Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:CARLSBAD DECREES (Karlsbader Beschlusse) , the name usually given to a See also:series of resolutions (Beschliisse) passed by a See also:conference of the ministers and envoys of the more important See also:German states, held at Carlsbad from the 6th to the 31st of See also:August 1819. The occasion of the See also:meeting was the See also:desire of See also:Prince Metternich to take See also:advantage of the consternation caused by See also:recent revolutionary outrages (especially the See also:murder of the dramatist See also:Kotzebue by Karl See also:Sand) to persuade the German governments to combine in a See also:system for the suppression of the Liberal agitation in See also:Germany. The pretended urgency of the See also:case served as the excuse for only inviting to the conference those states whose ministers happened to be visiting Carlsbad at the See also:time. The conferences were, therefore, actually attended bythe representatives of See also:Austria, See also:Prussia, See also:Saxony, See also:Bavaria, See also:Wurttemberg, See also:Hanover, See also:Baden, See also:Nassau and See also:Mecklenburg; at the See also:fourth conference (August 9th) See also:Baron von Fritsch, See also:minister of See also:state for See also:Saxe-See also:Weimar, who " happened to be See also:present " at Carlsbad on that See also:day, attended by See also:special invitation. Prince Metternich presided over the conferences, and See also:Friedrich von See also:Gentz acted as secretary. The business to be discussed, as announced in Metternich's opening address, was twofold: (I) Matters of urger importance necessitating immediate See also:action; (2) Questions affecting the fundamental constitution of the German See also:Confederation, demanding more careful and prolonged discussion. To the first class belonged (a) the urgent See also:necessity for a See also:uniform system of See also:press regulation in Germany; (b) the most urgent See also:measures in regard to the supervision of See also:universities and See also:schools; (c) measures in view of the already discovered machinations of the See also:political parties. To the second class belonged (a) the more clear See also:definition of See also:article XIII. of the See also:Act of Confederation (i.e. state constitutions); (b) the creation of a permanent federal supreme See also:court; (c) the creation of a federal executive organization (Bundes-Executions Ordnung) armed with See also:power to make the decrees of the See also:diet and the judgments of the high court effective; (d) the facilitation of commercial intercourse within the See also:con-federation in accordance with article XIX. of the Act of Con-federation (Beilage A. zum ersten Protokoll, See also:Martens, iv. p. 74). These questions were debated in twenty-three formal conferences. On the issues raised by the first class there was See also:practical unanimity. All were agreed that the state of Germany demanded disciplinary measures, and as the result of the deliberations it was determined to See also:lay before the federal diet definite proposals for (1) a uniform press censorship over all periodical publications; (2) a system of " curators " to supervise the See also:education given in universities and schools, with disciplinary enactments against professors and teachers who should use their position for purposes of political propaganda; (3) the erection of a central See also:commission at See also:Mainz, armed with inquisitorial See also:powers, for the purpose of unmasking the widespread revolutionary See also:conspiracy, the existence of which was assumed. On the questions raised under the second class there was more fundamental difference of See also:opinion, and by far the greater See also:part of the time of the conference was occupied in discussing the burning question of the due See also:interpretation of article XIII. The controversy raged See also:round the distinction between " assemblies of estates," as laid down in the article, and " representative assemblies," such as had been already established in several German states. Gentz, in an elaborate memorandum (Nebenbeilage zum siebenten Protokoll, iv. p. 102), laid down that See also:representation by estates was the only system compatible with the conservative principle, as the " outcome of a well-ordered See also:civil society, in which the relations and rights of the several estates are due to the See also:peculiar position of the classes and corporations on which they are based, which have been from time to time modified by See also:law without detracting from the essentials of the See also:sovereign power "; whereas representative assemblies are based on " the See also:sovereignty of the See also:people." In See also:answer to this, See also:Count Wintzingerode, on behalf of the See also: An interesting See also:criticism of the Carlsbad Decrees is appended (p. 166), addressed by Baron Hans von See also:Gagern, See also:Luxemburg representative in the federal diet, to Baron von PRssen, Mecklenburg plenipotentiary at the conference of Carlsbad. (W. A. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] CARLSBAD |
[next] CARLSTADT, KARLSTADT |