Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

COLLIER, JOHN PAYNE (1789–1883)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V06, Page 690 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

COLLIER, See also:JOHN See also:PAYNE (1789–1883) , See also:English Shakespearian critic, was See also:born in See also:London, on the 11th of See also:January 1789. His See also:father, John See also:Dyer Collier (1762–1825), was a successful journalist, and his connexion with the See also:press obtained for his son a position on the See also:Morning See also:Chronicle as See also:leader writer, dramatic critic and reporter, which continued till 1847; he was also for some See also:time a reporter for The Times. He was summoned before the See also:House of See also:Commons in 1819 for giving an incorrect See also:report of a speech by See also:Joseph See also:Hume. He entered the See also:Middle See also:Temple in 1811, but was not called to the See also:bar until 1829. The delay was partly due to his indiscretion in See also:publishing the Criticisms on the Bar (1819) by " Amicus Curiae." His leisure was given to the study of See also:Shakespeare and the See also:early English See also:drama. After some See also:minor publications he produced in 1825–1827 a new edition of See also:Dodsley's Old Plays, and in 1833 a supplementary See also:volume entitled Five Old Plays. In 1831 appeared his See also:History of English Dramatic See also:Poetry and See also:Annals of the See also:Stage to the Restoration, a badly arranged, but valuable See also:work. It obtained for him the See also:post of librarian to the See also:duke of See also:Devonshire, and, subsequently, See also:access to the See also:chief collections of early English literature throughout the See also:kingdom, especially to the treasures of See also:Bridgwater House. These opportunities were unhappily misused to effect a See also:series of See also:literary fabrications, which may be charitably, and perhaps not unjustly, attributed to literary monomania, but of which it is difficult to speak with See also:patience, so completely did they for a See also:long time bewilder the See also:chronology of Shakespeare's writings, and such suspicion have they thrown upon MS. See also:evidence in See also:general. After New Facts, New Particulars and Further Particulars respecting Shakespeare had appeared and passed See also:muster, Collier produced (1852) the famous See also:Perkins See also:Folio, a copy of the second folio (1632), so called from a name written on the See also:title-See also:page. On this See also:book were numerous MS. emendations of Shakespeare said by Collier to be from the See also:hand of " an old corrector." He published these corrections as Notes and Emendations to the See also:Text of Shakespeare (1852), and boldly incorporated them in his edition (1853) of Shakespeare. Their authenticity was disputed by S.

W. See also:

Singer in The Text of Shakespeare Vindicated (1853) and by E. A. Brae in Literary See also:Cookery (18J5) on See also:internal evidence; and when in 1859 the folio was submitted by its owner, the duke of Devonshire, to experts at the See also:British Museum, the emendations were incontestably proved to be forgeries of See also:modern date. Collier was exposed by Mr See also:Nicholas See also:Hamilton in his Inquiry (1860). The point whether he was deceiver or deceived was See also:left undecided, but the falsifications of which he was unquestionably guilty among the See also:MSS. at See also:Dulwich See also:College have left little doubt respecting it. He had produced the See also:Memoirs of See also:Edward See also:Alleyn for the Shakespeare Society in 1841. He followed up this volume with the Alleyn Papers (1843) and the See also:Diary of P. See also:Henslowe (1845). He forged the name of Shakespeare in a genuine See also:letter at Dulwich, and the See also:spurious entries in Alleyn's Diary were proved to be by Collier's hand when the See also:sale of his library in 1884 gave access to a transcript he had made of the Diary with interlineations corresponding with the Dulwich forgeries. No statement of his can be accepted without verification, and no See also:manuscript he has handled without careful examination, but he did much useful work. He compiled a valuable See also:Bibliographical and See also:Critical See also:Account of the Rarest Books in the English See also:Language (1865); he reprinted a See also:great number of early English tracts of extreme rarity, and rendered See also:good service to the numerous antiquarian See also:societies with which he was connected, especially in the See also:editions he produced for the See also:Camden Society and the See also:Percy Society.

His Old See also:

Man's Diary (1871-1872) is an interesting See also:record, though even here the taint of fabrication is not absent. Unfortunately what he did amiss is more striking to the See also:imagination than what he did aright, and he will be chiefly remembered by it. He died at See also:Maiden-See also:head, where he had long resided, on the 17th of See also:September 1883. For an account of the discussion raised by Collier's emendations see C.M. See also:Ingleby., See also:Complete View of the Shakespeare Controversy (1861).

End of Article: COLLIER, JOHN PAYNE (1789–1883)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
COLLIER, JEREMY (1650-1726)
[next]
COLLIN