Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:DOLLINGER, JOHANN See also:JOSEPH IGNAZ VON (1799-1890) , See also:German theologian and See also: A. See also:Mohler (q.v.) who afterwards became his friend, on being appealed to, pronounced on the whole in his favour. He also entered into relations with the well-known See also:French Liberal Catholic See also:Lamennais, whose views on the reconciliation of the Roman Catholic Church with the principles of See also:modern society had aroused much suspicion in Ultramontane circles. In 1832 Lamennais, with his See also:friends See also:Lacordaire and See also:Montalembert, visited Germany, and obtained considerable sympathy in their attempts to bring about a modification of the Roman Catholic attitude to modern problems. Doilinger seems to have regarded favourably the removal, by the Bavarian See also:government, in 1841, of Professor Kaiser from his See also:chair, because he had taught the See also:infallibility of the See also:pope. On the other See also:hand, he published atreatise in 1838 against mixed marriages, and in 1843 wrote: strongly in favour of requiring See also:Protestant soldiers to kneel at the See also:consecration of the See also:Host when compelled officially to be See also:present at See also:Mass. Moreover, in his See also:works on The See also:Reformation (3 vols. See also:Regensburg, 1846–1848) and on See also:Luther (1851, Eng, tr., 1853) he is very severe on the Protestant leaders, and he also accepts, in his earlier works, the Ultramontane view then current on the See also:practical See also:condition of the Church of See also:England, a view which in later days he found See also:reason to See also:change, Meanwhile he had visited England, where he was well received; and he afterwards travelled in See also: In 1847, in consequence of the fall from power of the See also:Abel See also:ministry in Bavaria, with which he had been in See also:close relations, he was removed from his professorship at Munich, but in 1849 he was invited to occupy the chair of ecclesiastical history. In 1848, when nearly every See also:throne in See also:Europe was shaken by the spread of revolutionary sentiments, he was elected delegate to the See also:national German See also:assembly at See also:Frankfort,—a sufficient See also:proof that at this time he was regarded as no See also:mere narrow and technical theologian, but as a See also:man of wide and independent views. It has been said that his change of relations to the Papacy dated from the See also:Italian See also:war in 1859, but no sufficient reason has been given for this statement. It is more probable that, like See also:Grosseteste, he had imbibed in early youth an enthusiastic sentiment of See also:attachment to the Papacy as the only centre of authority, and the only See also:guarantee for public See also:order in the Church, but that his experience of the actual working of the papal See also:system (and especially a visit to Rome in 1857) had to a certain extent convinced him how little correspondence there was between his ideal and the reality. He may also have been unfavourably impressed with the promulgation by See also:Pius IX. in 1854 of the See also:dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin. But what-ever may have been his reasons, he ultimately became the See also:leader of those who were energetically opposed to any addition to, or more stringent See also:definition of, the See also:powers which the Papacy had possessed for centuries. In some speeches delivered at Munich in 1861 he outspokenly declared his view that the See also:maintenance of the Roman Catholic Church did not depend on the temporal See also:sovereignty of the pope. His See also:hook on The Church and the Churches (Munich, 1861) dealt to a certain extent with the same question. In 1863 he invited too theologians to meet at See also:Malines and discuss the question which Lamennais and Lacordaire had prematurely raised in France, namely, the attitude that should be assumed by the Roman Catholic Church towards modern ideas. His address to the assembled divines was " practically a See also:declaration of war against the Ultramontane party." He had spoken boldly in favour of freedom for the Church in the Frankfort national assembly in 1848, but he had found the authorities of his Church claiming a freedom of a very different See also:kind from that for which he had contended. The freedom he claimed for the Church was freedom to See also:manage her affairs' without the interference of the See also:state; the champions of the papal See also:monarchy, and notably the Jesuits, desired freedom in order to put a stop to the dissemination of modern ideas. The addresses delivered in the Catholic See also:congress at Malines were a declaration in the direction of a Liberal See also:solution of the problem of the relations of Church and State. The pope for a moment seemed to hesitate, but there could be little doubt what course he would ultimately pursue, and after four days' debate the assembly was closed at his command. On the 8th of See also:December 1864 Pius' IX. issued were rated. In 1787 the See also:dollar was introduced as the unit in the See also:United States, and it has remained as the See also:standard of value either in See also:silver or See also:gold in that See also:country. For the history of the various changes in the weights and value of the See also:coin see See also:NUMISMATICS. The See also:Spanish piece-of-eight was also the ancestor of the Mexican dollar, the See also:Newfoundland dollar, the See also:British dollar circulating in Hong See also:Kong and the Straits Settlements, and the dollar of the See also:South See also:American republics, although many of them are now dollars only in name. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] DOLLING, ROBERT WILLIAM RADCLYFFE (1851–1902) |
[next] DOLLOND, JOHN (1706—1761) |