Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
PROFILE , an outline or See also:contour See also:drawing, particularly the drawing of the outline of the human See also:face as seen from the See also:side,. or in See also:architecture the contour of a See also:part of a See also:building, of a moulding, &c., as shown by a See also:vertical See also:section. In fortification the " profile " of an earthwork is an outline of a transverse section and gives the relative thickness; so a See also:work is said to be " of strong " or " of weak " profile. The Fr. profit, formerly porfil, pourfil, Ital. profilo, proffilo, are formed from See also:Lat. See also:pro, and flare, to draw a See also:line, filum, See also:thread. The See also:French pourfil also gave See also:English " purfle," to embroider the edge of a fabric with See also:gold or other thread; this was further corrupted to " purl," now often wrongly spelt " See also:pearl," an inverted stitch in See also:knitting. PROFIT-SHARING (i.e. between employer and employed), a method of remunerating labour, under which the employees receive, in addition to See also:ordinary See also:wages, a See also:share of the profit which the business realizes. The See also:term is not infrequently used loosely to include many forms of addition to ordinary wages, such as See also:bonus on output or quality, gain-sharing and product-bearing. Yet strictly, where an employee or a See also:group See also:works for a share of the product, or is paid so much in addition to ordinary wages in proportion as the product exceeds a certain quantity, or the quality exceeds a certain See also:standard, in neither of these cases have we profit-sharing, for the See also:net result of the business may be a large profit or a small one or a loss, and the employee's claim is unaffected. In the same way if a workman is employed on the basis that if in doing a particular See also:job he saves something out of a stipulated See also:time of labour, or a stipulated amount of materials, he shall receive in addition to ordinary wages a pro-portion of the value so saved, that is technically gain-sharing, not profit-sharing. Even where the bonus depends strictly on profit, it is not reckoned as profit-sharing, if it is confined to the leading employees. An agreement is of the essence of the See also:matter. It is not profit-sharing where an employer takes something from his profits at his own will and See also:pleasure, and gives it to his employees. Strictly such gifts in See also:cash are gratuities, while, when they take other forms, such as better houses, See also:libraries, recreation rooms, See also:provision for sickness and old See also:age, all given at the will of the employer, we have paternalism. Such benefits thus taken expressly from profits and varying more or less with the amount of profit certainly approach true profit-sharing: they are some-times called " indeterminate " profit-sharing. Though many of the above methods of remunerating, or benefiting, the employed are from time to time included under profit-sharing even by writers of repute, the strict sense of the term was defined by the See also:international See also:congress on profit-sharing in 1889 as " an agreement freely entered into by which the employed receives a share of profits determined in advance." It does not follow that the agreement must be actually enforceable at See also:law; some employers to protect themselves from litigation stipulate that it shall not be.
Profit-sharing, in the loose sense, must be of untold antiquity; the first See also:great example of profit-sharing in the strict sense is that of the Parisian See also:house-painter, Edme-See also:Jean Leclaire, " The See also:Father of Profit-Sharing." In 1842 he was employing 3,00 men
on See also:day wages. By greater zeal and intelligence and less See also:waste, not necessarily by harder work, he reckoned they could See also:save £3000 a See also:year; and he made it their See also:interest to do so by arranging that they should receive the greater part of the saving them-selves. This arrangement proved a very great success; the material gain to the men and the improvement in their morale were marked; and Leclaire, who began See also:life with nothing and died See also:worth £48,000, always maintained that, without the zeal See also:drawn out in his men by profit-sharing, he never could have made so large a business or gained so much See also:wealth. In 1908 the See also:system was still in active operation in the See also:firm. Its See also:main features are as follows: after paying 5% interest on the See also:capital, and small sums as wages of superintendence to the two managing partners, the remaining profit is divided into four parts, one of which goes to the managing partners, one to the Mutual Aid Society, and the remaining See also:half to the employees as a See also:dividend on their ordinary wages, exclusive of piece-work and overtime, on which no dividend is paid. The Mutual Aid Society is a registered See also:body, and is a limited partner in the firm, the liability of the two managing partners being unlimited and the See also:control resting entirely in their hands. The benefits of the Mutual Aid Society, and of the profit-sharing generally, are enjoyed in the main by all the employees of the business, but certain advantages are confined to a limited number of permanent employees.
Leclaire's system attracted the marked interest of See also: The See also:present extent of profit-sharing, though in itself considerable, is but small in comparison with the vast extent of the See also:world's See also:commerce and See also:industry, and except in one of its developments, co-partnership, it can hardly be said to be making progress. In 1906 there were in the See also:United See also:Kingdom and its colonies 65 ordinary firms practising profit-sharing in its strictest sense, and 17 others known to have adopted and not known to have discontinued it, making 82 in all as against 92 in 1901, and rot in 1894. On the other See also:hand the number of employees had grown from 28,000 in 1894 to 48,000 in 1906. In addition about one-See also:fourth of the workmen's co-operative See also:societies in Great See also:Britain (see Co-OPERATION) practise profit-sharing with perhaps 30,000 employees.
In 1894 it was found that there were more profit-sharing firms in the See also:British See also:Empire than in any other See also:country, and this is probably still true. The only See also:rival is See also:France, where, however, the term " participation aux benefices " is used in a wider sense. There are also important examples in See also:Germany, the United States, See also:Switzerland (where the See also:state once applied the system in the postal service, and still does in the telegraphs), in See also: In 1908, in the Familistere of See also:Guise the whole capital of £200,000 belonged to the workers and a few retired workers, in Leclaire's old business the Mutual Aid Fund owned half, in the Laroche-See also:Joubert See also:paper-works the employees owned more than two-thirds. In the See also:South See also:Metropolitan See also:Gas Co. the employees owned £327,000 and elected three of the nine See also:directors. It would seem to be in this direction, as a step to full partnership, that profit-sharing has a great future before it. (A. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] PROFESSOR (the Latin noun formed from the verb prof... |
[next] PROGNATHISM (Gr. 7rpb, forward, and yv&Oos, jaw) |