Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
CLASSICS and ARABIAN See also:PHILOSOPHY). The doctrines and the See also:works the works of See also:Aristotle had been transmitted by the 0fArts. See also:Nestorians to the See also:Arabs, and among those kept alive by a See also:tone. See also:succession of philosophers, first in the See also:East and afterwards intheWest. The See also:chief of these, at least so far as regards the See also:influence which they exerted on See also:medieval philosophy, were See also:Avicenna, See also:Avempace and See also:Averroes. The unification by the last-mentioned of Aristotle's active See also:intellect in all men, and his consequent denial of individual See also:immortality are well known. The universal human intellect is made by him to proceed from the divine by a See also:series of Neoplatonic emanations. In the course of the 12th See also:century the writings of these men were introduced into See also:France by the See also:Jews of See also:Andalusia, of See also:Marseilles and See also:Montpellier. " These writings contained," says See also:Haureau, " the See also:text of the See also:Organon, the Physics, the See also:Metaphysics, the See also:Ethics, the De anima, the Parva naturalia and a large number of other See also:treatises of Aristotle, accompanied by continuous commentaries. There arrived besides by the same channel the glosses of See also:Theophrastus, of See also:Simplicius, of See also: By See also:special command of See also:Raimund, See also:archbishop of See also:Toledo, the chief of these works were translated from the Arabic through the Castilian into Latin by the See also:archdeacon Dominicus Gonzalvi with the aid of Johannes Avendeath (=See also:ben See also:David), a converted See also:Jew, about 1150. About the same See also:time, or not See also:long after, the See also:Liber de causis became known—a See also:work destined to have a powerful influence on Scholastic thought, especially in the See also:period immediately succeeding. Accepted at first as Aristotle's, and actually printed in the first Latin See also:editions of his works, the See also:book is in reality an Arabian compilation of Neoplatonic theses. Of a similar See also:character was the pseudo-Aristotelian Theologia which was in circulation at least as See also:early as 1200. The first effects of this immense acquisition of new material were markedly unsettling on the doctrinal orthodoxy of the time. The apocryphal Neoplatonic treatises and the First views of the Arabian commentators obscured for the effects of first students the genuine See also:doctrine of Aristotle, and the the new 13th century opens with quite a See also:crop of mystical knowledge. heresies. The mystical See also:pantheism taught at See also:Paris by Amalrich of Bena (d. 1207; see See also:AMALRIC and See also:MYSTICISM), though based by him upon a revival of Scotus See also:Erigena, was doubtless connected in its origin with the Neoplatonic treatises which now become current. The See also:immanence of See also:God in all things and His incarnation as the See also:Holy Spirit in themselves appear to have been the chief doctrines of the Amalricans. They are reported to have said, " Omnia unum, quia quicquid est est See also:Deus." About the same time David of See also:Dinant, in a book De tomis (rendered by Albertus De divisionibus), taught the identity of God with See also:matter (or the indivisible principle of bodies) and nous (or the indivisible principle of intelligences)—an extreme See also:Realism culminating in a materialistic pantheism. If they were diverse, he argued, there must exist above them some higher or See also:common See also:element or being, in which See also:case this would be God, nous, or the See also:original matter. The spread of the Amalrican doctrine led to fierce persecutions, and the provincial See also:council which met at Paris in 1209 expressly decreed " that neither the books of Aristotle on natural philosophy, nor commentaries on the same, should be read, whether publicly or privately, at Paris." In 1215 this See also:prohibition is renewed in the statutes of the university of Paris, as sanctioned by the papal See also:legate. Permission was given to lecture on the logical books, both those which had been known all along and those introduced since 1128, but the See also:veto upon the Physics is extended to the Metaphysics and the summaries of the Arabian commentators. By 1231, however, the fears of the See also: This unquestioned supremacy was not yielded, however, at the very beginning of the period. The earlier doctors who avail themselves of Aristotle's works, while bowing to his authority implicitly in matters of See also:logic, are generally found defending a Christianized See also:Platonism against the doctrine of the Metaphysics. So it is with Alexander of See also:Hales (d. 1245), the first Scholastic who was acquainted with the whole of the Aristotelian works and the Alexander Arabian commentaries upon them. He was more of a of Hates. theologian than a philosopher; and in his chief work, Summa universae theologiae, he simply employs his in- creased philosophical knowledge in the demonstration of theological doctrines. So See also:great, however, did his achievement seem that he was honoured with the titles of See also:Doctor irrefragabilis and Theologorum monarcha. Alexander of Hales belonged to the Franciscan See also:order, and it is See also:worth remarking that it was the mendicant orders Mendicant which now came forward as the protagonists of Christian learning and faith and, as it were, reconquered Aristotle friars. for the church. During the first half of the 13th century, when the university of Paris was plunged in angry feuds with the See also:municipality, feuds which even led at one time (1229) to the See also:flight of the students in a body, the friars established teachers in their See also:con-vents in Paris. After the university had settled its quarrels these continued to See also:teach, and soon became formidable rivals of the See also:secular lecturers. After a severe struggle for academical recognition they were finally admitted to all the privileges of the university by a bull of Alexander IV. in 1253. The See also:Franciscans took the See also:lead in this intellectual See also:movement with Alexander of Hales and See also:Bonaventura, but the See also:Dominicans were soon able to boast of two greater names in See also:Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. Still later See also:Duns Scotus and See also:Occam were both Franciscans. Alexander of Hales was succeeded John of in his See also:chair of instruction by his See also:pupil John of Rochelle, Rocheue, who died in 1271 but taught only till 1253. His See also:treatise De anima, on which Haureau See also:lays particular stress, is interesting as showing the greater See also:scope now given to psychological discussions. This was a natural result of acquaintance with Aristotle's De anima and the numerous Greek and Arabian commentaries upon it, and it is observable in most of the writers that have still to be mentioned. Even the nature of the universals is no longer discussed from a purely logical or metaphysical point of view, but becomes connected with psychological questions. And, on the whole, the widening of intellectual interests is the chief feature by which the second period of See also:Scholasticism may be distinguished from the first. In some respects there is more freshness and See also:interest in i3ener/ the speculations which burst forth so ardently in the end of Gene See also:aer- the I1th and the first half of the 12th century. Albert and charact istics of Aquinas no doubt stood on a higher level than See also:Anselm second and See also:Abelard, not merely by their wider range of knowledge period. but also by the intellectual massiveness of their achieve- ments; but it may be questioned whether the earlier writers did not possess a greater force of originality and a keener See also:talent. Originality was at no time the strong point of the See also:middle ages, but in the later period it was almost of See also:necessity buried under the See also:mass of material suddenly thrust upon the See also:age, to be assimilated. On the other hand, the influence of this new material is everywhere evident in the wider range of questions which are discussed by the doctors of the period. Interest is no longer to the same extent concentrated on the one question of the universals. Other questions, says Haureau, are placed on the order of the day—the question of the elements of substance, that of the principle of individuation, that of the origin of the ideas, of the manner of their existence in the human understanding and in the divine thought, as well as various others of equal interest " (i. 420). Some of these, it may be said, are simply the old Scholastic problem in a different garb; but the ex-tended See also:horizon of which Haureau speaks is amply proved by See also:mere reference to the treatises of Albert and St Thomas. They there seek to reproduce for their own time all the departments of the Aristotelian See also:system. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] CLASSED GROWTHS OF THE |
[next] CLASSIFICATION (Lat. classis, a class, probably fro... |