Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:EMPEDOCLES (c. 490–430 B.C.) , See also:Greek philosopher and
statesman, was l5orn at See also:Agrigentum (Acragas, See also:Girgenti) in See also:Sicily of a distinguished See also:family, then at the height of its See also:glory. His grandfather Empedocles was victorious in the Olympian See also:chariot See also:race in 496; in 470 his See also:father Meto was largely instrumental in the overthrow of the See also:tyrant Thrasydaeus. We know almost nothing of his See also:life. The numerous legends which have grown up See also:round his name yield very little that can fairly be regarded as See also:authentic. It seems that: he carried on the democratic tradition of his See also:house by helping to overthrow an oligarchic See also:government which succeeded the tyranny in Agrigentum, and was invited by the citizens to become their See also: To his contemporaries, as to himself, he seemed more than a See also:mere See also:man. The Sicilians honoured his See also:august aspect as he moved amongst them with See also:purple See also:robes and See also:golden See also:girdle, with See also:long See also:hair See also:bound by a Delphic See also:garland, and brazen sandals on his feet, and with a See also:retinue of slaves behind him. Stories were told of the ingenuity and generosity by which he had made the marshes round See also:Selinus salubrious, of the See also:grotesque See also:device by which he laid the winds that ruined the harvests of Agrigentum, and of the almost miraculous restoration to life of a woman who had long lain in a See also:death-like See also:trance. Legends stranger still told of his disappearance from among men. Empedocles, according to one See also:story, was one midnight, after a feast held in his honour, called away in a See also:blaze of glory to the gods; according to another, he had only thrown himself into the See also:crater of See also:Etna, in the See also:hope that men, finding no traces of his end, would suppose him translated to See also:heaven. But his hopes were cheated by the See also:volcano, which See also:cast forth his brazen sandals and betrayed his See also:secret (Diog. Laert. viii. 67). The See also:people of Agrigentum have never ceased to honour his name, and even in See also:modern times he has been celebrated by followers of Mazzini as the democrat of antiquity par excellence. As his See also:history is uncertain, so his doctrines are hard to put together. He does not belong to any one definite school. While, on one See also:hand, he combines much that had been suggested by Parmenides, See also:Pythagoras and the Ionic See also:schools, he has germs of truth that See also:Plato and Aristotle afterwards See also:developed; he is at once a See also:firm believer in Orphic mysteries, and a scientific thinker, precursor of the See also:physical scientists. There are, according to Empedocles, four ultimate elements, four primal divinities, of which are made all structures in the See also:world--See also:fire, See also:air, See also:water, See also:earth. These four elements are eternally brought into See also:union, and eternally parted from each other, by two divine beings or See also:powers, love and hatred—an attractive and a repulsive force which the See also:ordinary See also:eye can see working amongst men, but which really pervade the whole world. According to the different proportions in which these four indestructible and unchangeable matters are combined with each other is the difference of, the organic structure produced; e.g. flesh and See also:blood are made of equal (in See also:weight but not in See also:volume) parts of all four elements, whereas bones are one-See also:half fire, one-See also:fourth earth, and one-fourth water. It is in the See also:aggregation and segregation of elements thus arising that Empedocles, like the atomists, finds the real See also:process which corresponds to what is popularly termed growth, increase or decrease. Nothing new comes or can come into being; the only change that can occur is a change in the juxtaposition of See also:element with element. Empedocles apparently regarded love (cNMe ls) and discord (veIKOS) as alternately holding the See also:empire over things,—neither, however, being ever quite absent. As the best and original See also:state, he seems to have conceived a See also:period when love was pre-dominant, and all the elements formed one See also:great See also:sphere or globe. Since that period discord had gained more sway; and the actual world was full of contrasts and oppositions, due to the combined See also:action of both principles. His theory attempted to explain the separation of elements, the formation of earth and See also:sea, of See also:sun and See also:moon, of See also:atmosphere. But the most interesting and most matured See also:part of his views dealt with the first origin of See also:plants and animals, and with the See also:physiology of man. As the elements (his deities) entered into combinations, there appeared See also:quaint results—heads without necks, arms without shoulders. Then as these fragmentary structures met, there were seen horned heads on human bodies, bodies of oxen with men's heads, and figures of See also:double See also:sex. But most of these products of natural forces disappeared as suddenly as they arose; only in those rare cases where the several parts were found adapted to each other, and casual member fitted into casual member, did the complex structures thus formed last. Thusfrom spontaneous aggregations of casual aggregates, which suited each other as if this had been intended, did the organic universe originally See also:spring. Soon various influences reduced the creatures of double sex to a male and a See also:female, and the world was replenished with organic life. It is impossible not to see in this thecry a crude anticipation of the " survival of the fittest "theory of modern evolutionists. As man, See also:animal and plant are composed of the same elements in different proportions, there is an identity of nature in them all. They all have sense and understanding; in man, however, and especially in the blood at his See also:heart, mind has its See also:peculiar seat. But mind is always dependent upon the See also:body, and varies with its changing constitution. Hence the precepts of morality are with Empedocles largely dietetic. Knowledge is explained by the principle that the several elements in the things outside us are perceived by the corresponding elements in ourselves. We know only in so far as we have within us a nature cognate to the See also:object of knowledge. Like is known by like. The whole body is full of pores, and hence respiration takes See also:place over the whole See also:frame. But in the See also:organs of sense these pores are specially adapted to receive the effluxes which are continually rising from bodies around us; and in this way See also:perception is somewhat obscurely explained. The theory, however unsatisfactory as an explanation, has one great merit, that it recognizes between the eye, for instance, and the object seen an intermediate something. Certain particles go forth from the eye to meet similar particles given forth from the object, and the resultant contact constitutes See also:vision. This See also:idea contains within it the germ of the modern idea of the subjectivity of sense-given data; perception is not merely a passive reflection of See also:external See also:objects. It is not easy to harmonize these quasi-scientific theories with the theory of transmigration of souls which Empedocles seems to expound. Probably the See also:doctrine that the divinity (6aL swv) passes from element to element, nowhere finding a See also:home, is a mystical way of teaching the continued identity of the principles which are at the bottom of every phase of development from inorganic nature to man. At the See also:top of the See also:scale are the prophet and the physician, those who have best learned the secret of life; they are next to the divine. One See also:law, an identity of elements, pervades all nature; existence is one from end to end; the plant and the animal are links in a See also:chain where man is a See also:link too; and even the distinction between male and female is transcended. The beasts are kindred with man ; he who eats their flesh is not much better than a cannibal. Looking at the opposition between these and the ordinary opinions, we are not surprised that Empedocles notes the See also:limitation and narrowness of human perceptions. We see, he says, but a part, and See also:fancy that we have grasped the whole. But the senses cannot See also:lead to truth; thought and reflection must look at the thing on every See also:side. It is the business of a philosopher, while he See also:lays See also:bare the fundamental difference of elements, to display the identity that subsists between what seem unconnected parts of the universe. See Diog. Laert. viii. 51-77; Sext. Empiric. Adv. math. vii. 123; See also:Simplicius, Phys. f. 24, f. 76. For See also:text See also:Simon See also:Karsten, " Empedoclis Agrigenti carminum reliquiae," in Reliq. Phil. See also:vet. (See also:Amsterdam, 1838) ; F. W. A. Mullach, Fragmenta philosophorum Graecorum, vol. i.; H. See also:Stein, Empedoclis Agrigenti fragmenta (See also:Bonn, 1882); H. See also:Ritter and L. See also:Preller, Historia philosophiae (4th ed., See also:Gotha, 1869), See also:chap. iii. ad fin. ; A. See also:Fairbanks, The First Philosophers of See also:Greece (1898). See also:Verse See also:translation, W. E. Leonard (1908). For See also:criticism E. See also:Zeller, Phil. der Griechen (Eng. trans. S. F. Alleyne, 2 vols., See also:London, 1881); A. W. Benn, Greek Philosophers (1882); J. A. See also:Symonds, Studies of the Greek Poets (3rd ed., 1893), vol. i. chap. 7; C. B. See also:Renouvier, See also:Manuel de philosophie ancienne (See also:Paris, 1844); T. See also:Gomperz, Greek Thinkers, vol. i. (Eng. trans. L. See also:Magnus, 1901); W. Windelband, Hist. of Phil. (Eng. trans. 1895) ; many articles in See also:periodicals (see See also:Baldwin's See also:Diet. of Philos. vol. iii. 19o). W. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] EMMONS, NATHANAEL (1745–1840) |
[next] EMPEROR (Fr. empereur, from the Lat. imperator) |