Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:LAMORICIERE, CHRISTOPHE See also:LEON See also: LA MOTHE LE VAYER, See also:FRANCOIS DE (1588–1672), French writer, was born in Paris of a See also:noble See also:family of See also:Maine. His See also:father was an avocat at the See also:parlement of Paris and author of a curious See also:treatise on the functions of ambassadors, entitled Legatus, seu De legatorum privilegiis, officio et munere libellus (1579) and illustrated mainly from See also:ancient See also:history. Francois succeeded his father at the parlement, but gave up his See also:post about 1647 and devoted himself to travel and belles lettres. His Considerations sur l'eloquence francaise (1638) procured him See also:admission to the See also:Academy, and his De l'instruction de Mgr. le Dauphin (164o) attracted the See also:attention of See also:Richelieu. In 1649 See also:Anne of See also:Austria entrusted him with the See also:education of her second son and subsequently with the completion of Louis XIV.'s education, which had been very much neglected. The outcome of his pedagogic labours was a See also:series of books comprising the Geographic, Rhetorique, Morale, Economique, Politique, Logique, and Physique du See also:prince (1651–1658). The See also: See also:Etienne, Essai sur La Mothe Le Vayer (Paris, 1849). LA MOTTE, See also:ANTOINE HOUDAR DE (1672–1731), French author, was born in Paris on the 18th of See also:January 1672. In 1693 his See also:comedy Les Originaux proved a complete failure, which so depressed the author that he contemplated joining the See also:Trappists, but four years later he again began See also:writing operas and ballets, e.g. L'See also:Europe galante (1697), and tragedies; one of which, Ines de See also:Castro (1723), was produced with immense success at the See also:Theatre See also:Francais. He was a See also:champion of the moderns in the revived controversy of the ancients and moderns. Madame See also:Dacier had published (1699) a See also:translation of the Iliad, and La Motte, who knew no See also:Greek, made a translation (1714) in See also:verse founded on her See also:work. The nature of his work may be judged from his own expression: " I have taken the See also:liberty to See also:change what I thought disagreeable in it." He defended the moderns in the Discours sur Homere prefixed to his translation, and in his Reflexions sur la critique (1716). Apart from the merits of the controversy, it was conducted on La Motte's See also:side with a wit and politeness which compared very favourably with his opponent's methods. He was elected to the Academy in 1710, and soon after became See also:blind. La Motte carried on a See also:correspondence with the duchesse du Maine, and was the friend of See also:Fontenelle. He had the same freedom from See also:prejudice, the same inquiring mind as the latter, and it is on the excellent See also:prose in which his views are expressed that his reputation rests. He died in Paris on the 26th of December 1731. His Euvres du thedtre (2 vols.) appeared in 1730, and his Euvres (to vols.) in 1754. See A. H. Rigault, Histoire de la querelle See also:des anciens et des modernes (1859). Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] LAMONT, JOHANN VON (1805–1879) |
[next] LAMOUREUX, CHARLES (1834-1899) |