Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
PHARISEES , a See also:sect of the See also:Jews first mentioned by See also:Josephus, in his See also:account (See also:Ant. xiii. 5, 9) of the reign of See also:Jonathan, the See also:brother and successor of Judas Maccabaeus. The name, which may be translated " Separatists," indicates their devotion to the ideal, enforced by See also:Ezra and See also:Nehemiah upon the reluctant Jews, of a nation See also:separate from all other nations in virtue of its
See also:peculiar relation to Yahweh (Neh. ix.). This ideal nation consisted of all who were prepared to obey the See also:Law of See also:Moses, irrespective of their natural descent. Consequently the Pharisees, who seem to have been an See also:order of religious teachers, were concerned to make converts (proselytes), and some of their greatest teachers were of non-Jewish parentage. They were also concerned to insist upon the strict observance of the Law, so far as it was compatible with the exigencies of See also:ordinary See also:life, and to See also:train disciples who should seta proper example to the See also:mass of the See also:people.
The ideal of separation descended from the See also:Great See also:Synagogue (See also:Assembly) of the See also:time of Ezra to the Synagogue of the Hasidaeans (Assidaeons), who allied themselves with Judas Maccabaeus when his followers decided to suspend the law of the See also:Sabbath, in order that the true Jews might preserve themselves from annihilation and survive to keep the Law as a whole. This See also:action of the Hasidaeans is clearly the See also:practical outcome of the principle which Josephus describes in the See also:language of See also:philosophy as the characteristic of the Pharisees—" some things and not all are the See also:work of See also:Fate " (Ant. xiii. 5, q). Fate is the Stoic See also:term for See also:God; and these forerunners of the Pharisees judged that the time had come for them to take action rather than to wait passively on God. But then and always the See also:prime concern of the Pharisees was the See also:extension of God's See also:sovereignty (the See also:Kingdom of God) throughout the See also:world. God's will, which all men should obey, was revealed in the Law, and though He might appoint See also:governors over them, He remained their See also: When Judas reconquered See also:Jerusalem and re-dedicated the desecrated See also:Temple, his work, from the Pharisees' point of view, was done. The Temple-See also:worship was See also:part and See also:parcel of the Divine See also:plan, and a legitimate High See also:Priest was necessary. Alanius was, therefore, welcomed by the Hasidaeans, and only his treacherous See also:murder of sixty of their number taught them that any Syrian nominee was their enemy. Later they acquiesced in the See also:election of See also:Simon to the high-priesthood with the See also:condition " until there should arise a faithful prophet "; but some of them remonstrated against the See also:combination of the sacred See also:office with the position of See also:political ruler in the See also:person of See also: But for such representations there is no solid ground. Superficially the language of apocalypses differs from that of rabbinic deci- sions., and where the seer takes a comprehensive view of the ages the See also:rabbi legislates for particular cases. But even in the See also:Talmud the reign of Alexandra is described in apocalyptic language such as is commonly applied to the future age, and if See also:allowance be made for the symbolism proper to revelations it is clear that essentially the See also:scribe and the seer have the same purpose and even the same doctrines. The Pharisees were occupied with thepiecemeal realization of the dreams of their supposed opponents, which gain a vague See also:glory from their being far off. The gospels generally have See also:left upon the minds of men an impression unfavourable to the Pharisees. They contain denunciations attributed to our See also:Lord and assigned—with obvious injustice in some cases—to the scribes of this sect. It is to be remembered that the Pharisees were the only sect of the Jews who survived in See also:Christian times and that the Pharisees were never a homogeneous body possessed of a definite policy or body of doctrine. Moreover it is clear that our Lord denounced not all the Pharisees but the hypocrites only, as did the rabbis whose sayings are reported in the Talmud and other Jewish books. Again the third See also:gospel in particular betrays relations between the Pharisees and Jesus very different from those of the common Christian view, which conjures up an impossible picture of an See also:absolute See also:breach between the Prophet of See also:Nazareth and the whole See also:corporation of the Pharisees as a result of a See also:quarrel with certain members of that dissident sect of See also:independent thinkers. See also:Gamaliel and his See also:pupil St See also:Paul are better representatives of the non-hypocritical Pharisee; and the Pauline Epistles or the writings of See also:Philo are the best extant examples of the manner and matter of their teaching. As for the denunciations, apart from the See also:charge of insincerity, it appears that the scribes in question are pilloried for the defects—or the excesses—of their qualities. Indeed they are corroborative See also:evidence for the reverence with which the Pharisees were regarded by the people generally, and for the zeal with which they strove to fulfil God's will as contained in the Law and elucidated by the Tradition. (J. H. A. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] PHARI |
[next] PHARMACOLOGY |