Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:SCHLOSSER, See also:FRIEDRICH CHRISTOPH (1776—1861) , See also:German historian, was See also:born at See also:Jever in See also:East See also:Friesland on the 17th of See also:November 1776. He took up the study of See also:theology, mainly at See also:Gottingen, and began See also:life as a private See also:tutor. Turning to the study of See also:history, he carried with him the tendency to construct his syntheses upon the scanty basis of 18th-See also:century generalizations; yet in spite of the growing scientific school he became and remained for a See also:quarter of a century the most popular German historian. In 1807, inspired by his study of See also:Dante, he published his first See also:work Abdlard and Dulcin, a See also:defence of See also:scholasticism and See also:medieval thought. Two years later See also:biographical studies of See also:Theodore See also:Beza and See also:Peter See also:Martyr Vermili (Leben See also:des Theodor de Beza and des Peter Martyr Vermili, See also:Heidelberg, 1809) revealed more genuine scholarship. In 1812 appeared his History of the Iconoclastic Emperors of the East (Geschichte der bilderstiurmenden Kaiser des ostromischen Reichs), in which he controverted some points in See also:Gibbon and sought to avoid See also:painting the past in See also:present-See also:day See also:colours. His own strong predispositions prevented him from accomplishing this, however, and the history remains open to See also:grave scientific See also:criticism. But it won for him the favour of See also:Archbishop Karl Theodor See also:Dalberg, and secured for him a professorship in the See also:Frankfort See also:Lyceum. He See also:left Frankfort in 1819 to become See also:professor of history at Heidelberg, where he resided until his See also:death on the 23rd of See also:September 1861. In 1815 appeared the first See also:volume of his See also:World History (Weltgeschichte in zusammenhdngender Erzahlung). This work, though never completed, was extended through many volumes, bespeaking an inexhaustible See also:energy and a vast erudition. But it lacks both accuracy of fact and See also:charm of See also:style, and is to-day deservedly quite forgotten. On the other See also:hand a See also:translation of the pedagogical handbook of See also:Vincent of See also:Beauvais and the accompanying monograph are still of value. The next See also:note-worthy work was a history of antiquity and its culture (Universalhistorische Ubersicht der Geschichte der See also:alien Welt and ihrer Kultur, 1st See also:part, 1826; 2nd part, 1834), which, while revealing little knowledge of the new criticism of See also:sources inaugurated by F. A. See also:Wolf and B. G. See also:Niebuhr, won its way by its unique handling of the subject and its See also:grand style. In 1823 he published in two volumes a Geschichte des 18ten Jahrhunderts; then, enlarged and improved, this work appeared in six volumes as Geschichte des i8ten Jahrhunderts and des' 9ten bis zum Sturz des franzosischen Kaiserreichs (1836—1848). The history had a most extraordinary success, especially among the See also:common See also:people, owing, not to its scientific qualities, but to the fact that the author boldly and sternly sat in See also:judgment upon men and events, and in his judgments voiced the feelings of the German nation in his day. For this very See also:reason it is no longer read. It has been translated into See also:English by D. See also:Davison (8 vols., 1843—1852). Finally, Schlosser undertook a popular World History for the German People (Weltgeschichte far das deutsche Voile, 1844—1857), which also enjoyed the favour of those for whom it was written. Schlosser stands apart from the See also:movement towards scientific history in See also:Germany in the 19th century. Refusing to limit himself to See also:political history, as did See also:Ranke, he never learned to handle his See also:literary sources with the care of the scientific historian. History was to him, as it had been to See also:Cicero, a school for morals; but See also:lie had perhaps a juster conception than Ranke of the breadth and See also:scope of the historian's See also: C. Schlosser (See also:Vienna, 1878). Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] SCHLIEMANN, HEINRICH (1822-1890) |
[next] SCHLOTHEIM, ERNST FRIEDRICH, BARON VON (1764-1832) |