclaims (i. 1), " is so poor-spirited or indolent as not to wish to know by what means, and thanks to what sort of constitution, the Romans subdued the world in something less than fifty-three years? These fifty-three years are those between 22o (the point at which the work of Aratus ended) and 168 n.c., and extend therefore from the outbreak of the Hannibalic War to the defeat of Perseus at Pydna. To this See also:period then the See also:main portion of his history is devoted from the third to the thirtieth See also:book inclusive. But for clearness' See also:sake he prefixes in bks. i. and ii. such a preliminary See also:sketch of the earlier history of Rome, of the First Punic War, and of the contemporary events in Greece and See also:Asia, as will enable his readers more fully to understand what follows. This seems to have been his See also:original plan, but at the opening of bk. iii., written apparently after 146, he explains that he thought it desirable to add some See also:account of the manner in which the Romans exercised the See also:power they had won, of their temperament and policy and of the final See also:catastrophe which destroyed Carthage and for ever broke np the Achaean League (iii. 4, 5). To this appendix, giving the history from 168–146, the last ten books are devoted. Whatever See also:fault may be found with Polybius, there can be no question that he had formed a high conception of the task before him. He See also:lays repeated stress on two qualities as distinguishing his history from the See also:ordinary run of historical compositions. The first of these, its synoptic See also:character, was partly necessitated by the nature of the period. The various states fringing the See also:basin of the Mediterranean had become so inextricably interwoven that it was no longer possible to See also:deal with them in See also:isolation.

Polybius therefore claims for his history that it will take a comprehensive, view of the whole course of events in the civilized world, within the limits of the period (i. 4). He thus aims at placing before his readers at each See also:

stage a complete survey of the See also:field of See also:action from See also:Spain to See also:Syria and Egypt. This synoptic method proceeds from a true appreciation of what is now called the unity of history, and to Polybius must be given the See also:credit of having first firmly grasped and clearly enforced a See also:lesson which the events of his own See also:time were especially well calculated to See also:teach. It is the great merit of his work that it gives such a picture of the 2nd and 3rd centuries B.C. as no See also:series of special narratives could have supplied. The second quality upon which Polybius insists as distinguishing his history from all others is its " pragmatic " character. It deals, that is, with events and with their causes, and aims at an accurate See also:record and explanation of ascertained facts. This pragmatic method " (ix. 2) makes history intelligible by explaining the how and the why; and, secondly, it is only when so written that history can perform its true See also:function of instructing and guiding those who study it. For the great use of history, according to Polybius, is to contribute to the right conduct of human life (i. 35). But this it can do only if the historian bears in mind the true nature of his task.

He must remember that the historian should not write as the dramatist does to See also:

charm or excite his See also:audience for the moment (ii. 56). He will aim simply at exhibiting events in their true See also:light, setting forth " the why and the how " in each See also:case, not confusing causes and occasions, or dragging in old wives' fables, prodigies and marvels (ii. i6, iii. 48). He will omit nothing which can help to explain the events, he is dealing with : the See also:genius and temperament of particular peoples, their See also:political and military systems, the characters of the leading men, the See also:geographical features of the country, must all be taken into account. To this conception of history Polybius is on the whole consistently faithful. It is true that his anxiety to instruct leads often to a rather wearisome iteration of his favourite See also:maxims, and that his digressions, such as that on the military See also:art, are occasionally provokingly See also:long and didactic. But his comments and reflections are for the most part See also:sound and instructive (e.g. those on the lessons to be learnt from the revolt of the mercenaries in Africa, i. 65; from the See also:Celtic raids in Italy, ii. 35 ; and on the Roman character), while among his digressions are included such invaluable chapters as those on the Roman constitution (bk. vi), the graphic description of Cisalpine See also:Gaul (bk. ii.) and the account of the rise and constitution of the Achaean League (ii. 38 seq.). To his anxiety again to trace back events to their first causes we owe, not only the careful inquiry (bk. iii.) into the origin of the Second Punic War, but the sketch of early Roman history in bk. i., and of the early See also:treaties between Rome and Carthage in iii.

22 seq. Among the many defects which he censures in previous historians, not the least serious in his eyes are their inattention to the political and geographical surroundings of the history (ii. 16, iii. 36), and their neglect duly to set forth the causes of events (iii. 6). Polybius is equally explicit as regards the personal qualifications necessary for a good historian, and in this respect too his practice is in close agreement with his theory. Without a personal knowledge of affairs a writer will inevitably distort the true relations and importance of events (xii. 28). Such experience would have saved accomplished and fluent Greek writers like See also:

Timaeus from many of their blunders (xii. 25a), but the shortcomings of Roman soldiers ' and senators like Q. Fabius Pictor show that it is not enough by itself. Equally indispensable is careful painstaking See also:research.

All available See also:

evidence must be collected, thoroughly sifted, soberly weighed, and, 'lastly, the historian must be animated by a sincere love of truth and a See also:calm impartiality. It is important to consider how far Polybius himself comes up to his See also:standard. In his personal acquaintance with affairs, in the variety of his experience, and in his opportunities for forming a correct See also:judgment on events he is without a See also:rival among See also:ancient historians. A great part of the period of which he treats See also:fell within his own lifetime (iv. 2). He may just have remembered the See also:battle of Cynoscephalae (197), and, as we have seen, he was actively engaged in the military and political affairs of the Achaean League. During his See also:exile in Rome he was able to study the Roman constitution, and the peculiarities of the Roman temperament; he made the acquaintance of Roman senators, and became the intimate friend of the greatest Roman of the See also:day. Lastly, he was able to survey with his own eyes the field on which the great struggle between Rome and See also:Hannibal was fought out. He See also:left Rome only to witness the crowning See also:triumph of Roman arms in Africa, and to gain a See also:practical acquaintance with Roman methods of See also:government by assisting in the See also:settlement of Achaea. When, in 146, his public life closed, he completed his preparation of himself for his great work by laborious investigations of archives and monuments, and by a careful personal examination of historical sites and scenes. To all this we must add that he was deeply read in the learning of his day, above all in the writings of earlier historians. Of Polybius's anxiety to get at the truth no better See also:proof can be given than his conscientious investigation of original documents and monuments, and his careful study of See also:geography and See also:topography —both of them points in which his predecessors, as well as his successor See also:Livy, conspicuously failed.

Polybius is careful constantly to remind us that he writes for those who are ciao e9eirlovers of knowledge, with whom truth is the first See also:

consideration. He closely studied the See also:bronze tablets in, Rome on which were in. scribed the early treaties concluded between Romans and Carthaginians. He quotes the actual See also:language of the treaty which ended the First Punic War (i.62), and of that between Hannibal and See also:Philip of Macedon (vii. 9). In xvi. 15 he refers to a document which he had personally inspected in the archives at See also:Rhodes, and in iii. 33 to the monument on the Lacinian promontory, recording the number of Hannibal's forces. According. to See also:Dionysius, i. 17, he got his date forthe See also:foundation of Rome from a tablet in the pontifical archives. As instances of his careful See also:attention to geography and topography we have not only the fact of his widely extended travels, from the See also:African See also:coast and the Pillars of See also:Hercules in the See also:west, to the Euxine and the coasts of Asia See also:Minor in the See also:east, but also the geographical and topographical studies scattered throughout his history. Next to the duty of original research, Polybius ranks that of impartiality. Some amount of See also:bias in favour of one's own country may, he thinks, be pardoned as natural (xvi.

14) ; but it is unpardonable, he says, for the historian to set anything whatever above the truth. And on the whole, Polybius must be allowed here again to have practised what he preached. It is true that his See also:

affection for and See also:pride in Arcadia appear in more than one passage (iv. 20, 21). as also does his dislike of the Aetolians (ii. 45, iv. 3, 16). His treatment of Aratus and Philopoemen, the heroes of the Achaean League, and of Cleomenes of See also:Sparta, its most See also:constant enemy, is perhaps open to severer See also:criticism. Certainly Cleomenes does not receive full See also:justice at his hands. Similarly his views of Rome and the Romans may have been influenced by his See also:firm belief in the See also:necessity of accepting the Roman supremacy as inevitable, and by his intimacy with Scipio. He had a deep admiration for the great See also:republic, for her well-balanced constitution, for her military system, and for the character of her citizens. But just as his patriotism does not See also:blind him to the faults and follies of his country-men (xxxviii. 4, 5, 6), so he does not See also:scruple to criticize Rome.

He notices the incipient degeneracy of Rome after 146 (xviii. 85). He endeavours to hold the See also:

balance evenly between Rome and Carthage; he strongly condemns the Roman occupation of See also:Sardinia as a See also:breach of faith (iii. 28, 31) ; and he does full justice to Hannibal. Moreover, there can be no doubt that he sketched the Roman character in a masterly See also:fashion. His See also:interest in the study of character and his skill in its delineation are everywhere 'noticeable. He believes, indeed, in an over-ruling See also:fortune, which guides the course of events. It is fortune which has fashioned anew the See also:face of the world in his own time ON. 2), which has brought the whole civilized world into subjection to Rome (i. 4) ; and the Roman Empire itself is the most marvellous of her See also:works (viii. 4). But under fortune not only political and geographical conditions but the characters and temperaments of nations and individuals See also:play their part.

The Romans had been fitted by. their previous struggles for the See also:

conquest of the world (i. 63) ; they were chosen to punish the treachery of Philip of Macedon (xv. 4) ; and the greatest of them, Scipio himself, Polybius regards as the especial favourite of fortune (xxxii. i5; X. 5). In respect of form, Polybius is far the inferior of Livy, partly owing. to his very virtues. His laudable See also:desire to See also:present a picture of the whole political situation at each important moment is fatal to the continuity of his narrative, Thus the thrilling See also:story of the Second Punic War is broken in upon by digressions on the See also:con-temporary affairs in Greece and Asia. More serious, however, than this excessive See also:lover of synchronism is his almost pedantic anxiety to edify. For See also:grace. and elegance of See also:composition, and for the See also:artistic presentation of events, he has a hardly concealed con-tempt. Hence a general and almost studied carelessness of effect, which See also:mars his whole work. On the other See also:hand he is never weary of See also:preaching. His favourite theories of the nature and aims of history, of the distinction between the universal and special histories, of the duties of an historian, sound as most of them are in them-selves, are enforced with wearisome iteration; more than once the effect of a graphic picture is spoilt by obtrusive moralizing. Nor, lastly, is Polybius's See also:style itself such as to compensate for these defects.

It is, indeed, often impressive from the evident earnestness of the writer, and from his sense of the gravity of his subject, and is unspoilt by See also:

rhetoric or conceit. It has about it the See also:ring of reality; the language is sometimes pithy and vigorous; and now and then, we meet with See also:apt metaphors, such as those 'borrowed from See also:boxing (i. 57), from See also:cock-fighting (i. 58), from See also:draughts (i. 84). But, in spite of these redeeming features, the prevailing baldness of Polybius's style excludes him from the first See also:rank among classical writers; and it is impossible to See also:quarrel with the See also:verdict pronounced by Dionysius of See also:Halicarnassus, who places him among those authors of later times who neglected the See also:graces of style, and who paid for their neglect by leaving behind 'them works which no one was patient enough to read through to the end." It is to the value and variety of his See also:matter, to his See also:critical insight, breadth of view and wide research, and not least to the surpassing importance and interest of the period with which he deals, that Polybius owes his place among the writers of history. What is known as to the fortunes of his histories, and the reputation they enjoyed, fully bears out this conclusion. The silence respecting him maintained by See also:Quintilian and by Lucian may reasonably be (v. 20), and is accepted as genuine . by Harnacka and See also:Kruger.t taken to imply their agreement with Dionysius as to his merits as a See also:master of style. On the other hand, Cicero (De off. iii. 32) describes him as " See also:bonus auctor in primis "; in the De republics (ii. 14) he praises highly his accuracy in matters of See also:chronology; and Cicero's younger contemporary, Marcus See also:Brutus, was a devoted student of Polybius, and was engaged on the See also:eve of the battle of Pharsalia in compiling an See also:epitome of his histories (Suidas, s.v.; See also:Plutarch, See also:Brut.

4). Livy, however, notwithstanding the extent to which he used his writings (see LIvy), speaks of him in such qualified terms as to suggest the See also:

idea that his strong artistic sensibilities had been wounded by Polybius's See also:literary defects. He has nothing better to say of him than that he is by no means contemptible " (See also:xxx. 45), and " not an untrustworthy author " (xxxiii. 1o). See also:Posidonius and See also:Strabo, both of them See also:Stoics like Polybius himself, are said to have written continuations of his history (Suidas, s.v.; Strabo p. 515). See also:Arrian in the early part of the 2nd and See also:Aelian in the 3rd See also:century both speak of him with respect, though with reference mainly to his excellence as an authority on the art of war. In addition to his Histories Polybius was the author of the following smaller works: a life of Philopoemen (Polyb. x. 24), a history of the Numantine War (Cie. Ad Fam. v. 12), a See also:treatise on See also:tactics (Polyb. ix.

20; Arrian, Tactica; Aelian, Tact. i.). The geographical treatise, referred to by Geminus, is possibly identical with the thirty-See also:

fourth book of the Histories (See also:Schweighauser, Praef p. 184. The following are the more important See also:modern See also:editions of Polybius : See also:Ernesti (3 vols., 1763-1764); Schweighauser (8 vols., 1793, and See also:Oxford, 1823) ; See also:Bekker (2 vols., 1844) ; L. See also:Dindorf (4 vols., 1866-1868, 2nd ed., T. Buttner-Wobst, 5 vols., See also:Leipzig, 1882-1904) ; Hultsch (4 vols., 1867-1871); J. L. See also:Strachan-See also:Davidson, Selections from Polybius (Oxford, 1888). For the literature of the subject, see Engelmann, Biblioth. script. class.: Script. graeci, pp. 646-65o (8th ed. Leipzig, 188o). See also W.

W. Capes, The History of the Achaean League (See also:

London, 1888) ; F. Susemihl, Gesch. d. griech. Litteratur in d. Alexandrinerzeit, ii. 8o-128 (Leipzig, 1891-1892); O. Cuntz, Polybios and sein Werk (Leipzig, 1902); R. v. Scala, See also:Die Studien See also:des Polybios (See also:Stuttgart, 189o); J. B. See also:Bury, Ancient Greek Historians (1909), ` a whole-hearted appreciation of Polybius "; J. L. Strachan-Davidson, in Hellenica, pp.

353-387 (London, 1898), and in Appendix II. to Selections from Polybius pp. 642-668 (Oxford, 1888). (H. F.

End of Article: POLYBIUS (c. 204–122 B.C.)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
POLYANTHUS
[next]
POLYCARP (c. 6g-c. 155)