Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
LYRICAL See also:POETRY , a See also:general See also:term for all poetry which is, or can be supposed to be, susceptible of being sung to the See also:accompaniment of a musical See also:instrument. In the earliest times it may be said that all poetry was of its essence lyrical. The primeval oracles were chanted in See also:verse, and the Orphic and Bacchic Mysteries, which were celebrated at See also:Eleusis and elsewhere, combined, it is certain, See also:metre with See also:music. See also:Homer and See also:Hesiod are each of them represented with a See also:lyre, yet if any poetry can be described as non-lyrical, it is surely the archaic See also:hexameter of the Iliad and the Erga. These poems were styled epic, in See also:direct contradistinction to the lyric of See also:Pindar and See also:Bacchylides. But inexactly, since it is See also:plain that they were recited, with a plain accompaniment on a stringed instrument. However, the distinction between epical and lyrical, between Ta "em7, what was said, and Ta hX,7, what was sung, is accepted, and neither Homer nor Hesiod is among the lyrists. This distinction, however, is often without a difference, as for example, in the See also:case of the so-called See also:Hymns of Homer, epical in See also:form but wholly lyrical in See also:character. See also:Hegel, who has gone minutely into this question in his Esthetik, contends that when poetry is See also:objective it is epical, and when it is subjective it is lyrical. This is to ignore the metrical form of the poem, and to See also:deal with its character only. It would constrain us to regard See also:Wordsworth's Excursion as a lyric, and See also:Tennyson's_ Revenge (where the subject is treated exactly as one of the Homeridae would have treated an Ionian myth) as an epic. This is impossible, and recalls us to the importance of taking the form into See also:consideration. But, with this warning, the See also:definition of Hegel is valuable. It is, as he insists, the See also:personal thought, or See also:passion, or See also:inspiration, which gives its character to lyrical poetry. The lyric has the See also:function of revealing, in terms of pure See also:art, the secrets of the inner See also:life, its hopes, its fantastic joys, its sorrows, its See also:delirium. It is easier to exclude the dramatic See also:species from lyric than to banish the epic. There are large sections of See also:drama which it is inconceivable should be set to music, or sung, or even given in recitative. The tragedies of See also:Racine, for ex-ample, are composed of the purest poetry, but they are essentially non-lyrical, although lyrical portions are here and there attached to them. The intensity of feeling and the See also:melody of verse in Othello does not make that See also:work an example of lyrical poetry, and this is even more acutely true of Le Misanthrope, which is, nevertheless, a poem. The tendency of See also:modern drama is to See also:divide itself further and further from lyric, but in See also:early ages the two kinds were indissoluble. Tragedy was See also:goat-See also:song, and the earliest specimens of it were mainly composed of choruses. As Prof. G. G. See also: The earliest See also:English critic who enters into a discussion of the See also:laws of See also:prosody, See also: But the sonnet as See also:Shakespeare, Wordsworth and even See also:Petrarch used it was a cry from the See also:heart, a subjective See also:confession, and although there is perhaps no See also:evidence that a sonnet was ever set to music with success, yet there is no reason why that might not be done without destroying its sonnet-character. See also:Jouffroy was perhaps the first aesthetician to see quite clearly that lyrical poetry is, really, nothing more than another name for poetry itself, that it includes all the personal and enthusiastic See also:part of what lives and breathes in the art of verse, so that the divisions of pedantic See also:criticism are of no real avail to us in its consideration. We recognize a narrative or epical poetry; we recognize drama; in both of these, when the individual inspiration is strong, there is much that trembles on the See also:verge of the lyrical. But outside what is pure epic and pure drama, all, or almost all, is lyrical. We say almost all, because the difficultyarises of knowing where to See also:place descriptive and didactic poetry. The Seasons of See also:Thomson, for instance, a poem of high merit and lasting importance in the See also:history of literature—where is that to be placed? What is to be said of the See also:Essay on See also:Man? In primitive times, the former would have been classed under epic, the second would have been composed in the supple iambic trimeter which so closely resembled daily speech, and would not have been sharply distinguished from prose. Perhaps this See also:classification would still serve, were it not for the See also:element of versification, which makes a See also:sharp See also:line of demarcation between poetic art and prose. This complexity of form, rhythmical and stanzaic, takes much of the place which was taken in antiquity by such music as See also:Terpander is supposed to have supplied. In a perfect lyric by a modern writer the instrument is the metrical form, to which the words have to adapt themselves. There is perhaps no writer who has ever lived in whose work this phenomenon may be more fruitfully studied than it may be in the songs and lyrics of See also:Shelley. The See also:temper of such pieces as " See also:Arethusa " and " The See also:Cloud " is indicated by a form hardly more ambitious than a See also:guitar; Hellas is full of passages which suggest the See also:harp; in his songs Shelley touches the See also:lute or See also:viol de gamba, while in the great odes to the " See also:West See also:Wind " and to " See also:Liberty " we listen to a verse-form which reminds us by its See also:volume of the See also:organ itself. On the whole subject of the nature of lyric poetry no commentary can be more useful to the student than an examination of the lyrics of Shelley in relation to those of the song-writers of ancient Greece. See Hegel, See also:Die Phanomenologie See also:des Geistes (1807); T. S. Jouffroy, Cours d'esthitique (1843); W. See also:Christ, Metrik der Griechen and Romer, 2te. Aufl. (1879). (E. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] LYRE (Gr. Xupa) |
[next] LYSANDER (Gr. Abcavdpos) |