Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:NUMISMATICS (See also:Lat. numisma, nomisma, a See also:coin; from the See also:Greek, derived from voj4 u', to use according to See also:law) , the See also:science treating of coins (See also:Low Lat. See also:cuneus, a See also:die) and medals (Low Lat. medalla, a small coin).
The earliest known coins were issued by the Greeks in the 7th See also:century before the See also:Christian era. By the 4th century the whole civilized See also:world used See also:money (q.v.), each See also:state generally having its proper coinage. Thisas continued to be the See also:case to the See also:present See also:time; so that now t ere are few nations without a See also:metal currency of their own, and of these but a small proportion are wholly unacquainted with the use of coins.
Coins, although they confirm See also:history, rarely correct it, and never very greatly. The earliest belong to a time and to nations as to which we are not otherwise wholly ignorant, and they do not afford us that precise See also:information which, would fill in any important details of the meagre See also:sketch of contemporary history. We gain from them scarcely any See also:direct See also:historical information, except that certain cities or princes issued money. When in later times the devices and See also:inscriptions of the coins give more detailed information, history is far See also:fuller and clearer, so that the numismatic See also:evidence is rarely more than corroborative. There are, indeed, some remarkable exceptions to this See also:rule, as in the case of the Bactrian and See also:Indian coins, which have supplied the outlines of a portion of history which was otherwise almost wholly lost. The value of the corroborative evidence afforded by coins must not, however, be overlooked. It chiefly relates to See also:chronology, although it also adds to our knowledge of the pedigrees of royal houses. But perhaps the most interesting manner in which coins and medals illustrate history is in their bearing contemporary, or nearly contemporary, portraits of the most famous See also:kings and captains, from the time of the first successors of See also: There is no more delightful See also:companion in historical See also:reading than a See also:cabinet of coins and medals. The strength and See also:energy of Alexander, the ferocity of See also:Mithradates, the philosophic calmness of See also:Antoninus, the obstinate ferocity of See also:Nero, and the brutality of See also:Caracalla are as See also:plain on the coins as in the pages of history. The numismatic portraits of the time following the See also:founding of See also:Constantinople have less individuality; but after the revival of See also:art they recover that quality, and maintain it to our own See also:day, although executed in very different styles from those of antiquity. From this last class we can See also:form a See also:series of portraits more See also:complete and not less interesting than that of the See also:ancient period.
While coins and medals thus illustrate the events of history,
they have an equally direct bearing on the belief of the nations
See also:Mythology. by which they were issued; and in this reference lies
no small part of their value in connexion with history.
The mythology of the Greeks, not having been fixed in sacred
writings, nor regulated by a dominant priesthood, but having grown out of the different beliefs of various tribes and isolated settlements, and having been allowed to form itself comparatively without check, can scarcely be learned from ancient books. Their writers give us but a partial or See also:special view of it, and See also:modern authors, in their attempts to systematize, have often but increased the confusion. The Greek coins, whether of kings or cities, until the See also:death of Alexander, do not, with a few negligible exceptions, represent the human form. Afterwards, on the See also:regal coins, the See also: There are in modern galleries very few statues of Greek divinities, including such as were intended for architectural decoration, which are in See also:good See also:style, fairly preserved, and untouched by modern restorers. If to these we add reliefs of the same class, and the best Graeco-Roman copies, we can scarcely form a complete series of the various representations of these divinities. The coins, however, See also:supply us with the series we See also:desire, and we may select types which are not merely of good See also:work, but of the finest. The mythology of ancient See also:Italy, as distinct from that of the Greek colonies of Italy, is not so fully illustrated by the coins of the See also:country, because these are for the most part of Greek See also:design. There are, however, some remarkable exceptions, especially in the money of the Roman See also:commonwealth, the greater number of the types of which are of a See also:local See also:character, including many that refer to the myths and traditions of the earliest days of the See also:city. The coins of the empire are especially important, as bearing representations of those personifications of an allegorical character to which the See also:influence of See also:philosophy gave great prominence in Roman mythology. Coins are scarcely less valuable in relation to See also:geography than to history. The position of towns on the See also:sea or on See also:rivers, the See also:race of their inhabitants, and many similar particulars are Geo- positively fixed on numismatic evidence. The informa- sg aphy. tion that coins convey as to the details of the history of towns and countries has a necessary connexion with geography, as has also their See also:illustration of local forms of See also:worship. The representations of natural productions on ancient money are of special importance, and afford assistance to the lexicographer. This is particularly the case with the Greek coins, on which these See also:objects are frequently portrayed with great fidelity. We must recollect, however, that the nomenclature of the ancients was vague, and frequently comprised very different objects under one appellation, and that therefore we may find very different representations corresponding to the same name. The art of sculpture, of which coin-See also:engraving is the offspring, receives the greatest illustration from numismatics. Not only is the memory of lost statues preserved to us in the designs of ancient coins, but those of See also:Greece afford admirable examples of that skill by which her sculptors attained their great renown. The excellence of the designs of very many Greek coins struck during the period of the best art is indeed so great that, were it not for their smallness, they would form the finest series of art-studies in the world. The Roman coins, though at no time to be compared to the purest Greek, yet represent not unworthily the Graeco-Roman art of the empire. From the See also:accession of See also:Augustus to the death of See also:Commodus they are often fully equal to the best Graeco-Roman statues. This may be said, for instance, of the dupondii struck in See also:honour of Livia by Tiberius and by the younger See also:Drusus, of the sestertii of See also:Agrippina, and of the See also:Flavian emperors, and of the See also:gold coins of Antoninus See also:Pius and the two Faustinas, all which present portraits of remarkable beauty and excellence. The See also:Italian medals of the See also:Renaissance are scarcely less useful as records of the progress and characteristics of art, and, placed by the See also:side of the Greek and Roman coins, complete the most remarkable See also:comparative series of monuments illustrating the history of the great See also:schools of art that can be brought together. Ancient coins throw some See also:light upon the See also:architecture as well as upon the sculpture of the nations by which they were struck. Under the empire, the Roman coins issued at the city very frequently See also:bear representations of important edifices. The Greek imperial coins struck in the provinces present similar types, representing the most famous temples and other structures of their cities, •of the form of some of which we should otherwise have been wholly ignorant. The art of See also:gem-engraving among the ancients is perhaps most nearly connected with their coinage. The subjects of coins and gems are so similar and so similarly treated that the authenticity of gems, that most difficult of archaeological questions, receives the greatest aid from the study of coins. After what has been said it is not necessary to do more than mention how greatly the study of coins tends to illustrate the Ltterseure. contemporary literature of the nations which issued them. Not only the historians, but the philosophers and the poets, are constantly illustrated by the money of their times. This was perceived at the revival of letters; and during the 17th and 18th centuries coins were very frequently engraved in the larger See also:editions of the See also:classics. The science of numismatics is of comparatively See also:recent origin. The ancients do not seem to have formed collections, although they appear to have occasionally preserved individual Origin specimens for their beauty. See also:Petrarch has the See also:credit of the Scknce. of having been the first See also:collector of any See also:note; but it is probable that in his time ancient coins were already attracting no little See also:notice. The importance of the study of all coins has since been by degrees more and more recognised, and at present no See also:branch of the pursuit is See also:left wholly unexplored. Besides its bearing upon the history, the See also:religion, the See also:manners, and the arts of the nations which have used money, the science ct>ce1 of numismatics has a special modern use in relation to Pra Use. art. Displaying the various styles of art prevalent in different ages, coins supply us with abundant means for promoting the See also:advancement of art among ourselves. If the study of many schools be at all times of See also:advantage, it is especially so when there is little originality in the world. Its least value is to point out the want of See also:artistic merit and historical See also:commemoration in modern coins, and to suggest that modern medals should be executed after some study of the rules which controlled the great works of former times. See also:Definitions.—The following are the most necessary numismatic definitions. 1. A coin is a piece of metal of a fixed See also:weight, stamped by authority of See also:government, and employed as a circulating See also:medium.' 2. A See also:medal is a piece, having no place in the currency, struck'to commemorate some event or See also:person. Medals are frequently comprised with coins in descriptions that apply to both equally; thus, In the subsequent definitions, by the See also:term coins, coins and medals must generally be understood. 3. The coinage of a country is usually divided into the classes of gold, See also:silver and See also:bronze (See also:copper), for which the abbreviations N, JR, and sE are employed in catalogues. In addition to these metals, and to the modifications of them created by the presence of varying amounts of alloy, certain other compounds were frequently used, notably See also:electrum, billon, See also:brass and potin. ' This See also:definition excludes, on the one See also:hand, See also:paper currencies and their equivalents among barbarous nations, such as cowries, because they are neither of metal nor of fixed weight, although either stamped or sanctioned by authority, and, on the other hand, modes of keeping metal in weight, like the so-called See also:Celtic " See also:ring-money," because it is not stamped, although perhaps sanctioned by authority. The latter has attracted much See also:attention, but it is by no means made out that the rings were made with the See also:primary intention of serving as money. But it is a very See also:common usage among See also:savage or semi-savage races to See also:wear all their See also:wealth in the form of ornaments (as a woman may even now wear her See also:dowry as ornaments in the form of coins) and to use the ornaments (or cut-off portions of them, " 'killings ") whenever occasion arises as a medium of See also:exchange. These rings then were doubtless used in this manner, but they were no more money than were any other See also:precious possessions which couldbe used in exchange. There is no good evidence for the use of the little Gaulish " wheels " as money. On these questions see Blanchet, Monn. See also:gaul. pp. 24-29. On the border of the definition are such prehistoric " dumps " of metal as have been found at Enkomi in See also:Cyprus and at See also:Cnossus in See also:Crete; one of these indeed seems to bear traces of a See also:mark of some See also:kind. 4. Electrum See also:Oliver pop, Ti\EKTpoS, XEUKdS Xpuoos),acompound metallic substance, consisting of gold with a considerable alloy of silver. See also:Pliny makes the proportion to have been four parts of gold to one of silver.2 The material of See also:early coins of See also:Asia See also:Minor struck in the cities of the western See also:coast is the ancient electrum. The amount of silver varies very considerably with time and place. Gold largely alloyed with silver, not struck by the ancient Greeks or their neighbours, should be termed See also:pale gold, as in the case of some of the See also:late See also:Byzantine coins. 5. Billon, a term applied to the See also:base metal of some Roman coins, and also to that of some See also:medieval and modern coins. It contains about one-fifth silver to four-fifths copper. When the base silver coins are replaced by copper washed with silver the term billon becomes inappropriate. 6. Brass, a mixture of copper and See also:zinc. It may be used as an See also:equivalent to the orichalcum of the See also:Romans, a See also:fine kind of brass of which the sestertii and dupondii were struck, but it is commonly applied indiscriminately to the whole of their copper currency under the empire. 7. Potin, an alloy of copper and See also:tin (therefore a variety of bronze) used for some late Gaulish coins. 8. Various other metallic substances have been used in coinage, including See also:iron (in See also:Peloponnesus) and an alloy of copper and See also:nickel employed for some Bactrian coins. The so-called " See also:glass coins " of the See also:Arabs are merely coin-weights. 9. The forms of coins have greatly varied in different countries and at different periods. The usual form in both ancient and modern times has been circular, and generally of no great thickness. lo. Coins are usually measured by millimetres, or by inches and tenths, the greatest See also:dimension being taken, or, when they are square or See also:oval, the greatest dimension in two directions. 11. The weight of a coin is of great importance, both in determining its genuineness and in distinguishing its identity. Metric weights are used by most numismatists except in See also:England, where See also:troy weight is still in See also:general use. 12. The specific gravity of a coin may be of use in determining the metals in its See also:composition. 13. Whatever representations or characters are See also:borne by a coin constitute its type. The subject of each side is also called a type, and, when there is not only a See also:device but an inscription, the latter may be excluded from the term. This last is the general use. No distinct rule has been laid down as to what makes a difference of type, but it may be considered to be an essential difference, however slight. 14. A difference too small to constitute a new type makes a variety.
15. A coin is a duplicate of another when it agrees with it in all particulars but those of exact See also:size and weight. Strictly speaking, ancient coins are rarely, if ever, duplicates, except when struck from the same pair of See also:dies.
16. Struck coins are those on which the designs are produced by dies impressed on the See also:blank piece (or flan) of metal by some form of hammering or pressure; they are distinguished from See also:cast coins made by See also:running metal into a See also:mould.
17. Of the two sides of a coin, that is called the obverse which bears the more important device. In early Greek coins it is the See also:convex side, or the side impressed by the See also:lower die; in Greek and Roman imperial it is the side bearing the head ; in medieval and modern that bearing the royal effigy, or the king's name, or the name of the city; and in See also:Oriental that on which the inscription begins. The other side is called the reverse.
18. The See also: Any detached See also:independent device or character is said to be in the field, except when it occupies the exergue. 19. The exergue is that part of the reverse of a coin which is below the See also:main device, and distinctly separated from it; it often bears a secondary inscription. Thus, the well-known inscription CONOB occupies the exergue of the late Roman and early Byzantine gold coins. 20. The edge of a coin is the See also:surface of its thickness. 21. By the inscription or inscriptions of a coin all the letters it bears are intended; an inscription is either principal or secondary. 22. In describing coins the terms right and left mean the right and left of the spectator, not the heraldic and military right and left, or those of the coin. 23. A bust is the See also:representation of the head and See also:neck; it is commonly used of such as show at least the See also:collar-See also:bone, other busts being called heads. A head properly means the representation of a head alone, without any part of the neck, but it is also commonly used 2 Hist. nat. xxxiii. 23; cp. See also:xxxvii. 11. Pliny distinguishes two kinds of " See also:electron,"—See also:amber, and this metallic substance. In Greek See also:poetry the name seems to apply to both, but it is generally difficult to decide which is meant in any particular case. See also:Sophocles, however, where he mentions rdsrd EapfEwv ff XEKrpov, . Kai Tat, 'IvSucbv Xpuehv (See also:Ant. 103g-1039), can scarcely be doubted to refer to the metallic electrum. when any part of the neck above the collar-bone is shown. The present See also:article follows See also:custom in the use of the terms bust and head. When the neck is clothed, the bust is said to be draped. 24. A bust or head is either facing, usually three-See also:quarter See also:face, or in See also:profile, in which latter case it is described as to right or to left. Two busts may be placed in various relative positions, as jugate or confronted. 25. A bust wearing a See also:laurel-See also:wreath is said to be See also:laureate. 26. A bust See also:bound with a regal See also:fillet (diadem) is called diademed. 27. A bust wearing a See also:crown with rays is said to be radiate. 28. An See also:object in the field of a coin which is neither a See also:letter nor a See also:monogram is usually called a See also:symbol. This term is, however, only applicable when such an object is evidently the badge of a See also:town or individual. The term See also:adjunct, which is sometimes employed instead of symbol, is manifestly incorrect. 29. A See also:mint-mark is a difference placed by the authorities of the mint upon all money struck by them, or upon each new die or See also:separate issue. 3o. A coin is said to be " over-struck " or " re-struck " when it has been struck on an older coin, of which the types are not altogether obliterated. 31. A See also:double-struck coin is one in which the die or dies have shifted so as to cause a double impression. 32. A coin which presents two obverse types, or two reverse types, or of which the types of the obverse and reverse do not correspond, is called a See also:mule; it is the result of See also:mistake or caprice. Arrangement of Coins.—No See also:uniform See also:system has as yet been applied to the arrangement of all coins. It is usual to separate them into the three great classes of ancient coins (comprising Greek and Roman), medieval and modern, and Oriental coins. The details of these classes have been differently treated, both generally and specially. The arrangement of the Greek series has been first See also:geographical, under countries and towns, and then See also:chronological, for a further See also:division; that of the Roman series, chronological, without reference to geography; that of the medieval and modern, the same as the Greek; and that of the Oriental, like the Greek, but unsystematically—a treatment inadmissible except in the case of a single empire.. Then, again, some numismatists have separated each See also:denomination or each metal, or have separated the denominations of one metal and not of another. There has been no general and comprehensive system, constructed upon reasonable principles, and applicable to every branch of this complicated science. Without laying down a system of rules, or criticizing former modes of arrangement, we offer the following as a See also:classification which is uniform without being servile. 1. Greek Coins.—All coins of Greeks, or barbarians who adopted Greek money, struck before the Roman rule or under it, but without imperial See also:effigies. The countries and their provinces are placed in a geographical See also:order from See also:west to See also:east, according to the system of See also:Eckhel, with the cities in alphabetical order under the provinces, and the kings in chronological order. The civic coins usually precede the regal, as being the more important. The coins are further arranged chronologically, the civic commencing with the See also:oldest and ending with those bearing the effigies of Roman emperors. The gold coins of each period take See also:precedence of the silver and the silver of the copper. The larger denominations in each metal are placed before the smaller. Coins of the same denomination and period are arranged in the alphabetical order of the magistrates' names, or the letters, &c., that they bear. 2. Roman Coins.—All coins issued by the Roman commonwealth and empire, whether struck at See also:Rome or in the provinces. The arrangement is chronological, or, where this is better, under geographical divisions. 3. Medieval and Modern Coins of Euwflk.—All coins issued by Christian See also:European states, their branches and colonies, from the fall of the empire of the West to the present day. This class is arranged in a geographical and chronological order, as similar as possible to that of the Greek class, with the important exception of the Byzantine coins and the coins following Byzantine systems, which occupy the first place. The See also:reason for this deviation is that the Byzantine money may be regarded not only as the principal source of medieval coinage but as the most complete and important medieval series, extending as it does without a break throughout the middle ages. The regal coins usually precede the civic ones, as being the more important. The medals of each nation should be arranged in two series: (I) medais of rulers, according to their See also:dates; (2) medals of private persons, as far as possible according to the artists. 4. Oriental Coins.—All coins bearing inscriptions in Eastern See also:languages, excepting those of the See also:Jews, Phoenicians and Carthaginians, which are classed with the Greek coins from their See also:close connexion with them. These coins should be arranged under the following divisions: Ancient See also:Persian, Arab, Modern Persian, Indian, See also:Chinese and coins of the Far East. This method of arrangement will be found to be as uniform as it can be made, without being absolutely See also:mechanical. It differs in some important particulars from most or all of those which have previously obtained; but these very See also:differences are the result of the See also:consideration of a complete collection, and have therefore an inductive origin. A general uniformity is no slight gain, and may well reconcile us to some partial defects. I. GREEK COINS There are some matters See also:relating to Greek coins in general which may be properly considered before they are described in geographical order. These are their general character, the See also:chief denominations, with the different talents of which they were the divisions, their devices and inscriptions, their art, and the mode of striking. The period during which Greek coins were issued was probably not much less than a thousand years, commencing about the beginning of the 7th century B.C. and generally ending at the death of See also:Gallienus (A.D. 268). If classed with reference only to their form, fabric, and general See also:appearance they are of three principal types—the archaic Greek, the See also:ordinary Greek, and the Graeco-Roman. The coins of the first class are of silver, electrum and sometimes gold. They are thick lumps of an irregular See also:round form, bearing on the obverse a device, with in some cases an accompanying inscription, and on the reverse a square or oblong incuse See also:stamp (quadratum incusum), usually divided in a See also:rude manner. The coins of the second class are of gold, electrum, silver and bronze. They are much thinner than those of the preceding class, and usually have a convex obverse and a slightly See also:concave or See also:flat reverse. The obverse ordinarily bears a head in bold See also:relief. The coins of the third class are, with very few exceptions, of bronze. They are flat and broad, but thin, and generally have on the obverse the portrait of a Roman See also:emperor. Many Greek cities, however, during the empire issued quasi-autonomous coins bearing the head of some deity or personification. Greek coins thus fail mainly into the classes of autonomous, quasi-autonomous and imperial. The coinage of Roman colonies in Greek as in other lands is usually distinguished by Latin inscriptions. Since Greek coinage originated in Asia Minor, the coins were ad- sted to the weight-systems there in use, and these go back to a Buabylonian origin. But it is possible that some of the Mone See also:standard of Greece proper had a native origin. The unit systems of weight in the East was the See also:shekel (siglos). This was See also:alb of the manah (See also:mina, mna), and this of the See also:talent (talanton). This See also:scale the Greeks modified, in that, starting from the siglos as unit, they invented a money-mina of 5o sigli, with a money-talent of 6o minae or 3000 sigli. The siglos-See also:units (and corresponding See also:standards) chiefly employed in Asia Minor were the following (the relation between gold and silver at the time of the invention of these units seems to have been 131:1) : Gold shekel, 8.4o grammes. Phoenician silver shekel, 7.44 g. ='6 of 111.72 g. of silver, which was equivalent to 8.4 g. of gold. Babylonian or Persic silver shekel, 11.17 g. =ylp of 11I.72 g. of silver, which was equivalent to 8.4 g. of gold. Thus one gold shekel was the equivalent of 15 Phoenician or Io Babylonian silver shekels. Side by side with this system was another in which the weights were exactly double of those just given; a shekel of the heavier system might be regarded as a double shekel of the lighter. Various Babylonian weights are extant, dating from 2000 B.C. downwards, which prove the existence of minae of the two systems. The gold shekel standard was almost invariably used for gold coins, sometimes also for electrum. The Babylonian and Phoenician standards were also sometimes used for gold or electrum as well as silver. A weight more or less approaching that of the gold shekel or its multiples seems to have been usual all over the civilized world in Greek times; e.g. the Phocaean standard of 16.52 g. was but a modification of it. But for silver in Greece proper, from a very early period, the following standards prevailed: the Aeginetic (unit, didrachm or stater, of 12.6 g.) and the Euboic-See also:Attic (stater of 8.72 g.), with its modification the Corinthian. The Euboic-Attic standard attained enormous importance owing to the spread of Athenian See also:trade and the See also:adoption of the weight by Alexander of Macedon. It was used for both gold and silver. The Corinthian standard differed only in its divisional system, the stater being divided into thirds instead of halves. From it were derived some of the standards in use among the Greeks of S. Italy. Other standards of more local importance were : the Campanian, used in a large part of S. Italy (didrachm originally of 7.41 g., afterwards reduced), and perhaps derived from 872 the Phoenician; the Rhodian (instituted about 400 B.c., tetra-drachm about 15 g.) ; and the cistophoric (from about 200 B.C., with a tetradrachm of about 12.73 g.). Denomina- The following table exhibits the weights in grammes boas. of the principal denominations of the Greek systems The term stater is usually applied to the didrachm, but also to the tetradrachm, and at See also:Cyrene to the drachm. The bronze standards have been less fully discussed. Some notice of them will be given under different geographical heads. In the types of Greek coins (using the term in its restricted sense) the first intention of the designers was to indicate the city or state by Types, which the money was issued. The See also:necessity for distinctive devices was most strongly See also:felt in the earlier days of the art, when the obverse of a coin alone See also:bore a design, and, if any inscription, only the first letter, or the first few letters, of the name of the See also:people by whom it was issued. Whatever may have been the See also:original significance of the type in itself, religious or otherwise, it was adopted for the coinage—at least in the earliest times—because it was the badge by which the issuing authority was recognized. It was only with the increased complexity of the denominations in later times, when new distinguishing types had to be found, that—as in the 4th century B.c.—the religious See also:motive in the choice of types came deliberately into See also:play. Greek coins, if arranged according to their types, fall into three classes: (I) civic coins, and regal without portraits of sovereigns; (2) regal coins bearing portraits; and (3) Graecoclasses. Roman coins, whether with imperial heads or not. The coins of the first class have either a device on the obverse and the quadratum incusum on the reverse, or two devices; and these last are again either independent of each other, though connected by being both local, or—and this is more common—that on the reverse is a kind of See also:complement of that on the obverse. It will be best first to describe the character of the principal kinds of types of the first class, and then to notice their relation. It must be noted that a head or bust is usually an obverse type, and a figure or See also:group a reverse one, and that, when there is a head on both obverse and reverse, that on the former is usually larger than the other, and represents the personage locally considered to be the more important of the'two. We must constantly bear in mind that these types are local if we would understand their meaning. In the following See also:list the types of Greek coins of cities, and of kings, not having regal portraits, are classed in a systematic order, without reference to their relative antiquity. 1. Head or figure of a divinity worshipped at the town, or by the people, which issued the coin, as the head of See also:Athena on coins of See also:Athens, and the figure of Heracles on coins of Boeotian See also:Thebes. See also:Groups are rare until the period of Graeco-Roman coinage. 2. Natural or artificial objects—(a) See also:animal, often sacred to a divinity of the place, as the See also:owl (Athens) and perhaps the See also:tortoise (See also:Aegina); (b) See also:tree or plant, as the silphium (Cyrene) and the See also:olive-branch (Athens); (c) arms or implements of divinities, as the arms of Heracles (See also:Erythrae), the See also:tongs of See also:Vulcan (See also:Aesernia). It is difficult to connect many objects comprised in this class with local divinities. Some of them, as the See also:tunny at See also:Cyzicus, are doubtless only so connected because the chief See also:industry of a place was placed under the tutelage of its chief divinity. 3. Head or figure of a local See also:genius—(a) See also:river-See also:god, as the Gelas (See also:Gela); (b) nymph of a See also:lake, as See also:Camarina (Camarina); (c) nymph of a See also:fountain, as See also:Arethusa (See also:Syracuse). 4. Head or figure of a fabulous personage or See also:half-human See also:monster, as a See also:Gorgon (Neapolis Macedoniae), the See also:Minotaur (Cnossus). 5. Fabulous animal, as See also:Pegasus (See also:Corinth), a See also:griffin (Panticapaeum), the See also:Chimaera (See also:Sicyon). 6. Head or figure of a See also:hero or founder, as Ulysses (See also:Ithaca), the[GREEK COINS Lesser See also:Ajax (See also:Locri Opuntii), Taras, founder of See also:Tarentum (Tarentum). 7. Objects local hero, as public religious festivals and contests, as at the Olympic See also:games (Syracuse). The relation of the types of the obverse and reverse of a coin is a See also:matter requiring careful consideration, since they frequently . illustrate one another. As we have before observed, this relation is either that of two independent objects, which are connected only by their reference to the same place, or the one is a kind of complement of the other. Among coins illustrating the former class we may instance the beautiful silver didrachms of Camarina, having on the obverse the head of the river-god Hipparis and on the reverse the nymph of the lake carried over its See also:waters by a See also:swan, and those of Sicyon, having on the obverse the Chimaera and on the reverse a See also:dove. The latter class is capable of being separated into several divisions. When the head of a divinity occurs on the obverse of a coin, the reverse is occupied by an object or objects sacred to that divinity. Thus the common Athenian tetra-drachms have on the one side the head of Athene and on the other an owl and an olive-branch; the tetradrachms of the Chalcidians in See also:Macedonia have the head of See also:Apollo and the See also:lyre; and the copper coins of Erythrae have the head of Heracles and his weapons. The same is the case with subjects relating to the heroes: thus there are drachms of the Aetolian See also:League which have on the obverse the head of See also:Atalanta and on the reverse the Calydonian See also:boar, or his See also:jaw-bone and the See also:spear-head with which he was killed. In the same manner the coins of Cnossus, with the Minotaur on the obverse, have on the reverse a See also:plan of the See also:Labyrinth. Besides the two principal devices there are often others of less importance, which, although always sacred, and sometimes symbols of local divinities, are generally indicative of the position of the town, or have some reference to the families of magistrates who used them as badges. Thus, for example, besides such representations as the olive-branch sacred to Athene on the Athenian tetradrachms, as a kind of second device dolphins are frequently seen on coins of maritime places; and almost every series exhibits many symbols which can only be the badges of the magistrates with whose names they occur. Regal coins of this class, except Alexander's, usually bear types of a local character, owing to the small extent of most of the kingdoms, which were rather the territories of a city than considerable states at the period when these coins were issued. The second great class—that of coins of kings bearing portraits —is necessarily separate from the first. Religious feeling affords the See also:clue to the See also:long exclusion of regal portraits—the feeling that it would be profane for a mortal to take RePorgaitra,itswith . a place always assigned hitherto to the immortals. Were there any doubt of this, it would be removed by the character of the earliest Greek regal portrait, that of Alexander, which occurs on coins of See also:Lysimachus. This is not the representation of a living personage, but of one who was not only dead but had received a kind of See also:apotheosis, and who, having been already called the son of See also:Zeus See also:Ammon while living, had been treated as a divinity after his death. He is therefore portrayed as a See also:young Zeus Ammon. Probably, however, Alexander would not have been able, even when dead, thus to usurp the place of a divinity upon the coins, had not the Greeks become accustomed to the Oriental " worship " of the See also:sovereign, which he did not discourage. This innovation rapidly produced a complete See also:change; every king of the houses which were raised on the ruins of the Greek empire could place his portrait on the Types of Civic, &c., Coins. Gold Shekel Babylonian Phoenician. Aeginetic. Euboic-Attic. System. or Persic. Double shekel, distater or tetradrachm 16.80 22.40 14'92 25'20 17'44 Shekel, stater or didrachm . 8'4o II.20 7'46 12.60 8.72 Hemistater or drachm 4.20 5.60 3'73 6.30 4'36 Third or tetrobol 2.80 3.73 2'49 4'48 2.92 Twelfth or obol 0.70 0.93 o•62 1.12 0.73 connected with heroes—animal connected with the Calydonian boar or his jaw-bone (Aetolians). 8. Celebrated real or traditional sacred localities, as mountains on which divinities are seated, the labyrinth (Cnossus). 9. Representations connected with the a See also:chariot victorious money which he issued, and few neglected to do so, while the sovereigns of See also:Egypt and See also:Syria even assumed divine titles. The reign of Alexander produced another great change in Greek coinage, very different from that we have noticed. He suppressed the local types almost throughout his empire, and compelled the towns to issue his own money, with some slight difference for mutual distinction. His successors followed the same policy; and thus the coins of this period have a new character. The obverses of regal coins with portraits have the head of the sovereign, which in some few instances gives place to that of his own or his country's tutelary divinity, while figures of the latter sort almost exclusively occupy the reverses. Small symbols, letters, and monograms on the reverses distinguish the towns in this class. The Graeco-Roman coins begin, at different periods, with the seizure by Rome of the territories of the Greek states. They are almost all bronze; and those in that metal are the Rraeco most characteristic and important. In their types we Roman. . see a further departure from the religious intention of those of earlier times in the rare See also:admission of representations, not only of eminent persons who had received some kind of apotheosis, such as great poets, but also of others who, although famous, were not, and in some cases probably could not have been, so honoured. We also observe on these coins many types of an allegorical character. The following principal kinds of types may be specified, in addition to those of the two previous classes. (I) Head or figure of a famous personage who either had received a kind of apotheosis, as See also:Homer (See also:Smyrna), or had not been so honoured, as See also:Herodotus (See also:Halicarnassus) and Lais (Corinth). (2) Pictorial representations, always of a sacred character, although occasion-ally bordering on See also:caricature. We may instance, as of the latter sort, a very remarkable type representing Athene playing on the double See also:pipe and seeing her distorted face reflected in the See also:water, while See also:Marsyas gazes at her from a See also:rock—a subject illustrating the myth of the invention of that See also:instrument (See also:Apamea Phrygiae). (3) Allegorical types, as See also:Hope, &c., on the coins of See also:Alexandria of Egypt, and many other towns. These were of Greek origin, and owed their popularity to the sculpture executed by Greeks under the empire; but the feeling which rendered such subjects prominent was not that of true Greek art, and they are essentially characteristic of the New Attic school which attained its height at Rome under the early emperors. There is a class of coins which is always considered as part of the Graeco-Roman, although in some respects distinct. This is the colonial series, struck in Roman coloniae, and having almost always Latin inscriptions. As, however, these coloniae were towns in all parts of the empire, from Emerita in See also:Spain (See also:Merida) to Bostra in See also:Arabia, in the midst of a Greek See also:population and often of Greek origin, their coins help to complete the series of civic money, and, as we might expect, do not very markedly differ from the proper Greek imperial coins except in having Latin inscriptions and showing a preference for Roman types. We have now to speak of the meaning of the inscriptions of Greek coins. These are either principal or secondary; but the former InscNp- are always intended when inscriptions are mentioned Jnscri without qualification, since the secondary ones are non- dons. The inscription of civic money is almost always the name of the people by which it was issued, in the genitive plural, as AOHNAISIN on coins of the Athenians, EYPAKOEIf1N on coins of the Syracusans, or the name of the city in the genitive singular, as AKPAI'ANTOE at See also:Agrigentum. The inscription of regal money is the name, or name and See also:title, of the sovereign in the genitive, as AAE ANAPOY, or BAEIAECIE AAE,ANAPOY, on coins of Alexander the Great. Instead of this genitive an See also:adjective is sometimes found, as 'Apea&iKbv on early Arcadian coins, 'See also:AXE vbpsros on staters of Alexander of Pherae. This genitive or adjectival form implies a nominative understood, which has been generally supposed to be vopavpa " money," or the name of some denomination. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] NUMISMATICS |
[next] NUMMULITE |